This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Delete. - Take it to ED. MrNFork you! 12:10, Mar 8
Delete Personally, I thought it was funny. But that's only because I have an affinity for squirrels. And LSD. Objectively, it's gotta go. Optimuschris 15:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Even ED wouldn't take this junk. Not meme'ed or "edgy" enough. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. The umpire raises his finger o' doom, and it's back to the pavilion for this one. Why yes, I do like cricket, how can you tell? --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee18:20, Mar 8
He's hit it high, high in the air, the fielder's under it and he's out. –—Hv(talk) 8/03 18:23
Comments
Mauled in America
Keep
Delete
Delete Maybe there is an idea behind this one, but I can't figure out what it is.MrNFork you! 22:42, Mar 7
Delete I think it's supposed to be about the Mall of America, but it's so random and stupid I can't be sure. Optimuschris 23:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. A really bad idea that turns out to be a really bad article. Who'd'a thunk it? --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee18:12, Mar 8
Comments
Comment. I'll save you the trouble of opening a link, it's two paragraphs long and here's an excerpt: Reading 50's science fiction whilst visiting the Mauled in America's Sears is known to produce several species of llama. Don't try it.--Count of Monkey Crisco 15:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Tikrit
Keep
Delete
Delete Well, it's pants. Um, Sadam is now dead (or so they have you believe) and um, it's pants. MrNFork you! 22:42, Mar 7
Delete Has anybody mentioned it's pants? Optimuschris 23:29, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Cruft-Huff Stub --Kurgan 10:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete Very poor town cruft. MrNFork you! 22:42, Mar 7
Yeah, what he said. Optimuschris 22:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
CruftHuff Towncruft --Kurgan 10:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. I worked there for, ohhh, about 3 days I think. It's not a great place, but it doesn't deserve an article this crap. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee18:04, Mar 8
Comments
Planned Parenthood
Keep
Delete
Delete Random, pointless and nothing to make it worth hanging onto. MrNFork you! 22:42, Mar 7
Delete crap. Optimuschris 23:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
CruftHuff Unfunny random stub --Kurgan 10:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Weak delete A good expansion on the theme might save it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete Whilst reading this article I swear I actually heard Bob turn in his grave. Honest... Lets show this one the exit and hope someone else can do a better job. MrNFork you! 22:42, Mar 7
Delete It's terrible. Optimuschris 23:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
"Exodus is a medical condition caused by bob marley. It is induced by listening to his albim, which contains the imortal song Hitler only had one ball" --Kurgan 10:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete VFD tags are evil things you know... Evil I tell you! MrNFork you! 01:53, Mar 7
Delete. I like the punny title. Unfortunately, that's where the list of things I like about this ends. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee19:06, Mar 7
Delete I couldn't agree more with sir UnderUser. Optimuschris 22:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. It could be a good article. However, this isn't one. –—Hv(talk) 7/03 19:25
Keep It's an "Interview With a Vampire" right? Cool film. OK article. It's deadpan and I like a bit of that... MrNFork you! 02:02, Mar 7
Keep, don't delete everything you don't like. SteveSims 10:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep, it's passable, though not brilliant. I agree on the w-l thing. –—Hv(talk) 7/03 19:28
Keep. Where the fuck did my vote go? I know I cast it, Heerenveen's comment above here is agreeing with it! Anyway, it still stands... --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee18:01, Mar 8
Delete I'd rather read Interview with the Umpire. Now that would be funny. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 01:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete It's almost a word for word transcript of the book. The few "jokes" (Larry King's a vampire?) aren't enough to redeem it. Optimuschris 15:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep It's not awesome, but not that bad. I guess the joke is that the article is not written in plain English, which I guess also allows for the poor formatting. A keeper in my eyes. MrNFork you! 01:58, Mar 7
Keep. Self referential and interesting idea. But I think it could still be funny and well formatted - just make the extensive vocabulary and excess verbosity a complete impediment to comprehension. Pics would be nice too. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee19:03, Mar 7
Weak keep as self-reference/meta. –—Hv(talk) 7/03 19:26
Delete I did like the Way of the Intercepting Nose, but other than that it's pants, and I don't see anyone ever bothering to improve this stub. MrNFork you! 00:51, Mar 7
Delete Yeah, this can go. Optimuschris 21:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Spider geek
Keep
Delete
Delete This is one of those which is so bad, maybe it's good... You decide. MrNFork you! 00:51, Mar 7
Delete Though it could be rewritten to be funny. Like Spider-Geek could be written to collect comics, debate about Star Wars with other geeks/nerds, and his spidersense warns him of bullies that are going to give him wedgies. But other than that, I don't really see this article as ever being funny. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 01:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Not nice. Not nice at all. –—Hv(talk) 7/03 19:31
