Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive271

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Archive)
(Archive)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Archive|../}}
 
{{Archive|../}}
 
----
 
----
  +
== {{VFDc|Unquotable:Satan}} ==
  +
{{Votervfd|time=15:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=4
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{keep}} Not a Muppet. Beyond that this is an example of what the namespace is good for. There's half a dozen decent one liners, but not enough content to call it an article of prose. Adding much more to this would potentially be overkill. Deleting this would be removing a page that has merit. Saying “It wouldn't survive in mainspace” is correct - and that's why we have other name spaces. This is better than 99% of [[:Category:My sojourn|My sojourn]] articles. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:43 20 Feb 2013}}
  +
#{{keep}} Per above. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 06:50, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
  +
#{{keep}}- the Unquotable section of articles work together collectively allowing for running gags, viewing each as a stand alone article is, in my view, the wrong approach to dealing with this section of articles. -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
  +
#{{Keep}}. TYUN! -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=#{{delete}} this feels like the retarded step-brother of the [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/good-guy-lucifer/ Good Guy Lucifer meme]. This is a mixture of scattershot, advocacy, and general quotecruft. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} If anyone wants to write an article in the voice of Satan, I consider that a legitimate comedy strategy. This article is that strategy reduced to exactly listcruft. If any newbie wrote this in mainspace, any experienced editor would tell him that we are looking for funny paragraphs and not quips, slaps, and one-liners. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:25 19-Feb-13</small>
  +
|comments=*{{comment|At pup}} the problem with this is that there may be 6 good one-liners, but there are 20 quotes on the page. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:16, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  +
----
  +
*'''Vote closed.''' No consensus to delete. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:03 26-Feb-13</small>
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDc|Making up Oscar Wilde quotes}} ==
  +
{{Votervfd|time=15:47, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=3.5
  +
|keep=
  +
# '''Half keep per Kip'''. It has significance. The issue is that this page, much like [[Vandalism/example on wheels!]], has a place on this site. But I'd replace most of the content with [[Unquotable:Oscar Wilde]] and make '''that''' the redirect. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:56 20 Feb 2013}}
  +
#Entire vote per Kip. This is a historic page in uncy's history. As the source of the Oscar Wilde quotes, and the start of the in-joke, essential page. I like the plaque idea, to mark it as historic. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 12:51 21-2-'13
  +
#{{Keep}} As the origin of the in-joke, this page should be kept. I too like the idea of a plaque. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:26, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
  +
#{{Keep}}. I also like the idea of plaque build-up. I'd work on said plaque, but would probably have my work replaced four hours later. -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=#{{delete}} redundant with [[Unquotable:Oscar Wilde]]. I finally got around to reading through this article and moving the good quotes (all 3 of them) to the other Wilde quote page, and I recently purged it too. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:47, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  +
|comments=
  +
*I feel the need to point out that this page has historical significance as the very origin of the Oscar Wilde in-joke. If anything, it deserves a clean-up and a plaque. {{User:Kip the Dip/sig}} <small>09:56, Feb. 20, 2013</small>
  +
*{{comment|@ pup & kip}} there is alot of overlap between this page and [[Unquotable:Oscar Wilde]]. Besides bad quotes, there is nothing of importance here that isn't at the unquotable page. I would actually prefer to move the unquotable to this name, per my crusade to delete the unquotable namespace. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:20, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  +
:* I would be {{for| }} merging Unquotable:Oscar Wilde with this namespace, but {{against| }} deleting Unquotable entirely. It's a valid parody of Wikiquotes and amusing when properly managed. Then again, what you do with your own Uncyclopedia is your business. {{User:Kip the Dip/sig}} <small>02:52, Feb. 21, 2013</small>
  +
----
  +
*'''Vote closed.''' Broad support to keep. Ideas on restructuring our Wildeisms are still welcome in the [[Forum:Trimming back the Wilde Quotes|Forum]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:58 26-Feb-13</small>
  +
}}
  +
 
== {{VFDc|Word Salad}} ==
 
== {{VFDc|Word Salad}} ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:12, February 28, 2013


🔒 Unquotable:Satan H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2
Keep (4)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Not a Muppet. Beyond that this is an example of what the namespace is good for. There's half a dozen decent one liners, but not enough content to call it an article of prose. Adding much more to this would potentially be overkill. Deleting this would be removing a page that has merit. Saying “It wouldn't survive in mainspace” is correct - and that's why we have other name spaces. This is better than 99% of My sojourn articles.                               Puppy's talk page12:43 20 Feb 2013
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Per above. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:50, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep.- the Unquotable section of articles work together collectively allowing for running gags, viewing each as a stand alone article is, in my view, the wrong approach to dealing with this section of articles. -- Sir Mhaille  Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  4. Symbol keep vote Keep.. TYUN! -- Imrealized ...hmm? 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. this feels like the retarded step-brother of the Good Guy Lucifer meme. This is a mixture of scattershot, advocacy, and general quotecruft. --Mn-z 15:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If anyone wants to write an article in the voice of Satan, I consider that a legitimate comedy strategy. This article is that strategy reduced to exactly listcruft. If any newbie wrote this in mainspace, any experienced editor would tell him that we are looking for funny paragraphs and not quips, slaps, and one-liners. Spıke ¬ 18:25 19-Feb-13
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote At pup the problem with this is that there may be 6 good one-liners, but there are 20 quotes on the page. --Mn-z 14:16, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

