This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Delete. Judging from the edit history, there appear to be races to see who can edit this article first, usually inserting some variant of penis. Judging by the lulz, they're from ED. Judging by the article, it should be deleted. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Interesting, I just expanded the edit history and noticed that the article was created yesterday, but already has well over 50 edits. It appears to have been created for the sole purpose of vandalizing it, which may not be a bad thing if it keeps the IP's that dominate the edit history away from the good articles. However, I'm not sure if that would be against the "spirit of Uncyclopedia" or even if it's allowed, so I'm leaving the nomination up to see what others think about this. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete, the "i Applicants must be Awesome, Legendary or Cake" line isn't enough to save the page from itself. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Smells like teen vanity: "Pope James XIV - 16 years old and is a student at walton high, studying biology, maths physics and Design technology"? Yeah, right. ----OEJ 20:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Throw it Back. Under the legal humor limit and comes from gibberish polluted water.--Count of Monkey Crisco 23:34, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete I liked "It is a fish that breathes air, so it has to lick the ice until it can get to the top" but that one line does not save this stub with no wiki page, and suspect Google hits... MrNFork you! 02:22, May 3
Delete Came across this when I was de-Chucking the database. I usually would just prune the damn thing, but a quick perusal (took about five minutes!) yields no redeeming value under the layers of crap. It's just a list. Treat it as such.~~SirLjlego,GUN[talk] 15:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete OK, lets have another go at this one. I could find nothing worth keeping either. MrNFork you! 18:47, May 2
Delete. I edited this a little several months ago, but it's mostly become a playground for unregistered One-Line Charlies. We're better off without it. ----OEJ 20:18, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Finding anything worthwhile in here is like finding a needle in a haystack. Get rid. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee15:25, May 4
Comments
Abstain. There's maybe a dozen good items in there but a lot of it is wasted. Would also leave a lot of redlinks if deleted. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
"It would leave a lot of redlinks if deleted" isn't really an argument against deletion (example); it just makes the task of rewriting that much more urgent. If no one has a rewrite in mind, then consider making it into a disambiguation (Explosion, Kaboom, A Splode, the relevant line of All your base are belong to us, etc.) or redirecting it somewhere. Also consider userfying if a suitable target user can be found. --Pentium5dot1 04:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Disambigd. Or however you spell it. Voting closed. ~ 16:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep because I wrote it and I think it's some of my best work. See comments below. YouFang 06:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep Personally, I try to use this page to remove crap which no one cares about. MrNFork you! 04:04, May 4
Keep A pretty decent article, if a bit random --SirDJ~Irreverent 11:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. A garbled and wacky page of changed lyrics. Not horrible, but still random, not really satirical, and (as far as I'm concerned) not really an appropriate kind of page for this site. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 03:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Comments
As I understand it, the function of VFD is to remove random garbage written by idiots that somehow manages to slip under the QVFD radar. Radiohead is not such a page. Love went into crafting it from the satirical lyrics to the parodies of Thom Yorke's art. As I understand it, love is what separates the crap from the brilliant, what whittles satire from randomness. To put it plainly, a vote to delete Radiohead is a vote against love. It's a vote for hatred. It's just what the terrorists want. (ps- I never would have thought one of my articles would ever be accused of being random!) YouFang 06:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
I hear you YouFang... Would it be possible to make this a bit more accessible to readers who are not fans of the band? It does look rather random at first glance, and perhaps you can do something about that? Please? Go on... say OK Computer? :-) MrNFork you! 16:14, May 3
Yes. The article is indeed written in the style of the liner notes for Radiohead's iconic album OK Computer. I have given the issue of accessability a lot of thought, and decided against it. In order for true satire to occur, there has to be SOME knowledge on the part of the reader. Indeed, it should be understood that somebody searching for Radiohead on the site would have enough knowledge to "get it". For the rest, there's the warning box at the start. In the past I have corrected the attempts of ignoramouses to "fix" the garbled style, and I guess I will have to weather the occasional VFD as well. sigh. You must suffer for your art.
