This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Strong Keep I've seen much, much worse. If this image is unused, it should be deleted by the admins (or whoever does the deletions of unused images.) I nominated an image recently which speedily kept that was ten times as obscene looking. (And in hindsight, it should have been kept.) This page if mainly for dealing with mainspace articles that nobody cares about.--Mnbvcxz 18:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Keep. I'm not fond of this image. But I can see how it would be funny to some, which is better than some of the shit on here. It's alright. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 01:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Compassionate Keep Cum Dumpster? Well, I'm saving this picture unless they keep this. It's funny. |Si PlebiusDato' (Sir)Joeang AussieCUN|ICKill| 05:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Not a great pic, but that's not the point of pics. It's not repellent, and it's used, so it stays. --UU - natter10:51, Dec 8
Delete - Totally unfunny pic that probably took 5 minutes to make in Photoshop.--Uncreative Username 20:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Comment - I didn't nominate it because it was "too obscene" for Uncyclopedia. In fact, I have uploaded some of the most explicit images on this website. I nominated this image because it sucks.--Uncreative Username 20:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Being "unfunny" isn't a good reason to delete an image. The funniness of an image is mostly dependent on its context in an article, some of the best image/caption pairs have complete deadpan images. Getting rid of an image by a VFD vote won't improve the quality of the the wiki. If an image is that unfunny, you should orphanize it; that is, remove it from every article. If the image is on a userpage or somewhere else where you can't remove it, that means somebody cares about it; therefore, it shouldn't be deleted.--Mnbvcxz 21:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
The image itself is the "joke", and no caption will make it any more funny.--Uncreative Username 00:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Kept. Invalid vote, no VFD template, too many for votes, nominator banned for a week and so on and so forth. ~ Mordillo where is my BITCH? 16:21, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete - A worthless piece of garbage that would make even ED cringe with embarrassment. Ugly, nasty, vile, and totally unfunny. Images from the article should also be deleted. Once again, it's a dreadful attack page of the ED variety. HUFF, HUFF, HUFF!--Uncreative Username 22:25, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 05:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Not the worst article out there, but has been around for a while without improving. We already have Marijuana which is far better. Suggest this is deleted and redirected to that? RabbiTechno 20:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Just isn't funny. --FlyingFool 22:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete. We already have a featured article about this topic. I know there's a lot of drug names and types, but doesn't anyone else find this sort of redundant? --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 00:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Weak Keep. Marginally funny, might be fertile ground for a funny image if anyone ever got round to making one. RabbiTechno 16:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Unfunny orphan, orphaned since 06. In Your Face 02:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I managed to get as far as "eye beams" before the FFS reflex became unbearable. --UU - natter09:19, Dec 5
Comments
Fargo (film)
Keep
Delete
Delete: Absolutely dreadful. Obviously written by someone who loves this film and is afraid to make fun of it. Littered with horrible grammar and embarrassing typos. Not even ED-worthy (since it doesn't have enough Goatse) and I can't imagine Wikipedia accepting it either. It doesn't really fit on any website, especially not Uncyclopedia.--Uncreative Username 01:11, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Throw it in the woodchipper Unfunny stub. In Your Face 05:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete. per above.--Mnbvcxz 05:37, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Keep. I think it could benefit from a rewrite, but it's not a total loss at this point. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byJasonBoer (talk • contribs)
Delete
Delete. Unfunny, listy, random, and short (if you discount the lists). --UU - natter10:33, Dec 3
D1337 Because of this (aka. Supreme Divine Guru Master of All in the World)ColinALL YOUR BASEHeaney!Casa BeySuperfly Portfolio 17:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete ASAP. Been sitting in Quick VFD for two days and nobody's touched it. Clearly a cut & paste from Wikipedia. In Your Face 20:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
GAY PEOPLE! Lololololololol! But seriously, now. This is terrible. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 23:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Rugrats
Keep
Delete
Delete. Unfunny crap, never been expanded, even lousy pics. In Your Face 02:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Sometimes, a blank canvas is preferable to what's there. A really bad page can put people off trying to improve it. This is just random rubbish. --UU - natter09:36, Dec 2
Present This isn't even worth the weakest possible abstain; however, I believe every article about notable subject matter should be kept, in order to give the future re-writer ideas; however, I also am aware that I am about the only person that holds to that crackpot theory.--Mnbvcxz 05:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Crap articles stop people creating good ones sometimes. MrNFork you! 18:03, Dec 2
Marcon
Keep
Delete
Delete. Unfunny, has been a work in progress for 3 years with 0 improvement. In Your Face 06:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Abstain its bad, and it looks listy and attack-filled with more than a hint of random. However, it just doesn't look quite delete worthy for some reason.--Mnbvcxz 21:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
The Presidential Battle Royale of 1975
Keep
Delete
Delete. historical nonsense.--Mnbvcxz 17:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Boring. In Your Face 03:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I... Uhh... What? --UU - natter15:49, Dec 1
Delete. The title is the best part about it. •••Necropaxx(T){~}17:27, Dec 2
Delete. Random thing that Gert started a while ago and seems to have forgotten about. If he still wants it, maybe a copy in userspace would be a better option? --UU - natter14:07, Nov 28
D'leet. Way too profane for my taste. •••Necropaxx(T){~}17:27, Dec 2
Comments
Vyse
Keep
Keep article isn't that bad, it makes sense, and has notable subject matter.--Mnbvcxz 13:45, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Short, listy, unfunny gamecruft that was created in May '07 and hasn't really been touched since. Not linked from anywhere, not going to get much better. --UU - natter12:47, Nov 28
Delete (as nominator). This article is not of sufficient quality to be worth including in {{windows}}, or anywhere on Uncyc for that matter. It is functionally orphaned (the only links to it are a redirect created by a move as well as this VFD page). --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 03:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete. per above.--Mnbvcxz 03:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Short, poor concept, no laughs. --UU - natter15:48, Dec 1
Delete. - Lousy 2005 stuff. Random and poor throughout--Sycamore(Talk) 09:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 14:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete Unfunny. In Your Face 03:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. No worthwhile ideas, no funny. --UU - natter15:42, Dec 1
Comments
ROFLism
Keep
Delete
Delete. Random 2006 thingy that's had little love since, and is, once again, not linked from anywhere. Makes no sense and won't be missed. --UU - natter19:04, Nov 28
Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 04:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete Unfunny in every way. In Your Face 03:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Ronny Jhutti
Keep
Delete
Delete. I was going to remove the serious text added by someone who seems to be a fan of Ronny, but then I looked at the rest and wondered why I should bother. There's a couple of lists, and a line or two. I don't see anything worth expanding here either. Am I in a bad mood today or something? --UU - natter19:15, Nov 28
The only thing about this article that amused me was that attempt to salvage Mr. Jhutti's credibility. Also, if this guy's so notable, why haven't I heard of him? - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 18:29, Nov 29
Weakest Possible Abstain As per my crackpot theory about never deleting any article about notable(-ish) subject matter.--Mnbvcxz 04:05, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Weak Keep looks fairly popular, notable subject matter, has some humor. Looks like a purge or rewrite.--Mnbvcxz 02:30, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep. It needs a trimming, and it's not great, but I don't think it's complete crap. It may have sat in rewrite for ages, but that's what it deserves more than deletion. --UU - natter12:57, Nov 28
KEEP! Guys. Just because something needs more work is not a reason to delete it. We only delete if there is nothing there worth saving. This has something so lets not go deleting stuff like this... MrNFork you! 21:36, Nov 28
Delete
Delete. - Lousy Crime Biography, has sat in re write for years, with little progress.--Sycamore(Talk) 10:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Delete and redirect to That one movie, which I've merged all the decent content from this one into. --UU - natter14:35, Nov 28
Delete and redirect. That one movie is better. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 15:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete, but a couple of the parts merged into that one movie don't quite fit because of the switch from first to second person. I'll take a look, but you might wanna check through for the things I'll inevitably miss. - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 15:26, Nov 28
Keep It a great idea and I already love the pictures on the page. We can improve the article by Deorphaning it an]d doing some more expansion on funny GG moments like the ones there. Also you should make Good Game Redirect there or vice versa. Anyway I Played a Fisher Price game with 4.252.99.182 and I told him GG and he told me go eat shit fuckers. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 08:08, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep What? It's worthy of an article, and this is a good, game start to such. You abstainers get of the fence and vote dammit! MrNFork you! 01:43, Nov 27
Delete. I don't get the joke for one, and it's just plain pointless and orphaned. In Your Face 04:17, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Strong Abstain for reasons other than my crackpot theory about NEVER EVER deleting notable material It doesn't look that bad for the topic, I'd suggest a rewrite. However, I don't like it enough to say keep.--Mnbvcxz 01:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm on the fence It could use some help from more seasoned Uncyclopedians, and I love the pictures. But in this form, it's not good enough. --JasonBoer
No, really... People need to take another look at this. Look at the articles which are linked... I cleaned it up a tiny bit, but it really did make me laugh. It's actually not a bad article at all. Surely there is worse than this around? Agreed, it needs work, but so does my garage roof. I'm not going to delete that as I would get wet. No I don't live in the garage. Honest. MrNFork you! 23:54, Nov 27
:Image:Cdperfume.jpg
Strong Keep I've seen much, much worse. If this image is unused, it should be deleted by the admins (or whoever does the deletions of unused images.) I nominated an image recently which speedily kept that was ten times as obscene looking. (And in hindsight, it should have been kept.) This page if mainly for dealing with mainspace articles that 
Delete.--
Baba
