This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
Keep. It's not that bad, but if you want to move your rewrite over this, go right ahead Zana. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep Well, it's not ZB's finest work but it's MILES above the standard we normally delete here... Also, you just stole the images Zana! No need to replace this with anything. If Zana has written another article we can have both. You can't have too many sausages. Everyone knows that. MrNFork you! 11:40, Mar 7
I stole nothing! I was going to merge this article with my own until I read it. You did read it, didn't you? Anyhow, ZB went on a rampage deleting all of my stubby articles... I wouldn't want him to look like a hypocrite, or anything. – (ooh!)(aah!)...·º•ø®@»LEGCUNGUNDUN 17:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep. This isn't a stub, and I can't see why it needs to be deleted here. Why, because you want revenge? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 17:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. This is cruft, I don't see why it gets to stay here. What, because Zombiebaron wrote it? – (ooh!)(aah!)...·º•ø®@»LEGCUNGUNDUN 11:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Kinda speedy keep That's enough of that. Syndrome: Please, NO. Let's not have that kinda talk. MrNFork you! 17:30, Mar 7
Keep. - It is a bit random, but I think with some effort there might be a good article in there.--Sycamore(Talk) 08:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep. There is bad and there is random. As per my if it aint that bad policy "don't delete if its not gonna be replaced by anything better" --Kittalk16:32 6 March
Bandwagon keep per my policy of not contesting a deletion if somebody cares if the article isn't an abomination or a threat to other articles. --Mnb'z 17:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
delete. The foundation needs to be rebuilt-- 15:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
also, if any cares, I'm finished with my template jihad. The consensus has been to keep the comment templates unless they are espeically ugly. And almost all the "perverse instruction" and "random sectional" templates that I found have been deleted. --Mnb'z 05:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Weak keep. Anyone planning to work on this article, please find room to mention that in Norfolk, to Blah means to cry one's eyes out. Confused the hell out of me for ages, that did. --UU - natter09:11, Mar 5
Ix-nay. —SirSysRq (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
If Sycamore is going to do something with this to make it worth keeping, couldn't he do it in his user space? You know, like we tell everybody else? This article, like all the other "blah" articles, is pure crap. Why save it on the slim chance (judging from his own comments) that Syc is gonna make it better? -OptyCSucks! CUN19:00, 4 Mar
Huff. I'm terribly sorry I put this abomination of an article on Uncyclopedia. Perhaps being the first to vote for it's deletion will redeem me?Saberwolf116 22:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Invalid nom (1) It's less than a week old, give it time to improve and (2) you're the author, so if you want it deleted, put it on QVFD and (3) if you're just fishing for affirmation that it's a decent article, go away. I don't think it's so bad. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 00:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Weak Keep it might have some usable base material, and its retarded ranty right wing bias and helps to balance out the surplus of retarded ranty left wing bias of this site. --Mnb'z 05:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Rather a lot of poor gay jokes, but fairly well-constructed prose. Plus what Mnbvcxz said. Rabbi TechnokvetchContribsFOXES 10:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
delete. i know i'll probably get the usual 'it's a well-known subject' and 'it's better than nothing' and 'it already has a rewrite tag on it'...but i could not, in good conscience, leave this page without trying to kill it. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete Fresh start is better and all that. -OptyCSucks! CUN21:02, 3 Mar
Ix-nay. —SirSysRq (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain Merp. Flizzle. It's a well-known cloptiboop and it's better than shklonkester and it already has a gurblepoink on it. --TPLN 21:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept Enough people care, let's do something else... MrNFork you! 17:21, Mar 6
Torrid
Keep
Delete
Delete. Stubby little thing that's almost all that's left of the Guild of Calamitous Intent series. It's had an improvement tag on it for 6 months now with no change, the creator's not been active since '07, it's kinda random, not funny, and should go. --UU - natter11:15, Mar 6
Delete. OK, I'm up for getting rid of this - it's only used on a couple of pages in the Guild of Calamitous Intent series which I will also be nomming here shortly. It's mainly redlinks as most of the other articles have already been deleted, the author hasn't been active since '07, and I really don't see much point in keeping it. --UU - natter11:12, Mar 6
Ix-nay. —SirSysRq (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Too many redlinks, not enough awesome. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 15:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Guild of Calamitous Intent
Keep
Delete
Delete. And here we have the main page. Kinda random, namedroppy, has hardly been touched since the author left in 2007, I didn't find it funny, and I think it's time for this to go bye-bye. --UU - natter11:19, Mar 6
Delete. If I want to experience The Venture Brothers, I'll pop in the DVD. This is worse than that "smug" page about smog - ripping-off south park.-- 13:50, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
weak keep - Although the theory of future related articles is basically sound, I feel this this is not really deletion worthy.--Sycamore(Talk) 20:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
delete future history articles=bad --Mnb'z 19:40, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
D1337 Per Mnbvcxz. The only future-history article I want to see is one on the second coming of L. Ron Hubbard. ColinALL YOUR BASEHeaney!Casa BeySuperfly Portfolio 19:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete this is probably an invalid VFD nomination, but I like the precedent.--Mnb'z 05:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I agree most of that stuff should be deleted right away, but my question is: What should we keep? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Whatever Sycamore wants to betterfy in his namespace. -OptyCSucks! CUN22:30, 4 Mar
What I figure we got here is one of them invalid-type noms, I reckon. It's a small category, with five whole pages. Two of those pages are already listed here. At least one of them will survive. I can think of zero other things to say. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep. This is one of the first pages that I edited after joining. Most of what doesn't suck is mine. Mine! Moo ha-ha! Also, it's not great, but it's not crap. VFD is for crap. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 22:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete I just can't stand these any longer. -OptyCSucks! CUN21:48, 3 Mar
Crucify You know what, C that sucks? I'm blaming you for me seeing that. The double-edged sword of VFD is I have to see this shite. Now stop it. --TPLN 21:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! This article is Jewish! Their numbers must be decreased so their value can rise! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete. - Utter crap--Sycamore(Talk) 18:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete. One of those articles about which you wonder how it lasted for so long. Rabbi TechnokvetchContribsFOXES 18:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
OK, after consulting 21st Century Nazis it appears that Nazis are funny but all articles written after the Nazi saturation point was achieved are not funny. The template was from non-saturation days so it's funny.-- 13:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I got to touch a booby once at Saturation Point. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 13:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete For stink's sake, are there really that many world war articles? Do they all suck this bad? I refuse to check it myself. --TPLN 21:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Bleh Add zombie jokes, urine jokes and feces jokes together with some rape jokes and you get this article. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 21:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh, those were jokes? Sheesh. Gustibus without Disputandum only goes so far --TPLN 21:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Boil My God. Was there a zeitgeist at one point in time where all of these were done one after the other while people were still laughing at the first two, which may actually have been funny at the time? I know that happens sometimes. All your Jesus are belong to us. --TPLN 22:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Says the author of a stupid Jesus article.-- 01:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Template:Contradictall
Keep
um... keep? God, everyone is going to hate me for defending stupid things. Is this is the third VFD in a row where I voted keep? But I have to be honest. I suppose I don't, I could just shut up. But this actually made me laugh until I read past the first sentence. The second sentence is horrible and stupid and ruins the whole thing. But have a look - if only the first sentence is kept, and the template is reduced in size, I think this becomes pretty funny and useful. What do you think? No? --TPLN 17:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Very weak keep - Just because I like the picture. The size definitely needs reducing, and it appears to be a failed attempt at a rewrite template.-- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 21:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment. What does it say about us when there are only templates on the VFD page? ColinALL YOUR BASEHeaney!Casa BeySuperfly Portfolio 20:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
That there's too gaddamned many templates. -OptyCSucks! CUN20:53, 3 Mar
Template:Murdered
Keep
Keep Hey, wait! Can you reconsider? I changed it so that it won't look so ugly. I'm still fixing it, so give it a chance.--Smokin'Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 00:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Extremely weak and conditional keep I know I'll get lambasted for it, but I've decided I actually kind of like this template. Not a lot. And not as is. I would change the text to "The author of this article has been murdered. Round up the usual suspects." Also shrink it down a bit. This would make it more generally usable by being less specific about its intent and might add a bit of a laugh when used right. I like the blood splat picture though. But I'm a bit warped, as I'm slowly learning. Maybe somebody should just tell me to quit already (hey, I'm trying). --TPLN 17:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Appears on only one page, which is tagged WIP. The template adds nothing to that page, but we should still transclude it since, you know, the author is working on it. pillow talk 18:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Once again.....where do you find this shit?-- 23:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Also What's the big deal? Is it hurting anyone to have that there? If you don't like it, don't look at it. The question comes to mind, "Is this what you do?" Do you just regularly look for things to have deleted? As was said already, it's only on one page currently. Therefore, it shouldn't have been easy to find unless you were 1.Looking for it, or 2.Stumbled upon it accidentally.--Smokin'Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
I know, seriously. It's like when your mom picks up some random piece of paper with your Oblivion notes on it that you left in front of the PlayStation with your cereal bowl and asks you if it should be thrown out. I mean, seriously - is that what she does? It's like she's just looking for things to throw away. She wouldn't have even seen it if she didn't go into the family room. Right? --TPLN 00:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
No it's not like that at all. An you know it. You just wanna be a smartass. Ohh, haha. There's a difference between throwing away trash that's in the middle of the main room and throwing away something that's in the back corner of the one room in the basement that nobody ever looks in and that one person is keeping for their own purposes.
Also, I don't remember being asked if it should be thrown out. These guys just decided it should be thrown out without ever consulting me. I didn't even know it was up for deletion until about an hour ago.--Smokin'Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
Sorry for the smart-assiness. No, in this case I don't believe it is different. I think you'll find that these gentlemen are very consciencious of this whole house, and are trying to be very diligent in keeping it tidy. They have special super-secret pages that list every template that gets created that they go over with great diligence. So it isn't personal - they are not going into your back room and pulling things out of the corner. A template is a thing in the living room. That was my snarky point. User pages are your back corner. Again, sorry for the smart-assiness, sometimes it's just irresistable. --TPLN 00:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Its not like we go over everything, but we normally catch most bad pages through the ICU template. We really don't watch the templates very consistency (unfortunately). If your template was under 7 days when I found it, it would have gotten an ICU template. --Mnb'z 01:06, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Don't believe a word of Mnb's comment above. They go over everything. It's a non-existent cabal, and non-existent cabals don't let anything slip by unnoticed. I just said too much. --TPLN 01:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Cheddar: We're proposing transcluding it to your user page, and AFI (meaning we'll just cut-and-paste the code in). We just don't want this in template space, where other authors would be tempted to slap it on their articles, or other articles. Because, frankly, so far, no one finds it to be very funny or good. Nothing personal: all of us write things that are neither funny nor good. pillow talk 01:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment. What does it say about us when there are only templates on the VFD page? ColinALL YOUR BASEHeaney!Casa BeySuperfly Portfolio 20:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, okay I'll move the murder template to my user page, if that means I can keep it, if someone tells me how (I think I know but I'm not positive.) But don't move the AFI page just yet. I'm actually working on getting that to a real page. I put out image requests and I've put it on the Pee Review twice.--Smokin'Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
It's done Murdered template is now on my user page, so if you feel you must, go ahead and delete the old one.
Keep I like it. If it makes some articles look ugly, just don't use it in those articles.--Smokin'Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
Weak keep It doesn't seem all that bad to me. Maybe it could be improved (e.g., maked?), then it might be a nice silly little guy. I don't know. --TPLN 01:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete
delete ugly this is X template that is ugly clutter in all the articles it is used in. --Mnb'z 17:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
This template is very specific to Norman Borlaug and would probably not work on any other article. Transclude it there, and delete it from template space. pillow talk 18:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment. What does it say about us when there are only templates on the VFD page? ColinALL YOUR BASEHeaney!Casa BeySuperfly Portfolio 20:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep but combine with John Effkendee in some way. "My Favourite Presidents" or somesuch. Rabbi TechnokvetchContribsFOXES 13:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I like that idea Rabbi, if no-one else does it, I will (eventually). --UU - natter13:16, Mar 2
I was hoping someone would say that, otherwise I'd have had to get off my arse and do it myself. :-) Rabbi TechnokvetchContribsFOXES 13:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Terrible example of little kid writing. IronLung 02:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment. JFK is not exactly a fake president. I don't really buy into those conspiracy theories. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 02:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Parody of school essay about president. Teacher comments made me smile. Has potential to be betterer. Rewrite tag? --UU - natter11:49, Mar 2
Keep as per UU. Maybe it'd look better if it was in some font resembling a childish style of handwriting? Or do 9-year-olds have laptops at school these days? In my day we used chalk and wrote on turnips. Rabbi TechnokvetchContribsFOXES 13:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Fake president pages and no TV make Homer something something. IronLung 02:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain I really don't like deleting intentionally bad stuff. Its not a good "cute" article, and I would have voted deleted on account of the randomness, but the teacher comments at the end make it just barely good enough. --Mnb'z 03:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)