Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive11

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion
Revision as of 08:37, April 26, 2011 by Fnoodle (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Collegium V

Expanded after most votes had been cast; resubmit if desired --—rc (t) 03:57, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Dormitory V.A.I.N.ity? I've given them a friendly warning, but they seem to be updating without heeding or even wanting to discuss it. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 09:42, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

It is a satellite article of University of Texas at Dallas. It seems mostly a collection of inside jokes. However, if uncyclopedia ever becomes complete, every school will have an entry full of such a collection. It is arguable whether this is desirable. (Workin on that laziness boss!) ~Spl
UtarEmpire has set the standard on college-related articles with his series under the category of Wheeling Jesuit University. This article doesn't even come close. Which is why we shouldn't just delete it. We should delete the hell out of it'. And possibly vandalize it first. ~MM

Hmm, I keep missing when there is a discussion on pages. Anyway, this article is decidedly unfunny pretty much. Both it and University of Texas at Dallas need serious scrapping and recreation. Perhaps some of you should state if any parts at all are funny, tell us why the rest aren't, and then let us rework the UTD page to fit with uncyclopedia. --Xerika 18:21, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

The funny part is the "Have you seen this Cat" poster on the U-Dallas page. Although it's not that funny, and it's hard to tell if it's original. Other than that, they stink of vanity, and I vote both for speedy chopping. For it to be funny, it has to make someone like me laugh who's never been to and knows nothing about the school. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 18:54, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I think that the people here should either wait a while to see how it developes. Since those working on it are all full time college students, they can only work on this in their free time. The article has been around less than a week and you want to get rid of it. The Wheeling Jesuit University article took almost a month to write, and I'm guessing that the writer did not have to worry about college, high school, work, or has one of those boring jobs where the only way to keep your sanity is to mess around on the internet. Collegium V and the University of Texas at Dallas is just the first college to get around to adding itself to Uncyclopedia. No other college has gotten around to this yet, or they fell past the eyes of the 31 admins. Almost everything can be construed as an inside joke, and if you wish the site to expand, you would have to accept the fact that some inside jokes will appear on the page.--Brephophagia 20:34, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

That assumes that we really want all the colleges in the world adding themselves to Uncyclopedia. Personally, I'm not keen on it. For one, the chance that we'll get really good articles is low. While they may be kickass for the people who know that college, there's a fair chance that nobody else will get it. We shoot for fairly wide accessibility in our articles here. Secondly, I don't want to deal with all the petty flame wars and vandalizations which are guarenteed to happen if we get a bunch of different colleges leaving their marks here.
As a comparison, the bulk of the Wheeling Jesuit University is written in the style of a historical writeup on the campus. The bulk of CV reads like a vanity page. UTD is a list of random facts with no flow or internal consistency. If you can give these pages some internal consistencey and make them amusing, do it up. I laugh when reading the WJU page. I have to constantly remind myself that instantly deleting the other two would be in bad form when I read them. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 22:45, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
What is your target audience anyway? Also, I'm going to be talking with Xerika and Brephophagia on how to get these pages in better form--D3matt 00:59, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Target audience is Sir Elvis, UK; myself, Northern New England; Rcmurphy, California. That is, we want 95% of our articles to be accessible to 95% of the people who pop in here, regardless of where they are from. While some articles will definitely blow by some people, the goal is to have moderately-educated people piss themselves laughing. A good number of us know about college in general. However, I'd bet that few people here know wtf Collegium V is. I googled for it because I was trying to judge the article.
Right now, the CV page is just so random it's hard to tell what's going on. If it instead promoted Collegium V as the newest major at UTD, (wizardy, due to Harry Potter's popularity) and was all about explaining what the major is and on how hard the classes for it are, we might not be having this discussion. That might be pretty damn funny, and it would, if done well, indicate to non-familiar readers that it is at least a set of courses. At the moment, it's hard to tell if it's a fraternity, a bit of student housing, or a campus club. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 22:01, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I'm working on some changes to some of this page and the UTD page. I too will work with Xerika and Brephophagia to improve the broad appeal of the page. Give us a chance to make this have some broader appeal.|Trogdor
Hey - that's why we put pages here and talk about them, if they are more than a single line of crap. It lets folks like you speak out, and spare the article in question. Had you not, it would have been deleted about a week ago. As it is, your fillibuster here allows your page to live on and on. It's really quite impressive. I'm just hoping that after all this time, effort, and debate, it's funny enough to keep. ;) Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 23:47, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Andrew Tritz

