This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
What is this I don't evenSaberwolf116 (talk) 06:49, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
I'ma finnish and I don't even know who is he. Many grammar mistakes, I think some finnish has written this and not even gave a thought that no one knows him. Also, didn't laugh at all. Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz09:09, 23June, 2012(UTC)
Delete. Tanner was a Prime Minister of Finland; don't know what it's supposed to prove that Cat doesn't know this. I love pidgin English, but this article is not some Uncyclopedian's try at another Borat, but Finnish DudeMan's lame attempt at English and at humor involving a totally obscure (for English-speakers) topic. Spıke¬ 09:56 23-Jun-12
Nom. This article on a nonexistent Mexican city has been stalled since 2007, its claim to not be plagiarized is not convincing, and its initial section on Contributors suggests that its purpose might be vanity. Did I mention it is not funny? Spıke¬ 15:50 22-Jun-12
Keep. It is an article about a real person, keyed off actual aspects of that person. Portraying him as a disease isn't flattering nor as clever as it could be, but choice of humor technique is up to the current author, or to a future one. Spıke¬ 21:20 18-Jun-12
Keep. This is actually pretty funny at times, though I do believe the scope of the concept is rather limited. --Scofield & Friends 13:39, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
/me shoots paper spit wad through hollowed out biro at Georgie, then hisses--Sycamore(Talk) 14:59, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
An article about will.i.am could be decent under a different focus but it really doesn't work as a disease. SirGeorgie•Harangue•Mediocracy 20:21, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
It could definitely do with some improvement but as it is, it's passable. SirGeorgie•Harangue•Mediocracy 20:16, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (4)
Nom. Begun by Bdanials in 2005 and added to by Anon late in that year, it does not have enough quality to overcome the fact that it is about nothing and no one would ever visit it. Is the joke that it is Third-World (as in cholera), rural (as in cornfields), or urban? Spıke¬ 17:31 17-Jun-12
The joke is that it is a large university in a small town. (You know, like half of the mid-majors.) On your travels, I'm sure you've been through East Bumble Fuck. Everybody has. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jun 17 '12 18:26 (UTC)
No, but I grew up in Snake's Hips. Spıke¬ 18:32 17-Jun-12
PS--The article on Bumblefuck remains and is in much better shape. Spıke¬ 00:30 18-Jun-12
Keep Frosty has thawed it. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:05, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)
Nom. This has a principal author, UotM-nominated Gspbeetle, evidently in the PRC, but his ability to improve or even view an article about "propaganda centers in all over communist china" might be limited given current politics, he hasn't been around in 11 months, and the last post on his user page says he "has left the game." The article has an outline seemingly based on reality, filled with text that is ranty and random. Spıke¬ 17:13 17-Jun-12
That is...that is bad. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jun 17 '12 18:34 (UTC)
Delete please. --BlackFlamingo 16:45, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
I actually like some of the acronyms, but it's just a list and doesn't belong on this site. --Alpha Quintesson (talk) 18:10, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
Now hold on just a gosh-darned minute. You have two cows is a series of funny lists. Some lists are acceptable here, IF THEY'RE FUNNY. Funny trumps everything else. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jun 17 '12 18:14 (UTC)
Ohhhh, I get it. It's a list of car manufacturers' names, with the assumption that each name is an acronym. See, like FIAT is an acronym for Fix It Again, Tony. (Actually it's Fabbrica Italiana Automobili Torino but the other one is funnier and more accurate.) I might be in favor of keeping this as "List of car manufacturer name acronym thingamajiggies" (...or something), if all the retarded shit like "Dicks On Da Grating Erection Bringing All Lesbians Live" were removed. Maybe. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jun 17 '12 18:20 (UTC)
Removed stupidity, reformatted. Choosing to abstain now. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jun 17 '12 18:20 (UTC)
Enduring stupid sequences of nonsense words (USA PATRIOT Act, CAN SPAM Act, DREAM Act) to gussy up epic-fail ideas is one hazard of following US politics. I hate manufactured acronyms. Bizzeebeever has prettied up the article, but it does not belong as our article on "Car manufacturers"--only somewhere where a reader would find it if he wanted something on acronyms. I'll rescind my vote if this is renamed. Spıke¬ 18:30 17-Jun-12
