Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive18

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion
Revision as of 22:44, April 26, 2011 by Fnoodle (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Raven

Delete. It's been a one-sentence stub since May, burn it. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

Falerin

Moved to User:Falerin. He can do what he likes with it. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 21:18, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete Not only am I not Uncyclopedic... I cannot even make sense of this crap Falerin 20:42, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Inane Comment I have edited the article since it bears my nom de plume. Now its not only crap it's drivel as well. Falerin 21:06, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete Yep, burninate. --Toilet24 20:45, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Do not delete I think it's rather handy, and you're very uncyclopedic. - 06/12/2005/ZLOK

The Fart of War

Nuke: crappy stub. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 22:36, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

author This is supposed to go with Making up Sun-Tzu quotes and be a parody retelling of The Art of War --Nerd42 22:39, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Looking at it again, I think I'd mostly forgotten to work on it ... give me a little time and I'll actually write an actual article that will be reasonably decent. You're right, it does suck right now, and if I hadn't written it I'd have QVFD'd it not VFD'd it. --Nerd42 22:41, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ah, tis much better now, take a look, and it will continue to expand until it spoofs all 13 chapters of The Art of War --Nerd42 23:30, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

sorry for posting so many times, but I just wanted to say Thank you for bringing my extreme neglect of this project to my attention. --Nerd42 23:32, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'll warn you, I am rewriting Sun-Tzu because it's not any good right now. I like The Fart of War a little more now, so I'll make sure to put a link in the rewrite somewhere. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 00:47, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

OK, that's cool. I'm taking The Fart of War off VFD then. :) --Nerd42 19:41, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Operation iraqi freedom

Not only is this not that funny, but it's also redundant due to Gulf War (video game).--Jsonitsac 19:38, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. It's just not funny at all. Not like the WWI one. That was funny. I mean, except for all the mustard gas and stuff. That sucked. carl 22:13, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Weak Keep the Zero Wing reference is funny --Nerd42 22:26, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Keep The description of the end part seems eerily accurate. ComaVN 22:29, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Rewrite for better humor --Infobacker 14:17, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep because everytime you delete an entry, God kills a kitten --Getukrainian 17:50, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete We've got too many of these 'war video game' articles already; I don't see any need to go doubling up. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:21, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Zirgas_galvas

(Delete) Makes sense not, makes laughter not.--47Monkey MUN HMRFRA s7fc | Talk 09:01, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete the unfunny. ComaVN 11:33, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Delete ----Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:50, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Delete Begone with this foulness!--Putz 00:17, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Bionicle

Gibberish. --Andrusi 19:41, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Guy had to be drunk, right? Delete --Johnny C. Raven 05:46, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Main Page.

Crap. --Ianweller 22:58, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Huffed twice for good measure. --Splaka 23:21, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Star Wreck

Somebody put this up for VFD. I wrote the article, forgot about it later, and yeah, it's not going to happen. Go ahead and delete it. --Nerd42 15:47, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Baleeted. Strong RadX 15:51, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Dolly llama

Simply not funny. What more can I say? --Putz 08:24, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Reasons not to be a devout Christian

Send to Hell It's not funny. Just more blatant anti-religion because being anti-religious is popular right now. I didn't QVFD it though because it looks like it's had quite a few edits. --Nerd42 14:56, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep There is no NPOV requirement on this site. --Carlb 15:07, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
....which is why I said in the first sentence, "it's not funny" --Nerd42 15:09, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep It's not extremely funny or anything, but it's not "ghgheheheheh Jesus sucks" either. The line "The big questions in life, such as Why are we here? and What happens when we die? are all answered, which takes a bit of the mystery out of existence." gave me a chuckle at least.
Keep Not all that funny, but better than some pages I've seen not up for deletion. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 16:02, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep Yeah... if we were a wiki documenting 'truth', thish would have to stay in it's present form. However, Uncyclopedia focusses on HUMOUR (and humor too, if I remember correctly). The article has potential for some incredibly wacky stuff. Some of what is in there now is quite witty. Just delete the stuff that's so true it isn't funny and throw in a couple of Flying Spaghetti Monster references and make it known that God watches believers mastrubate. And stuff like that. --King Nintendoid 16:47, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
OK, so heavy duty rewrite I think most of it reads exactly like a "ghgheheheheh Jesus sucks"fest, and your calling this truth suggests to me that this is becoming not a wiki documentnig HUMOR but a wiki documenting anti-morality HUMOR and that's not something I'd want to stay associated with. General HUMOR that's funny to as many people as possible is what I'd like to see around here. --Nerd42 18:43, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
"Anti-morality HUMOR"
I sense bias. Look, if you're gonna go that road, you may as well hand out with Senor Douchebag del Tourette's syndrome. I agree that there's room for witty wackiness, but if the major reason why you have a problem with this is because it's perceivable as "immoral," then you're barking up the wrong tree.

Keep If only to give a resounding "Fuck you" to the American Religious Majority. Unconventioanlity can be very humorous.--Sir Flammable KUN 18:48, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete Though this article is funny, the bottom line is that it is offensive. If we are going to be politically correct (which is, after all, one of the goals of this site), then we can't have offensive articles like this lying around. We wouldn't want someone to come to Uncyclopedia, read an article, become offended and leave, would we? Since the votes so far are unanimously delete, I have gone ahead and deleted the article, as well as all the articles linked to and from it. --Sarcastic Paulgb 19:40, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Who said Uncyclopedia was supposed to be politically correct? 'Keep and VFH. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:26, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Nerd42's Crash Course in Religious/Political Humor

Not Funny

(from Reasons not to be a devout Christian)

  • You're not allowed to have sex before marriage.
  • You're not allowed to enjoy sex within marriage.
  • You're only allowed sex to procreate - which means no more sex after your last kid is born.
  • That "no premarital sex" thing makes it difficult to empathize with those who get STD's, pregnancy out of wedlock, etc.

