Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive271

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(archived)
(Archive)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Archive|../}}
 
{{Archive|../}}
 
----
 
----
  +
== [[JC-bashers]] ==
  +
{{Votervfd|time=11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=#{{delete}} Randumbo with a hint of advocacy. It has largely been untouched since 2006, except for a wannabe-maintenance template. I think it might be a parody of Jehovah's Witnesses, since it seems that JC-bashers are Christians. (JC = Jesus Christ, I assume). Or maybe JC-bashers are bible thumpers. Whatever this article is supposed to be about, I assume we probably have (or should have) a better version somewhere. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Yes, exactly "randumbo with a hint of advocacy." If you are going to take on strident advocates/opponents of a sect (includes Glenn Beck), be playful and not extreme-sounding yourself--and above all, don't write crap. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:12 16-Feb-13</small>
  +
#I like [[Uncyclopedia:Legal_Department/JCbashers]], but I also like [[An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective]]. I wouldn't want to reinstate the original article in that case either. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Just not funny enough, looks like it was written by an 11 year old, except for the legal department link. That part was funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:51, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  +
|comments=
  +
*I've heard “JC bashers” used as a term for any grass roots Christian evangelist movement. It's not a common phrase here either though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
  +
}}
  +
 
== [[Winx Club]] ==
 
== [[Winx Club]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:26, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:26, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:15, February 19, 2013


JC-bashers

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Randumbo with a hint of advocacy. It has largely been untouched since 2006, except for a wannabe-maintenance template. I think it might be a parody of Jehovah's Witnesses, since it seems that JC-bashers are Christians. (JC = Jesus Christ, I assume). Or maybe JC-bashers are bible thumpers. Whatever this article is supposed to be about, I assume we probably have (or should have) a better version somewhere. --Mn-z 11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Yes, exactly "randumbo with a hint of advocacy." If you are going to take on strident advocates/opponents of a sect (includes Glenn Beck), be playful and not extreme-sounding yourself--and above all, don't write crap. Spıke ¬ 12:12 16-Feb-13
  3. I like Uncyclopedia:Legal_Department/JCbashers, but I also like An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective. I wouldn't want to reinstate the original article in that case either.                               Puppy's talk page12:28 16 Feb
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Just not funny enough, looks like it was written by an 11 year old, except for the legal department link. That part was funny. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:51, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Winx Club

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Scattershot article that confuses memes, naughty bits, and random fetishes for humor. In addition it is only linked to from a list in Fnoodle's userspace. --Mn-z 08:26, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete.                               Puppy's talk page10:59 17 Feb
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This does not deliver enjoyment to the reader but only to an author who wants to write about kiddie porn. If there really is such a TV show, start over. Spıke ¬ 14:30 17-Feb-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Oh my god, so much weird-ass and creepy fetishes on this page... it's almost just like deviantART!! This page also contains too much profanity and spelling mistakes--RockoRocks (talk) 21:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • One more thing. If this page gets deleted, can we please delete all those creepy fetish images that are currently on the page aswell. Thanks, --RockoRocks (talk) 21:54, February 18, 2013 (UTC) (specifially, File:Brúm_peidorrenta.JPG, File:Istéllo.JPG, File:Potrancas.JPG and File:Sadomazô.JPG
    Rocko, look at what I've done--made them into links and start with : so as to cite the photos without displaying them--Specify in this way to make the job easier. Except for a three-year-old reference to one of them in a Forum, all four will become orphans and will be deleted, as you can see by clicking through to the image description pages. Spıke ¬ 22:15 18-Feb-13

🔒 Terms of Use H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2
Keep (2)
  1. I believe I am the Admin to whom Mnbvcxz refers. The cases where I didn't realize something was a joke are numerous and legend. In the case I was thinking about, I patrolled an edit to this page and reported it in passing to Sannse without viewing the page as a whole. Although it does air grievances with Wikia and risks attracting trolling by resentful users and perhaps from the Fork, it is seriously funny. We ought to have room for a page imitating legalism, but with a litany not to "publish, copy, display, distribute, [or] put mayonnaise on"--especially when it already has a disclaimer at the start that it's not the real thing. Spıke ¬ 19:04 14-Feb-13
    Actually, Wikia is not mentioned in here at all.                               Puppy's talk page07:55 15 Feb
    No, not by name; but some of the material seems to be motivated by real-world gripes. Spıke ¬ 16:07 15-Feb-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Too funny to let die. Besides, if you actually read it, or even scan it, you will realize it isn't the real thing, besides there's a disclaimer at the top pointing to the real thing. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 07:05, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. and soft redirect to Wikia's real terms of use. This fake page has confused even an admin, and isn't that funny. --Mn-z 18:07, February 14, 2013 (UTC) withdrawn per consensus and lack of deletion support. --Mn-z 19:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Suicidal Tendencies

