This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
SUPER NINTENDO, SEGA GENESIS! WHEN I WAS DEAD BROKE I COULDN'T PICTURE THIS! And I'm glad I couldn't. FUCKYEAHIAMSOPUNKROCK! 23:37, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Trade to ED for future draft picks. Spıke¬ 23:39 11-Dec-09
Delete. I think it's supposed to be a parody-by-analogy of how shitty Epic Movie was... but somehow or other it just doesn't work. pillow talk 23:42, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
Good grief. /charlie brown •••Necropaxx(T){~}Saturday, 11:06, Dec 12 2009
Epic Fail - Somebody had to say it. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 18:45, Dec. 12, 2009
Comments
Persistence
Keep
Delete
Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. Repetition stopped being funny by 2006. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 12:43, Dec. 11, 2009
Delete. I guarantee this unfunny in any language , time period, epoch etc etc.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:23, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Kennewick War
Keep
Delete
Delete. One of those "wacky war" articles, you know the ones. If I listed everything wrong with this article I'd actually be writing another bad article. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:26, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Global Armageddon comes to my home town. Spıke¬ 12:57 11-Dec-09
Delete. A waste of my time reading the damn thing, but little else. --UU - natter13:22, Dec 11
Delete. Our possible literary future. Read all you can now before dumbos like this take over. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:32, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Could be covered by the emerging consensus, below, to keep Pasketmaul but huff the many articles that serve only to flesh it out. Spıke¬ 12:52 11-Dec-09
"Sigh" - "Kif, er, I mean Kip, spare me the weary sigh." --Kip > Talk•Works•• 13:24, Dec. 11, 2009
Comments
Chocolate Cake Church
Keep
Delete
Delete. A stub with paragraphs so brief there's no room for jokes.--Count of Monkey Crisco 10:00, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. When does something simple become "irritatingly simple"? When you are straining to add humor to a topic that's irritatingly humorless. Spıke¬ 12:51 11-Dec-09
Delete. No substance to it. And it starts with a painfully obvious Russian Reversal, even by the standards of Russian Reversals. --UU - natter13:01, Dec 11
Delete - The religion is a lie. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 13:18, Dec. 11, 2009
Comments
Pasketmaul/Teams
Keep
Delete
Delete. Of course if you have a made up sport you can't forget the made up teams. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:00, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Now this is just list. The stadium is located at "your face". We're truly dealing with a comedic genius. *facepalm* --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:00, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Pointless listcruft. The only purpose is to flesh out the main article. Spıke¬ 11:36 8-Dec-09
Delete. per above. --TrekCaptain 21:46, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
Delete.--TrekCaptain 21:48, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Short 'n' shit. --UU - natter12:47, Dec 11
Comments
The KTs
Keep
Delete
Delete.Bandcruft stub. It claims to be an in joke but if it is it's way more "in" than I'll ever get. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:37, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Band and its hits parallel the Beatles but don't relate to anything. The claim to be an in-joke is via category, surely an appeal to us to spare its wretched life. The link on line 1 is not to yet another bad band article but to, groan, yet another crufty video-game article. Spıke¬ 20:56 9-Dec-09
Delete. Though it has been written reasonably well , this article isn't funny unless there is some explanation why they are called the KT Band. Vanity work ?--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:31, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. There are better spoof band articles. Does look a bit Vanity-based. My Tree! 14:40, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Pasketmaul/Lite
Keep
Delete
Delete. ANOTHER ONE? There's like nothing here man! This is SHIT!--Count of Monkey Crisco 08:00, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 16:18, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --TrekCaptain 21:48, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Pasketmaul/Cult of the Month
Keep
Delete
No Fucking Way?!?!? BLOOD BLOOD BLOOD! I'll fucking kill every last one of you motherfuckers and your fucking mothers. Die you shitcocks!!! Fuckin'DIE --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:00, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Marketing Partnerships, in which a sports team or league tries to transfer fans' love to a commercial product that they would otherwise hate, is an institution that deserves our satire. This article doesn't begin; it is a stub of listcruft. Most of the material is in the awful initial template. Spıke¬ 11:30 8-Dec-09
Keep. I fixed-ish it up. There was a lot of good stuff in there. It was buried under a little bit of crap, but it was easy enough to fix. This is not too bad if you know who Owens is. WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 22:30, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Much improved, thanks. Spıke¬ 23:12 7-Dec-09
Keep. per fixing. --Mn-z 15:48, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Bad list and just not very funny. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:54, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Terrell Owens is eminently ridiculous, in ways that this article mentions, through its strutting and trash-talking. He brings immense raw talent to a team and destroys its teamwork ethic. Rush Limbaugh famously lost a sports-commentator job charging that Owens was artificially touted by networks eager to promote a black quarterback (though Owens is not the first one). There is an article in here, waiting to get out, but it can only be done justice by a fan living 250 miles southwest of here. Spıke¬ 01:18 7-Dec-09
My bad, it is McNabb that Limbaugh dissed. But ain't my fault.Spıke¬ 23:12 7-Dec-09
Quickly. A small collection of random thoughts with no theme. It is notable when you view the cinematic Eye of Sauron and perceive a vagina. Unite against Coding Under the Influence! Spıke¬ 23:32 9-Dec-09
Delete Stupid stub that does nothing but randomly rehash a bunch of our in-jokes without adding anything new to them. Absolutely nothing funny about the whole thing. Wild at Heart 06:35, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Reads like an Encyclopedia Dramatica article. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:32, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Plus vanity/cyberbullying on "Chris." Spıke¬ 12:08 9-Dec-09
Delete. So apparently Hitler started a rock band (again)... or a biker gang. I don't know. It's a moronic article, that's the important bit. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:05, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Good concept, poor exectution. I don't think it even mentions any Saudis in the article. Found it. Still not funny, though. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!)
