This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Heavy rewrite The page is under constant unfunny vandalizing and simply needs a lock or a ever vigilant watch to keep it sane. But none the less requires much rewriting to return it to a coherent and funny article. --Krystyoursavior 03:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Decent enough start, not the sort of thing I think should be in VFD. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Delete
Delete. Ouch!!! Talk about horrible!!!--Æ 22:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
In-jokes have immunity from prosecution And it amuses me, even if I don't know who Michael Clarke Duncan is. --CUNRATalk to me_ 01:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
You fools! It's an Official Uncyclopedia joke of some kind. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Strong Speedy Keep Per in-joke. I thought we had a rule about this. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 11:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh, good Lord, a philosophy article Just because I don't get it doesn't mean it's not funny. So once again I Abstain. --CUNRATalk to me_ 16:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep, poor spelling aside, it's adorable. Like me, but less so. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 10:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep It really issn't that bad. They may be the one section "Permanent Un-marriage Life" that could use some work. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 12:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep. It's not totally bad. It's on my watch list and if the jury decides the article shall live, I'll proof-read it. RabbiTechno 12:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep, especially if RabbiTechno is going to polish it up a little. --Spillin DylanTALKEDITS03:06, Nov 27
keep, not that bad - jack mort |cunt| talk - 03:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete, and if this lives, fix the god-awful formatting too, Techno. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:41, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete Oh dear. Ehhh no mAttlobster. (hello) 23:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Kill it gently It may be cute. It may be "adorable". But it isn't actually that funny. --CUNRATalk to me_ 17:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Comment - I guess people really want to keep this article because it's dealing with politics. A Wikipedia parody needs things like that. Conniving 23:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I have to agree with the tag — I like the concept, and what it has so far, a satire on foot-binding. (Why do they do that anyway?) Keep.–SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 00:17 Nov 30, 2007
Keep -- It's not offensive, reasonably well written some people might like the idea, see no reason to kill this. MrNFork you! 02:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Add women's high heel footwear pics.--Jtaylor1 03:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Baleet this is basically copied and pasted from Wikipedia (I checked) with a few terrible jokes added. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]MUNCMNSF@H (drivel) 23:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment - I'm not sure... the article looks a lot like a wikipedia one. Besides, it isn't anime. Conniving 23:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Not technically anime: it's a video game article. Granted, the art style is really anime. This was one of the first rewrites I undertook, actually. How I've changed since then. ЖKalirtotally not Wario at all 00:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
It... really doesn't seem to be that bad. Conniving 01:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
DIG Fine, force my hand. First of all, if you read the comment I posted below, you'll realize that if a category within a userspace is possible, I'd gladly include it as such. Second of all, look at the name. THINKER. If anyone is abusing this website and/or the systems herein, it certainly is not me. While you may not care about my stinking category, I can name a dozen users off the top of my head who'd gladly speak to the contrary, and I suppose I'm now going to have to have them speak up on my behalf. I care about the quality and integrity of the humorous content on this website (moreso than many other users), and this category is an extension of my continued commitment to this philosophy. THINKER'D. --THINKER 05:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep /me looks around.... So is this where they're holding the "confess your never-dying love for The Thinker" rally? Where are all the fans?... -RAHB 06:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep -- even though he's a self-absorbed prick, I don't see any reason to delete. Face it, the man knows satire. --El Jefé de Pancho 07:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. A category about a user's favorite articles should not be in the mainspace. Perhaps a move to userspace???--Æ 01:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Strong Delete Its more less an abuse of the Categorization System. If someone wants to have a personal category, then they should make a list, otherwise We don't care about your stinking category. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete, but only because there is no User category: namespace. --SirStarnestommy(Talk • Contribs • CUN) 04:32, Nov. 29, 2007