Funny

Just thought that'd clarify things a bit --Nerd42 20:52, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

And one more thing.
If only to give a resounding "Fuck you" to the American Religious Majority.

As has been mentioned before, that's not the stated purpose of ths site. And I thought Christians were intolerant lol. --Nerd42 20:56, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Oh hush. You're protesting becuase it annoys you. If you want real reasons from me, it's because those statements are, in fact amusing because of their truth/criticality. The list is very "Onion"-esque and ridicules Christianity (which, if you noticed, since we ARE parodying wikipedia, non-NPOV humor is perfectly fine). If you want "moral" humor, go read "Ziggy," I'm sure that's certainly within your depth of character.--Sir Flammable KUN 21:23, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Face it, this one's a keeper. And I'm counting Paul's vote as a Keep because he's being sarcastic. Stop trying to squeeze a victory out of a complete loss, unless you want us to hate you for making a big deal out of nothing, a la Tourette's--Sir Flammable KUN 21:23, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep, it has good stuffs that aren't worth deleting, eg "Wanting to have the word "hello" banned because it has "hell" in it.". If you are overly offended, we can always make you Reasons not to be a devout Christian/Lite --Splaka 22:00, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Didn't say I wanted "moral" humor, or didn't want "immoral humor" but that I think an overdose of anti-moral so-called "humor" isn't "humor" and is just stupid. I'm not saying it's hurtful or people will be offended. If you've read some of my stuff (posted here and elsewhere) you'll know I'm not very concerned with offending people, or with what other people think about me. And, as I understood it, the guidelines say "Bias is not a replacement for humor" which I think is/was happening in this case.

However, now that I've been thinking about it more, I must admit there is some funny material there, and with some heavy editing (I don't nessicarily mean censoring - just deleteing stupid retarded crap like that which I posted above because it's stupid retarded crap) it might become an almost-decent article, or at least better than some I can think of. --Nerd42 22:07, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

If you pay attention, most of it is not simply bias for the sake of bias. Much of what you tried to remove is political commentary (i.e. the religiousness and inherent hypocrisy of using Christianity to justify American actions), and is perfectly suitable for this site.--Sir Flammable KUN 22:18, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Just two points, ok: 1) I'm a Christian and 2) The article is funny. Especially "Maintaining your devout Christian faith while contributing to the Reasons not to be a devout Christian page at Uncyclopedia." And as for heavy editing... well, the entries in the "Not Funny" section of Nerd42's previous posting strikes me as especially funny, because I know people who think that way, God bless 'em. My vote: Keep. -- <s>Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 22:18, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • PS: I'm sure that if God had an issue with my Uncylopedia contributions, He'd let m$54 Q#)%*SDF W#$(U% NO CARRIER
Has it occured to you that he already has, and you weren't listening? lol anyways, oddly enough, Flammable reverted my edits, which included the removal of the VFD tag. So as of now, Flammable has put this up for VFD, not me. I'm starting Reasons to become an atheist for some balance. --Nerd42 22:44, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps you shouldn't torch your own house down as you throw stones. (LOL B&)--Sir Flammable KUN 23:39, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete Not funny/uninformative. --Overlordzoloft 02:16, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)</s>

Vote closed by overwhelming "Keep"--Sir Flammable KUN 03:39, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

As a side note, I've started Reasons to become an atheist so we all can just get along. :) --Nerd42 00:26, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Vincent Sin

Non notable, seems vanity-ish/injoke-ish/limited audience-ish. --Splaka 09:59, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

-- REPLY - I think not. This is a common tale of a mirculous man. Thankyou for pissing away my 3 hours of hardwork on that article.

Delete So notable, there isn't a single webpage about the guy apart from his own. SlainAngel 10:17, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete Only my own vanity is important in this world. ComaVN 12:17, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete severely. If Splaka hadn't gone soft and put it here first, I'd have deleted the page and given User:Feeldix the banninnation of his life (which, judging from the article, is between 12 and 14 years long). I may still do it. Geez, that's a crappy article. I want those 2 minutes of my life back. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 22:23, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Diarrhoea

Now that the american version Diarrhea is gone, what to do with this pile of liquid crap? --Splaka 04:55, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Baleet. Strong RadX 04:58, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • This same text was already voted on in the US-language version, why vote again? Flush twice it's a long way to the kitchen. --Carlb 08:07, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Baleeted. Strong RadX 16:11, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC) </s>

Both versions put on CVP until someone can suggest something better. --Splaka 04:34, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Wife breeding

Blah blah blah blah; Delete. --DWIII 23:57, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete--Spintherism 01:15, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Wake 'n Bake

I like it but I already put it in Undictionary, where it belongs. Has had MTU tag for almost a month now.--Naughtyned 19:43, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Nyrhinen

I guess this has something to do with Finland, but I don't get it. --Ruubio 15:26, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Interstellar travel

Nike. It's hardly even undictionary material. Acid Ammo 22:15, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kill--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:22, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Overlordzoloft 02:29, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Dane Floyd

Over and done with --—rc (t) 07:34, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Non-notable, no en.wp page, few dozen google hits, if it is a made up person it still seems humorous only to a small group. --Splaka 10:14, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

lol hilarious, i am part of tht small group of people coz i know who its talking about, keep it (For)

