This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Keep. There's a lot of genuinely funny stuff in that mess. I think it needs to be cleaned up, not deleted. pillow talk 19:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Now sithee 'ere lad, as t'yorkshireman, I reckon I can prune t'worst of this crap and leave summat half decent behind. It may not be a reet bobby dazzler, but it should be grand enough. --UU - natter10:25, Jul 29
Keep No way starting again is better. MrNFork you! 08:36, Jul 31
Delete
Delete I have been watching this article for a little while now and have trawled through the history and cannot seem to find a decent version. The rewrite tag had been there for months and nobody came forward to fix it up.--ChiefjusticeDS 20:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Most of that is because it is on the {{AoED}} template, that could be easily removed and has no bearing on the article's lack of funny. --SirDJ~Irreverent 02:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Weak keep It's in dire need of a clean-up, as per Orion Blaster. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 20:26, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep I agree with the above --ChiefjusticeDS 20:14, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. per above and to keep track of the pic. --Mn-z 05:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Die Starts off terrible and memey - Hippopotamus (more commonly known as Brian Peppers to hide his child porn)... He became a very influential cabana boy in interbellum East Germany, before a ridiculously circuitous sitcom plot involving sex and your mom also caused him to be nominated for the position of Supreme Court Justice. - turns even shittier with lists and a boring recount of how the Wikipedia page was lost. Utter shite best left for ED to play with. --SirDJ~Irreverent 15:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
delete. we really don't need an article on a tired internet meme. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Awful, vandalism magnet of an "article". Plus, per DJI and Gerry. --UU - natter15:03, Jul 27
Delete this crap. None of it's funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Bunch of random garbage. A page about how Wikipedia won't put up a page about Brian Peppers would be funnier. pillow talk 16:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I think that if it's deleted, we should put up a template saying that no editing on this article will be allowed until July 14, 2031, by decree of the cabal. pillow talk 16:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
No point in deleting it. We're going to be re-doing this page anyway. Might as well keep this in the page history to show the progress. WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 17:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete This is a horrible piece of crap. sofia. 03:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete, then move 2007 (year) back to this page and do what Woodburn said. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. This page is not about a year, so with the timeline rebuild, you'd be overwriting this with something completely different. I think what TKF suggests is most appropriate. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM23:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
As The Woodburninator points out, this page is part of the timeline rebuild project. If you feel strongly about this particular article, why don't you go help out; otherwise, it doesn't really make much sense to delete it. --Sirgwax (talk) 22:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
"Uncyclopedia uses what is kinda like sorta the thing with the "neutral Jew-of-Jew", which means we strive for Jews that advocate no single Jew of Jew"|*RaiTei*| (talk)
Delete. saying "Jew" repeatedly is not a substitute for humor. --Mn-z 15:08, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
5 red links are not a horrid collection of Red links. Red links are often ok...though these do seem to be stupid. WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 17:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
So what you are saying is that I need to kill Max for making me look stupid. Thanks! *goes to stalk down Max* WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 19:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Given that I'm the one who made the original statement, so I look even stupider, can I kill him a little as well? Pupt 20:47, 29/07/2009
Deleterificationed and redirecterised. --UU - natter15:32, Jul 30
Carl Edwards
Keep
Delete
delete. an article about a race car driver that contains only vague passing shadows about race car driving. but it does contain chuck norris! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep, but delete all content apart from the lyrics section. I think it would be funny that way. -- cozy Ape(crystallize)(Riot Porn) 22:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
delete. many, many violations of HTBFANJS. plus, some really weird horse fetish stuff. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete As above. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Weak delete. I don't think it's that random. It's pointing out that Ketamine, a drug of choice for clubbers, is nicknamed after a cereal. But everyone knows that, and it doesn't have anything clever to say after that. pillow talk 19:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Per Hype. I'm now going to listen to "Kids of the K-Hole" by NOFX. You needed to know that. --UU - natter10:03, Jul 29
Lame. Delete. pillow talk 18:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. And redirect per Dex. --UU - natter10:00, Jul 29
Comments
Redirect to appropriate section of the timeline. (Is it still conventional to do this?) --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 00:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, since the timeline is in the process of being rebuilt (User:Gwax/Timeline rebuild if anyone is interested) and it's been agreed upon that we won't go into the future years, I'd suggest we redirect to The Future, which is pretty vague but still accurate. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 00:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Kung Fu Panda
Keep
Delete
delete. poorly, poorly formatted, but it isn't worth the fix. some sort of harry potter / lord of the rings dickery. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Whatever the fuck this shit is, delete it. pillow talk 19:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete - technically an expired {{rewrite}}, but I thought I'd be nice and discuss its deletion here instead. --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 01:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Ugh. - I don't normally vote on this, but I feel I need to in this case. --RaikonTeikoku 04:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)RaikonTeikoku
