This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Delete it. Then delete Nuck Chorris/Facts, the piece of listcruft it links to. butt head Spıke¬ 17:37 5-Jan-10
Delete. Actually, this was made in 2006, before the current Chuck Norris article I believe. But now, it's unfunny 2006-cruft. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!) 23:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
I meant it was a poor version of the Chuck Norris article before the current one. The current one is great. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:32, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Chuck. Barney. Princess Peach. Horny bears. Random as you like, in other words. Is there a point to having this? --UU - natter10:56, Jan 5
Delete. This article about nothing I care about beforehand fails to sell me due to its shifting tone. The first sentence of Sec. 1 hits my old hot-button, trying too hard to make froth sound encyclopedic: "The origin...is unknown, but some rumours say...." However, by the next section, we are spouses: "Now you´re saying: 'Wait a minute...' Of course...you dimwit." Yes, wait a minute: Make me care. Spıke¬ 17:07 5-Jan-10
Delete There is no point in having this. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:17, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Dumber than the average horny bear. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:08, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Medieval II: Total War
Keep
Delete
Delete. Heavy on lists and complaints. Light on good writing and humor. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:51, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. When I got to "List 3: Things that should be in all games" it struck me: This is how a Basement-dweller "makes a difference in the community." Spıke¬ 22:59 4-Jan-10
Delete. One of the few games I have actually played. This is just stupid/abusive rather than funny and has that tired old formula of ending everything in one dirty long dull list.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:25, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Even without an illustration, even about a character I've never heard of and that might not exist, an article could sell me. Not this one; the writer is too taken with his own turns of phrase. "(dreadful when that happens isn't it)" The article denies any relation to King Crimson, but mostly just name-drops from fantasy and horror movies. "If you're still reading this article, you're probably thinking "What the fuck?" about the title of this section." No, sir. I am thinking "What the fuck?" about you. Spıke¬ 01:53 5-Jan-10
Delete. Noel Coward, Lord of the Rings, Vampires..Serve as a craptail mix for undiscerning idiots. A stream of steaming nonsense. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:12, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Oh shit! Blaze Heatnix was written by user:Blaze Heatnix. It was his/her only article. It's not vanity because it technically refers to an obscure Megaman Character. Anyway, this article is written in some rare insano-engrish dialect that I can't even get close to interpreting into any intelligible concept. It's like a crystal geode of random wibble that, upon chemical testing, is found to consist of molecular nanowibble. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:40, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. It is vanity to create an article whose name is your user name. Regarding the dialect, the only kid I knew who felt so unbound by the rules of English was also packing heat. Spıke¬ 00:51 5-Jan-10
The way this reads, it could've just been typed up in a foreign language and translated into English with a translation website. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!) 01:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Only funny for bizarre lines like 'steak-meow' and 'weak against rocks'. English as She Is Spoke in reference to a famously bad Portuguese-English phrase book. (google it to see what I mean). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:34, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Zebra (Bastidge)
Keep
Delete
Delete. Seriously, what the fuck? OK, we have Zebra, this is a mess, it's random, pointless, and not linked from anywhere. Let's put it out of our misery. --UU - natter11:17, Jan 4
Delete. And don't redirect to Zebra. Even Zebra is random and pointless, but I've copied the "traditional attire" photo there to save it. Spıke¬ 13:55 4-Jan-10
Delete. "You can help Uncyclopedia by expanding" these two paragraphs of memes, says the template. Far easier to help Uncyclopedia in this way. Spıke¬ 13:46 4-Jan-10
Delete. Makes precisely no sense to me, hasn't been touched since the day it was created, and isn't linked from anywhere, so no-one gives a shit. Get rid. --UU - natter10:46, Jan 4
Delete. Something about Malaysian politics. Even so, this is complete garbage in any language. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:34, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I meant to quibble earlier that merely being about Lithuania didn't render an article in violation of UN:CM, and being about Malaysia doesn't either. It could be overcome by a really good article. This one prefers cheap shots and toilet humor. Spıke¬ 13:43 4-Jan-10
