This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Delete. GTA is a cruft all its own. Beat it with a baseball bat. Beat it like a hooker until an achievement pops out. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:09, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Incoherent. pillow talk 18:45, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 19:30, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
What Roman Dog Bird blurts out in boldface above is an exact caption from the article. Spıke¬ 01:06 17-Nov-09
Other gems include "Wow thats a shit to me." -- Also,penis. 01:43, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
I mentioned in earlier VFDs that there's something about this guy's pidgin English that's endearing! Spıke¬ 01:47 17-Nov-09
Grand Theft Auto: Hong Kong
Keep
Delete
Delete Seeing as I already ban myself on a regular basis. Also, after deletion of all of the series that are blatant construction tag abuse, this is what's left. -- Also,penis. 20:16, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
This author does not understand Uncyclopedia. Articles about plausible games that are just slightly more madcap than ones that actually exist are not what we do here. pillow talk 18:47, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 19:29, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Grand Theft Auto: Mexico City
Keep
Delete
Delete And if you look to your left... -- Also,penis. 20:02, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. But nominate them all and you'll be banned Spıke¬ 20:03 16-Nov-09
Delete. Die you shit! It's HZ Corp. + Grand Theft Auto. In joke plague meets generally failed generic concept. Do you even need to read it? --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:07, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Delete Them All. Seems we already have. Repeatedly. Spıke¬ 19:31 16-Nov-09
Delete. And I'm going to start protecting creation of these if no one objects. -- Also,penis. 19:52, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. (Was Comment) As of the end of October, this article was an infobox, sections of one or two sentences apiece, and interminable lists. Pelargonium made it a real article, and the only problem I have with it is that the "excitable fanboy" tone of voice....PS--Now I get it--that is the humor--medieval Khmer ruler vs fanboy with a new power game card. Again my problem with alternate narrating voices. Given this, it's within range of being decent. Spıke¬ 22:58 14-Nov-09 post-edited
Keep. per above. --Mn-z 05:29, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Strong keep. As a Civ 4 player, I find this very funny. Suryavarman II is a fucking horrible choice of ruler - it's like playing with a handicap - and for this guy to wax ecstatic about the Baray (a nearly-useless upgrade to a nearly-useless building) is pretty hilarious. pillow talk 18:47, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. I guess if you find excitable fanboy writing funny you might like this but this isn't even very good excitable fanboy writing. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:50, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Delete Because I'm such a rebel. A rebel without The Corrs, even. That joke only works with a British accent. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 01:54, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Whoops! Do you mean The Corrs? Spıke¬ 02:13 13-Nov-09
Delete them all. Unreadability does not make me laugh. pillow talk 02:22, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per Hype. --Mn-z 05:21, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
If you think even one article is worth keeping, I encourage you to vote keep. Let's not make this too complicated. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 02:23, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Um... So I'm thinking I might do that thing above which Socky suggested. Would that make people happy on this one? MrNFork you! 17:36, Nov 16
Not orgasmically happy, but the way I see it, deleting eight of them is better than deleting zero of them. pillow talk 18:10, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Just so we're entirely clear, THESE ARE JUST 2005 ARTICLES COPIED VERBATIM AND RUN THROUGH A TRANSLATOR. If anything, revert the current articles to the 2005 versions and delete the unreadable copies. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 22:36, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Huffed Well the ones in red anyway. Due to extreme UN:N I ignored the absence of the VFD tags. Let's not forget em next time. I do not want this multiple nominating of articles to become common place chaps. I'm letting it go on these as well... UN:N. If anyone wants to nominate those which are left one at a time be my guest. Apparently there is at-least 1 person who will vote keep. MrNFork you! 20:10, Nov 17
Garbage. Incidentally, isn't the Quaker Oats guy William Penn? pillow talk 18:15, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Called a "misconception" in his Wikipedia article. I call it the theme I was looking for. Spıke¬ 18:47 16-Nov-09 post-edited
Comments
Count, it's not clear we need any article on Eminem (the phenomenon is covered by Wigger) but we must have an article on Mr. Oats, this funny-looking icon of American breakfast-cereal gluttony. Illustrations are obvious. Foreigners might never have heard his only utterance: "Nothing is better for Thee...than me." That alone should set your mental oatmeal burbling. Fix it, please! Spıke¬ 16:45 16-Nov-09
Have brought in the obvious photo (needs Photoshopping), and rewritten Sec.1 and the caption of the other photo--don't yet know where to go from here; help! Spıke¬ 17:29 16-Nov-09
Comment. Shit, That's better then what I could come up with about The Quaker Oats guy. I would have just gone with Redirect->Wilford Brimley--Count of Monkey Crisco 18:19, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Spike: If you want to fix this, why vote keep? Why not just do a rewrite in your userspace, vote delete, and move your better rewrite where the old one used to be? pillow talk 18:48, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps because co-opting it through the usual editing procedure seemed less adversarial than killing and reviving it, though it does require people to change their votes. Same effect either way, and I'm adaptable. But I'm also done. Spıke¬ 19:37 16-Nov-09
Kept whatever it was you did, don't do it again. Except for the people who did good stuff. That was OK. MrNFork you! 01:25, Nov 17
Eminem
Keep
Keep. Admin: Please close this nomination. The article as it stands is brand new, a WiP, and not the one Colin nominated. pillow talk 01:12, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Something was huffed out-of-process while on VFD? Let's all start massive drama!!!1! pillow talk 16:35, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. I'm tired of this shit. I'm rewriting Eminem! It'll be a featured article by the end of the weeka solid article worthy of Uncyclopedia marginally adequate and probably kept out of VFD. --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:38, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
HZ Corps.]] second try
Keep
Delete
Delete. My nomination last week was disqualified for failure to attach {VFD} (corrected this time) plus the Work In Progess tag (but that has been there for the article's entire six-month life, while tiny changes are added every 3-5 days). HZ Corps. is the linchpin of the author's personal, fictional, unfunny universe, tying together articles such as Hajime Socialist Republic that we have deleted piecemeal. Modusoperandi gently asked him last week not to abuse WIP, and to try to be funny. The only effect I see is that he has switched to contributions via IP, perhaps so as to deny seeing these messages. Reading User talk:TKDKidXism suggests his reaction will be again to impolitely demand the restoration of this article in his namespace. Spıke¬ 16:39 16-Nov-09