  • Vote closed. No consensus to delete. Spıke ¬ 23:03 26-Feb-13

🔒 Making up Oscar Wilde quotes H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2.5
Keep (3.5)
  1. Half keep per Kip. It has significance. The issue is that this page, much like Vandalism/example on wheels!, has a place on this site. But I'd replace most of the content with Unquotable:Oscar Wilde and make that the redirect.                               Puppy's talk page10:56 20 Feb 2013
  2. Entire vote per Kip. This is a historic page in uncy's history. As the source of the Oscar Wilde quotes, and the start of the in-joke, essential page. I like the plaque idea, to mark it as historic. Aleister 12:51 21-2-'13
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep. As the origin of the in-joke, this page should be kept. I too like the idea of a plaque. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:26, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol keep vote Keep.. I also like the idea of plaque build-up. I'd work on said plaque, but would probably have my work replaced four hours later. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. redundant with Unquotable:Oscar Wilde. I finally got around to reading through this article and moving the good quotes (all 3 of them) to the other Wilde quote page, and I recently purged it too. --Mn-z 15:47, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • I feel the need to point out that this page has historical significance as the very origin of the Oscar Wilde in-joke. If anything, it deserves a clean-up and a plaque. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 09:56, Feb. 20, 2013
  • Symbol comment vote @ pup & kip there is alot of overlap between this page and Unquotable:Oscar Wilde. Besides bad quotes, there is nothing of importance here that isn't at the unquotable page. I would actually prefer to move the unquotable to this name, per my crusade to delete the unquotable namespace. --Mn-z 14:20, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • I would be Symbol for vote merging Unquotable:Oscar Wilde with this namespace, but Symbol against vote deleting Unquotable entirely. It's a valid parody of Wikiquotes and amusing when properly managed. Then again, what you do with your own Uncyclopedia is your business. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 02:52, Feb. 21, 2013

  • Vote closed. Broad support to keep. Ideas on restructuring our Wildeisms are still welcome in the Forum. Spıke ¬ 22:58 26-Feb-13

🔒 Word Salad H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: 1
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. In the style of what it's about, this article is intentionally random, and meant to be that way. It is slightly longer than it needs to be, but some randomness is amusing, and this deliberately goes over the top in its randomness. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 01:02, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. random for the sake of random. This has been kept twice, but it has been 3 years since it has been taken to VFD. It has only 1 mainspace link, so I am guessing no-one really cares about it. --Mn-z 08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I can't add to my argument in its last VFD; but in the one before that, before I arrived, it had overwhelming support: Don't delete until Romartus has had a say. Spıke ¬ 14:45 17-Feb-13
Comments
  • Vote closed. You can cut the apathy with a knife! even Romartus got as close as the ballot just above but elected not to jump in here. Spıke ¬ 19:28 26-Feb-13

Bert

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
Bert-Hitler

Your Admins reviewing the parade of bad articles.

  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Muppet cruft.                               Puppy's talk page12:37 20 Feb 2013
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. cliche children's character is evil with all the standard cliches, such as homosexuality, name dropping, and impossible dates. --Mn-z 18:30, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article takes the concepts "Bert is evil" and "Bert is gay", and elaborates on them ad nauseum, without adding anything of humor value. Even mentions Hurricane Katrina, which dates the article. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:03, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Further to my Comment below, I am confident that all three of you watch PBS and take it that youse did not find one page of quality writing in this article. Spıke ¬ 20:01 25-Feb-13
Comments
  • In this contrived ten-page hatchet-job about the puppet, there might be one page of material that actually relates to Bert. Watchers of PBS will have to be the judge. Spıke ¬ 20:00 20-Feb-13

Template:Leekuanyew1

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Random generated template used on three articles. Unfunny and ugly.                               Puppy's talk page04:36 24 Feb 2013
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. what puppy said. --Mn-z 12:06, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Also a political comment on Singaporean repression, styled as "funny." Its goal is to simulate a stamp of official disapproval on three didactic and ranty articles: Lee Kuan Yew, Lee Hsien Loong, and Politics of Singapore, which will find their way here in due time. Spıke ¬ 12:12 24-Feb-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:51, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Reminder: No huffing in the first 24 hours; I have asked creator CDPCCNAC to come and defend his work. Spıke ¬ 12:32 24-Feb-13

Unquotable:Socrates

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article consists of an intro that could have been stolen from illogicopedia and 4 really bad quotes. --Mn-z 18:49, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Starts with "So - crates" (a Steve Martin gag, I believe) and ends with "the sound of his feces," with virtually nothing in between. Some user did not write it, and Mnbvcxz did not strip it naked to ride through VFD more easily. Spıke ¬ 19:08 24-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. So-crates Johnson was his name in Bill and Ted's excellent adventure. While I prefer that pronunciation, there's nothing else in this article salvageable. Those 4 quotes are more like 12 that are just badly formatted.                               Puppy's talk page10:54 24 Feb 2013
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Eureka!...(sorry, that was Archimedes) -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:52, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

IWP:HOTCAT

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. This was created purely to cover a redlink caused due to coding issues. As wp is now a prefix for wikipedia, WP:HOTCAT is no longer a valid page name. The coding that caused the redlinks has since been fixed, so the only page linking to this is a fnoodle list. This is QVFD material, but is admin protected and has been around too long to warrant QVFD. Even by our low standards for in-jokes, this is pretty bad.                               Puppy's talk page04:14 24 Feb 2013
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. what he said, and it is, or rather was, a crack-wise navigation tool. --Mn-z 12:05, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. A clerical change. Spıke ¬ 12:14 24-Feb-13
Comments