Kept I guess IP votes count for something. --—rc (t) 03:57, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Ok, this doesn't seem to be about anyone famous (37 google results), and I swear I can't tell if this is slander or vanity. Hence the invented word Slandanity. I am not sure, but I suspect John Kleeb, Carrie Whitcomb and Tamara of Greensboro might be related (or at least two). Also, I have this rash I can't get rid of... --Splaka CUN Bur. SG CM © 08:55, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Update, VFD tag removed *pout*. ~S
I've had a word on their talk.

Delete. Vanity, and therefore it must die. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 19:38, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep. At least half of it is true, so it can't be considered slander. --68.255.90.114 23:54, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I think it's all funny. --152.1.147.82 20:07, 4 Sep 2005 (EST)

All these numbers, I think they're trying to communicate with us! Wait, they could be dangerous... anybody remember subtraction from grade school? --Spintherism 06:44, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep I don't think it needed to be re-written in the first place. It was sarcastic, but not vindictive or truly hateful. When we start equating pointed sarcasm with genuine "hatespeech", we're in trouble. Anyway, I think the new P.C. version is workable.

Delete Who is Andrew Tritz? --Nytrospawn 17:07, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Gay rights

Rewritten by Famine --—rc (t) 03:57, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Irredemable. Most of this anon author's contributions happen to be pretty homophobic tripe. Matthew Shepard was saved by Carlb, and I'm in the process of saving Liberal Christianity, though that one is also risking deletion. Nonetheless, this article is beyond saving. DELETE. --OneTopJob6 00:49, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand. Which words that sound like "Gay rights" are you objecting to? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:57, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I don't know... It intends to make all intolerant dudes accept the goodness of a psychosexual disorder that leads to acts causing AIDS and various forms of cancer, because if they do not they shall receive ten months of sensitivity training in the bowels of Heck. Gay rights activists have been successful at such endeavours as making pederastry an alternative lifestyle, and bringing STD's to the public. Sarcastic in the vein of Evil Atheist Conspiracy and Gay agenda, or genuine hate-rambling in the vein of all the shit you see all over the net? You be the judge. But read the article first. --OneTopJob6 01:28, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
But which words are homophobes, i.e., words that sound alike but mean something different? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:04, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I say redirect to Gay Rites and write that article. --Spintherism 04:49, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Now that is inspired, Do what spin says--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 11:22, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

But doesn't all this discussion of gay rights marginalise left-handed gay people, already a one-in-ten minority within a one-in-ten minority? As for gay rites, these folks seem to be in that field of endeavour. --Carlb 16:53, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rewritten. Since some fools voted me for WOTM, I figured I should make a token effort to actually write something. It is now completely different, and at least salvagable. It still needs a ton of work, but I hope I have provided enough muse that someone else can run with this. I wash my hands of it. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 20:38, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep I don't think it needed a re-write in the first place. It was sarcastic, but not in a biting or truly hateful way. As soon as we start equating sarcasm with hatespeech, we're in a bad way. Anyway, I think the new P.C. Version can be salvaged.

I dunno , the excerpt was pretty clear on its disdain for homosexuals. Not exactly sarcasm if you pretty much say "I hate gays".--Nytrospawn 23:13, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Vote for deletion

Expanded --—rc (t) 03:57, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep - submitting here was a mere formality. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:46, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite/Expand/Vandalize - I fixed it up a bit but it is still more of a sucky undic entry. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 00:52, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep, but obviously leave the template. --Spintherism 04:44, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Redirect We already have one - Uncyclopedia:Vote this page for deletion. --Famine 17:44, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep I just added two sections to beef it up to more than triple the previous size. See if you like it. --Bouahat 16:55, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Red Vs Blue

