This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Delete. - Unfunny and doesn't even sorta approach making sense.--Mnbvcxz 21:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Davetopia
Keep
Delete
Delete.. It's vanity disguised as a small armadillo. --Asahatter (annoy) 22:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I thought this was a new article but no its crap from 2005 that managed to survive 3 years of hell here. Those Crappy Orphan Articles are he reason why they have the Random Page Link. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 08:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep Too new for me to vote anything other than keep. It's got a {{fix}} on it. That means that if it's not fixed after 30 days it may be deleted anyway. No need to bring things like this to VFD. MrNFork you! 20:13, Nov 12
Also keep. Plus, you just reviewed it. It's at least common courtesy to let people have a little time after a review to see if they do anything about it. It's better to watchlist it for a while and see if it gets made betterer, then bring it here if it doesn't. Except, in this case, it's best to leave it to the fix template as MrN says. --UU - natter20:25, Nov 12
Speedy Keep per not signing the nom vote Read rule #3 above. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Invalid nom. 1. It's got a construction tag on. 2. You didn't add a VFD tag to it. Welcome to VFD, BY, have a quick look at the rules before nomming, OK? --UU - natter16:41, Nov 13
Delete
Delete -- It's basically empty, and what there is is practically an incarnation of the Anti-Funny. BlueYonder - CONTACT
Comments
As the poopsmith said. ~ 16:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Absolutely not random. When I first joined here, the whole Euroipods Crusade bit was one of the funniest arguments I'd ever read, and it made me stick around. Keep it for the memories of those long since past, however unpleasant said memories may be. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy Keep This article is not eligible for VFD per the page being placed in the In Jokes Category by an Admin. See the line on the top section of the VFD page: "This also applies to Uncyclopedia In jokes (see: In-Jokes)." Also the article is preaty funny and very well worth keeping. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 07:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep. While I've never really found this funny, it is undeniably an important piece of Uncyclopedia history. pillow talk 09:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Kelp If you delete this, UNCYCLOPEDIA DIES. Or dies more than it usually does. --SirDJ~Irreverent 09:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Essentially, it's a list. It's about a fictional Weird Al album, it's random and it just gets crapper as it goes on. An hangover from 2006, not really edited much, and not linked from anywhere so won't be missed. --UU - natter16:04, Nov 12
Delete. 2005cruft. Stubby, with sexcruft, nothing particularly interesting going on, no links to it and a general air of forgettableness about it. --UU - natter14:37, Nov 12
Delete. Patent bollocks/vanity (as suggested by Hindleyite on the talk page) originally created at WP by some bored teenagers, and then brought here. No funny, no point, no links to it, no reason to keep. --UU - natter11:33, Nov 12
This is highly random stuff, but not in any sense 'good'. -- HindleyiteConverse 17:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Scandenopia
Keep
Delete
Delete. It's been here since 2006, but nothing links to it, and there's been precious little done to it. And what's there is short, listy, odd and unfunny. --UU - natter09:14, Nov 11
Delete. The title's got some potential, but the concept is just impossible to write something good at. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 22:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete.--Asahatter (annoy) 23:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
I like it. Don't ask me why. ~ 17:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Is this like a Super Keep, where your vote goes even higher than the keep box? pillow talk 17:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Gives me five extra points. ~ 17:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
You broke the fourth wall. How Pythonesque of you. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 17:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. - Unfunny. Does not improve articles that it is transcluded into. At all. pillow talk 17:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I give this one a frosty reception. I look at the articles it's on and I think... "Yea, someone slapped that on there cos they thought it was the right thing to do, but it's making the article look bad" so it gets the cold shoulder from me. MrNFork you! 17:58, Nov 9
Keep. This was funny. Why? I have no idea. But it was. No, it doesn't make sense. But... there's something about it. A bizzarre, twelve-year-old-like charm to it. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 22:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - This was just a bad idea from the start. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Grues, Norris, randomity... This would, I submit, be a great entry for ?pedia. But here? Nah. --UU - natter22:42, Nov 4