Is Template:Crap ever used except on crappy articles, to beg for their survival on the grounds that at least they know it's crap? Use the template to find all of them, then throw the template onto the fire. Spıke¬ 13:43 4-Jan-10
Die welle
Keep
Delete
Delete. Short 'n' shit. Should've been ICU'd or QVFD'd on creation, but wasn't - let's put that right. --UU - natter10:34, Jan 4
Delete. Yup, thanks for giving us your irreverent movie review. I browsed QVFD one day, and these articles are indeed what's there. Spıke¬ 13:38 4-Jan-10
Delete. Short. Dull. Not edited since creation in 2007. Not linked from anyone. In short, no-one gives a toss about it, so we may as well get rid. --UU - natter10:20, Jan 4
I have been working on things to add to the article plus Ive been doing other things around the site like attempting to spot out naughty people Toasty Da Mosty 06:45, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Conditional keep, as long as it gets fixed up. It might just be better to move it into your userspace for now. Also, you shouldn't remove the Vfd tag from articles as long as they're still up here. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!) 21:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Oh dear God, this is terrible. It's not finished, but huff it before the author gets the chance. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!) 03:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
And the author with it, by all means before he gets the chance to "spot out naughty people"! Spıke¬ 11:52 2-Jan-10
Delete. How do you know it's not finished? The author (Toasty Da Mosty, who alone worked on this between 10-Dec and 21-Dec) returned today but did something else. Spıke¬ 03:43 2-Jan-10
I just assumed it wasn't finished based on the last paragraph being an incomplete sentence with no period. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!) 03:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I'm actually upset this article survived to see 2010. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:44, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Comment.Toasty did you delete someone's VFD tag without permission? That makes you "naughty people".--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:15, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
A simple "revert" of Pelargonium. Toasty has put the orange construction cones back, and seen fit to add: "or also known as the war on bullshit as it was started by pure stupidity and a shit from a bull"--a turn of phrase that cries out for featuring. Let me know if you need help escorting him to the door. Spıke¬ 11:32 2-Jan-10 post-edited
Comment (Neutral): This article appears to have been created in response to an UN:REQ request. (Userfy?) --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 04:20, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
Giratinathegreat finished with this article about a year ago; edits since then are all basically vandalism, such as the Bert and Ernie gay-sex Easter Egg. I reverted it to that version, not claiming that changes its essence. Spıke¬ 00:51 4-Jan-10
Comment. If you happen to be illiterate just look at the picture. It gives a good idea of the badness in play here. Then you can... oh wait. Never mind. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:18, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
Panic Button
Keep
weak keep better than worthless image macro. --Mn-z 22:17, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
This is no macro but just a use of the LINK= syntax of double-bracket image syntax to make an image clickable. A macro (a template that let me specify the label on the Panic Button and the article to jump to) is a good idea. Spıke¬ 23:17 2-Jan-10
Delete
Delete. - This is something more fit for Illogicopedia, and I'm sure they already have one like this. If kept, I suggest expanding it and moving it to Game: space. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 18:39, Jan. 2, 2010
Hooray! Someone found a Poopsmith in the nick of time! No one gets banned! Spıke¬ 18:43 2-Jan-10
Comment. What is this exactly? Can it be recycled for the disambiguation pages as the fiery red certainly gets your attention??--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:30, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Interesting. When Dylanlip was going around replacing the yield-sign and stop-sign templates with his 3D-ish versions, someone said Wikipedia was getting ahead of us aesthetically. Although the "panic button" motif isn't applicable generally, what if our disambiguation pages were more graphic? Spıke¬ 19:57 2-Jan-10
In other words, it neither deletes the button graphic nor keeps someone from making it a click-through if we huff the Panic Button "article." Spıke¬ 14:20 3-Jan-10
Oooh, this is HenrytheNinja again! We last saw him inserting templates onto pages to indicate whether HenrytheNinja approved or disapproved of them. (You sent me down the hall to QVFD.) Spıke¬ 17:56 3-Jan-10
Delete. On the contrary, I think "Manchester YouTube" is a play on Manchester United. But the article is about Manchester City, and the first heading botches even that. A bigger problem is that it would be hard for even a well-written article to engage you regarding the foibles of the reserve players of even the Boston Red Sox: I presume making sport of a particular team's current roster fails UN:CM. Spıke¬ 17:42 3-Jan-10
