This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Weak keep and rewrite - The article is poorly written, but I like the concept of conflating the geographic region with the Simpsons characters. --Naughtius MaximusF@HWoof! MeowMUN 14:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
delete. a section of random followed by a section of simpsons-cruft. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. It's not completely random, though, is it? Historical region overlapping parts of Belgium, France & Germany and all that. However, it is dull regioncruft bollocks followed by a bit about Ned Flanders. And it's not funny. --UU - natter11:18, Aug 27
Delete - I also like the concept of conflating the geographic region with the Simpsons character, but the first step in writing that article would be to erase absolutely everything in this article. pillow talk 15:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep. - I often back up on a five inch floppy — SirSycamore (talk) 13:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Rewrite or fix, I think. We should definitely have an article on these, and the pictures should probably be kept around. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 20:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
delete. Eh, it's fixable. --UU - natter11:14, Aug 27
Keep/me slaps UU with a wet kipper...MrNFork you! 22:37, Aug 27
Delete
delete. random, pointless. plus, john travolta uses them! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:52, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Horrible. I vote for starting completely over. At the very least, give it a hard rewrite tag. pillow talk 22:44, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Weak keep - yes, it's all over the place, and incoherent, but take any two sentences out of it and they're kind of amusing. pillow talk 17:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Weak keep. I've looked at it three times, and while I'm not keen on it, I'm not too bothered about it being deleted either. A real "meh" thing then, hence this vote. Needs work. Lots of work. --UU - natter10:54, Aug 26
delete. listy. not linked from the mainspace. do we really need an article about a weird al song? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Sigh - Nothing wrong with an article about a Weird Al song if it does any more than just repeat Weird Al's jokes... pillow talk 17:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete - Hey, all my articles have just been repeated Weird Al jokes. It's just that no one's noticed yet. They're really obscure songs. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Oh dear. Totally uninspired. --UU - natter11:12, Aug 26
Comments
Pneumonia (band)
Keep
Delete
delete. stubby bandcruft. not linked from mainspace, won't be missed. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:25, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete - I'm not sure I'd call it bandcruft, as it doesn't seem to be about a real band, but I know I wouldn't call it funny. pillow talk 17:32, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Weak keep - I did find it pretty damn funny that after one year, the pet rock was inexplicably Bruce Lee, and then was a pet rock again. Obviously this needs work, but I think it can stay. pillow talk 17:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Aw... Just for the picture sequences. The text is terrible, but the pictures were amusing. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Delightfully absurd I think some are missing the point it is an admittedly mediocre parody of those Nintendo Petz games that are pretty crap. Listy but still fun. --SirDJ~Irreverent 11:05, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep. I like the idea. Needs work, and a brutal list-ectomy, but this one can be saved. Reminds me of Amiga classic Sim Brick. --UU - natter11:10, Aug 26
Delete
delete. terrible formatting, barely any content. one overused joke: pet rocks are boring. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
keep. The images/captions are pretty good, and with a good rewrite/fix this could be notably improved. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 17:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep. A bit of judicious pruning, and this could be OK. --UU - natter10:58, Aug 26
Delete
delete. random unit nonsense. abandoned by author. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:50, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
delete. a list of numbers and the totally cool stuff that goes with them!!! lame. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
delete - although, to its credit, it did teach me that my mouth is one of my privates. pillow talk 14:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
delete I guess I should start covering my mouth. It's naughty. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
D1337 In that case, my mouth will be open even more than usual... Chocolate Rain 02:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
