This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
EXTERMINATE! Nommed for deletion in 2007, I have no idea why we kept it. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew(r30qjd)16:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Delete. The response (but not the answer!) is in archive 57. To quote the article, "This is not funny. You did not laugh. We know it." To quote the author on the talk page, "Jesus fucking christ. My article looks way beyond awful, i don't find it myself funny too." I hate it when a bad article pleads for its life. Spıke¬ 17:12 20-Jul-10
Eh...Just not seeing the 'so awful it comes around the other side' thing the folks mentioned the first time... and anyhow, there's not much of a thing even linking to it to justify its existence of awful... ~ Apheori*shifty eyes*(talk) (stalk) -- 20100720 - 17:18 (UTC)
Disintegrate. Random and unfunny. Saberwolf116 17:42, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Mind-numbing detail on the organization, acronyms, and procedures of a cryptic organization. At least Hajime Socialist Republic had a purpose. Spıke¬ 17:17 20-Jul-10
Delete. Epically random "take" on Revenge of the Sith, by the look of it. Makes not a jot of sense. --UU - natter08:50, Jul 20
Delete. This article does not so much satirize the Star Wars movie, as encodes it. Spıke¬ 10:26 20-Jul-10
Actually based off of bootleg mistranslated English subtitles. The problem is that it's still not satire. EX-TER-MI-NATE!SirMacManiaGUN—[12:34 20 Jul 2010]
So that is who did the encoding? and I must, to appreciate this article, own a pirated DVD? Remarkable. Spıke¬ 13:09 20-Jul-10
And unless I'm mistaken, the writer didn't even have the decency to invent his/her own. Probably saw it on some blog, thought it would be funny to copy-and-paste excerpts here, and wrote it like so. SirMacManiaGUN—[13:11 20 Jul 2010]
Delete. "Stroke" just about ties this up. --Wilytank 12:36, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. So, that's a Wilde quote, one list, and not much else to write home about. Did I miss anything? Oh yeah - it's been here forever, hasn't been edited in aaaages and isn't linked from anywhere. It won't be missed. --UU - natter08:41, Jul 20
Delete. All of the above. In addition, Section 1, regarding impossibility of concrete walls in feudal Japan, reflects a refusal to use the Delete key, as in the typewriter era, when, once an error was committed to paper, your only option was to work it into the story, or joke about yourself. Spıke¬ 10:21 20-Jul-10
Ugh. Basically a list. --Wilytank 23:06, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Might have something to work with, but peters off pretty badly. Also, no mention of ghettoblasters. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:26, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Disintegrate.Saberwolf116 23:27, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. The five pillars of Islam are devotional duties. Mashing this concept onto Hip Hop could be funny. But instead of devotional duties for the rapper, most of these pillars are merely memes. And by the way, there are more than 12, and at that point they drop off precipitously, which says that an earlier version might have been better. Spıke¬ 02:39 20-Jul-10
Delete. Someone got a bad Pee Review and started a talk page in mainspace? Spıke¬ 12:48 19-Jul-10
The headline got me chuckling but when I saw the page I stopped abruptly. ~ 13:11, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
I can almost see there something to this, in the spirit of... wait... no... nope, it's not coming. Oh well. ~ Lyrithya*shifty eyes*(words) (actions) -- 20100719 - 14:50 (UTC)
Disintegrate. And what's with the Pee Review menu at the top? Saberwolf116 15:15, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Not because Hitler and the author hate the jews. Most of us hate the jews six times before breakfast. But the user didn't use the Hitler pic with the bunny ears, an unforgivable mistake. Aleister 11:52 20 7
Delete. Whose user page did this scrapbook used to be? Breaks no new ground over the many other Hitler pages, including Emo-Hitler. Spıke¬ 12:08 19-Jul-10
Keep. It has many funny and pretty smart lines and concepts. Read the whole thing, and it held my interest. Clever at more than a handful of moments. The band is made up, not a real band, but a satire of a metal band consisting of a guy and his cat. Aleister 12:01 20 7
p.s. Edited the page, seems savable.