🔒 Glenn_Beck_(Asshat) H T D Oldvfd

Score: 0
Keep (2)
  1. A vital page to keep Glenn Beck's honored name among the people who care most. Aleister 14:20 15-2-'13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Because the talk page of this article is hilarious. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:22, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
    This page should stay because some other page is funny? Make some sense! Spıke ¬ 12:18 24-Feb-13
    Not just any other page: Normally when an article is deleted, its talk page is deleted too. The talk page should stay, therefore keep the article. This has precedent in say, Euroipods. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 02:24, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. and redirect to Glenn Beck. This is a combination of "I don't like this guy's politics" and a database of Youtube videos. We already have a much better article on the subject. --Mn-z 14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Delete. It's a redundancy, and not a good one. SPIKE has improved it, but I don't see a point on having a "passable" article on a topic where we have a "featured" article.                               Puppy's talk page11:43 16 Feb
Comments
  • As "Uncyclopedia is not a catalog to things found elsewhere on the Net," I've deleted three sections that had no function but to send readers to YouTube. Pieces of this article intended to serve up true utterances of Beck by which to discredit him are advocacy, not humor, even if you think he is ridiculously funny. Some funny stuff remains and I would like to see it merged into Glenn Beck, as "Asshat" in the title is likewise too busy being advocacy to help the reader reach the article. I assume Aleister's vote is more advocacy rather than a vote. Spıke ¬ 14:31 15-Feb-13
    Advocacy? Are we wikipedia now? All the Fred Phelps pages are advocacy, the Hitler pages are too, I guess, and anti-Hitler pages are too, and on and on...Aleister minutes later. I remember when we moved this page to here when Glenn Beck was replaced with the other page, and there was discussion about what to call it, and Asshat won.
    I reply by boldfacing a sentence of my earlier reply. Multiple wrongs don't make a right. The Hitler pages have value added by Uncyclopedians. If you intend to reassemble the YouTube collection that I deleted, please take it to a more suitable website. Spıke ¬ 14:41 15-Feb-13
    I strike part of my earlier reply. Glenn Beck was a FA and should not receive any orphaned pieces of this article, especially if that is not an improvement. Spıke ¬ 16:06 15-Feb-13
    I recall when Glenn Beck was written there was some discussion about if it should replace this article, which was an established page by that time. We decided sure, as long as this page was kept around, and the discussion of what to name it was heated and laster for about a year (no it didn't, but it was discussed). I don't like the Glenn Beck page itself, it's more of an UnBooks because it's a transcript of Beck's show. This page is more encyclopedic, and I think should have remained the Beck article. And why can't we put the videos back on the talk page????? This seems a suitable place to put them, and to enjoy them at our leisure. Videos work, and many pages use them. Do we have a limit on vids (three sounds reasonable if presented well, with captions and they are appropriate to the page. The vid at UnPoetia:Well-oil birds worked so perfectly you'd think it was designed for the page) and if so, let's put a couple of them back at least. Glenn, we hardly knew ye! Aleister 12:45 16-2-'13
    Do we have a limit? My personal limit is 1; as when yesterday I cut out a section of Bear wrestler with no original comedy, designed only to share a TV show with other Uncyclopedians. Which is as close as you come to comedy in the deleted sections. We appreciate the work of cops but not enough to allow roughing up detainees; and we benefit from your skill but not when you use the website to catalog the rants of a commentator you disagree with. Spıke ¬ 14:27 17-Feb-13
    I just visited Bear wrestler. Imagine my disappointment when I discovered it wasn't about hairy homosexual gladiators.                               Puppy's talk page02:34 17 Feb
  • On a related note, I found Unquotable:Glenn Beck which is similarly themed, although it is written like a bad uncyclopedia rather than a bad liberaladvocacypedia article. --Mn-z 10:50, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

  • Vote closed. Still split down the middle for over a week. Spıke ¬ 18:13 25-Feb-13

🔒 Rovdism H Tag Oldvfd

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Cyberbullying? The Intro of this article claims to be about "Norwegian...NTNU student Kristian...Rovde" (whom it faults for lack of intellectual rigor) and much of the humor is in Norwegian. It has been around for a very long time, but doesn't seem of general interest even if there is some notable person named Rovde. (There is a town by that name.) Spıke ¬ 12:28 22-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. per Pope John Paul II. Its either cyberbullying or randumbo. In both cases, it should be deleted. --Mn-z 13:46, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote UserspaceThis article is either vanity or cyberbullying. Although it has a concept behind it (the way someone rationalizes things), that concept is ruined by the focus on a non-notable individual. If Pup wants to work on it, to remove this unfortunate focus, let him. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:54, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Wheeling Jesuit University/People and everything beneath it

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I await a patient explanation of why this entire section is not vanity/cyberbullying, why College Administrators are public figures, and why Codeine's Mum cares what you think about your Deans. Spıke ¬ 23:51 19-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Looks like a list to me, and nothing more than a list, with nothing explaining why these people are funny, or even "good" or even "evil" for funny reasons. Besides, as Spike says above, they are not notable, and this section reeks of vanity. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:21, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
    But note the heading: There is an entire directory beneath, whose articles focus on each individual. Spıke ¬ 00:58 20-Feb-13
    The part about everything beneath it is new...but I agree. The three sub-articles about people that I bothered to read all lacked both humor and notability. Just not funny to an outsider, and doomed to be obsolete in a few years, if not already. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:41, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. We have no need to libel people who we don't know. --Mn-z 13:50, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  4. All his time I thought Wheeling J. Univ. was a made up in-joke, an entire University set up on our pages with dozens if not hundreds of pages. But it's a real place! I don't think any of the people are real, although maybe I'm wrong. One user did most of this, he must have been like a caffeine-addicted muskrat to write all this stuff. Probably in an institution now. Some good pics on the pages I've been thru, maybe save some of those to other articles. Aleister 12:46 21-2-'13
Comments
  • I've never quite understood the WJU thing myself. I guess it's an in-joke, but even then it's not a very good one.                               Puppy's talk page11:15 20 Feb 2013
  • I ask Aleister on his talk page to collect the pics he wants to save into a gallery so they are not deleted as orphans. Spıke ¬ 13:05 21-Feb-13
    Too much work, but save them all if they're good. Spike says he deletes orphaned pics, yet doesn't have his picture viewing turned on. This is like a blind man deleting sights he doesn't like. Save the pics and prune the pages. Aleister
    Sorry, even more work to go through a massive vanity project and decide what photos you might find use for in the future and yet be unable to re-upload suitable ones. And not indeed worth enabling images or traveling to a Hot Spot. If the purpose of this page were to save media for your possible use, we would not allow Delete votes. You might get Simsilikesims to execute this huge deletion in her spare time; if it comes to me to do it, I will check nothing other than whether a photo has been orphaned. Spıke ¬ 10:58 23-Feb-13
    Deleted per VFD consensus. Photos kept for Aleister's use (good luck finding them without a gallery page). -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:38, February 23, 2013 (UTC)

