This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Delete: All the links are red (all the links are red). When they should be blue (when they should be blue). I got down on my knees (got down on my... mAttlobster. (hello) 23:55, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. this should be QVFD. --Mn-z 00:17, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete: Most of the links are red (most of the links are red). When they should be blue (when they should be blue). I got down on my knees (got down on my... mAttlobster. (hello) 23:56, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. qvfd bad. --Mn-z 00:18, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
As per orginator request when he/she/it asked SOMEONE PLEASE FINISH IT. - Let's put it out of it's/our misery. User:PuppyOnTheRadio/debFriday, 02:06, Mar 19 2010 UTC
Delete When I selected 'get the fork after school', I went onto a screen which displayed an inventory with no fork. That's sloppy people, sloppy. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:01, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. and I do believe this article cyber-bullies User:YesTimeToEdit (well, not really, but its still bad). --Mn-z 00:29, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. More tedious warcruft scribbling. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:09, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. All of the above; but the intro is also a case study in bad writing. Start by telling me what my conclusion will be; mention penis in the second sentence, use encyclopedia clichés ("have often been considered...by most"), add randomness (Cuba? Abraham Lincoln?), and marvel over your "awesome phrases." Spıke¬ 11:21 18-Mar-10
the fuck is that --Roman Dog Bird 17:28, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
Keep Sorry Puppy I can't agree with you. There are many, many pages linking to this page including many deletion reasons which do not show up in "what links here". People will wonder "what was that thing, and how did that page get deleted? Oh the page explaining it was deleted at VFD". I see no reason to huff this just because we will probably never have another V week. This page actually is useful as Uncyc history. MrNFork you! 01:58, Mar 18
Keep. per MrN9000 --Mn-z 02:02, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. per above. Ever see MTU as a deletion reason and wonder what that means? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 06:56, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. - This is my favorite "____ Week". Perhaps we should consider kicking it up again? --Kip > Talk•Works•• 18:09, Mar. 18, 2010
Delete
Delete. If we are going to do it again then we should do it. If we aren't then we should kill it. User:PuppyOnTheRadio/debThursday, 01:52, Mar 18 2010 UTC
Delete Seems pointless to delete it. But then Uncyc is pointless in a fantastic way. mAttlobster. (hello) 02:05, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete What the scone based spunk monkey am I doing playing this 'game' at 2am with signed version of Masterchef in the background? I clicked on 'go back to bed' and something happened and then it didn't and then....well I don't know. mAttlobster. (hello) 02:11, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
Gamecruft --Kip > Talk•Works•• 18:10, Mar. 18, 2010
Delete. poorly done and not funny. --Mn-z 21:00, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. found it while catting images. It is basically a messy political rant, and there isn't anything that a future wouldn't think of in 10 minutes. --Mn-z 00:56, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Making sport exclusively of one side might appeal to...the other side. Except that it's 38 years later and most of the chapters of the Nixon Fan Club have disbanded. Spıke¬ 01:06 17-Mar-10
Delete. Concept's on board and ready to sail, execution's face down in the water, turning blue. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:22, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - Subject has potential, but the article is crap. The map is the only thing that made me chuckle. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 14:46, Mar. 17, 2010
Comments
Comment. When "one side" and/or "the other side" represent 1/3 to 1/2 of a major country you're not going to have problems with in-jokes or vanity. Hell, that's pretty damn close to "mass appeal". Political humor is, in theory, just fine. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:17, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
I agree, and do it all the time on UnNews. But Mn-z is right, this one is a rant. Spıke¬ 01:23 17-Mar-10
Delete. little used template. . --Mn-z 00:21, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Not bad for an "approves" template, but it looks like its real purpose is to promote a useless category and a blog no one's heard of. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 16:49, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. The category is useless except as canned humor (where the joke is 22 years old). Spıke¬ 17:59 17-Mar-10
Delete. - Mr. Gorbachev, get rid of this cruft. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 18:22, Mar. 18, 2010
I sort of merged the two, but there wasn't that much worth keeping in pregnant. --Mn-z 01:29, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
delete & redirect to pregnancy. --Mn-z 00:13, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.Pregnant was competently written, but Pregnancy did everything better. Pregnancy ends abruptly, and Pregnant can't really help it. Spıke¬ 01:57 16-Mar-10
Kept Sorry, I'm not convinced the people voting here (except Syndrome) knew what this cat was for. I see no reason it delete it unless we delete V week. Check "what links here" more often chaps. MrNFork you! 00:11, Mar 18
Delete FUCK THIS SHIT!!!! FUCK IT! mAttlobster. (hello) 02:01, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
There's a new user whose sole purpose seems to be to make a pocketful of tiny edits to this page. No real improvements so far, though. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 16:29, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
The effort of Timmytime to paddle this article sideways into acceptability slightly precedes its VFD nomination. Spıke¬ 17:12 17-Mar-10
Delete. redundant with the better named Category:Reagan. I dislike verbose category names, as they make categorization difficult. --Mn-z 00:21, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
Reagan smash! --Kip > Talk•Works•• 00:25, Mar. 17, 2010
Delete. Yup, we only need the one. Spıke¬ 00:27 17-Mar-10
Someone has specked his drink. Starts out as a clever alternative explanation for the lyrics of a popular song. (Not that I know it.) Ends with listcruft, stupidity, vulgarity, insults to the reader, and possible vandalism. Fixable. Spıke¬ 23:04 16-Mar-10