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 16:47, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Bin it or give it a stay of execution on the user's page. If he (it must be a he) tries to repost it into the main body of the Uncyclopedia - automatic deletion (unless it was someone else causing trouble). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:59, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Unfunny, and those red links make me terrified that the author is going to expand this to massive, unfunny proportions. pillow talk 18:17, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Believing that the little that's here came from somewhere else, there's nothing here. Spıke¬ 14:27 16-Nov-09
Delete. My absolute least favorite kind of article: imported jokes that we fuck up. Makes us look like a bunch of fucking twats. pillow talk 18:39, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I am having a very difficult time finding a joke in here. pillow talk 18:31, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Kept Dude, it's still in {{Expand}} as it's new. Let's do what we normally do. MrNFork you! 19:02, Nov 16
Shawne Merriman
Keep
Delete
Delete. Short and horrible. Older version are even worse. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:49, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Weak Delete. Article about an actual US football player basically has only one joke (steroids!). Putting it in Intensive Care at the end of 2006 only produced an inversion of the table. Author "Quadzilla99" left us in Sep-07; article got no attention in the off-season; recently incorporates real-life news on domestic assault. Notable in the real world, but not funny. I'd say offer the authors one final week to say something real, but there don't seem to be any authors. Spıke¬ 17:12 14-Nov-09
Delete, along with all sports articles not written by Gerrycheevers or, occasionally, RAHB. pillow talk 19:39, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. "Vandalism" sums it up. Spıke¬ 12:11 11-Nov-09
Delete. - No need to keep this junk around, poor hamsters are hard-pressed as they are to keep this site going... -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 21:30, 11 Nov
Delete. I dot like it and niobody does because it is gay and stupid and ugly and retarted and fat. pillow talk 18:21, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Best deleted and left behind the bike sheds. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:16, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
Delete, and feel free to copy/paste this comment to a VFD vote of any of the other archives. They're all useless, and in the history anyway. Also, the terrible archive and rules template at the top of the main page. Also Syndrome. •Spang•☃•talk• 04:31, 14 Nov 2009
Delete these pages are also prone to mis/over-categorization. And due to wikia's evil spam-blocking software, and images blocking the navigation bars, they are often a bitch to fix. --Mn-z 05:17, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Would somebody enlighten me to exactly what makes this different than any of the other vandalism archives? It doesn't seem there would be any good reason to delete just one of them... -- Also,penis. 20:57, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
My guess is that deleting #6 would leave a hole in the archives, which would be vandalism in and of itself. So this vote is really just an avant-garde sort of neo-vandalism designed to use the institution to vandalize its own byproducts: the sequestration and containment of undirected vandalism. Bravo, Socky. Bravo. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 23:13, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
RAHB: Mordillo's pretty consistently ruled that you have to take pages one at a time... and... so, since I think this particular page has no redeeming value, I favor deleting it. We can get to the others later. pillow talk 23:21, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
Fair enough, the votes will say what they do. I just thought it rather odd to start with number 6, when they're pretty much all incoherent. If this one ends delete though I expect to see the others up on here within the week. -- Also,penis. 01:24, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
I'd also say that any vote here would equally apply to all the other archives, as there's basically no difference between any of them. Voting on all at once would be a lot more efficient. •Spang•☃•talk• 04:33, 14 Nov 2009
Keept -- Also,penis. 05:42, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Hanakuso
Keep
Delete
Delete Harder Than You've Ever Deleted Before. No... no, no, no. Just no. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:37, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I happen to know that "Hanakuso" is Japanese for "booger." But the article has no connection to its title. pillow talk 03:52, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Killa $aL
Keep
Delete
DeleteDo we really need listcruft about a Myspace rapper? The notability is borderline, but the article is still unfunny. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 01:03, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Am ignorant about rap and can never tell whether an article's awfulness comes from its subject matter or is added value. But this article's first paragraph, in bold capitals, pleads that it is funny and explains why it is satire of things Killa $al has "raped" about. That's got to be worth something. Spıke¬ 01:17 15-Nov-09
Eric al-Qaida Raymond
Keep
Delete
Delete There is an Eric Raymond in the open-source movement, but this is more likely vanity. Spıke¬ 18:55 14-Nov-09
Madness? No! This is Sparta! ...no, actually it's madness. pillow talk 19:41, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Found while searching for meep, a word that local high-school principals are treating with suspensions and frantic phone calls to parents, although they don't know what it means. There is also a redirect page without "al-Qaida." Spıke¬ 18:57 14-Nov-09
Modern Warfare 2
Keep
Delete
Vape it . Too old for ICU, so I'll put it here. Anyway, page sucks. --AndorinKato 04:27, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Shoop da Whoop shows its ugly, unfunny head again. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:38, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Baleet -- Also,penis. 04:44, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Two things. First of all, keep, and second of all, there is absolutely no fucking way that one vote is going to decide the fate of that many pages. If the subpage thing is a problem, we'll move them to their own pages. -- Also,penis. 04:06, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Keep Sadly, this is one of the biggest draws to Uncyclopedia. I think this all used to be on Stereotype before some noob rewrote it. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 06:40, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Unlike the recent Mohammed drawing, this is stereotyping with a direct nexus to comedy. However, the intro promises that the article will include cruft as in the various infoboxes, and I'd hate to see that happen. Spıke¬ 12:30 15-Nov-09
Delete Created this page for the previously abandoned sub-pages of Stereotype which have a slight list-cruft feel to them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byPuppyOnTheRadio (talk • contribs)
Delete. This is actually worse than Spuppy. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:38, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Have a dumb idea and tirelessly pursue all the implications, sort of like the movie Cocoon.Spıke¬ 17:29 14-Nov-09