The list is much less ugly and more manageable now that Bizzeebeever cleaned it up, so I'm also abstaining. --Alpha Quintesson (talk) 18:47, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
Google turned up nothing, and it fucking sucks beyond all reason. Delete. --Nikau (talk) 13:32, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
RAN-DOM GAR-BAGE. This article has been Expand-tagged for over nine months. So, no. It has had its chance. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jun 21 '12 19:42 (UTC)
Delete. (Formerly Keep--Rename to Uwe Boll.) This article is very much about something: the low-budget German movie director. That its name is not one of Boll's drive-by filmings, or anything else that a reader would look for, is a problem easily corrected. At that point, the 30-day clock of the {{Expand}} tag should tick away.15:27 21-Jun-12 BB's reading of the history is correct; this article doesn't have enough and isn't going anywhere. Spıke¬ 19:51 21-Jun-12
Yeah, I'm not really sure what's going on here. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 21:51, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
Very, Very, Very Weak Keep I reviewed this like a week ago. It gots potential but needs work.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 16:24, June 20, 2012 (UT
Delete (5)
Seriously, who plays this bullshit.173.70.31.99 (Talk • Contribs(del) • Block(rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser) states on the talk page: "It just sounds like...'Fuck, fuck, fuck, gay person, fuck, fuck, fuck, I hate life, fuck, fuck, fuck, I kill you all and I enjoy it, fuck, fuck, fuck...' Vulgar indeed, but the article is indeed rather stupid." He's right; author delights in cutting down a videogame, without any cleverness in describing it. Spıke¬ 13:02 20-Jun-12
Bullsh!t Weak, self-referencing intro followed by a tangle of cussing and randomness. --SirCuteKyogreOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0)] 21:59, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
I don't know the game, and this article doesn't make me give a damn. The only thing that separates it from the original article (which, praise be unto the Polysexual Tentacle Demon, was also destroyed within this moon, yea, verily) is that it is ..."abridged". The worst part is, I suspect the author(s) are intending to write more articleson this game series (which I have never heard of and cannot be made to give a shit about). ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jun 21 '12 21:21 (UTC)
Alone? Dull topic, but some of the humour was subtle and sublime. Change title to SUDDENLY, I fucked a wizard!!!! Dude, legit. maybe? Nikau (talk) 15:28, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Rathfarnham is evidently a real place, but there's no humor here (nor photos). Nearby "mountains strike paranoia and trepidation into any that gaze at it"? Why, please? "It is unclear who Fearnán actually was" but less unclear than why this article is here. It is halfway to quaint. Spıke¬ 21:24 18-Jun-12
Disintegrate. Oh man, it's been way too long since I got a chance to use that template. Saberwolf116 (talk) 22:56, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. This overlong piece of toilet humor has nothing to do with the first Malaysian astronaut. Spıke¬ 01:02 18-Jun-12
Delete I think it could have done with more references to anuses. Just too few purile insinuations of homosexuality for a keep. Nikau (talk) 14:58, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
Nom. Bizzeebeever has made improvements to {{Infobox University}} and has dredged up a list of articles that misused it. Now we have a list of articles that use or misuse it, and I will be taxing your patience by nominating those that contain nothing that isn't true, trite ("numorous dress codes, stiff regulations, and other such rules that allow no freedom of movement"), or funny only to the students of the same school. In this one, Master Nick Dorfner touts himself in an article about the high school in Essex "(Junction for you fuckwits that care)", Vermont. Spıke¬ 16:38 17-Jun-12
I don't know what the fuck this is. It looks like random "2006-cruft". If it's not, y'know, vote keep or whatever. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jun 16 '12 15:47 (UTC)
Delete. Childish, including throwaway quotes, dumb intro, first illustration probably stolen, raping the "garima," and some of the least clever fake "exams" ever devised. Spıke¬ 11:37 9-Jun-12
Some parts were okay but overall, it was pretty bad. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 21:11, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
Some was funny, but just not good enough for redemption... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 18:43, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