It's a shame, as weak as this article it is, I think it should not be deleted, just because you have never heard of a topic it does not mean that it should be deleted. — SirSycamore (talk) 14:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
I know what the topic is, but due to the poor execution, it'd probably be better to have a full reboot. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 14:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
i am well versed in numerology, as i have both seen and read The Da Vinci Code, but i feel that this article should be deleted on the grounds that it is really, really weak. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete - I don't really think this is particularly "biased" - what it is, is one of those stupid Uncyclopedia articles that reports on the fact that something comedic exists. We've deleted articles reporting the existence of Dave Chappelle jokes, articles reporting the existence Simpsons jokes, articles reporting the existence of Kevin Spacey movies, articles reporting the existence of other articles on the site. This is an article reporting the existence of a Howard Stern joke. Great. pillow talk 17:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete We have too many different maintenance templates and categories. To me, this performs exactly the same function as Category:Rewrite. I see no point in having both, it's best to have things in one place. MrNFork you! 23:31, Aug 24
Delete - empty category. Has sat empty for a year and a half. Is unnecessary. Yes, let's kill it. pillow talk 21:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Template:NoIdea
Keep
Delete
Delete We have too many different maintenance templates and categories. To me, this performs exactly the same function as {{Rewrite}}. I see no point in having both, it's best to have things in one place. MrNFork you! 23:31, Aug 24
keep. hard rewrite. the content is terrible, but i can't vote to delete anything with a RadX image. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
keep. hard rewrite or request. I've heard this show is good and I'm sure that somebody could write a nice article on it, especially using the RadX image as inspiration. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 00:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep - this actually cracks me up. I don't watch "NUMB3RS", but I think this is a pretty funny article. pillow talk 21:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
I guess Category:Rewrite could be used for this. Check out the text at the top of the category page. I'm trying to limit what's in the category to more notable things rather than fictional and less well known stuff, and maybe I dropped the ball on this one. I did not know it was a real show. My Bad. MrNFork you! 23:25, Aug 23
NUMB3RS is well-known. Well-known enough, anyway. --monika 00:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete: I was going to say it's a decent concept, but with that FA already in there, this is useless. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 20:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Now, I may just be a simple country peasant, but have we ever really deleted unnewses before? Every time I vote on VFD I get banned (plz don't ban me srz) Le Cejak•<4:30, 24 Aug 2008>
There's nothing that really says we can't, and I've seen a few come through here before. It's not as conventional, but it's just as "legal," as far as I can tell. -RAHB 04:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
It has a great concept, give the author a chance to expand on it a bit.. --MeatLoafFan 03:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
A bad, bad, little UnNews that is short and very stupid. ~ Readmesoon
Comments
Dude, No Read UN:DP. This was created what? 21 mins before your nomination. Also, calling an authors work "stupid" is not acceptable behaviour, especially when that author is obviously still around. Don't be stupid, stupid. MrNFork you! 03:51, Aug 25
Sorry about that. I just read it and went "yech", so I nommed it without minding that rule. I'll take off the tag and remove this later. ~ Readmesoon
Nomination closed. Invalid. -RAHB 04:19, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
K33P You no like boners? SireMethamphetamine SMOKE METH! 15:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep: Although maybe a trim could be used, unless the George Lucas and Civil War parts are absolutely vital to the article? --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 17:39, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete.The Chinese marketing bit is sort of clever but most of the article is nonsensical and not very good. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. Me no like listcruft (recipe, street names) and randomcruft (krypton, doberman, George Lucas, The Civil War, the majority of the page's content). The entire page is one big boner.