Weak delete. Much of it is coherent, but the more you read, the more tedious and unfunny and annoying it gets. pillow talk 19:38, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
As the evil corporate creator of this half-breed is "Beauville Industries" and not HZ Corps., I trust there aren't twenty other interrelated articles on the site. Am now sick of clever Photoshopping in pursuit of a failed concept, and have changed my vote from Comment to Delete on Elephant Thursday. Spıke¬ 17:29 14-Nov-09
richard
Keep
Delete
Delete. What is it? A personal attack without the venom? A terrible fake animal aricle? Structured wibble? --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:27, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It's either vanity or cyber-bullying, despite finally mentioning Kings of the same name. Spıke¬ 17:16 14-Nov-09
Delete. I actually don't think it's vanity or cyber-bullying; I think it's a terrible fake animal article. pillow talk 19:36, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Just horrible in ALL departments. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:07, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Meh..smells of cyberbullying. Especially the Richard Harmon part.-- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 23:57, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Fiend_Club
Keep
Delete
Smite. Here's the summary: Boring paragraph, random paragraph, boring paragraph, giant list, giant unfunny quote collection. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:03, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Summary above is accurate, but omits that the sum is total crap. Spıke¬ 18:08 13-Nov-09
Crap. Trivia: you were raped by your best friend. pillow talk 19:35, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Junk. Now everyone laugh after you have read this line : Al Gore came and rapped a pirate and won best homoboner award at the rigged golden globe awards...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:12, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Long on lists, short on humor. Full of spelling and grammar errors.-- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 23:59, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Big
Keep
Delete
Delete. Fun fact: we huffed seven shitty versions of this article, and then in 2006, we decided to let this one stay. I don't know why... pillow talk 18:24, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It sure is one ugly mother of an article. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:16, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Nena
Keep
Keep. Crap keep. Remove the rubbish and it may live on in my view since 99 red balloons and Nena's unshaved armpits live on in the memory. Perhaps Nena helped bring down the Berlin Wall. --RomArtus (talk). 14:03, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete We still have more than 25,000 articles. We're obviously not deleting enough. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 01:08, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Notable subject matter, but this article is too bad to hide behind that excuse. •••Necropaxx(T){~}Wednesday, 21:44, Nov 11 2009
Delete. You can't just name a celebrity, poop out a hundred Internet memes and Uncyclopedia in-jokes, and call that an article. pillow talk 18:13, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Compared to Zach de la Rocha, this isn't a stupid concept (except for Sections 3 and 4) but a topical article with stupid jokes. Spıke¬ 12:51 9-Nov-09
Barton Mansion
Keep
Keepish A little funny and based on a real "haunted" mansion. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:08, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Dittoes; it's not free-association babble but oddly describes something real. Spıke¬ 12:10 10-Nov-09
Delete
Delete. NOT FUNNY. pillow talk 18:21, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Mighty Keep. On grounds of notability, being one of my favorite bands and the relative non-suckiness of the current version. •FreddThe Redd••• 11:36, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
Mahm00shA, you seem to have a little time to improve this article to meet the standards of a reader like Romartus. Will you try? Spıke¬ 01:18 7-Nov-09
No, thanks. Band articles are not exactly my forte. •FreddThe Redd••• 05:50, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Well, I edited it. (New intro, deleted the "Discography" list, lightly edited throughout, no references to the author.) I know nothing about the band but claim the article is no longer an eyesore. (Anyone have photos?) Spıke¬ 12:19 7-Nov-09
I think it has been cut down too much now + no photos either. Radical surgery indeed !--RomArtus (talk). 14:10, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Put back the Discography if you like, which is the bulk of the liposuction. But it's just cheap plays on words. Spıke¬ 17:27 8-Nov-09
Delete. Gawdawful bandcruft that will probably never receive the rewrite that someone requested at some point. pillow talk 18:12, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Unfunny and it is listing badly on one side. Besides fans - who else will want to waste time reading it for any possible humour ? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:37, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
But if fans found it funny (and if fans found that it related to anything) (and I'm not saying it does), wouldn't it be okay? Spıke¬ 18:42 5-Nov-09
If someone wants to write an article about a band (for example) and only wants to appeal to hard core fans , they can do it somewhere else. Same for a mad Star Trek fan as well in my view.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 19:00, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Nuke. I'm a NW fan too, but I would still like to see a -decent- uncyc page about them. Something that invokes laughter. --Dark_ApostropheThe Memory Hole 02:12, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
It does suck. The first sentence of the intro says so. And it invites the reader not to continue. I did, and encountered everything from self-absorption to coding errors. Spıke¬ 01:54 6-Nov-09
Keep. Gee guys, didn't realise Uncyclopedia was becoming so strict about taste! Just cos' you don't not all appreciate the subtle humour doesn't mean it should be deleted. How about suggesting ways it could be improved before calling for its destruction. Digi 20:17, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I can't say I'm a huge fan of the article, but don't think it's too bad. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 08:49, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Juvenile sex jokes in their lowest, unfunniest state.--Count of Monkey Crisco 22:41, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. In the quaint old days, they would say this is in bad taste with no redeeming qualities, certainly not the second half, a slapped-together news report about reaction to the lack of taste in the first half, which adds more bad taste. Spıke¬ 23:24 9-Nov-09
Delete. Totally inapropriate and we wouldn't want to offend anyone now would we? -OptyCSucks! CUN18:04, 12 Nov
Comments
This is one of those articles that may actually predict what will happen with a future Porn Version of Strictly Come Dancing or Dancing With the Stars. Unless...it has already been made...--RomArtus (talk). 13:19, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. @Digi: My suggestions for improvement would boil down to "See this section? Get rid of it and try again." repeated five times. Each section is pathetic in its own little way, from the dry and unnecessary section one, the dead horse beating section two, the nothing-but-list section three, the not completely awful but grammatically lousy section four and the desperate for content section five. It's a bad idea, badly executed. Whether it's tasteful or not doesn't figure into it.