Yes kinda funny and satirical article.suppose it does get deleted.i cant imagine something much better.i mean it makes its point clear about souljah boy's horrible music..Jupiterfox 17-Mar-10
Delete. "he was a retard" is not clever. --Mn-z 00:04, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
Changed my mind. "Fixable" would require rewriting, start-to-finish. And for what? Spıke¬ 01:29 17-Mar-10
Delete. Keep that school project paper for a bit longer, though. It made me laugh out loud. --Wilytank 13:26, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
It just so happens we needed an illustration for the Read Me First page for budding cub reporters on UnNews. Spıke¬ 16:06 17-Mar-10
Delete. It starts off OK but looks as if the writer got bored and ends up in the Sea of Drivel. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:45, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
Yooooooouuuuuuu --Kip > Talk•Works•• 14:47, Mar. 17, 2010
Delete Either delete this or give me some of Happytimes Crack. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:35, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Kept No VFD Tag. If I don't do this from time to time you buggers will forget even more... VFD tags must be added. Don't nominate again for a few weeks. MrNFork you! 00:16, Mar 18
Keep I know some of the article's history, and the three versions are so that various models of 3-D glasses will actually work on the image, but not all 3-D glasses. With the 3-D film influx likely to continue this seems, as Opty says, harmless. And an interesting addition in this form. Aleister in Chains 1:45 17 3 mmx
Delete. Fakey religion, wibble wibble wibble. --Count of Monkey Crisco 13:36, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Burn. Who is Thomas Baron Deery? This is utter nonsense and feels like a Livejournal entry.--Jtaylor1 15:42, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Cruft about a made up religion. --Wilytank 16:00, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. "There is no telling what the future holds for [this article], but it will be interesting to see where this crazy bunch of hippy ass mofos end up." Not. Spıke¬ 16:06 16-Mar-10
Keep I was about to vote delete, but seeing that Poopy forgot to tag the page with {{VFD}} (POTR, see my note below in the comments section wherein I remind you to tag pages you nominate), I clicked edit, and there the Korean interwiki link was brought to my attention. This article is featured on the Korean Uncyclopedia, and every page is illustrated with images, which probably makes the game a lot better. Please check it out before voting. It really helps to see what's happening instead of just reading it and assuming a 12-year-old wrote it. I should be getting to bed but I'll copy the images to the English wiki tomorrow if no one beats me to it. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 08:28, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comment. Now that it matches the Korean Version, did it become good? --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:39, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
"Good" is subjective. I like it. I could write a Fisher-Price style retrospective about its virtues, but instead I'll sum the game up by saying it's like Sim City meets I Wanna Be The Guy meets Mr. Bean. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 02:27, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. By clicking links in relative locations and a decent knowledge of Sim City I surmise this is sporked verbatim and the game is shit. The images do not help. This thing is Korea's problem now. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:29, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete It's like a twelve year old wrote it. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:54, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Seems to be the work of an orphan who has wandered into this wiki by accident. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:16, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
I'm not naming names, but don't forget to tag pages with {{VFD}} when you nominate them. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 08:28, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Keep It offers randomness online and it delivers randomness online. Not one of the selling points of Uncyclopedia, but it's complete and coherent. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 22:16, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Keep 4 sur' Feature. Just looked at it for about 30 seconds and have had the biggest laughs I've had for days. Thanks for pointing me to this. Can't wait to finish typing this so I can go look at it again. Seriously. Aleister in Chains 18:51 16 3 MMX
Delete. Not random enough. Doesn't deliver what it says on the tin. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:32, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete - What Romartus said - if you've got the whole scone of random, spunk the cat man, spunk the cat. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:19, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Comment May I request that the admins hold back on deleting this until there's a clear majority greater than the usual 5? This game is huge and it would take some time to look at it and make a fair judgement. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 19:57, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Kept Not enough to kill it. MrNFork you! 08:28, Mar 17
Keep. I'm in the middle of fixing this one up. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 07:56, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
Well, it the Knocc Out, definition orginal baby gangster approach me like you hard, muthafucker i'mma bank ya shank ya, with my fuckin shank, if i havta Dr Dre and Snoop Doggy Dogg are fuckin actors prankstas, studio gangstas, bustas but this time yer dealin with some real muthafuckers. TheManInBlack. 00:49, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Keep For a Star Trek Series Guide it seems fine and actually quite detailed, and if worked on it could only improve. I had a few laughs just skimming it. So, why? Aleister in Chains 2:06 16 3 mmx
Keep. savable and not totally worthless. Should get a rewrite tag. --Mn-z 01:13, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Not too bad. You would expect an article by hardened Trekkies lovingly listing every single episode with just enough changed to claim they were practicing "humor." Spıke¬ 01:46 16-Mar-10
Delete
Delete. SEE YOUNG NIGGAS LIKE ME WILL BREAK YOU OFF SOMETHING, BUT CLAIMIN' MY CITY BOY, DRE, YOU AIN'T FROM COMPTON TheManInBlack. 00:42, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