Delete. It sets a bad precedent. What next, "Modus' faves", "Pages that Ljlego thinks are keen"? Listing faves on userpages is fine; a category (or categories) of the same (or sames) is unnecessary. Sames isn't a word, by the way. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I don't believe you can have Userspace categories, or I would've done that in the first place. And regardless, it's me. It's a public service for people who appreciate quality satire. But if someone can make it self-contained, I'd be glad to have it as such. --THINKER 02:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Jesus, you are a cocky son-of-a-bitch! So much for my attempt at satire (see above). --El Jefé de Pancho 07:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Save John Constantine!. There's good stuff in there for lovers of the comic, but it's being washed under by the tides of Uncyclopedia. I'm going to try to fix it. --Geoffsebesta 01:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Needs Work Shouldn't we ICU this and give it a chance? It has minor potential. --Ggarfield 01:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Stupid, incoherent whining about some NFL player. Not funny; additionally, I count at least two terrible Chuck Norris jokes. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]MUNCMNSF@H (drivel) 23:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Smells like it too MrNFork you! 23:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Stubbsy? Stubbsy? Stubbs? heh? heh? You can't not of heard of old Stubbsy. It's Dave! Come on Dave! Stubbsy...The man...the number one! mAttlobster. (hello) 23:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
While I'm not about to keep this article, because it sucks pretty hard, I think you boys should know that it isn't vanity. Seriously. David Stubbs is probably a real person. With that in mind, carry on. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 23:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete - The only way this article has anything to do with being ignorant besides the title is it shows the author ignored HTBFANJS. --SirStarnestommy(Talk • Contribs • CUN) 23:04, Nov. 27, 2007
Delete What the spoon-bending-cat-throwing-cock-straightening funk is going on here? I mean really...What? mAttlobster. (hello) 23:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Naa MrNFork you! 23:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
"Information will come soon!" Awww... that makes me a little sad inside :( --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete & CVP. I used to contribute and maintain the page before it was first VFD'd, but cannot keep up with the volume of page blankers and vandalisms - it seems the article has a new version everyday. The same thing is happening now (a dumbass even have an edit that the article is unfair and imbalanced, how stupid). Suggest CVP after deletion. -- Gilgal1(Talk to me bitch!!!) 14:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete -- I'll be cleaning out the trash for the final time there. Other than that, this article's gone stale. --MidwayHaven 02:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
delete --Fou-Lu Fou-Lu 03:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
kill and cvp. let someone write a good version on their userpage and then protect it - jack mort |cunt| talk - 03:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Per Jack mort. -->:( 04:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
It's a real problem...Uncyc should have an article on the Philippines, being as it's a notable place and all, but the article's become a vandalism magnet. Pick the best version from the history and than protect it, I say. ----OEJ 16:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Starts off somewhat interestingly, but it's all downhill from there. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
The keep vote(s) for this article have been made possible by viewers like you --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I see a good idea here, and it's not a bad start... - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:46, Nov 25
Keep. I detect traces of a good idea and some decent lines. I'd like to see it expanded. By people like you, obviously. I'm wayyy too busy... --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 12:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep I love PBS jokes. This article is Supported by People like You. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 12:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. The usual bandcruft, complete with "jokes" incomprehensible to anyone who's never heard of them, and merely unfunny to those who have. Bleh. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 12:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
DLEEEET charming. --THE 20:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Comment What really kills this article is the Shock Image on it so beware when viewing. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 12:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Burninate.--Jtaylor1 05:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Recovers slightly after a very random opening, but never rises above the level of crap. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 13:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep This one isn't that bad. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 11:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep. It makes me want to play Mario...just not those cheap levels with the rotaty things, the electric sparkly beasties and the bees... Those levels suck. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 12:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep I actually thought this was kind of amusing. --THE 20:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I'm familiar with the rotaty things and the sparkly beasties, but I thought only DKC had bees. ЖKalirtotally not Wario at all 00:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep I like this. A LOT. It's short but very funny. Conniving 00:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete About a TV Station, Nothing funny here. --NXWave 03:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Burninate. I do not need it. Still sucks.--Jtaylor1 06:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Stub that reads like a bunch of (shudder) facts. I don't know if they are facts, but I know this article didn't make me laugh. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 11:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete Holy Cruft Batman. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 11:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Quite weird. Is it some sort of TV-nerds-only joke? See WRIC-TV article on Wickedpedia, the closest reference I could find. Note similarity in logos. ----OEJ 16:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Great Potato Hunt of 1967
Keep
Delete
Delete Some old article from 2006, No potential here. --NXWave 03:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
McDonald's
Michael Clarke Duncan