HAHAHA this is the funniest page i have seen in ages. I dont know the guy but from what i hear this guy must be sooo stupid. Bravo to the people who have made it. (For)

How dare you even consider deleting this page, i have no idea who this dane floyd is, but reading this entry in the uncyclopedia made my day, i laughed for hours. it made me want to meet this dane floyd guy and keep him safe in my house. please, for the sake of this poor old man's heart, do not delete this page. it is the only place on the web i can go to find some true humour, praise the authors! (For)

OMG This page is so awesome i laughed so hard i nearly pissed my pants keep it up kthnx, keeewl. (For)

Yes, I do admit (as a creator of this page) it is an in-joke. But it serves a purpose. It demonstrates the lies we tell to do stuff and I can't keep writing like this forever damn you English!!!! Let's keep it, for the good of our nation and your wellbeing. Oh yeah, I made everyone else's votes above clear. For

Delete Let's see, rapid-fire anonymous votes to keep a non-notable vanity page...I don't think it's happening, guys. --—rc (t) 07:02, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Fine, at least let me have the dignity of taking it down myself.

Category:Things featured in "America, Fuck Yeah!"

Yes, those quotes are actually there in the category name. It's got just enough edits by non-ignorable users that I hesitated before deleting it. Only references are, surprisingly enough, America and Fuck. Opinions? -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 19:08, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Non-notable country, it supposedly exists but looks pretty small on the map next to Russia and Canada. Besides, articles really don't belong in category namespace and this one isn't even particularly funny. Delete. --Carlb 01:19, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Baleet it. Strong RadX 03:21, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I added links because I thought it was a funny concept. It probably is too long to be a category and since it is entirely plagarized (I think) it probably shouldn't be an article. I'll miss it though. For those who don't know it's the theme song to Team America World Police. It's much funnier if you've seen the movie.--Naughtyned 05:54, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I think you're getting the cause and effect of your statistics all befuddled. The correlation between people who've seen Team America World Police and people who think that page is funny is not due to any synergistic relationship between the two, but can be explained much more easily in that people who sat through Team America World Police think some really stupid shit is funny.--Spintherism 06:04, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
All uncyclopedians think stupid shit is funny we just can't agree on which stupid shit. --Naughtyned 15:46, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

BobBobBob Re: Your suggestions on my talk page, I have copied the WikiMedia behind this page to a text file, so if you want to delete it go ahead. I can easily supply the contents of this page to anyone who wants to use it in an article.--Naughtyned 21:54, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Your wish is my command, for sufficiently small values of "command". I've also removed the two references to the category (one of which required me to watch the screen with one eye and the cubicle door with the other, lest the boss write me up, again). Note: you don't have to clutter up your computer with text files -- that's what your user space is for! Right? Well, don't go backing up your .mp3 collection, but I think it would be fine to put the content in User:Naughtyned/AFY for safekeeping. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 22:27, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip Bob. I didn't know how to access my storage page before. I'm still a N00b in many ways.--Naughtyned 13:49, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
n00b? Watch out, they'll make you admin. :) There's nothing special about the letters "AFY" -- it's just the initials of the category in question. I could have just as easily created a link to something like User:Naughtyned/I swear, I'm fucking going to kill Naughtyned! and Wiki will treat it just like any other link to a non-existent page -- it'll let you create it. There's probably some better way, but I haven't found it -- which doesn't mean anything (click the "ignr'nt" link in my sig for details). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 16:31, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Phangle

An unfunny article with no history made by people who couldn't be bothered to read the editing help page. I'd have gone unilateral on they asses, but I'm a n00b myself, so I thought I'd get a concensus vote on this one. --Putz 07:59, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Actually, there's nothing you could do except blank the page, which might have gotten you banned even though the page sucks. You have to win the Admin Lotto to be able to take unilateral action against WMDs (Weakassed Mediocre uncyclopeDia-entries). By the way, I vote to Delete (and if I get bored, I'll do it myself, because I did win the lotto!). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 18:51, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)
    • Reformatted and rewritten a bit; some potential here. Weakly keep. --DWIII 03:23, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
      • The reformat/rewrite of DWIII's makes it much less vain and moronic than I ever thought it could be, so I, uhh, change my vote. And stuff. (Can I do that??) And to BobBobBob: thanks for the friendly warning; I'd hate to get banned from this amazing site so soon after discovering it. (Note to self: Don't delete crap; tell others to delete crap.) Thanks! --Putz 06:38, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
        • oooops. Baleeted, with apologies to the fine kids at Eden Prairie High School, Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Not much to do in between "too cold to go outside" and "cold enough to fall through the ice", is there? Nice effort, though. You could always ask another admin to undelete it, but my trigger finger was getting a bit itchy. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 21:28, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Chicken Fries

Delete Unfunny, completely non-clever, a rant more than anything -Drdisque 06:39, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

West Island School

Completely serious/factual. I'd QVFD but it's so long, has been around awhile, and been edited a number of times (but by same user). Quick kill votes would be appreciated,unless someone wants to completely rework it into nonsense? -- T. (talk) 19:42, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Diarrhea

Nuke: Ooh, poopy jokes, great! Not actually funny. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:54, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

anonymous There, i fixed the bad stuff. It's good now.
It still stinks. Crap. --Carlb 23:21, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep In case you didn't notice the current featured article is mostly poopy jokes.--Naughtyned 05:53, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Is that why you linked this VFD'd page to its text? -- T. (talk) 15:51, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
It makes sense that they should be linked doesn't it? BTW, I linked them before I saw that this had VFD tag.--Naughtyned 15:55, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
So at least according to vote, Fecal E.Coli is actually a good article. Yes, it's a poopy joke, but without the threesomes, homo jokes, blood, and anal sex. I've read diarrhea a few times now through different revisions, and agree with carlb. -- T. (talk) 16:24, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete -- T. (talk) 16:24, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete — I suspect there's some potential here, but it's just a monolithic shit joke. Maybe if the shit-jokery were a smaller portion of the article... — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 18:33, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

So add what you think belongs to whatever part of the shit jokery you find worth saving.--Naughtyned 20:45, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Flushed.