Delete. Actually, here's the "joke": this was moved from the equally hilarious Madchester Oasis (Oasis members are Man City fans - side-splitting huh?) because the then-manager Sven Goran Eriksson bought a couple of players on the strength of seeing video footage of them. The endless subtleties of this "joke" will never get old, obviously. Anyway, as a result, we have two pages on Manchester City, both of which suck. Let's cut our losses, delete this, redirect it to the other POS and see what can be done with it. Or just delete the other one as well, whichever. --UU - natter18:06, Jan 3
Delete. Both articles are not much cop. Unfortunately these type of articles usually attract either fans to write about their team or others who hate them with a tribal passion. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:35, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. I predict a groundswell to huff this article about nothing, but it's small, unobtrusive, encyclopedic, and only briefly strays into overlong foreign names. The randomness furthers the theme of bizarrely quaint Eastern European culture. But hasn't seen substantial work since Nov-05. Spıke¬ 10:04 3-Jan-10
Keep.. Inoffensive though it does link off to articles that aren't to good. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:02, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. per above. --Mn-z 21:01, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
Keep.. I don't like witnessing deletions - Have mercy! Dannehvirus 05:50, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
Strong Keep I laughed twice, two more than on a VFD article usually, which isn't all that usual anyway. Kind of a nothing topic but the article is far above delete quality. --Nikau 22:38, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Made up bandcruft with moderate wibble content. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:03, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Seems pretty comprehensive - keepted. --UU - natter09:36, Jan 4
Delete. Perhaps an article with this title, like Manifest Destiny, will always be a magnet. An obvious destination for drive-by users seeking prurience, this dumping ground has no cleverness. Three templates at the start serve only to explain the joke, only there's no joke. Spıke¬ 09:57 3-Jan-10
Delete. Although the concept of: "it must be appreciated that swear words are linear: if we have two swear words, any linear combination of the two is also a swear word." was funny, the article was not. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*(talk)(stalk)Π ~ ~ 03 Jan 2010 ~ 10:44 (UTC)
Delete. A magnet for rants about American dominance. Serious essays would analyze what is "imperialism" and what isn't; humorous essays would, well, be funny. AnonIP reverts MrN9000 last spring, saying "more humor is this version"--by which he meant the wacky randomness he restored to the intro. Spıke¬ 09:52 3-Jan-10
Delete. - Randumb bollocks on what should be an intellegent article. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 11:42, Jan. 3, 2010
We must strike this down with the unrivaled power of VFD! Reasons are specified in Spike's comment and subsequent responses below. --TrekCaptain 01:04, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
This is about something--maybe a politican, maybe a journalist. It needs a copy-edit, much more material, and to make its theme clearer. But it's not total crap. Spıke¬ 18:38 2-Jan-10
Unfortunately, the subject fails UN:CM, so we can assume noone will be willing and able to fix it. --Mn-z 22:15, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - I like the idea. I thought about voting keep and slapping a rewrite template on it, but something this shitty needs to go. I added "Cremationism" to Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles instead. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 18:56, Jan. 2, 2010
Huff it, and the author too for screwing up a potentially good concept. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!) 21:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete. creationism meets Mr winkler is GAY style hatecruft. --Mn-z 22:12, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Brilliant vehicle to poke creationism, death rituals, and arbitrary other Christian tenets, ruined by inept execution and overt advocacy. (The solution to overt advocacy is not to slap on three templates labeling it, but to remove it and try something clever. I have half a mind to try, but this is root-canal work.) Spıke¬ 18:30 2-Jan-10
Hildegard von Bingen
Keep
Weak keep It has a concept, and I like how they used the Mesopotamian goddess Kishar in the article. Plus, I'm feeling kinda generous right now. —PaizuriMUN♦Talkpage♦My Contributions♦21:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Most of the Delete votes wish for improvements. How "generous" are you feeling? Spıke¬ 01:15 2-Jan-10
Delete. "Like so many women of her time, Hildegard was born." The concept is workable, the execution is inept throughout, from the above triteness, to the many places where the the author ruminates about his own phrasings, to ending with a gratuitous use of the c-word. Nonsense year number in the intro is my tip-off that the author's business is not humor but shoveling crap. Spıke¬ 20:15 1-Jan-10