Rewritten to some extent --—rc (t) 03:57, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Factual and not funny. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:24, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite/Delete Red V Blue could be better, in the vein of Pot V Kettle. -- Nytrospawn 13:47, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I started a rewrite at point 2 but kept the original intact. I agree with Nytrospawn on this one. Is there an existing link to other court cases? --Rollo75 22:21, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Skiddleskid

Deleted --—rc (t) 03:57, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Please throw this into the skid. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:17, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete --—rc (t) 03:57, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Jason Mewes

Deadbeated --—rc (t) 03:57, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

With the cost of funny skyrocketing to over $3.00/gallon at the pump in some areas, is it any wonder that this article is out of gas? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:13, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete --—rc (t) 03:57, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Warboards.org

Yawn. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 07:17, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete/rewrite I don't know if this site is well known enough to make a rewrite worthwhile; if it isn't then just huff it. --Cap'n Ben CUN 08:07, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete --—rc (t) 03:57, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Homo

Rewritten --—rc (t) 03:57, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Totally up to you guys. Wasn't that funny, but almost could be, if it was a mother in depth look at linguistic differences or somesuch. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 22:46, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep Better than your ghey LOLOLOLO--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 00:01, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I wroted the current version to replace the original (Homo: You) entry, which filled me with unreasonable childish anger. It's mostly a poke at the foo' that wrote the first one. I vote to delete it. ----OEJ

I say keep but maybe stick a rewrite template on there so anybody with teh mUzorZ won't be inhibited. --Spintherism 05:05, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep/rewrite It's not great, but it could be much, much worse. --Cap'n Ben CUN 08:05, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Aw, the cockles of my heart is all warmed up now. I will wre-write ASAP and try for actual dysinformative humor. Homor? ----OEJ 17:14, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)
OK, a rewrite started. It's up for grabs. Somebody else do something on it, please. The MuZorZ do be departed from me. --70.58.158.38 20:00, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Looks redeemed. --OneTopJob6 00:58, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Hooray! Now is good, much. --Cap'n Ben CUN 13:25, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Vorlons

Not a candidate for undictionarying as it was previously marked, it's a candidate for being hurt - badly. --Gay2.gifIMBJRGay2.gif 22:08, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Pave over I know a good contractor with lots of connections in the cement business. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 22:48, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Wound: I take MTU to stand for "delete within a week if unfixed or unmoved" (since that is what it says, but why do users never move their dics themselves). It is a worthy topic, and should have a good article. This is not it. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 23:11, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Send it back to New Jersey in a coffin AmyNelson 18:44, 2 Sep 2005 (BST)

Deleted, made no sense, lots of errors, its been over a week since Splaka posted (sep 1) --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere Icons-world CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere 19:18, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Image:435px-Katrina Flood Overview.jpg

Deleted --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Ok, not that we care what wikipedia usually does, but Bubba Wales himself deleted the original image from the wikimedia servers citing abuse of fair use. :( --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 21:19, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Yeah, if Bubba done it, we gots to done it too --Nytrospawn 16:23, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Unless we figure out who took the picture and mercilessly mock him. But that wouldn't be nice. --Spintherism 04:20, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Jerry Lewis

Expanded since VFD'd --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Worthy subject, but article lacks a certain something, what the French call "Funny". --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 10:05, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Jesus who ever failed to make something funny with this to work with needs to turn in their Licence to kill Amuse Rewrite or delete--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:44, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete They were following the directions to funny, but I think they got distracted by a shiny thing and took a wrong turn.--86.133.156.32 13:51, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Wikitravel Logo Controversey, Wikitravel Logo Controversey, and Wikitravel Logo Controversy

Killed --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Please kill all three, the redirects and the article. Incredibly lame article. You can delete the reference to the article from here as well, if you like. Thanks. --Steve Johnsenson 04:19, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Mild Delete Article needs to provide more disinformation and improve humor quotient. Mere reference to vandals/vandal groups not funny. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:28, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I thought it was going to be good in the end it turned out boring, probably TFAODP--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:42, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

4E75

TFAODP'd --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Almost vaguely interesting, but apparently factual and not really funny. --Spintherism 04:03, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Should be 4E75'ed --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:34, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Move to TFAODP--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:36, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