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't know who this band is, but I'm going to wager R.J. Herrera did not loose his penis in a house fire in 1776, and the band wasn't founded in 666 AD. --Mn-z 12:13, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I remember the band from back in the day. But this article is as enticing as a bucket of peelings from a man with leprosy.                               Puppy's talk page12:22 16 Feb
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. What Puppy would call a "fanboy rant" with horrible typography. Also perhaps the website's longest red-link referencing masturbation. Spıke ¬ 12:23 16-Feb-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Concur. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:41, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Robotic ghost pirates

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
Picard-wtf

Picard doesn't like this article.

  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. very short and random article. Although it has been edited several times recently, it seems to consist of the 2006 formula "find a funny title, add funny pics, and fill out the text with randumbo". --Mn-z 11:27, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. All of the quotes are filler. Nonsense year number. Mere naming of Dick Cheney assumed to be a joke. (Who knew it would get to be 2013?) Documented like, yawn, a Pokémon card. And everything nominator sets out. Spıke ¬ 11:39 16-Feb-13
  3. I agree with Picard completely.                               Puppy's talk page11:49 16 Feb
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:36, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

🔒 Glasses H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The intro has glimpses of brilliance; Section 1, despite its HowTo: tone, might be rescued; and the lists obviously have to go. 12:10 Symbol keep vote Saved. Spıke ¬ 12:42 14-Feb-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. We've seen worse. Admit it. It only needs to be improved just a little... --RockoRocks (talk) 17:54, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep. per above. --Mn-z 18:10, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)
  1. Picked this one up on ICU, however it has existed since before 2009 so is too old for ICU. It is mostly made up of lists and not particularly amusing lists at that. --ChiefjusticeXBox360 08:19, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Symbol for vote Kept via rewrite; Sv--me. Spıke ¬ 14:44 15-Feb-13

The Gay Team

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Smallish, typographically ugly article presses two chronic Spike hot-buttons: (1) The title is a pun, and the reader has to already know the pun to enjoy the article; (2) The page is an Anon magnet, inviting grade-school humor from Anons who cannot do better than gay-bashing and puns. I have nothing against gay-bashing, if done with cleverness, but this is not it; and then again, if you were to write it, why would you misplace it here? Spıke ¬ 18:41 13-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. really doesn't do anything the title-pun. --Mn-z 13:47, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Take an outdated meme. Mash it together with another outdated meme. Add homophobic humour. Then delete the ugly thing.                               Puppy's talk page11:51 16 Feb
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:37, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Category:Folk Force

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. category has been mostly emptied due to VFD. It is almost, but not quite, small enough to QVFD. --Mn-z 16:34, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Again, this arc of Uncyclopedia pages is mostly untouched in 7 years, and Wikipedia has not heard of the Folk Force nor of the several members for which I searched. Spıke ¬ 16:38 9-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Old vanity. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:39, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

The Botanist

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --Mn-z 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Oddball piece of fiction about a non-notable bad guy. Spıke ¬ 02:08 5-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Old unfunny vanity. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:39, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

2012 (Video Game)

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. The game was deleted. This was just another advertisement for a crappy text adventure from a now banned user.                               Puppy's talk page12:46 15 Feb
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 14:28, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Per above. Spıke ¬ 14:34 15-Feb-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:36, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Scooter

Score: 2
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Long winded and crufty. Fanboyish.                               Puppy's talk page11:04 31 Jan
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. --ChiefjusticeXBox360 08:10, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • German bandcruft, accumulating cruft as an open guestbook would. Am abstaining because I don't know the band; there could be some good stuff for someone who does. Spıke ¬ 12:09 1-Feb-13