Unquotable:Quote Market

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. this is basically a list of bad quotes taken from articles. The last new quote was added in May, 2007. --Mn-z 19:39, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote "I pity the black fool who dont have no rapper name." A great proportion of these neither relate to the article from which they were taken from nor to the public figure (where the utteror even is a public figure) who supposedly was quoted. Almost none of them deal in double entendre or unintended meaning. That is, all of these satisfy my criteria for quoticide. Many of them advertise that they are taken from articles that are now red-links. The fact that all of them are quotable out of context suggests that none of them did much to further the comedy strategy of the article they were in. They are set out in a format as though there were a bidding war going on for them, which is not a satire of anything. Thus, the article is a tribute to the affectation of peppering other articles with bad quotations: A tribute to a writing practice that consensus was reached months ago was inadvisable. Or, perhaps, one author's Kamek-like tribute to edits he himself has made. Spıke ¬ 19:52 20-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Although this has potential to be funny, the potential is never reached, and not all the bad quotes are given a price! Worse yet, this article encourages the bad practice of adding bad quotes to articles, and could grow too quickly for it to keep up with itself (with a price for each bad quote) were every bad quote from the entire of Uncyclopedia to be added to it as they are found. It has a funny idea behind it, but the humor is just not found here. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:35, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Mordillo. Aleister 8:58 23-2-'13
Comments

🔒 :File:WildeTablets.png H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. See below. Spıke ¬ 13:18 21-Feb-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. because we are more mature than the fork. Although, some against votes on the VFP might be in order. --Mn-z 13:38, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Spike above. Aleister 8:13 23-2-'13
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Designed to be an advertisement for another site. While it may be suitable there (but needs a bit of cleaning up) it's not suitable here. Also contained an unsubtle advertisement on it's VFP page.                               Puppy's talk page11:57 21 Feb 2013
    That may be what it was designed to be but what it is is simply an expression of sentiment against our web host, and we don't usually delete pages solely to control opinion. Unsubtlety on a page that uses this photo is another thing, but those advertisers have gotten significantly subtler over time, and Aleister and two Admins are currently winking directions to various users. We have better things to do than try to excise all the nose-thumbing done during the recent insurrection. Also, this image is potentially useful for further Shooping. Spıke ¬ 13:02 21-Feb-13
Comments

Unquotable:Hitler

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I was going to prune this, but I don't think there is anything savable. In real life, Hitler didn't say anything witty or clever. Most people who quote Hitler are quote-mining for ammunition against their political opponents. Other Hitler quoters are looking for flashes of mad genius where there was no genius. So basically, there is little source material for this article, which is why most of the quotes are random, or "kill the Jews." There are ways of doing Hitler articles, but this isn't it. --Mn-z 15:04, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote "Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa." This hideous, over-long, and badly formatted page is far worse than some in the namespace. The average entry is Anon reveling in writing a one-line rant, often in ALL CAPITALS, and attributing it to the infamous Hitler not because it relates to him but just for melodrama. Spıke ¬ 15:12 21-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Achtung! Dis in not einen funny!                               Puppy's talk page07:06 22 Feb 2013
  4. Per Aimsplode. Aleister 8:12 23-2-'13
Comments

🔒 Voltaire H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote "Does this article make me look fat?" Nominator is fighting the good fight and I don't want to discourage it. But this one isn't right. Voltaire has a single theme--Voltaire as a pimp--and it does a fair job of giving a pimp's-eye view of Voltaire's contemporaries (incidentally obviating Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta). It doesn't change theme; rather, it has been beset by vandalism and listcruft. Unquotable:Voltaire takes a different and equally valid tack, hewing closer to the facts, but is overwhelmingly an article about things Voltaire said--probably one of the few arguments for a separate namespace. 15:13 No, I take that back, "Voltaire: Quotations" could work equally well in mainspace. Spıke ¬ 15:14 19-Feb-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Per SPIKE. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 15:02 Feb 20 2013
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:03, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. and replace with Unquotable:Voltaire. This article changes theme at least 3 times in 5.5 kb of text, and half old-time listcruft, with the mandatory Oscar Wilde shout-out. --Mn-z 14:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. I don't think "random historical figure as a Gansta" is a good formula. If someone wants to save this, I would withdraw my nomination, however, there isn't enough material here to justify an article. --Mn-z 15:36, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Morphing a philosopher into a gangster is a valid formula. I tend to vote to delete articles on the basis that they don't have a formula at all. But I agree that the theme never reached article-length. Spıke ¬ 15:50 19-Feb-13

World War III-XX

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. a wacky war from the 31st century between Coke and Pepsi involving Harrison Ford, Tome Cruise, and Chuck Norris. --Mn-z 08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per above. There used to be World War articles on every number between III and about XV, and we got rid of all; did this one survive merely from our fatigue? Spıke ¬ 14:47 17-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:07, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. The phrase "The former Yugoslavia, home to all wars" made me giggle a little bit. Other than that, this article has no redeeming value. -- HIPSTER T)alk C)untributions B)an 19:50, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

🔒 Unquotable:Quotes in Piratespeak, Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata, Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta, Unquotable:Quotes in Français H Tag Oldvfd