Delete. As Spike says, the concept is very workable and with work this article could be made much better (like most things) but in the absence of improvements it needs to go. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:10, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.Checked it out and this sort of relates to the real Hildegard von Bingen but not by much. Can't see anyone taking an interest to improve it.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:20, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 01:00, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
What is Fail, Alex? --Kip > Talk•Works•• 11:25, Jan. 2, 2010
Delete. I would say 'delete this article' except I don't think it even qualifies as one. It's just a few paragraphs standing about in the same space like passengers in an airport terminal waiting for a flight out. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:20, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Valid concept--about a host of Jeopardy, and every quote should be in the form of a question--executed with stunning ineptitude by a series of users with punk handles who together can't figure out how to code the article's single section head. Article's best "joke"--klutzy Bush sulking about losing to Kerry and hitting the nuke button--was added by AnonIP five years after the election in question. Spıke¬ 11:47 2-Jan-10
Delete. - Awful bandcruft with no humor in sight. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 11:27, Jan. 2, 2010
Delete. Kip, you kidding? it has the best joke in the world: Protagonist is gay! Seriously, you're right, except for some odd remarks, it reads like a serious, if short and inept, band bio. Spıke¬ 11:38 2-Jan-10
Delete. Waterboarding is humane punishment after trying to make sense of this. It is almost surreal as it starts without an intro or explanation and goes straight into the 'article' . I tried the old google test - and came up with a website with men wearing crap coloured pants.So perhaps that is the joke!??--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:45, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Reverse vampire
Keep
Delete
Insider information says they will also attempt to invade the moon by the year -9740271.59268. HILARIOUS! —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!) 03:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This is vomit, from start to end. Spıke¬ 03:36 2-Jan-10
Delete. Wibble wibble wibble wibble! --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:41, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. - The title implies potential. Potential for crap, mostly. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 11:31, Jan. 2, 2010
Delete. The only interesting thing about this is the title. The rest of it is yet another product of the Randumbo Word Regurgitator with lines like this : They often campaign for equal rights for Rednecks, brown-nosers, and onions in the American and Scottish political and legal systems. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:08, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
WeirdAloman
Keep
Delete
Delete. Get it? Because his special powers are lines from Weird Al Yankovich songs. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:01, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
200,094. That's an absurdly high number in the intro, in violation of our style guide, and notable here because there could be that many additional articles about newly invented Pokémons. Relating to what? Al Yankovich, you say? Not closely enough to make this saveable; and that's too bad, because this looks like a capable humor writer. Spıke¬ 03:08 2-Jan-10
Delete.The Pope, Satan, Chuck Norris and Pokemon. You simply can't make a good article out of this, there are laws of chemistry that say so. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:46, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Sometimes the intro uses so many memes that it makes up my mind; here, the title has one too many. Bookboy1995 (can we conclude he's 14?) wrote this last August. It was verbal diarrhea. Thekillerfroggy slapped an ICU on it and The Lonely Nerd (!) stepped up and turned it into a conventional, if not compelling, article. He tried to save it and he deserves specific further editing instructions from us; only, he hasn't contributed since last 11-Sep. Spıke¬ 01:05 2-Jan-10
Delete. its almost as bad as one would expect with such a title. --Mn-z 01:08, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete 666 is the worst of all the Poke-your-mums. mAttlobster. (hello) 02:07, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Since the writer mentions John Milton, I'll call this Pokemon The Movie 666: Get Lost.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:01, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I promise you that if I ever line up toys and teddy bears in a Lego-block arena and have a death match with figure-four leg-locks, I will not subject y'all to the play-by-play. Spıke¬ 00:43 2-Jan-10
