Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive273

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Yngwie J. Malmsteen

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Article about nobody is a hint for Anons to type anything, and they do. Everyone, use the Sandbox for this. Spıke ¬ 12:22 14-Jun-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Buuuuurn it!--Icons-flag-gr Sir Sinner blah blah 11:48, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per above. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 02:02, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful. Summed up by: "Q: Is Yngwie human?
    A: No, actually, he is a balloon full of vodka." Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:26, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 18:34, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • I bet my comment is too late because I cannot read the article anymore. I just wanted to tell Spike that a person called Yngwie Malmsteen actually does exist. Please, tell me if I misunderstood something. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:45, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
    By the way, I don't know if the article was good or not. Could Spike, please, send me a copy of it, so I can read it and maybe improve on the text? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:46, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

๐Ÿ”’ Anna Karenina H D Oldvfd

Score: 0
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The concept--novel as interactive book--is passable. Leo Tolstoy becomes Leo Gameboy and the fact that every assertion becomes conditional (depending on choices the reader made "on page 22") is a good running joke. Nominator (who, like me, prefers humor that revolves around the truth) is too bothered by factual errors such as "in Soviet Russia in the late 1700s." There was no need to tell that lie, but neither does it ruin the humor. Do create a proposed replacement article--before deleting or renaming the current one. Spıke ¬ 21:43 3-Jun-13
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I think the concept is very bad although some jokes are successful. To save them, I will move the most funny ones to the new article about the real book, which I will try to create soon. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:46, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Nominator once again unilaterally deprecates "Anna Karenina" by renaming it "Anna Karenina (gamebook)" to clear the way for a different article that he has not yet begun to write, and which maybe will be better than the original, and maybe not. I have undone the move. Spıke ¬ 22:20 1-Jun-13
  • I am afraid I do have bad luck in this forum. Well, the only choice I have now is to write about Anna Karenina myself. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:08, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
    I regret your misfortune (despite having caused it) and await the funny new article. Spıke ¬ 12:31 9-Jun-13
  • Me too, I expect something new to be written by me and it seems to me that I will begin working soon. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:48, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Elephants and Mice

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The joke's lost on me. And everyone else, I should assume. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 17:53, May 28, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The joke is per Spike, that elephants supposedly fear mice. However, I couldn't really understand the article as a whole, so, Delete --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 17:53, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per above. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:19, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. As my comments below concern the title and not any of the contents, I'll pile on. Spıke ¬ 14:17 13-Jun-13
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Huh?!?! --Icons-flag-gr Sir Sinner blah blah 14:01, June 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • The joke, I guess, is the supposed fear that elephants have of mice. This article does nothing with that; instead it makes the bold but inexplicable assertion that they have the same genome--then drags us through pseudo-intellectualism, competing theories, and the usual old 'shoops. But the topic strikes me as fixable, and the reader might like to see something at this address, if done decently. Spıke ¬ 19:02 28-May-13
    What's interesting about that old wives tale is that if you watch video of an elephant avoiding a mouse it's obvious that they aren't afraid of it, they just don't want to step on it and kill it. True. Aleister June something
  • Needs to be improved and I'm afraid I don't have the time at the moment. All ready rewriting other articles. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:27, May 30, 2013 (UTC)

๐Ÿ”’ Barbra Streisand H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The random humor has little to say about her current career as a political pundit on the web, and a lot to say about her heritage from a race of mutant termites, but I deleted the outrageously long list (which got Cat's attention when a newbie added two Big Nose items to it overnight) and the crudeness and may have rendered it saveable. Spıke ¬ 11:13 12-Jun-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Not good, but workable.--Uncycloperson (talk) 15:45, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)
  1. Symbol delete vote This is just plain terrible. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Sleeping Cat 08:59, 12 June, 2013 (UTC)<s>
Comments
  • ahahaha I went out for a hour and everything has changed :) Yeah I don't see any point of having this here anymore, someone can archive this. I don't know if I'm allowed. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Sleeping Cat 11:25, 12 June, 2013 (UTC)
  • Vote closed--nomination withdrawn. Spıke ¬ 14:03 13-Jun-13

Man Points

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. New Uncyclopedian Designguychris, as well as appending to this article's lists ad nauseam, has done us the great favor of adding a link to the website where one can purchase Man Points merchandise. I conclude that we are retelling someone else's joke about a point score for machismo; I assert that this article with all its trite stereotypes is adding no value. Spıke ¬ 01:46 11-Jun-13
  2. Symbol delete vote What about femalepoints? I failed to see the humor in this, nor have I heard of manpoints. Plus, the memes leave a bad taste in the mouth. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 03:05, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Perhaps the author meant lad points or Brownie points as they are commonly used although never heard of Man Points. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:55, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. I've only ever heard of them as lad points, not man points. Either way, DELETE. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 11:09, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listing badly to a (hopefully) quick delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ยฎ 11:24, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
    Lest returning Admins forget, it can't be quick until that clock up there strikes 24. Spıke ¬ 11:36 11-Jun-13
Comments

Nitpickers.com

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. If this is not a rant based on a personal vendetta at a different website, I don't know how the reader would tell. Insults are not by themselves humor. Creator Maniac1075 has just added a paragraph that seems to say that the website in question is now defunct anyway. Spıke ¬ 11:35 10-Jun-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I think that if we look hard enough, we shall find the hidden entringic truth. Until that can be found... --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510 14:31, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Is it a real website? Regardless, it's a piece of wank. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:06, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Like listening to the ranting guy in a bus queue, just a lot less interesting. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ยฎ 11:21, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Author is welcome to take a copy of this in his userspace; but the fact that he has done so suggests to me that he has seen my criticism and is not planning to defend the article. Spıke ¬ 15:18 10-Jun-13
  • Nah. No criticism. If you don't like it, get rid of it. Certainly not my best work.--ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 04:34, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • Vote closed. Author concedes just above. Maniac took a copy at User:Maniac1075/Nitcpickers.com [sic]. I'll move this page to User:Maniac1075/Nitpickers.com in order to preserve the talk page and the history for possible use. Spıke ¬ 14:15 13-Jun-13

History of Asian labor

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. Conceivably save-able, but unless anyone really wants to have a go, I say delete. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 10:31, June 8, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote "Chinga tu madre, cabron." Not worked on since 2006. In form: a single list of dates, with section headings seemingly added as an afterthought. In substance: I expected racial stereotypes, but there is no theme at all, just a vessel for random thoughts. No, Reverend, there is no reason to try to rework it. Spıke ¬ 10:38 8-Jun-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Unlike the article on Spam, this article is not needed as much (if at all), so salvaging it would be a job for the truly devoted. Besides, as spike said, no themes are there, and I can work well when there is a theme. --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510 14:57, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. A pair of pants. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ยฎ 11:15, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful. Direspectfully containing images of the Pink Panther movie put in a bad light. Other reasons per above. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:19, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Sealand

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful unencyclopedic nonsense. We have a better, featured version of the article here. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 05:50, May 28, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Gargantuine. Indeed, boosterism outruns facility with English in the Intro--and there is nothing but an Intro (and two lists of statistics). Spıke ¬ 13:18 28-May-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Gosh, I didn't realise that the Sealand national football team is the national football team of Sealand. How enlightening. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 13:22, May 28, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Dafuq is this? I didn't find much funny, and anyways, it needs more Hetalia references. I knew Sealand existed before I read this article, but I'm pretty sure the person who made this didn't. Huff this article like a generic orange kitten! --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510 19:44, May 30, 2013 (UTC) (And no, I'm not being hypocritical by voting delete after saying salvage articles, I said salvage articles WITH potential)
    This has no need to be salvaged as we have a better article on the same topic. This article completely disrespects one of the greatest nations of Earth. Considering that a war was fought by the local inhabitants of the defence fort to protect their sovereign state I personally believe that this disrespects their hardship and effort used to win that war by writing about dolphins and believing sealand to be some kind of water park. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:44, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Ludism