Smoky Harry

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is about tobacco incarnate having a chance encounter with the Folk Force. This one is "about" something, but that something is itself randumbo. --Mn-z 16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. What is amaing [sic] is that a typo in the tiny Intro has not been caught in seven years. Spıke ¬ 12:15 1-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Yikes. This is worse than bindweed. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Moses Purple

Score: 2
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is not that bad, but it has too much randumbo and forced association with the Folk Force to really be good. However, I wrote a similar article at Uncle Tom that I think says everything that was worth saying in this article, but better, with less randumbo, and with a pagename that someone might search for. --Mn-z 15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If you say it has to do with the Folk Force, then it has to do with something, although it doesn't seem to. It is a ramble by Anon from 2006. It only contains humor if mentioning stock racial stereotypes on the page is funny. Spıke ¬ 15:41 31-Jan-13
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. there is a version early in the edit history that is "about" the folk force, but is even worse than the stock racial stereotypes. --Mn-z 15:57, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

CANQU

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This typographically ugly article about nothing has been abandoned since 2008, and can you blame us? Spıke ¬ 00:50 12-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I've read the entire article and i still don't get exactly about what this is. --RockoRocks (talk) 17:42, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. What purpose is a spork when we don't know what it was sporked from. Google gives us nothing except coming back here. Ugly and unfunny.                               Puppy's talk page06:34 14 Feb
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --ChiefjusticeXBox360 08:11, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Kept, 6-4, by VFD in 2008. One keeper called it an "obvious parody of a boring wikipedia article" but the 2008 nominator says he found nothing on Google or Wikipedia. Spıke ¬ 00:50 12-Feb-13

Extreme Hide and Seek

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. I was going to quoticide and remove Listcruft as well as general QC based removal, but realised I'd be left with about one paragraph. Maybe an Undictonary item, but not enough to sustain an article.                               Puppy's talk page12:47 12 Feb
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. There is nothing here but an Anon magnet--as we are seeing today. Spıke ¬ 00:53 12-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 14:33, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Mecha-Pope

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. makes Pope Fuck look good. Untouched since 2006 except for a category removal. --Mn-z 16:58, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Serial meme-cruft for the "pedophiles/fucktards." That both these articles use nonsense year numbers is one facet of acting out against the Catholic Church rather than writing anything seriously amusing (which would involve a basis in reality). Spıke ¬ 17:11 11-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Title better than the article that followed. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:04, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't get it man --RockoRocks (talk) 21:04, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Even the Alicia Keys vandal on the mirror site didn't like this article and redirected it to Pope. I am inclined to do the same. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:24, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • It would be fun, especially now, to assemble a set of Popes, comparable to our Jesii and Preggos, but these articles are both crap. Spıke ¬ 17:11 11-Feb-13
  • Failed VFD 5-0: Deleted. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:28, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Pope Fuck

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A grade-school rant sandbox. Spıke ¬ 16:45 11-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. how did survive so long? --Mn-z 16:53, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Papal Bull. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:05, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. Too much random numbers and other nonsense. This is just a bunch of unfunny randomness. Also some stupid meme references. Besides, writing an article about something that does not really exist is not that funny (like this "Pope Fuck" thing). --RockoRocks (talk) 17:39, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Fuck Alexander Pope, I agree. Can someone come up with code so we could vote on these easier? I'd vote to delete most of them if it didn't take so much time. Boring. Aleister 19:24 same day, 13th
Comments

🔒 Toast Wars H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -3
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. In contrast to Mecha-Pope, this one starts with a little erudition. (I can add no more of that, but Romartus certainly can.) I'll go in and clean it up. Spıke ¬ 17:15 11-Feb-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Quirky. Added a few extra lines. Not a feature but desperately bad either. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:03, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep. Aha.. here's the problem! Too many bad jokes! You know what they say.. all toasters... toast toast!--RockoRocks (talk) 21:04, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)

Symbol delete vote Delete. wacky war. withdrawn per fixing. --Mn-z 17:02, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. its better, but I still don't get it. --Mn-z 17:28, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
    As I see it, an insane attempt to force together elements of the history of Catholicism with the elements of a fine breakfast (converging, of course, on the Earl of Sandwich). Spıke ¬ 17:33 11-Feb-13
    I have put out a call to Romartus, our scholar of the Inanities. Spıke ¬ 17:36 11-Feb-13