Delete (5)
Disintegrate. 2005 band cruft. Saberwolf116 04:20, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Essentially, total vanity. Spıke¬ 10:38 19-Jul-10
Obliterate.It claims it's a heavy metal job. But after a quick search on the Metal Archives, no hits came up for this name. This proves that A) They're that obscure; B) They're not a metal band; C) They don't even exist. Now it's been stated the group doesn't exist. Now I'm voting delete just because it blows chunks. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 6:55 AM 7/19/10
?? Doesn't have to be a real band. Please give it another read and see if it works as satire, thanks. Aleister 12:04 20 7
In contrast, I took "Herkimer" in the first line to mean it is a two-man (or maybe one-man) act from upstate New York. In any case, it doesn't work as satire, because no one knows what's being made fun of: It could be any of ten thousand garage bands. Spıke¬ 12:52 19-Jul-10
Did some research and can't find any reality to the page. So if they were real, and haven't had any publicity since 2007, a fail of a band. If they aren't real, and a few users thought they were, this qualifies as satire which works to a point. Anyway, I did some edits which should make it less of a VFD page. Aleister 13:30 20 7
Delete. I think nearly any topic is legitimate for an article, but this was just not funny and was, in fact, annoyingly bad. pillow talk 18:45, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This is not the pidgin English written by foreigners that I find endearing. It's just wrong. Dunno who Marco Borsato was (by the Category, some Dutch guy), but in any case, the only joke here is anal sex. And the only illustration is an external link, and the only significant contributor in the history is I.P.Anon. Spıke¬ 22:21 18-Jul-10
Delete. This would not survive ICU today, if it even made it that far. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 01:54, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Not because it's 2005--early pages actually are important for the history of the site imnho--but because it's verrrrrry bad. Aleister 12:08 20 7
Disintegrate. Part I in a series of utterly pointless and unnecessary extensions of the original "Do NOT Click Any Links!" article created by IPs. Saberwolf116 12:30, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Nomination withdrawn as per the deleting of the last two. Saberwolf116 22:43, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Kept and, if you don't mind, I'm compiling all of these into a single entry because they're all identical and it saves a lot of paperwork. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:47, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
That's fine. Now, where's a poopsmith when you need one...? Saberwolf116 22:49, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Disintegrate. Part VI in a series of utterly pointless and unnecessary extensions of the original "Do NOT Click Any Links!" article created by IPs. Saberwolf116 12:30, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete here. The rest are keepable extensions, I think. The one before is a suitable ending. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:06, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete and redirect back to the beginning of the game just to prove the point. Agree with TKF above. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 01:45, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete as below. pillow talk 18:00, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Disintegrate. Part VII in a series of utterly pointless and unnecessary extensions of the original "Do NOT Click Any Links!" article created by IPs. Saberwolf116 12:30, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
Unnecessarily insults the reader/player. Per TKF, the above works as a better ending. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 01:46, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I'll be honest with you: I hate this article. This is one of the only FAs and certainly the only Top 10 article that I would enthusiastically vote to delete. But I know people disagree with me so I'll just vote on these two non-controversial pages. pillow talk 17:59, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Very keepable for the pics alone. And the user wrote a coherent storyline, filled it in well, and gives an interesting porn twist to Pippi. Maybe a little more work needed, but far from huffable imnho. Aleister 22:51 13 7
Delete. Random, listy until recently, and altogether none too good. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:20, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Shit, another one of these articles. Drown it in piss. pillow talk 19:27, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Disintegrate. I don't see how porn jokes are funny if they're not given any context or meaning. Saberwolf116 22:48, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
