This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Delete. It's stupid that people fall for such a silly cliche, eh? SirModusoperandiBoinc! 10:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Glasgow Rangers
Keep
Delete
Delete. Soccercruft. It's not good, it's never been good, it's a vandal magnet (check the history) and basically consists of Rangers fans proclaiming their team's superiority, and Celtic fans proclaiming how shit Rangers are. By turns. It's listy and unfunny too. Can I suggest deletion and CVPing? --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee12:25, Feb 27
Delete. Let's try again. I hope we would not need to CVP if started in a 'better' way. These guys are rather important football teams, so a CVP would be a shame. MrNFork you! 14:52, Feb 27
Delete, though not CVP - I might have a crack at it if I have time. –—Hv(talk) 28/02 15:45
Comments
Cellic
Keep
Delete
Delete. Soccercruft. It's not good, it's never been good, it's a vandal magnet (check the history) and basically consists of Celtic fans proclaiming their team's superiority, and Glasgow Rangers fans proclaiming how shit Celtic are. By turns. It's listy and unfunny too. Can I suggest deletion and CVPing? (And also removing the redirect at Celtic). --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee12:25, Feb 27
Delete. Let's try again. I hope we would not need to CVP if started in a 'better' way. These guys are rather important football teams, so a CVP would be a shame. MrNFork you! 15:01, Feb 27
Delete Might need Celtic but sure we don't need Cellic. Unless Cellic is some kind of kitchen surface cleaner, in which case I could do with a couple of sprays mAttlobster. (hello) 00:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete Nonsense of the unfunniest order. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byYouFang (talk • contribs)
Delete. Oprah vs Pee Wee Herman. Amazingly, this fails to live up to the comedy gold that concept promises. </sarcasm> --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee09:30, Feb 26
Delete. Looks like it's not worth saving. MrNFork you! 14:00, Feb 27
CruftHuff - Short, listy World of Warcruft --Kurgan 22:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Kerkill I'm just going to take this time to say this: People need to learn when a quote is funny and somewhat adds to the article such as the actual Mr. T quote and when it makes someone not want to even look at the goddamn article, otherwise know as the other five goddamn quotes!!! Also, the picture is broken, there are too many red-links in my opinion, it is using level three headers when it should use level two headers, and it lacks anything funny. --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 01:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Keep I did want to delete this, but now I think that it should be kept to stop someone writing it about 'some soldier specialist guy'. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:25, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Shoots the article with shotgun Ok seriously, Solid Snake is some soldier specialist guy from Metal Gear Solid, not some leader of the African American community. This is just stupid and unfunny. I only laughed because it's total BS. --Dark Paladin X 18:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Shoots article with AK-47 gay, boring ------TheDragonManChase the Dragon! 20:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
CruftHuff - Unfunny, red-linky Metal Gear-cruft --Kurgan 22:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Kill. This is a duplicate of the Zimbabwe article created by an anon that doesn't know how to move pages properly. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:44, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Kerkill Though, I wish the Falcons, Hawks, and Braves would quit their GODDAMN LOSING! WIN GODDAMNIT! --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 20:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
CruftHuff - Unfunny stub --Kurgan 22:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete. The idea is OK, but the execution is a short and not very good list. And it hasn't been touched in ages, meaning it's unlikely to get any better. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee09:40, Feb 23
Delete. As per Under_user. Underdeveloped zygote with no arms or heart. ----OEJ 16:51, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
This was an article that provided content, not anymore it's not. Huge list, conflicting views and mostly dry. -- (talk) • (contribs) • (email me!) 22:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments
I browsed through the history and found that this was supposed to be a spoof of the infamous campaign that everybody knew about, but now I think it's degraded into something Uncyclopedia doesn't even want. I'm keeping the original "spoof" page here. But I don't think anyone cares or knows about the infamous campaign. -- (talk) • (contribs) • (email me!)22:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
@SysRq: Because looking at the edit history, they always revert it explaining that it's vandalism or blanking. when in reality it isn't. That's why when this is kept, I want the page protected from IP's. -- (talk) • (contribs) • (email me!) 01:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete I don't like this; and because of that I believe it should be deleted. Even if everyone in the world votes keep, I still believe it should be deleted. Just give me this day baby. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete The obligatory, 'What's she gonna look like with a chimney on her. Whaaaat's sheeeeeeeee gonnnnnnnnnnnnnna loooooooooook likeeeeeeeeeee' mAttlobster. (hello) 21:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't know if this helps or means anything. --THINKER 21:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
I think we could speculate for a long time about what this means. Maybe we could dedicate our lives to really understanding the true meaning of this. But I don't know; I just stared into the sky, caught a glimspe of some star that's probably already gone, and thought to myself that maybe I'll be happy never to really know. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Celebrity Deathmatch
Keep
Delete
Delete.. Besides the fact that I didn't find a grain of humor in it, it has been a battle ground between two users and an IP for a long time now. Observe the talk page. Let's end it. ~ 09:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Kerkill And he is actually one of the few good somewhat new rappers. I blame Lil Wayne and Soulja Boi. --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 21:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
How To:Eat An Albino Without It Possessing Your Soul
Keep
Delete
Delete. - It fails almost everything listed on HTBFANJS. Pointless lists, links to Snakes on a Plane, lots of stale jokes; I'm surprised that it doesn't have a link to AAAAAAAAA! --WillMcC 03:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete. As per Modus Operandi, I only wish there was anything salvagable about this article, because the title is great. Robertodole 02:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete. - Basically a chicken related list. (Bonner) (Talk) Feb 20, 08:03
Delete. Feels like a spork from either the back of the game box or wikipedia, with the word "chicken" inserted here and there. Not funny. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee12:33, Feb 20
Delete What the? I have no idea. MrNFork you! 19:53, Feb 19
CruftHuff - They are a major league baseball team, but this page sucks --Kurgan 20:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Kerkill The Mike Gravel joke almost made it a keep for me. NOT! Go Braves!and fucking win for once!!! --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 21:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Out! Strike 1: Randomness, Strike 2: Hackneyed References, Strike 3: Unfunny. --Count of Monkey Crisco 14:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Neutral I don't quite see enough to say huff but I don't think I want to vote keep. There are some OK spots but most is crap. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 22:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Keep Seems acceptable, with a little rewriting --Dork lord 15:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Keep I don't see the problem here. --THINKER 20:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Keep. He does. If he asks to borrow your roll of toilet paper, say "No!", 'cause he'll keep it. Prick. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 00:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Is a bear Catholic? Possibly rewrite or expansion tag, but I think it's a keeper. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee12:28, Feb 20
Delete. I looked at it on Wikipedia. I looked at this article. It seems to have little or nothing to do with it, it isn't funny, and it comes across as kinda random. So delete or move to Ethereal's userspace if he thinks he can save it. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Keep. There's funny in there. Rewrite tag. If it is deleted, request a copy in my userspace so I can have a go at it when I have time. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
keep It's terrible as it stands, but I think it could be saved with some love and attention. The right kind of drugs might help as well. --Optimuschris 01:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete
Delete (From lounge) Short, random, not funny. Oh, it's been on VFD before, but, I think we can do better... MrNFork you! 19:49, Feb 18
Keep. I checked the history... It was vandalised (kinda) a few days back, and has now been reverted. It's not awesome, but I see no reason to delete. MrNFork you! 02:47, Feb 18
Musician Cruft - I swear he (Jones) died almost 40 years ago, but I bet he can still write a better page than this. --Kurgan 02:12, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete. Let Vosnul work on it... MrNFork you! 03:20, Feb 18
Shift to Vosnul's userspace and possibly CVP until he's got something decent to put back there. As it stands, it's listy, ranty, and a vandal magnet. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments
I wiped some tripe on it. but if it is huffed anyway i'd like an admin to move it to my userpage.--Vosnul 21:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Nom and Delete We need to get rid of this bad Constinly Vandalised Article. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete I would not call this page a vandal magnet. I look after Gay. Now that's a vandal magnet... This article contains no ideas which are not present in Gay, and is really not that great. I would be happy to see Homosexual deleted, in which case it should probably be redirected to Gay. If someone wants to write a better article of this tittle in the future, they can... MrNFork you! 13:08, Feb 19
Delete It's no fun for anyone, even if they've eaten a scone. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments
CometPlease note that this page has been VFD and Huffed twice already. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 04:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)