Score: 2
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I like the idea of these other "languages", and the unquotable pages are classic examples of these other faux languages. Besides, removing these pages should be a decision put off until the fate of the Unquotable namespace is decided, since they are linked to on the main page of the Unquotable namespace, and would require a change to that page. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:36, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
    The second sentence doesn't convince me. Although having fewer articles in Unquotable biases the decision on the fate of the namespace, deleting legitimately VFD-worthy articles also provides useful data with which to make that decision. And the Unquotable main page has, essentially, a template on it. We don't shy away from VFD-ing bad wrestling articles because they appear on the Wrestling template; we do the right thing, then adjust the template. Spıke ¬ 03:58 19-Feb-13
    This is not just one VFD but several nominations merged into one, with the apparent objective of damaging the Unquotable main page by removing all "alternative languages" from the Unquotable main page. The changes required to the template or page would be extensive here, unlike the recently deleted Unquotable On Wheels page or Unquotable Dumbass page, which were already deleted individually and removed individually. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Weak keep. I really like the piratespeak one. The others I'm not so happy with, but the concept of several “odd” languages also works well. But I can't vote on the deletion of several different pages. While a game can be done in one hit (because the subpages are part of the one game), these are all separate. Which is annoying, as Gangsta I've considered nominating before myself.                               Puppy's talk page10:46 20 Feb 2013
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Argh matey. This be unquotes in piratespeak. Shiver me timbers and hoist the mizzen mast. Make this land-lubbing article walk the plank and send it to Davy Jones's locker. Avast, ye scalawags: yo-ho-ho and a bottle of rum. --Mn-z 19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Could have sworn that Groundhog Day has passed, but I keep seeing the same page over and over. Nominator counted 37 pages in this namespace: How many are prank copies of the same text? (Don't spend time researching that question....) Spıke ¬ 19:41 18-Feb-13
  3. Delete like it's 1999. Aleister 00:52 19-2-'13
Comments
  • Clarification. There about about 65 pages, 37 of which are "real articles". This type of stuff is not counted as a "real article". There are two three more repeats of the mainpage. --Mn-z 19:47, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
    Yikes! We have allowed more than one article per VFD nomination, provided you specify exactly what is to be deleted when nominating, and you don't mind having the vote be all-or-nothing. Hint, hint. Spıke ¬ 19:55 18-Feb-13
    Iz admin, go ahead and do it. Other three are Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata, Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta, and the somewhat "different" Unquotable:Quotes in Français --Mn-z 19:59, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
    By consensus of the only voters so far, it is so ordered. Spıke ¬ 20:09 18-Feb-13
    PS--The Français page is a disambig over to our French counterpart, something we should not put ourselves in the business of doing except via the Sidebar; the Obfuscata illustrates something that should be a canon rule: The bonus points for "writing an article in the style of the thing it's about" should have a big red warning sign for the repetitive, the gratuitously confusing, and the otherwise very bad, which this one is. Spıke ¬ 20:14 18-Feb-13
  • Symbol comment vote @ Sims these pages really aren't an essential, or even useful, part of quotespace. They are reskins, or rather, rephrasings of the introductory paragraph on the none-too-well-formatted quotespace mainpage. --Mn-z 19:10, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
    I agree. Bad imitations of a foreign language, or of a way of speaking, are a reasonable comedy strategy; but applying it by transliterating another Uncyclopedia article is too Inside Baseball for me. We are not paid by page count! Spıke ¬ 19:45 19-Feb-13
    The main page of Quotespace would have to be extensively modified to remove all of these since they are under their own header. Take another look at the way the page is formatted - removing these would leave a completely empty section, making the main Quotespace page look strange. Besides, I am opposed to nominating all of these in one nomination. Individually some of these are not necessary (I would not be opposed to removing the Gangsta and the Francais, for instance) but I do like the pirate speak as an example of how to speak piratespeak and I do like the obfuscata as an example of how to speak obfuscata. Besides, those styles of writing should have their own articles (with original content, not copies of existing pages) but don't. What I'm saying is remove some of them, but not all of them at the same time, because it would mess up the layout of the Unquotable Main Page. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:11, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

Vote closed. As the combining of unrelated articles into a single vote has become an issue along with the articles themselves, the vote is closed; nothing is deleted; but the usual one-month bar against (individual) renomination is not invoked. Spıke ¬ 14:17 20-Feb-13

🔒 Unquotable:Charles Darwin H D Oldvfd

Score: 1
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm throwing this out to see if we want to trim back the UnQuotable project. I support its deletion, because scattershot lists of quotes are not funny. --Mn-z 10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Unquotable is a parody of Wikiquote. This means that it's essentially a scattershot of lists of quotes. Some of these are okay, given that it's a very limited frame. Most of them are terrible. And Unquotable:Steven Wright[1] has recently been recreated, and as with previous incarnations is pretty woeful. While I'd agree with a massive trim on these pages (which I went through and trimmed out a lot of these a year ago, but VFD'd few of them), the namespace has it's place.                               Puppy's talk page11:04 17 Feb
    Just because Wikipedia does something doesn't mean we should copy it. An example is the fork's recent "UnVoyage" which is likely to turn into Ultra-Towncruft, if it isn't forgotten in a few months. While the unquotable format does parody an actual thing, it is not particularly conducive to writing good material. There is no good reason why there should be a quote page by Charles Darwin, and not one by, say Preggobear. I could create a quote page for Preggobear, but anything I can say there can be , and probably is, said better in paragraph format in the mainspace article. --Mn-z 11:18, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
    Yeah, but if we tried to do a Captain Oblivious article it... well, you can see what I ended up doing with it. I've trimmed this particular page down now to remove some of the worst quotes. (Although I agree - I see no value in UnVoyage. It'll go much the same way as UnBestiary in the end.)                               Puppy's talk page12:17 17 Feb
    My issue is that you are saving weak articles by moving them out of mainspace into a "crapspace" for lack of a better term. Articles like Captain Oblivious should stand or fall on their own merits, not hide their flaws behind a namespace. It would like moving Robotic ghost pirates to UnLegacyRandumbo:Robotic ghost pirates instead of taking it to VFD. --Mn-z 13:13, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
    Except that I didn't think it was VFD worthy. I felt it had merit, but not in the “frame” of mainspace. Otherwise we should delete UnDictionary because all the articles are stubs. Under that “frame”, this article works.                               Puppy's talk page01:42 17 Feb

  1. Now deleted, independent of the issues discussed here; a cut-and-paste from an external humor website. -Spike

  • Vote closed. Succeeded at opening the debate on the namespace, and at inducing edits to the nominated page, but got no support in four days to delete the page. Spıke ¬ 13:15 21-Feb-13

Garry's Mod

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU DESU An overlong, ugly, ranty article about a modification to a video game? Spıke ¬ 19:54 19-Feb-13
  2. Actually, it happens to be an independent physics sandbox game... but I agree, Symbol delete vote it needs to go. --Snippy 11:07, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol EXTERMINATE vote small Nuke it!                                Puppy's talk page11:20 20 Feb 2013
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 13:57, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Longinus

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. red-link laden randumbo from 2006 that survived this long mainly due to mentioning kitten huffing. Although it has been edited a few times since 2006, it is still the same article. --Mn-z 08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pick a topic. Pick a meme. Shuffle. The result is filler. Spıke ¬ 14:49 17-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per above. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 01:04, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Category:Things Retards Believe