But of course, Keep Read this page long ago and it was a good piece. Now, you b*s(a%rD, I will have to go work on it. Grrrrr. But, of course, keep. Aleister in Chains 2:01 16 3 mmx
Keep. not really that good, but too notable. And its sort of functioning as a portal. I think we are better off keeping it. If it doesn't exist I could see the causal reader saying, "ZOMG! they can't even make an article about relgion, this place is teh suxxors" --Mn-z 01:37, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. I hate it with a passion, but there is enough of merit in there that it could be salvaged with a decent re-write, and I'm drooling to have a go at this. Worst case - if we are going to delete this, could whoever huffs pop a copy into my namespace? SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009Tuesday, 04:47, Mar 16 2010 UTC
Delete and redirect to something not so fucking retarded. TheManInBlack. 00:22, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Interminable (only a problem as it has no point to make) and listy. If it doesn't exist, Mn-z, I could see the casual reader saying, "As this is a wiki, I bet I am free to write a new article on religion!"Spıke¬ 02:00 16-Mar-10
Comments
re: spike *:But, its probably going to come back worse. Maybe we should create a religion portal or something. --Mn-z 02:06, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
kept Someone clean this up please? Maybe actually make this into a portal type page with just a small introduction? Remove most of the crap, and leave lots of links to other related articles. MrNFork you! 09:31, Mar 16
Delete.Yugo Hugo II and Yugo Hugo III are biting the dust right now (below). I is a more complete article but does everything wrong: God/Satan, nonsense numbers, techno-babble, rambling. Altogether dippy. Spıke¬ 23:39 15-Mar-10
Delete. per ending the dynasty. --Mn-z 23:48, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Full blown cack-a-liner. Looks like something you put in a random language translator and then sprinkle in added dumbo to make it rise to utter bollocks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:41, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Weak keep I can see the method in the madness. With some cleanup, it might be decent, but I'm afraid that reading it might still be too much like work. --Mn-z 01:29, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
It was a lot like work. Taking ten paragraphs to, ultimately, define Narrative by illustration, is clever but a waste of time. Belongs in a different namespace unless it gets a lot funnier. Spıke¬ 12:49 12-Mar-10
Keep. It was acceptable until some IP took a leak on it. It's easy to spot the sudden change in content and style. This version would be the ideal point to restore it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:18, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete...OK I get it writer. You know this is crap so why bother writing all this down and posting it in the Limp Sprinkler of Unknowledge known as Uncyclopedia? A true appreciation of your work can be found down the hall by the shit chute known as Encyclopedia Dramatica...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:03, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Quite boring --Wilytank 16:08, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
Slurp!,Slurp!, Gag!,Gag! --Roman Dog Bird 20:17, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Don't forget the {{VFD}} tag. Spıke¬ 20:59 11-Mar-10
Just to add, the last edit on it has been in 2008. No-one is in a hurry to clean this up. - - - Pie+Muffin = GreatnessBarf- + -Observe 15:44, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
My good man, they are clipping their coupons. Spıke¬ 20:39 12-Mar-10
Delete.The Chi go down to the ang, when the Pi go see the po after the Li saw mi but the Wa was at the bou.--Count of Monkey Crisco 23:06, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
Zût alors! Always-endearing English-as-a-Second-Language ("People in glass houses shouldn't through parties") but this is essentially a sandbox, periodically begging the reader to keep going. Spıke¬ 23:30 15-Mar-10
Delete. OK, I get it, residents of Poland sound a lot like the word for a long stick. This pun didn't require a list of five sections, followed by a section with a list. Spıke¬ 21:48 15-Mar-10
Delete. Short and utterly atrocious. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:43, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Author is assembling an alternate-reality dynasty rivaling Hajime Socialist Republic but using correct English. Even Yugo Hugo I is VFD-ready, with its reliance on nonsense numbers and techno-babble. Spıke¬ 19:55 15-Mar-10
Comment. There's plenty of room on VFD. If you deem something VFD ready don't suggest it, take the shot. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:04, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Longer but still utterly atrocious. Paragraphs that end mid-sentence indicate an article abandoned in late 2006. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:46, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
woke up to find a prostitute in his Like father, like son. Spıke¬ 19:57 15-Mar-10
Delete. A dumb article. There are hundreds of people in the US Army that could write a clever satire based on the US Army--I've seen a couple pieces here from the US Air Force--and a couple may know about Uncyclopedia. Start over. Spıke¬ 22:42 13-Mar-10
pooooooooooooooop --Roman Dog Bird 22:48, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 23:00, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Not having been there, let me tell you about the US Army: It is widely understood that the best way to ensure success is to requisition equipment that you don't need, in order to trade it for stuff that you need desperately but your superiors would never approve. The only way to defeat the enemy is to interpret your orders creatively, deny receiving them, or deliberately disregard them once you have an airtight excuse. There is a small chance that your career as an officer may be ruined by Congressional inquiry or internal scapegoating. And that you will die taking a hill while diplomats are negotiating to give it back. There is a large chance of becoming a hero by disobeying orders to complete a mission, provided you complete the mission. This is all well-known, dead-serious, and yet tons funnier than our current article. Spıke¬ 17:31 14-Mar-10
Delete. Apart from the fact that all the sections are blank, except Section 1, which would be better blank, not a lot to complain about here. Spıke¬ 22:48 13-Mar-10
Delete. looks like illogicopedia, only badly formatted. --Mn-z 22:56, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
