This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Shitler's List (oh dear, I'm getting lamer) --SirDJ~Irreverent 10:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. The blue links should be on the "see also" section of the various GTA pages. This page is unnecessary (and not in the usual Uncyclopedia manner of unnecessarity). SirModusoperandiBoinc! 10:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep. All it needs is about 60% of the page to go away, a whittle down to tightly focussed randomness. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 13:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep I don't think I'd even trim that much off. --OptyCSucks! CUN 19:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's got some good stuff here and there. MrNFork you! 21:04, Apr 2
Delete. Just another article on randomness, ignored Pee Review, no changes, ... let's kill the bastard child! --BlackInkWriter 09:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Did you guys actually read through that?? I think it's cliche and has no substance. --BlackInkWriter 09:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Wait! We're supposed to read pages?! Madness! SirModusoperandiBoinc! 10:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, not reading in that sense, but ... you know, skimming through that article like the pros do. Real quick. "Read-a-book-in-3-seconds" quick that is. I thought you guys were tougher about shabby articles. If FNM is gonna change it to the better, so be it. Then again, who am I to say? HEH! --BlackInkWriter 14:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Azazel
Keep
Weak Keep Not great, but it's coherent and sorta different. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:50, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete It may be short but it's got a list, an Oscar Wilde quote and a reference to Chuck Norris. The shit trifecta. --OptyCSucks! CUN 19:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Stoopid little one-liner that snuck by QVFD when we were all looking the other way. Do the right thing. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee11:21, Apr 1
Delete Possibly a good idea, but very poor execution. MrNFork you! 12:42, Mar 24
Delete. Nah, it's a poor, one-note idea based around a duff pun. I usually like bad puns, but this execution kills even that. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee09:55, Mar 30
Comment I read in that interview with Chronarion that the UnRecipies project was deleted once the lawsuits started rolling in. I don't know what exactly was illegal about it, but this article reminded me of that. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 07:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Still inconclusive after 9 days of voting. KeptSirCs1987UOTM.t.c 08:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete Stupid page containing articles of generally very low quality... Only once a year though eh? Next person to do this, gets a right slap on the bottom! :P MrNFork you! 22:03, Apr 1
Comment: It is still listed on UN:REQ. (Semi-off-topic: I have added a hatnote to UN:REQ reminding newbies about HTBFANJS and UN:PEE.) What should we do to solicit a rewrite effort? --Pentium5dot1 22:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
CBRL
Keep
Delete
Delete. A short, unfunny intro, then several unfunny lists. And that's it. Easy delete, surely? --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee15:12, Mar 30
Delete. Yeah, a bad idea turned into a bad article. Who'da thunk it? Plus, that image sucks. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee10:04, Mar 30
Nuke - What the fuck is this shit? (Bonner) (Talk) Mar 30, 19:38
Why does this even exist?Robertodole 20:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Bariscotin
Keep
Vanity? doubt barry scott wrote this article it is hardly flattering to him. I think it should be kept. Its quite short but it's a really funny idea--Veggieburgerfish 01:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Weak keepIn the USA Cilit Bang is called Easyoff BAM! and we have obnoxious commercials about it. This article is just barely worthwhile.--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep and expand - Made me smile (Bonner) (Talk) Mar 30, 19:37
Delete
Delete Vanity maybe. Pants anyway. MrNFork you! 00:24, Mar 28
Delete Random listy pants. --OptyCSucks! CUN 00:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Pants? WTF does that mean? Mr. N won't tell me! Le Cejak•<-> Mar 28 (01:29)
Delete. Don't see the good idea, do see a crappy little stub. And yes, I do know about the inestimable Mr Scott. Bah. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee10:03, Mar 30
Comments
Cajek: I want to tell you, I really do, but Mr. N threatened my family if I told you. --OptyCSucks! CUN 22:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
if your reading this and you don't already know who Barry Scott is- then don't take part in the discussion. I am from the U.K. and its just occurred to me that maybe you don't have Cilit bang in the U.S.--Veggieburgerfish 01:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
That as it may be, the mere fact that this may not be vanity is not in and of itself a reason to keep an article. Also, MrN9000 is a jolly old UKer, and he nommed this article... -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 01:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
BANG! and the dirt is gone!!!! Um, come on now though... OK, I have to admit I did not notice the reference to the advert... I guess that's why I said maybe vanity. It is however still pants... There is potential there for a good article here, but I'm afraid this has got caught up in part of my stub hunt. If you want to copy this to your userspace and make an actual article out of this Veggieburgerfish go for it... If you're not up for doing this, I'm not sure who will be. Also, we don't exclude people from voting based on where they live, so please don't try to tell others what to do or not to do when voting on VFD. Oh, I hope you do have a go at 'righting' this, it would be good to see the results! Have fun... MrNFork you! 04:50, Mar 29
Oh, I'm not sure, but I think Optimuschris may be British also... MrNFork you! 04:53, Mar 29
Nope, American. But I've always hated Eastenders if that's any consolation. :P --OptyCSucks! CUN 13:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Me approves of this. --ASHPD 04:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete A dumping ground for in-jokes. YouFang 23:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
This is a rather old article that has gone through many revisions. It is one of those articles that seems to believe the referencing of in-jokes is funny. I disagree.
Delete Not the most random stub I have nominated, but I don't think this is worth keeping. Does anyone think I'm a Square VFD pusher? MrNFork you! 22:40, Mar 24
Delete It reads like someone pushed out some brown... --OptyCSucks! CUN 23:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
$Delete. as per Bonner Robertodole 20:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Obido
Keep
Delete
Delete Well I don't really get the idea of this page. Wikipedia does not either, and I think it's not really something we are interested in. It's pants also... MrNFork you! 22:40, Mar 24
Delete Nope, I don't get it either. --OptyCSucks! CUN 22:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep Tricky one this. Although there is much that is total bollocks here, there does appear to be some sort of an idea behind it. If someone knows of where this has been done better elsewhere, I'm happy to change to delete, but for now, it's a keeper for me. MrNFork you! 00:06, Mar 24
Delert Being offensive is cool, being lame isn't. Le Cejak•<Mar 28, 2008 [18:44]>
Comments
Abs There are more offensive articles than this one, and the bastard in me actually kinda finds the idea funny, but the execution is poor. MrNFork you! 18:48, Mar 24
Runescape and Runescape Clans
Keep
Keep I think this article should be kept, what if any RS player comes here and wants to |learn about it, they search Runescape and it comes up with a page that has been spammed too |much. KEEP IT! Dragonfir731 18:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Erm, shouldn't this be on a Runescape forum? Anywhere but Uncyc anyways. --OptyCSucks! CUN 00:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep I found that to be a rather good page. KingdomAlaska 11:00, March 27, 2008
Keep Dude. Did you check the history page? I'm guessing you did not, or you would have noticed: "10:29, 6 February 2008 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) (Kept via VFD) (undo)". Hardly worth nominating it again now? MrNFork you! 01:25, Mar 28
Oh man, I hate keeping things the only reason to keep this is because it has over 50 edits by lots of different (albeit not famous) users. A good reason to delete it would be that it hasn't seriously been edited since 2/4/08. Le Cejak•<-> Mar 28 (01:28)
Delete
CruftHuff - I clicked the link, it is a non-existent or made up website. Not funny either way. --Kurgan 01:12, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep As ya say Arotenbe, there are a few good lines in here... To me, that means it's worth keeping. MrNFork you! 19:12, Mar 25
Keep. It's not as great as the George W. Bush or Windows Vista articles, but it's better than your average Uncyclopedia entry. SteveSims 09:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete There's a few funny spots, but otherwise there isn't much worth salvaging here, and when I look up Slashdot I don't expect to get a disambig page. I would say redirect but nothing else links here. « Arotenbe « aka arotenbe, AaronR, etc. « Now what did I do? « 07:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Withdrawn On a second read, it seems funnier than before. Still needs quite a bit of work though. « Arotenbe « aka arotenbe, AaronR, etc. « Now what did I do? « 19:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Kept, also, Arotenbe, please never remove {{VFD}} tags again. No matter what. Ever. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 04:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Johnson's Lotion
Keep
Delete
Throw Away - Unlubricated and unfunny stub. --MidwayHaven 05:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete - A piece of crap that slipped through our security systems, partly thanks to crafty use of a construction template and Wikia not updating Special:Deadendpages. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Crush. Kill. Destroy.YouFang 07:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Sent to QVFD per [2] I think you could have deleted this Cs, but I'm not sure... MrNFork you! 21:45, Mar 27
Texas Tech
Keep
Delete
Delete Looks like this one slipped through the net thanks to clever use of WIP. MrNFork you! 19:07, Mar 27
Delete In order to save this, you'd have to trim off a few paragraphs from the top, throw out the last few headers, delete the list, and by then there's really nothing left. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 07:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep. yes, It sucks balls,(like its supposed to) but it needs at most an ICU tag and a little bit of work, noi a flat out deletion.--Zeta 01:57, 23 March 2008 (EST)
Delete
Delete. Itsucks balls. There, I said it.--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:57, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Per the above balls relate issue. MrNFork you! 02:30, Mar 23
Delete. *Sigh*. You'd figure that a subject like giant men hitting each other with chairs would make for a better page than this. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 01:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. What the hell was I thinking. Too many happy pills obviously. MrNFork you! 19:15, Mar 25
Delete This stub is rather a waste of an important article name for me. Obviously the joke is that it's a 'small article' but??? Na... Lot's links here, but I suspect we can get something better if we delete and leave this as a red link for a while. MrNFork you! 16:56, Mar 22
CruftHuff - It is a rather small stub --Kurgan 23:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete Vanity and piss poor vanity at that. Mustafa Kamal is the mayor of Karachi [3] and not really notable of anything. Also the article sucks and has been blanked many times --Moneke 04:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete I notice it was blanked by the original author. I guess he changed his mind. I'd say keep it like Mr winkler is GAY but it sucks. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
CVP - Not funny, created 6 or 7 times already --Kurgan 22:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Get Rid In whatever manor is appropriate. MrNFork you! 02:28, Mar 23
Not enough prep. Might rewrite this one, too, but I'd be keeping none of the original content so I might as well start anew from nothing. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete --Elementally flawed. --OptyCSucks! CUN 15:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Somebody Else
Keep
Delete
Delete This is a stub,m it can be repaired, but only if Somebody Else took enought ime to write it, and is probably better off NOT being able to be reverted to this Zeta 09:33, 23 March 2008 (EST)
Delete Somebody Else should actually write this article. MrNFork you! 16:56, Mar 22
Delete! For the sake of Sophia! although there may be space for a joke like this (i don't think so), however this particular article is irredeemably crap, and poorly executed. too short, very badly written, no images and a shaky concept not to mention the ridiculous title. i don't think this can ever be good. --orian57 07:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Not eligible. It's still not a week old. Also, you have a 30 days maintenance tag on it. ~ 09:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's being salvaged! MrNFork you! 20:39, Mar 23
Delete
Delete Shorter than Ronnie Corbett, and um? What are you talking about on the talk page TKF? MrNFork you! 16:56, Mar 22
Comments
Comment: Taxonomy classes: Kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species. A real Wilde quotes goes "I have nothing to declare but my own genius." - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 21:28, Mar 22
Reverted it back to a longer version that had been nearly blanked six months ago. --monika 21:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Ahh, I get the Wilde quote now... I'm not sure the revert actually improved the article (thanks Monika, you make me feel all warm inside). Is it worth keeping this article just for one quote? We could move the quote elsewhere in the wiki, and get rid of the rest? MrNFork you! 02:27, Mar 23
That's why I kept the VFD tag. --monika 06:39, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm sure your reason for keeping the VFD tag was that the vote is not yet finished and only administrators can close a vote. I'm sure you knew that... MrNFork you! 12:59, Mar 23
To answer your question, that quote makes the light of the sun not seem so bright, by comparison. In other words, yes. Also, no to the second bit . That quote was made for this page. Also, I was made for lovin' you baby. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
CruftHuff - I don't know why, but it should have been --Kurgan 17:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. /me asks myself same question SysRq is asking.–—Hv(talk) 21/03 18:18
Delete. And give OptyC a copy - I'd be interested to see if he can make anything out of this mess! --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee18:23, Mar 21
ABS Made me chuckle, but it's got a lot o' lists and without those there's really nothing there. If (when) this gets deleted, save a copy in my userspace and I'll see what I can do with it. --OptyCSucks! CUN 15:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep. There's a lot of junk on it, but come on, it's the counterpart of a spork. --Syndrome 03:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Surprise keep. I've performed quoticide, listicide, and randomicide on this, and I think what's left is saveable. Slap a rewrite tag on it, see what happens. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee18:21, Mar 21
Keep I'd been holding off voting on this because I couldn't decide, but with UU's pruning it now looks salvagable. --OptyCSucks! CUN 14:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep just to piss off RAHB. --Syndrome 07:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep. It's not brilliant, but we keep worse. Slap a rewrite tag on it and see if anyone polishes it to a decent level of shine. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee10:03, Mar 19
Delete. Too avant-garde for my taste. --
They're coming to take me away
oh fine I agree with both keep and delete on this one, now. 
Weak Keep Not great, but it's coherent and sorta different. --
Comment. Recent edits have made it less awful. Switching to neutral vote. --