Delete. Randumbo mix and mismatch. If you are going to start on a joke about the Saudis - at least the writer could have woven that idea more into this piece. He doesn't and therefore it is a just pile of reused dog ends. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:53, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 15:49, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
No significant development since 2006. Nothing relevant on author's user or talk pages. Can't tell if this article relates to anything, least of all Hitler; if it does, it could be saved, first by cutting the three reincarnations and the impossible chronology. Spıke¬ 23:34 7-Dec-09
Pink Panther Party
Keep
Delete
Delete. This is bad in lots of ways. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:30, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. There is a concept: Cross the separatist Black Panther Party with effeminacy (essentially its opposite). It's unrealized. If whites wrote this, it's racial name-calling; if blacks, then it's street trash talk. Either way, it's a waste of bytes. Coincidentally, it drops the name of Terrell Owens. Spıke¬ 01:22 7-Dec-09
Delete. It could have possibly worked but the writer falls into a big crap hole of tired racism to make it really funny. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:41, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 15:47, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
There is also a Pink panther, it redirects to "User:MrCleveland/Pink Panther", and it's mostly crap. The exaggerated list of real and fancied sequels makes a point, but the contents don't relate to anything. I can't VFD something in userspace, but I would VFD the pointer. Spıke¬ 11:16 7-Dec-09
If this is deleted, I will slide in the smallish User:SPIKE/Pink Panther Party as a replacement. If you see additional directions for this one to go in, I welcome them. Spıke¬ 01:30 8-Dec-09
Replacement article is installed. Spıke¬ 12:37 9-Dec-09
Keep. One of our more presentable band-based articles, though it needs editing, as when it tries too hard to be witty "(as opposed to not being witty which is of course the only thing worse than in fact being witty)".... Spıke¬ 11:03 6-Dec-09
Keep. It expertly does what it sets out to do. Sir Winston Pooh? The lady's ass "shaken, not stirred"? Fabulous! The section "Early life," however, does seem to exist just for completeness and needs to get funnier. Spıke¬ 03:58 29-Nov-09
Keep. It shows some flashes of humour but needs expansion. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:13, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
Keep.. I wouldn't vote for on VFH, but found it amusing if short. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 06:32, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Uncyclopeda is the top search on a very small number on google, so it's probably a totally fake person. The article is also flimsy and too short (though the committee to give Alan Moore and Bath and A Shave was sort of cute).--Count of Monkey Crisco 03:50, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
Dear Lord. This is hilarious. I mean, the video is. This article is completely plagiarized. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 17:59, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Just No. A mess of words. My Tree! 18:42, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Regretful Delete“I loved wife like sun raise... DARK MAN YOU WILL SUFFAR!” John Freeman ponted and yelled. Okay, I laughed quite a bit, but for the wrong reasons. This fails about as hard as anything written in English could and that is funny, but I cannot endorse this sort of thing in good conscience. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:29, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Concept stolen, execution illiterate. But amazing it hasn't attracted support from the so-bad-it's-good gang. Spıke¬ 23:28 7-Dec-09
Some of you are missing the point that this is completely plagiarized. Search for John Freeman on Youtube. It's better in video form, trust me. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 23:23, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I don't so much care that Zim wrote it, but yes, I think the article is supposed to be all AAAAAAAAAs. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 18:03, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! Um... is this news article supposed to be all "A's"? I don't think so, even though the title references screaming. Moved from QVFD due to age.--TrekCaptain 17:19, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Delete.There can only be one. -Conner McCloud --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:21, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. The concept is valid--though unoriginal--but the execution is (necessarily) simian. Count is right; we need (at most) only one of these. Spıke¬ 19:02 7-Dec-09
Comments
Invalid Nom too young for a vfd nomination. --Mn-z 20:01, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Strongest Keep Possible You seriously want this deleted? No. I'm not even going to try to say something funny here. Just keep this and move on. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 18:02, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. Also also, you might want to read the rules at the top. Nominations without the {{VFD}} tag are invalid. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 18:08, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
That a series of blank sections is acceptable if it makes a point refutes the assertion that there is {expansion} required for the small but complete Barack Obama's birth. Spıke¬ 19:09 7-Dec-09
I don't see the comparison. Is Barack Obama's birth intentionally short as a commentary on a possible cover-up regarding his true origins? Doesn't look like it. It just looks stubby, like it's better suited to be a section than an article. And there are no blank sections in The Emperor's New Clothes -- if anything, the sections are too long. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 20:02, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Invalid. No VFD tag. Voting closed. ~ 21:28, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Keep (1) Bush still was a president at some point. World War two was what, 60+ years ago, and nobody questions it when someone makes fun of that. (2) The fact that the statement is more trivial adds to the comedy of it for me. As well, it's one of the least cliche forms of Bush humor. I'd think that would warrant it having more value than just the idea that he was a bad president (3) Your mom (4) Sort of partially agreed, but there are 205 articles in this category...plus, it's not a list, it's a category. It gets put onto other pages individually, it's not like it's an actual content page that was made for just listing a bunch of shit. If anything, this is ten times superior to that sort of idea. -RAHB 12:28, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Regarding (1), compare "Category: Places the Nazis didn't bomb in WW2"--even more trivial, like a zillion other things, and less preferable than writing something that's actually funny. Spıke¬ 12:40 7-Dec-09
Keep. I think you're really fishing for something to delete here, when there are larger pieces of crap to fry. ~ 12:32, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Mmmmm.... fried peices of crap. *drools* --Kip > Talk•Works•• 15:55, Dec. 7, 2009 15:55, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Keep.Actually it's related to the rapper/celebrity-trainwreck Kanye West's quote, Spike. Your argument reveals that you don't "get" what it's about so it's not credible. I say lweave the category alone. --Count of Monkey Crisco 13:32, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. This category is sorta random, but its also large, and there is some link between the articles in this category. So, deleting this category, would probably result in some "information loss". --Mn-z 16:47, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Delete (1) Bush is no longer President. (2) The statement that "I care about everything" was one of the more forgettable acts of his forgettable Presidency. (3) Every President claims to care about everything (cf. Clinton and "Ah feel yo' pain"). (4) Lists of negatives are stupid lists, and tagging something with this Category to ridicule Bush is instant humor with zero creativity. Spıke¬ 12:20 7-Dec-09
Comments
Kept. ~ 21:26, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Lance Vance
Keep
Delete
Delete. We've hit the threshold here people: second generation GTAcruft. Not just cruft about a fictional GTA game, an article about a minor character in GTA game. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:02, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It's like trying to stamp on fleas . --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:43, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. True second-generation cruft would be an article about an article about a GTA game. But I'll help you snuff out this one. Can you kill some mexicans for me?Spıke¬ 11:06 7-Dec-09
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 17:08, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. But that's not a joke but a meme (a value-exceeding-the-maximum). This description of a Japanese video game about "a soccer nerd kid who dumbed his girlfriend" is supposed to be funny because nothing is exactly right. Except, you wouldn't know. Spıke¬ 15:52 6-Dec-09
Delete. This game is considered by many fans to be one of the worst in the series. See where I'm going with this? —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!)
Delete. The review, in fact, claims that it's identical to its predecessors--about the most brainless way there is of ridiculing something. Perhaps throw out ways it might have been different, and experiment with different ways of saying, "Nope." Nope. However, "you get to hurt your self when you crash into things inside your car." Spıke¬ 15:42 6-Dec-09
Delete. Another shocking example GTA cruft. It is just a shame none of the writers of these junk pieces don't try and come up with an original angle to the original GTA. If this is one , I haven't seen it so far. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:37, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Sex. Gays. AIDS. Masturbation. Rape. That's a total of one joke. Spıke¬ 18:43 5-Dec-09
Is there really an anime entitled "Gravitation" or are the writers of the article just mentally challenged? --RomanDogBird!!!!!:D :D :D :D :D :D :D 21:48, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Crap keep but a keep all the same. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:35, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Double Keep. Because the nom should've been closed ages ago. I mean, there were like 12 days between the November votes and the December ones. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM14:04, 7 December 2009
Delete
Delete. An irredeemable shitfest of poop. pillow talk 19:54, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per Hyperbole. --Mn-z 23:24, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. No notable basis, inscrutable. PS--I'm biased toward Delete when any article breaks the encyclopedia canon with impossible year numbers just to display its zaniness. Spıke¬ 20:50 23-Nov-09
soft delete Some workable random humor, but not enough to make it save worthy. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:23, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
Delete.. It's got Oscar Wilde, Your Mother, Gay jokes, and random dates! Ha Ha! Funny! WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 06:30, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Am waiting for someone to tell us if there is a musical group by this name; that is, that this article has any basis, and that its inscrutability is an encoded reference to real facts. Spıke¬ 22:48 19-Nov-09
So would you vote keep for real bandcruft and delete for fake bandcruft? Or the other way around? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 23:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Mostly want to defer voting while I don't know what I don't know, which was a lot in the case of Suryavarman II. Yes, it would be more keep-able if it were clearly bandcruft. Spıke¬ 23:26 19-Nov-09
A quick wikipedia and google search seems to say no, or at least they fail UN:CM. --Mn-z 23:49, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. I would like to see an article on Marital Arts that combines marriage and fighting. Actually, that's kind of depressing. I'm off to sulk now. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 23:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Been here long enough with no clear consensus. Voting closed. ~ 21:32, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
Fuckedupagon
Keep
Delete
Delete. Zombieninjapiraterobotmonkeycruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:04, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Describes a packed [sic] between the ruling powers of the world. Illiterate and unfunny. Spıke¬ 11:06 6-Dec-09
Delete. Looks to me like an abandoned WIP with a fake expiration date on the template. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!)
Delete. Yes; author tagged himself with WIP, which he coded to be checked in 2012, then abandoned the page for November. This alone merits huffing. Spıke¬ 22:55 5-Dec-09
comment. Actually, I found the altered template to be pretty darm funny. Except it's cheating, I suppose. But still, I think it could be used somewhere. Excuse me while I steal it. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 06:40, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Well, those templates are used on all the Final Fantasy articles, but if you really wanna keep it... —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!)
I just checked I - III and V - VIII, and didn't see it on any of them. Perhaps we're talking about something different? I'm talking about what Spike mentioned above. That I found funny (even if troublemaking), and added to my talk page. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 07:22, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE!Only contains the word "f***" and variations of specified word, and is basically 4 lines long. No worth whatsoever to Uncyclopedia, just random swearing for no point. Further, its marked as a dead end article. --TrekCaptain 22:02, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Delete.This is when you use QVFD. Unfortunately, Socky has seen it, and has elected instead to boldface the first paragraph, so he'll be voting Keep.... Spıke¬ 22:05 4-Dec-09
I DID put in under QVFD (yesterday). Nothing happened to it. (I BLAME THE ADMINS!!!) Ya think I should post it there again?--TrekCaptain 22:07, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Not now that it's in VFD, that's sort of short-circuiting the voting process. Spıke¬ 22:09 4-Dec-09
Perhaps bothering an admin about it might make them start monitoring the page more... --TrekCaptain 22:20, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
In the future, if an article repeatedly put on QVFD is not deleted, it means that it's not going to be deleted. So if this is kept, I expect to at least see a month period before it's relisted again. Continuously drawing attention to something isn't going to change what happens to it. -RAHB 05:03, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
People kept QVFDing it. I kept removing it. --AndorinKato 06:41, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. and redirect per Syndrome. That other one is a better sentence and has commentary. The one is this article is too verbose. --Mn-z 06:28, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. This article was in no way funny to me, looked horrible, and made me have a miscarriage. --SirStarnestommy(Talk • Contribs • CUN) 06:44, Dec. 5, 2009
No sir, I don't like it. --Mr. Horse 22:41, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It isn't inventive enough for keeping. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:34, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Recommendation: Lock and delete, should it be removed. --TrekCaptain 22:09, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Suggestion - Perhaps it could be moved to UnPoetia? --Kip > Talk•Works•• 04:44, Dec. 5, 2009
TrekCaptain, it seems that you have unfortunately stumbled onto an inside joke, one of the articles that's "so bad it's good," an archetype of how not to write an article for a web site on how not to write encyclopedia articles. Let us hope that the Admins will tell us the difference, once and for all, between an article that's "so bad it's good" and an article that is simply bad. This one is simply bad. Ridicule me as an ex-Wikipedian, but some stuff needs to be written down. Spıke¬ 12:44 5-Dec-09
Delete. Written like an ED article with no humor unless you hate him as much as the writer.—PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!)
Delete. "Not all cultures are the same, and they are not equally good at everything," and this author's culture cannot even poke fun at a rapper with creativity. Andorin, the Rabbi, and the Chief Justice have spent a lot of time reverting anonIP edits to this article, though the article would make it hard to call anything vandalism of it. Spıke¬ 18:50 5-Dec-09
Delete Long, listy and unfunny. If a bunch of people continuously edit a page for years and it never gets any better, I'd think it's time to call it quits and start over. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:00, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I would suggest moving the current page to User talk:Spang/archive12 and starting over with a blank slate. The current page is way too long to prune down to a manageable size. --Mn-z 06:14, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
fuk dis nigga --Roman Dog Bird 22:40, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I'm hoping this is a joke. --AndorinKato 06:43, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
We don't joke about serious stuff like this. Spang needs to be taught a lesson. We don't sit back and watch the deletion of BUTT POOP without giving the deleter his comeuppance. This is only the beginning. WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 09:59, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
No. No, your question isn't VFD abuse. You're allowed to ask questions. What do you think this is, China? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 03:27, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Keep'd. While the contributions of others on that page suck, mine there are, frankly, awesome. And also invalid nom, but that's probably tangental. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:27, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Adolf Shitler
Keep
Keep Funny but needs some more work. Yada Parada 21:57, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Article says, "Shitler died, even though he was immortal"--then envisages his reanimation. That is, the only coherent thing about this page is the potty humor (sometimes literally). Rewritten or not, why would we want such an article? Spıke¬ 00:36 29-Nov-09
Delete. I liked the headlining picture. That's it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:25, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
Delete The article lacks coherence and is too meme dependent. --Mn-z 17:03, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Maybe it can be taken as an illustration of how Hitler needed the Jews eliminated because some things inherent to the Jewish heritage, like the sanctity of life, conflicted with his ideals. To achieve the society envisioned by Hitler, opponents and supposed inferior humans would need to permanently eliminated, and a concept like the sanctity of life would be in clear contrast to such practices. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM01:13, 29 November 2009
Call me uneducated, but how are you seeing all that in a peice of shit with a mustache? --Kip > Talk•Works•• 01:38, Nov. 29, 2009
Oh, I see. That is pretty clever, though probably unintentionally. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 01:48, Nov. 29, 2009
Likewise. I'm more interested in the conflict between this dumb article and the Uncyclopedia heritage, like the sanctity of humor. Spıke¬ 01:40 29-Nov-09
So you'd vote "keep" on any article that included two pictures of an attractive woman in a bikini? pillow talk 20:25, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Well, that depends. Here, I think the article is consistent for the most part and has a fair enough concept (perfect woman/Kim Bauer). Some bits are utterly crappy, of course, but that shouldn't doom the whole article. Though I admit that without these images, I would have totally voted to exterminate this. I guess it's funny in a way how hot chicks get crap articles. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM02:09, 23 November 2009
You should know that Mnbvcxz has updated his undeleteable page, BUTT POOP, just for you. pillow talk 03:46, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
Keep, per Socky Yada Parada 19:01, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. If I told you that I enjoy masturbating, would you laugh? If the answer is "no," then there's no humor in this article. pillow talk 01:47, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Another article from the Randumbo template. If the writer had at least stuck to 24 then I may have abstained...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:33, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete No idea who she is and whilst she's quite fit in that empty 'I like kittens' way - well - this isn't funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:20, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Article sucks, images are available elsewhere. --UU - natter12:02, Dec 4
EXTERMINATE! Not worth the memory space on the uncyclopedia servers, and the images you can easily find by using the most evil tool in the world for n00bs, called GOOGLE. --TrekCaptain 00:04, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Would this be a good candidate for a Alessandra Ambrosio type macro? --Mn-z 03:05, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Honestly, in general, I'm not in favor of replacing shitty articles with image macros. In my opinion, that tends to discourage articles on those subjects from ever being written. Maybe no one will ever have a funny idea for an Alessandra Ambrosio article, but if they did, they'd probably land on that page and say "Oh. Well, I might offend someone if I campaigned to get that replaced, so I'll leave it alone." A wizard did it is a good place for an image macro because it isn't taking up any article namespace real estate, but Elisha Cuthbert is a page where, in a perfect world, we should have a fully realized article. pillow talk 01:20, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
We could always place a rewrite tag on the macro. Or, better yet a "we couldn't think of anything funny to write about this subject, so we made an image macro template, if you can think of a better idea, please rewrite this"- template. --Mn-z 18:35, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
UnNews:Remington Steelers return home to England to perform at teen actor's funeral
Keep
Delete
Delete. I know we usually don't see UnNews articles here but A) Why not, some are really crap and B) I'm afraid that Remington Steelers might be related to a tapeworm, capable of regrowing from even a single left over body segment. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:23, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Yes! either pursues the vanity of their personal band or the vanity of their personal fantasy band. Either way, they have already been shown the door. Spıke¬ 15:49 4-Dec-09
Delete. per sagacruft control. --Mn-z 17:46, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Someone with real power, please correct "nessessary" in Template:VFDRules2. Spıke¬ 15:49 4-Dec-09
Keep. The author is active on the site and keeps coming back to this one to work on it. He last worked on it just a few weeks ago, and even left a note at the bottom asking us to improve rather than delete it. I don't know. Deleting it seems kind of cruel. pillow talk 17:32, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
I think this has potential. I remember this episode of the Cosby Show where Cosby started acting all weird about Pokemon, or Pokey Mans as he called them. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM17:42, 3 December 2009
Keep - POKEMON! Pokemon, with the pokey and the man and the thing where the guy comes out of the thing and they like to go RAH RAH RAH RAH! --Kip > Talk•Works•• 21:02, Dec. 3, 2009
EXTERMINATE! Pointless crap (no offense, but that's my description of it). Not funny, not worth being here on uncyclopedia. --TrekCaptain 01:13, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
delete Just to negate the 'sympathy keep'. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:45, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
maybe we could convince the user to move to illogicopedia, and take his articles with him? --Mn-z 17:36, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Comment.Or send him toward that insane Remington Steelers Wiki to keep Ryansaurus company. The fact that Jupiterfox is active on the site is something that leads to the average quality of uncyclopedia articles getting worse, not better. BTW, Socky The Cosby show ran from '84 to '92. The first Pokemon game was released in '96. You might be thinking of an episode of the Simpsons where the animated Bill Cosby went on about Pokemon in a fictional reboot of Kids say the Darnedest Things. Yes, the article is, at best, a retelling of a Simpsons bit that wasn't that great to begin with. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:52, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. Syndrome: That would be Minerva Mink from the 90's cartoon series Animaniacs. Jupiterfox's passions seem to run toward the "exotic". He makes a lot of random stuff about cartoon characters (much of which is currently deleted) or adds content to the same. I was thinking of improving the article by striking through the second paragraph and going off on a tangential article-within-article called "How to Be Funny and Not Just Furry" but that would be edging dangerously close to the "personal attack" territory. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:06, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Just be glad he prefers Minerva Mink other that other female Animaniacs character. --Mn-z 05:43, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Well, if you're talking about the toon I think you are, he does claim to be friends with her and Lola Bunny on his user page. Plus we have to worry about the possibility of him building a page around this.--Count of Monkey Crisco 06:17, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. It's weird but it works in an in-jokey way. Shine on you crazy diamond. The trivia section is "very optional" but it's not wholly unfunny. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:29, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. per above. --Mn-z 17:25, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Delete Good idea, terrible execution. Trivia section, no categories, too few relevant links, too little humor, and who the hell is "Rendell Monroe"? It's "Randall Monroe," dumbass. Wild at Heart 01:46, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. "This pseudo-intellectual clap should serve to eat up the last 30 minutes of my work day." I'm grateful that Section 4, though still in self-obsession, summed up exactly why it should be hanged without possibility of parole. Section 2 is so needlessly cryptic that I never got the "good idea." It's babble. Spıke¬ 02:06 3-Dec-09
Delete. Memetrash. Even overuses strikethrough. Personal mention of RAHB in final section suggests the author will not be surprised to lose another bad article. Probably won't take him more than ten minutes to bang out a replacement. Spıke¬ 13:50 29-Nov-09
Delete.Strongly Agree with Spike's reasons, as well as my comments under the "comments" box below. --TrekCaptain 01:03, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
A thought, if I may. The article itself (after I re-read it) is not funny in the slightest. It also contains racist themes within it, such as the phrase (NOTE: I am just quoting the page) "I'm in Auschwitz killin your jews," which several others might consider offensive. These are only two reasons, however the racist theme(s) alone should allow for it to be removed. --TrekCaptain 15:53, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
Concur; but the fact that someone can claim to be offended cannot argue against free speech, or much of the content here becomes problematic. What bugs me, as always, is gratuitously mentioning a slaughter of humans with no connection to comedy. By the way, just as offensive is a guide to warfare by a kid who obviously never got closer than a Playstation console. Spıke¬ 17:55 1-Dec-09
I apologise. that was me. It was meant as a sort of deliberately-be-beyond-the-pale-offensive joke in a doomed article, since I didn't find the rest of it funny and thought I'd just vent at it. Again, I apologise. Terribly sorry to offend. Though as Frankie Boyle puts it "I've been studying Isreali Army Martial Arts. Now I know ten ways to kick a Palestinian woman in the back". You know, _that_ sort of offensive and yet funny. Epic fail on my part. Oh, poo. Myocardialinfarction 18:15, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
With the immediate comments in response to my thought, I have to agree with both SPIKE and Myocardialinfarction. This article is written in a non-humorous way, and has too many offensive items (NOTE: when I use the word offensive, I mean offensive in a way that would incite public outcry if released to the world). If only I knew how to submit a vote for quick deletion... maybe. --TrekCaptain 18:59, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. (formerly Comment) New version at User:SPIKE/Port is keepable, though it still has too much from the original and still lacks illustrations. Hyperbole, or any wine lover, can you contribute new ideas?Spıke¬ 01:15 29-Nov-09
My version is done. No other ideas were forthcoming, and my illustration (a glass of red wine) is generic. But this essay on Port Huron port beats the former randomness on the Marquis de Sade and Elton John. Spıke¬ 13:55 4-Dec-09
Keep. and move copy-paste the updates into the article. --Mn-z 16:58, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
This is in no worse shape than we found The Wish Fish. Does have some fun with the nautical term. If a true wine-lover should try to clean this article up, I'll help it along. Spıke¬ 16:03 27-Nov-09
Alternate version is installed. Spıke¬ 12:50 5-Dec-09
Steve trump
Keep
Delete
Delete. Because, why? Whoremonal 22:48, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
You realize that such a rationale will induce about three guys here to vote Keep. Because, why not? Spıke¬ 23:01 4-Dec-09
Delete. Donald Trump's brother doesn't rise to the level of an article. Maybe if it were funny. Author tells us (at the end) exactly why Wikipedia booted his ass out, also why he wouldn't lower himself to doing business with Encyclopedia Dramatica; also informs us he has a private copy of this (for re-injection?) if we should delete it. Spıke¬ 22:59 4-Dec-09
Delete., and ban the IP just in case he actually did copy and paste it somewhere ready for us to delete it. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!)
Paste the template BELOW the arrow, and not to the right of it, and the section becomes individually editable. Spıke¬ 22:59 4-Dec-09
Sorry, noted. Whoremonal 23:21, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
clonecest
Keep
Delete
Delete. ICU'ed years ago, then poked by IP numbers infrequently. There's really not much worth saving. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:26, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Concept: promising, provided that there were some point to merging clowns to a Simon & Garfunkel album. Execution: unbegun. Article entered Intensive Care in Nov'06, good for one paragraph and an Infobox; nothing but reorg and deletions since. Finish the job. Spıke¬ 11:53 4-Dec-09
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 17:41, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. Half-arsed, yes, but might be funny to an Australian. Where's PuppyOnTheRadio when you need him? Spıke¬ 21:41 4-Dec-09
Parliament
Keep
Delete
Delete. Parliaments are important governing bodies in dozens of democracies and pseudodemocracies around the world. They vary in power and flavor from British to Russian to Funkadellic to inexpensive cigarettes. The one common factor in all parliaments is that they have nothing to do with fucking gorillas!--Count of Monkey Crisco 02:24, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. - To Illogicopedia it goes! --Kip > Talk•Works•• 02:28, Dec. 4, 2009
Delete. A surprising number of hands (none recently) have worked to create this unfunny mess. Spıke¬ 03:02 4-Dec-09
Delete Poorly written, grammar and formatting errors, totally devoid of any semblance of humor. Wild at Heart 01:43, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Corporation in rampant conquest of world domination. Most bad ass, bad ass, of bad asses. Another character for someone's personal video game. Spıke¬ 02:13 3-Dec-09
Article was put in intensive care Jan'07. Author removed the tag and replaced it with: "EDIT: Still under construction. Buddy." This legend, though simplified, is still there, though article last underwent a flurry of edits about this time last year. Spıke¬ 02:13 3-Dec-09
HCI
Keep
Delete
Delete Nothing funny at all, even to its narrow target demographic. I don't see the humor in it, and it has a one star rating. Wild at Heart 01:40, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. As above. HCI might be Human-Computer Interface. Glad author is having trouble with the course. Spıke¬ 02:18 3-Dec-09
Delete. Pointlessly breaks the encyclopedia canon to tout this nonexistent donut stand. And an effective tout wouldn't mention bowel movements. Spıke¬ 13:12 2-Dec-09
Delete. Utter crap. Wild at Heart 16:24, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 17:18, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
HKN in fact has nothing to do with Hong Kong; it is the Eta Kappa Nu fraterity of U of M, the likely source of this coded self-promotion. Spıke¬ 13:12 2-Dec-09
Vape it. Page sucks and we have this. Which isn't all that good either, but at least it has a couple of nice, relevant GIFs that have been there longer than I have. But seriously, let's delete this. --AndorinKato 02:22, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Baleet. Democracy! -RAHB 02:24, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
4chan has another version where it does happen. Spıke¬ 13:58 2-Dec-09
Comments
Both suck. Authors stray from humor into instruction. The result should merge the best (?) of both and be about half as long; don't list synonyms, just use them. Spıke¬ 02:50 2-Dec-09
Comment. As above. If there is a How:To Masturbate then elements from these should be redirected there .--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:32, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Three of them? Unlike Forum:Climate-change articles, there are not three unique Uncyclopedia approaches to masturbation and thus no real use for multiple articles. I like how the HowTo: avoids the graphic details (though the original's use of piston motors as illustrations was clever). Consolidate! Colonizers, are you aroused? Spıke¬ 17:58 2-Dec-09
Maybe a merge tag is in order. --Mn-z 17:16, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Delete'd and Redirect'd! -RAHB 22:47, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Mild Keep Not too bad and makes fun of the glacially paced, flashback plagued Gaara story arc in Naruto. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:12, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. The concept doesn't go anywhere right now, but it would be easy enough for someone to build on it. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:57, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. per the fixing and the nom + abstain. --Mn-z 17:13, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Never illustrate confusion by writing confusingly, and never illustrate repetition by writing repetitively. This cute concept does go somewhere: Over and over and over and over. Simply "over and over" would be a 100% improvement. Bad english, bad pics, no content. Spıke¬ 01:41 1-Dec-09
Comments
Okay, I'm about to start killing people. pillow talk 23:56, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
You're missing the point. WHY NOMINATE SOMETHING IF YOU DON'T WANT IT DELETED? the capital letters are for emphasis. pillow talk 00:03, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
What's done is done. This is not the time for questions; this is the time for answers. We must look forward to the future, not past to the back. The fate of this article rests in our hands. Godspeed, gentlemen. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 00:06, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
This will also be the last time. For future reference, you either nom and vote for or you don't nom. I'll consider any nom like that from now on as invalid. ~ 10:05, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Not vanity; Dave Thomas was indeed the founder of the Wendy's Restaurants chain (and ironically or not, died of heart failure). This article is a legitimate attempt to graft his life onto inappropriate events from the ancient past, though it's too long and frequently strays into randomness. Spıke¬ 14:30 30-Nov-09 PS--Thomas took on the role of pitch-man for a while, and many Americans have seen him on TV--though they don't see him in this article. The "heart attack" was apocryphal; Wikipedia (do we trust that?) says it was liver cancer. I've added a photo and MadMax has reformatted the quotes (though they still go on for way too long). Spıke¬ 19:16 30-Nov-09
Rewrite-tag. I don't find it funny, but it's not embarrassingly bad. Let's tag it rewrite and call it a day. pillow talk 19:27, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
Seems to have donated his final letter to that "Daves" person during the colloquy, a global failure of global-search-and-replace, I guess. Spıke¬ 00:42 1-Dec-09
MadMax did a global-search-and-unreplace on Socrate, producing three cases of Socratess, which I fixed. He then went to work on Daves, only to see that the author intended Daves as a Latin rendition of Dave, sigh. Spıke¬ 03:57 1-Dec-09
If this stays, I'll rewrite it if you like, but both the Colloquy and the Hagiography drag on for twice as long as necessary to make a point. I've already deleted "Take off, you hoser" (author breaks canon to steal a joke from the Canadian MacKenzies) and the final pair of quotes (essentially, "Don't call me 'Surely'" from Airplane) has to go as well. Spıke¬ 01:22 2-Dec-09
Mild Keep This is a rare example of bad concept/remarkable execution. The execution is good enough to make me not want to delete it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:39, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. per above. --Mn-z 17:11, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Made-up dialogues with Socrates are always funny, doubly so is Socrates is the pupil. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 22:52, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. On the plus side - the writer at least shows knowledge about or has read some ancient history. On the negative side - I just don't see where you can really join the dots and connect it with the article's subject header. Also if it is to be kept - the quotes in the middle have to moved or cut. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:04, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Created by an IP in 2007, it's still in a sorry state now. Nothing particularly stimulating in the history either. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:26, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete Um, what? Wild at Heart 01:41, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I loved Arrested Development. This dishonors it's memory shamefully. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:43, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
I just.. blue myself --Kip > Talk•Works•• 03:17, Dec. 3, 2009
Comments
I've deleted the second paragraph of the intro: "That was a witty joke, motherfuckers. Yeah nigga, yeah!" presuming vandalism. No opinion as to whether this article is notable or salvageable. Spıke¬ 02:16 3-Dec-09
Delete. Very bad sagacruft. —
EXTERMINATE!
Common sense
Keep. I fixed-ish it up. There was a lot of good stuff in there. It was buried under a little bit of crap, but it was easy enough to fix. This is not too bad if you know who Owens is. 
Comment. I remember some people liked this as an in-joke. Also, you might wanna read a bit about 
Fucking Keep. Because Spike fucking predicted it. 
![Frustration. No matter how many times you wacth[sic] this gif, it will never happen.](/wiki/File:Frusteration1.gif){kind=link}