This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Delete. It's a pretty handy rule of thumb that if an article mentions someone being born in the year 1337, it's likely to be rubbish. This is a good example of that rule. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 16:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. --MrNFork you! 18:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete Good header, but the artilc ebecomes crap real fast. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Abstain. That title mess-up made me laugh hard enough to not vote to delete. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 00:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Dead Baby Jokes
Keep
Delete
This has been tried before. Perhaps more successful this time? I don't mind the bad taste, I just think it's not even remotely amusing. --~ 12:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Someone has put some work in, but no jokes apparently... MrNFork you! 18:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete SheiKra is a better floorless coaster. Oh I mean WTF is this article, it has no mention of the coaster other than that one picture on there. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 06:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep. It's no Stampede Wrestling, with the congenial ring announcer Ed Whalen, but it's still got large men hitting each other with chairs. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 17:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep It's a nice article here but there's a problem with Red Links. Fixing those would help. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep Why deleting it? I see no reason to delete it. --Dekabreak 19:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep Agrees with Dekabreak MrNFork you! 18:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Keeeeep Jesus always was a dirty coke snorting rock fiend. Gets a but listy at the end but you have to take the rough with the smooth don't you. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep Just. MrNFork you! 18:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Not too bad. Besides, RabbiTechno's deletion reason isn't even a valid deletion reason, and the rest of you haven't bothered to give a reason as usual. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 12:53, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep I think this needs shortening, but there is amusement in here. It's well written but a little wandery. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep: It's certainly an above average article, not that that says anything given the average article but I did find a few pieces of it somewhat amusing. --Sirgwax (talk) 09:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep - Some minor rewriting, a little expansion, and some images could really help fix this up. --SirStarnestommy(Talk • Contribs • CUN) 08:41, Nov. 24, 2007
Keep I would suggest that we dicuss this over a two martini lunch, you know, run it up the flagpole and see who salutes and all that good stuff. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 20:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Those pictures have made the world of a difference. So good to see VFD work in this way! RabbiTechno 11:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Nothing wrong with it, as such; but it's been around for a year and a half with no significant humour development. RabbiTechno 20:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC) Changed my mind. RabbiTechno 11:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment - Is not having an edit for a year really a good reason for deleting something? You say that there is nothing wrong with the article. Conniving 22:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
OK, fair point. The article just struck me as really rather boring and, since Uncyc is supposedly a humour wiki, that's good enough reason to put it to VFD as far as I'm concerned. Seems a few people disagree and the article may live - that's why we have democratic vote. :-) RabbiTechno 19:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
But it does contain sentences and an idea that is workable, as oppossed to articles that just contain lists, or basic jibberish (unless you speak Jibber) Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 20:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Incidentally, prior to putting it on here, I proof-read it. Spellings and grammar should be better now. I'll accept that my personally not finding it funny says more about me than the article. Oh, and by the way, martinis are always a good idea - definitely stirred and not shaken. RabbiTechno 11:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Islam Lite
Keep
Delete
Allahu Akbar!~ 18:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
The witty bits (like Mosqdonalds and Burqa-King) are too few and far between to save it from the rest of it, which isn't witty like the witty bits, which are witty. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 18:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 21:53, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Quack I don't know why this makes me smile but it does. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete - For the last bloody time, this is what Illogicopedia is for. We should not have excessive repetitive pages. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 13:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete It doesn't live up to the last verison. Which I nominated for deletion. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 13:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 14:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Particularly love the spectacularly witty comeback to Zombiebaron adding an ICU tag at the bottom there. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 16:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete Looks like it's had some effort, but not funny to me MrNFork you! 00:58, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Uncyclopedia moderators
Keep
Delete
Smashy. First of all, it's "sysop," not "moderator." Secondly, this has far too much bile to be funny. Good idea, shit-for-execution, now recommending execution. —Hinoatalk.kun 05:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 14:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Dear oh dear. Sounds like someone had a schoolcruft/vanity stub huffed and hasn't stopped sulking yet. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 16:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Week Delete Don't actually think this is that bad (compared to what else is here), but I doubt if anyone else wants to work on it... Maybe we could keep it and point people to it to improve when they have an article huffed? MrNFork you! 00:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
SambaTV
Keep
Delete
Delete. almost all of it is lists, which aren't funny. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 05:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete A list, with words on either end to deceive you. -RAHB 07:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 14:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I get the feeling the author got the picture, and wanted to write an article to go with it. Problem is, the article's not funny, and the image isn't good enough to carry it. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 15:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Burninate.--Jtaylor1 03:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
The Mooshes
Keep
Delete
Delete Stupid Article about floors. Includes the line "this is why Windows Vista is delayed". Puh-leez. EugeneKaywuzhere(whinethank)03:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 14:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. You smell Canadian. Free prize for anyone who spots that obscure quote Methinks my free prize is safe --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 15:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