They aren't (unless really good writing saves it)--UN:HTBFANJS Sec. 6. Spıke¬ 23:36 13-Jul-10
Comments
Commit to Romartus if he will have it. His serial treatment, in UnNews Sports, of Pippi as the estranged wife of golfer Tigger Woods means he knows something about the material and can do something more creative than the one cheap laugh of casting her as a slut. Spıke¬ 19:24 13-Jul-10
OK. I'll take in the Swedish scamp and remove the template trash porn she is currently covered in unless anyone else objects. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:19, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, but please keep the porn theme though, those pics are great. Maybe mix the best of the porn with another storyline, like she's trying to get out of the business or something. Aleister 00:30 15 7
It's a bit of a porn template (the names are interchangeable but the 'story' isn't) but I was thinking more on the lines that Sweden was one of the first countries to take a more relaxed attitude towards sexual expression. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:01, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
Ah, yes, very good. A wise man has no limits. Aleister 21:33 15 7
Per Socky A few quick edits will do wonders for it. And this page is about middling in Uncy's collected pages, do you think we should take out 13,000 or so pages and leave the rest? Hmmmmmm, a good idea actually. Aleister 17:09 15 7
Keep. Not bad enough, and it looks better without the quotes and that giant table at the end skrooing up the formatting. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew(r30qjd)21:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Oh, my... I didn't know people could write that badly. ...okay, so I did, but still. ~ Lyrithya*shifty eyes*(words) (actions) -- 20100715 - 16:17 (UTC)
Main Disadvantage: Fucking Stupid (formerly Recused). Upon further review, even a reader with a full deck, so to speak, of Pokemons would surely find this article random babble. And what's with real footnotes? Spıke¬ 12:54 18-Jul-10
Comments
I recuse myself from Pokemon-ignorance. But even after the initial clean-up, I see no humor here at all. Except for the bit about being born from so-and-so's egg/vagina/anus, that there's a knee-slapper. Spıke¬ 11:53 16-Jul-10
Disintegrate. Stupid one liner created by an IP. Saberwolf116 14:43, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. You've created a cute new word for bisexuality. Other than that, where's the humor? Move to Undictionary, or Wiktionary, or the Recycle Bin. Spıke¬ 14:51 17-Jul-10
Delete. per Spike. --Wilytank 00:42, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
Disintegrate. An abandoned WIP from April that doesn't really have any jokes other than "OMG JARED ALLEN IS AWESOMMMMMMMMMMMME" Saberwolf116 03:51, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Standard randumbo opening paragraph is all you need to read to understand that reading further will be a hateful experience. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:43, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Although it includes a little information from the NFL, you could substitute anyone's name. Spıke¬ 14:34 17-Jul-10
Not right now. Peruse UnNews:Sports Page: Paul the Octopus is a meme, a media phenomenon in Germany dispensing predictions regarding the World Cup. This article, though stubby and listy, is adequate for now. Let's consider again in three months, when Paul is no longer current, whether this article deserves permanence. Spıke¬ 15:40 15-Jul-10
Eh. This doesn't seem bad enough to quash. And it apparently does actually follow something, so... eh. ~ Lyrithya*shifty eyes*(words) (actions) -- 20100715 - 16:13 (UTC)
Per Spike, and it seems ok on its own too. With a few additions it can be quite good, like having Paul pick the winner in a divorce settlement, or a story about his ancestor picking who to release between Jesus and Barabas, etc. Aleister 16:22 15 7
Keep.. It had occurred to me that my Paul the Octopus stories could do with a general article about him. This is a start but why the old lame Jesus jokes!!?--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:57, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Applying the SQL programming language to Hollywood's cynicism in creating movie sequels is a demented interpretation worthy of Uncyclopedia. Isn't done perfectly but doesn't merely "state the obvious." Spıke¬ 16:48 14-Jul-10
Absolutely terrible article in every way. Scarce funny one-liners are only found in the massive list at the heart of it, which would be suited better in a seperate "List of Apple products" page or something of that sort that I thought we already had. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:28, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