HEE HEE HEE HEE *snort snort snort* --Roman Dog Bird 23:10, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Keep I'm embarrassed to say that despite the complete lack of most redeeming qualities, I did find this amusing. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:22, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
Keep For sure, I found it very funny. And the concept should exist in at least one article on Uncy. Feature. (I've already done did my mandatory vote-for-save edits) Aleister in Chains 13:34 14 3 mmx
added pics, more edits. If saved maybe rename "HowTo:Write articles while drunk" or "Sober is for pussies", or,betrest yet "HowTo:Write articles while drunk sober is for pussies". Al de'Chain, a few minutes later
A no-brainer. Similar to Narrative in illustrating by doing, but this one lacks any redeeming qualities, and can't be so bad it's good because of the ease of re-creating one like it. Spıke¬ 21:23 13-Mar-10Rescinded. Thanks, Aleister. It's still crap but it made me laugh. Spıke¬ 17:34 14-Mar-10
You do know that one of our most popular articles, in terms of out of-wiki-notability, was written by an inebriated author? That sort of ruins the concept of making fun of drunken editing.--Mn-z 16:27, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
How about renaming it HowTo:Write articles while extremely drunk Aleister in Chains 16:48 pi day
Delete. I don't want to go on deletion crusade against specific active authors. However, this one is particularly bad. It consists mainly of human-on-cartoon sex (both straight and gay) and references to the deleted Mama Luigi. --Mn-z 15:19, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Article endears itself to me by begging for its survival in the first sentence. That is the only nearly funny part of it. Spıke¬ 17:36 13-Mar-10
re: spike's comment They are both "weak", and if they were the creations of a retired user or ip, I'd probably go ahead and nom them on VFD. However, I'm afraid that nominating all of them might scare away the author. And, its our policy assume that writers will probably get better as they become more familiar with our standards of humor and get the silliness out of their systems. If we only nom the author's worst articles, it will hopefully send him a signal that his writing system needs improvement without scaring him off the wiki. --Mn-z 21:50, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
My only remaining hope for Jupiterfox (see my comment on Pineapple titties below) is that he meet up with Storytime and that the meeting results in a magical transformation of both of them into their literary opposites. Spıke¬ 22:51 13-Mar-10
Sorry; I don't know what he's written; only that he was on the Forum complaining about how the rest of us are all so wicked smahht. Spıke¬ 17:38 14-Mar-10
look spike ill tell yuo the truth.i can actually write pretty well.when it comes to academic writing,my content is A+ material.itS just that i dont think humor and comedy should be that intelligent.i simply have a silly and random sense of humor.im cant change my literary style cause i enjoy what i write and find it funny.now if that dosent fit on here,than so be it.ill just keep doing what im doing.in terms of improving writing so i can keep stuff on here, i could partner up with serious writers so i can have somehting that fits on here betterJupiterfox March 13, 2010 (UTC)
You can always do that, and there are many organized ways here of helping that to happen. What I was suggesting is that you partner up with a writer we've found of equal unseriousness, just to see what the result is! Spıke¬ 19:11 14-Mar-10
Delete. at first I was like, "this is bad enough to be turned into an inside joke." But after thinking about it, its very nearly cyberbullying, and brings up "bad memories". I replaced to names in the "Parody Film" section to get rid of the blatant references a specific user and the drama relating to his leaving the wiki. But even if that section was deleted entirely, I think the concept/page name was too much reference in itself to old drama. --Mn-z 15:04, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. The writer forgot he was supposed to be writing for a humour website instead of a pornowiki. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:42, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. As I noted in the comments when the article was created "Dammit, Jupiterfox" --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:29, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
mm'kay the article came off as cyberbullying but i was really trying to acknoledge (that user who made slappys angels) i mean i didnt say (that user)sucked dick or anything.i actually liked his writing.i apologize for the cyberbully issue but thats not what i was intending.Jupiterfox
Keep. ya know this article was funny.good luck finding a man with those kinds of breasts.although having them can be useful.you can have youurself a nice glass of juice any time you want.TITTTIESSSSS. Jupiterfox 02:59, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
You need to talk to master Storytime in the Forum. Spıke¬ 12:50 13-Mar-10
Keep I didn't find that much wrong with keeping it on the site, probably thousands of other worse than this. And the thought of anyone fondling Margaret Thatcher's breasts is funny to me. Keeping to my personal policy I'll go put in a few minutes work on it. Aleister in Chains 15:17 13 3 mmx
Ok, I think it's working out pretty well. Come on in and join the, ah, fun? Al 15:59 13 3 mmx
Keep. per the fix-ication. --Mn-z 23:20, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
Delete.Wolfox4777's other oeuvre. It has a theme, but it's not about anything. Spıke¬ 02:50 13-Mar-10Rescinded but not Keep; making love to Mr. Margaret Thatcher is still double-Ew! And why does a group of scientists have a name, anyway? Spıke¬ 23:39 13-Mar-10
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 02:56, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. A year-old WIP with all the loose ends tied by dumb IPs. The author archived his talk page without responding to my query about the game, so I take that to mean he's done with it. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 08:39, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comment. Once again you stinks at links, good sir, your confidence in your ability to use uncyclopedia markup vastly outstrips your actual ability to use uncyclopedia markup, a problem further exacerbated by your failure to check whether or not your intended computer code was valid in achieving your desired results. Additionally a game would best be reviewed from the start as to maintain the writer's suggested context and to allow a more fair judgment by potential reviewers instead of disrupting narrative progress. Make sure the link clicks properly before you nom something. I fixed it for you. The start of the game is in the main link.