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Yet another imaginary religion! Not as bad as some previously, but still without humour (unless, as in previous cases, there are jokes for those with a basic level of general knowledge, which lately I seem to be lacking). Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 20:48, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. We all benefit from the additional context that others can provide, and especially before destroying other Uncyclopedians' work. "Luddism" (the province of "Luddites") is opposition to technology--or, in the minds of political adversaries, acceptance of current technology but opposition to progress. However, that is not the basis for this article, but rather rapper Ludacris. Force-fitting quotations from the Bible to the world of rap is a comedy strategy, but one executed here without any cleverness. This is a random walk that in 2007 produced a page no one will ever look for. Spıke ¬ 21:37 3-Jun-13
    I'm aware of the Luddites, but this article is not really related. I can't say I've ever heard of this "Ludacris". I don't think I want to, to be honest. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 13:45, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete.Per above. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 05:33, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
    Scott, remember to alter the number when you vote! Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 13:45, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per Revrend Penny --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 17:40, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Hello Kitty Vibrator

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote "Eat my dirty pussy hole!" Anon was by overnight and left this laugh riot into an article whose name means you have to know the punch line to read the joke. It's labeled a Stub, and if I had done the right thing (deleting the list that Anon added to, then the two other lists), it would be even less. Spıke ¬ 10:45 5-Jun-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A little tasteless. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 10:56, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. There's a punchline? I don't think so. --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510 20:14, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:48, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:12, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog 1,234,567,890 times.

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. SPIKE, I see your political party and raise you one piece of random, unfunny shit. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 20:46, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I saw Anon's edit (which reduced the article's listiness!) but you beat me here. This is Sandbox stuff. Spıke ¬ 20:49 27-May-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. We need to make an AHHHHHHHHH! template as I keep finding a need for it. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:24, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. No redeeming value, and I would expect the phrase repeated 1,234,567,890 times, not this crap. (Either variation is bad...). Encyclopedia Dramatica is a place for this kind of cryptic stuff. --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510 16:34, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:46, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

๐Ÿ”’ Pluto (planet) H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -1
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The existence of several inconsistent articles on the same topic is explicitly permitted. This one's Intro is a bit funnier than the other one. Also, nominator forgot to tag the article. Spıke ¬ 01:10 26-May-13
    I was 100% sure I did. I probably closed the browser before I saved, sorry. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 09:19, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. I like this one better than the other one. Plus, what SPIKE said. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 19:25, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. There's already an article on Pluto and the other one's funnier so I guess there's no reason for this one to exist --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 21:27, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • An effort to merge the best of both articles, and remove the gradual vandalism, would be a great service. Spıke ¬ 01:10 26-May-13
  • Symbol for vote For. Above comment. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:36, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nah - I think they're incompatible and an effort to merge would be awkward. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 19:25, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
  • Vote closed - Sentiment running against deletion. Spıke ¬ 10:40 8-Jun-13

CTFxC

Score: 1
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Isn't funny. Seems to be more of a fan-page. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 13:09, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Too new. Anon created this today. I don't see any redeeming value, but it's been tagged (unless Anon removes the tags again) and the site's normal cleansing process will wash it away. Spıke ¬ 13:49 6-Jun-13
  • Upon closer review (that is, getting past the tags), it is suitable for administrative deletion as vanity. Spıke ¬ 13:54 6-Jun-13

๐Ÿ”’ Plan B from Outer Space H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: 1
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I acknowledge the logic of arguments for deletion, and will not address them. Instead I will appeal with my fondness for certain bad scifi movies. I consider Plan 9 From Outer Space, along with the story of it's production, a primo example of medicinal-grade schlock. I think this article is funny because it conveys a sense of what makes Plan 9 so funny. There is humor there, if you have the eye to see. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 18:26, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
    Would it flip your vote to discover that we already have an article on Plan 9 from Outer Space, which nominator has just fixed up a little? Spıke ¬ 20:07 24-May-13
    Already saw that. No, I feel that the title of the actual film begs the question, "what about the other plans?" This piece of nonsense answers that question. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 20:19, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Zim speaks with wise tongue. Aleister oo:25 4-6-'13
Delete (3)
  1. I find it hard to come up with a simple reason for the deletion of ths article. As far as I can see, it's flawed from conception to publication. NRV.                               Puppy's talk page10:21 24 May 2013
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A "Plan B" will inspire Anon that there are 25 remaining slots in the alphabet for his own unfunny Plan, and I see that nominator has found a couple of these. A list of what is left of this story arc from 2005 is contained in the article. There is no humorous content in this article aside from the fact that author has tried to create a funny article. Spıke ¬ 11:47 24-May-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. What is the point of this text? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:51, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • I can't vote either way on this one. It's in dire need of a cleanup, fo' sure. And it needs a lot more funny. I just don't have the heart to put it out of it's misery --TheDarthMoogle (talk) 20:36, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote Abstain. I respect parody articles and seeing as I have never heard of Plan 9 from Outer Space I don't know how good or bad it is. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:24, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Crimson Sun Empire

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another cult forms inside Uncyclopedia. Join now, learn The Commandments, and add your name next to Chuck Norris and THE chish. Spıke ¬ 00:47 3-Jun-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per Above. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:13, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. More of the Ye Olde Crappe still hanging about. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ยฎ 06:36, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Why did this not get put through QVFD at the time of its creation? Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 13:23, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. No son, this article IS qvfd, and we have too many user categories as it is (I'm assuming thats what this is, as the article was incoherent a bit) --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510 18:57, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

๐Ÿ”’ Fashion design H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: 0
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Not a classic for sure but not bad enough for deletion in my view. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ยฎ 06:50, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Not quite delete worthy, but could certainly use a rewrite. -- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 02:46, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
    A rewrite either breaks the creator's plan or is a new article. Again, bad writing is his humor strategy. Spıke ¬ 02:57 1-Jun-13
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Okay, so creator World fashion (I cannot call him author) in 2007 found a website in India with truly numb essays on fashion design, probably to sell luxury accessories to Indian women who think it's chic to deal in English they don't understand. So he copypastes all the website's subpages into a single Uncyclopedia article with an external reference to, guess where? The photos are spoofs but there is no other original humor on the page. We are not a catalog of funny stuff available somewhere else, especially when the only "funny" is their poor understanding of English. Spıke ¬ 01:00 31-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I couldn't find much of value in this article. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 19:26, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Found when Anon came to the same conclusion but opted for page-blanking. Spıke ¬ 01:00 31-May-13
  • Vote closed. Support by two Admins suggests that the deadlock won't be broken. Spıke ¬ 21:45 3-Jun-13

๐Ÿ”’ Charlie Brown's A Series of Unfortunate Events H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -1
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Click on the {{Wikipedia}}. This article, using an extremely random sense of humor, tries to morph the dark Lemony Snicket series about orphans onto the light-and-cheery Charlie Brown comic strip about the kids next door. It doesn't have photos and it's not a laugh riot, but it's a real article, about something real, with a real comedy strategy. Spıke ¬ 20:25 2-Jun-13
Delete (0)
  1. <s>Symbol delete vote Delete. Not outrageously bad, but I didn't laugh at any point. Maybe someone more familiar with the topic could tell me if it's worth keeping. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 20:06, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
    I believe they call it American humo[u]r. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:13, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  1. Former Symbol delete vote Delete. If others understand the joke, and like the page, consider my objection null and void. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 20:29, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Eli, pulp heroine, dame of vengeance, and shining light for slick chicks everywhere.