'Delete'MrNFork you! 00:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep"After the War, von Braun was taken by the military to add his expertise to a project aimed at refining the coffee maker to make it effective against coffee makers being developed by the Soviet Union."...<emoticon of smiley face> SirModusoperandiBoinc! 16:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Retain The writing is kind of mediocre, but there are too many good bits for me to bare parting with. --CUNRATalk to me_ 16:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I would consider voting for it on VFH. But I wouldn't actually vote for, unless it was to spite someone who voted delete here. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I actually found it quite funny, although admittedly the humour is somewhat irrelevant. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 13:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep. The good bits are as good as the bad bits are bad. Plus it uses words like "yeastling" and "ooziferous". SirModusoperandiBoinc! 18:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep because it was kept before in two legitimate VFD votes. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 05:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep. I voted to delete the first time, voted to keep the second...now I continue to vote keep because it's an Official Uncyclopedia Joke of Some KindTM. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete, again Mr Winkler may be gay, but that doesn't mean this is a good article. We already have lots of thissort of article. Oh, and PLEASE remember, this is Votes for Deletion, not Gigantic-Flamewar-ban-everybody-involved-for-deletion. Please keep it civil, and talk any discussion to the Village Dump or something. Thank you. EugeneKaywuzhere(whinethank)04:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
EugeneKay It's Fisher Price. Fischer Price is a whole different peice of literature. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 05:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm closing the vote. I don't like the article either, but this is the third time in two weeks it's been on here. That's ridiculous, guys. —Hinoatalk.kun 05:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Correction: Third time in 6 days! --Kip > Talk•Works•• 05:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
No good lines means that there is no reason for me to vote anything but DeleteSirModusoperandiBoinc! 16:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Sutb
Keep
*kepe I haev to dsargee wiht yuo on tihs. thsi atricle is nto a rip off of Tpyo butt itt compliments ti. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Tpyo kncok-off. --Mitch 13:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. MrNFork you! 17:52, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Dele3t I changed my vote to Delete per it being a direct rip off of Stub and I think that meets teh critieria for QVFD. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete Should this not be QVFD?MrNFork you! 17:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete I didn't see the Minimalism knock off part, but this one is bad. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Nom and Delete WTF is this Benson. Not a very funny one and contains lots of Red Links. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 08:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
DELETE THIS IS AN INSULT TO BENSONS EVERYWHERE. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 13:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
If I should die think only this of me: There is some corner of a foreign field that is forever Benson. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep Gay people are wrong! Ignore them! --THE 15:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep Slavemaster2 is a homophobe. --GeneralInsineratehymn 16:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Quick Keep Why do we have too keep voting on this one every few weeks. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep Need work, but someone must live there... MrNFork you! 18:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Strong Keep I got my tickets for next years Dayton 500. It better not get deleted otherwise I wasted my $750 a ticket on stubhub. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete - Poor, unfunny towncruft - User:Slavemaster2 - 8:31 AM 22 November 2007
The WIP has run out and it hasn't been touched since it was put on there. And it's unsavable. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
ehhhhhhh....well it had run out but since I added the VFD banner it seems to have knocked on another seven days. The indignity. It's still utterly crap though and isn't really a WIP. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:53, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
The idear is that you leave the WIP on and let it die when the admins go through a major WIP-huffing spree, not give it another chance at life by editing it. You've just given it a near-death experience. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 18:55 Nov 22, 2007
In effect you're saying I've saved Master Chief. My actions have breathed new life into the dying soul of this cancerous demon. I thought I was doing something good; thought I was saving people from the abject pain of reading this dirty prose. Yet I find now that my sword has turned against me and stabbed me straight through my loving heart. My tears are genuine, my remorse burning. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep Good start, lets not trash it. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep Nommer abstains, and I like the "analysis." Just put a rewrite/medium on it. JediBobThings I've saidThings I've done 01:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete-Too factual? MrNFork you! 18:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain - I nommed this, but changed my mind. Better than I thought originally. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 13:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
KEPT: Voting Closed - there is enough of a good idea seeded here that it shouldn't be deleted outright now. Besides, it made me laugh. --Sirgwax (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Crap. --Mitch 08:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete - I see some value in it, but it would need a complete redo. --SirStarnestommy(Talk • Contribs • CUN) 08:39, Nov. 24, 2007
Delete. Pretty terrible really. Some shining examples of random and the obligatory unfunny trivia list. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. The second I saw it had a section called "Winnipeg's gayest rappers" I should have stopped reading. I continued. Oh dear. Listy towncruft and a waste of time. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I've been to Winnipeg, and it's way less interesting than this. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 09:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 14:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Condoleezza Rice
Keep
Delete
Delete. A shitty article mixed with some randomness, facts and a bunch of crappy pictures. -->:( 19:52, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete Per above. Damn I have a hard time reading this due to the excess images. I placed the appropriate tag on the page stating it's a image whore. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
DeleteNaa thanks MrNFork you! 04:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. We should really have a page on her, but not this randumb image speckled hash-up. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Halo 3
Keep
Weak Keep I like the page in its current form done by 116.240.230.186. I would say delete the history before that edit becasue the version before is the recreated Deleted page. If this one dies in this vote, please add it to the UN:CVP, due to the constand recreations. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 08:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Week Keep Moderately decent. I fit was huffed, it would just get recreated, only it would be dumber. --THE 18:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Recreated 14 (I think I counted wrong, whatever, I'm tired) times and this article has had no improvements whatsoever since I had put it in ICU (which was 4 weeks ago). -->:( 05:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Plasma Bombardment - Nah it's pretty shit if you ask me. Also that is the actual plot...So it spoils it (Bonner) (Talk) Nov 23, 08:28
Delete. Gamecruft - not the very worst example, but the usual "it wasn't as good as I was hoping so it's shit" drivel. Consider CVP as it will be back... --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)