Delete. - Mostly a 2006 Stub the orginal author inactive and the page has had no prgress made, just crap — SirSycamore (talk) 14:04, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Smoke it - I'm surprised it didn't have an ICU tag. SireMethamphetamine SMOKE METH! 15:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Hang on This is not just an internet thing. This has been around years. OK, it's a stub, but for me it's noteworthy and has enough potential to be useful. Nuff said. MrNFork you! 09:27, Aug 22
Hm. I enjoy it somewhat, but it could use some potential work. As is, I guess it's alright. It's not great, but it's worth keeping. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep ZB made me see the light, tis a stub but a pretty decent stub --SirDJ~Irreverent 04:18, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Weak Delete. Need we an article on every pathetic internet slang word? Actually this one has a pretty decent idea. --SirDJ~Irreverent 12:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete; First off, let me point out that the fact that somebody would nominate something that they only feel "weak" about deleting is a bit perturbing. Also, the fact that somebody would call a word that Stan Lee has been using since the 60s "internet slang" a bit perturbing. But, while I'm pretty damn perturbed at that moment, this article is also crap. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 02:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
I'm going to point out that a very similar article RTFM was featured. Someone else can feel free to point out that it was featured in March freakin' 2005. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep these patent nonsense trousers! The-Real-Syko 20:07, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Dilute. I'm on the fence as to whether to delete Gondola Of Death (with a capital O in "of"). But this one is absolute pants. Pants, pants, pants, pants, pants. Pants. pillow talk 18:54, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete But Gondola is a funny word. I was kind of hoping I would get to read it a few times in the article. Maybe next time. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:15, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
D1337 While I indeed enjoy the word "Gondola", this page has to go. Chocolate Rain 02:15, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Smoke it What the fuck does pasta have to do with it? SireMethamphetamine SMOKE METH! 15:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Steady on Look at this. Lots of edits eh? I wonder why... Also, I also see no point in starting this article again. MrNFork you! 09:30, Aug 22
Rewrite - the idea of a ROFL copter is interesting but incomplete. Simsilikesims 02:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Look at the stars thingy on the left. Now look at the number of people who've voted on the poll that's at the bottom of the page. That's a stupid number of people who don't mind the page. Your petty "delete" votes have little power over their superior superiority. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Abstain - I really enjoyed those ludicrious gifs. Obviously they weren't original, but they were fun. I don't know. I kind of want to vote keep, but I have no basis for such a vote. pillow talk 19:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
No, they were shit. Seriously, I enjoy randomness but this is a fail on epic proportions... but anything new will be just as crap. --SirDJ~Irreverent 15:34, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Oh, I don't know, I think I could write a pretty amusing stub about how Internet users develop a condition where even a bad pun will cause them to fall out of their chair, roll around on the floor, and laugh - and yet, somehow, communicate that they are doing that. pillow talk 18:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Abstain (ZOHMAFUKINGAWDZ!! MAH FIRST ABSTAIN!!1!11) Per Hyperbole. Chocolate Rain 23:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Delort. I was considering nominating this one awhile ago. I'm not sure why I didn't, it isn't that much different from the others. --Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:32, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Baleet Til somebody can write a good one. Looks like that could take a while. The-Real-Syko 18:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
delete. Yea, I had a look through the history and could not find much... MrNFork you! 18:29, Aug 22
Delete. Why do we have so many shite articles about characters from video games? pillow talk 18:55, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
If he can fuck, he can fuck off. Eh? Eh?SireMethamphetamine SMOKE METH! 18:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
delete: We had a massive Sonic cleansing not too long ago, I'm surprised this didn't get caught then... or was it a recreate? Either way, delete. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
King of the Internet
Keep
Delete
delete. old, very vandalized, short, random. also, andy richter. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:41, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete Now this the kind of thing I want to see on VFD. Delete per Sycamore. MrNFork you! 18:24, Aug 22
ZZZ Reads like the beginning of a pre-teen's story. Simsilikesims 01:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Comment Well that's not fair, I wrote way better than that in 4th grade... Chocolate Rain 02:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
D1337 Is crap. Chocolate Rain 02:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Silverlake
Keep
Delete
Delete I was linkifying this to get rid of the deadend template, then I realized it's just a town cruft article with some ranting in it. -RAHB 09:09, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I haven't seen the movie K-PAX, so I don't know how many of these jokes were lifted straight out of Kevin Spacey's mouth, or whether this is a satire of the movie, or what. But I don't see anything funny in it, either way. It looks more like a coherent and interesting concept for a sci-fi movie than an Uncyclopedia article. Which is probably because it was a coherent and interesting concept for a sci-fi movie. pillow talk 17:06, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Pretty much verbatim from the movie, from what I can remember. Not a bad film, as I recall. As an article, however, it is unfunny and pretty pointless because of the aforementioned verbatim nature of it. --UU - natter21:04, Aug 21
Delete I like the poll, but there's too much Chuck Norris and a Norrisectomy wouldn't leave much worth keeping. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 16:56, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's in a bad state, but I rather like a lot of the stuff in here. Perhaps a rewrite would work better. Hell, I think I'll add it to my rewrite list even. -RAHB 06:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I actually had to Google this one to find out what it really meant. Anyway, both it and this article are pretty terrible. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:30, 21 August 2008 (UTC)