20 seconds of skimming this article tells me it's a listy and unfunny mess. If I'm wrong, please call me out on it. (Also, this reminds me of a previous vote...) Saberwolf116 03:41, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.. I can condense this to:Apple Sux Man! which, on reflection, now reads as a possible contender for VFH considering some recent nominations. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:46, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete A rant; a ranty rant at that. To some up: rant. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:40, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. As above. It's a wasteland; starting over would be an improvement. Spıke¬ 14:31 17-Jul-10
A could of the images are alright, but that does not save this... um... this. Not that I could actually read it, but I generally consider things I cannot bear to read as bad. ~ Lyrithya*shifty eyes*(words) (actions) -- 20100718 - 01:07 (UTC)
Delete. Short and dull as anything. --UU - natter11:39, Jul 16
Delete. On the second reading, it becomes clear that this contribution from I.P.Anon isn't a direct lift from Wikipedia but a hoax. Even so: Return it to them and see if they notice. Spıke¬ 11:48 16-Jul-10
Delete. This article belongs on Wikipedia, if there. It is poorly written, attempted to be informative, and stubby.--S0ckpupp3t n00b 19:16, July 16, 2010 (UTC)11:48 16-Jul-10
Delete. Author knows about similes, doesn't know about grammar, and ultimately says almost nothing specific to this town other than name-dropping. Spıke¬ 11:31 15-Jul-10
Delete. How did this escape QVFD and ICU? It's crap. --UU - natter11:15, Jul 15
Delete. Remarkable--I went into a bar in a foreign country and saw things that seemed remarkable. So write a blog somewhere. This is simply unfunny. Spıke¬ 11:27 15-Jul-10
"He smiled with a grin"Saberwolf116 12:37, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
Disintegrate. Good concept, poor execution. Saberwolf116 00:23, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
It had promise three years ago, but judging by the lack of progress I say torch it. ~ Lyrithya*shifty eyes*(words) (actions) -- 20100715 - 01:19 (UTC)
Started out well, for two sentences, then went to the territory of the damned and dropped off the hidden cliff on the first foggy morning. Aleister 1:26 15 7
Ha. This should be no more than a ramble on someone else's talk page, to which a response was never made. Spıke¬ 11:23 15-Jul-10
Delete. Shit article (eyethangyew). Less succinctly, it seems to have elements of WP spork about it, and no redeeming qualities. --UU - natter13:11, Jul 15
"HAHAHAHA THAT SHIT WAS FUNNY AS HELL!'". Article celebrates the joy of cursing on a world stage, and basically nothing else. Spıke¬ 13:17 15-Jul-10
Keep. Consistent theme and some humor. It's marginally passable. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:53, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. It's legitimate satire of what sounds like a really pathetic project. Not hilarious, but not worse than a blank page. pillow talk 17:24, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (6)
KILL IT WITH FIRE! This page is boring as hell and hasn't been touched since 2007. IP addresses are the majority contributors. I say down with it. No redeeming value. --Sf1317:34 EST 8 July, 2010
Delete.. It's ok for Wikipedia to be obscure (and hopefully correct) but this just a deadly dull effort. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:25, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
I don't know the service and won't vote, but on the surface, this tech-heavy article seems too matter-of-fact, often even touting the service rather than making sport of it. Spıke¬ 03:39 9-Jul-10
Keeper per previous VFD comments for this page (see Spike's note below). Lots of the "older" users wanted it saved. And Saberwolf's page is fine, why not just give it a slight re-name? "BC". "Pre-Saviour", "Before Jesus was born", many options. No need to remove an existing page. This one could be edited, and needs it, yet per above. Aleister 00:57 13 7 MMX
Keeper For the sake of having the score even at this point, and in keeping with the comments keep. It's in desperate need of a rewrite, but there's a bit of a laugh here and there. I wouldn't huff it at this point, even though I stopped laughing at Chuck Norris jokes a long time ago. Myocardialinfarction 11:06, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (2)
Delete and replace with My rewrite. My version still needs some work, but it's infinitely better then the utterly worthless sack of shit we have now. Saberwolf116 22:34, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