Will give it a fix then. Voting closed. ~ 11:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
The article's pretty awesome, I don't think it even needs fixed. •Spang•☃•talk• 11:51, 04 May 2008
Delete. Terribly random, completely unfunny, and structured inadequately. It has no redeeming value, and doesn't belong on Unyclopedia. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 02:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep Just to piss off the page blanking IP. -OptyCSucks! CUN20:09, 2 May
Keep (secretly my fantasy too.) --monika 20:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep. We've been way more offensive to way more people. If anything, this page isn't offensive enough. Oh, and I laughed at the first line. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byTheLedBalloon (talk • contribs)
Wait what? Horribly random, completely unfunny, and structured like it was blown up... by itself, apparently. --SirDJ~Irreverent 14:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
BOOM! is the sound I hope is made when you delete this crap. -OptyCSucks! CUN15:17, 2 May
Delete. It's an amusing pun for a concept but there's nothing after that. P.s. added the vfd tag for you.--Count of Monkey Crisco 16:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Isiah Thomas is a kind of reptile which was discovered by British settlers in the Chicago region in the late 17th century. Nah, I don't need to read any further. -OptyCSucks! CUN15:21, 2 May
Delete. Its like someone gave a retard LSD and entered them into a "write the most random shit possible" contest. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 02:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Was this created by a random word generator? -OptyCSucks! CUN15:23, 2 May
Delete. Yeah, I came across this a day or two back, and was going to nom it myself - not quite sure why I didn't - it's crap. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee08:20, May 1
Delete. Cos it's does not even try to be funny. MrNFork you! 08:57, May 1
FAIL That like drained humor from the site... like a blackhole except the blacks weren't to blame... this time --SirDJ~Irreverent 14:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. A glance at the history shows a longer version of this, and I was just gonna revert it, but the content of the old version, allied to the fact that a swift Google for "Bede cengia" came up with nothing, makes me think there's vanity going on. Codeine's mum would be baffled, as am I. Get rid. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee16:06, Apr 30
Delete. Looks like its got a lot about Gary Glitter in there... Still, it's all pants, so get rid. MrNFork you! 08:54, May 1
Delete. Yeah!!! No. Le Cejak•<Apr 30, 2008 [15:57]>
Delete. Woo! Cajek nommed something for deletion. Way to go! It's a ranty, unfunny bit about some Oxford students who formed a protest group for the use of animals in scientific testing, for those who want to know. So, facts detected, but not funny. get rid. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee16:06, Apr 30
Delete. Not that badly written, but as UU says, this fails as the authors motives were clearly to publicise their cause, rather than actually remember to put any humour in... MrNFork you! 08:47, May 1
“Pro-Test’s founder, Lorry Driver, is a well-known kitten huffer and wacky-backy addict. He is also known to suck dick regularly in exchange for crack cocaine.”
Delete Yea, get rid. Nothing of value. MrNFork you! 08:43, May 1
Comments
Jos Vos
Keep
Delete
This article makes no sense to me. This article may be hilarious if I were familiar with whatever it pretends to explain, but I definitely have no idea what the hell is going on. If you can think of a way to get this off Uncyclopedia, make it so. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 09:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I'm with Syndrome on this one - it makes no sense, a quick Google leaves me no nearer finding out what the hell's going on, and it's unfunny and just needs to go. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee09:57, Apr 28
Delete. Vanity based on the last paragraph? MrNFork you! 18:13, Apr 29
Delete - Just a load of randomness. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 06:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Crap - Jos Verstappen perhaps? so this is Dutch/F1-cruft perhaps (Schumi = Schumacher) ? Plug a dyke with it. --SirDJ~Irreverent 14:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I followed a picture to this thing and put it on my watchlist when it was first born, planning to VFD it if it didn't go anywhere in a few weeks. It's amazing how consistently you can follow those shoop-da-whoop pictures to total crap. --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. ...wtf is this? Le Cejak•<Apr 30, 2008 [15:41]>
Delete. Even 2nd rate characters from popular 3rd rate ninja animes deserve better than this 9th rate article.--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Definitive bandcruft. Your Myspace page doesn't make you relevant. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Seems factual and therefore not in line with the goals of Uncyclopedia. Then again, I've never heard of these guys so I don't know. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 20:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. You know those articles where you see the title, think "I really don't need to read this to vote, do I?" but then go and read it because you want to be fair, and then wish you'd just followed your instinct and not wasted your time on it before voting? Yeah, this is one of those. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee07:45, Apr 30
Delete. OK, I read the bottom bit... If you're going to be insulting, be funny. Like calling Under user "American" for example. Now that would be funny. Sheesh???? MrNFork you! 18:06, Apr 29
Sheesh! It's the sound made when you cut a sheep in half. Also; delete this drivel. -OptyCSucks! CUN14:07, 30 Apr
Delete. Short, pointless in the extreme, unfunny, very little actual content - take your pick for a reason, but get rid. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee09:52, Apr 28
Keep. Er, I quite like this. It's some distance off brilliant, but I don't see deletion material here. If it goes, I'd like a copy in my userspace so that when the muse returns, I can give it the treatment. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee10:16, Apr 29
Mild Keep. Concept's solid enough, just needs a little more bulk. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Mild Keep It just needs a twisted mind to hold a knife to its throat until it shapes itself up. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 17:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Deltron. Listy and random with a number fetish. --Count of Monkey Crisco 05:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. It's like they started writing a page on uno before noticing that uno is not funny at all. At all. Do you hear me, mother? No, I'm not bringing you your soup! Yes, I was talking to a girl on the telephone! No, she's not a whore! You're the whore, mother! You're the whore! SirModusoperandiBoinc! 00:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. It is still on DPP and fully protected, so I can't add the tag, but some noob found a way to hack through the cascading protection system and wrote an article about Tila Tequila. I can't edit the page since it is protected, so I can't add the tag. Anyway, the article sucks. --Kurgan's Back. Prepare to get pwned.(Unless you are Chuck Norris) 02:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Isn't this page too new for VFD? And it's a little worrying that someone edited a protected page. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
For anyone who cares, you can still move pages to DPP-protected titles, which is what MadMax did. The creator didn't hack DPP or anything. –—Hv(talk) 27/04 11:22
OMGSOCUTE! I'd estimate about one third to one half of this article is workable material. That's enough, right? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:39, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. A bit name-droppy, but not bad, for gamecruft. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep as sometimes bollocks can look slightly better after a little trim? Hmm, maybe that's telling Cajek too much, however, I think this article is actually not doing any harm, and could have a lot of different meanings to different people... Eh? Oh hell, it's kinda funny to me I guess so... MrNFork you! 13:33, Apr 23
Delete Redemption? You are a merciful god. Sir Roger 11:01, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. This could at least have one reference to To Kill a Mockingbird, considering it is a location in the novel. Oh. And it needs to be funny. We can't forget about that. ~
Generally, I only nom those for deletion that I see no stuff worthy of a trim in. If you see redemption where I see none, well that's why we have voting! Happy to be outvoted (but not changing my vote). --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee13:48, Apr 23
Per SysRq's UN:CM issue... Was ol Tolkin not from around those west country parts? MrNFork you! 18:39, Apr 24
Kekekeke zerg rush!
Keep
Keep. I think this should be kept as part of a series on Korea. None of the Korea articles are looking too hot right now, but maybe if we group them together like we do the Canada articles, someone will take pity on them and fix them. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:48, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Probably vanity. Fails UN:CM by the Wikipedia and funny requirements, but it's the South Park image that gives it away. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep and rewrite. If you do ding it, send it to me in my personal space - there is so much that be done with this. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 20:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Got a smile out of me, but I have been called pointless myself, so maybe that does not count. Keep it or put it somewhere I say. MrNFork you! 03:22, Apr 26
Keep It's actually unencyclopedic, a rarity these days. Sir Roger 10:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep per my earlier sentiment that all of the Korea-based articles are shite (with the possible exception of North Korea), but they need love and classification like the Canada articles have. If we huffed this, we'd have to huff pretty much every other article about Korea too. And all the other articles about racialgroups that are bad. (The articles, not the groups.) --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:37, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Crap. Listcruft. Might need love, but then again, a blank canvas is probably a better start than this. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee10:30, Apr 25
Delete. Is there a way we can ban fat basement nerds who's only interaction with anything is through online games from writing anything besides game articles? --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Syndrome: Keep in mind that most of the Canada related stuff has been huffed. Those that are in the template were the strongest of the bunch. Also, Canada itself was organized and improved mostly through the efforts of a small cadre of Hoser fanatics (or "Hosatics", also the name of a wonderful a capella group), including one particularly memorable user. You might know him. He's devilishly handsome and has been told by several people that he flashed at the bus stop that the herpes medication is minimizing the outbreaks. The other pages on that template were each massaged by a single user or a small number of users, complete with happy endings. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. This article needs a {{Wikipedia}} because I have no idea who it's about, but it's not so bad. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 09:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. The author is still working on this. MrNFork you! 18:02, Apr 26
Keep. Changed my mind, just reviewed this. --TheImprovertalk • contribs • 22:37, Apr 26 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Starcruft. And I'm not talking about Starcraft. Read the article to see why. --TheImprovertalk • contribs • 03:10, Apr 26 2008 (UTC)
Comments
This noob appears to have written ten articles in just over a month. How about a tag of some sort to improve the article, maybe with a note to slow down and focus on quality rather than quantity. And to get rid of the litany of in-jokes. Sir Roger 10:46, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Van van vanity. The author's userpage even redirects to this page. I'd move this page to his userspace but I'm feeling spiteful today. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 01:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete How awful. Sir Roger 10:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. There is good random and bad random. This isn't the first one. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 11:01, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Upon further examination, this page was moved from Snake1337's userpage to the mainspace. Isn't there grounds for QVFD in there somewhere? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. It's getting in the way anyway. MrNFork you! 03:34, Apr 26
Delete Somehow it survived three years. Sir Roger 10:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Alex Lifeson
Keep
Delete
Yuck. He's a member of the Order of Canada. This page, however, isn't worth the paper its printed on. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 00:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete Looks like a load of random rubbish to me. Maybe there is something subtle I'm missing here, but I doubt it. MrNFork you! 01:01, Apr 25
Delete. This is pretty darn crap. Also, I hate the intro to YYZ - it took the longest time to get the hang of that on Expert on Guitar Hero 2. Bastard. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee10:28, Apr 25
Keep. Scrapped those useless "Famous" lists. Now it's not too bad. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Weak keep. Meh, it's not beyond salvation, particularly now the worst of the lists are gone. Rewrite tag and let it limp free. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee09:27, Apr 24
Keep. The only I can find wrong with it is that it may be too factual. It is funny, regardless.--Naughtius MaximusF@HWoof! MeowMUN 16:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Namedroppy, listy, unfunny, strange concept and no real coherence. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee11:01, Apr 23
Delete. Don't think this can be saved. MrNFork you! 12:24, Apr 23
Comments
University of Kent at Canterbury
Keep
Delete
Delete. A bit of unfunny piffle about a university, then a table of its union officers. Get rid. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee09:12, Apr 21
Throw it Back. Under the legal humor limit and comes from gibberish polluted water.--
Bomb
Abstain. There's maybe a dozen good items in there but a lot of it is wasted. Would also leave a lot of redlinks if deleted. --
Keep. Tasteless but passable. --
OMGSOCUTE! That... is about the extent of the article. No funny to speak of. 
Comment. Merge with 