If you have a problem and no-one else can help, maybe you can huff: The A-hole team. -- Codeine 18:00, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

A'Tuin

Deleted --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Blatantly ripped from Discworld. Unoriginal and unfunny. --Spintherism 04:03, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

REwrite or Delete --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:36, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Only worth keeping in protective habitat as an example of why plagarism is bad Mock or Delete --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 09:34, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 :Keep The "See Also" section saves the article. --Unissakävelijä 10:08, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Interesting place names

Defeated --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

It could maybe be an interesting article, but not with those names. Not even a chuckle, nothing. --ComaVN 14:18, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Expand/Rewrite I liked the Extra Virgin Islands, but the rest were crap. I'm sure that there are plenty of interesting names based on existing articles that could be added though. --Spintherism 14:40, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Slather with mayonaisse, then delete --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:08, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Maybe just turn into a category or just delete --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:33, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Rewrite and Merge with Category:Strange Place Names --Unissakävelijä 09:25, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Delete Wow, this is awful. --Rcmurphy KUN 05:02, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Great idea with "10 seconds" of thought behind it. Not that I've done much better with my own brainfarts, but still, it's lying on its death bed in pain, praying for someone to pull the plug. --BobBobBob 22:38, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

England

Keeped --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Someone added the VFD tag, (presumably without knowing about here).--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 00:09, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep It's not brilliant but it's not the worst eithioer it could probably do with some TLC (and please no lame jokes about bad teeth they are just lame)--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 00:09, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

KEEP Nothing wrong, and nonsensical enough for here. Winckle 22:40, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

definit keep. --ComaVN 06:49, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Shurely shome mishtake? It's not the best article on Uncyclopedia, but it certainly ain't deletion material. -- Codeine 08:10, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

rewrite it has started to fall apart fom so many edits, it could do with been re-writen from the ground up.--193.63.129.163 23:51, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

rewrite - like me, it just needs a bit of touching up 86.133.156.32 13:23, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Expand and huff Too many lists, not enough zaniness. --Poofers 05:35, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

KEEP cos it made me laugh --12.20.43.1 11:50, 21 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Julius Veselka

Disappeared --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Appears to be part of Politics of Lithuania but whomever wrote this forgot to make a funny. :( --Carlb 01:47, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete if it's not factual then it's worse.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 00:00, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Piet Hein Donner

Deleted - vote 3-1, or maybe 3-2 if rewrites count on the side of keeps, or possibly 4-1 or 4-2 if noms count as votes...anyway, it's gone --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Is this a famous person, or is this just more slandanity? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 22:18, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

He appears to be a Dutch politician. You can look him up here if you can read Dutch. --KP CUN 07:15, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
huff P. Donner is described in a two sentence article in wikipedia. Somehow, jokes about a person consuming vast amounts of drugs, even of that person happens to be the Dutch Justice Minister, don't do anything for me. --Hessef 10:09, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Oh original, Dutch Politian smoking dope!!!, What he^^^^ said, furthermore we should destroy Max Kool--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 15:55, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Please do keep the article, at any rate to 16.000.000 dutchmen it is nonsensical enough ;-) Flyingbird 19:34, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)
  • Rewrite No need to get rid of a perfectly good mockery, but the last thing we need is more "X invented Y in time Z, lol!one!"
Delete --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Tammy Saris

Whacked --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Sounds like it could be factual.

Rewrite?I'm trying to work out whether obsessive stalking of pr0n stars is funny. On balance, I think it probably isn't, unless it's done well. This isn't. --Squeezeweasel 09:26, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep I laughed at the author more than I laugh at most articles. I especially liked the google world bit. --Spintherism 22:35, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep We need more pron references on Uncyclopedia. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 21:01, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete But I NEED to delete it! If I don't delete it, I might explode. It happens to me sometimes... --Famine 00:58, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete In my opinion, somethingawful.com is proof that it's funnier to write sarcastic and (mostly) factual articles about porn than satire. --Hessef 07:38, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Abstain--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:35, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete --—rc (t) 21:38, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rinkeby