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't know if anyone actually understands this one. I certainly don't get it. Someone removed construction tags several months ago, but it either isn't finished or just lacking a single joke. The title's annoying as well. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:18, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. That is some damned fine gangland-style English writing, lacking only some key hyphens, that even outweighs the recurring, trite, "little-is-known" strategy. However, from Google and Wikipedia, I can't state that this article is about anything. An editor who dramatically renounced this website states in the History that "I have it on good authority that [Septicmeatball] is coming back to finish it. So hands off." But he would certainly have lobbied Septicmeatball to renounce the website as well. I say we give it up. Yes, I did not notice any jokes; and yes, the title's annoying as well. Spıke ¬ 23:34 29-May-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. GAH! First of all, that exists? Second of all, it looks incomplete, smells incomplete, tastes incomplete, and sounds incomplete, therefore, it is incomplete. Plus the subject matter is so vague, it has no hope of salvagability. Plus, the title is stupid. And even the worst shitshounen anime/manga nowadays is still marginally better. --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510 19:40, May 30, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Demolition request. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ยฎ 06:52, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. BANG! And the article is gone. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 05:46, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

๐Ÿ”’ HowTo:Contrive a ridiculous acronym H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Originally: Trying too hard to make an acronym fit a pre-chosen word

Score: 2
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I know it is awful but that is because of the content and humour. The concept is fine and very good comedians can make something like this funny. It can be fixed with improvement and probably needs to be a HowTo (HowTo:Try to hard to make an acronym fit a pre-chosen work). It requires a bit of effort from a user. Unfortunately I have exams at the moment and I don't think I am good enough to make this funny (I could give it a try next week if it is still around). I vote to keep it to give inspiration to what could potentially be a great article. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:41, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Occasional votes that read, "Put it in my userspace and maybe I'll work on it" are unhelpful. Your vote that, if I may paraphrase, "I know it is awful but I am voting to support good writing, only I am not going to be the one doing it, just now," is less helpful. If you agree it is awful and cannot improve it while the vote proceeds, you are free to "give it a try next week" even if it is not still around. Spıke ¬ 17:15 20-May-13
    I just thought maybe someone else could write it as there are many good writers and it is a fun subject to play with. It has too much potential to be deleted even though the style of humour currently is forced as you said. I am not changing my vote as I found the concept funny enough. Everyone has different humour styles. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:27, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
    That is a better rationale. Spıke ¬ 17:32 20-May-13
    Sorry I struggle to write clearly sometimes. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:35, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. I agree with ScottPat, as the concept seems good, but the writer wasn't. Oh, and also agree with the "it should be a HowTo" thing. --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510 19:47, May 30, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The title sums up one of the ways pubescent authors write crappy articles. The content is a list of examples. Anon just devised C.U.N.T. today--charming. Spıke ¬ 00:21 20-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. My wife is currently making me a ham, egg and cheese sandwich. That sandwich, as yet unmade and nonexistent, is a better article than this miserable piece of whale dreck. It deserves an undignified death. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 16:49, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. All of the good acronyms belong in their respective normal articles, not in a collection that is a target for vandalism. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 21:01, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. No comments. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:53, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • The Intro tries its hand at authentic humor--but its topic, the U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act (whose title was overt manipulation) is treated superficially and with humor that is just as forced as the examples that follow. Spıke ¬ 00:21 20-May-13
  • Kept--Renamed to HowTo: namespace as the Keep votes agreed, and repaired. Spıke ¬ 14:36 2-Jun-13

๐Ÿ”’ Spam (electronic) H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I don't like causing conflict, but this is again, Uncyclopedia. This is the a page on spam, and trust me, I've seen spam (in IRC). I do think some maintenance is needed on the page, but deletion would be a bit too far, as there have been many pages deleted, we need to keep the ones we still have, otherwise, we would soon have very few pages. Instead of deletion, I think (and this can be applied to other articles) we should encourage upkeep of article, and smile upon those who do so. This would make the uncyclopedians here more inclined to be active, and they would be more inclined to contribute. Just a suggestion... --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510 19:36, May 30, 2013 (UTC) (Because, KTHXBAI)
    I think Spike will have a few critisisms to say about this comment which would probably hurt you to hear them. I'm going to take a gamble and tell you what I think Spike would say in reply but dumb it down with some British Diplomatic calmness:
    We will not have very few articles left as Uncyclopedia has 30,000 so it would take rather a long time to delete them all especially on VFD. VFD is essential for maintaining the quality of articles on this site. Besides more pages are created than deleted every day so there is a net growth in articles.
    If you think it can be improved then don't just sit there and talk but please instead spend time on improving it. As you say you have experience relevant to the topic this would help aswell.
    I am sorry if Spike does not agree with this comment and I don't want it to sound like it comes from his thoughts. I'm just attempting to soften the impact. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:23, May 30, 2013 (UTC)
    A fine way to avoid it sounding that way is to stop dropping my name. In fact, the only involvement of DSA510 or his other socks was to move a prank line near the start of the article (which I removed entirely) with a scoldy Change Summary that hardly shirks from conflict. This article is not defensible as "in the style of the thing it's about"; it is much more sloppy and inconsistent than the thing it's about. We are creating articles faster than we are deleting them, and we have been deleting articles this ugly for years. Spıke ¬ 21:24 30-May-13
    Cleaned it some more, got rid of listcruft and tidied up the 13375P34k, but again still needs some more work. (It would be nice if anyone who is free could do some maintenance, just a suggestion, not a demand) --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510 19:12, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. The page is ugly, true, but check out all the red links that would be created if we delete this page. This page needs a rewrite, not a delete. -- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 02:49, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
    The rewrite, DSA510 is doing, slowly. But the red-link issue is overstated, as many of these are simply articles that have {{Tasty}} at the end. Spıke ¬ 02:59 1-Jun-13
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep. Not the cleverest of jokes, but worth keeping in my opinion (though some of the listier bits at the end should go). Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 16:37, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Whoops! Maybe you were looking for Encyclopedia Dramatica? On the contrary, maybe this article needs to be traded there for future draft picks. This is a cluster-bleep where the authors compete to see who can type the rantiest, ugliest, over-the-top text. It is not a clever parody of deceptive marketing by email; it is not clever at all. Spıke ¬ 16:06 30-May-13
Comments
  1. Kept, and second VFD save... now fr33 v14gr4 ch33p!!!! (jk) --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510 23:52, June 1, 2013 (UTC)

Great grease fire of 1812

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I saw this linked to on the anniversaries on the main page, looked it up, and found it to be predictably shit. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 19:26, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The comedy strategy of this article from Uncyclopedia's first year is to render a slapstick comedy with explosions and deaths playing out in the author's mind; also to regale the reader with random articles (from the Intro alone: unicorns, a midget, cocaine, and an obscure US President). It is short and pointless. Spıke ¬ 19:42 31-May-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per above. ---- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 02:43, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per above. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 05:39, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. What I found in this article, is all the jokes Uncyclopedians use the most put all together. I have never seen such a mess before (well, only when I looked at my table right before the exams). Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:52, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Maximum Seriousness (German Surrealist)

