This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Delete. OK, it's essentially a spork of the WP Lord of the Rings article, with "Rings" changed for "Sweet buttery peice of toast". Oh, and other names also changed for other things. And that's essentially it. Gets more random and redlinky as it progresses, and is utterly hatstand. For all I know this could be lauded as one of the greatest things ever on ?pedia. --UU - natter21:17, Aug 21
Hey, I see an opportunity to economize. Instead of filling our database with nine thousand red links, we can cut that down to just one: The Brave Little Toaster. pillow talk 21:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
D1337 This should be used as an enforcer of the policy for no broken links...it's all just one red blur. Chocolate Rain 23:05, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete: This is a great copy and paste from Wikipedia. Seriously, how do people do it? They just copy, paste, and then make shitty jokes. Then they think that everyone will want to write spinoffs, so they put in as many redlinks as possible. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 00:25, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
delete. the whole article might as well be one giant redlink. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 01:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
1+1=2
Keep
Delete
Delete. So you know all the template:math stuff Gerry's been popping on here? This isn't even on that. It's short, unfunny, and not linked from anything. So can we wave it goodbye please? --UU - natter11:10, Aug 21
Delete. If someone would do an article on 12=3, I'd be happy. If anyone gets that reference without Google, I'd be happier. But as for this, random math formulas just aren't funny. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
WWE World Heavyweight Championship
Keep
Delete
Delete. Wrestlingcruft. Of the listy, unfunny kind. Oh, and not linked from anywhere. Even other wrestling articles. So it won't be missed. --UU - natter11:10, Aug 21 --UU - natter11:10, Aug 21
Delete. It's about WWE - ergo, no merit regardless of how good it is. Though even ignoring my prejudice I still say delete. Rt Hon W E Gladstone MP GOM | Converse | 11:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Very delete. I'm really not sure how such an article could be funny. One could make a joke about how she somehow needed to be saved nineteen times in eight different time periods... but... such a joke would not carry the article. Huh. Well, that's beside the point. This article sucks. pillow talk 07:33, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I'm sure there's possibilities for a funny Zelda article. This is some considerable distance from being it. Unfunny, the obvious sexcruft stuff, and generally a bit of a mess. --UU - natter08:58, Aug 21
Rewrite. It's not an inherently bad concept - and it'll no doubt get recreated, and be little better than currently. Rt Hon W E Gladstone MP GOM | Converse | 11:22, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Hawk Harrelson
Keep
Delete
Delete Despite the rewrite tag, this hasn't been touched since October. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:05, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep - it makes me chortle. Yes, there are vanity problems, but I think the policy is that chortling beats vanity, vanity beats scissors, and nothing beats rock. A move to userspace would be okay. A move to Cajek's userspace would be even better. pillow talk 18:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
weak keep. type in virtually any username into the search bar and you'll find some vanity in the mainspace. also, i think cajek should be the one to decide what to do with this. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep. So hang on - Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal is undoubtedly about an Uncyc user, and yet is featured. This is undoubtedly about an Uncyc user and is up for deletion? Not sure about that one. This isn't feature funny, but I don't think it's delete bad. --UU - natter08:46, Aug 21
Keep Just cause it's true doesn't mean it shouldn't be here. I like articles that tell the truth but are also funny. This is funny and factual. And quit making me come back to vote! I want to be on vacation till at least Sep. 1st! --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 20:40, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
While I do realize that this article was created yesterday, and, therefore, should probably be tagged with an {{ICU}} rather than a {{VFD}}, it has, in that time, been nominated for and failed VFH. Therefore, I feel that we should probably hold it up for VFD, instead of giving its currently infibanned creator 7 days to fix it. While this poem's poetic nature is completely debatable, its vanity nature is not. This should have been deleted on sight. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 17:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete I just discovered he's not actually particularity gay. Well, a little bit obviously, but not enough to warrant an article. MrNFork you! 17:57, Aug 20
Delete 'cause its vanity, and vanity are bad. •••Necropaxx(T){~} 22:10, Aug 20
Vanity, and shouldn't have bothered with the vote, really. •Spang•☃•talk• 23:17, 20 Aug 2008
Delete. I peed on it - t'were naff. And anyway, I very much doubt Codeine's Mom has heard of Cajek, so vanity as well. Rt Hon W E Gladstone MP GOM | Converse | 11:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Hyperbole: Check out this... MrNFork you! 18:47, Aug 20
Cool... right on. Now let's just see how well it works... pillow talk 19:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
BTW, I didn't make this!! Why should my userpage get cursed with this? Le Cejak•<19:49, 20 Aug 2008>
...because you might be gay? pillow talk 19:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
If I was an admin I'd joke ban you right now Le Cejak•<19:51, 20 Aug 2008>
Abstain: As it's been said, Cajek should be the key vote in deciding whether to keep this or not. Hopefully, he'll say just move to his mainspace. Personally, I'd be honored if someone wrote an article about how much I suck. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
I really do like people writing about me, but Abstain. because I don't want to seem like I think I'm a big deal, no matter how much I really am... oh shit! I promised myself I wouldn't type thatLe Cejak•<21:28, 20 Aug 2008>