Abstain. I can't read it, because I'm at work and there's a giant picture of a naked girl at the top. pillow talk 18:17, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
She's not naked. No nipples honest boss. MrNFork you! 18:08, Nov 13
She is naked. If you're not wearing any clothes, there's no pose you can strike that renders you clothed again. •Spang•☃•talk• 04:34, 14 Nov 2009
She has got socks on. You just can't see them. MrNFork you! 04:41, Nov 14
Delete. Today is Operation: Emo-Hitler. Time to delete all the cruft that links to Emo-Hitler. This is such cruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:16, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
My new article on Baha'i links to Emo-Hitler, and you'd better not complain. Spıke¬ 19:02 12-Nov-09
Delete. As an article , it has a few sane moments but quickly reverts to a non-flying Randumbo given half the chance. --RomArtus (talk). 09:40, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
Deleting articles that refer to Emo-Hitler is again trying to kill a beast by clipping its toenails. We recently VFD'ed Hajime Socialist Republic as an unfunny piece of some guy's personal alternate reality universe. Today I stumbled on the central piece, HZ Corps., and nominated it for deletion while it was being edited. (Nomination correctly disqualified for technical reasons, though he seems to be misusing the WIP tag.) Modusoperandi has written to the author about why his articles are mysteriously disappearing and how to get them into shape. Likewise, here Emo-Hitler is the smallest of the problems. The larger problem is that the author will continue writing cruft, even though articles keep mysteriously disappearing, unless someone steers him in a funnier direction so we don't have to play catch-up. The problem with Emo-Hitler is the impression that dropping outrageous names is writing comedy. Spıke¬ 22:53 9-Nov-09 post-edited
Which author? Every Article in Project: Emo-Hitler has had a different author. I think Emo-Hitler is funny to morons, morons write cruft so The link page on Emo-Hitler is just a handy hunting guide for cruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:53, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
It is a wonderful world when morons wear such a badge on their foreheads. Spıke¬ 23:57 9-Nov-09
The article itself has a theme (albeit a made-up one), is about something (and about everything, and thus about nothing), and is mostly babble. But I won't vote Delete (yet), on the strength of those elephant illustrations.Spıke¬ 00:01 10-Nov-09
Keep. Coz my vote is the king maker and I decided to keep it. muhahahaha Stupidis4eva! 19:36, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I had to get all the way through the horrible intro to realize that it was demonstrating hubris, and pretty well. And "believing oneself to be of particular excellance" [sic] is excellant irony, though the author won't know. Yes, it's short and dumb, but kind of cute. Ditto on the list. Spıke¬ 01:53 8-Nov-09
Keep. Same as SPIKE. •••Necropaxx(T){~}Wednesday, 21:41, Nov 11 2009
Delete. The history of this article is really quite remarkable. It's been rewritten and rewritten and rewritten - about five times in the last year alone. And every single version is shite. pillow talk 18:27, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Formerly Keep. Very stupid in places. Very clever in others (Bigfoot Dating Ad, which I thought was going to be stupid). It's obvious what the stupid places are and how to fix them. I did a light edit on it and there is not that much that's not a toilet joke. Deletion would be a big first step in getting someone to start over. Spıke¬ 04:36 13-Nov-09
Delete What a mess. Unless someone takes this on for CW, delete it. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:43, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Yes, it kind of sucks. Yes, it's injokey. Yes, it's got too many templates. Yes, the writing is klunky. Yes, it's headache inducing. I've lost my train of thought. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:08, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. This afternoon, I was feeling bummed because no one ever gave me admin tools so I can ban Cajek. But then I realized that what I can do, is I can nominate his userpage for deletion. pillow talk 04:06, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Delete Not enough nudity images. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 04:42, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Delete I was listening to Gnarls Barkley, then this caught my eye. Now I'm still listening to Gnarls Barkley, but I'm doing so while voting to delete Cajek's Userpage. Where the Wild Colins Are -LET THE WILDRUMPUS START! 15:31, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Keep This is used on some pages. I certainly don't want it used on any more pages, but it's fine where it is. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 14:00, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. It's not bad, it doesn't hurt anyone, it can have it uses. ~ 14:35, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Can't we just ban everyone from making templates without permission? It's not like they're ever funny and only a tiny proportion are actually useful. --SirDJ~Irreverent 12:17, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
This set of templates seems to facilitate intrusive, garish graphics. It isn't "useless"; I simply don't like the use (any more than overuse of fonts, or "ransom-note typography"), but that's a policy question I'll leave to youse. Spıke¬ 11:08 2-Nov-09
Ten days, no clear winner. Keep'd. Also, invalid nomination, no VFD template. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 01:30, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
delete. allows for repetitive unfunny pointlessness. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:55, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. Can't see a reason people would use it. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Potentially useful to tile a background image, as I tried to do recently (Forum:CSS background-image). In actual use only in one article, which would improve immediately by not doing so. Spıke¬ 10:52 2-Nov-09
I set out to be italic and delete the section of Encyclopedia Dramatica (Website) that is the only use of this template, rendering it less of an eyesore and making this template an orphan. But ED is protected. VFD for it, perhaps? Spıke¬ 18:10 5-Nov-09
There are limits of being italic and I encourage you to never delete a template from any pages it resides on while it's on VFD. ~ 14:34, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Ten days, no clear winner. Keep'd. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 01:28, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Knowing little about Danny Phantom most of those descriptions seemed like straight up episode recaps. Those that were more obviously an attempt at humor were eather bad and name-droppy or random and desperate.--Count of Monkey Crisco 06:59, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. This is what the iCarly article would have looked like without the newts and pedophilia. pillow talk 18:19, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