Just to chip in what Socky is saying - We're not Wikipedia - We're a comedy website. Where the emphasis should be been on funny, which is per se, plural and not a fixed standard - if some good is there, it should be kept.-Sycamore(Talk) 23:09, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. This page has been in the rewrite category for what must be years now. It lacks a general unifying concept or idea and isn't particularly funny. I bring it here because I feel we should have this page, but that it is doing more harm than good if it is left in its current state. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:05, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
Delete As Spike says this has a clear strategy. None of it is funny. And I mean none of it. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:29, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Has a clear comedy strategy: Treat the genre as chemical elements. Its flaw is that it goes on for way too long. Sections that don't correspond to actual, major rock groups should go, now. I am not the one to save this; aren't Aleister and Funnybony our resident metal-heads? Spıke¬ 13:08 13-Jun-12
Abstain, but I HAVE A REWRITE DRAFT KICKING AROUND IN MY USERSPACE. I attempted to rewrite Heavy Metals a while back but just saved the result as a .doc. I'm probably not gonna touch it, but if anyone wants to work on it, be my guest. Talk!Contribs! 15:20, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. From the claim of divine inspiration to banning the pill to the need to dress up for Sunday School, this is a simple hatchet job. Please vote not on whether anything it says is untrue but only on whether it contains any trace of cleverness. Spıke¬ 19:34 8-Jun-12
This page to Hell! I haven't finished reading this but it's too serious for me. --SirCuteKyogreOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0)] 00:57, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Author is not rip-roaringly funny and heavy into Randumbo, but he is doing what we're supposed to be doing: Take a subject, in this case a "popular vector meme," and follow it into a whimsical alternate reality while claiming to be its authoritative encyclopedia entry. Spıke¬ 11:53 8-Jun-12
Keep. Per Spike--Sycamore(Talk) 18:42, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Don't see the problem really. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 10:54, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
Obliterate. Hmm. A meme I have never heard of. This makes me want to go read more "Dolan Duk" comics... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 18:41, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain. the article is created in about 1 month or so (forgot exact time) and it just escaped icu, yet it was VFD after a short time.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 07:36, June 8, 2012 (UTC)
Burninate this! Not only it's short, there are no pictures, the formatting is bad and worst of all, it is short! |Si PlebiusDato' (Sir)Joeang GiratinaCUN|ICKill| 03:23, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Invalid nom. All that Joe says is true. It is also tagged with {{ICU}} and less than a week old. Spıke¬ 03:30 13-Jun-12
Yeah. And if you watch the history, the ICU would have ended tomorrow... Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz08:02, 13June, 2012(UTC)
Delete. This is bad. Starts with Chuck Norris and a little WW3 history, then listcruft, then a photo gallery from other websites. A lot of motion without a comedy strategy. Spıke¬ 10:13 12-Jun-12
Firing. Danger Close. My favorite part was when the censoring was used and I could still see the words. It's like censoring a clip to use on the news, but you can still make out everything when it's aired; completely useless, in a sense. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 15:24, June 12, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Reader has to both appreciate XHTML and the process that created it, and think that shouts of EXTREME AWESOMENESS are funny. ("Oh Jesus, how much longer do I have to keep this up?") Yeah, we get the joke: XHTML was over-hyped. Spıke¬ 10:09 12-Jun-12
00110001. This article is a blatant abuse of the fact that XHTML looks like it is "X-treme" because there is an "x" at the start of its name. Plus, binary is the best language and should be used on the web, as well. BINARY DOMINATION. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 15:48, June 12, 2012 (UTC)
I am not able to fix this one, but it needs fixing, which won't be simple. Since 2009, several new books have come out, while this article has gone downhill. The article has one main point--the series is interminable--which the article illustrates by example. But "plenty of fast-paced tea sipping, much smoothing of skirts and more braid-pulling moments than you can shake half a spear at"? That's clever writing. Spıke¬ 15:30 11-Jun-12
Qzekrom's new test will mean all of my articles and most of human knowledge will now be subject to huffing.--Sycamore(Talk) 23:16, June 12, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Of course I don't care that the page is racist, if done in the service of clever humor. But using one article to discuss two opposite stereotypes is not clever. If it had a little more to make the page about the stupidity of the author in trying to come to a conclusion about "Asians" rather than just projecting disdain, we would then run up against the fact that no one is going to look for a page on Asian Timing Syndrome. Spıke¬ 11:27 9-Jun-12