You really don't need to bring this here if you're rewriting it, dude. Just paste yours over the top when it's done - that's what I did with all my rewrites. In fact, that's kind of the point of rewrites. That's why they're called rewrites. --UU - natter12:41, Jul 12
Alright, forget this vote, then. Saberwolf116 17:34, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
No, can't forget it, read the previous VFD page on this article. Al 1:00 13 7
Ugh. 20 matches of "Chuck Norris" when I hit ctrl + F for hit. --Wilytank 22:56, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete So much Chuck Norris... maybe it doesn't need a delete, but just a rewrite. Oh wow, I'm way late. I just thought of hte old version. I was unaware that there was a rewrite done. --SadisticWolf 18:05, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Question. Can't you just replace the current article with your rewrite, since that's pretty much the point of Conservation Week? —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew(r30qjd)09:53, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Your rewrite has nothing to do with this series of pages which are listy crapola on particular periods of years. If this page goes shouldn't all of them go? Why not just keep it and rename your page something else? And it's a 2005 page, so it seems that there was a concerted effort then to make all these year and decade pages mean something. Can some of the users who were around then vote on this, I'd feel better about zapping it if it were by the people who were around at the time. Aleister 10:12 12 7
Paizuri: In my opinion, yes you could, and Saberwolf should not have marked for VFD an article he had already marked for CW, because that's proposing two different treatments at the same time. Aleister: The prior VFD on this article (June 2009) is here. Apparently, huffing all the period-of-history pages was considered and rejected then. Spıke¬ 12:53 12-Jul-10
Comment: I think there are times when VFD is appropriate for a rewrite, to build consensus about whether the rewrite is indeed superior to the original. Here, though, it's obvious. pillow talk 18:35, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
Or if the article in question is something well known such as the recently deleted and replaced Final Fantasy page. --Wilytank 00:48, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
ADMINS: This nomination has been withdrawn and the page has been rewritten; everyone's a little confused about what to do with this, but it seems appropriate to me to close it... agree? Cheers pillow talk 18:11, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Five years of anonymous editing have done nothing for this article. Short, unfunny, and repetitive cruft. Disintegrate.Saberwolf116 23:47, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Been here ages, always been short 'n' shit. Nothing links to it, it hasn't been edited in forever, and killing it would be a kindness. --UU - natter10:17, Jul 12
Delete. A one-paragraph book review, followed by a one-paragraph bio, and scads of red-links. Spıke¬ 11:58 12-Jul-10
My decision? Delete --Wilytank 12:50, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.. Junior Uncyclopedia. Detention after which you will be the first once to sprint to the German machine gun nest. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:35, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
Decision in VFDSaberwolf116 23:44, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Absolute bollocks. Oh, and strong whiff of vanity/cyberwotsit. --UU - natter10:17, Jul 12
Lrn 2 write n00b. Sad that author has such problems with fellow WoW players or that he contemplates a violent solution. But don't take it out on us. Spıke¬ 12:00 12-Jul-10
Obliterate. Author was apparently so ashamed, he blanked the page at one point. How sad. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 8:57 AM 7/12/10
Delete.. I'll just take down your testiculars you 'orrible little scribbler. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:40, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Horrible writing about nothing. Author careens from the encyclopedia cliché to chattiness to give form to this article with no substance. Spıke¬ 12:05 12-Jul-10