The humor is crappy but, again, the article is about a real show. It is a giant list because the author set out to work individual episodes with cheap plays on words rather than writing cleverly. This isn't unique or even rare; after our discussion (below) on Nightwish, I went to Yes (band), and it is the same crap. It would be nice if the author had invented a theme, perhaps a humorous misunderstanding, and stuck to it through the article. It would be nice if all our anonIPs were funny. They aren't, and there are bigger fish to fry. Spıke¬ 02:17 11-Nov-09
Great Peruvian Biscuit Crisis of 2009
Keep
Keep Due to reasons involving a close female relative of yours. MrNFork you! 22:30, Nov 11
If the above is to say, Yo mama! then would we count this as a Weak keep? Spıke¬ 13:26 12-Nov-09
Delete
Delete. Mostly wibble, written in 2008 and failed to occur. We can tolerate wibble, but false prophets must be expunged. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:35, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Indeed, it admits at the end that it is history-of-the-future. As your curator for articles on Peru, I would volunteer to save this if it had anything to do with Peru. But I willhave moved toLima, Peru the photo of a llama in the middle of the Via Expresa. Spıke¬ 17:48 9-Nov-09 post-edited
Delete. As usual , a choice quote sums this up : The Emocaust began in late 2010, and was the direct result of Emo-Hitler's meddling with the space-time continuum to prevent the deaths of My Chemical Romance in a tragic boating accident in late 2007. WTF ? --RomArtus (talk). 13:09, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It tries to be zany but just ends up being random. pillow talk 18:15, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Robotech
Keep
Delete
Delete. It's random, it's name-droppy, it's almost incoherent, it's been here since 2006 with few edits and no improvement. Time to get rid. --UU - natter13:18, Nov 9
Delete. Night soil. --RomArtus (talk). 13:55, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I'm usually lenient with templates but this is even below my standards. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:36, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Tagging articles with an irrelevant warning label--and this one is guaranteed to be irrelevant to almost all articles (like Law)--has reached the level of an insider's cliché. Spıke¬ 14:40 9-Nov-09
Delete. Never got the expansion promised by the author in '08. The main article isn't that good either, but if I added it there'd be over 20 vfd's... —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!)
Comment: Actually, since one of the 20 listed articles has officially been kept, you could list one more and not get blocked. --AndorinKato 07:23, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
True! the warning above is so scary that people usually don't go close to 20. Spıke¬ 12:01 10-Nov-09
Delete. Quickly. And the main article too. Spıke¬ 12:04 10-Nov-09
Keep. It isn't a total disaster (the list isn't any good and lazy) but at least this one doesn't go off at a tangent and change the subject half way through like of lot of the death row candidates in here. --RomArtus (talk). 13:14, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Needs work, and it really needs to mention Doctor Who. But not too bad. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 08:53, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Seems like an attempt to write an essay around an odd photograph. It isn't funny yet, and yes, the list is crap, but I'd like to see it evolve (if it were about anything). Spıke¬ 23:19 9-Nov-09
Delete. Slightly better than the title suggests, which still makes it very shabby. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:22, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. The French and their military history are easy to ridicule--but this article, like Gay nigger sex, doesn't begin to deal with its subject. Spıke¬ 22:58 9-Nov-09
Keep. Unlike most of the articles below, this is about something, it is the joy of stereotyping, and it's funny in places. It's ugly and childish, proposing that people I don't like get shot to death, but it could be whipped into shape. Drop the dumb Latin taxonomy and the long list of translations. Spıke¬ 12:22 6-Nov-09
Keep. Apparently an article about Liverpool's working class. It's got enough good in it that I'd rather let the editorial process work it out. pillow talk 22:09, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Evidently the writer isn't from Liverpool but the overall tone is hateful rather than funny and so I don't think it deserves a stay of execution. --RomArtus (talk). 14:14, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
I just think it'd fare better with deletion. If one of the keep-voters would like, they can start from scratch. The article makes no sense and constitutes prime crap, nothing more. Were I able to, I'd probably just have torched the thing... -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 14:24, 8 Nov
It's fixable. Needs a serious hacking to it, but it's not all carp. Get Mhaille to do it. MrNFork you! 21:47, Nov 9
Why do you always pick on him? Can't you do the {{rewrite}} stuff yourself, Pa?! The time he'd use to fix this stinker up would be retracted from my hopefully first feature he's helping me with... :/ -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 08:39, 10 Nov
Rewrite? Na. I cut out some crap and now it's not so. Not really a rewrite. MrNFork you! 16:06, Nov 10
Keep. There is funny there, only it's all been hidden so the non-comic book nerds can't see it. •••Necropaxx(T){~}Wednesday, 21:32, Nov 11 2009
Delete
Delete. Whoever tagged this "rewrite" was so generous that if he were an Olympic judge, I would win the bronze in figure skating. pillow talk 16:11, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
For Hype entering the Olympics. Delete this though. --UU - natter16:58, Oct 28
Delete. Can I come second in the rowing? --ChiefjusticeDS 14:39, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I liked Blue Beetle in Yellow Submarine. Or is he that Olympic gymnast who wears the blue leotard? WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:03, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
delete. one of those articles that keep votes for it make me want to leave uncyclopedia. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:24, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I think it's far too soon to re-nominate this one: Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive189#:File:Mohammedlickingcock.jpg.E2.80.8E. In fact, I've been scolded more than once for renominating articles that have been nominated less recently than this. It's clear that at least half a dozen users want it kept, and that's always been enough for us to keep something in the past. pillow talk 20:36, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Strong Keep. Those that are offended can simply not look at it, which is what I do when something offends me, or when the sun's in my eyes. —UnführerGuildyRittervonGuildensternenstein 21:08, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Keep as I see no reason to delete it. --AndorinKato 22:04, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I agree with Guildy, the image is in bad taste if you add it to an article, but if you want it in your user space then fine, nobody has to look at it there. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:14, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Keep I don't like the image, but these discussions alone make it worth keeping. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 22:24, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Looks like the discussion is over now. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:31, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. While I do believe that every user to entitled to his own opinion, this image has no humour value, done in a bad taste and is offending to my heritage. •FreddThe Redd••• 20:56, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I have no problem with one man orally-pleasuring another; but this image seems created specifically to be offensive to Muslims. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 20:52, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Dittoes to WHY?, especially as (1) it isn't a caricature, (2) it doesn't use gestures or props to make any particular statement, and (3) it has an Arabic label. As for userspace freedom, "What links here" doesn't show any page using it.Spıke¬ 21:19 11-Nov-09 post-edited