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another category by which to slap a tag on an article that you simply dislike the subject. Used in userspace and, of course, on Fox News. A clever insult is one thing; saying retards believe it is drive-by listcruft. Spıke ¬ 12:16 18-Feb-13
  2. Yep per below                               Puppy's talk page01:23 18 Feb 2013
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Insult category. --Mn-z 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Mexican Canadian War of 1984

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. as discussed on User talk:Aleister in Chains#Mexican Canadian War of 1984. A winner of the WTF and why is it here? award.                               Puppy's talk page01:42 17 Feb
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete promptly. No one will ever look for this article (except Anon, overnight) and no one cares about author's random history-of-the-future (set in 1984 only because 1984 is a meme). Spıke ¬ 14:19 17-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. yet another Wacky War with an old meme thrown in. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:57, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Unquotable:Quotes_on_Wheels

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. another unquotable reskin. This was has formatting to make it look vandalized. Largely untouched since 2006. Apparently, adding "ON WHEEELS" randomly and repeatedly was funny back in 2006. --Mn-z 19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Did the vandal author know that a VFD template was coming when he wrote his SPAN with absolute positioning to overlay it? I had a notion to hack this prank away, but I hope and expect the entire page will meet its maker soon. Spıke ¬ 19:30 18-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This page is ugly, and really doesn't add much of anything, and isn't even close to another "language", doesn't teach n00bs anything either. It can go. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:40, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Delete like it's 1999. Aleister 00:52 19-2-'13
Comments

Unquotable:Litterbox

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Back in 2006, some user created a copy of the sandbox in quotespace. Literally. --Mn-z 19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. An alternate namespace no more needs its own Sandbox than, well, the F.C.C. needs its own judges and welfare system. Happily, this aberration we can get rid of without a union grievance. Spıke ¬ 20:03 18-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. No need for this redundancy. The quotes on this page aren't even that funny. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:01, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Delete like it's 1999. Aleister 00:52 19-2-'13
Comments

Unquotable:Quotes_in_Dumbass

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is a basically a reskin of Unquotable:Main_Page. And by reskin, I mean text change. This is essentially the same article as it was in 2006. --Mn-z 13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. And the "text change" is to vulgar (not even original-vulgar but vulgar in the style of Dumbass). Amusing to the author (creatively named Some user, sigh), not clever for the reader. Spıke ¬ 14:04 18-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Dumb but not amusing. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:42, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Delete like it's 1999. Aleister 00:52 19-2-'13
Comments

🔒 Debate H T D Oldvfd

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete and redirect to UnDebate:Main Page.                               Puppy's talk page01:46 17 Feb
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Yes, do exactly that. Some day a student on the debate team will write an article with serious ridicule of that experience. That will beat the crap out of this long ramble that treats debate as yet another Wacky War. Spıke ¬ 14:40 17-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. I lost interest in this article about halfway through the sample debate, and couldn't be bothered to read all of it, it's that bad. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:51, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

JC-bashers

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Randumbo with a hint of advocacy. It has largely been untouched since 2006, except for a wannabe-maintenance template. I think it might be a parody of Jehovah's Witnesses, since it seems that JC-bashers are Christians. (JC = Jesus Christ, I assume). Or maybe JC-bashers are bible thumpers. Whatever this article is supposed to be about, I assume we probably have (or should have) a better version somewhere. --Mn-z 11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Yes, exactly "randumbo with a hint of advocacy." If you are going to take on strident advocates/opponents of a sect (includes Glenn Beck), be playful and not extreme-sounding yourself--and above all, don't write crap. Spıke ¬ 12:12 16-Feb-13
  3. I like Uncyclopedia:Legal_Department/JCbashers, but I also like An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective. I wouldn't want to reinstate the original article in that case either.                               Puppy's talk page12:28 16 Feb
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Just not funny enough, looks like it was written by an 11 year old, except for the legal department link. That part was funny. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:51, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Winx Club

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Scattershot article that confuses memes, naughty bits, and random fetishes for humor. In addition it is only linked to from a list in Fnoodle's userspace. --Mn-z 08:26, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete.                               Puppy's talk page10:59 17 Feb
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This does not deliver enjoyment to the reader but only to an author who wants to write about kiddie porn. If there really is such a TV show, start over. Spıke ¬ 14:30 17-Feb-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Oh my god, so much weird-ass and creepy fetishes on this page... it's almost just like deviantART!! This page also contains too much profanity and spelling mistakes--RockoRocks (talk) 21:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • One more thing. If this page gets deleted, can we please delete all those creepy fetish images that are currently on the page aswell. Thanks, --RockoRocks (talk) 21:54, February 18, 2013 (UTC) (specifially, File:Brúm_peidorrenta.JPG, File:Istéllo.JPG, File:Potrancas.JPG and File:Sadomazô.JPG
    Rocko, look at what I've done--made them into links and start with : so as to cite the photos without displaying them--Specify in this way to make the job easier. Except for a three-year-old reference to one of them in a Forum, all four will become orphans and will be deleted, as you can see by clicking through to the image description pages. Spıke ¬ 22:15 18-Feb-13

🔒 Terms of Use H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2
Keep (2)
  1. I believe I am the Admin to whom Mnbvcxz refers. The cases where I didn't realize something was a joke are numerous and legend. In the case I was thinking about, I patrolled an edit to this page and reported it in passing to Sannse without viewing the page as a whole. Although it does air grievances with Wikia and risks attracting trolling by resentful users and perhaps from the Fork, it is seriously funny. We ought to have room for a page imitating legalism, but with a litany not to "publish, copy, display, distribute, [or] put mayonnaise on"--especially when it already has a disclaimer at the start that it's not the real thing. Spıke ¬ 19:04 14-Feb-13
    Actually, Wikia is not mentioned in here at all.                               Puppy's talk page07:55 15 Feb
    No, not by name; but some of the material seems to be motivated by real-world gripes. Spıke ¬ 16:07 15-Feb-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Too funny to let die. Besides, if you actually read it, or even scan it, you will realize it isn't the real thing, besides there's a disclaimer at the top pointing to the real thing. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 07:05, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. and soft redirect to Wikia's real terms of use. This fake page has confused even an admin, and isn't that funny. --Mn-z 18:07, February 14, 2013 (UTC) withdrawn per consensus and lack of deletion support. --Mn-z 19:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Suicidal Tendencies

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't know who this band is, but I'm going to wager R.J. Herrera did not loose his penis in a house fire in 1776, and the band wasn't founded in 666 AD. --Mn-z 12:13, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I remember the band from back in the day. But this article is as enticing as a bucket of peelings from a man with leprosy.                               Puppy's talk page12:22 16 Feb
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. What Puppy would call a "fanboy rant" with horrible typography. Also perhaps the website's longest red-link referencing masturbation. Spıke ¬ 12:23 16-Feb-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Concur. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:41, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Robotic ghost pirates

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
Picard-wtf

Picard doesn't like this article.