Great... there's an underlying consensus that Cajek gets to decide the fate of this article, and he abstains. Dick. pillow talk 23:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Opinion I think the only problem here is it uses Cajek instead of "he" or something generic, the quality isn't the issue and thus should be userspaced. --SirDJ~Irreverent 12:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Only problem is, the original writer has been infinibanned for sockpuppets. Userspacing would be pointless in this case. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Amused. Needs work, but pretty funny concept, and the execution, while worse than good, is better than awful. pillow talk 19:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
NOTE: I cleaned up the prose on this thing. Maybe some of you delete-voters would like to take a second glance? pillow talk 04:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Eh, raised a weak smile. --UU - natter08:39, Aug 21
Weak Keep. After Hyperbole's revisions, it definitely reads better. I would suggest an expand tag, but I can't see it going much further than it is. It's just going to have to stay stubby. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 00:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Looks like mostly vanity. Other than that, there's no funny, and it's short and ugly. -RAHB 13:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. It's a cute idea, but I think it should probably RIP until someone has a really fantastic idea on it. Since the entire concept is communicated in the title, it could just be put in as a requested article. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep. It's fine. It's at least as good as, if not better than, the derivative Britney article. pillow talk 04:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep I agree with Zombiebaron, but I agree with Hyperbole. Heck, I agree with everyone! Agreement hug! --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!)
Keep. I agree with me. Who says this is good. And Enzo Aquarius on this article's talk page, who also quite likes it. I don't agree with Taco Wiz. Come up with your own idea for an UnNews next time dude. --UU - natter08:53, Aug 21
Keep Not that it impressed me all that much, but it's certainly a solid article, and not crap. -RAHB 09:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
strong keep. i thought this was rather well done, so i checked the history...it's a THE classic! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
What the shit Rather good, even if I don't know who the fuck she is --SirDJ~Irreverent 13:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. This article isn't funny at all until the very end, where Miley Cyrus insults the reporters for not covering important stories. My new article, UnNews:Britney Spears Yawns, is much funnier. Plus, Miley Cyrus isn't covered nearly as much as Britney Spears, so the satire isn't as sharp. Taco Wiz 04:06, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
I mean, the article is stupid, but why delete some old UnNews that nobody cares about anyway? There is no point in putting ICU/NRVs on UnNewses or putting them up for deletion because soon enough everyone will forget about them forever. Seriously. And Taco, by the way, I think you just realized that there was some article dangerously similar to yours and wanted it gone. And, I took your article out of the Recent UnNews because you this was your first UnNews, and it wasn't too sharp. It took me twenty before I started putting my articles on there. I just had to refine my skills. Don't rush to put your articles on the template, just hone your skills and then feel free. As for now, don't do it. ~ Readmesoon
Thanks for the input Readmesoon. I, however, don't really see where your opinion on this matter comes from. Nowhere does it say that only experienced users can put their articles onto the the RecentNews and RecentArticle templates. In fact, I think more people should put their articles on those templates, but they don't know that those templates exist. So, how about in the future, when you decide to start enforcing made up policies, you consider the second rule first. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 05:05, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, I think the policy is that, since we don't have a feature system for UnNews, editors are encouraged to take articles out of the template if they think they suck. No? pillow talk 07:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Not really. Unless it's complete and utter rubbish (one liner/OMFG GAYZ/etc) we shouldn't take anything out, everyone has a place here and everyone has the same editorial rights as everyone else.~ 12:25, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
I have seen quite a few UnNews removed from the template by various people over the months I have been around. I for one thought that it was normal practice for people to keep an eye on what was there, and remove as they saw fit. Maybe this point needs further discussion or clarification? MrNFork you! 13:58, Aug 21
As most things here, I'd say common sense. If it's not horrendously bad, let it be. I don't see anything bad with a noob trying to publicize his/hers Unnews bit. It's not different from the recent articles part. We don't need yet another set of rules. ~ 14:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Just for the record, I really don't like the concept that it takes hours and hours of work, followed by a sometimes-month-long VFH process, to get on the front page... unless you're writing in the UnNews space. Then it just has to be "not horrendously bad." When I've mentioned this before, I've got the answer "Oh, we just informally police the template to keep it high-quality." Now I'm being told that we don't and shouldn't do that. pillow talk 14:42, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Remember the days when you were new here? Would you like a fellow editor, who is not an admin, to remove something you were so happy that got two lines, which is nothing like a feature, on the first page, just because you're new and your not up to some of the users' standards? Personally I don't like imposing strict codes of what some people consider to be quality writing (again, not referring to the obvious crap) because a. the front page is not a holy temple b.this site is not about VFH and c.humor is subjective. For this specific case, I'd discuss it with the writer on his talk page, and make some suggestions regarding the article - and not remove his entry just because I think he's not good enough. Again, Recent Unnews is like recent articles, it has no official status for all parties who find it offensive. ~ 15:51, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Kept. Voting closed. ~ 17:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Metalinka