Kerkill I don't think anything here would even be left if someone did a rewrite. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 13:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Making fun of Gerrycheevers' family is not funny. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 21:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Game theory
Keep
Delete
Kerkill The original author put it on QVFD, but since other people have editted it over the course of the two and a half years since he created it, I figure it'd be better suited for VFD. Maybe someone is interested in scooping this up? Probably not. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 00:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Not worth keeping. --Mitch 13:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Short and shit footyteamcruft from back in the mists of time (2005) that we don't need. Possibly redirect to the marginally less shit Sunderland AFC, but definitely delete. --UU - natter09:24, Jul 22
Burn I found one line keepable in this, but it's not good enough to keep the entire article. WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 20:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Kerkill Not funny. If one were to remove the lists, the article would have a handful of unfunny paragraphs. Also, I hate Survivor. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 07:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Shite and Fuck Survivor. pillow talk 18:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. How long do you think it took to make this? ;) --RaikonTeikoku 04:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)RaikonTeikoku
Delete. and while we are at it, should we deleted Category:QVFD since we don't use it? --Mn-z 14:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Carl "CJ" Johnson
Keep
Delete
delete. terrible, terrible videogamecruft. slogged through the history for a while; didn't find anything saveable SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete nothing worth saving here, which is a shame as someone could actually have made this article decent.--ChiefjusticeDS 18:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
delete. one of those articles where you can't even tell what it's about. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. As above, it's incoherent and a chore to read. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Simply unfunny. Amy Lee 13:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I don't get it. --Mitch 13:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete Do not have a clue what's going on here. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Template:User calendar
Keep
Delete
delete. seems to display random numbers, only linked from one user page, and he hasn't been around in two years. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. While it does need a little cleansing and rewriting, I don't think it needs to be deleted. There's a good article in there, it just needs to be dug out from the garbage around it. --Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 18:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Sigh - while someone obviously needs to take a chainsaw to it, there are actually funny jokes scattered randomly throughout that pile of shit. Best not to delete them, I guess. pillow talk 21:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep On one condition. Don't make me rescue this article. I'm too lazy. Dorsalfrog Prime 12:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
keep. i took a machete to it and tried to tie the existing decent content together coherently. i think it stands as a decent article. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:54, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete Listy, shitty, randomy - I hate it mAttlobster. (hello) 17:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Kerkill I get back from halfway mowing a lawn for... two hours, and I come back to find an unfunny article on VFD. Great. Can't you guys ever give me something nice? MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 18:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete It's stupid, not funny.--N4thanl 18:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete in spite 'cause a guy named Buckethead in counterstrike called me a faggot and really he was the faggot so yeah. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Crush it. Lame. Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 01:26, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
CSI: MBT
Keep
Delete
delete. what? is this australian or something? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Hooray! A spin off of a deleted article, how droll. -OptyCSucks! CUN16:53, 17 Jul
Delete. I almost think there's a case to be made for deleting all CSI and GTA articles on sight on general principles. This does suck - what a surprise. --UU - natter08:32, Jul 20
Comment. I'd have suggested this could go on QVFD as WiP abuse. I'm gonna delete it for that reason. --UU - natter08:37, Jul 20
Moosobyte
Keep
Delete
delete. this article is poor all-around, and the sentence structure made me sad especially. only linked from the byte disambig page. get rid. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Ugh. It made my heart sad and my brain, well, it made my brain excited okay? My brain has a long history of stupid reactions. -OptyCSucks! CUN16:55, 17 Jul
Delete. A bit of a mess, and not worth sorting out. --UU - natter08:30, Jul 20
Well everyone else uses completely random reasons like ‘It’ll only come back worse’ or ,’it’s had 5000 edits’ or my favourite, ‘notable’. Anyway, Mrn90210 was moaning I hadn’t reread it after someone had changed it or something, so I did and I changed my vote. I'm afraid of the dark. Especially when I'm in a park. When there's no one else around. Oh I get the shivers. I don't wanna see a ghost, it’s the sight I fear the most, rather have a slice of toast…. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:21, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete Takes the scone mixture and plunges it into a plastic container. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:45, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. And redirect. Pointless now. Also against completely random vote reasons like Matt Lobster's keep up there. WTF? --UU - natter08:25, Jul 20
Comments
JoeNumbers took the liberty of doing a transplanvt, I recommend that the keep votes reconsider their decision. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 09:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Not to offend anyone's sensibilities, but I'm moving this nomination to the top, seeing as the circumstances have changed and the contents of the article have been added to Kamasutra. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Hmm... I'm not sure on this one I have to admit. I did do a little tidy up on the article myself, and it's a lot better now. To me, it looks like these two articles are different enough that we could keep both. This article is the "less subtle" version, but I think it could improve, and take a different direction to Kamasutra... Though Tis no biggie. Oh, I mean it's huge and everything. Um. Yea... MrNFork you! 03:46, Jul 16
Can an admin other than me close this one way or the other? Where is Modus when you need him... MrNFork you! 15:17, Jul 17
This is the as exciting as VFD gets. I can barely take the tention... mAttlobster. (hello) 15:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
This article has been changed since you voted on it. Have you re-read it? No? Why? Um... Is this more exciting? Only joking. Try VFH. MrNFork you! 15:28, Jul 17
I'll delete it if it gets one more delete vote. After all, 80% of it has already been (rather gracefully) merged... --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
And as an addendum, Matt Lobster is banned from VFH for the next half hour. Seriously, man, what the hell. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 10:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. A bit of a crap keep but I am aware of this artwork which was really in vogue in the 70s/80s. The Conan films are probably the best popular representation of them. It might therefore just need pix like that for a keep. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 11:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. It's about a real person. It's not total crap. Needs some pics and this is a lot better than nothing. MrNFork you! 11:06, Jul 16
Keep. After a spot of fixing, I think it's keepable. --UU - natter10:08, Jul 17
Redirect to 0.999... as this is a barely plausible search term for someone inexperienced with the English language ... maybe ... ? --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 15:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
keep. i was rather charmed by a serious article that looked like it was copied from wikipedia without any jokes at all, making the uninformed reader puzzled as to the existence of vice city. i was fooled, anyway. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Well if anyone has a reason to delete this please let me know. MrNFork you! 16:53, Jul 17
Strong delete. Come on, now. This is just a description of the game "Grand Theft Auto: Vice City". If I wrote an article called Vvardenfel and then just wrote down everything I could remember about the game Morrowind, would that deserve to stay? This isn't funny - this is like a page out of a bad strategy guide. pillow talk 22:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I still hate this, but I can see where Gerry's coming from. -OptyCSucks! CUN16:57, 17 Jul
Uh, so turns out we just kept this a week ago. Thought it looked familiar. Speedy keeping this. Try not to renom it again within the next month and I'll try not to ban anyone. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Welp, scratch that, seems to have escaped last time on a technicality. Looks like this is heading towards a keep anyway, though... thoughts? --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Are you one of these people who has lots of old food packaging lying around your house? mAttlobster. (hello) 11:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete
delete. this alternates between straight truth and incomprehensible randomness. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
If I Had Some Milk And Bread / Tonight My Heart She Is Being Cut Out For Unpaid Cocaine Debts. --RomanDogBird!!!!!:D :D :D :D :D :D :D 05:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Strong keep. Whoever wrote this kind of outsmarted themselves by being too subtle, but this is a joke about the stupidity underlying the collapse of the tech bubble in 2000, and a joking suggestion that the dot com bubble had collapsed in earlier periods of history for the same basic reasons. I thought it was pretty damn clever - especially the "famous examples" section. pillow talk 17:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
bandwagon keep. if hyperbole gets it, then kept it shall be. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Would need drastic plastic surgery to get this one up off the table. Probably better to remove this and wait for something a lot better to come along (hopefully!). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 11:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Kill it. Sometimes these kinds of articles are funny. This is not one of those times. Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 19:18 12 July, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. Hmm... Interesting one. Can't make up my mind on it. Also, if you level that accusation at it, then you level it at all of Category:War Games as well. Mind you, there's one on there we could do without, I reckon... --UU - natter13:29, Jul 8
Useless keep. It tickles me. With some cleanup it could be okay. When this gets deleted put a copy in my userspace please. -OptyCSucks! CUN16:13, 9 Jul
Delete
Delete. If it ain't vanity, it's shite. Random, namedroppy, listy, odd and I didn't find anything to laugh at. I'm wondering how it missed ICU, to be honest. --UU - natter11:30, Jul 8
Keep. Seems to be more about other civil wars besides the USA one.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 21:45, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete
delete. unlike the uproarious Civil War article, this is terrible and has always been as such. delete & redirect to Civil War. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
delete I don't see a significant difference between this and Anal lube, except the latter is a bit better polished. At the best merge the two together. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byPuppyOnTheRadio (talk • contribs)
Delete I was at the battle of Intercourse and this in no way reflects it. Delete these nasty lies and let the burninator serve up his new brew. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Nevermind. I'm not really funny right now. Maybe in a few days, but I don't care if this gets deleted. WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 17:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Leeds
Brian Peppers
Delete. saying "Jew" repeatedly is not a substitute for humor. --
EXTERMINATE!
Keep. —
Flutter
Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 
15:18, 23 July 2009
Abstain. Looks horrible and needs a radical going over with a blunt instrument. --
Smite. —
wut? 
Redirect! 
