This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Delete. Yeah, this is part of a massive series on the Remington Steelers. I don't like any of the pages based on the Remington Steelers. If there's a new wiki for them, can we get rid of them? --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 17:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments
There is a related article, You Snooze, You Lose, and a new (~ August 18, 2008) Wiki on the fictional band "The Remington Steelers". Apparently someone considers it a fad "which started on Uncyclopedia but now has moved on to spawn its own Wiki on Wikia." As far as I can tell the "fad" consists of a writer with the username Ryanasaurus0077. Interesting idea, and I wish him the best with it. ----OEJ 18:35, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Keep I gave it a little tidy up. It's about a real person... Not written by an idiot... OK, not supper funny, but it's OK. Might was well keep it. MrNFork you! 19:09, Oct 4
Keep I think the funniest part about this is how it's written, actually. Whether it's intentional or not, it just perfectly captures how a twelve year old would go about making fun of something... --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Kelp Strange thing is that is a perfectly plausible explanation for his theories. --SirDJ~Irreverent 03:46, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Kerkill Unfunny with a stupid list of winners (Chuck Norris appears thrice. Yes, thrice is correct.). --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 21:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
"To be quite honest, I have no idea what these songs are about. You listen to them. Maybe edit this to make this approved by the guys here at Uncyclopedia. But this stuff is gonna stay. Deal with it."Delete. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 11:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete. If it weren't for that commanding comment at the end, I might have actually thought about this. As is, no hope for it, delete. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's not bad at all. why delete it? --Goomba94 16:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Keep Ain't all that bad, but it needs a lot more prose to make it really funny. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Ix-nay. Consists of a lame introduction and a pointless list of bands and their songs without the title in the lyrics. 100% true, 0% percent funny. - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 23:18, Oct 1
Ummmmmm I think the writer of this article was lost. This is Uncyclopedia. pillow talk 23:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
delete. preserve the talk page somewhere, though...STM claims that 'coldplay rocks', which should result in him being deducted 5 features. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
These kinds of songs annoy me. This article annoys me more, though. Delete. —–Sir Heerenveen,KUNUotMRotMVFH (talk), 3/10 19:55
Delete - 99% of mainspace subpages are known to contain pure, unbridled shite. This is not one of the 1%. —–Sir Heerenveen,KUNUotMRotMVFH (talk), 3/10 19:43
abstain for now: I'm not convinced it's pointless, especially since it is a subpage, and one analogous to a wikipedia page. It keeps the list off of the Norway page and, while it isn't great, it isn't horrible. --monika 20:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
The site is against lists as they are unfunny and poor writng style, just keeping them off the Norway page is not a reason for keeping them. — SirSycamore (talk) 20:42, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Isn't that the reason we keep a list of Chuck Norris facts on their own subpage? --monika 20:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
I did not know that... interesting /Evil Spang plots more deletions... — SirSycamore (talk) 20:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Console War (video game)
Keep
Delete
Oscar Wilde says mah t3mpl4tes pwn u nub Basically sums it up. I think it may have tried to be a parody on the sales of the main consoles today... but Oscar Wilde says otherwise... --SirDJ~Irreverent 11:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete - personally, I find the whole video game series to be awful. But just this one will do, I guess. —–Sir Heerenveen,KUNUotMRotMVFH (talk), 3/10 19:48
D: These articles with a very good idea, but poorly written are difficult as if you delete them the idea is generally forgotten. --SirDJ~Irreverent 11:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
This is why they have no business being on VFD, but should be tagged for rewrite or handed off to a clever community member who is good at rewrites. VFD should be used only for articles that are so bad that Jesus Christ couldn't even save them. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 19:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Not funny, full of random crap, becoming IP fodder with lists galore, surely going to be a cliche article in no time. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 20:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete Recycle the scrap metal. Extremelyestlybored 23:25, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments
i'm from boston. it's not that big. i remain unimpressed. now if he were to have a diamond the size of, say, corpus christi, TX... SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:32, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Andi Peters
Keep
Delete
Delete. - Some top notch stuff here but I am a perfectionist. — SirSycamore (talk) 15:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Kerkill Old and unfunny. Oh, this once also one of the first articles on VFD ever. All the way back in March 2005. --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 21:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Oadby
Keep
Delete
Delete. - Very poor towncruft, little here to redeem it and there has been little progress. — SirSycamore (talk) 14:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Kerkill The only redeeming thing is the failure template. That Dr. Zoidberg! --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 21:16, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Jamiroquai
Keep
Delete
Delete. - Very little progrees on this trully awful music article. Messy and not funny at all - The topic is dodgy, I think that it will sit in rewrite for a long time unless it is deleted and started from scratch. — SirSycamore (talk) 10:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - There has been little progress on this stubbish/random oddity. It has been repeatly vandalised since it was created in 2007, I can kind of see why, theres something more disturbed than funny about it, its kind of just "nasty" for want of a better description. I doubt anyone will miss this. — SirSycamore (talk) 21:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I thought it was predictable and boring. And underdeveloped. ----OEJ 15:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Some of its very good because its copied from my Glasgow article, the rest is just very poor, and little progress has been made by the IP author. — SirSycamore (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Single 2007 author, badly written, little progress, The topic lends itslef to be started again from scratch. — SirSycamore (talk) 09:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete. This is utter garbage. Random, incoherent, badly written. ----OEJ 15:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Great band, shame about this bizzare Donnie Darko thread being followed here. Badly written/random and not really a great place to work from. No point putting it in rewrite. — SirSycamore (talk) 12:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Aw... When I see an article badly written about a good band, it hurts me on the inside. And when I see a badly written article on a good movie and band, well... someone else might die. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 22:52, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Largely the work of two authors who have worked tirlesly o make this even more crap then when it was first created. In my opinion it is too random and this article is too poor that it will serve as worthwhile topic to have or a starting point for even the best writer — SirSycamore (talk) 21:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete: As per Sycamore; random with added meme content. Bleah. ----OEJ 15:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete: Bah. Didn't work out like how I thought it would. Tried to rewrite but still unfunny. Bomb away! --Just!n 23:03, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Lengthy, pointless and nothing worth worth keeping There has been little progrees n any kind of improvement. — SirSycamore (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's actually not a real University, but a commonly used word. "Most degrees at Oxbridge last for 3 years, although some, such as chronology, last for significantly longer, and some, such as gullibility, last for no time at all" The author has some skills and I think it just needs a tidy up... Which I will do. MrNFork you! 07:36, Sep 27
weak keep - as per MrN9000's cleanup — SirSycamore (talk) 08:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Written arund the time of the popular fims release, not funny, poorly written etc. More a a fan piece than a satirical article. — SirSycamore (talk) 12:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Poor University article, little to work from, and very poor throughout. It seems like an idea to start from scratch. — SirSycamore (talk) 11:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Ingestion of Gb may cause "little shits." --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 20:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Comment.Would somebody remove the old VFD tags off of some of the deletion survivors.—The preceding unsigned comment was added byCount of Monkey Crisco (talk • contribs)
Comment. No. pillow talk 18:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete. If there were a bot that deleted every Mainspace article containing the text "Bowser," Unyclopedia would benefit. pillow talk 23:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
For. the above idea. And I like to see others deciding to kick the butts of Mushroom Kingdom cruft. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 18:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Template:webcomic
Keep
Delete
Well, really. If a template isn't funny, it should at least be useful. This is neither. --L 12:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
This template is about webcomics. Please delete it. pillow talk 17:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Do what the template says and delete it. (If a poopsmith is quick, there will be no more sarsages again.) --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 20:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete. — 
Rudolf Steiner
Keep. — 
Comment.Would somebody remove the old VFD tags off of some of the deletion survivors.—The preceding 
For. the above idea. And I like to see others deciding to kick the butts of Mushroom Kingdom cruft. 