Maybe be funny to Swedes, maybe not. You tell me. --Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 10:35, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. If it was only in Swedish, we could use the new tag Flammable and I made: {{qua?}} (see it work its magic in Chechnya) - mostly meant to give pages like that a chance to splain themselves before vfd (shameful plug)) --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 10:40, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete without mercy Come on, even the name is stupid. --Poofers 05:29, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete without mercy I agree, stupid.
Gone --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere Icons-world CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 20:57, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Jonathan bishop

Delete I think most people would say this is factual and more appropriately put on his Wikipedia page! -- MonkeyGirl 17:55, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)

War Masters

Delete Seriously, what the fuck? --Poofers 05:26, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Joe Pray

Smashed by somebody --—rc (t) 05:22, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Some sort of vanity page? One line does not an article make. A picture may paint 1000 words, but these 1000 words are all boring --Rollo75 01:37, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC) It is not a vanity page.

Xerxian

Offed by somebody --—rc (t) 05:22, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

What the hell is this? This page isn't funny; it's just retarded. Please baleet it! --ReallyDeadThing 14:40, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Riemann hypothesis

Kept --—rc (t) 05:22, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I’m restoring the VFD entry, but I am voting to KEEP it. I am copying some comments I placed on the QVFD. The article is actually pretty funny for the mathematician. It’s very wrong. It perhaps just requires a mathematics PhD to understand it completely. It reminds me of the joke:

A graduate student is taking a topology oral exam. The professor asks: “Can you give an example of a compact set?” The student answers, “The real numbers?” The professor pauses for a moment. The professor slowly says, “OK. In which topology?”

This is really quite hilarious—if somewhat esoteric. --KP CUN 21:02, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

There's a joke about an engineer and a mathematian and something to do with infinite dimension, wish I could remeber it.

I also found it really funny... no need for all the articles to be understandable by everyone. Plus someone (maybe even I) will expand it in the future. --Pietro 05:11, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I'm no mathematician but I agree with Pietro that not every article needs to be understandable by everyone. However, maybe there could be footnotes to explain this particular article for non-mathematicians like me? --Ogopogo 05:16, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I think we need an award for this article. The amount of education required to produce this juvenile nonsense was exceedingly high. There are a few articles on Uncyclopedia that are as well-researched as any you might see on Wikipedia. --KP CUN 05:30, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Definite keep. --130.245.249.188 06:16, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

How about an award of "That went the fuck over our heads!"? Edit it and make it funnier at: Template:AOC. Oh, and I vote Keep if it is funny. --Splaka 06:35, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
keep The Riemann hypothesis is notorious in math circles. Mathematicians have been working on the problem for over a century. Somebody's actually offered $1 million USD to anybody who can prove it. (Hmm...if somebody wanted to make this article a bit more accessible, one could summarize the real life history of the prize and then speculate on highly unlikely scenarios that could occur after a math genius gets a million dollars.) --Hessef 07:19, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I'm proposing the deletion of the Riemann hypothesis (lower-case h) because I've merged this material with Riemann Hypothesis (upper-case H) pretty much verbatim, which makes the former redundant. Maybe it could link to the latter, I don't know how to do that. --Pietro 15:36, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

For future reference you add #REDIRECT[[Riemann Hypothesis]] to it and it will then redirect to the merged version (I've done it BTW) --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:48, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

It's too late now, but I'm going to redundantly vote to keep this. I originally put it in the quickVFD, thinking it was the work of some confused and humourless PhD student, but I'm an idiot. I agree that it's good to have some material that goes over most people's heads, but for stuff as cryptic as this, the ingenious Award of Confusion should be used. --Carlos the Mean 02:02, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Image:Jesus card2.jpg

Kept --—rc (t) 05:22, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

  • DELETE: If other people can vote to highlight this image, then I can vote to delete it.