  • Symbol for vote Kept per fix. Spıke ¬ 21:04 11-Feb-13

Sarvajanik College of Engineering and Technology

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Paragraphs are short, generic slaps at the institution that will amuse no one other than the author. Cruft from 2006, substantially unchanged since then. Spıke ¬ 11:52 1-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. typical town-cruft. Half generic and half about stuff that only some who went to that college would get. --Mn-z 13:43, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Concur. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:01, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Polytechnic University of Bucharest

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Abandon all hope, ye who enter here! Has nothing original or funny to say about the institution before it descends into lists. Spıke ¬ 21:36 28-Jan-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. this would be towncruft if the randumbo were taken out of it. --Mn-z 15:21, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Beyond the question “Why do men have nipples?” it's schoolcruft.                               Puppy's talk page11:16 05 Feb
Comments

🔒 HowTo:Cheat on RuneScape H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -1
Keep (1)
  1. I've seen worse. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:15 Feb 8 2013
Delete (0)
  • Unfunny, ugly, and poorly written. Needs to go to Heaven now. --Snippy 08:26, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Symbol neutral vote Stain on my lower torso. Cut it to shreds to remove the worst of it an added bits and bobs to give it a loose concept. Not brilliant by a long shot, and I won't cry about it's deletion if that's the way it goes, but it's passable IMFAO.                               Puppy's talk page10:41 06 Feb
  • Hey, that's no so bad anymore. I'll Symbol neutral vote abstain for now. --Snippy 21:19, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

  • Symbol for vote Kept. Nomination is withdrawn and no one voted to delete. Spıke ¬ 16:41 9-Feb-13

🔒 Harriet Tubman H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: -2
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Its about the subject, and probably the only way to make this article funny is to make it "racist," aka calling Tubman a property stealing terrorist. --Mn-z 10:49, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. May not be the funniest but there is a lot of content here and a lot to build off of. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:20 Feb 8 2013
Delete (0)

No delete votes.

Comments
  • Symbol for vote Kept. No sentiment anywhere to delete, except the newbie on the article's talk page, who might have learned how to do it but didn't care enough to come vote or present that opinion. Mordillo used to parcel out token bans for wasting voters' time. Happily for Puppy, these days there aren't any. Spıke ¬ 16:54 9-Feb-13

Talk:Pizza Planet

Score: 3
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. MTTB blanked this page, and I tend to agree with him. If it weren't for the age of it I'd add it to QVFD, but it has floated around long enough that it should be VFD'd. It's not a comment or discussion on the article, but an attempt to write the article in the talk space. NRV.                               Puppy's talk page08:58 05 Feb
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. We tend to let people say a lot of things about the article on the discussion page, but this is not discussion about the article at all; it is a submission. And NRV is right. Delete the talk page only. Spıke ¬ 12:04 5-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't like using VFD to remove talk page clutter in principle, but I have better things to do than argue policy. --Mn-z 21:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Al Obama

Score: 5
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is a copy of Alabama where author has transliterated every "Alabama" into "Al Obama". That is, if this pun occurs to you, you can type it into Uncyclopedia and see the pun in a real article. But you have already finished laughing, haven't you? Spıke ¬ 18:21 3-Feb-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. per above. --Mn-z 20:48, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. If these things didn't take so much time I'd vote delete on most of them. Al 22:40 3-2-'13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Redundant redundancy. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 01:42, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Concur. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:56, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Folk Force

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. worse than Strings McPickens and many of its satellite articles that have already been deleted. --Mn-z 16:05, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I have become convinced of the non-notability of the Folk Force. This piece of Anon's personal fiction arc almost enters the genre of Wacky War. Spıke ¬ 02:10 5-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Where has this been hiding? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:57, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:16 Feb 8 2013
Comments

Strings McPickens

Score: 4
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. leader of the folk force. This article isn't as bad as the typical folk force article, but there isn't really a point to it either. If there was one article in the series that might not be bad enough to delete, this is probably it. However, I also dislike crappy orphaned articles hanging in space. --Mn-z 16:02, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I have been avoiding these votes because I don't know anything about the Folk Force. Surprise! neither does Wikipedia; nor about Strings McPickens. On this one, three paragraphs and one photo have been added since Anon created the page seven years ago. Spıke ¬ 02:05 5-Feb-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Truly abandoned and orphaned. Now time to go. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:58, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Not funny in the slightest --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:17 Feb 8 2013
Comments
Personal tools
projects