Disambiguated the rest of this stupid shit.

Armenian Mom!

Excessively red, berift of humor. Delete. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 22:53, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

deete--Spintherism 06:17, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

If I were Bill S. Preston, Esquire, I would say "Whoaa, dude. This article is totally non-non-heinous. You should, like, delete this before I totally blow chunks all over Ted." Of course, I actually am Bill, so, like, uhh, what I said. [starts playing air guitar] Exellent! --Putz 06:50, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Template:Vandalofenemy

Keep, I would love to hand this award out to the people who use the HowTo:Vandalise Wikipedia guide--Foo21(talk)-(edits)-(block) 16:07, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I change my vote to Weak keep for humorous purposes only and not as an award (Per VD talk)--Foo21(talk)-(edits)-(block) 19:32, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hans Moleman

The article is 2 lines long, doesn't link to anything and isn't really that funny. And in case you aren't a Simpsons fan, this is Hans Moleman: http://www.thesimpsonsquotes.com/characters/hans-moleman-quotes.html Could be funny with a re-write, but way too short as it is. --ENeGMA 02:49, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Lake Forest High School

Vanity page given a LOT of time. Needs to go--Foo21(talk)-(edits)-(block) 21:03, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bisected

Maybe it's undictionary worthy, but I don't think it's funny enough even for that. Acid Ammo 02:05, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

A past-tense verb for a title does not an Uncyclopedia article make (and is even unworthy for (gasp!) Undictionary). Delete. --DWIII 03:24, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Darius&Girenas

Found it at random. At first it looked like instahuff (I especially dislike inline external images), but the history shows that it keeps picking up edits. Is this an inside joke for our Lithuanian friends? If so, I guess it's a keeper -- but it should be moved to Darius & Girenas for consistency. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 17:26, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

That fucker who scammed me last week

This article makes me feel like I'm sitting next to its author in a bar, and he's had a few too many but is not yet drunk enough to be amusing. --Brett Bretterson 06:11, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • I almost deleted it when it was created, but I liked the link from Lying. Weak keep, but I could easily be talked out of it. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 17:22, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Beavis

Sucks. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

Delete- I didn't like it!- ----Alfred 01:55, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC) 01:49, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

WoW

We can do better. --neoEva88 20:05, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete or redirect to World of Warcraft (that's what it stands for, right?)

--Paulgb 20:52, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC) --Ueland 17:10, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Bobby-Sue, fetch my shotgun, it's killin' time... Karma Llama 01:25, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep: It's been turned into a redirect to World of Whorecraft, which ate World of Warcraft. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 22:50, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pornographic magazine

Pointless. Really. Porn deserves better. -- T. (talk) 02:08, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete I can't tell if its bad or just a really poor attempt at british humor. --Staxeon 08:52, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Seriously: How can you tell the diffrence?
Delete I'm British, and let me tell you, it's bad. Juan Kerr 19:39, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete: Could be used for much better. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 00:39, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - it's been done better before (we had one about magazines as gun clips, complete with 'clip joints' and 'firing blanks' around here somewhere, redirect this there?) --Carlb 03:44, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Discarded like a soggy tissue. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:30, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ring-wraiths

The content itself has potential, but it would be less effort for someone to make a completely new Ring-Wraith than try to rescue this partially aborted page. --Moosemanmoo 22:07, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Foot and Mouth

A mess and quite short. Quite possibly [b]anti-funny[/b] if you're over the age of 9. --Moosemanmoo 22:07, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Punch It. Then punch it again. Karma Llama 01:36, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Nuke: Pathetic mess. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 00:46, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Tony Hawks

Three lines, not funny.--Sweet Indigo 20:52, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Flagged for rewrite. --DWIII 04:16, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Nuke: Short and unfunny. With a name like that, it should be about a bird. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 00:46, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Espoo language now Espoo

Not in any way funny. It's a collection of random statements about a language named after an obscure Finnish town. As honorable as it is to mock the Finns at every possible opportunity, this page just lacks any cohesion or readily-accessible humor. --Dschinghis 3:28, 8 Nov 2005 (EST)

Delete, I live next to Espoo and don't find anything amusing in this. --Ruubio 14:22, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete: It's not funny. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 00:52, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Also, these related articles go with it (and nothing else): Espoo and Children of Bodom. Kill them all, and let God kill them again. (if someone else doesn't, I may do it myself the next time I get bored) -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 18:52, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete Espoo language, but the voter above might want to try actually reading the Children of Bodom article, which was written completely separately from the Espoo language page and was only linked to it later (links for the COB page haven't been added yet) --Crilldogg 08:31, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I deleted Espoo language and moved its content (if you can call it that) to the extra-stubby Espoo article. I'll withdraw my objection to Children of Bodom if you say so. But now the real question:

The continental US except for Hawaii because you can't play baseball if you are hawaiin or however it is spelt. Alaska can though