Disintegrate. I was kind of going "meh" to the article until Chuck Norris. Saberwolf116 23:39, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Now this is rubbish, straight to the knackers yard but the story of a flesh eating horse (or horses) is a myth from the Labours of Heracles. I doubt if this writer was aware of the connection but I wanted to share this with the wider community within the basement walls of VFD.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:33, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Now, this here's a fahn parody of Dixie English, boy. (Jes' fahn.) And it turns some neat phrases. "Like a ton of proverbial tons" reminds me of the way a coworker described a fracas in the corporate world: Rats leaving a sinking rat. Get rid of "Background," which gives away the con; of "Trivia," which is listcruft, and change Amos Moses to the guy's "real" name: It helps the "encyclopedia" con for article names to be played straight. And fewer balls and buttocks. Spıke¬ 18:52 9-Jul-10
Keep. Not totally bad. Paizuri needs to add his comment below to it, though, as it sums up the county better than the article does. Rabbi TechnokvetchContribsFOXES 12:38, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (6)
Meh. Pretty substandard, use of improper English, etc... —Pelozurian (talk) 09:56, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This county-cruft includes listcruft, shameless humping of external web sites in the .cx (means sex?) domain, lack of illustrations, lack of grammar, nonsense year numbers including ample History-of-the-Future, and mostly trite complaints about Essex, like that it has a bunch of low-lifes who supposedly define it. Spıke¬ 02:24 6-Jul-10
Delete. Per above, especially since it has no images and stupid humor overall.--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Saturday, 10:43, July 10 2010 UTC
Delete. Of the genre, "Joey, pick a figure of speech (second only to 'create a fantasy character') and stand up in front of the class for ten minutes talking about it." So "smart" it's dumb. Spıke¬ 11:26 11-Jul-10
Delete. Do it for the "lepricons." Nonsense numbers. Most residents are from somewhere else. Bus system doesn't work. Even a Russian Reversal toward the end. Nothing specific about Columbus except to name two of its suburbs. Paizuri, let's not redirect to Columbus, Georgia; that wouldn't help anyone. The proper way to let the reader know we have nothing funny to say about Columbus is a red link. Spıke¬ 11:32 11-Jul-10
Delete. If Christopher Columbus had seen this he would have changed his mind in 1492 about sailing the ocean blue. The fool. Aleister 16:52 11 7
Delete. There are 77777777777777777777777777777777 reasons to delete this crap.--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Sunday, 05:17, July 11 2010 UTC
Keep. Blasphemy! They're both good, this one is better imnho. But my question is, when you go to it, it changes the sidebar and even my data on top of the page italic! How does it do that, what's the code? What's the frequency, Count? Anyway, keeper yo. Aleister 21:44 7 7
jkl;fcvnjoqjovnkasdfjoagh jkiojioprqwjioSDF90JIODFIO --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 5:56 PM 7/7/10
Keep. I don't care about the other one. Just 'and magic happens' makes this one great, and a very nice satire of the site as a hole. Er, whole. Myocardialinfarction 02:18, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. My vampiric cabbage could do better! Except this one actually has a decent title, unlike some of the others... but they should all go! But this one is cute. It really is... it should be kept. No! Deleted! No! AAARGH! *flees* ~ Lyrithya*shifty eyes*(words) (actions) -- 20100708 - 04:41 (UTC)
Delete. Fuck tradition. This is exactly why I celebrate Festivus. pillow talk 20:42, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. A Festivus miracle this is not. --Sf1317:06 EST 8 July, 2010
Delete. I thought the second paragraph was really up there with the best comic writers active today but the rest was crap. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:45, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. How many of these would be considered too many? --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:59, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
Are there any more? The one up for VFD is the only one I knew of. But they've both been around for a long long time, and have their followers and people camping in the parking lot. Aleister 00:13 8 7 MMX
Have you checked out EBG13? I'm sure there's more, but they'd tend to fall through rational search filters due to their lack of actual words.--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:48, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
Keep Actually I really like this article. A definite keep. --Some Idiot 08:42, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Needs editing and a name change, but where else are we going to find a page about Uncy currency complete with pics? Someone edit this, namechange it, and whoola! Aleister 22:52 5 7
Did an edit sweep, removed first person and most stupid content, changed name to "Sophia Dollars", and enlarged the pics which are the only real good thing about the page.Aleister 2:21 6 7
Bit short, dontcha think?