  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. very short and random article. Although it has been edited several times recently, it seems to consist of the 2006 formula "find a funny title, add funny pics, and fill out the text with randumbo". --Mn-z 11:27, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. All of the quotes are filler. Nonsense year number. Mere naming of Dick Cheney assumed to be a joke. (Who knew it would get to be 2013?) Documented like, yawn, a Pokémon card. And everything nominator sets out. Spıke ¬ 11:39 16-Feb-13
  3. I agree with Picard completely.                               Puppy's talk page11:49 16 Feb
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:36, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

🔒 Glasses H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The intro has glimpses of brilliance; Section 1, despite its HowTo: tone, might be rescued; and the lists obviously have to go. 12:10 Symbol keep vote Saved. Spıke ¬ 12:42 14-Feb-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. We've seen worse. Admit it. It only needs to be improved just a little... --RockoRocks (talk) 17:54, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep. per above. --Mn-z 18:10, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)
  1. Picked this one up on ICU, however it has existed since before 2009 so is too old for ICU. It is mostly made up of lists and not particularly amusing lists at that. --ChiefjusticeWii 08:19, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Symbol for vote Kept via rewrite; Sv--me. Spıke ¬ 14:44 15-Feb-13

The Gay Team

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Smallish, typographically ugly article presses two chronic Spike hot-buttons: (1) The title is a pun, and the reader has to already know the pun to enjoy the article; (2) The page is an Anon magnet, inviting grade-school humor from Anons who cannot do better than gay-bashing and puns. I have nothing against gay-bashing, if done with cleverness, but this is not it; and then again, if you were to write it, why would you misplace it here? Spıke ¬ 18:41 13-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. really doesn't do anything the title-pun. --Mn-z 13:47, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Take an outdated meme. Mash it together with another outdated meme. Add homophobic humour. Then delete the ugly thing.                               Puppy's talk page11:51 16 Feb
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:37, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Category:Folk Force

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. category has been mostly emptied due to VFD. It is almost, but not quite, small enough to QVFD. --Mn-z 16:34, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Again, this arc of Uncyclopedia pages is mostly untouched in 7 years, and Wikipedia has not heard of the Folk Force nor of the several members for which I searched. Spıke ¬ 16:38 9-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Old vanity. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:39, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

The Botanist

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --Mn-z 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Oddball piece of fiction about a non-notable bad guy. Spıke ¬ 02:08 5-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Old unfunny vanity. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:39, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

2012 (Video Game)

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. The game was deleted. This was just another advertisement for a crappy text adventure from a now banned user.                               Puppy's talk page12:46 15 Feb
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 14:28, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per above. Spıke ¬ 14:34 15-Feb-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:36, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Scooter

Score: 2
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Long winded and crufty. Fanboyish.                               Puppy's talk page11:04 31 Jan
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. --ChiefjusticeWii 08:10, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • German bandcruft, accumulating cruft as an open guestbook would. Am abstaining because I don't know the band; there could be some good stuff for someone who does. Spıke ¬ 12:09 1-Feb-13

Smoky Harry

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is about tobacco incarnate having a chance encounter with the Folk Force. This one is "about" something, but that something is itself randumbo. --Mn-z 16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. What is amaing [sic] is that a typo in the tiny Intro has not been caught in seven years. Spıke ¬ 12:15 1-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Yikes. This is worse than bindweed. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Moses Purple

Score: 2
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is not that bad, but it has too much randumbo and forced association with the Folk Force to really be good. However, I wrote a similar article at Uncle Tom that I think says everything that was worth saying in this article, but better, with less randumbo, and with a pagename that someone might search for. --Mn-z 15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If you say it has to do with the Folk Force, then it has to do with something, although it doesn't seem to. It is a ramble by Anon from 2006. It only contains humor if mentioning stock racial stereotypes on the page is funny. Spıke ¬ 15:41 31-Jan-13
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. there is a version early in the edit history that is "about" the folk force, but is even worse than the stock racial stereotypes. --Mn-z 15:57, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

CANQU

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This typographically ugly article about nothing has been abandoned since 2008, and can you blame us? Spıke ¬ 00:50 12-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I've read the entire article and i still don't get exactly about what this is. --RockoRocks (talk) 17:42, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. What purpose is a spork when we don't know what it was sporked from. Google gives us nothing except coming back here. Ugly and unfunny.                               Puppy's talk page06:34 14 Feb
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --ChiefjusticeWii 08:11, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Kept, 6-4, by VFD in 2008. One keeper called it an "obvious parody of a boring wikipedia article" but the 2008 nominator says he found nothing on Google or Wikipedia. Spıke ¬ 00:50 12-Feb-13

Extreme Hide and Seek

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. I was going to quoticide and remove Listcruft as well as general QC based removal, but realised I'd be left with about one paragraph. Maybe an Undictonary item, but not enough to sustain an article.                               Puppy's talk page12:47 12 Feb
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. There is nothing here but an Anon magnet--as we are seeing today. Spıke ¬ 00:53 12-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 14:33, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Mecha-Pope

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. makes Pope Fuck look good. Untouched since 2006 except for a category removal. --Mn-z 16:58, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Serial meme-cruft for the "pedophiles/fucktards." That both these articles use nonsense year numbers is one facet of acting out against the Catholic Church rather than writing anything seriously amusing (which would involve a basis in reality). Spıke ¬ 17:11 11-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Title better than the article that followed. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:04, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't get it man --RockoRocks (talk) 21:04, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Even the Alicia Keys vandal on the mirror site didn't like this article and redirected it to Pope. I am inclined to do the same. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:24, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • It would be fun, especially now, to assemble a set of Popes, comparable to our Jesii and Preggos, but these articles are both crap. Spıke ¬ 17:11 11-Feb-13
  • Failed VFD 5-0: Deleted. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:28, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Pope Fuck