How '*do* you disable a piccie pic in a link? I've been struggling with it, and the only way I've managed to pull it off is by inserting the entire URL and making a link out of it. O_o -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 20:37, 11 Nov
You can instruct a wikilink not to resolve into a picture or category, etc., by putting a colon in front of it, like Category:My sojourn or File:Mohammedlickingcock.jpg. Or is that not what you meant? pillow talk 20:41, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
I think that's what I meant. O_o Why did you vote keep? I've seen drawings of monks fucking nuns be deleted on sight, why not other religious figures? -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 20:47, 11 Nov
They were deleted cos those nuns were ugly. Real mingers. MrNFork you! 20:52, Nov 11
If I want to watch a hairy faced monster, I just open a window with EugeneKay's stalker cam on. Don't need to look at hairy faced guys licking cocks. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 20:55, 11 Nov
I basically voted keep because I feel like we've already had this vote - and just a couple months ago, at that. I know that Ape passionately wants this kept and that Dexter, MrN, Socky, and Bonner also voted keep. And there's no evidence anything's changed. So this is a pointless nomination unless the point is to try to slip it past them, and I wouldn't support that... pillow talk 21:11, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
I didn't know there was a vote on the matter, and I strongly feel that it's good if it's voted on, even if it is "again". If someone opposes that, they can just hit the ban-button next to my name if they have one... -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 21:18, 11 Nov
I'd be in favor of taking this off of an article, but not from the site altogether. If a user wants it on his talkpage, it's his right. Where the Wild Colins Are -LET THE WILDRUMPUS START! 21:08, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
POSSIBLE POLICY VIOLATION. It appears to me this image specifically violates Wiki policy in regard to sites that have googleads (which this site does). According to Wikia:Prohibited content, "All Wikia which are supported by the use of advertisements from Google must adhere to Google's AdSense policy, which means that certain content is prohibited." These include "Pornography, adult or mature content" and "Content related to racial intolerance or advocacy against any individual, group or organisation." Regardless of our feelings on freedom of speech, freedom of religions, respect for the individual, etc., if this violates a single policy of our host site, it needs to be removed. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:15, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
By my understanding, "fair use" has nothing to do with whether or not an image is considered pornographic. We can argue about interpretations all we want, but if the people who are giving the money to keep this site up believe we're violating their policies.... WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:20, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
There's no google ads on Uncyclopedia. ~ 21:21, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
There are on my computer; there's three at the bottom of this page. But perhaps those are added by my current browser; I'll try another browser and see if they still come up. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:27, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
If you're going to take this down because of this policy (which as pointed out above might not even apply to this site) then you're going to have a lot of work on your hands getting an admin to remove every single image on Uncyclopedia that might potentially offend someone somewhere. Let's ask ourselves: Is that really the direction we want the wiki to go? --AndorinKato 22:09, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Even better, remove the Arabic. The archive of Mordillo's talk page contains a photo that declares its intention to offend Muslims--without actually doing so. Spıke¬ 21:27 11-Nov-09
Actually, I'm pretty sure there are Muslims who would cut my fucking head off for making that picture. pillow talk 22:18, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Personally, I don't find it funnier and find it just as offensive. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:39, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
POSSIBLE POLICY VIOLATION NUMBER TWO. Wiki terms of use, which I assume we are required to follow, says we may not "Post, upload, transmit, share, or store content which is unlawful, defamatory, infringing, obscene, or invasive of another's right to privacy or publicity". While Muhammed is not a living person, "defamatory" can, in certain cases, be extended to the living, especially in regard to people who are identified as Muhammmed or who are followers of him. That, admittedly, is stretching a point. But there is the matter of copyright. While Uncyclopedia claims faire use for satirical purposes, the use of this picture doesn't seem to be a matter of satirizing the image. In fact, it's presenting the image itself. For example, if I post an image of Monty Python's sketch on the Silly Party and claim it's an accurate representation of current politics in Britain, that could possibly be regarded as satire. But if I just post the image on my user page, that is not satire, and is likely not protected. Do we know who owns the copyright to this image? WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:55, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
If you're going to get into discussing copyright, I have this to add: If whoever owns the copyright on the image (assuming there's an original and that it is copyrighted) comes to Uncyclopedia and complains about copyright infringement, then we can examine the possibility of taking it down. Until then (and possibly even then), we get to claim fair use all we want. This is a parody website, and parody is an example of fair use. It is that simple. --AndorinKato 22:01, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Also, as I said above... would you use the ToU as a precedent to remove every potentially offensive image from Uncyclopedia, or are you going to selectively use the non-obscene/defamatory clause to remove this one image that you just don't happen to like? From the beginning Uncyclopedia has been about parody and not caring about people being offended by it. Remember Anonymous Slashy, anyone? Nobody took down the Asperger's Syndrome article when he complained about it being offensive. Why should we do so here, considering that have a wiki full of offensive content because that's exactly what we are? --AndorinKato 22:14, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Is this a website for How To Be Offensive And Not Just Stupid? I thought the point here was to be funny. Personally, I don't find an image of one man orally pleasuring another to be offensive or funny--depending on the context. But I fail to see how the context of posting this on a user page is designed to be funny. I understand that this site has had a drop in productive editors. Potentally offending a huge percentage of possible future editors without humour doesn't seem to be me a wise idea. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:26, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Sannse huffed this because it violates Wikia's terms of use, as I thought. Please forgive me while I gloat. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:32, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