Delete My Spider-Sense is NOT tingling. Optimuschris 20:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Wikinati
Keep
Delete
Delete Aside from the brilliant Mr. Potato Head reference I see little point in keeping this. /end sarcasm. MrNFork you! 00:51, Mar 7
Delete Nothing but an unfunny conspiracy theory. They should at least try to keep the metric system down and change traffic lights to switch to red too fast or something so more people get traffic tickets. Though the Mr. Potatohead reference is funny, nothing else seems to be funny. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 01:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete I like the idea, but the execution is shit. Optimuschris 19:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I get a massive sense of déjà vu reading this. Delete. –—Hv(talk) 7/03 19:32
Comments
The Ayamar
Keep
Delete
Delete. Just got no idea what they are going on about, but whatever it is, it's not good. MrNFork you! 20:21, Mar 6
Delete Yeah, I don't get it either. Optimuschris 20:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. The only bit I recognised was when it mentioned chocolate. Mmm, chocolate... Anyway, this article sucks. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee22:29, Mar 6
Delete. I really don't get this one. It's not the worst think I have nominated for VFD, but I don't think it's worth keeping. MrNFork you! 20:21, Mar 6
Delete I was gonna nom this the other day. I must have gotten distracted by something shiny. Optimuschris 20:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Gravity makes the standard of this article go down...if that's possible. –—Hv(talk) 7/03 19:36
Comments
Cat5 Industries
Keep
Delete
Delete Now we all know (well some of us) what Cat5 is, but I sense a possible collision on the carrier of this multiple access. the term nurd can be defined as being anyone who knows what MrN is talking about... Oh, the article is pants. Obviously. MrNFork you! 20:40, Mar 5
Delete What, no "set us up the bomb" joke? Optimuschris 21:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete At first glance this looks like a decent stub. But, um, read it. No thanks. It's related to the Sock-People article (which is passable), but I just don't really think we need this particular article on 'Sock monkeys' MrNFork you! 20:40, Mar 5
Delete. Actually seemed pretty crap to me on first glance. A read through confirmed that's just what it is. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee09:53, Mar 6
Delete. How the hell does one make the jump from "Calisota" to Disney? Optimuschris 22:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. /me subtly shits on the article. I have seen worse, but it can go. MrNFork you! 23:40, Mar 6
Delete It seems to be a failed attempt at some pop-culture Disney fictional state that doesn't exist except in the "Ducktales", "Gimzoduck", and "Darkwing Duck" shows. Other than that it appears to be random and unfunny. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 01:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete and move to IllogicopediaSirCs1987UOTM.t.c 01:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
63rd amendment
Keep
Delete
Delete. Really not worth keeping. We have a few amendment related articles, but I don't think this one adds to them. MrNFork you! 20:21, Mar 6
Err, yeah This has no redeeming value whatsoever. Optimuschris 21:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep Per Optimuschris' rewrite. Can someone with a HuffMaster call this kept please? MrNFork you! 02:04, Mar 6
Keep. Still needs more work (a few more line breaks to stop it looking like a few blocks o' text, and some links and pics as mentioned), but it's certainly not deletable now. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee10:09, Mar 6
I'm embarrassed to admit I'm not sure what you mean by line breaks. Optimuschris 16:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
KEEP Needs a lick of paint. Not literally of course, that would be unworkable. It did make me smile though. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:39, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Now I know this has got to be a great idea for an article, but a fresh start might inspire someone to actually write this, rather than just leave a list like this. MrNFork you! 20:40, Mar 5 per Optimuschris' rewrite. MrNFork you! 01:54, Mar 6
Delete Doesn't live up to the promising title. Optimuschris 22:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Okay, I just blanked it and completely rewrote it. Still not great, but I think a lot better than what was there. I'll leave it on VFD and let you decide. If it survives, I'll linkify it a bit and add some pictures. If not, I won't take it personally. If you have any suggestions, feel free to leave them on my talk page. Oh, and obviously I'll abstain. Optimuschris 01:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
MY EYES!!!!!11 That. Article. Is. Pure. Crap. Spockezri
Comments
Mesothelioma
Keep
Delete
Delete Maybe there is an idea to this article, but it's such a small one, and so little work has gone into this, I think we can safely loose it. MrNFork you! 20:40, Mar 5
Delete. Oh I see. For a minute I though you meant you created it MrN, and I was wondering what kind of a spasm you were having on that day. Really crap. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee16:45, Mar 5
Keep - It's pretty much an Uncyc institution. I would never read it or edit it, but it's the only page on Uncyc that is both legal and fun to vandalise, with the obvious exception of <insert name here>'s userpage. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 07:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Kepp. Mostly because I agree, but also because of Cs1987's use of the username template made my heart skip a beat. Well played. --DyslexicRetard 07:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Worth the bother I think. MrNFork you! 10:44, Mar 5
Duh. it's a place where anons decide to spam hentai images 50,000 times over again and write *insert reproductive organ here* a mile down the page - I think that's the point. Ironic, no? •Spang•☃•talk• 11:03, 05 Mar 2008
Keep. Why not. Optimuschris 18:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete This page is one of those things where it's good on paper, but bad in practice. Instead of a place where we create actually amusing vandalism it's a place where anons decide to spam hentai images 50,000 times over again and write *insert reproductive organ here* a mile down the page. I know it's supposedly classic, but I can't take it any more. JediBobThings I've saidThings I've done 01:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Just use the sandbox instead. -->:( 02:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - As above really, it's just pointless (Bonner) (Talk) Mar 5, 07:47
Delete. OK, true story time folks: this has had a VFD tag on it for a little while, but wasn't on the queue. It was found by an IP, who found it unfunny and added the tag. But then he didn't put it on here. Instead, I suspect he saw the review on the talk page, because he then went off and wrote an article called Laugh police about how we suck. However, he does have a point - this is random and crap. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee13:47, Mar 3
Delete. So many words and so much rubbish. I can see nothing to suggest this should be kept. Considering the tittle, I think we can much better MrNFork you! 19:41, Mar 3
Rolls a natural 1. Unfunny, stubby, and bound to get vandalized in wake of his recent death. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete Gary deserves a better page than this tripe. Optimuschris 00:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
John Hammond
Keep
Delete
Delete. Random crap, basically. I could go into more detail, but why waste the effort when the writer obviously didn't? --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee14:49, Mar 4
Delete. It was not written by an idiot, but it's just a random style with no coherent idea behind it. MrNFork you! 19:25, Mar 4
Delete. Short, outstandingly crap, and has somehow survived since 2005. Don't let it survive any further. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee14:49, Mar 4
I'm going to sit on the fence. I'm probably just in a good mood though, and might slip off later. As random stubs go, this one actually tickled me a little, but it's far from great... MrNFork you! 19:32, Mar 4
Schnitzel
Keep
Delete
Delete Not the worst of stubs, but it's got no humour value as far as I can tell. MrNFork you! 21:11, Mar 3
Delete. Uhh? Heads quickly in the direction of random, and has no point or idea. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee09:41, Mar 4
Delete Starts out mediocre and goes downhill from there. Optimuschris 00:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete Rather pointless stub. MrNFork you! 20:59, Mar 3
Delete. Crap and unfunny. That ED Main Page link makes me suspicious as to its origins as well. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee09:39, Mar 4
Delete Holy shit, this is our page on the Old Ones? We can do so much better! Optimuschris 00:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep. I notice the first vote on here is actually a fan of Guybrush, as I am. There's got to be some value to an article on him. -BaronGrackle 19:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. I click Random page, I get this. Go figure. Poor old Guybrush deserves better than this random crap. Cue swordfighting insults from anyone who played the game. "I got this scar on my face during a mighty struggle!" --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee20:28, Mar 3
Delete. /me cheekily towel flicks UU with a {{VFD}}. I do feel left out having never played 'Gaybrush'... Really that's a game? Or are you pulling my plonker? MrNFork you! 20:35, Mar 3
Delete. - Bulldoze it and start over. I hope the author learned to stop picking his nose. Once it's deleted, recreate it with a redirect to Monkey Island until we have something decent. --WillMcC 20:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete It's boring and full of red links. Wipe it, if we need an article on this a fresh start would be better. Optimuschris 00:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment. /me points MrN at this. Only one of the finest and funniest adventure games from wayyyy back when I were closer to being a nipper... --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee20:38, Mar 3
How about a rewrite of the article instead? -BaronGrackle 19:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Um, maybe... First of, you put you 'keep' vote in the wrong place. If you want this kept, please move the 'keep' to the correct place... The thing you need to think about when suggesting a 'rewrite' is that sometimes it's actually better to delete the article, and then allow someone else to come along with a fresh start... This often produces a better article than if someone tries to work with an earlier version which is particularly poor. In my view, this article is not worth saving, and would best be started again. If you disagree (which is obviously cool) just move your vote to the correct place, and it will be considered along with the others. Thanks! MrNFork you! 19:37, Mar 4
Fair enough. I was under the impression that an article would have a harder time surviving if it had already been attempted and deleted one or several times. Since that is not the case, I shall recant. -BaronGrackle 02:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete. What the hell is all this about? 
Comment. I'll save you the trouble of opening a link, it's two paragraphs long and here's an excerpt: Reading 50's science fiction whilst visiting the Mauled in America's Sears is known to produce several species of llama. Don't try it.--
Interview With the Vampire
Keep. Not terrible. --