Keep. Still, seems decent now. Couldn't be arsed to check the history and see what it was, mind... but besides the shortness I kind of like it. Ish. ~ Lyrithya*shifty eyes*(words) (actions) -- 20100708 - 04:49 (UTC)
Delete. Per Skinfan13. To me, the first-person approach is fatal: author is writing about himself. The shooped photos of banknotes are fun and should be revived in some real article. Spıke¬ 12:10 4-Jul-10
Aleister again resolves my complaint--but through manic subtraction. What's left is largely a vehicle for the illustrations. Can this article actually acquire a theme? Spıke¬ 02:28 6-Jul-10
Delete. Inherently flawed concept, bad tone, bad jokes, etc. Those are the three issues here.--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Monday, 11:44, July 05 2010 UTC
Comment. Hmmm. I like the pictures, I like the article concept, but I'm not liking the presentation. The first person appraoch is annoying and the title is a little unrelated and boring, but there are little bits of good here... Can't decide one way or another. --SirSF13(Talk)GUNWotMRotMFBotMVFHSKMaj.ΥΣΣ01:52 EST 4 July, 2010
More people are wrong than right about this after a week. Keepterised. I still think it's pointless though. --UU - natter08:20, Jul 12
Weak keep. It's mildly funny in places, it rambles in others, but at least it's got a theme. But I don't care what you think of Christianity or childhood obesity. Spıke¬ 11:40 3-Jul-10
Keep I've made some improvements and I think it's good enough to survive--Some Idiot 08:42, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
It can't be ICU'd because it was created three years ago; ICU is for new articles. Just sayin. —Pelozurian (talk) 08:47, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
If Falcon went to the trouble to save it, I'll swing my vote. Maybe a little more work would fix it even betterest. Aleister 22:58 5 7
Hey, I've got a nickname now! Falcon... I like it! --Some Idiot 01:20, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. One day this will be VFD'ed. Aleister 12:04 3 7
Delete.. One day is all a mayfly has. Just think of that if you read this again. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:29, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. It's a list of random things that fit a too broad category. This makes it meaningless in the end. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:56, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Made some improvements, check them out if you want... --Some Idiot 09:01, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Towncruft about how much this town is stupid, full of sheep, and how the people suck. A list at the bottom. No funny.--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Saturday, 11:24, July 10 2010 UTC
Delete. Drugs. Drunks. Losers. Say something new! and say it without obscenity--not that I mind it, but it is not humor when your article has no other. And "The middle of fucking no where"? Can't be--that's where I am. And you. Spıke¬ 23:43 10-Jul-10
EXTERMINATE! —Pelozurian (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Dead end article, not very funny, seemingly unfinished and unedited since June. Rabbi TechnokvetchContribsFOXES 19:29, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
Disintegrate. I'm an atheist, but this article clearly doesn't love up to its title. Poorly written and unfinished. Saberwolf116 22:22, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. How to vote delete on this article: Step 1. Open your eyes. Step 2. Think.--SirHELPMETalk(more? --> CUNROTMNOTMPlebUSSPeesSK)On Saturday, 10:35, July 10 2010 UTC
Delete. I welcome ridicule of the Catholic Church--but this is a ranting bash. Spıke¬ 22:52 10-Jul-10
Delete. Fun fact: my mum used to teach here when I was a kid. Other fun fact: this stubby little towncruft article sucks. --UU - natter08:44, Jul 9
Delete. Gang rape? "A long feud...since the dawn of time"? Article has nothing real and specific to say about the place, except to list certain residents by name. Spıke¬ 13:09 9-Jul-10
Delete. If 'taint vanity, 'tis random bollocks. --UU - natter11:19, Jul 9
Delete. But t'is. From its nonsense beginning, to its conclusion, "He mistook me for a corpse and buried me. The creep"--article makes no effort to give the reader anything to relate to. Cocaine-fed editing. Spıke¬ 13:21 9-Jul-10
Obliterate. What an incoherent pile of BUTT POOP! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:21 PM 7/9/10
"WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?" This is poor gamecruft. Also, if the subject is actually a game using ASCII text instead of graphics, it's probably obsolete by two decades. Article begins with a quote, supposedly from the reader, on the reader's reaction, setting the stage for an article about the article. Spıke¬ 13:16 9-Jul-10