I almost used my Godlike admin powers for the first time to delete this article. If I'd caught it when it was born, I could have -- it was a one-line stupidity. But User:LeeHarveyKennedy added mucho content and made it funny... but not funny enough to overcome the f'upid (fucking stupid) title. I posted a note to LHK suggesting he merge the content into Hawaii and let us know here when the original, overly-titled article is ready to be sent to Soul Society (obscure anime reference, you wouldn't understand). If he doesn't do it, I or someone else will -- but I wanted to try out my new "giving advice to others as though I'm not a n00b myself" mode. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 22:53, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep No, don't delete it. Move it to Why You Can't Play Baseball in Hawaii or something --Nerd42 23:02, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Moved page "The continental US except for Hawaii because you can't play baseball if you are hawaiin or however it is spelt. Alaska can though" to "USA except Hawaii because you can't play baseball". --Carlb 23:13, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Move it again, this time to a page that actually makes sense. I think it's a good article, definitely worth keeping. Maybe just, "Hawaii can't place baseball" or something like that. --neoEva88 03:29, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Moved, as per Nerd42's suggestion, to Why you can't play baseball in Hawaii. --Algorithm 01:56, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Removed the VFD tag. The only problem people seemed to have was the inordinately long title. Now that the problem has been remedied, I believe the VFD tag is unnecessary. --neoEva88 20:21, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Boy, a lot goes down when you don't have a computer. Sorry I couldn't voice my opinion on this, but it looks like it all got handled well. Thanks for the compliment, B3. I did what I could, but yeah, glad you guys thought the title sucked ass, too. --Lee

Alright, since the article itself seems to touch you guys somewhere I don't want to know about, I've adjusted the link in Baseball to point to Why you can't play baseball in Hawaii, and deleted the redirect. I'll just wait to delete the article when nobody is looking, that'll show 'em. Wait, did I say that out loud? Crap. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:54, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Jesii Project: Phase One

See my initial discussion on cleaning up the Jesii here: Template Talk:Jesii

I think the following random Jesii pages are terrible and should be deleted because of not-funniness and the glut of Jesii:

Consider 'em on a case by case basis, though. --Sarducci 20:49, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete 'em all Ah, I do so love projects like this. --—rc (t) 23:11, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Delete Jesus 2.0, FrankenJesus, Cowboy jesus, Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, the last might have a future... --Splaka 23:19, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Comment Perhaps they can be merged and added to one of the Jesii pages as "Known imposters of Jesus" ? MadMax 02:44, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
If they don't suck, they deserve their own pages. If they do, delete! I'd be willing to accept Splatka's suggestion of leaving PNJ alive but rewrite-tagged.--Sarducci 12:09, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • Ah but they suck why pass up the chance for redicule ? MadMax 21:18, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Save Yeah but the Mormons believe in more than one Jesus, don't they? Wouldn't deleting Jesus entries be a violation of their civil rights? I think in the book of Mormon it talked about there being many incarnations of Jesus on the planet at the same time or something. If anything, merge the Pirate Ninja Jesus to one of the Pirate Ninja pages or something, or add it for the talk like a pirate day or something. --Loke 22:39, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
  • No, Mormons don't believe in more than one Jesus and The Book of Mormon doesn't mention more than one Jesus on Earth at the same time. In case there was any confusion. --neoEva88 22:46, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Thanks for clearing that up. I must have read that in a different version of the bible. Hard to tell them all apart. Maybe reading all the Jesii articles has confused me a bit? --Loke 20:24, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
So with three vfd and one qualified save, can cowboy and franken jesus go? --Sarducci 16:02, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
FYI: The Book of Mormon does not say there were multiple re-incarnations of Jesus. The LDS Mormon church probably does though ... --Nerd42 20:24, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for that fact. I thought I read or heard it from somewhere that somebody or some group or some bible said that Jesus can take on multiple forms. Maybe he can form his own musical band or baseball team? Anyone want to write an article about Jesii themed music bands or baseball teams? Now playing on the drums Jesus, on the horn Jesus, on the guitar Jesus, on the cowbell Jesus. Now playing first base Jesus, second base Jesus, third base Jesus, etc. :) --Loke 20:24, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
perhaps you could help me out with my Blah series --Nerd42 04:33, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Media:Who Rules America.pdf

  • Delete. Useless "the jews run the media" spam. --Carlb 22:23, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)
    • Baleeted. Uncyclopedia Is Not Your Personal Remote File Storage Area. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:39, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

New Zanzibar

Effectively a duplicate of New Zealand, with no additional merit. --Gadgeophile 01:54, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Gaah. Even the image name was search-and-replaced. No notable edits adding new content, so I made it a redirect. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 22:28, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

2665

It's a bit too long for unilateral huffage, but still crap. --Spintherism 22:34, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

This is a list of what the author doesnt like, from the way its worded. Immediate huffication with extreme prejudice--Nytrospawn 23:59, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Contrary to what it may look like I like most of the stuff I put in there. It alredy has the editme template, so feel free to "neutralize" its point of view or change it as you like, but I think deletion for this article is a bit harsh. Acid Ammo 00:07, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Pointless, unfunny, smells of fish, has 2 noses. Enough about me, the article's bollocks. SegwayVader has spoken, DIE BITCH DIE. Karma Llama 01:48, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I like the reason for the counting crows ban, but I don't like the reason for the rest of the article. Deletezorz. Distorto November 16, 2005

Keep: I reformatted it a little to make it less hate inspiring. I'd say that it just needs a lot of work now, instead of being huffworthy. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 22:45, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep: Although it is 'Bat Fuck Insane' at least it's interesting. The title sucks though, perhaps you could move it to a page that enhances the humor, like "Because Your Mom Is A Crack Whore" or "Because Because" Wiki Tiki God 07:18, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • It has a certian childish charm to it. And since I'm childish, I say Keep with a liberal dose of rewrite. --Putz 07:09, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Cleavage