Score: 1
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A poor translation of God knows what. I don't think it's worth keeping. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 13:11, May 28, 2013 (UTC)
    God knows what? The 2006 talk page disclosed that the page is about Max Ernst, and that the poor translation was the joke; "Maximum Seriousness" is how Google translates Max Ernst. Now all the reader has to do to find the Uncyclopedia article on Max Ernst is feed the name through Google Dutch-to-English, something that should occur to him naturally! The lack of photos and other untidiness are other issues that were unaddressed in 16 months. "This is a site for original comedy writing" and passing a foreign-language page through Google to manufacture an Uncyclopedia article still doesn't have the required creativity. Spıke ¬ 13:35 28-May-13
Comments
  • Vote closed. A {{Fix}} tag on this unrefined spork from a Dutch wiki is now 16 months old and I declare it expired. Spıke ¬ 13:23 28-May-13

Order of the Communist Pear

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pennyfeather, I see your nonsense religious sect (below) and raise you one nonsense political movement, infatuated both with things Soviet and things pedophile. Spıke ¬ 03:03 27-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 11:27, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Unless it is a very good parody but I gather it isn't. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:43, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Good find. Regardless of whether it was meant as parody, it doesn't make people laugh. It failed. And now it must pay the price! Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 21:09, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not that good. Everyone knows that communists are against capitalists and that there are actually several people who want to restore the USSR (not me). Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:56, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Cakeism

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Why are people so obsessed with random, made-up religions? I don't think this is resurrect-able. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:33, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Indeed not. Why have a template (at the top of the article) that apologizes in advance for listiness? Just don't do it! To Hell with this article. Spıke ¬ 01:06 27-May-13
    Mnbvcxz noted (at QVFD) that this is that template's only use. Not any more. Spıke ¬ 11:43 27-May-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. listcruft, with a mandatory litany of the memes. --Mn-z 11:30, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:45, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Whoops! Maybe you were not searching for this? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:46, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

๐Ÿ”’ Boxes H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 11:17, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Shame it's been slowly destroyed after all the years of neglect --TheDarthMoogle (talk) 11:36, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Reading this gave me the mehs. It's like an awful scifi film that doesn't know it's awful. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 04:23, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. I understand why this article may be funny but it completely destroys the concept of Uncyclopedia and, in addition to this, offends the reader. I was not searching for boxes! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:49, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. New "Box" article being re-written. This article does not contain a police box, it must be deleted. Delete! Delete! Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:45, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Responding to Moogle, I have rewound this article to March 2010 and done a light copy-edit. I don't like articles where the author focuses on himself, but it might work given the thesis here--that the article's subject is inescapably boring. Would nominators please get in the habit of explaining why they want us to vote to delete someone else's work? Spıke ¬ 11:59 21-May-13
  • Good humour to it. I am copying into my user space to sort out its unencyclopedic nature. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:39, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
  • Ok I take that back only the pictures are funny. However I am completely redoing the writing and should be finished soon. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:08, May 26, 2013 (UTC)
  • Deleted; to be replaced by ScottPat rewrite. Spıke ¬ 16:54 26-May-13

๐Ÿ”’ Anna Pavlova H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -1
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. A stubby article from 2005 was tagged "No Redeeming Value" and expanded by Neca (I never met him) in 2006. The absurdly long section heads do seem to be a recurring gag, though what this has to do with Anna Pavlova I don't know. Read the initial photo caption: This is no mere hacker. The writing uses randomness, but an erudite randomness rather than memes. All it needs is another photo, fixing the red-links, and more relevant humor from an author who actually knows something about Pavlova. Anton, ready to earn a VFD Save? Spıke ¬ 13:56 19-May-13
    I can try to. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:59, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. It's a proper article in need of some love. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 16:58, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Can I move it to my user space and then try to make it better? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:15, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
    You can copy the text to your userspace, like the text of any other page. Moving an established article out of mainspace requires a vote of this forum (which is not going well). You are free to install your edit over this article, or in place of it after it is deleted, but you should run it by someone else first; you are not free, for example, to install essentially the same thing if VFD should vote to delete it. Spıke ¬ 17:32 20-May-13
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The titles of the sections are too long and too unfunny. On the contrary, the sections themselves are too short and ... unfunny. All in all, this gives us a badly written, untrue and unfunny article. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:33, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Vote closed. No groundswell to delete after five days. Spıke ¬ 18:22 24-May-13

Vandalize Wikipedia Day

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The execution recurs to Chuck Norris and Oscar Wilde and names specific Uncyclopedians; that is, another in-joke. And regarding the concept: After what we went through last week, this strikes me as just as unfunny as an article on assassinating a head of state. Spıke ¬ 20:03 20-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I agree. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:15, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I agree. It is not that funny. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 05:44, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Dreadful stuff. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 11:22, May 23, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Wacky wars plus vandalism = fail. -- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 21:11, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • By all means, feel free to kill this embarrassment before it spreads. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 11:22, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

HowTo:Vandalise Wikipedia

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is the above "humor" with step-by-step instructions. If 2% of readers laugh (and I think that's charitable) and another 2% take it as a mandate, the result is still unacceptable. Spıke ¬ 11:43 23-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. It is funny in some parts and is true in several others. I would really appreciate those points if the article was talking about something else. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:21, May 23, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article eats babies. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 04:15, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per SPIKE's comments above. Just not funny enough, plus a few may decide to actually go for it, which is undesirable. -- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 21:14, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Huffing expedited, as three Admins align and it would not be hard to find others. Spıke ¬ 11:58 26-May-13

End of the Internet 2012

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The authors experience the joy of conducting a vulgar rant at the readers. I cannot imagine the readers laughing at all. Spıke ¬ 03:08 19-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. This conspiracy rant had some potential in early 2012, but it has outlived its usefulness. It is obsolete now, as noted by the late awkward addition near the bottom of the page that says that the destruction of the internet as we know it will be complete by 2030. Also, it assumes that everybody uses services like DeviantArt, (which happens to be a website to showcase art including terrible fandom porno art and view art that others have posted) and so on. The internet is broad enough in scope and changing quickly enough that this article will be obsolete again in no time, and will be forever incomplete even if an update is attempted (something perhaps suggesting that the internet ended in 2012 but was restarted). -- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 00:35, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Let's add in some jokes about George Bush. And maybe something about the Falklands war. And the Chinese building a wall against the Monguls. Timely humour needs to be both timely and humour. Fails on both counts.                               Puppy's talk page04:48 20 May 2013
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Apparently there is a much better treatment on the subject here. This one is awful and delete-worthy. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 17:27, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Yup, Hipster (writing as Hypster) on the talk page praised the "original" article by Funnybony over this rendition by Mr-ex777--which, by the way, saves all but one of the illustrations. The article under vote here was actually begun earlier. Spıke ¬ 18:20 24-May-13
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I am tired of voting against. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:42, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
    As Jesus once said about ministering to sinners. Few saintly articles, however, come before this tribunal. Spıke ¬ 18:20 24-May-13
Comments
  • Symbol neutral vote Abstain. Great concept however a bit old now...outdated I mean (so 2012). Very unencyclopedic. I would say that it just needs improving but then the apocalypse is over so what's the point? Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:44, May 19, 2013 (UTC)

Dementia

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete.--Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 20:36, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Start over. This article, if done right, should be more than an excuse to dabble in incoherency. Spıke ¬ 22:50 17-May-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. It could be funny but terrible grammar (as you can see even I noticed it) and the absence of any other jokes except for memory loss spoil everything. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:31, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Adele-te Ignoring the ignoring of framework, first person articles can sometimes work. Dementia would work better as an encyclopaedic style with repitition to the effect that the author has forgotten what is being said. To quote Kryten โ€œKryten personal black box recording. Time: unknown. Location: unknown. Cause of accident: unknown. Should someone find this recording, perhaps it will shed light as to what happened here. My short-term memory has been erased. This, I ascribe to the proximity of the magnetic coils from Starbug's rear engine. Secondly, due to the proximity of the magnetic coils, my short term memory appears to have been erased. This, combined with the erasure of my short-term memory, has left me a little disoriented, disoriented, disoriented.โ€ Given that this topic has the potential of a strong article, a lukewarm one in it's place seems a shame. Bulldoze, and make way for something better. Without meme driven humor.                               Puppy's talk page04:45 20 May 2013
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. *yawn* Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 04:12, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