Delete. I will be forever baffled why people want to write bollocks about a general bollocky subject anyway. Double waste of time and effort. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:33, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
KILL IT WITH FIRE! Huzzah! --Sf1315:37 EST 9 July, 2010
Keep. Needs a good edit but has been around on the site for last five years. Not saying it's brilliant or particularly something I find that good - but I still don't think it has to take the long walk. I see it was primarily the work of a user called 'Wonder Woman' - so if it is a bit pervy, perhaps it could be taken into care by someone who wants to rewrite this and updating it with a David Carradine joke. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:48, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
Change to keep Per Socky's rewrite. Saberwolf116 00:25, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (0)
Delete. Great writer, unfunny article. Saberwolf116 00:45, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Crap. Unless Romartus plans to rewrite it right now, a blank slate is probably better than this. --UU - natter15:17, Jul 5
Delete. Book burning time. --Wilytank 22:33, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
I would rather take this article for TLC if possible rather than delete it. Will probably lose 99%. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:38, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
Weak, weak, abstain. Fine, Socky. I'll give you a chance. --Wilytank 01:39, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
For Reverted back to Nov. 29, '007 Tom Mayfair edit. This page was created and worked on by Zim and other established users, and guarded for a time by them before the IP's took it. Needs some cleanup, and chucking Chuck Norris, but putting it up and then quickly adding the numbers up and it's gone (sob) before Zim wakes up from his hangover, makes me fear for anything that doesn't have a feature tag on it. Aleister 13:22 30 6 MMX
Did an edit sweep and a revert to a 2007 version after 5 no votes were on the board. Please take another look. It's not Gone With The Wind but probably not VFDable. Aleister 23:54 1 7 MMX
Delete. More amazingly dull Jesuscruft. If deleted it should be removed from {{Unwanted Jesii}} as well. —Pelozurian (talk) 10:15, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Merge {{Unwanted Jesii}} with {{Jesii}}? Or does that involve value judgements about what is unwanted? Spıke¬ 12:02 30-Jun-10
Delete. Essentially another extemporaneous ramble about a made-up character. Needs a point or a theme. Spıke¬ 12:00 30-Jun-10
Disintegrate.Saberwolf116 12:34, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Started out as a keeper but quickly turned into an unpolished turd with all the lists and randomness. Besides there are plenty of articles on Jesus. Do we really need to keep one like this? --—John Lydon 16:11, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Not bad enough either. Interesting, in fact. Aleister 10:10 30 6 MMX
Keep. Plenty bad--was it sporked from Wikipedia, or is the author just a nerd?--but easily saveable. One theme might be an article full of double entendres, with protein as a euphemism for semen. Spıke¬ 13:02 30-Jun-10
Keep. Inoffensive and easily salvageable. pillow talk 20:41, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
Die I felt like I was back in tenth grade biology class with that dirty teacher who always got to close to my danger area. I didn't like that. --—John Lydon 16:03, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
It's so dumb, yet it made me laugh... oh, the horror. I haven't the heart to vote either way. O_o *runs in terror* ~ Lyrithya*shifty eyes*(words) (actions) -- 20100708 - 04:53 (UTC)
Nothing clear after over a week - keepticated. --UU - natter08:48, Jul 9
EXTERMINATE!
Delete. The response (but not the answer!) is in 
Shit-doo --
Keep. It has many funny and pretty smart lines and concepts. Read the whole thing, and it held my interest. Clever at more than a handful of moments. The band is made up, not a real band, but a satire of a metal band consisting of a guy and his cat. 
Obliterate. 
Game:Do NOT click any links!/clickYAA and so on
Meh. —
Question. Can't you just replace the current article with your rewrite, since that's pretty much the point of Conservation Week? —
KEEP! They are very distinct articles, one makes my laugh and one makes me cry. (Don't take away my joy & sorrow!) ~ 
Comment. How many of these would be considered too many? --
Weak, weak, abstain. Fine, Socky. I'll give you a chance. --