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 01:03, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Old and inactive, but still relevant to the modern trends to (1) nag us about getting thinner (and the irony of asserting that we are thinner), (2) apply sociological study to misbehavior such as kidnapping, resulting in (3) recommendations about what public-policy measures can be taken to let people misbehave more safely. Juxtaposing incompatibles (kidnapping + obesity) is a humor formula, adeptly executed. The acronym is tedious and should be hidden in a footnote, and the article shouldn't be signed. Spıke¬ 20:09 1-Jan-10
Keep. I'm pretty sure this was supposed to be an UnNews article. Although there are formatting errors, it should be easy to make this into a new entry if we may. —PaizuriMUN♦Talkpage♦My Contributions♦20:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE!!!! (with EXTREME prejudice) Per the reason its crap and that its a random Wall'O'Text that makes me sick. --TrekCaptain 20:09, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
It does seem to be written for UnNews--if that space allows articles this old--as it follows a news-reporting, rather than encyclopedic, format. Spıke¬ 20:27 1-Jan-10
Comments
Specific problems now addressed by edit in-place; in the case of Trek's Wall'O'Text, by adding links and 2 extra pix. Spıke¬ 21:12 1-Jan-10 post-edited
Comment Has anyone played Fat Princess? I haven't, but I hear it made a bunch of feminists mad, so it's okay in my book. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 18:47, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Kept~ 23:03, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Manaphy
Keep
Delete
Delete. Did somebody say POKEMON? No? Nobody? I thought I heard someone say pokemon or something that sounded like pokemon. Well, anyway I found a bad article about a pokemon, it's mostly a ramblin' tale about Jesus though and there's a list. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:30, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Not clever, just potty-mouthed. And there's a list. Spıke¬ 19:39 1-Jan-10
Yup, nuke it. per above. --TrekCaptain 20:01, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
NUKE IT! Reasons: (1)Per Pelargonium; (2)all red-linky and not good. --TrekCaptain 06:40, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. "dumber than a baby with Downs syndrome whose head had been whacked repeatedly with a 2x4" if I may quote. Written by QueenieZ in Feb-08, who did nothing else here, and only worked on since by AnonIPs. Spoiler: Protagonist is gay--Instant laughs, right? Spıke¬ 11:36 1-Jan-10
Delete...and that concludes the case for the prosecution...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:15, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Meh. I guess this would be slightly funny to those familiar with the video game(s), although I thought the use of, "topless dancer Anna "Pole Princess" Irving", to provide a proper linage for the "Lord" was good. I'd say unless we get a fanboy to fix it up lets git rid of it. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*(talk)(stalk)Π ~ ~ 02 Jan 2010 @ 01:42 (UTC)
World Domination Plan
Keep
Delete
Delete. I linked to this in one of my articles without having read it. Then I read it. —PaizuriMUN♦Talkpage♦My Contributions♦03:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep. per above. <edit> and replace per Spike's improvements. --Mn-z 05:23, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
Conditional Keep Spike's version replaces the version there now, and I'll be happy. --TrekCaptain 09:19, December 31, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. (formerly Delete) I messaged the keeps to ask them to flip to Delete, as mine is virtually a total replacement, but am happy to do it this way instead. Spıke¬ 12:37 31-Dec-09
Keep. Spike's rewrite increases the funny and removes the injoke and possible cyberbullying. IronLung 19:28, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. There is an Asian in many school classrooms, and he doesn't have time to pay attention to ME because he's working too hard on getting straight As. So the only explanation is, he must be angry at ME. Unlike an article on Pee Review recently about a fantasy character who's always angry so let's explore why, Angry Asian Kid is an archetype (ideally, based on the above grumbling, rather than a specific angry Asian named Yi Feng who is always beating up Anil) and deserves an excellent article. 06:07 PS--I wrote the preceding as a Keep, then returned to the article to see how to coax it in the said direction. Delete the listcruft, penis size, negative number of friends, everything specific to the one Asian kid? Surprise, there would be nothing left except maybe the first sentence. Better to start over.Spıke¬ 06:21 30-Dec-09
Delete.I think it is basically unfunny and may well be disguised cyberbullying. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:18, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
This article, in conjunction with the article listed above, appears to be an in-joke between friends about a person named Yi Feng Lee. Doesn't look like cyberbullying, but does look like unfunny crap nobody else cares about. IronLung 23:01, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
Kept~ 18:48, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Alternate version installed by edit. Spıke¬ 18:53 2-Jan-10
A week in Intensive Care. The concept of a rework of the James Bond films for Wales is worth pursuing, but the author must make it relate somehow to Wales, at least more so than to excretion. Points off for presuming knowledge of Welsh, and for the ineffective signal by Oscar Wilde that what follows is funny. It wasn't. Spıke¬ 15:42 24-Dec-09
Very Weak Keep there is just enough underlying potential to keep this one on the off chance that one of the authors learns that rape and listcruft isn't funny. I would recommend a fix tag. --Mn-z 01:40, December 25, 2009 (UTC)
Week Keep It has funny titles. Combine 'the cast' & 'box office receipts' into a table to cut about 1/3 of the article down. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*(talk)(stalk)Π ~ ~ 06:30, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
Weak Keep There is potential here, but it cannot exist in this form, keep, but shove a fix tag on it. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:03, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Emasculation, rape and lists. The first two I can forgive... --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
Delete.. Suggest a yakki dah with no expectation of a pension. Unfunny base camp humour as it is. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:57, December 26, 2009 (UTC)
Delete.. worthless listcruft. --TrekCaptain 02:53, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Kept~ 18:46, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Kuja
Keep
Yes. I didn't read it. I find the thought of someone actually sitting down and willingly reading this amusing. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 01:14, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
Delete.. It isn't an atrocious read though I have no idea what it is about. Seems a bit cruel to delete it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:57, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
Not atrocious. (formerly Comment) The article is about something (a video-game character); it has a consistent theme (cast the character as a gigolo); it uses real sentences and paragraphs rather than mere lists of one-liners; and I can't be sure a member of the target audience wouldn't laugh. Said members might need to get a life, but we're discussing the article, not them. Last two sections should die. Spıke¬ 13:15 21-Dec-09
Delete
Delete. Rally bad fanboy gamercruft. Kind of hurts to read. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:18, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I was gonna vote keep, but the last few sections changed my mind. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!) 21:56, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
Can't review. My eyes glaze over. Spıke¬ 19:27 18-Dec-09
Comment. This could make ham glaze over. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:18, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. That made me chuckle Monkey Crisco, I wish I'd said it. Sadly you're right, this article's hopeless which is a shame really as Kuja's an excellent character. Come on, you all know you'd do him given the chance. --Ozymandiaz 02:25, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. Jeez Romarts, could you make your vote a little more ambiguous? --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:57, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. Agree with Spike. Last two paragraphs can go . If the author(s) try to put them back, I'll go into the Delete Camp.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:15, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
Romartus confirmed on his talk page that he meant to write "last two sections." Spıke¬ 04:11 24-Dec-09
Space Bunnehz
Keep
Delete
Delete. A random offering from someone who spends too much time at Icanhazcheezburger. Sent me cross-eyed trying to read it. --UU - natter10:42, Dec 31
Delete. A marvelous photo--and a crap attempt to write an article around it. Spıke¬ 12:32 31-Dec-09
Delete.Idiots of the world unite..and go to another comedy site down the road.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:22, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Secret girlfriend
Keep
Delete
Delete. Random block o'text. Ends with the words "epic win". You got one word right. --UU - natter10:36, Dec 31
Delete. Article contains a hint that the author (with "lol" in his username) is 13 years old. Second sentence explains why you should read this middle-school composition: "the rift in time and space was forever closed for good." Spıke¬ 12:29 31-Dec-09
Yeah, I see what Spike's saying. --TrekCaptain 21:00, December 31, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Looks like a copy/paste from somewhere. Redlinky and unfuny. Also too old for ICU - Mnb, when you were busy removing that non-existent category from this, why did you not, for instance, ICU or QVFD it? This sucks. --UU - natter10:31, Dec 31
Delete. Deposited in mainspace by AnonIP a little over one week ago. Article on a local football club is workable, but this is nothing but lists and perhaps a little vanity. Spıke¬ 12:25 31-Dec-09
Delete. If it ain't vanity, it's crap. --UU - natter10:24, Dec 31
Delete. It is crap. An adaptation of Islam to the Beatmania "rhythm video game" released in 1997; oddly, with Ten Commandments. Wikipedia says the game is now a collector's item, so I don't see many players stepping forward to turn this into a real article. Spıke¬ 12:21 31-Dec-09
Delete.Risible Rislimism. Or just change every third word to crap and you would not alter the meaning of this article. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:03, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Red Eye headbutt
Keep
Delete
Delete. Makes no sense. About nothing. Not linked from anything. Precious few edits since creation in 2007. Get rid. --UU - natter10:19, Dec 31
Delete. As if to prove it's about nothing, the encyclopedia cliché appears in the second sentence of the intro. Spıke¬ 12:15 31-Dec-09
Delete. - Much ado about nothing. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 15:12, Dec. 31, 2009
Delete.. A hooter horror! Extreme rhinoplasty required. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:33, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
"Do we need to describe it anymore?" Yes, you do. In fact, an article that purports to ridicule the look of people's noses (and has nothing to do with retards) should have illustrations. The concept is okay, and the anger could be replaced with cleverness, but it's a tall order. I'll vote as desired if someone steps up. Spıke¬ 12:13 31-Dec-09
EXTERMINATE! so insanely crappy, it made me reach for alt+f4 before I realized I'm using Firefox (ctrl+f4 rules). Not worth keeping, so destroy it. --TrekCaptain 06:48, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.Luckily, the first paragraph helpfully signals it's going to be crap all the way. And it is/was...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:55, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
The Great Conflict
Keep
Delete
Delete. Wacky War Stories, now with 25% more wacky. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:01, December 31, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. No intro worth its salt, and the first paragraph makes it clear this will be an article about nothing. Average reader is not sold. I continued to the end, and found it in character. Spıke¬ 02:14 31-Dec-09
Flush! - Down to Illogicopedia it goes. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 06:48, Dec. 31, 2009
EXTERMINATE! --TrekCaptain 09:11, December 31, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. In a parallel universe this would be a featured article..wait.that place already exists! ?pedia !!...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:58, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Norweigan chicks
Keep
Delete
Delete. Disappointingly misleading, which doesn't make it deserve deletion in and of itself, but there's nothing coherent here. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 22:05, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. There's nothing coherent here. No reason either to mention the 2000 US election or to get all the details wrong. Spıke¬ 22:15 30-Dec-09
Delete verbosely titled and of very little use. It also has only 9 items. --Mn-z 06:59, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Dittoes to Mn-z. It is of no use. The 9 items in the category are unrelated, certainly not in the way suggested by the category. "I am clever" isn't the same as "This is funny." Similar to my nomination of the Bush-doesn't-care category (though there, although the items were unrelated, you could at least say that Kanye West had tried to relate them). Spıke¬ 15:36 24-Dec-09
NUKE IT! Send it into oblivion. --TrekCaptain 19:11, December 26, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I think Category:Things that may be out to get you might be keepable. There is some sort of theme there, and I dislike deleting categories if it will result in information loss. However, I would suggest merging Category:Things that are definitely out to get you into that category. They are about the same thing, and there is no reason a given topic should be in one as opposed to another. --Mn-z 01:51, December 25, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. I believe that the "out to get you" categories work as a trinity in-joke, complementing each other in their own little way. They're harmless and cute enough to get a pass. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:24, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
Maybe I should turn this idea into a real template set then. --Mn-z 23:10, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
Maybe we could just change it to: Category:Things that may be out to get some people, but not you. You're cool. (Now pass the controller. It's my turn.) ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*(talk)(stalk)Π ~ ~ 06:36, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
Somehow that would make it less funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:41, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. This is so odd...I want to keep it. I can see the spark of something in there.It may be a Randumbo-Get-Lucky moment..It can happen.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:45, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Oscar Wilde. Michael Jackson. Oprah. Shoop Da Woop. Do I need to go on? --UU - natter09:25, Dec 30
Delete. This article actually isn't cited in Uncyclopedia:In-jokes, so we won't be told it's really bad but it has to be saved for that reason. It may be that the "medium is the message," but media preoccupied with themselves are failures. Uncyclopedia should have no more than one "article" with which to mock itself. In addition, this is one of those articles trying to give all angles about what something isn't, and to add insult to injury, ends by nagging the reader. Spıke¬ 12:47 30-Dec-09
Delete. I liked this dumbwit line..to track the porn websites that you visit since Bill Gates couldn't get a girlfriend to save his life.....But has got a wife though. Check wiki author ! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:49, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Wanags
Keep
Delete
Delete. ICU escapist. I suppose I could just delete it for ICU abuse, but I've read it now, and misery loves company, so share my pain! --UU - natter09:14, Dec 30
Delete - Although I would celebrate this holiday. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 10:56, Dec. 30, 2009
Delete.Checked up on this. Wanags appears to be a surname,popular in the Baltic countries and Scandinavia. Pevidem is also a football club in Portugal.So what is this really all about? One for Dan Brown..perhaps.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:02, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Waybuloo
Keep
Delete
Delete. WTF? Oh right - something about a kids' TV show. No. --UU - natter09:12, Dec 30
Perverse category Hey, wouldn't it be funny if some random article had like 50 categories!!!1!!1one On a more serious note, if you want to find overcategorized stuff, try Special:MostCategories anything with more than 20 categories is probably over-catted, anything over 30 definitely is. --Mn-z 02:55, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
By all means! I bet most of the articles in more than 20 categories are also clearly crap.Spıke¬ 02:59 29-Dec-09
Keep Just because it's not very funny doesn't mean it's not funny. This has promise after editification. (If this was an in joke somehow (like if it had something to do with potatoes) we'd praise it.) ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*(talk)(stalk)Π ~ ~ 02:29, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. {{idea}} it if you think it needs work, but I think it's fitting for Uncyclopedia. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 20:25, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. better than worthless. --Mn-z 22:04, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I've deleted in place the entire section containing the "Game cruft" Romartus mentioned, the etymology, two sections that just speculated on negatives, and some quotecruft. Spıke¬ 02:19 29-Dec-09
Delete. Part of writing is learning when to stop writing. This subject couldn't support a stub. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:45, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. Suggest that it is re-edited. Middle section (Game cruft) is crap but intro and end are not too atrocious. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:28, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
Abstain pending edit, which would only need to involve judicious pruning.Spıke¬ 00:55 28-Dec-09
Keep. The humor is nerdy but the joke is obvious: Misinterpret the penis as a venom organ. It goes on for too long for the sake of credibility, but is complete, competent, and about something. Spıke¬ 00:28 24-Dec-09
Keep. I thought it was ok/good. Funny even. Suggestion halve the list and convert the rest into two to three supporting paragraphs. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byHappytimes (talk • contribs) (Fcuk! 02:37, 24 December 2009)
Good thinking, but the numbered list corresponds to the illustration (which came from Wikipedia). The list is so long because the illustration calls out many parts. Spıke¬ 04:09 24-Dec-09
Delete. What no tantric sex jokes ? I thought this was about the musician Sting. Just a paragraph , a drawing and a list. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:47, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
Delete it. Then delete 
Conditional keep, as long as it gets fixed up. It might just be better to move it into your userspace for now. Also, you shouldn't remove the Vfd tag from articles as long as they're still up here. —
Comment.Toasty did you delete someone's VFD tag without permission? That makes you "naughty people".--
Albanian Garlic Orchestra
Keep. Per my own internal thoughts on it. ~ 
Delete. Although the concept of: "it must be appreciated that swear words are linear: if we have two swear words, any linear combination of the two is also a swear word." was funny, the article was not. ~ 
EXTERMINATE!
Abstain. Can't decide on whether this should be nuked, or kept. --
I like it! Please move this to my user space (User:Happytimes/VFD/) so that I may fix it this decade. ~ 
Keep. It has quite a bit of promise.... ~ 
Weak, weak, abstain. A re-write could easily fix this, but why would anyone want to do that? ~ 
Meh. I guess this would be slightly funny to those familiar with the video game(s), although I thought the use of, "topless dancer Anna "Pole Princess" Irving", to provide a proper linage for the "Lord" was good. I'd say unless we get a fanboy to fix it up lets git rid of it. ~ 
Maybe we could just change it to: Category:Things that may be out to get some people, but not you. You're cool. (Now pass the controller. It's my turn.) ~ 
Categorically this should go. ~ 
Keep Just because it's not very funny doesn't mean it's not funny. This has promise after edit