Now I appreciate gratuitous boobies as much as anybody here, but really... Delete --DWIII 02:46, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep; need I speak as to why? Nay, sirs; nay. As for the "gentle-...man..." that voted for delete, I vote you delete your man breasts in favor of those that belong to a fine young harlot. Huzzah. user:BlackMage!! 11:39 PM, November 13th, 2005

Keep - I will make it my personal mission to rewrite this "article" just to save this area of outstanding natural beauty. For Sophia -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)

Keep as rewritten - The original was listed here as it had images but no text, an article has since been written around this. --Carlb 17:57, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep as rewritten. Look a .GIF whore in the mouth. Brilliant!--Putz 07:14, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Peppermint Patty

Um, I'd like to point out that work-based surfers (like me) might not want to click right away... NSFW & all... -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 23:30, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Didn't find it funny, at all, was short, random and somewhat based on the actual plot of the comic (And most likely stolen from Family Guy). Beleet. --ENeGMA 03:16, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Perhaps not funny, definitely short, not at all random, definitely somewhat based on the actual plot of the comic as it is an attempt to be satirical and is a gesture at deconstructing Schultz's work, and not at all stolen from Family Guy, since I have never seen the show. Keep --Curious Larry 09:41, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep It's not a bad little article, it just needs a little love! I hope someone does come along to make it longer and funnier but in the mean time, hopefully the picture I added will save it from deletion. Naughtyned 16:01, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

With the addition of the picture, perhaps I'll reconsider my hasty decision.  :) --ENeGMA 23:46, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Expand or Delete: It's pretty short and not that funny. The picture doesn't make it a good article, just a mediocre article with a pretty girl. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 22:22, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep (for now) It needs some work but is ok for now. The picture makes me happy in my pants, but does not make me happy in my heart. One good Photoshop picture could make this article shine. Wiki Tiki God 07:27, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)


How many "Keep" votes does this need to get the VFD tag removed? I think Curious Larry has added some great content. If that's not enough, I think we could get even more good content by putting this on Pee Review. As for the picture it follows a theme started on the Snoop Dogg page. After I put an edited picture of Snoopy that conflates Snoopy with Snoop Dogg, Mrasdfghjkl added a picture of the real Snoop Dogg with two women kissing, one of whom I believe is Paris Hilton and the other whom I don't know, but would sure like to! Mrasdfghjkl made the caption on this photo "Snoop Dogg doin' his thang", to whiich I added "wid his hos, Peppermint Patty and Marcy." So even though the woman in the Peppermint Patty article photo is clearly not one of the two in the Snoop Dogg photo, I am sure you can see the common theme. That said, I would be willing to edit this phot or replace it with a totally different one if someone has a better idea. --Naughtyned 23:08, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Go for it, dude. Tying in Snoop Dog is a natural...--Curious Larry 00:12, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Tourette's Syndrome

Highly insulting towards TS sufferers including myself. This article was deleted before but the author just put it back up again. --DrPoodle 23:11, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Actually, the article was never deleted. You already lost the argument at the talk page, give it up. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 02:45, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC) --> The page was blanked by a mod so basically it was deleted. --DrPoodle 22:58, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Um, where was it blanked by a mod??? --Carlb 04:32, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Delete Not because it's offensive (I wouldn't have you thinking I'm sensitive or anything) but because it's lacking any originality whatsoever. It's like the horribly prevalent ADHD joke "[throwaway text] - hey, let's ride bikes!" If I never see it again it will be too soon.
I'm not sorry if I've offended anyone with this vote. --—rc (t) 04:35, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep The article itself isn't very funny at all but I think the talk page is hilarious. Juan Kerr 12:08, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Comment Attempted partial rewrite to be the words of someone swearing at Uncyclopedia's authors for accusing them of swearing all the time, added {{SeeTalk}} and link to the real {{Wikipedia}} article up top. Now it's a mess of templates. :(
An article by this name was deleted once after being overwritten by User:DrPoodle with a "how dare you make fun of this" rant or utter rubbish a few times (user was warned, see User_talk:DrPoodle, and the text moved to the talk page). And yes, Adrian==DrPoodle, according to deleted article history, which was:
   * 20:23, 9 Oct 2005 Famine deleted "Tourette's Syndrome" (VFD'd)
Page history:
   * 16:36, 4 Oct 2005 . . DrPoodle ()
   * 16:27, 4 Oct 2005 . . DrPoodle (Re-write of insulting article)
   * 04:40, 2 Oct 2005 . . DWIII ({{wikipedia}} for actual info)
   * 11:21, 30 Sep 2005 . . 140.211.82.4 (...and reverted to previous version by Capt. Barnacle)
   * 10:47, 30 Sep 2005 . . DrPoodle ()
   * 10:43, 30 Sep 2005 . . DrPoodle ()
   * 10:39, 30 Sep 2005 . . DrPoodle ()
   * 18:59, 26 Sep 2005 . . CaptainBarnacle (OOPS your edit accidentally wasn't funny)
   * 15:45, 25 Sep 2005 . . DrPoodle ()
   * 22:19, 12 Sep 2005 . . DWIII (linkified & categorized)
   * 18:25, 12 Sep 2005 . . 82.25.35.168 ()
   * 07:19, 28 Aug 2005 . . Daocrat (WHERE IS MY HAIRPIECE?!!)

--Carlb 04:16, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Who doesn't get speared and insulted on this site? Keep. -- T. (talk) 04:46, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep; if you can't take a joke, go to fucking wikipedia. And cry, while you're at it. Oops, I wasn't nice. My mistake. Must be my uber-turrets. User:BlackMage 04:46 AM, 13 Nov 2005 (EST)

Keep? Taking this one step further, I vote to undelete the entire previous history of this article, on the grounds that the previous article, however lame, was likely deleted in error. From Uncyclopedia:Pages_for_deletion/archive14#Tourette's_Syndrome, there was only one vote to delete and the rest were to rewrite: --Carlb 17:26, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

From the original VFD (now closed) on the previous article by this name:

This article is NOT funny and is in fact very insulting towards me and other people with Tourette's Syndrome. 
I have asked the creator to  change it but he just deleted my plea and so I am putting it up for deletion. 
-DrPoodle 03:45 30 Sep 2005

Rewrite (only slightly funny) also, please put back the version that upset you so we can make a judgement on it,
rather than your message that is there now. Thank you. 
--Sir Splaka KUN UotM NotM Bur. VFP SG CM +S © (talk) 11:00, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I am re-writing it at the moment. should be finished in a few days!

Rewrite it has potential (with some tweaking), and if anyone is offended by it, I don't care.
-- Jordon Sometime Around Noon, Oct 6, 2005
Keep, the latest rewrite is very amusing. --Caiman 17:59, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Keep I love Carlbs changes to it. --Paulgb 18:17, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Got to be Keep for me. I have every sympathy for sufferers, I know someone who has Tourettes, but THIS is what Uncyclopedia is all about. 50% of Uncyclopedia is insulting to someone (or at least in very bad taste), I'd sooner see something like this here, where it belongs, that out there in the real world. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Keep and keep the VFD tag that Carlb made up on it. That ices the cake. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 02:41, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)


And now someone has put my plea as the main article and covered it with swearwords. That is not funny. I wrote that plea to try and get the author to look deep inside himself and think about all the people he would be insulting over something they cannot control, and that is the petty response I get? I vote this article should be reverted to the one I wrote, which was funny and didn't insult anyone. Thanks to Mhaille for his comment "I have every sympathy for sufferers", but your other point is wrong. This stuff IS in the real world, and it is the internet and other types of distribution that is corrupting people's views. --86.141.88.50 16:22, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)


Comment You say you had text "which was funny"? During the previous vote, you'd replaced the whole article with:

"Tourette's Syndrome" is the singular term for "Tourette's Syndromi" which are deadly super bacteria that are unique in the fact that they only affect other bacteria. A Tourette's Syndromi (named after discoverer John Tourette) is about 10 namometres wide, and lurks in washing-up detergents and soaps. It kills any bacteria it somes into contact with by releasing anti-bacterial bacterio that attack its outer shell and eventually rip the bacteria to shreds. Although scientists believe otherwise, Tourette's Syndrome are the only factor in soap products that gets rid of bacteria. A bacterio, is quite simply, a "foot soldier" in the whole range of bacteria hierachy. It is small and weak, often only living several weeks, but when in a squad with other bacterio, the whole unit (called bacteriom) stregth is fenominal and can easily kill off several million bacteria a day. Bacterio, although efficient at killing in squads, are miserably slow, and require the help of a Tourette Syndromi to help transport them around the bacteria battleground. In short, if bacterio are foot soldiers, Tourette Syndrome are the equivilant of a Battle Tank....

*yawn* --Carlb 17:09, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep The link to the wikipedia article is good enough to clear up misconceptions without ruining the article --Willy on wheels! 23:28, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Neutral Personally I don't think it's that funny, and I agree that is objectionable. But when you showed it to the Vice-Chairman of the Tourettes Association, I am absolutely sure she would be appalled. That is not the point. This is a parody site. If you like, you can include a larger link to the Wikipedia article with a warning or something, but removal for the sake of conservative censorship is not what I will support. Adjusting people's thinking is one thing, censoring what you don't like is another, regardless of whether it is offensive or not. --Sophia 06:33, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Fine, but I object to the fact that my words have been used as the main body of the text. Please can u revert the article to the one in the first place and not have my plea turned into a sick twisted parody. --DrPoodle 19:31, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Technically, every word you commit to any page of Uncyclopedia becomes fair game, under whatever-the-heck license is granted. In fact, I remember reading something to the effect of "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here." Where did I see that? Oh, yeah, it's right in front of me at the bottom of the Edit page! In other words, if you don't want your deep emotions turned into a "sick twisted parody", you might not be playing in the right sandbox. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 19:44, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
I would agree - this isn't a site where poor suffering souls turn to kindered spirits with which to share tender moments - it's a hostile, arrogant, bitterly satirical website dedicated to insults, lies, slander, and disinformation. If you don't want to contribute to such a site, there's always the Encyclopædia Dramatica, where such people gather. If you add content to this website, it's going to be twisted, edited, and used for evil. Or humor. But regardless, by clicking "save page" you agreed to the bottom-text which stated:
Please note that all contributions to Uncyclopedia are considered to be released under the Creative Commons SA License (see Project:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here.
We aren't trying to pick on someone who suffers from a terrible condition - we're picking on those hypocrites who come to this website, contribute to and/or laugh at insulting/slanderous/lying pages, and then complain about their poor sensitivity when a page hits a little too close to home. If you're a thin-skinned whiny little bitch, don't come here. Don't read the pages here, and don't contribute to the site. If you do come here, understand that everyone and everything gets ripped on, and if someone has escaped so far, it's just because we haven't gotten to them yet. We're not picking on Tourette's sufferers specifically - they are just a subset of "everyone", who is our actual target. There are no exceptions. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 23:17, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep: It's in poor taste, but it's pretty funny poor taste. I added Template:Fro to keep the whiney babies happy. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:29, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delete:Why? The article is pretty funny but I dont want some multi-million dollar TS organizaton shutting us down. I'm archiving the talk page @ user:Foo21/scrap, because that is hilarious.--Foo21(talk)-(edits)-(block) 15:51, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Exactly what could they possibly do to shut us down? Sue us for being meanies? <3 First Amendment. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 15:56, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
uhhhhhhhhhh yeah. I saw this happen before, but I think 1st amentment covers us. USA!--Foo21(talk)-(edits)-(block) 16:03, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Oh my! We don't have one of those over here. Will they come and do us? -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
Fear the might of the TS UK Association! (and the US ammendmants don't work in Britain) :P --DrPoodle 23:50, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Whether the SHOOP DA WHOOP US amendments work in Britain may well be SHOOP DA WHOOP irrelevant if this SHOOP DA WHOOP mess was posted from the SHOOP DA WHOOP colonies to a SHOOP DA WHOOP US-based server. Pardon my SHOOP DA WHOOP language, but UK laws mostly apply only to SHOOP DA WHOOP things which took place in the UK. If anyone wants to wash my SHOOP DA WHOOP mouth out with soap, it would need to be in accordance with the law here. --Carlb 23:42, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Charlie Chaplin