Keep
Delete
Delete. A list of Metallica songs altered to include references to Legend of Zelda. Get it, eh, eh? Not odiously bad as a lot of VFD stuff, just a really weak concept and a lot of dumb puns.--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
D1337 Per above. Chocolate Rain 02:04, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Mostly just lists. Without them, what's left doesn't amount to a whole lot. Someone had fun with the album covers, mind. --UU - natter08:48, Aug 21
Emphatic delete. Unlike MrN, I think the fact that this is a pre-existing meme makes this crappy article even worse. pillow talk 19:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep Where's your collective soul, guys? Don't tell me that you (the proverbial you) have never wondered as a child what the largest number in the world is? Although just a stub, this article takes that childlike wonderment in another direction. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Weak keep. Stubby, but kinda makes sense. Needs work, but I don't think it's deletion material. --UU - natter15:05, Aug 19
Cute if you read it --SirDJ~Irreverent 13:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
delete. Looks like rubbish to me. MrNFork you! 16:17, Aug 19
Comments
Abstain - I can't decide either way, as Syndrome might be right again. I'm definately moving it to Illogicopedia though. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 09:34, Aug. 19, 2008
Abstain as I really don't care. pillow talk 20:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. It's too bad. A lot of work went into this. Some pretty bright Uncyclopedians wrote many, many words. The prose is good. The formatting is fine. There are not many annoying memes, and absolutely no gay or penis jokes. And yet, somehow, it still sucks. pillow talk 19:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Sometimes, even the most talented of comedians have trouble writing about a specific subject. This may just be one of those topics that just isn't really funny. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's not bad, but a lot of this probably isn't original. If someone can show me a site this was copied from or something, I'll change my vote to delete. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 17:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
delete. do we really need all this erroneous math? i say 'no'. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:46, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete While clever, this is not comedy. Wrong wiki. pillow talk 19:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete I've seen that 1=2 proof everywhere. Not only is it wrong, but it's been forwarded to me like, seven times. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
D1337 Goddamn math articles... Chocolate Rain 02:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
syc, i've seen these equations before, and way before 2005 (site creation). they are basically all the same thing (divide by zero, negative ln), rewritten a different way. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete There's some appreciable irony in trying to write about Laplace transformations when you have no idea what they are, but no, this just sucks. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 17:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Weak delete - almost good enough to be worth keeping. Almost. pillow talk 19:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete- I have nothing to say about this one, but I'm going to type a large sentence that no one'll read to make it look like I'm informed and I have some good points. Also, puppies. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
It doesn't matter what your answer is so long as you feel good about it math
Keep
I don't know why but I really like this one. Slap a rewrite tag on it and keep --monika 18:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
delete. survived VFD in '05 and '06, but has, if anything, gotten worse since then. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete unless Monika personally volunteers to fix it. Because, frankly, this is more angry political screed than comedy article, and I hate those. Hate, hate, hate, hat. pillow talk 19:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
monika Check out the text at the top of Category:Rewrite. If this is kept, it's probably more suitable for {{fix}} than rewrite. Maybe {{idea}} if you think it's a really good idea. MrNFork you! 19:02, Aug 20
By "a rewrite tag" I didn't mean "the rewrite tag". Sorry for the confusion. --monika 19:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
It's basic concept isn't bad, but if the title was changed to "It doesn't matter what your answer is so long as you feel good about it", it could be treated in a wider context, with more potential for good humour. Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Sex and the city
Keep
Delete
Delete Rambly, short, and no real direction. Ugly as well. -RAHB 13:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete - Surely we can do better than this. pillow talk 19:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete - Yeah, we definitely can. Someone out there has to have a lot of good ideas for this article, I mean, it is a pretty popular TV show. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Gne
Keep
Delete
Delete School cruft. -RAHB 13:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep I'm not going to argue that this is a masterpiece in flawed logic and should be cherished, but I think deletion is a little harsh. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 17:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep Not that great, but it's decent enough to live. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep I definitely liked it. I never thought about it before, but it is just as impossible to divide by 1 as it is to divide by 0. pillow talk 19:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
delete. lame, breaks down into monty python references at the end. hooray! VFD is full! we are awesome! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:20, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete A teeming mass of IPcruft since its creation in 2005. I get a headache going through the history and trying to find a good version to revert to. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 06:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. What Gerry said. --UU - natter07:16, Aug 20
Comments
Moomin
Keep
week keep Maybe it's because I know what a Moomin is that I don't see any reason why this needs to be deleted. It's not the best article in the world, but there's some room between VFD and VFH. --monika 16:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Random and so forth. --UU - natter14:53, Aug 19
Flush Transwikied to fiction.wikia.com - more like a story than comedy. Simsilikesims 00:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Comment @ Simsilikesims I'm not familiar with that wiki, but are you sure that's appropriate, considering that the article is a fake article about a preexisting fictional race? --monika 01:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
That wiki is for fictional and including fantasy stories. A short documentary on a fictional race seems like fiction to me. Simsilikesims 02:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Okay, the concept wasnt original, guess I'll have to mark the article fan fiction. Not sure if it fits in the genre of humor stories yet though. I didnt know they preexisted. Simsilikesims 02:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep I like it, even though it has some errors. They neglected to prove that the sums are convergent, they didn't consider the case n=4, etc. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 03:38, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Dull, reads like a WP spork. Created then abandoned, no edits since. Only linked to from here, so not loved. Won't be missed. --UU - natter14:01, Aug 19
Keep I ask that the VFDing admin hold off on deleting this until we get the input of someone who has studied physics. Some of this is pretty amusing. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep - Syndrome makes a compelling argument. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 09:32, Aug. 19, 2008
KeepThe article serves a chance at a rewrite and its not offending stupid as is. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 13:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep & soft rewrite tag. I don't hate it. --monika 14:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
delete. i'm pretty sure we don't need this. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
delete. Though for some reason, I feel like the title could have a good article from it in the hands of someone who knew what they were doing. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 22:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
i'm a physics major. the formulas are probably real, but the rest is bollocks. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Wait... If you're a physics major, why aren't you rewriting them? ::scratch head:: --monika 14:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
i'm rewriting the ones worth keeping. i'm nomming the ones i'm pretty sure aren't worth keeping. if a jury of my peers decides that the ones i don't think are worth keeping are in fact worth keeping, then i see what i can do with them. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
delete. after reading it, i went back through and looked only at the links. talk about namedropping. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:08, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Weak keep. Apparently the guy is notable, I just checked, and he actually has an entry on wikipedia. Might be funny to fans. Simsilikesims 02:04, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Not that bad. A list-ectomy might help it, but it's not awful. And being from Sheffield is a serious medical problem. Doctors are decades from a cure. --UU - natter09:21, Aug 18
Delete. I saw some idiot vandalize this, and after another user and I reverted it, I removed the quotes as well. Then I realized the whole article sucks. Also, who? --Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 23:46, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
delete i say. also, the talk page makes my head hurt. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
delete. Look at the talk page. It's got a few funny bits, but not enough. --Mr. MonkeyPant-hoot here. 21:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Yikes I fixed the talk page of this article to list the unsigned IPs who were arguing and complaining about the article.Simsilikesims 17:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Base...ball - surly it is some foreign evil...— SirSycamore (talk) 09:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Remington Steelers
Keep
Keep or else I'm going to have to contact Wikia and ask them to create a Wiki dedicated to this fad I created, or at the very least I'm going to move it to my userspace. I put a lot of work into this, and I hate to see it go. --Ryanasaurus0077 23:47, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Listen. I'm really sorry. I can tell when someone spends a lot of time on an article (mostly by that handy "history" tab thing). But the fact is, it's nothing but randomness and namedropping, and more namedropping, and Cookie Monster, and some more namedropping. In fact, I think it invents a whole new brand of antihumor - songdropping. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 21:55 Aug 17, 2008
Delete I feel bad about it. I really do. This guy's put a lot of work into his little series here. The problem is, it defies the purpose of Uncyclopedia entirely. It's just information about a band that doesn't exist. But it's written like any old article on Wikipedia would be written if the band did exist. The whole "series" is like that. I don't think it should be obliterated from the face of the earth, I just think the author should take his endeavors elsewhere, form a website or something devoted to this whole thing, because this just isn't what Uncyclopedia is for. -RAHB 22:26, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Ryan: If Wikia accepts the wiki request, I think it would be an excellent idea for you to pursue. -RAHB 00:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
RAHB: If Wikia accepts the wiki request, I'm asking you to sign up for the new Wiki and contribute to it. --Ryanasaurus0077 00:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Can't argue with that I suppose. I have a wikia account so I won't really have to re-register at all. -RAHB 00:27, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
The huge washing machine of the cosmos
Keep
Delete
Delete. - little progress made over time, nonsense, shite, trash etc— SirSycamore (talk) 20:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Wow, 
UnPoetia:Cajek Might Be Gay
Abstain. because I don't want to seem like I think I'm a big deal, no matter how much I really am... oh shit! I promised myself I wouldn't type that 
Keep. --