And you, guvnor, are lacking in the finer arts of discourse. When gentlemen such as ourselves happen upon an allegation of poor quality leveled against an individual page, we consider the allegation to impugn upon that page alone and not said page's family, friends or distinguished social clubs. As such, until established precedent has been overthrown in a formal court of law, we will have to reach a gentlemen's agreement on how to approach the subject. (However, I would like to thank you for addressing my error in which I referred to said page with the incorrect title. I do hope that my grievous error was not inferred to be disrespect.) --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 02:18, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps I am being biased a little by my interest in the subject matter, but is userfication a possibility? (I have deliberately not specified who to userfy it to.) --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 20:26, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Agreed with userfication, as the predominant editor for this is still active, even if his work on this isn't. If said user doesn't want it, then he/she/it/them/sockpuppet can request delete in qvfd. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009Wednesday, 20:34, Mar 10 2010 UTC
I wouldn't be mad at that, but we shouldn't decide for him. It's a pain to move all those pages unless someone actually wants them. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 21:37, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Untouched, apart from a category added by MadMax, since June 2006. Oh - and not very good. Rabbi TechnokvetchContribsFOXES 14:39, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 15:44, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. For once written by someone who is possibly likes Brancaster except all the newcomers. Still, this is poorly executed and deserves removal.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:47, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Well-written, but it's essentially a stubby rant. And the topic--conflict between long-time residents and new arrivals--is hardly specific to there. Spıke¬ 17:31 13-Mar-10
Delete. I was expecting an article about sodomy and/or defecation. I was disappointed. --Mn-z 02:30, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. So too, probably, was the guy who remarkably put this in Category:Anatomy. Wolfox4777 (who left us on 14-Aug-06) thereby learned how to code an article. Otherwise, worthless. Spıke¬ 02:46 13-Mar-10 post-edited
Delete. largely untouched 2006 ip creation. --Mn-z 02:27, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Because, who would touch it? Three paragraphs typed for the sheer joy of not having to worry about all that stereotyping. Spıke¬ 02:42 13-Mar-10
Slurp!,Slurp!, Gag!,Gag! --Roman Dog Bird 20:13, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. RDB's rationale is the sound of "Toad & Drew Pickles Sucking Waluigi's dick." The article is a vehicle for much, much more of the same. The article isn't anything else, including funny. Spıke¬ 20:42 12-Mar-10
Delete. but at least he didn't turn into a hermaphroditic furry and impregnate himself like Luigi. --Mn-z 21:40, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete There is no way Uncyclopedia could possibly have a good article about Waluigi. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 00:16, March 13, 2010 (UTC)
Can this be rehoused somewhere? There is a lot of weird work in this. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:01, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
I saw "Harry Potter Spells" and thought "Mavis Beacon Teaches Jack-Hammering." This huge glossary is a good vehicle for humor, but isn't inherently funny. It needs a curator who has something in mind other than the joy of writing about horse-cock. Not Ace Attacker, though recently he has kept it from becoming even worse. Spıke¬ 10:47 11-Mar-10
Kept Someone strip out the crap though eh? MrNFork you! 02:53, Mar 13
Keep. Needs a plastic surgeon to remove some lists, but why delete? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:35, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. But really needs pics. --Wilytank 13:50, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Totally unfunny, starts with a cliché and doesn't get any better, morphing into a list. Only salvageable content: "a big jumble of stars that nobody can ever really make sense out of, and if they say they can, then they're lying, along with those people who can apparently tell the "difference" between Coke and Diet Coke." Wild at Heart, he who cleans up (Yell at me) 21:46, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.. Like reading a skin rash. Not advisable. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 01:22, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
The author of Libra set out to muse about Myself as a Libra, and cover any other topics that could be made to fit in a carefree and wacky way. Astrology-based articles could be really funny--UnNews carries Today's Horoscope that is really funny, in very small doses--even though it is impossible even for astrology to say anything definitive about 1/12 of the population essentially chosen at random. Whatever happens to this page (deletion or repair) should be done with a view to the 11 other articles. (My first two samplings, Scorpio and Sagittarius, revealed that there is no article.) Spıke¬ 21:56 2-Mar-10
He's gay! High point of this mudslinging rant is when Kid "developed a strong likeness [sic] for men." Spıke¬ 10:32 11-Mar-10
Delete'. The first paragraph cheerfully lets you know if you think gay jokes,rape and a Lord of the Rings allusions are just for you, read on. If only all crap articles were so considerate. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:59, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Perhaps one for Junior Uncyclopedia. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:45, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
Per Romartus. No one gets the 50-clones-with-different-adjectives treatment except Jesus. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 06:04, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
11th active nomination. --Mn-z 22:37, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Have already improved the form. I can save the text too. 15:06 PS--It's done. Spıke¬ 22:04 8-Mar-10
Keep I trust the SPIKERTRON! mAttlobster. (hello) 20:33, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
Keep Didn't read it before, but as it is now with a Spike makeover it got a few laughs out of me. Some of my best abductions have been by vans, so this brought back alot of memories.