It just isn't funny, sorry. Kevin Smith isn't funny either BTW There may be few of you that agree with me and that's certainly ok with me, but I've got to speak my peace. --Pam Johnsenson 00:46, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep I absolutely agree that Kevin Smith isn't funny (wait, did you mean the actor/director or the Uncyc page? Doesn't matter, they're both lame), but I see no particular reason to delete this image if other people, evidenced by VFP, like it. --Rcmurphy KUN 01:18, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

  • of course, if Kevin Smith is lame, then why isn't an image ripped from a Kevin Smith movie lame? I'd be interested in knowing how many images have been uploaded to uncyclopedia are swiped "buddy christ" images. --Pam Johnsenson 01:51, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I do think it's lame. And overused. But I'm not the only person here. A lot of people like Kevin Smith's tripe films so I'm willing to vote to keep an image that a lot of people may find amusing. Look, I don't think some of the nominated articles are funny either, but I probably won't VFD them because even if I don't like them, I know some people do. It's the good of the whole over the good of the individual: that's what we're all about here. Either that or amputee jokes, I can't remember which. --Rcmurphy KUN 06:58, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep -- ERTW MUN 01:28, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep We are non-discriminatory insulters here, we will insult anyone and everyone (preferably in the same article).--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 08:07, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Keep Jesus loves us and wants us to laugh at him. AmyNelson 14:00, 5 Sep 2005 (BST)

Keep Have you seen our picture for "Jeez-its"? --Nytrospawn 21:03, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

The end

Redirected --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 15:49, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rgurgitation of HHGTTG. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 23:24, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite There's an attempt to make a variety of jokes but it's going to take more than a joke about the Holy Moustache to make this a good article. --Hessef 10:02, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I've made it into a last page of uncyclopedia kind of article. Seemed like a funnier kind of plagiarism to me. --ComaVN 11:03, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

btw there's already a The End article. Redirect, maybe? --ComaVN 11:06, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Comment
There also appear to be multiple "you have reached the end of the Internet" texts, best appears to be the one in Masters of the Internet--Carlb 15:30, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Add to the template:end or something worse may grow in it's place, furthermore we should destroy Max Kool--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 15:53, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

i just redirected to the already exisiting The End article CheeseLover 05:04, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

ZFGC

Kept --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 15:16, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I place this here in the spirit of our kinder and gentler Uncyclopedia, though normally I'd huff it on sight. It seems to be vanity or slander or slandanity of a message board related to Zelda. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 22:14, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Articles about GameFAQs, apart from GameFAQs, always have more shitness than ten "average" shitty articles combined. Wait, is shitness a word? Nevertheless, at least five such articles have already been locked down on CVP, so there's a pattern of shitness, or whatever the proper term is. --EvilZak 07:10, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep - Someone went to a lot of trouble to bring this more into line with the spirit of Uncyclopedia since I posted it here. Let's leave it alone and let them have their fun, since it no longer sticks out like a sore thumb. It's more like a thumb from an alternative universe, which should fit in just fine. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:06, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I Don't Care - But there sure is a piss-load of activity. --Jenlight 08:17, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete "NOTICE: Unless you know much of ZFGC, this wont make much sense." To me, that reads: Here's some ZFGC inside-jokes that we're going to post outside of ZFGC just because we can.--Hessef 10:02, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep We let Camp Fuck You Die survive as it wasn't hurting anyone, we could do with trying to persuade them spread their net a little wilder rather than just editing one article and it's related pages however.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 12:06, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Replace with notice Ok, I am getting annoyed (and it is hard to annoy me), I think the page should be protected and replaced with a notice, for several reasons:

  • The page is full of links pointing to uncyclopedia namespace for each user (when it should probably point to user: namespace, and only for the registered users), and those pages keep getting created and then deleted (because they are zero content vanity mostly, and themselves get vandalized).
  • The users have caused problems, in some extreme cases blanking articles and admin user pages (darwin awards for them).
  • Vanity vandalizing other articles that are linked on their page, and possibly creating pages in the User namespace for nonexistant users (I am not sure).
  • They Removed the VFD notice' Indicating their disregard for us.