It's not encyclopedic but still kind of funny. I'm abstaining. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:39, May 17, 2013 (UTC)

People's Glorious Republic of Uukumbamabahalarata

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article from 2005 is a receptacle for whatever unclever Randumbo you want to type. Spıke ¬ 19:14 17-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A completely fictional country where all the Uncyclopedia (worst) jokes are situated. In addition to this, it is impossible to pronounce the article's name. Its creator wanted to make a parody on an average African country but didn't really achieve this. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:18, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
    Yup; and the right way to do this and maintain our encyclopedia faรงade is to pick a country and parody it. Only, that constrains the author to parody something real, rather than go completely freestyle. Spıke ¬ 19:52 17-May-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful. Why don't they ever learn what encyclopedic means. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:23, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Bleargh!                               Puppy's talk page04:37 20 May 2013
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Kill it before it opens a portal to a hell dimension, whereupon unspeakable beasts will chomp upon our entrails. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 04:09, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Feroze & Suleiman

Score: 5
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. This article is okay, yet needs tidying in the quotes dept. later on and a few minor changes to get readers to go 'aha, this is a bunch of bollocks!'. I don't see this as a vanity article as, well, the company clearly doesn't exist. --TheDarthMoogle (talk) 08:52, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
    The fact that the company doesn't exist is the very proof that authors are not writing about anything but themselves, that is, vanity. Spıke ¬ 11:31 9-May-13
Delete (6)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is not poorly written; but Google has only two exact matches for this alleged consultancy: We are the first, and the second is a stub article at a business locator that "located" this business through Uncyclopedia. Codeine's Mum never worked there. It's a vanity project of a small clique. Spıke ¬ 23:56 7-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Concur. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ยฎ 13:48, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I agree with Spike as I saw Codeine's Mum the other day and she said she hadn't heard of it. Also why are the staff members the KKK? Random and pointless.Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 05:49, May 10, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Shame someone wasted so much time on it. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 16:14, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm not convinced on the vanity angle - reads more like a fakey topic than personal glorification to me. But it is randumbo of the highest magnitude.                               Puppy's talk page04:30 20 May 2013
  6. Symbol delete vote Delete. It is one of the most boring articles I have ever read. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:39, May 24, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Sprite comic

Score: 6
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (6)
  1. Crap to the highest extreme. And now being used as a justification to create more crap.                               Puppy's talk page10:37 21 May 2013 10:37, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
    Crap articles do attract crap edits and that is why I strive to gut out listcruft wherever it accumulates. The fact that a user cited this article as an excuse to create another bad one, however, says little about this article. Spıke ¬ 11:47 21-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 11:14, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Interesting concept, piss poor execution. --TheDarthMoogle (talk) 11:38, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote WHAT? YOU FDONT LIKE IT? YOU FAGG!!!!!!!!! GAY FAG The article's concept (that its subject, someone who creates sprite comics via web service, is a moron) is all right. However, calling someone a moron, a Republican, or a GAY FAGG, must be done with innovation and cleverness--not just by being thoroughly moronic, even if it is "in the style of the thing it's about." Spıke ¬ 11:47 21-May-13
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Blindly following Spike's instructions Having checked out this dreadful page and the sub-genre of Sprite Comics, and considered the matter in light of the fact that gaming and anime hold all the allure of an absinthe hangover for me, I say kill it quickly. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 12:10, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
    And voter knows whereof he speaks, at least with respect to absinthe. Spıke ¬ 12:14 21-May-13
  6. Symbol delete vote Delete.Just thought I'd join on the end! Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:19, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Voters are reminded (by the clock in the upper right corner) that recent rules prevent the execution of the vote (that is, the execution of the page) in less than 24 hours. Spıke ¬ 12:17 21-May-13
  • I've asked Rev. Zim ulator, the site's most notorious creator of sprite comics (they used to overrun UnNews) to consider writing a better page by this name. Spıke ¬ 11:47 21-May-13
    • I'm really not sure what the point of the page is, beside being a receptacle for poopies. I have taken a gander at wikipedia:Bob and George, a supposed exemplar of the sub-genre. I am not impressed. In fact, I find them kinda stupid. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 12:10, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

Worst 100 Ways of Being a Dick

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This page can amuse in two ways: (1) Let Anon name a playground pal who is a dick, and (2) let Anon name an opposition politician who is a dick. Amusing to the hack editor and of no benefit to the reader; this is why we strive against listcruft in general. Spıke ¬ 11:37 14-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The list is too long to be read carefully, in addition to this it is not funny at all. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:15, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
    I endorse this comment on Anton's talk page but note that it is hardly unique to this article. Spıke ¬ 16:43 16-May-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete.If there was a vote for execution then this so-called article would be number one on my list and number one of the list of my new article: 100 ways of writing dickish articles, which I made up just now after seeing this. I'm surprised that the article itself wasn't on the list. It's mutilated head should be displayed on the main page as a warning to any IP vandals popping by. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:21, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. I considered editing it to include ScottPats suggestion that the article be on it's own list. When I saw what a troll magnet it was, however, I begged off with the excuse that I feared it was catching. Kill this thing immediately! Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 14:55, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete.. NRV.                               Puppy's talk page04:34 20 May 2013
Comments

๐Ÿ”’ Finnegans Wake H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: 0
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It's written in the same style as Finnegans Wake is. In that respect, it's funny. -- HIPSTER T)alk C)untributions B)an 15:09, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. WWJJD? -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep. I agree with Hipster here. Though it's in dire need of a fix, I don't believe it warrants a blank slate. --TheDarthMoogle (talk) 07:42, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Multilingual gibberish (by 2005 editors, then Matthlock), apropos of nothing. Spıke ¬ 15:36 16-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Just seeing that the first word has no capital letter is bad enough!!! Absolute gibberish. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:46, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
    This stuff is easily fixed, and a page-in-the-style-of-the-thing-it's-about is appropriate. But James Joyce's prose, though "experimental," was not gibberish. I'd vote to defend deliberate, clever gibberish as satire of real gibberish; the present article is just a sandbox. Spıke ¬ 16:43 16-May-13
    I have to admit I know nothing about the topic and simply judged by first read. Didn't realise it was a satire of someone's book. My point stands that it still is a bit random. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:05, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I would certainly vote for the deletion of this article if Hipster didn't put his comment which forced me to type "Finnegans Wake" in Google. Now I understand that it is a parody on the book. However, I still vote for its deletion as this article is still "multilingual rubbish". Its concept was not realized. Article on "J.D. Sallinger" is also a parody on Sallinger's writing style but it is very interesting and funny to read. Finally, the Russian sentence did not make any grammatical sense. Maybe Uncyclopedia needs an article on Finnegans Wake but definitely not this. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:25, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
    Wikipedia is a useful place for research on this; WP:Finnegan's Wake is the drinking song; WP:Finnegans Wake is the work of fiction, complete with pundits' opinions on the meaning of his omitting the apostrophe. Spıke ¬ 22:57 18-May-13
Comments
  • No consensus to delete. Would one of the supporters please step up and give this article a little bit of cleverness? Spıke ¬ 12:23 20-May-13