Aleister in Change
Aleister in Change
Delete
Delete.. There is potential to be had here, but not in this form, unless someone has a burning desire to save it then I think it should go. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 14:42, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Admin, if kept, please rename to White van and adjust link from VFD archive. Spıke¬ 22:06 8-Mar-10
Kept Did I forget to say that? Oops! MrNFork you! 00:09, Mar 11
Comment. In the late 90's DC Comics and Marvel Comics teamed up to create Amalgam Comics, a series of fanservice wet dreams that published a series of miniseries featuring superheroes that were a hybrid of popular properties from both companies. User:Crablogger either has a hard on or a vendetta against that sort lived series and produced a number of dry, unfunny articles about Amalgam Comics. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:48, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
Indeed, as Amalgam Comics is linked to once in each of the first three lines. Spıke¬ 12:19 8-Mar-10
Delete. Random fictional characters, gay jokes and wibble. More from the Crablogger/Amalgam project. {—The preceding unsigned comment was added byCount of Monkey Crisco (talk • contribs)
Delete. The humor about this comic-book hero is of junior-high-school quality. Spıke¬ 12:25 8-Mar-10
I'm gonna sing the Doom song Template is neither alive nor full of mission goo. Almost everything in it is up for deletion. Closing admin, please delete Category:Zim too. Wild at Heart, he who cleans up (Yell at me) 21:45, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
Hear hear! Yes to both. Even if we have not yet deleted all the component articles, which were like bad movie sequels. Spıke¬ 22:03 8-Mar-10
Delete. Like Wild at Heart said below, send it to the room with the moose. --Wilytank 22:32, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. now effectively gutted. although, if the future, I'd suggest holding off on sectional template noms until all the cruft from the template is nommed. Otherwise, you run the risk of deleting the to-delete list. --Mn-z 22:40, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Comment I would hold on deleting the template until we know for sure its going to be useless. I'd suggest not deleting the category at all, as there are some userspace pages in there, and it would still be better than a pile of clutter. --Mn-z 23:01, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
On a related note, it appears that this template is causing the VFD template to double. --Mn-z 00:42, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
Fixed. Remember, {{Vfd}} in templates must be bracketed by <noinclude> or it is, well, included on every page that uses the template. Spıke¬ 01:44 9-Mar-10
I should have caught that, I was thinking a coding error was magically causing the template to double for some reason. --Mn-z 01:52, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Spıke¬ 11:13 9-Mar-10
Delete. Well I never felt more like deleting the Grues And I never thought, that I'd Never Seeing You Go Dave...Why'd ya haunt me this way,by Deleting the Grues.... I needed a song after looking at this..--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:03, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. As POTR said, this is the first page of the game. If this page survives because some stuffy admin decides the nom is invalid, then this page will have survived thanks to the author's poor organization skills. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 08:17, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
I will delete these pages if the consensus is to delete. Syndrome is wrong. MrNFork you! 10:30, Mar 10
...I'm wrong because...? Maybe we should move this page to Game:Kroz in order to "complete" the game? Or maybe move the entire thing to his userspace and forget about deleting it? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 18:55, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
We are not going to do anything with a page which is in userspace. The parts of the game which are not in his userspace can be voted on to delete, which is what we are doing now. The game should be removed from the game main page, as should anything linking from mainspace to userspace. MrNFork you! 23:12, Mar 10
The only page of the game not in Game: is the very first page. Like I said, it's being kept because of the author's poor organization skills. It would be but a trifle to move it to its right place and suppress the redirect. I would rather the first page be deleted too, not because I hate this game so much and I want it to die, but because I think the game should be treated as a whole unit and not broken up because of some unwritten rule and a mistake on the part of a Chuck Norris imitator. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 02:06, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
If the game was kept I would want it moved to mainspace. But... If the rest of the game is deleted, and this page is no longer linked from anywhere else I see no reason to start huffing user pages based on an assumption of intent which may or may not be true. Or... I think UN:N will apply if the rest is deleted, and that's certainly not grounds to make a special case to remove something which just don't matter. MrNFork you! 02:26, Mar 11
UN:N certainly applies, but those deleted game electrons are going to be sad and lonely without their leader. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 03:21, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This game is so bad, Chuck Norris using his physic powers to channel you into voting delete. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 08:13, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Comment.clicking those links doesn't really get me anywhere. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:20, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! There's not much text in here. There are a lot of images on the other hand. Some with text in them. Some with text below them. The problem is, none of it makes sense. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM12:04, 10 March 2010
Delete. Is this about the Kipling character, a computer program, or child sex? You don't know, do you? Spıke¬ 14:09 10-Mar-10
Delete. It's probably at its best version so far, and that makes me sad. --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:02, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! This article is just a piece of crap. It's stupid and not funny. Moreover, it's completely off-topical. I can't find any positives about it. (PS: I write User:Ptok-Bentoniczny/Ski jumping (together with Hiatus Hernia) and I was going to put it in main space). Together with this, Ski jumping (redirect page) should be deleted. SirPtok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 12:16, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This article's impossible chronology is a hint that author doesn't feel bound by concepts such as "theme." By all means replace it with PB's panoramic and funny version--to which we can then add numerous instances of The and otherwise make it read like English. Spıke¬ 14:07 10-Mar-10
EXTERMINATE! Has little to do about actual ski jumping. --Wilytank 16:55, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
CAUTION/UWAGA/POZOR -- As the article I had nominated has been already deleted, then I put my own version (combined with Hiatus' one) in the main space. So voting is done, and the article you will see now is mine, not nominated. SirPtok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 22:35, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Uncyclopedia needs a really good article on this unanimously objective journalist who was in the partisan tank, up to the day he apologized for forged documents on Bush but insisted that "the story they tell is true." The Rather in the title is a clever reference to the fact that those documents, allegedly from the 'Eighties, used the superscripting feature of Microsoft Word. Unfortunately, that is the only clever thing about this article, which is mostly cheap shots and charges that he was a Soviet spy. Spıke¬ 20:09 9-Mar-10
Delete. 100% potty-mouthed tripe, resembling vandalism of the site. Is author experimenting in creating an article that does everything wrong? Is this supposed to be "so bad, it's good"? And did you nominate it because you didn't even succeed in making it that bad? Spıke¬ 18:31 9-Mar-10
Well, if I read the article history correctly, it looks like 95% of this thing was written by OptyC. So, if he's nomming it for deletion, it's basically a self-nom and he could go through QVFD. Also, I suspect it was he who tricked me into giving it a Pee Review as though it were some kind of honest effort, nominated it, and subsequently called Mordillo a Jew faggot. I don't know. I'm not really sure what's going on with this thing. Delete it, I guess. pillow talk 19:20, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comment. This is a hard one (Groans from the cheap seats).. Actually it's worth keeping just for the Pee Review but that means keeping the crap article. It could stand in a cage as an example of the Best of Uncyclopedia Not... But if the consensus is to delete, I will not object. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:52, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
Explanation. I found this on QVFD. The first section is all that was there at the time. I was amusing myself by adding sections in the same crappy style as the first: a couple of lines about the subject followed by an invitation for the reader to suck the author's cock. I was expecting it to be deleted, but MrN decided it amused him as well. It amuses me, but I know full well it's shit. Also, I'm about done with it so... Oh, I supppose I should also mention that the whole Mordillo is a Jew faggot thing was just me playing the stupid noob IP schtick. In reality I have nothing but love for that Jew faggot. -OptyCSucks! CUN20:16, 9 Mar
Let me get this straight. While I was trying to write good stuff, including saving two sorry articles in this forum, you were deliberately writing crap, faking a Pee Review, faking a VFD nomination, slinging fake racism, and wasting the time of all concerned, just to see if you could "treek" people? And Mr.N., who once banned me for artificially holding a vote open to troll for volunteers, will not ban your ass for flagrantly gaming us because "it amused him" (your words)? I think you should get the fuck out.Spıke¬ 00:32 10-Mar-10
Spike, chill. Opti - really, you got better things to do as we all do. ~ 00:37, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Spike: I thought this article was funny. I spent several hours last time you got your knickers in a twist trying to explain why I banned you for 45 mins and you still don't get it, so I'm sure as hell not going to bother trying to explain this to you now. It is very different. MrNFork you! 07:58, Mar 10
Hyper: Cos you never wrote under a different name for a laugh right? Think about that one. MrNFork you! 07:58, Mar 10
Delete. The band sucks ass, but the page could have been funnier than this. --Wilytank 14:12, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
They're FAGGOTS! Unusually bad bandcruft. Several no-lifes have used the article to avoid creating a discussion page. I'll withdraw this if someone notes that they are actually FAGGOTS and that that is somehow notable. Spıke¬ 14:19 9-Mar-10
Delete. Trumpeting Randumbos...this is bad...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:54, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Though I'm more of a grindcore fan, I am partial to Waking the Cadaver. They're a decent band in my opinion, but this article is shit. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK]21:32 Mar 9 2010
Comments
I wouldn't think they're gay. Considering they have songs like "Pigtails are for Face Fucking" and "I know the Insides of Women". Their lyrical themes center around rape, gore and violence. --Wilytank 17:03, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
All right, then the article either has even less to do with reality, or all the gay-bashing is nuanced irony by a virtuoso writer. Bets in! Spıke¬ 18:24 9-Mar-10
Delete. This article ain't nothin' but bandcruft, so let's delete it like they do on the Discovery Channel, or something. --UU - natter11:02, Mar 9
DEEMED GAY. And all the band members want to be black. Bandcruft plus vanity plus nearly empty sections plus other typographical horrors, necessarily without any purpose in comedy, because this article has none. Spıke¬ 11:19 9-Mar-10 But it does have UU's signature at the bottom, for some reason.
Y'know those handy dandy buttons that appear above the editor window? The ones that occasionally take their time loading, and pop into place just as you're clicking on what you think is the top of the article, to put your cursor in the box and add the VFD template, so instead of doing that, it turns out you added your sig without realising? Yeah - those. Bastards, aren't they? --UU - natter11:32, Mar 9
deadly. It is deadly. This little rant is done with some skill in English, though it mixes in too much randomness, because the author really doesn't have much to say about the subject. So give it to your Peru editor.Spıke¬ 11:16 9-Mar-10
Delete Dreary, Dull, Diabolical, Dismal and drivel. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:57, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
No effort was made in the creation of this article. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:22, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. (Formerly Keep. Not so much skillful as guilelessly childish.) Spıke¬ 01:43 10-Mar-10
Comments
A replacement is taking shape at User:SPIKE/El Niño. Already better than the original, which y'all thought was much worse than I did, and doesn't use any of it. Illustration from NASA/JPL. Y'all may want to tug it in a few new directions. Spıke¬ 01:43 10-Mar-10
Keep. Sections 1 and 2 are pretty clever. Intro is all nagging, stereotypes, and swears--the standard junior-high-school stuff. Section 3 and beyond is listcruft. And it ends with a link to Matts tiny penis.Spıke¬ 02:56 9-Mar-10
Unless you-know-who arrives first with his BAN STICK!!!Spıke¬ 03:20 9-Mar-10
I rarely nominate on here, so missed that ruling - it doesn't invalidate the nom though, just potentially brings the ban gods down on my head. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009 04:10, 9/03/2010
The ruling wasn't delivered by the postman. It's right above the vote tables, trying its damnedest in six garish colors to attract attention. Spıke¬ 11:13 9-Mar-10
Yeah... outside of where it says "Rules ond regulations", which given that it's a rule you'd kinda expect it to be there, not buried down in a miasma of ugly formatting where I couldn't be bothered reading through to because, surprisingly, I thought I'd already reda the rules. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009Wednesday, 01:48, Mar 10 2010 UTC
Delete It has the stench of old beer in an open can. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:07, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
The Keep vote by Videogames4all (a contributor to the article) is unsigned, unpersuasive (we told you what was wrong with it!) and broke the bleeping VFD table! Epic fail! Spıke¬ 03:02 9-Mar-10
Comment. Nice try, but breaking the template does not stop the vote. This guy (gal?) was also responsible for the Sailor Moon articles we huffed last month. Even worse they admit it on their user page.--Count of Monkey Crisco 05:41, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
Counselor, this point did not make my case but was to damage the witness's credibility. Spıke¬ 11:11 9-Mar-10
Inphamy. It's a creative concept to let the super-villain write his own page, especially a boasting French one. Ze French accent is cute, though not done consistently. Lists, exclamation points, and external links have to go. Spıke¬ 12:10 8-Mar-10 PS--I will fix the above if this is kept.
Keep I didn't even look at it, but anytime Spike says he will fix it you know that a good page will emerge from the dreck. Just look at "The Hurt Locker" (not the page, the movie) which Spike rewrote after that woman director turned in a stub. Nice work. Aleister in Chains 13:22 8.3 p.s. I read the page, and laughed a few times. Well worth the saving. He's proud of his restraining orders! Maybe we should have an official Uncy 'Resraining Order template". Spike, of course, can expand and give this frenchy villian a wider universe to play in. Al in Chains, awhile later.
Delete. A bad comic book character article not by Crablogger. Mostly a list with some very, very short sections surrounding it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:37, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. The version you started out with was deletable. Your version is much better, except that the plot is overlong. The usual approach to a "failed re-write" is called Revert. But please don't. Spıke¬ 13:12 8-Mar-10
Keep. - Dude, was I too harsh? ~ 16:12, Mar 8, 2010
What, did you Pee Review this? What do you think that spilled bottle of sleeping pills beside the bed means?! Spıke¬ 19:14 8-Mar-10
Delete
Self Nom + Delete What an epic failure this author is. I say we delete his article and ban his ass. But seriously, this was a failed re-write of mine and I move to delete it. --SirSkinfan13Talk{< CUNRotMFBotMVFHΥΣΣMaj.SK>} 07:55 EST 8 Mar, 2010
Comments
Kept WTF are you doing skinfan13? MrNFork you! 11:51, Mar 9
Delete. Fuck... really? Grumbly, bitchy and self-admittedly without redeeming value at first, then there's the list. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:22, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
Any chance of some redeeming value in this pile of Crap yet? The said section title says it for me. Spıke¬ 12:22 8-Mar-10
Delete. Katie Kaboom was the weakest recurring segment in the otherwise funny show Animaniacs, but it was still ten times better than this crap. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:00, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. The manufactured bio is childish, toilet-based, and relates to nothing in reality. Spıke¬ 12:30 8-Mar-10
Keep. It's on topic, decently written, funny in places, and about something real. But creator "Webhead" has not been on for over three years; if we slap a [ICU] Rewrite on it, will anyone see it? I've never watched the show, but I'll give it a copy edit if someone will find illustrations. Spıke¬ 12:02 7-Mar-10
Delete
Delete. It's on topic but it's just really, really shabby. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:04, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Spike, ICU is for articles less than a week old. A Rewrite or Fix template would be more appropriate, but I'd prefer to have someone start over on this altogether if they wanted to have it. --RomanDogBird!!!!!:D :D :D :D :D :D :D 19:36, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
I stand corrected. It doesn't need to exist, but it can be whipped into shape. Spıke¬ 19:45 7-Mar-10
EXTERMINATE!
Delete. per above. --
Special:PrefixIndex/Game:A_minefield
Obliterate. 
Keep. per MrN9000 --
Comment. When "one side" and/or "the other side" represent 1/3 to 1/2 of a major country you're not going to have problems with in-jokes or vanity. Hell, that's pretty damn close to "mass appeal". Political humor is, in theory, just fine. --
I'd rather see 
Enough of this madness! --
Kill. 
Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 22:35, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
Absolutely It reads like a HTBSAJNF article. 