I think it should be replaced with a notice similar to: "This page has been deleted, for abuse of Uncyclopedia. We realize that not everyone who has participated in this page has done so, but many users here have contributed to the direct or indirect distruption of the Uncyclopedia project, ranging from simply linking to nonexistant pages that others inadvertantly create, to wholesale blanking and ban earning. If you would like a whole wikiproject of your own, please see the wikicities homepage for information on creating your own wikiproject for free." And then after such is created we can replace the page with a shorter notice and point the users to the new wikicity. Thoughts? --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 03:57, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Ok, having just perused the wikicities creation policy it is unlikely they'd get their own wikicity (unless it was for zelda in general). So maybe a link to the list of wiki hosts would be better. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 04:11, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Unwikify the names at least. That sort of thing breeds moronic one-liner vanity pages. I personally couldn't care less if the page was deleted outright, but I won't vote for a delete because it might become a decent page. --Rcmurphy KUN 04:05, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep - Message in Rot26 follows:


--Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 07:03, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Oh, and I fully agree that vanity pages linked to this page should be deleted, as well as bans for vandalism. Long bans. A vigilant eye and an iron hand outside the page, but let the page be their playground, at least for the moment.--Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 07:07, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Weak keep - looks harmless, and as for inside-jokes, I rather like the idea of this place harbouring such jokes even if most people don't get it - different strokes for ... (ack! I can't believe I was going to type that). --Gay2.gifIMBJRGay2.gif 11:51, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete
I've dewikified and restored the {{vfd}} tag, but this still looks basically like one of those pages that a group of users either creates about themselves or creates as vanity-attack against those around them. --Carlb 14:40, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete - Sorry it caused so much trouble. --DBRalph 18:47, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Have you looked in to some of those private wiki hosts? That might be just what you need. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 19:49, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep Why delete it guys are you that paffitic (spelled wrong) don't be baby boom booms just let them keep it. (21:28, 30 Aug 2005 62.45.76.161 (→ZFGC))

  • Why? Because you forgot to make a funny? Because we really couldn't care less what computer your buddy intends to buy next? Because the entire article is of no potential interest to anyone outside the one small group? --Carlb 21:36, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Do I even need to provide a reason? --ComaVN 21:43, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

DELETE I do not appreciate the utter vanity of this page and the reputation it portrays of my site, zfgc.com. DELETE!!! ~metallica48423

Delete Vandanity. Besides, inside jokes are never funny --Nytrospawn

It's become a parody of itself. It's actually gotten funny. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 22:24, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC) (Has no one used their decoder ring to decode the message?)

WEAK Keep Ok, S'd out my previous rant, now that it is unwikified and the few problem users were caught it isn't so bad, and the only user links are to User: namespace, and as MM says, it is more in the spirit of Un. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 22:28, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

It makes monitoring and damage control that much easier if we keep. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 03:53, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Bandurria

Kept --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 15:15, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

All I have to say on this one is, WTF?--Cheeseboi 14:17, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Expand/rewrite did a quick google, found the context and meh, it's alright. furthermore we should destroy Max Kool--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 15:57, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep, it's fine, makes fun of tunos. No reason to delete. --Fjim 16:29, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Homestar Runner

Rewritten --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 15:15, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Someone went to the trouble to expand this, so I didn't huff it. However, the article is crap. I doubt that anyone can write a decent Homestar Runner article without taking HR totally out of context. Homestar Runner Thompson, gonzo journalist? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 04:11, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Or maybe Jerk City Runner? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 05:17, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
In such cases of these I would tend to go for the idea that Homestar is a real person that somehow ended up as a character character. Like Michael Jackson. --Gay2.gifIMBJRGay2.gif 10:18, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I threw a rewrite tag at it but I think somebody should probably put the page out of its misery if it doesn't show some life soon. --Hessef 07:34, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I did a total rewrite, going with the Jerk City Runner gag. And by "gag", I mean choking on penis. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 17:02, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Do whatever Marco Malo thinks best,furthermore we should destroy Max Kool--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 16:01, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Images/thumb/6/67/180px-Fairy.jpg

Deleted --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 15:13, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

This is the second appearance of this (error/test?) page. I thought a good VFD tag would give the user a chance to explain their problem and ask us how to upload images (this vfd is of a test). If we just delete it, it'll probably come back. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 01:43, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)

In my opinion, it would be better to help him out with uploading images on his user talk page than on VFD. --EvilZak 06:56, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Hutspot