๐Ÿ”’ Check If You Are The Polackophob! H Tag Oldvfd

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ranty stereotypes about Poles and their diaspora is disguised as a self-test to reveal the same (certainly not disguised as an encyclopedia article, in which the same stereotypes could be made funny with a little work). An early and ill-advised work of veteran Uncyclopedian Ptok-Bentoniczny. Spıke ¬ 11:39 15-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I can think of a many more much funnier ways of making fun of Polish people that don't involve thinking that they are all Jewish. As for lists... Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:24, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. As I can see the purpose of this article is to convince a reader that he hates Polish people and then swear at him because he is such a person. Several jokes could be good, if put into a normal article. Test just makes them unfunny. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:39, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is an excellent article for Illogicopedia, but not suited to Uncyc sophisticates and aficionados. Please, when this thing is euthanized, would the executioner kindly move it to my userspace? I may contact the author to see how he feels about submitting it to ?pedia. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 15:00, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Userspaced. Although Zim's very return raises hope we could return to the traditional 5-vote quorum, his solution is fine, and one that can be implemented on only 4 votes--and no support for the article in 5 days. Spıke ¬ 15:21 20-May-13

๐Ÿ”’ Genius Factor Games H Tag Oldvfd

Score: 0
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I think this article should be deleted.... but only when its author will finish it, so we will be able to judge if it is a vanity or not. Did you visit its history: it says it was created yesterday. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 08:29, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
    I did in fact visit the history. The construction tag wasn't put there by the IP that made it, and I will scrawl "fancy that" into my forehead with a drill if they every come back. --TheDarthMoogle (talk) 08:55, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Let's just wait and see. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:50, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Then, Moogle, you would have seen that the tag was placed by Admin Simsilikesims. In view of this, you ought not try to delete the page on any forum, but make your case to her (as I have now done). Spıke ¬ 15:27 20-May-13
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Vanity article fo' sure, probably should've put it on QVFD --TheDarthMoogle (talk) 07:50, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Vote closed. READ THE DELETION RULES--follow the link at the top of this page. Token 2-hour ban for nominator. Spıke ¬ 12:23 20-May-13

Agent 47

Score: 6
Keep (0)
  • Keep It is a good article for showing new users what not to do with an article and how not to create an article. It's got a gay attack, it's got really long, useless lists, the agent is an idiot and he is the reader (insults), the agent has auper powers, it's completely off topic and no one would type in Agent 47. The only thing it doesn't have is swearing (didn't see any) but some edits could take care of that. Just move the article to a more appropriate name like, "Article that wants to be deleted" or "Agent 47's vandal attack on an Uncyclopedia article" and you have a good parody. I laughed lots because it was so bad I had to accept that it was a parody of a bad article (which it wasn't (I don't think)).
    If you also agree that it should be a parody of an appaling Uncyclopedia article just tell me and I'll give it some minor editing to finish it. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:54, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
    You had me going back to the page history (as nominator is supposed to do!) to ensure that this isn't a deliberate creation of one of the Old Ones that parodied bad writing so well as to prank Rocko. It is not. Please don't spend much time doing deliberately bad writing. There is enough of this already on the site, much of it referred to at Uncyclopedia:In-jokes. Spıke ¬ 21:20 13-May-13
    In that case I shall change my vote. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:21, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (6)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Crimes against humor The preceding unsigned comment was added by RockoRocks (talk • contribs)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A tour-de-force of everything people do who can't write humor: Article about nothing, serial listing of memes, pranking the reader with {{USERNAME}} (though author mistakenly uses {{USERLINK}}), mentioning gayness and gore for instant laughs, then interminable lists on needless topics such as "people he murdered." Spıke ¬ 21:16 12-May-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Eye-gougingly bad. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 16:14, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. There are already numerous examples of what not to do with an article on carlb's mirror, and this belongs in that archive along with numerous VFD non-survivors already there. ---- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 01:44, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete.. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:21, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is the article which no one will read until the end simply because it talks about everything at the same time (which means that it talks about nothing in particular). No idea why it was named Agent 47. Not well written. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:11, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Wohnzimmer

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Just came across this on the proofreading list. I don't think any amount of work can save it, to be honest. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 21:56, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listy and borderline vanity. -- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 01:49, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Let me summarize the concept: This is a fictional religion, based on "the almighty Wohnzimmer" (author, presumably, who was some Anon in 2006), with 3 adherents, about which Section 1 begins by telling us, "This is boring." Spıke ¬ 03:22 14-May-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Spike summed it up well. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:16, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • OMG what kind of crap is this? thats not funny to anyone--Knรถdel 17:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
  • The preceding is the article's talk page, which technically we are not to count as another Symbol delete vote Delete. Spıke ¬ 03:22 14-May-13

George Dubya Bush

  • Now redirected to George W. Bush to avoid hundreds of red-links (though they are all double redirects)
Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is mixture of advocacy and randumbo. The article references an in-universe that only exists in the writer's mind, and throws random insults at George W. Bush. You can't make fun of Bush Jr. for being a gay Eskimo, but this article tries. If we need an attack article against George W. Bush, this isn't it. --Mn-z 19:45, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete.There is no such negative here as "advocacy". Randumbo, yes, there you've got this page by its tail. About a hateful man, and I didn't need to look at it much to vote to sink that ship. Aleister 22:06 7-4-'13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete.There is already a page on Bush that depicts him (satirically) as a great President so delete this one as it is over the top fantasy and not encyclopedic. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 11:45, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Aleister defends "advocacy" against it being grounds for deletion, because advocacy is his business, from his hatchet-job on Ann Coulter (She is so hideous that anything said about her is funny?) to his recent photo collage to show that the US Air Force is engaged in murder. In fact, an article written to convince rather than amuse should be written somewhere else (as Aleister does anyway). I tirelessly argue against the Omnipotent State--but not here. My problem with this nomination is that, for both Bush and Obama, we have tolerated multiple articles with multiple, incompatible approaches. The Dubya article is definitely more churlish than Bush's "official" page here, but we have tolerated that for the simple reason that it keeps the churls away from the real one. Spıke ¬ 14:33 9-Apr-13
    Sticks and stones may break my bones (depending on the size, velocity, and fragility of the sticks, and the size and velocity of the stones in connection to where they hit me on the body - some bones are bigger than others and less likely to break from casual contact with sticks and stones.) but words will never hurt me (unless that one time in band camp where I was dressed down for wearing my marcher's hat backwards). Aleister 12:17 First day of The Masters '13
    p.s. Upon rereading the David Coulter article, it's not a hatchet job as much as an honoring of a great comedian and character actor. "Ann" (David's character) has a habit of writing hatchet jobs on what she terms "liberals" or "progressives" with book titles such as Demons, Baby Killers, Walking Cow Dung, and Havoc, Haters, and Satanic Holidays. He is very funny.
  • Well, the page is linked to extensively by other pages, and some articles just stagnate. --The Infinite Otaku Emperor 02:41, April 12, 2013 (UTC) (I can't figure out how to link my sig to my crappy page!)