Delete. - Gratuitous boobage, Norris, Wilde, the Great Dildo Faggins, random dates, Microsoft, and a title that just screams "Do I really need to read the article to know its VFD?"--Mnbvcxz 03:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. OK, this has been here since 2006, it seems, and I'm at a loss to understand why. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say it's vanity, the content, plus an edit made today and the talk page comment, plus a few googles, seem to bear this out. And it's not funny. And I'd like to see this go, but I place it before the community to see if you disagree, or if someone knows something I don't. --UU - natter15:52, Nov 10
Delete. - I thought the same thing--Sycamore(Talk) 15:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - yep, it's vanity. A quick Google or 2 makes you go blind brings up the "stars'" Fecebook profiles etc. Asahatter (annoy) 16:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Random and odd. Created in August, not touched since. Not linked from anywhere, and did I mention it's random and odd? --UU - natter15:13, Nov 10
Keep. I kinda like it, in an odd way. I certainly like the idea. If it goes, I'll have a copy in my userspace please. I may have a tinker if I get time. --UU - natter11:48, Nov 10
Strong keep. Despite the awful formatting, I think this is funnier than at least two-thirds of the stuff on the site. With a little cleanup and expansion, I bet UU could turn this around into a feature. pillow talk 17:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep. To tell you the truth, I kind of like it as is. Though a picture would be nice. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 22:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. - Poor IP article little progress, crap writing, lame concept and nothing that seems worthwhile to keep.--Sycamore(Talk) 18:04, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Weak keep Its in reference to the warning labels on some products, which state "This product is known by the state of California to cause cancer, ect" Basically, its a weaselly warning label due to different regulations between states.--Mnbvcxz 19:11, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Very Strong Keep For Fucks Sake I use that template on my page. Also this template makes fun of a Law that requires stuff that contains certain chemicals to stat its known to cause cancer in California. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Vague keep. Eh. At least it's not big and massively ugly. --UU - natter11:26, Nov 10
Keep.. Funny but true, my mobile home park has a plaque with the gist of this template written on it. I've now lost both my prostates to cancer. •••Necropaxx(T){~}17:34, Nov 10
Delete
Delete. - I'm guessing this is a reference to something in California politics in late 2005. It isn't funny now. Let's lose it. pillow talk 18:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Calling this one a "mess" would be charitable. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete, with an explanation. Alright, mate, Hype and I are both assholes. Problem is, there's no redeeming bit of this article. It's senseless and random. I mean, do you really like it? Reading over it, do you think it's super funny? I'm not sure what you're talking about half the time. You can do better. I had articles deleted too, and looking back, it was for excellent reasons. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 22:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Or shift into SWJS's userspace, where he can improve it at his leisure. It's massively random, needs a lot of the pointless sexcruft removing, and generally needs a lot of attention. SWJS: you can try putting it up for pee review, and see what advice you get, but I doubt you'll get much help fixing it up unless you find another DAH nerd who doubles as a decent writer. That said, good luck with it! --UU - natter22:31, Nov 4
Delete - per the others--Sycamore(Talk) 10:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Comment. - This was my first article. Yes I know it sucks. Hell I suck. But the other article I created, which was BETTER than this one, and got a higher review score than this one, was deleted first. Instead of being an asshole and placing it under VFD, maybe you can try and help fix it up? --SWJS: The All Knowing Destroy All Humans! Nerd(Cortex Scan) 21:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I'd be more than happy to help you with this if you want, but there's a procedure. First, put a copy in your userspace, or, if it's already deleted, you mention - here or on an admin's talkpage - that you'd like an admin to put a copy in your userspace. They always do. Then, you work on it. If you want help, you submit it to Pee Review. If you want me personally to go help with it, you leave a message on my talk page. Finally, when it's lookin' good, you move it back into mainspace. It will probably get deleted in the meantime, but if it's out of commission for a week or two, who cares? It'll be around for years after that. Of course, only take the time to do all this if you're really committed to this subject. Otherwise, it might be a better idea just to write another article. Good luck! pillow talk 22:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Conan O'Brien
Keep
Very Weak Keep I suggest leaving the article up until some one can do a complete re-write, sense its a biography of a well known person.--Mnbvcxz 23:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. - This is some absolutely unredeemable shit. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Ah jeez - that's random. I can see the need for a Conan article. But a blank canvas is probably a better starting point than this wall o' crap. --UU - natter22:18, Nov 4
Abstain. I would say delete but it appears that someone would love to rewrite this. If the page is deleted it would create soo much red tape when tring to recreate it as it would end up on QVFD no matter how good it is, due to the VFD. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I really don't think it would create too much red tape. Solid Snake was deleted about 50 times and finally the page was protected. I wrote an article in userspace and asked an admin to unprotect the page, and that was pretty much all the red tape involved... pillow talk 17:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Generic war
Keep
Delete
Delete. - Meme riddled random 2006 stub, little progress. too vauge to be good place to start from--Sycamore(Talk) 17:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Appears on only one page; it's the same as the pointless Template:Conspiracy, except it says "OSCAR WILDE HEADS" in red letters, which is only semi-coherent (I guess he "heads" the conspiracy?). Let's get rid of it. pillow talk 17:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Abstain. This template should not belong on the main space as it only links to 2 user pages and a template directory. Therefore I suggest it should be userspaced. BTW I fail to get the joke on this one. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Template:Capitalists
Keep
KEEP ON USERPAGES. Just as a side note: as we do this for templates, VFD should serve as a way of cleaning up our mainspace articles. The "No Tampering With Userpages" should always apply here, and I'd just like to state that right now: I'll probably say it again in the HyperVFD forum topic, as well. Otherwise, delete. I'm just making sure that this is noticeable. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 23:22, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete.- An advisory template should actually warn the reader, not clutter up space.--Mnbvcxz 19:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)keep changed per rule against deleting userspace templates.
Dé¬é†é Nöt funny. Lucario! 20:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. It's teh ugherlee. But keep in userspace by pasting in code per Modus's comment in the forum. (Even though that sounds like a lot of work - fire up MrN's bot!) --UU - natter11:28, Nov 10
Abstain. Meh it looks bad on the mainspace pages just remove them from their but keep them on the user pages and user space this template. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
I'll just subst the templates on the userpages, as I normally do. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Horiemon
Keep
Delete
Delete. - 2005 stub, little progress and poor throughout. Random also--Sycamore(Talk) 18:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete - per above, random topic, gratuitous unfunny pr0n references.--Mnbvcxz 19:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep. I think we're fishing here for things to delete. Delete this, and you might as well start cleaning out the various babel versions. If we're so disturbed about this, I'll move it to babel. But seriously, I think we should concentrate on bad articles rather than those random bits that are present all throughout the site which contributes so much to its wackiness. ~ 11:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep. There is much worse stuff on the wiki. Like Mordillo, it looks like some of this is fishing for deletion. You could probably find 3 articles worse than this by hitting the random page button 10 times.--Mnbvcxz 00:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep, for the sense of history. I was there, man. I was there. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - This was created a few years back by Nintendorulez - It was also on VFD before. A bit pointless and unfunny, not something thats needed.--Sycamore(Talk) 14:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
|)∑Ł∑†∑ – ∩ø† ƒüññÿ. Lucario! 19:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Pointless Pants Oh yea baby. Guess who's back, MrN's back, MrN's back, MrN's back. ummmm - "Shut the fuck up MrN". Oh. Yea, OK then... MrNFork you! 20:38, Nov 7
Pointless... Shirts. See what I just did there? Yeah, I'm witty. I know. You don't have to tell me. Really, you don't. You're sweet for saying it, though. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 00:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Pointless whatever. --UU - natter08:59, Nov 8
|)∑Ł∑†∑ Replacing letters with symbols is so hilarious, especially when you don't change anything else --SirDJ~Irreverent 03:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete most of the Templates on the page and then we will have a good article as I am voting Keep. here. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 10:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. - Can't see the humor in this. pillow talk 23:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Its just not funny.--Mnbvcxz 23:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Comment.I went ahead and removed some of the excessive templates on the page that I felt ruined the quality of the page per the edit at [1]. The excessive template spam was probably a reason for VFD here. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 10:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Mr winkler is COOL
Keep. - This was protected some time ago, I don't think the cabal approve its demise.--
Delete.. In-joke based on an in-joke. Plus it's a stub. 
Consett
Comment. - This was my first article. Yes I know it sucks. Hell I suck. But the other article I created, which was BETTER than this one, and got a higher review score than this one, was deleted first. Instead of being an 
Abstain. I would say delete but it appears that someone would love to rewrite this. If the page is deleted it would create soo much 