Didn't really need it the last four times it was kept, so I'd say no. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:23, June 8, 2012 (UTC)
1) It is not an in-joke, it is a parody of an in-joke, so a technical, nit-picky screw you, and 2)
Keep - I barf out a crappy stub on a near-weekly basis, so I shouldn't be a stickler. :P --Kip > Talk•Works•• 16:18, Jun. 8, 2012
Pointless counterpoint: The parody of the in-joke is based on an in-joke itself, and this article's own questionably injokiness has itself become an injoke too. so HAH. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 05:12, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
Do we really need to commemorate the brief vandalising of Euroipods by that one guy with "Nintendo" in his username? Evidently we do. Talk!Contribs! 08:47, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
Keep. I like it.--Sycamore(Talk) 21:14, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)
Isn't really that funny page. And it seems that is has been copied from illogciopedia or something. Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz16:31, 9June, 2012(UTC)
Delete. Let's see: It's fun to overuse the word "crap"; and imagine running Firefox or IRC under DOS, furries fighting with cops, and convincing a noob to wipe his hard disk. Fun but not funny. And the page title, which no one will request, is an incidental bit of the content. Spıke¬ 17:09 9-Jun-12
"Sporked from Illogicopedia" doesn't mean "copied from Illogicopedia." 17:09 In fact, "crap" is more genteel than the version there. But let Illogicopedia have it. Spıke¬ 17:15 9-Jun-12
Invalid nom. Page was vandalized before being put up for deletion. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 21:14, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
Obliterate. How about "HowTo:Cut off the fuckin' author's head for creating this"? --SirCuteKyogreOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0)] 23:25, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. I was enthused to see there was yet another treatment of the Venezuelan President to the one I whipped into shape in Venezuela, but this one is a wasteland, which had been vandalized with 20 copies of "This page needs more cowbell" since last October. Chávez is a real person, but this is not based on anything real; the names of statesmen he has dealt with are used purely as memes. Spıke¬ 21:55 6-Jun-12
500 Internal Server Error: Not Following the Damn Article. Commence Huff Protocol Immediately! --SirCuteKyogreOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0)] 01:02, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
Hugo Chavez is a self-aggrandizing punk with a country who maintains his power through faux-populism, intimidation and jails, and you pull out this unfunny pile of crap? We should delete the authors. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jun 7 '12 1:17 (UTC)
Delete. I just don't get this, I think this should be banned from mainspace use since Mr-ex seems to like it. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 04:29, June 6, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. There has been a flurry of Forum activity recently, which is not high in historical terms except for the drastic drop-off in mainspace activity at the same time. This template has no function if you are writing an "encyclopedia" article but only if you are having a public temper tantrum, and it is easier to remove tools such as this than to start chopping off the fingers that grip them. Spıke¬ 10:47 6-Jun-12
Delete as I think it would be difficult to fit this into an article, let alone several articles, in a legitimate and amusing context. pillow talk 23:42, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
Obliterate. While it isn't an atrocious article, it just simply doesn't have even a trace of humour in it. This belongs on an "Alternate History" wiki of some kind, not in a comedy encyclopedia. Although I think there are a couple of good lines in it, there are not enough to justify keeping it. "The fact that there are no summary executions, no gulags, no famines, but an OVER-abundant supply of food" is the single most obvious joke one could have made with this article's concept, yet sadly is the funniest thing I've found. - ENTER CITADELT)alkC)untributionsB)an 14:42, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Dittoes. To the good, author (who hasn't been back in six years) begins the article by explaining the joke to us. Twice. To the bad, there really isn't a joke. Spıke¬ 15:57 5-Jun-12
Now, who wants to write an article about Pyongyang? --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 21:02, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