Great Time Travel War of 1871

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is a wacky-war about nothing and everything if I ever saw one. --Mn-z 15:59, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. In the boldface-heavy Intro, author reserves the right to write about everything that "was ever or ever shall be"--and ensures that virtually all readers click to somewhere else. (By the way, Oh, What a Lovely War was a provocative anti-war movie; but, after using it in a Wildeism, author drops it in favor of no theme at all.) Spıke ¬ 16:36 5-Apr-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete - No wonder Doctor Who was cancelled for so long. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 04:37, May. 9, 2013
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Waccy-shoddy. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ยฎ 13:51, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • I haven't read much of it but it seems to be a satirical take on a Sci-Fi movie type war blown out of potential. I can see that the author has chosen Nazis in his subject (as always) however I think with some changes it could be improved. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 11:58, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

Bronies

Score: 6
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (6)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A typographically ugly, illiterate, rambling, unfunny, triple-spaced mess. No comedy theme (except occasional inscrutable references to Borg assimilation); moreover, no comedy. New user Finflam has dumped in more Randumbo, from Osama/Obama to pedophilia. Spıke ¬ 03:09 7-May-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. It really hurts my brain. It's messy, and ham fists terribad references in there.--TheDarthMoogle (talk) 08:10, May 7, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:28, May 7, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Personally I dislike bronies but this is just awful and inaccurate. The article should be deleted, but we seriously need a better article about bronies instead. --RockoRocks TALK vandalizements contribs 20:09, May 7, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Derpy face Derp - This was actually recently rewritten at the Fork. I would link it and offer to share in the magical spirit of friendship and harmony, but I fear alicorn Princess Spike would disapprove. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 04:35, May. 9, 2013
    Any user, even Anon, is welcome to import content during or after a vote to delete an article (though some of the links will be red here) and to claim the Save. I will of course revert attempts to make this page title deliver the reader to a different website. Spıke ¬ 11:31 9-May-13
  6. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ยฎ 13:48, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • This topic could well appear here every month for the next forever, and then be subject to vandalism even if a knight in shining armour turns up to write something decent on it.--TheDarthMoogle (talk) 08:10, May 7, 2013 (UTC)
    If someone writes a quality treatment of Bronies, we can police/protect it. If you feel like undertaking a VFD Save, don't wait for this vote to finish! Spıke ¬ 12:54 7-May-13
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. This is the second time I see this thing on VFD. Ugh. --RockoRocks TALK vandalizements contribs 20:17, May 7, 2013 (UTC)

๐Ÿ”’ :Template:Philosophical Badasses H Tag Oldvfd

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Totally overtaken by Template:Philosophy. How does an article like Plato acquire three overlapping nav-templates? Spıke ¬ 11:21 27-Apr-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Agreed. I prefer Template:Philosophy to this. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 11:32, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Dis template, she in trouble. Aleister 14:48 27-4-'13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ยฎ 13:48, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Moomin Church of His Spaghettiness

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. This article has existed since 2005 but has only been added to by Anons and by one user without a talk page. Everything it has approaching humor is a coded reference to a named person who is not famous. Spıke ¬ 00:38 26-Apr-13
  2. Too much emphasis on a non-notable person, supposedly the leader of said "religion". The idea of a splinter-break off group from Pastafarianism is good, but the execution leaves much to be desired. -- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 00:49, April 26, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete - Random FSM crap. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 04:36, May. 9, 2013
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ye Olde Joke. Send to pasture. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ยฎ 13:53, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Space otter

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny, overly random, boring, short and doesn't look like an article at all. --RockoRocks (talk) 21:18, May 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I tried to give the author guidance at User talk:VivianFaberfox. (If you review the history, you can hear the Bronx cheer she gave us on her way out the door.) No, it is not a good read. Unless you are she. Spıke ¬ 23:22 5-May-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete.-- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 03:03, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Can't see any potential in this. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 05:35, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

๐Ÿ”’ Punch and Judy H Tag Oldvfd

Score: 1
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (1)

Symbol delete vote Delete. No comment needed. Just plain bad. Unfunnny, no images, poorly formatted, random and boring. --RockoRocks TALK vandalizements contribs 14:31, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. Yes, i know this is a new page, but there is no under construction tag and still.. --RockoRocks TALK vandalizements contribs 14:31, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
  • Invalid nomination. This article is 0 days old and to have three tags slapped on it including a nomination for deletion is a rude welcome for a new Uncyclopedian who had received no other welcome. I appreciate the continuing effort to clean up the site, but please avoid a ban and read the entire deletion policy before continuing. Spıke ¬ 15:06 6-May-13

๐Ÿ”’ Matt Smith H T D Oldvfd

Score: 1
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (1)

Symbol delete vote Delete. An article simmiliar to Space otter and Punch and Judy. Mentioning the same stuff over and over gets boring you know. This article is unfunny, boring, badly formatted etc etc. Just go check it out for yourself. --RockoRocks TALK vandalizements contribs 14:37, May 6, 2013 (UTC)--RockoRocks TALK vandalizements contribs 14:31, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
  • Yes, Rocko, "go check it out for yourself" is what voters are supposed to do to any article here before they vote. This one is not brand new but Admin Simsilikesims has just put a Construction tag on it, which means you ought not nominate it for deletion--unless you want to take her tag off and put a {{VFD}} tag on, which you didn't. Good luck with that. Further, I see clever phrasing in this suggesting that it could be a fun article with sufficient work. Spıke ¬ 15:12 6-May-13

๐Ÿ”’ Yashasvini Rajeshwar H Tag Oldvfd

Score: 1
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (1)

Symbol delete vote Delete. Unfunny copy-paste spam article with no images. Appearantly, the same article has been made on Wikipedia and deleted for the following reason : "(G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)" --RockoRocks (talk) 21:35, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
  • Thanks, Rocko, for policing the site. This article and its photo are deleted administratively pursuant to our vanity policies. Spıke ¬ 23:22 5-May-13

Counter-Strike: Text-based version

Score: 3
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep.<<Stammer>> <<ENABLE>> W-well, I th-think that its allright, an-an-and its also a bi-bit funny (Sorry, but I have to Chronically F*ck around, or I DIE) --The Indian Otaku 05:40, April 10, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Someone is mistaking jibba-jabba for creative comedy writing. Spıke ¬ 12:57 6-Apr-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 19:33, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete.Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 11:47, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- HIPSTER T)alk C)untributions B)an 14:56, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Christianism

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A very bad combination of advocacy and randumbo. --Mn-z 16:07, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Indeed. To the good, the Intro sums up exactly the comedy technique: "The afflicted lose all ability to think rationally, use common sense, and in extreme cases, half their IQ." Unfortunately, "X is for stupid people" is insult not comedy. The rest of the article is listcruft. Substantially unchanged since 2005 except for the addition of Section 1, a minimally funny criticism of the basis of Christianity. Spıke ¬ 16:31 5-Apr-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lists. Jesus is a zombie. Not funny. However the concept of Christianity (or religion for that matter) being a disease is a great idea and would have potential. I would encourage others to salvage a good subject matter and make it funny. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 11:50, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Heavy on lists, very little humor. -- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 00:39, April 26, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

๐Ÿ”’ Finnish Profanity H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: 0
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Articles written in English regarding other languages and cultures help English readers of a multi-cultural background, or readers curious about the humour of another given culture experience some of it. I can recognize many of these words, and those I can are in fact correct. If someone has doubts about the validity of what they read on Uncyclopedia (which they should) a quick google is only a step away. A good article should blur the line between truth and falsehood, shouldn't it? This is after all, a mock-encyclopedia. Therefore, if a reader is amused, is it really a bad thing if they DO in fact learn something? Hannes1813 (talk) 22:32, April 10, 2013 (UTC)
    In other words: You are Finnish, and you get it. Your vote confirms to me that the goal of this article is not humor. Unfortunately, this is a humor wiki. Spıke ¬ 11:53 11-Apr-13
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. We probably don't need an article on Finnish, and we certainly don't need one on its swears, as the typical reader of English doesn't know whether anything is true or deliberately false. The overwhelming attempt here is to teach (and to amuse the author by swearing to strangers), not to amuse the reader. Spıke ¬ 21:18 10-Apr-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Confused as to whether these words don't actually mean what the article says they do or that they actually do mean what the article says they do. Would be slightly funny if they didn't mean those definitions but not obvious to reader. A better way of doing this article would be to call it Finnish greetings and then write a swearword in Finnish and give it a pleasant definition. Another way to do this article would be to call it English greetings then write English swearwords which everyone will understand (even the Americans!) and give a definition in English of a pleasant word as though you were teaching a foreigner who doesn't know much English. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 12:55, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
    This exact "comedy" technique--pranking the reader by teaching him to swear when he doesn't intend to--is pursued with listcruft in many of our language articles. Your proposed English "lesson," at least readers of English would recognize as humor. Spıke ¬ 13:02 11-Apr-13
Comments

๐Ÿ”’ That time I accidentally beheaded a queen during my sojourn in France H T D Oldvfd

Score: 0
Keep (2)
  1. A pretty good sojourn {page by Hyperbole. I enlarged the pic and fixed the red links. Sojourns are a set formula, they contain those type of capitalizations and follow a pattern which is discernible after reading a few of them. They've, as a category, been featured (the only category to be featured). I think mnbvcxz created the category. I've written two of them, and you have to follow the formula pretty closely. Hyperbole is one of our best writers, and this page actually educates and puts a "face" on a historical event. Aleister 12:04 11-4-'13
    Dittos on Hyperbole's skill; but after the first couple, pages that "follow the formula" are not creative comedy writing but simply imitation. Spıke ¬ 12:25 11-Apr-13
  2. Keep Strong genius. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:33, April 14, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete.. Lack of content. Incomprehensible. Apparently it has an in-joke in it but this is no excuse for poor spelling, swearing, no other humour, no capital letters at the start of each sentence. There is only one sentence in each paragraph and it is unencyclopedic. If there is something I'm missing and it should be kept then it at least needs to be changed to make it better along with the title which is random and unlikely to be typed in. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 11:31, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The Category identifies it as an Uncyclopedia in-joke but I don't see the joke (except deliberate goofiness so minimally creative that anyone could type it in his sleep). Awfulness is funny, but awful Uncyclopedia pages are less funny than they are simply awful. "Poor spellin", meanwhile, nominator should simply correct rather than use VFD to look for volunteers to do so; least of all the original author, who has surely left the building. Recall also that nominator has the duty to look in the History to see if there was a better version once. Spıke ¬ 11:48 11-Apr-13
    Nominator is unable to find better history version. Nominator thinks that the title is so bad that no one could make this funny. Nominator therefore opts for it to be deleted as there is no content/subject here for nominator to work on. Nominator 11:53 11th April 2013 (UTC)
    QED. Thank you. Spıke ¬ 11:59 11-Apr-13
Comments
  • The in-joke is that this is one of many "my sojourn" articles, and the joke is set up exactly like a my sojourn article. Other than that, this article is "meh". -- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 12:01, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

George W. Bush's Hurricane Machine

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Not encylopedic. Written in first person. Probably used to be a good article but I'm not sure how far to undo the changes. What started off (by the looks of the history) as a joke about GW creating a hurricane with fighter jets has been spoilt by an unregistered user who complains that Republicans are racist, has put a picture of himself on the article, commemorates famous black people and reminds you that he voted Obama a lot. I have no problem with his views but this is a humour site and he appears to be making a non-humorous political statement rant. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 18:01, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Is not just written in the first person but repeatedly returns to the personal quest of the author. The only joke here is that we give A's for such papers if the pupil is black. Nominator's sudden dislike of articles that are intended as rants and only incidentally funny is welcome. Spıke ¬ 22:46 11-Apr-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. If this were a woman of the street, she'd be making no money, would starve, and be mistaken for a crack addict. Aleister 00:44 12-3-'13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Certainly not the best article. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather CUN VFH 20:29, April 15, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Reverted to the article to the version that was nommed on VFH. Still has racism in it; apparently that is part of the joke - the commentary that racism "is ok if done by a minority group", and the idea that minorities think that whites are all racist. The student has obvious bias against white Republicans. Unfortunately, the joke has been lost over time, given Republican hatred of Obama, who happens to be black, and the resulting generalizations that have happened. -- Simsilikesims(โ™€UN) Talk here. 23:44, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
    I can now see the alternate point-of-view this article uses. At least, I can when I get to the last line, the red one "after the credits roll." But sorry, my vote stands. The reader of a humor wiki should not have to slog through a spoof, which is indistinguishable from what millions of black pupils are encouraged to believe in all seriousness, to find a postscript that explains that it is all a joke. Spıke ¬ 00:19 12-Apr-13

The Great Ninjapiratezombierobot War

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. this article takes the form of wars written as a Warcraft in-game conversation. This one is particularly bad, as it references a cliche imaginary war, and is more a communal sandbox than an article. --Mn-z 15:53, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote "You a**hole!" This article neither amuses nor communicates anything. Spıke ¬ 16:40 5-Apr-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Absolute random rubbish. Nothing in it. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 11:59, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. What on Earth is this? Reverend P. Pennyfeather (talk) 19:08, April 15, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

๐Ÿ”’ World War II:This Time it's Personal H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: 0
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Its fine. It parodies and mocks action-war type movies. It needs a bit of editing but that's about it. I found it funny. I'm not sure what SPIKE means by duplicate war but I think that the humour isn't as complicated as that, it just makes you laugh a bit about how Spielberg likes making war films on WW2. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 12:29, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Brother ScottPat, he changed my unchangable mind. And I have used it once in awhile as a link, and will be forced to fix red links all the live long day if this were removed. Aleister 12:41 11-4-'13
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. apparently, we have 3 versions of this article for some reason. --Mn-z 17:41, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Okay, so the joke is, since World War II was a "duplicate war" (of World War I) (only it wasn't except in the eyes of a grade-schooler who has two more years before taking a course on World History) (or was it a duplicate Stephen Spielberg movie?) create an Uncyclopedia article "in the style of the thing it's about" by creating an arbitrary number of copies. One copy for everything the reader might search for, and then some; a brilliant alternative to the Redirect. Spıke ¬ 18:19 25-Mar-13

#War leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Someone else's intestines! Let God Sort Them Out 23:30 25-3-'13

Comments

The Second World War

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. more warcruft. This one is about WWII as a movie, and reads like it was written by a 10 year old. --Mn-z 17:35, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm sure we've already voted to delete one of these clones. NRV. (And the same delete vote on the above.)                               Puppy's talk page01:27 26 Mar 2013
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete.Exact copy of one above. Delete. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 12:35, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Mad rambling with little in the way of humour. Reverend P. Pennyfeather (talk) 19:04, April 15, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

World War VI

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. another wacky war article. This is prone to using capslock for no apparent reason. --Mn-z 17:26, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Notable as amateur fiction but certainly not as humor. The World Wars template reflects the fact that, at some point in our past, writing a new article about World War whatever was a cinch for permanence by meme (imitation). Spıke ¬ 18:11 25-Mar-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. The only good bit is the Iwo Jima McDonalds flag raising picture which would be actually very funny in article on globalisation and companies gaining more power. Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 12:37, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
    The photo lives on: You now reference it on your user page; but moreover, there was an exact duplicate. Spıke ¬ 19:54 15-Apr-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. I didn't think much of it. Reverend P. Pennyfeather (talk) 19:01, April 15, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • The others you list (as of now) are blah wars, not even worth fighting. This article seems like it had some thought into it, has lots of words and detail, its own maps apparently which follow the fighting, and might have redeeming value. I haven't read much of it, so maybe it's all jibberish under a candy covering, so for now I'll restrict this to a comment. The other ones, if you want to count my vote as a delete, please do so. Aleister 17:56 25-3-'13
    For the record, when counting, I am not going to hallucinate Aleister Delete votes onto a ballot based on discussion that occurs on some other ballot. Spıke ¬ 18:11 25-Mar-13

Personal tools
projects