This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Duck It's a bouncer of a cricket type joke thing... Unlike this article which is just a load of people saying what they think of particular players, with some random thrown in for no apparent reason. MrNFork you! 20:53, May 11
Delete - I would normally suggest we remove the lists, but that would leave nothing here. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 06:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. The umpire slowly raises his finger of doom and sends this big list o'nothing back to the pavilion etc etc. Unfunny and so forth. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee08:39, May 12
Delete. An ugly, humourless exercise in fail. -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Meh. I just read the thing and it sucks. This is the result of many peoples' opinions on players not really gelling. Having said that, I liked the Bush pic.-- HindleyiteConverse 13:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
WTF? - No seriously. It's so stupid it's almost awesome. My first instinct was to move it to Illogicopedia, but Hindleyite's already covering it. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 16:26, May. 12, 2008
Comments
Some of my favourite jokes on the site used to be in this article. Sadly I cannot be bothered weeding out the crap any more. Mostly it's the Asian players that need vetting - maybe us Westerners don't have the same sense of humour. As such, I would like to hear from an Indian/Sri Lankan/Bangladeshi etc. on this matter before it is deleted. In reality though, I can see this being deleted anyway. Meh, I'll transwiki it to Illogic, I think. -- HindleyiteConverse 12:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Gerard Way
Keep
Delete
Not want – I put a {{Fix}} on this page awhile back in some weird optimistic fit. Its probably gotten worse since then. And that's pretty hard. Because it was crap before. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 19:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete No arguments from me (for a change). Although it's not super fan cruft, there is no real point or concept to this article. It's mostly just a load of opinion about the dude, with little attempt at being funny. There are a few links here however, so we could use a decent redirect if it's deleted. MrNFork you! 20:45, May 11
Delete - Crap in most respects. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 06:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I reviewed this a little while back. I tried to give plenty of pointers, but they don't seem to have been followed. It's got the usual bandcrufty stuff throughout, and it's not funny. Redirect to My Chemical Romance. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee08:26, May 12
Keep As articles written in a style related to what they are about it kinda like this. The text itself is not really that important, and I actually think this works best as a short stub. MrNFork you! 13:49, May 11
Delete. There's possibilities for an interesting article from Hermetic, I suppose, but this odd little article doesn't even notice them and runs head on into nowhere. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee10:21, May 11
Delete - KFC cuts off their heads, rips off their feathers, dips them in batter, and you want me to say "God bless this meal"? No, no, no, no. Not God bless this meal. God DAMN this meal! --Kip > Talk•Works•• 16:40, May. 12, 2008
Comments
20th Anniversary
Keep
Delete
Delete Short, not funny stub. MrNFork you! 10:58, May 10
Delete. Only really one recurring joke, which is not really that funny, and does not justify an article. Also, not an article anyway. MrNFork you! 01:48, May 9
Delete. Sigh. Really nice picture of kitten submerged in soup. The article needs so much work it is probably unsalvageable. ----OEJ 15:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete [[Image:Wiki kittensoup1.jpg]] is the only thing redeemable from el listo --SirDJ~Irreverent 09:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Lionel Messi
Keep
Delete
Has been irredeemable crap since December 20 2005. Let's just take it out behind the shed already. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 01:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete That lasted a while... MrNFork you! 01:35, May 9
Delete. - Random who? --MidwayHaven 07:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Notable, I suppose, but this article is kinda random, with lots of 300 references, and no funny. Mind you, that's quite a lengthy gif there. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee08:04, May 8
Delete. Too bad. I really am very much in favor of undermining the dominance of Brit / American point-of-view articles on Uncyc. This one, however, is really quite badly written. ----OEJ 01:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Could hack it back, but just not enough in there to be worth keeping. MrNFork you! 01:44, May 9
Delete. - I found this with a VFD template on, but no entry on VFD. I assume someone just forgot to add it. Besides it's crap and mainly a list (Bonner) (Talk) May 7, 08:50
Delete. Short. Listy. One of the lists is a really original and really funny fight club rip-off. Dull. Lame. Pointless. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee08:01, May 8
Delete. Yes, yes it is... MrNFork you! 01:41, May 9
Delete. That was me who put the template on. After I put the template on I got called away to do something pointless and forgot what I was doing when I came back. Sorry. YouFang 18:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Random, namedroppy, unfunny, bad idea badly executed and more reasons I can't be bothered to type. Get rid. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee07:55, May 8
Delete. Lame namedroppy crap. Not even clever randomness. --SirDJ~Irreverent 10:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I'm pre-confused. It saves sooo much time. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 15:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Yeah, you do wonder for a few seconds if there is a clever, intentional point to this, but no, it just stays crap the whole way through. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee07:54, May 8
Comment.Don't forget your templates. This is the second one I had to add today. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Heihachi
Keep
Surprise Keep Obviously not awesome, but I actually think it is reasonable enough to keep. It's not written as a fans article, and I rather like the style it uses. Also, as one of my fav games for a while, I'm not biased I'm sure... MrNFork you! 14:00, May 6
Delete
TekkencruftThis page deserve to burn in hell. --Dark Paladin X 02:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. The HowTo namespace is a magnet for mediocrity. I, meanwhile, am a magnet for chunky broads with bad teeth and greasy hair. I've said too much. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 15:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. How to "arson"? ARSON is not a verb. It just is NOT! ----OEJ 00:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I think my favourite thing about this page is the name of its creator - Combat Wombat. The page, however, isn't funny, plus it raised my hackles the same way it did OEJ's. Get rid. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee07:52, May 8
Keep Maybe I should stop voting for the day, cos this just looks like a semi reasonable (if a short) article. Not super funny, but puts across one particular view of things in a rather nice style so why not hang onto it... MrNFork you! 14:05, May 6
Keep Too many lines in there which I liked to delete this outright. Can we not have both? MrNFork you! 04:07, May 4
Keep. Meh, I thought it had some redeeming value - certainly enough to justify the rewrite tag that's on it. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee15:51, May 4
Keep - Some good stuff. Just needs a cleanup. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 06:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
I have put {{whoops}} on Democracy and Democrazy in an attempt to "reconcile" the articles; they don't look easily mergeable, but nor is there a consensus for deletion yet. --Pentium5dot1 22:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Kept. ~ 08:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
HowTo:Headbutt the Pavement
Keep
Delete
Delete now that failed at being funny or satirical... the "HowTo:do really stupid things" idea has been covered nicely here --SirDJ~Irreverent 13:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete Not great. Also, don't forget your VFD tags DJ! MrNFork you! 00:09, May 6
Delete. Quite badly written, as Under_user noted. ----OEJ 00:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Radium
Keep
Delete
Delete. This had a VFD tag but never made it to the voting page. It should be here though. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I added that tag. I don't recall why I never put this on VFD - it clearly deserves to be here. Thanks, CMC. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee08:31, May 5
Delete. Nothing worth saving. MrNFork you! 13:19, May 6
Delete. Randomly stupid. ----OEJ 00:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Comment.Thank goodness, I was afraid the Randomcruft Illuminati had you assassinated before you could finish the VFD nomination. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Blendar The Barbarian
Keep
Delete
Will it Blend? There's nothing here. Nuthin'!--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Bad idea, short, listy, no funny, and not touched since 2006. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee08:27, May 5
Delete the idea was so random and the page was so suck --SirDJ~Irreverent 13:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete - Ok idea, bad in every other way. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 06:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete As per comments above. ----OEJ 00:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Alex Plank
Keep
Delete
Delete. Well, it's not really an article at all, now is it?--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Ix-nay, then redirect it to Stephen Colbert. I see no reason why we should have a page for each. I know they're different things, but the Stephen Colbert article is just so genius in the way that it incorporates the show that I feel no need to have a separate article for it which won't even be consistent with that article. If anyone out there feels like rewriting this garbage, however, be my guest. ~MinitrueSirSysRq!Talk!Sex!=/GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 01:37 May 6
Keep. It made me smile in some parts. Certainly not good enough to be an FA, but it's not deletable. I'd say just give it a listectomy and call it a day. - DonLeddytheCrunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 23:35, May 5
Mild Keep. I have no idea why this was a featured article, maybe it needs to be undone back to an earlier state but it's not too awful so I'm giving it a pass.--Count of Monkey Crisco 03:48, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
KeepJust keeps out of the delete range. Shoulda done this when STM was here, he would have re-written it to awesomeness! --SirDJ~Irreverent 07:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Weak keep. It's not good, but then, it shows how far we've come. Commit listicide on it and leave it be. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee10:04, May 6
Delete
Delete. Featured article from 2005 which should never have been featured. See the forum topic at Forum:VFH in '05 = VFD in '08 and vote delete. Give someone new a chance to rewrite this utter shite. Le Cejak•<May 05, 2008 [23:26]>
To Led: Should we get rid of the quotes too? and the cliches? and the random pictures? Le Cejak•<May 05, 2008 [23:37]>
Some of them(especially the quotes). Some of the cliches, I think, are to be anticipated, and almost hoped for, in a page like this, though. For example, I was almost hoping for a spin on the whole "no one expects yadda yadda yadda," thing. It's overdone, but it almost needs an article because of that overdone-ness. If nothing else, we can use this page to say "we have Spanish Inquisition about that already, keep it off other pages." - DonLeddytheCrunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 23:54, May 5
Comment. Maybe needs reversion to an earlier, funnier incarnation. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:48, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep I pokes fun at all the Ubuntu versions. It needs more work and needs less lists. Maybe a short description of each flavor of Ubuntu. If huffed redirect to Command Line as that is what most Ubuntu flavors end up looking like anyway, a command line that fails to load Xfree.org anyway. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 04:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep. It has something I can't quite put my finger on. Text, perhaps. •Spang•☃•talk• 02:57, 05 May 2008
Delete. It's a list, a list of Ubuntu forks. If anyone is tech savvy enough to show why tyhis is hilarious maybe I'll change my vote, bur right now it's lame.--Count of Monkey Crisco 23:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments
I think the "joke" is that there are too many new versions of Linux kicking around these days, not really that funny perhaps, but I'm and Abs on this one, as it's got some (not much) merit. MrNFork you! 01:28, May 3
Keep This was put on VFD before and it was voted to keep. IWETHEY is a famous web site for the Microsoft/SCO lawsuit against Linux. It is like Livejournal or MySpace or Digg. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 02:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's not particularly funny, but neither are a lot of things that are central to Uncyclopedia lore, such as Clinjas. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 06:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete on the grounds of listy, vanity, ugly, perjury, and very bad-y. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
*Delete I tried to find a reason to keep this, then figured out who these guys are, and gave up... MrNFork you! 02:25, May 3
Comments
On second thoughts Abs, check out how many pages link to this one... MrNFork you! 02:27, May 3
It has been in since 2005 and yes a lot of articles link to it as well as Uncyclopedia is the worst. They criticized Uncyclopedia and we made fun of them. They are a spin-off of Infoworld, many of them are from Infoword. The IWE stands for Infoworld Electric. Plus they blanked and vandalized articles here like Anonymous Slashy did so we created a special article to mock them as we did Slashy. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 02:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Old VFD vote is here: [1]. MrNFork you! 04:06, May 3
Kept. VFD special case clause 34b. •Spang•☃•talk• 02:57, 05 May 2008
Keep I get all my DVDs from this guy. Also "Knock-off Nigel" is a well know popular character in this neck of the woods, so I think it stays. MrNFork you! 18:45, May 2
Knock-off this Article Not funny, no redeeming value, and edited once since last July (a spelling edit). A complete waste of server space. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 16:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Surprised weak keep. Rewrite tag - there is far worse bandcruft out there, and there are even a few passable lines in here. A discography removal, and a swift crap-ectomy, and it should have potential. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee08:17, Apr 28
Keep Yea, there is worse than this around... MrNFork you! 17:42, Apr 29
Weak Keep - I sort of like it, for some odd reason. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 06:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
I've edited it, taken out some unfunny stuff and added in a bunch of stuff that most people probably will not find funny. When I created the article, I asked that people improve upon it, so I ask anyone who voted delete to throw in some ideas on the talk page. Becasue of conflict of interests, I won't wote here, but ask everyone to take another look. Gopherbassist 20:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete.--
Fog
Keep. Kinda cool. --
Comment. Don't forget your templates. This is the second one I had to add today. --