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A grade-school rant sandbox. Spıke ¬ 16:45 11-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. how did survive so long? --Mn-z 16:53, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Papal Bull. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:05, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. Too much random numbers and other nonsense. This is just a bunch of unfunny randomness. Also some stupid meme references. Besides, writing an article about something that does not really exist is not that funny (like this "Pope Fuck" thing). --RockoRocks (talk) 17:39, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Fuck Alexander Pope, I agree. Can someone come up with code so we could vote on these easier? I'd vote to delete most of them if it didn't take so much time. Boring. Aleister 19:24 same day, 13th
Comments

🔒 Toast Wars H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -3
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. In contrast to Mecha-Pope, this one starts with a little erudition. (I can add no more of that, but Romartus certainly can.) I'll go in and clean it up. Spıke ¬ 17:15 11-Feb-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Quirky. Added a few extra lines. Not a feature but desperately bad either. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:03, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep. Aha.. here's the problem! Too many bad jokes! You know what they say.. all toasters... toast toast!--RockoRocks (talk) 21:04, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)

Symbol delete vote Delete. wacky war. withdrawn per fixing. --Mn-z 17:02, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. its better, but I still don't get it. --Mn-z 17:28, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
    As I see it, an insane attempt to force together elements of the history of Catholicism with the elements of a fine breakfast (converging, of course, on the Earl of Sandwich). Spıke ¬ 17:33 11-Feb-13
    I have put out a call to Romartus, our scholar of the Inanities. Spıke ¬ 17:36 11-Feb-13

  • Symbol for vote Kept per fix. Spıke ¬ 21:04 11-Feb-13

Sarvajanik College of Engineering and Technology

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Paragraphs are short, generic slaps at the institution that will amuse no one other than the author. Cruft from 2006, substantially unchanged since then. Spıke ¬ 11:52 1-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. typical town-cruft. Half generic and half about stuff that only some who went to that college would get. --Mn-z 13:43, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Concur. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:01, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Polytechnic University of Bucharest

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Abandon all hope, ye who enter here! Has nothing original or funny to say about the institution before it descends into lists. Spıke ¬ 21:36 28-Jan-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. this would be towncruft if the randumbo were taken out of it. --Mn-z 15:21, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Beyond the question “Why do men have nipples?” it's schoolcruft.                               Puppy's talk page11:16 05 Feb
Comments

🔒 HowTo:Cheat on RuneScape H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -1
Keep (1)
  1. I've seen worse. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:15 Feb 8 2013
Delete (0)
  • Unfunny, ugly, and poorly written. Needs to go to Heaven now. --Snippy 08:26, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Symbol neutral vote Stain on my lower torso. Cut it to shreds to remove the worst of it an added bits and bobs to give it a loose concept. Not brilliant by a long shot, and I won't cry about it's deletion if that's the way it goes, but it's passable IMFAO.                               Puppy's talk page10:41 06 Feb
  • Hey, that's no so bad anymore. I'll Symbol neutral vote abstain for now. --Snippy 21:19, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

  • Symbol for vote Kept. Nomination is withdrawn and no one voted to delete. Spıke ¬ 16:41 9-Feb-13

🔒 Harriet Tubman H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Its about the subject, and probably the only way to make this article funny is to make it "racist," aka calling Tubman a property stealing terrorist. --Mn-z 10:49, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. May not be the funniest but there is a lot of content here and a lot to build off of. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:20 Feb 8 2013
Delete (0)

No delete votes.

Comments
  • Symbol for vote Kept. No sentiment anywhere to delete, except the newbie on the article's talk page, who might have learned how to do it but didn't care enough to come vote or present that opinion. Mordillo used to parcel out token bans for wasting voters' time. Happily for Puppy, these days there aren't any. Spıke ¬ 16:54 9-Feb-13

Talk:Pizza Planet

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. MTTB blanked this page, and I tend to agree with him. If it weren't for the age of it I'd add it to QVFD, but it has floated around long enough that it should be VFD'd. It's not a comment or discussion on the article, but an attempt to write the article in the talk space. NRV.                               Puppy's talk page08:58 05 Feb
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. We tend to let people say a lot of things about the article on the discussion page, but this is not discussion about the article at all; it is a submission. And NRV is right. Delete the talk page only. Spıke ¬ 12:04 5-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't like using VFD to remove talk page clutter in principle, but I have better things to do than argue policy. --Mn-z 21:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Al Obama

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is a copy of Alabama where author has transliterated every "Alabama" into "Al Obama". That is, if this pun occurs to you, you can type it into Uncyclopedia and see the pun in a real article. But you have already finished laughing, haven't you? Spıke ¬ 18:21 3-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 20:48, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. If these things didn't take so much time I'd vote delete on most of them. Al 22:40 3-2-'13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Redundant redundancy. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 01:42, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Concur. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:56, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Folk Force

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. worse than Strings McPickens and many of its satellite articles that have already been deleted. --Mn-z 16:05, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I have become convinced of the non-notability of the Folk Force. This piece of Anon's personal fiction arc almost enters the genre of Wacky War. Spıke ¬ 02:10 5-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Where has this been hiding? -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:57, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:16 Feb 8 2013
Comments

Strings McPickens

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. leader of the folk force. This article isn't as bad as the typical folk force article, but there isn't really a point to it either. If there was one article in the series that might not be bad enough to delete, this is probably it. However, I also dislike crappy orphaned articles hanging in space. --Mn-z 16:02, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I have been avoiding these votes because I don't know anything about the Folk Force. Surprise! neither does Wikipedia; nor about Strings McPickens. On this one, three paragraphs and one photo have been added since Anon created the page seven years ago. Spıke ¬ 02:05 5-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Truly abandoned and orphaned. Now time to go. -- Laurels RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:58, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Not funny in the slightest --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:17 Feb 8 2013
Comments
Personal tools
projects