Delete. Just doesn't seem funny. --neoEva88 03:27, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. Why do so many people think that pages full of randomness are funny? I've been having to fend one of those off a page I wrote, recently.  :P Rei 22:12, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC) agreed. This sucks. what the hell is pretending to be a pretend Nazi impersonator mean? thats like 4 negatives in one sentence. sounds like a child. --neoEva88 20:21, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hold. It's been revised by someone. It still needs to be slapped around a little more to make it funnier, but it doesn't look worthless to me anymore. -- T. (talk) 19:06, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep - I did the revising, and of course it could be funnier, but Mr. Chaplin is a great source for humor. Something needs to be there, and what's there is a start. — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 18:22, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Software piracy

Copyright violation copied directly from [1], [2], [3], [4] just to name a few. MadMax 20:14, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Copyright violations with source can be put through QVFD instead because they do'nt need voting, but it seems someone got to this one quickly anyway. I recreated it as a redirect to Piracy --Paulgb Talk 22:49, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Making up Matrix quotes

--delete - Its not really an article, just a bunch of quotes. --Paulgb Talk 00:06, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I wouldn't say it's worthy of deletion. --neoEva88 00:23, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Delete My rationale:
1. We have more than enough quote pages and quotes already.
2. This one hasn't seen much action except by the author.
3. I don't think The Matrix is quotable in the way Oscar Wilde or Winston Churchill are. I mean, the "real" Matrix quotes are made up in the first place, they aren't as well known as those by Wilde or Churchill or Einstein, and they're mostly dumb to begin with. --—rc (t) 00:33, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
zot Citing regulation 4.912 "List Excess"--Sir Flammable KUN 01:25, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Not to be. Not really a good faux-quotable source, imho. --Splaka 01:28, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Keep I'm the author. The idea, (as noted in Talk:Making up Matrix quotes) is still being worked on ... but basically it's going to eventually be a page that reveals that all the quotes (from Oscar Wilde, Mark Twain and others) on uncyclopedia are fake, as if the Fake Quotes are like the Matrix and people actually believe they are genuine and need to "free their minds." Example:

"As long as the fake quotes exist, the Wikipedia Universe will never be free."

~ Morpheus on making up quotes.

It's not supposed to be as quotable as other making up quoets pages, it's supposed to make fun of them, and make fun of the Matrix philosophy books, which quote the movies in a similar fashion. --Nerd42 16:56, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Give Time to Get Shit Together --Spintherism 18:41, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
its getting better ... look at the page again. Eventually I'm gonna make some kinda images of the Red Pill and the Blue Pill for it ... only it has to have an even funnier angle to be worth that much trouble ... i'm workin on it suggestions? Talk:Making up Matrix quotes --Nerd42 16:46, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Keep - it's getting better already. This idea does in fact have potential IMAO.


--keep - it definitely needs work, but i actually think it's very funny, and has a lot of potential - could be pretty great if the article just pulled together a bit more. --Oracleoftruth 00:11, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Keep As a parody of the Oscar quotes --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:38, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--yay that's five Keeps vs two Deletes, am I allowed to remove the VFD tag? who does that? --Nerd42 22:12, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • I say take the VFD tag out. Besides just the 5-2 voting, the page now is undeniably hilarious. The first quote makes me fall out of my chair, it alone makes the article an Uncyclopedia classic in my opinion. There's some other golden quotes in there too. If it gets any funnier I expect to see it in the VFH. --neoEva88 00:09, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • wth? it's not really that different ... you know alot more things could improve like this that get deleted instead (i.e. the Cursed Page Series) ... but enough griping. who is allowed to remove VFD tags? I started this article, if I do it it'll prolly not stay gone --Nerd42 20:21, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • KEEP This arcticle is 100 times funnier than 90% of the articles here, and that's true 87% of the time. For a site that prides itself on frivolity and humor there sure seems to be a lot of 'clenched anus' attitudes around here. Did I accidently get redirected to Wikipedia when I wasn't looking? Wiki Tiki God 16:08, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • cool! wow, suddenly such an overwhelmingly positive response. mediawiki mood swings? lol, somebody added a "spoonkid" quote. Classic. --Nerd42 03:47, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Swaziland

Pointless, unfunny random-humour. (Don't be phased by the Canada template as Swaziland isn't a Canadian province anyway.) --Ogopogo 02:07, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)

  • It appears to now be about the real Swaziland, so I would oppose a deletion. Rangeley 21:57, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects