This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Keep. I actually went to the press conference when he 'came out' on the lizards running the world business 20 years ago....There is a lot of work/rant work in there with some regular vandalism thrown in. I don't mind trying to fix it but won't stand in anyone's way if they want to flush it away...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
OEJ. ~ 18:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep without even looking at it, since Romartus says he's going to fix it. pillow talk 19:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep Not as funny as the real story of Icke - a man who believes that the royal family can at will turn themselves into lizards, but not bad enough to delete. mAttlobster. (hello) 06:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Yawn So who was saying they were against mass deletions? --SirDJ~Irreverent 09:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep except sort of not really. I am against this kind of mass genocide - kill all of TYATU? Quite apart from that being quite a large undertaking, that would require more than just the kind of simple 5 : 0 vote that gets rid of a single article. I wouldn't object to TYATU being deleted per se, but not in this fashion. However, listing all the episodes would take forever, so perhaps a forum for proper discussion? Although someone would then say "this is a case for VFD, not the dump, I suppose. Ho hum. Anyway, yeah, not like this. --UU - natter09:39, Jun 25
What that weird fellow said. ~ 09:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Sigh. If we can't do it with the timeline... I do agree that these are pretty much shit, but I guess mass deletions are taboo. -What UU said.
Strategic Keep it keeps "certain folk" from fouling up mainspace articles. And its hidden away in its own little corner, so its not really hurting anything. --Mn-z 15:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
If it's just for the one page, keep (some of the kids seem to like it). If it's for all the pages, Invalid nomination (VFD does not work like that. Too much opportunity for evil, and not the good kind of evil, either). SirModusoperandiBoinc! 16:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. So when it comes to VFD there are typically 3 things that could potentially save an article despite it being shit: its significance as an in-joke, its significance as a blue link, and the overall effort put into it. Back in the day, when this was nommed last, I voted to keep based on the first and third reasons. However, nowadays, TYATU has stretched itself far, far too thin, and no longer carries any significance whatsoever. At best, it is just a vanity pet project of its two creators, whose self-inserts have dominated 80 percent of the action; at least back in the past, while it was still vanity, it at least pandered to other members of the site! It isn't even an in-joke anymore; the only in-joke that's arisen from it is its shocking ability to not be deleted, and what the hell kind of a horrible meta in-joke is that? As a blue link, sure, it means we'd have a lot of cleaning up to do when it comes to deleting the articles, but we've gotta do what we've gotta do. And, sure, it may look like Meganew and Uncyclopedian put in a lot of effort into this, but that still doesn't make it good. Each episode is a tired rehash of the last one, with an evident lack of humor or original content. They may be typing a lot, but it doesn't mean they're putting effort into it. Words words words, delete TYATU. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. A double first. Up for VFH and VFD at the same time. It really should be posted onto Meganew's page and left there. If were not prepared to let another writer put up his fantasy sequel to Power Rangers with him as the main mover (!) in a recent VFD then there isn't a good reason for this to exist in the main uncyclopedian space. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
This, of course, means that we'll be deleting each subsequent episode of TYATU, and not just the first. This includes all spinoffs (including my own). --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
And by that you mean "We'll be putting each episode here, for voting and, if successful, deletion", right? SirModusoperandiBoinc! 09:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
You're not gonna bring all of that here. I fucking mean it. There's like... 500 of them. I'm barely even exaggerating, either. You'll have to make a FFW or V-Week. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 09:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
I believe your title is "Poopsmith" rather than "VFD landlord"? ~ 09:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
No. I'm Mr. Furley and you kids are late with the rent! But seriously, that shit does need to be dealt with but I don't think a mass deletion vote here is good enough, as there is no way anyone will want to/could possibly read all of them to make a fair decision. Hmm... I'm going with what you said against the mass deletion of the timeline which is made up of less than 20 articles, not 300. This is just too large for VFD to handle. *psst* Huff it all as vanity and ignore complaints! It'd totally work that way. Zombiebaron would totally do it that way. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 10:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
I see the VFH has gone. But it looks like the TYATU crowd are in fact a sub species outfit here only interested in talking to themselves and placing each other in the feature. In other words - disguised vanity which I thought was an auto delete offense. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
So it's okay to nominate hundreds of articles for deletion at once, but it's not okay to nominate the timeline at once? Saberwolf116 16:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
No, its more like we don't have a way to deal with a 500 article long series of bad articles. --Mn-z 16:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
There should be a way of dealing with this as it is like horrible bindweed. It will probably double in size in the next twelve months and the people writing it will just carry on..Call the Law of TYATU in their dubious honour and have just one saved as a sad example for what writers shouldn't do.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
This does operate as an idiot-magnet, and its out of the way. It really isn't hurting anything, and I don't think it will generate similar articles in mainspace. I also don't like deleting stuff that somebody cares about. --Mn-z 17:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Ok..well I won't push it..As long as they stay in their room and keep away from the adults...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Guys, just leave me and Uncyclopedian be. To everyone here: this is the only UnScript to turn into both a series and an in-joke. Plus, deleting this will also delete everything else related to it, including most everyone's userpages, High Gen. Grue's archived pages, and the TYATU NY series(recently updated by Gert5). --High Gen.Meganew(Stuff I've Done)(Chat With Me)(Get an Award!)FORCESENLISTMUN 19:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 15:37, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
The Phantom of the Opera/Opera Draft
Keep
Delete
Delete. Abandoned sub-page draft article thingy that should possibly have been in userspace except the author isn't active any more. It's not linked from anywhere (the page it's a sub-page of is a redirect) and as far as I can see, it's pointless. --UU - natter09:43, Jun 24
Delete. One of those articles where you would have to write in the style of the original author. I don't think that is possible here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 12:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Disintegrate. 1. It should be Unpoetia, and 2.It fails HTBFANJS. Saberwolf116 14:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 15:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It's been here ages, with pretty well no edits, no decent ideas, nothing linking to it and no love. It starts out dull, thne gets random. I don't see it getting better. Get rid. --UU - natter09:19, Jun 24
Disintegrate. Schedueled for release in 2006? This thing has really, really been neglected. Saberwolf116 14:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. Not having a clue what this was all about - I stuck it in google. This Comes out third on the search list..so anyone looking to know about Sayers is going to find this site ! Should it be kept therefore..bottled even ??...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Disintegrate.Saberwolf116 23:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
shit Why wasn't that QVFDd? Orian57Talk23:08 24 June 2009
Comments
UnNews:CIA sends photo of The Cursed Wiki Article to Kim Jong-Il to attempt his assassination
Keep
Delete
Delete as nominator. Unfunny one-liner (that's a kiss of death especially for UnNews). Created by IP. Only one revision. Only one incoming link. Seems like a failed attempt at an in-joke. --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 02:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Kerkill Vanity/cyber-bullying article that started in May and has slipped under our noses since. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 08:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Invalid nom. WiP tagged towncruft, in the main, and not just vanity. Remove the vanity - which I've done - and list anyone who replaces it on Ban Patrol. If they remove the WiP tag, bring it back here. Otherwise leave it until they get bored and the WiP tag does its job. --UU - natter09:32, Jun 24
It was created by the person as vanity. I say that due to the fact the version by the original creator contained vanity (See? Who the hell are Barry scott and Geoffery Wansell?). The WiP was just added in the past 24 hours by the guy who "vandalised" it, though I bet it was the original author who wrote it has an IP. Regardless, the WiP is an invalid tag and this unfunny piece of shit falls into VFD's territory. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 09:42, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Barry Scott is best thought of as a UK Billy Mays. Geoffrey Wansell is here. There was one vanity section, as with many towncruft articles. The vanity-adder has been banned, and will get banned again if he adds it again. If he doesn't, it's likely it'll get deleted in a week as no-one else is going to edit this article so the WiP tag will do the job. If the WiP tag gets removed, bring it back here. --UU - natter09:48, Jun 24
Nah. It's kind of messy, out there, and short, but it has enough good jokes to make it worth keeping. --Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 13:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete There is absolutely nothing funny about this short, unfunny, piece of uncrap--SirACROLOKUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete This really isn't very good. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
I thought of rewriting it in braille with black pics but braille already exists XD...
Abstain. crap but notable. --Mn-z 15:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Notable; blindness is notable? You believe that not being able to see is suitably important so as an unfunny article on it should be saved? I don't think there's many people who use Uncyclopedia as a research tool. Is blindness more notable than deafness? What about if you've got a blocked nose and are unable to smell? What about people with one eye that slightly looks a different way from the other? mAttlobster. (hello) 21:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Its so bad that the "Image" implanted in my brain by this article prevents me from being able to even attempt a rewrite because i might go blind from aweful memories!Put all 911 tags on it if it is not gonna be deleted but please it hurts my soul!
Kerkill Such an awesome show deserves way better. This is a straight up insult to Zach Braff's awesomeness. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 02:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Disintegrate. Since we can't get rid of the entire timeline at once, let's take a look at it like this. I've read through this, and it's an irredeemble piece of shit. Saberwolf116 15:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. not needed for the timeline, and I don't see how it can be made funny. --Mn-z 15:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. The entire timeline is shit and something I've hated for a long time. If we have to get rid of it one section at a time then so be it. -OptyCSucks! CUN16:27, 23 Jun
Weak Keep I can some good bits in this article. If it gets deleted, it will probably come back worse. I think this is probably a better base for a rewrite than a blank slate. Plus, we don't want to have {{Ori}} to have a red link in its title. --Mn-z 06:42, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
No. First of all, I'm against the whole thing of categorically removing such a big portion. Also, I'm against deleting this rather than rewriting this. This one is a project for one of our usergroups who keep claiming that they're better than one another, not for deletion. ~ 08:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Two words: Fails HTBFANJS. It's almost entirely listy bullshit. I know it's supposed to be listy, but that's no excuse for it being bullshit. No one wants to read this shit, much less laugh at it. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 05:26 Jun 23, 2009
With the notable exception of:1927, which is an actual article with actual comedic pacing. Nothing else here has comedic pacing. Maybe comedic walking-home-drunk-from-the-pub, but not pacing. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 05:30 Jun 23, 2009
Kerkill It all sucks except for 1927 which would be kept. If someone where to rewrite, they wouldn't use anything there. It's vanity filled and meme-crufty as hell. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 05:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
STRONGEST POSSIBLE DISINTEGRATE! Ever sinced I first came onto Uncyclopedia, I have hated the timeline with a passion. With the exception of 1927, it is random, unfunny, cliche filled cruft that nobody laughs at. Perhaps it's better to let the timeline speak for itself: "A youngman wearing a pair of pants with a bumpy square pattern dances so much he heats his pants to 350 degrees and falls on pancake batter creating the waffle iron." Saberwolf116 06:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete I would do anything for love...but I wont do that...NO NO NO I wont do that. mAttlobster. (hello) 06:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete It's chock-full of the very worst in 'random' faux-humour and terrible memes. "Rip it up and start again" as Orange Juice once sang. --Zarbag 10:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I do believe this is an invalid nomination. Category-wide noms have been declared invalid in the past. --Mn-z 05:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
When, may I ask, was this? I don't recall that (I probably was doing one of my disappearing acts at that time). MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 05:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Seeing as you continually vote for articles for invalid reasons (not following guidelines) I suggest you keep quiet Mnbvcxz. mAttlobster. (hello) 06:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Now now, calm down Matt. Other than voting out of spite or because someone is paying you to vote a certain way, all reasons are valid. Also, don't edit conflict me damn you! GRR! MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 06:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Vote for an article based on whether it is funny. There need be no more criteria. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Abstain I agree with skullthumper, but mordillo brought up a good point. I think the major ones are for IC, the minor ones for unwehr. Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool08:58June23 '09
Omg, invalid, lol. "Hey, let's have this one vote on, like, twenty articles!". You're looking for VFMD (Vote for Mass Deletion) which, God willing, does not exist. Peace! Modus, out! SirModusoperandiBoinc! 09:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep Rather bizarre little pocket of sillyness - but it's a good little pocket with room for keys, mobile phone and a fresh scone. I smiled and laughed. How I laughed. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I don't mind taking this one in. Feed it some chicken and a drop of a milk. Can be saved.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
2005cruft. The last time this was edited was in 2007. Are you going to tell me this isn't terrible? MyUncyclopedianAnniversary"Celebration"(17:15 06-17-2009)
Weak Delete I can see what the author was trying to do, but I don't think "ZOMG! 1-2-3-4-5 iz a stoopid passwordz!!!1!!ONE!" can be turned into a full article. --Mn-z 03:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Stolen jokes from Spaceballs do not belong on Uncyclopedia. pillow talk 15:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Hmm. So, the page used to be better than it is? Well, we'd better delete its entire history, then. Let's get right on that. pillow talk 23:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep per Hyperbole. I suggest reverting to a better version. You know you can do that right? You're also can rewrite bad existing articles, instead of deleting them and making them anew from scratch. Anway, I think the current version is probably better than a blank slate. --Mn-z 06:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep Biggie Biggie Biggie/Can't you see/Sometimes your words just hypnotize me/ MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 16:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep Bad article, yes. You just ruined the nomination by saying it's gotten worse, hell yes. ~SponsorshipSucks !!! (16:18 06-19-2009)
Keep. No biggie. —ThelaZhel 06:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep It seems like it was whored by IPs over a long period of time; i've reverted it to a better version. Saberwolf116 13:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Came home from the pub; PVRed Ponderland which is basically Brand doing his funny thing; slapped on the laptop, hit VFD, and there was he. Bit weird. That said, article read...no chance. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 04:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Has a merge tag on it but there's nothing worth merging that I can see. Also, wish I could cut out the middle man and just delete Brand himself, little twat that he is. --UU - natter08:35, Jun 20
LOL COWBELL PLOX it's time we gave this the boot. Le Cejak•<8:45 Jun 16, 2009>
Delete. If anyone can give me one good example of this template being used in a funny way, I will change my vote. --Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 14:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
It's no better and it's no worse than some of the other templates here. However I can see this has stirred great passion in the thumping thing a few uncyclopedians have glued inside their chests. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Disintegrate. Why was this kept last time? This isn't any good. Saberwolf116 00:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. it appears that the author added a {{WIP}} tag to the article while it was on VFD. It appears that author did some work after the keep, but not enough to make it a good article. In other words, it was kept because the author was still working on it. --Mn-z 04:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Fidel Castro marries Yoko Ono...so life goes on. However this should be removed.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete - Let me tell you where I am with this...I'm OOOOOOOOOOOOT! mAttlobster. (hello) 19:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Kerkill And it was kept last time per the fact the author had still been working on it. But it looks like he didn't really finish. Oh well. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 16:19, 19 June 2009
Deletify. Hmm...That'll be a no. Nameable • mumble? 18:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
(UTC)
Comments
Dingwall
Keep
keep What is the ruling about really local jokes ? It avoids vanity and could probably be
all true as well. Also as regards images and formatting - it is at least moderately competent .--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Utter irredeemable shite~ 09:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Not having a page on Megaman can only be seen as a good thing. It's a computer game thing isn't it? People who find computer games funny normally wear stained trousers and believe the earth is 6000 years old. What am I going on about? No idea.... ehhh.. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Disintegrate.Saberwolf116 13:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Some how the Big Bang has eventually lead to the creation of this article. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Kerkill Though I was really thinking of voting keep out of spite. Then I decided to go with reason. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 22:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Disintegrate.Saberwolf116 22:28, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. it appears the author (of the same name) has recently edited article. But looking deeper, I found that the author is banned until judgment day. Hence, he won't be back to fix it. --Mn-z 04:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Poorly explained joke that relies on local knowledge to think it is funny. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
This is a not good template. However, you are still retarded for voting to delete Cowbell. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
UnNews:World Prepares for Mass Synchronized Dancing Zombie Takeover
Delete. Why this was on VFH i'll never know. 
Keep. I actually went to the press conference when he 'came out' on the lizards running the world business 20 years ago....There is a lot of work/rant work in there with some regular vandalism thrown in. I don't mind trying to fix it but won't stand in anyone's way if they want to flush it away...--
UnScripts:The Young and the Uncyclopedians
EXTERMINATE!
Abstain.. 
Nah. It's kind of messy, out there, and short, but it has enough good jokes to make it worth keeping. --
Yes, but it was still bad. It's been bad for a long time. 
Ride the Lightning by Metallica per Dex. 