OK, this is getting far too personal and petty now, yes you were right, but there's no reason to try and annoy everyone else by posting that here, the image is gone, fair enough, now let us return to the whole writing thing that we all hang around this place for. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:35, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, Chiefster, for the slap, which I deserved. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 22:51, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
You're all a bunch of faggots with nothing better to do
than start drama to make yourselves feel more important. This picture is funny as fuck to me and it's only in two users' pages. Your claims of being "offended" are thinner than the paper I wipe my ass with. Whatever, do what you will. Cry to sannse, claim the moral highground, whatever to help you sleep at night. Just know that you're not fooling me. -OptyCSucks! CUN22:45, 11 Nov
(Reposting my apparently accidentally deleted comment of half an hour ago): I don't even know how to get to IRC. Is that located near Guildford? WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 23:13, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
They're fooling me. It should be said, though, that I am easily fooled. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 22:54, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Whoa. I pressed refresh and there were like, four new messages. Dude! •••Necropaxx(T){~}Wednesday, 23:02, Nov 11 2009
My guess is that the edits via the quick edit application mess things up, as it doesn't refresh the page being edited, just edits the page and saves. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 23:04, 11 Nov
Good; I was hoping it was an accident or some computer glitch. The wonders of modern technology. Also I made a comment about IRC that seems to be missing; I'll look for it and try to repost. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 23:10, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure about the "faggots" portion, but you're correct about us having nothing better to do.
That thing that I said in the header. (Oh, and Keep for that drawing that got deleted) SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:15, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
Anna Williams (Full blown Tail Arts)
Keep
Delete
Vape it. As an unregistered user was kind enough to point out, this page is crappy crappy carp. Nomming it for him because VFD is semi-locked. --AndorinKato 03:15, November 10, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. The only purpose of this sprawling article is to tie together this kid's alternate reality, some of whose fictional countries we have already voted to delete. I do enjoy his pidgin English, though. Spıke¬ 18:05 9-Nov-09
Comments
Double invalid nomination. WIP tag & no VFD tag. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:11, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
Vape it. --AndorinKato 00:51, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
Raep! Looking at the discussion page, and the last parts of the article, some IPs got pissed off at the writer and actually responded to parts of the article in the article...still, delete. —PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!)
Delete. Am no student of grues, but this heap of babbling is gruesome. Spıke¬ 01:57 8-Nov-09
Delete Scientologists? The month of dismember? That's some quality imitation 2005cruft there. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 03:10, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Did you notice editor AwEsUm quotes himself at the top of the article? Spıke¬ 01:45 8-Nov-09
Delete. It's so horribly rubbish that it almost has a weird beauty about it : Marconi conceptualized this theorem while eating pasta with his mother on a thursday. Damn...I wish I had thought of that ! --RomArtus (talk). 14:26, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. There a good concept buried in there, buried good. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:51, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Just the intro loses me. Free association, lists of characters, epic battles, no underlying topic, no point. Spıke¬ 01:29 7-Nov-09
Delete. Bizarre intro ! WTF indeed !! Perhaps the person who wrote it was on some recreational cigarettes. --RomArtus (talk). 14:19, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Appears to be about an obscure video game, then becomes a vanity article about an online group of fans of that game. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:08, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Vijay
Keep
Keep Definitely a real noteworthy person. His name is Joseph Vijay. Yeah if you don't delete it until Xmas I will try to improve it, coz I am sorta busy now till mid November. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byStupidis4eva! (talk • contribs)
Probably says it's the usual fare on VFD: Two pages of aimless free association around an otherwise notable topic. The vote by "Stupidis4eva!" could be taken as an offer to fix this; that would divert him from his recent edit war. Spıke¬ 14:19 4-Nov-09
--And today I invited him to volunteer, though I don't claim you should wait for his reply. Spıke¬ 00:59 6-Nov-09
Delete. On a scale of funny from "AIDS" to "a monkey wearing two tuxedos," I give this "a trip to the dentist." pillow talk 21:23, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
Trip to the Rectal surgeon•••Necropaxx(T){~}Wednesday, 21:57, Nov 4 2009
Old versions suggest that Vijay is a Bollywood actor or producer; Wikipedia lists four such, two relating to Tamil, mentioned in the article. So the article isn't vanity. That doesn't mean it's any good. The most significant thing to happen to it in 2009 was repeated blanking. Perhaps notify the authors and give them a week to type something that makes sense. Spıke¬ 01:51 4-Nov-09
Keep. It's pathetic for being a feature, but it's not the kind of shit we delete. pillow talk 01:59, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Keep WTF are you trying to delete a featured article for? Isn't there a guideline for this kind of bull. Anyway If it feel it's devaited too far from the featured version there a thing called revert. Read Rule 2.1: Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion." --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 11:23, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
Abstain Maybe revert to the featured version? Then again, it was featured in 2005...—PaizuriMUN (Talk•Contribs•Poll!)
Playful but very ugly. Neither the concept nor the material compels one's interest. (How many ways could I imagine a change to reality? Why would anyone else care about any of them?) Long title, use of first person in title, intro written by a pre-teen, and a three-digit table of contents made it hard to go beyond. It needs more than hidden gems; it needs somehow to make you want to read it. Spıke¬ 01:25 7-Nov-09
Figured I ought to point out that I've reverted to the version of the page at the time of the successful feature. (I still don't think it's very good, tho.) --AndorinKato 11:38, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Looks like a useless template. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Pretty much a failed experiment.--Count of Monkey Crisco 22:05, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. So ugly, I would rather take a dump, fish it out of the toilet, frame it, hang it on my wall, and look at that. pillow talk 23:14, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. Can't see a reason people would use it. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Docile, when putting templates on VFD, please remember to use <noinclude> tags. Otherwise you're tagging every page that uses the template for VFD. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 18:18, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
OK sorry didn't think to do that. --Docile hippopotamus 01:54, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
Template:Rainbow
Keep
Keep. Just because it's useless doesn't mean several people aren't using it.--Count of Monkey Crisco 22:07, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Looks like a useless template. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. The litmus test is: does this template make Barbie, Jeopardy, and Viacom better or worse? The answer is: worse. pillow talk 22:34, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete and purge. The only legitimate use of this is userpage vandalism. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:37, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Shut the hell up guys Repeating the title of an article in big flashy rainbows is the zenith of all human achievement. --SirDJ~Irreverent 12:22, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. Can't see a reason people would use it. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Would you say that you can't see a reason people would use it, then? pillow talk 00:15, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
August Strindberg
Keep
Weak keep I don't know anything about the subject, but this stub seems to provide at least something of a start. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 20:15, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
Weak keep. As Syndrome says, there is enough here for someone to salvage. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:37, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Not notable enough to justify the rewrite tag. pillow talk 21:05, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Strindberg is extremely notable and deserves a notable article. This one has had 3 1/2 years to become notable. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:08, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
Nah If you were to cut away all the shite there would be about one sentence to salvage. I'm reasonably confident that if someone were to write this again we'd get a better sentence anyway. This isn't some Pokemon or Naruto thing you're going to get replaced in 6 hours either. --SirDJ~Irreverent 12:33, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Wikipedia says "He is arguably the most influential of all Swedish authors, and one of the most influential Scandinavian authors" I'd call that pretty notable. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM23:21, 22 October 2009
I'm not too impressed by the article. However, there's a really nice bar/Restaurant in Helsinki named after the guy... ^_^ -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 21:23, 29 Oct
The Rosalixion
Keep
Delete
Delete Is an article about an amateur book vanity? I think so. Is it unfunny? Looks like it. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 13:40, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. A magnet for anonIP free-association. Can't even tell if there really is an amateur book. Spıke¬ 13:51 6-Nov-09
Delete. The author appears to be named after a character in the book. I'm fairly comfortable calling this vanity. I'm very comfortable saying it didn't make me laugh. pillow talk 22:13, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Better suited for ?pedia. pillow talk 18:25, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. No one will ever again care about GW Bush's dog. The Bush jokes might not have been as trite when the article was actually written; but the article has never been about anything. Spıke¬ 18:46 5-Nov-09
Delete. There are two versions of this page: the current one, and this one, and I hate them both. pillow talk 18:15, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Article's biggest benefit is to let any reference to night be a wikilink to pad your count. Entire first section of the current one is an inside Uncyclopedia joke from a joker who is not an insider. The old one is built around the two very naughtiest words in English: penis and Jew. See ya. Spıke¬ 18:40 5-Nov-09
Delete. Written in Oct'06 because "homework sucks"; nearly unchanged since then. Homework does suck. Spıke¬ 18:30 5-Nov-09
Delete. This is not random. It refers to a very nice short animation which you can look up on Youtube and which I highly recommend watching. Conversely I do not recommend this article for anything but elimination. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:08, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Nigel Calder
Keep
Delete
Delete So, this one time, this one guy wrote an article about a "famous" global warming skeptic, except it was really about nothing at all. pillow talk 18:05, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Just as I was thinking 'perhaps' or 'maybe' - it finished with a long useless list. Its fate was Sealed with a List.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:28, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. The list is lifted from Wikipedia and slightly altered to be "funny." You can ridicule Calder. Or his critics. Or both. Just do something.Spıke¬ 18:48 5-Nov-09
Delete. I'm surprised Romartus got to "Maybe". --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:16, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Template:Rainbowpyramid
Keep
Keep Pretty. Shows our support for the homosexual community. That's right. There is only one homosexual community. It's called... CANADA! Or was it Australia? No... It was China. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 22:39, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Useless template. --Docile hippopotamus 10:01, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Horrifying eyesore that I hate. pillow talk 22:37, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Seeks to achieve an animation. This template was blanked by a vandal four months ago and no one has noticed. It now contains only the {VFD} tag, which is faithfully copied into the few pages that invoke the template. Spıke¬ 11:01 2-Nov-09
Understood, though Syndrome got to it first. Indeed I was and am reluctant to replace an article with a historical version while a vote is active. Spıke¬ 12:36 3-Nov-09
MrN9000 would tell you that it's a requirement to do so. See rule 2.1 in The Uncyclopedian Rulebook Part IV: Them List of Rules at the Top of the VFD Page. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 00:22, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
I see it; but "you" in rule 2 would be the nominator (Docile Hippopotamus), to whom I wrote the above note--comparable to the one you wrote to him (above, and with a more specific fix) in the case of Template:SmoothRainbow. Spıke¬ 01:29 4-Nov-09
Comment. Dexter deserves to be raped in the face. That is all. pillow talk 23:14, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Comment. I can arrange that. MrNFork you! 22:44, Nov 6
Yawn 
Suryavarman II
Keep. (Was Comment) As of the end of October, this article was an infobox, sections of one or two sentences apiece, and interminable lists. Pelargonium made it a real article, and the only problem I have with it is that the "excitable fanboy" tone of voice....PS--Now I get it--that is the humor--medieval Khmer ruler vs fanboy with a new power game card. Again my problem with alternate narrating voices. Given this, it's within range of being decent. 
Comment. Shit, That's better then what I could come up with about The Quaker Oats guy. I would have just gone with Redirect->
EXTERMINATE!
Smite. Here's the summary: Boring paragraph, random paragraph, boring paragraph, giant list, giant unfunny quote collection. --
Keep Per Guildy 