Has some 'jokes' and I 'almost laughed' but the concept just isn't very good. Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz10:29, 6June, 2012(UTC)
I wasn't laughing. Rather, I was just sitting at my laptop trying to comprehend this sea of redlinks and shouting. I say Launch some random nuclear missile and blow up this article and the place it thinks it's about! --SirCuteKyogreOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0)] 21:20, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
Tag it. Despite author's zeal to write about naughty things and send the reader to YouTube, and his penchant for lists, the material does relate directly to a notable, and notably awful, film. Spıke¬ 13:45 5-Jun-12
Delete (7)
You think your B-grade movie is having production problems? That's NOTHING. This movie's nine-year-old star is addicted to meth, and has strange smells emanating from his BUTTHOLE and was castrated by a flying spear! The male director is going through man-opause! And sperm buttsecks anus gay-blow MONKEYS ON CRACK OMG! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jun 5 '12 10:45 (UTC)
They're deleting 'er! Now, it's getting a vote from me! OH MY GOOOOOOOD!!! --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 20:59, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
Worse than the movie. I didn't know it was possible. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 21:49, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
Keep. I slapped a tag on it - prior to it's expiry adding it here is not really the credo on Uncyclopedia's streets. Ya follow me Dog? Also with such a major topic it would be better this was used as starting point for re-write.--Sycamore(Talk) 17:09, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
I think I'll let the tag be this one's downfall... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 21:04, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (4)
Really not that great; anyone with any real idea can easily start over. SirGeorgie•Harangue•Mediocracy 02:30, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. "His favorite word was 'Shite'" seems also to describe author. Chuck Norris and multiple orgasms in the first sentence. Lame ramble. Spıke¬ 02:41 4-Jun-12
Sycamore, I see nothing here worthy as a starting point for a new article except an Infobox, and that's if all its fields are replaced. Or do you hope a new article states that "Finn McCool...shate out the Giants Causeway to help bring some Scots over"? Having been nominated, we ought to discuss the article, not the propriety of the nomination nor whether your toes got stepped on. Spıke¬ 18:04 4-Jun-12
This article was tagged for thirty days. It is my role here to raise the question of 'propriety' of a nomination. My other views stand on their merit of me having a sense of humour more diverse than yourself--Sycamore(Talk) 19:46, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Pinterest is important, and this article is reasonably funny and mostly based on specific things about Pinterest. Spıke¬ 02:30 4-Jun-12
Ehhhh, not worthy of the main page for sure, but its not deletion worthy either. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 06:43, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
/me hisses at Georgie--Sycamore(Talk) 17:06, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
Weak Keep Not a feature, but not deletion worthy either. It's in the neutral section.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 19:31, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
Pinterest is relatively well-known --Alpha Quintesson (talk) 20:14, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
I have no fucking clue who the ever-loving pussy-fuck Pinterest.com is, but they do have a wikipedia article, AND they apparently market themselves to middle-aged women who do...crafts. I mean, that alone is like a flashing neon sign that says "WE DARE YOU TO MOCK US". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jun 5 '12 7:31 (UTC)
Ok...first VFD of the new era. Let's see: this is what I believe tha Zombee Dewd refers to as "2006cruft". It has no concept or humor and is basically a puddle of randomness. Please destroy it. Thank you. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jun 3 '12 11:05 (UTC)
Delete. "For those of you that [sic] don't know," Greens are environmental extremists; and, however many of their assumptions you share, they are eminently easy to ridicule. This article, by contrast, is free-range babble. Huff and restart. "Above information reliably provided by God." Spıke¬ 11:24 3-Jun-12
If "those of you" refers to humans, one would follow with "who". Spıke¬ 22:55 3-Jun-12
I thought that "that" could also be applied to persons and "who" just stressed the fact that they're persons. I could be wrong, though. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM02:34, 4 June 2012
OK; Shertzer (Pronouns § 5) says parenthetically, "While that may refer to persons, many writers prefer to use who and whom." So just take my larger point that the article is badly written.
I cannot describe how hard this article made me retch. I would like to personally deliver a quart of vomit to each of its authors, with a signed certificate of authenticity. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jun 2 '12 5:55 (UTC)
Delete. Starts off as a neat urban legend parody but quickly degrades into a sickening penis-feast combined with inane pop-culture references. Feel free to move it to my userspace where I can make something bearable out of it. --Scofield & Friends 21:14, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. "Cut the cheese"--Get it??? Fnarr fnarr. Who is Ryan Satin (no Wikipedia page)? OK to userspace to Scofield, but unless you can make it relate to the fabric rather than a specific person (vanity/cyberbullying), do not bring it back to mainspace. Spıke¬ 21:36 2-Jun-12
C-C-COMBO BREAKER!!!!!!!--fcukmanLOOS3R! 03:51, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. I doubt that this is related to any specific person. The surname Satin could be concocted to become part of some silly made up horror story simply because it looks similar to the word Satan. That's my interpretation, anyway. --Scofield & Friends 07:10, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
This is what happens when 1500 different IPs write an article about an obscure, shitty band. (I'm not even sure Angels and Airwaves is shitty. Just taking a guess.) ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jun 2 '12 5:51 (UTC)
I can't imagine any member of Blink-182 making anything even remotely good. --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 06:39, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Angels and Airwaves is real enough to have a Wikipedia page. I usually don't vote on bandcruft, but this page is the tedious formula of making fun of the band's name, then the names of its albums and tracks. There is no cleverness. No one, whether or not they know of the band, will want to read this. Spıke¬ 21:40 2-Jun-12
Delete. An unclever invention of several corps for the Uncyclopedia Wacky War genre. Sycamore, Northern Alliance merits an article, but not this one (which MadMax recently moved from "Naughty Alliance"). Spıke¬ 16:46 31-May-12
"Northern Alliance was founded by Field Marshal Hillary Clinton in 1998 as part of her special operations in charge of the 51st Feminists inside Afghanistan, a rival to the Mujahadiin it is a loose alliance of undercover groups (dressed in Burkha's but with nothing but Black Lingerie, Kalashnikov's and Martial Arts Weapons underneath) and of Denim wearing fearless mountain warriors, this group was branded as being terrorist by the CIA in 2001."
Keep. Per Tintin and Iwillkillyou.--Sycamore(Talk) 16:18, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
I'll totally look like a bandwaggoning poseur by voting "keep" now, but I really do have a soft spot for poorly-written, concept-less gallows humor. Under the right circumstances, of course. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jun 1 '12 0:40 (UTC)
Delete. Tanner was a Prime Minister of Finland; don't know what it's supposed to prove that Cat doesn't know this. I love pidgin English, but this article is not some Uncyclopedian's try at another Borat, but Finnish 
Baseball 
Keep. It's good enough but if someone wanted to rewrite it, I wouldn't complain. --
This page to Hell!
Obliterate. Hmm. A meme I have never heard of. This makes me want to go read more "Dolan Duk" comics... --
Comment. Astonishing what lame things people will turn into memes. 
This bowling ball is funnier. Never heard of this, but it sounds LOTR derived. 
Strong Keep. This rules. --
For. --- 