Kept --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 15:12, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Seems to have been created for Leiden just to host an external picture (all the text is also on the Leiden page). --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 20:48, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep. As a highpoint of Dutch cuisine, an article about something as weird as hutspot could definitly have a future. ComaVN 21:40, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Ok, thank you for uploading a pic and expanding (nothing like a good VFD to get the ball rolling!). PS: I added a bogus recipe, feel free to edit or change to be more funny and not just stereotypical (at least I left out mentions of a dyke or windmill). I'll withdraw my vote for deletion but leave this section (incase others wanna rant?) --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 21:50, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Maybe you should replace the 420s with various other euphemisms. I'd say that would increase the funny by at least 8.6.--Spintherism 17:18, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Sydney

Kept --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 15:11, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Is this canineslandanity or what? --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 20:39, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Expand there should be an article about Sydney and this could have promise if any sydney'ites want a crack at it.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 21:47, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I had a go at this but am still not happy with it. Large entries like this require multiple inputs but it's a start.--Rollo75

Channel Tunnel

Redirected --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 15:06, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Isn't the whole French Surrendering thing a little cliché by now? The other two sentences are crap also.--Spintherism 07:06, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Redirect to Chunnel --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 21:52, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

PSP Firmware 2.0

Kept --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 15:02, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete or merge with some other PSP article.--Spintherism 05:12, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep It's theoretically funny to people into videogames. --Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 10:46, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I guess if it's some sort of majorly notable update, it makes sense to keep it, but it would just seem sort of silly to have a separate page for every update of a product instead of keeping it all in a subsection of some larger article. --Spintherism 01:55, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
The joke is, if anything, about the constant need for updates/upgrades and the marketing of those updates/upgrades. ~MM --15:28, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Discordian Society

Discorded --—rc (t) 05:22, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Accurate quotes from sources, even silly sources, don't seem appropriate.--Hessef 21:45, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I'd say a rewrite is in order. --Spintherism 21:52, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Purge, delete, and don't try again. The Illumninatus Trilogy is far more insane, fucked up, and disinformative than Uncyclopedia will ever be. It is a masterpiece in its own sheer insanity. Trying to add a non-factual, somewhate coherent article to Uncyclopedia based off a non-sensical, incoherent, and inconsistent book seems doomed to failure. In wikipedia, you could at least (try to) summarize the story. Here, we discourage that sort of thing. --Famine 02:04, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Good point. --Spintherism 02:18, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Do you know who my father is?

Kept --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:59, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

The title has promise. The article, so far, does not.--Hessef 04:22, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

There's a few funny answers (and I added some myself). I recant my VfD vote.--Hessef 04:47, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Spintherism 06:02, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep -- 152.1.147.81 7:41, 4 Sept 2005 (EST)

Keep -- Cokehabit 18:20, 9 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Stock Market

Expanded --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:59, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Was QVFDed, needs extra beefy goodness, or killing from a great height --Gay2.gifIMBJRGay2.gif 12:16, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Added a little beef. Might add a little more later. --Spintherism 19:30, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Dash

Kept --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 15:00, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

This is almost funny.

Stubbed, and I vote to keep. It has potential, especially in conjunction with the two new members of The Four Norsemen of the Apocalypse. --Famine 16:49, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)

<s>

Reboot

Kept--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:56, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

It's just shit. --Caiman 15:17, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I started to rewrite it, but probably didn't really improve it much. --Spintherism 17:58, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I'm going to give my rewritten version a vote for Delete --Spintherism 03:49, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite - It has promise. --Trevie 23:55, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep/Rewrite Should be given chance. --Unissakävelijä 12:32, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite The logo is good, but the article is too short - Jordon 21:32, 7, September 2005

Environmentalism

Rewritten (I think!) --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:57, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC) Was QVFDed --IMBJR 09:42, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite/Expand The first sentence has a little gleam of potential. --Spintherism 17:45, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Loony Tunes

Was QVFDed --IMBJR 09:37, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite tagged--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:55, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Rewrite - Definitely has potential. In my opinion, it needs to be slightly more Looney Tunes-related. --Trevie 18:39, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Is this something that KP and MM want to use?--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 14:10, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Fall out boy

Died a slow, horrible death --—rc (t) 05:22, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete. this page should die a slow, horrible death. --Kennyisinvisible 19:04, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects