This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
I think this might have been worked on since it was nommed but, uh, I didn't think it was that bad. Well, apart from the joke about venereal disease but hey, you can like an article without 'getting' all the 'jokes'. -- HindleyiteConverse 12:29, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Per above. He is sexy and all the VFD people should listen very carefully to him...--Sycamore(Talk) 09:21, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
Images is what it needs, but yeah some good stuff. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 11:22, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
Kind of okay. I like the commas, and some of the letters. Aleister 11:31 6-5-'12
Delete (4)
Ugly randomy stubby nonsensey. --BlackFlamingo 21:06, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
Delete It has a lot of redlinks, a lot of lists, and not a lot of funny. There is also an article called The Islamic Republic of Iran, which I think is supposed to be the same geographic region, which makes this redundant. --C₂H₆O(hic) 05:34, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
Both articles suck, but this one is a little bit worse. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 22:29, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
Deli Eat A rip-off of Persia which seems like it has gone out of its way to be worse. Remove so that no man, child or farm animal may see its wretchedness ever again. - ENTER CITADELT)alkC)untributionsB)an 19:57, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
Delete It's a silly article about an actress who only has one real claim to notoriety. It's not funny as much as a jumbled, confused mess.--C₂H₆O(hic) 10:21, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
Comment. The fix tags (or what they have become gratis Skullthumper/Lyrithya) are a really ugly thing... they intrinsically favour soft contributers and admins in their critique of other peoples work and essentially place the actual contributer/writer at their behest. This should be the other way around:/--Sycamore(Talk) 09:29, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
I may be new here, but I see that as your perspective. I'm looking at the articles to fix as a huge opportunity. There are just over 500 articles tagged like this. Some tags are less effort to fix than others. I'm currently going through about 5 or so of these a day and cleaning them up a bit and getting them back out there - but actually making them quality. Some of the articles are well beyond redemption - Yosemite Sam as a case in point. Isn't it better to allow those who have the capacity to fix them an opportunity of minimum 30 days to fix them? (When I started the number was closer to 530, in case you were curious.) --C₂H₆O(hic) 11:16, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
Dudes, with all you guys living in Knowle's suburbs, just walk over there and get a feel for the town, then fix up this page if it needs it. Why delete something which major users use to do their shopping, drinking, and pick-ups. Jeex. Aleister Former Mayor of Knowle West (UTC) (Removed keep vote per MrN, who knows)
Delete (5)
Delete It isn't funny, has no concept, is random, has no images, and is about a town nobody has heard of. The only joke in there is that it isn't Dorridge, which could surprisingly relate to anywhere. Except Dorridge. --C₂H₆O(hic) 10:21, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
Delete I know the area well, and can't fix this article. Too much random, and virtually no actual humour which is actually related to the place. It's just another "this place sucks and is full of chavs" article IMO. MrNFork you! 14:24, May 5
WHERE THE HELL AM I????????? --fcukmanLOOS3R! 08:21, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Knowle West is about 4 miles from my house! MrNFork you! 10:24, May 2
5.2 miles from my house. Thus I am less tainted. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:37, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
Sweet. According to Google, my house is about 120 miles from wherever Knowle West is. How far is everybody else from Knowle West? --BlackFlamingo 16:43, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
I am not only in Knowle West, I'm running through the hearts and minds of the populace as we speak. I still think it's carp, or at the least a little fishy. --C₂H₆O(hic) 11:32, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
If it's carp you are looking for you need Fishponds. If it's whores you need try Horfield which is obviously where I moved to when I got the chance. MrNFork you! 14:24, May 5
Not sure just asking! I can't decide on this one as I'm a asshole when it comes to enforcing freedom of speech so I'm asking you guys. Is this funny enough to warrant the pointless racism it also contains? Looking at this does not help the authors case that "some of my work mates are MOSTLY part Maoris, and they absolutely loved [this article]"... so you decide! MrNFork you! 10:22, May 2
Delete I just don't see it being funny of it's own accord. --C₂H₆O(hic) 10:32, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
Keep. The new version is subtler than the old one, as much as I like both of them, the new one edges it for me. I like the jarring transitions between very broken English and very fluent English, it works a bit better than the other version's way of presenting the fact it's a scam. --ChiefjusticeXBox 14:46, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
Much better than before. The subtlety makes it more original and enjoyable. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 20:12, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
Delete It's not funny, and is random. The humour in here consists of repeating memes. All Chuck Norris' base belong to Kanye West. Imagine that previous sentence 50 times. I wouldn't laugh either. --C₂H₆O(hic) 10:21, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
Delete It has been tagged a lacking images, but it's also just a fairly large list, and doesn't have many laughs. It would need a rewrite to make it worth keeping. --C₂H₆O(hic) 10:21, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. I don't feel that there is anything remarkably funny in here. --C₂H₆O(hic) 10:10, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Unsure. He's notable in his own way, but this article is irredeemable without complete rewrite. Consider this a delete vote that could be changed by a decent rewrite. (I may even be around to add a real vote at some stage.) SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM01:25 29 Apr
Hello, I'm the main author of Wumbo. If you are going to vote against it, please mention why. I am still trying to improve it (haven't abandoned it yet!). --Craw1 (talk) 21:38, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
Apologies Craw1, we obviously didn't realise you were working on it. I would advise you read our featured articles for some good examples of what passes for humour around here. You need more pictures and more coherent jokes, if possible. The main problem with this article in particular is that it is a non-existent subject which uses random humour, so as a reader it is difficult to care about anything the article is saying. You should ask yourself; why would someone want to read this? You have to keep them interested. Feel free to consult me if you want any more substantial help. --BlackFlamingo 23:12, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
I retract my vote for the moment. Craw1 wasn't finished with it. Let 'em work on it some more. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, May 1 '12 6:16 (UTC)
Kept The author is responding to messages and is tying to work on it. Let the dude work on it. MrNFork you! 10:31, May 2
Keep. Or I could move it to my namespace for further work. Änjelajs (talk) 18:10, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
Author wants to keep working on it, which is commendable. And Bildt is a former Prime Minister of Sweden, so of course he's notable. Unless all of Sweden is unnotable, which I can go along with. Aleister 20:52 30-4-'12
Delete. As someone who actually knows who this guy is and knows what he does, I can't safely say this is not funny. --OliOmniOmbudsman 21:34, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
I have no idea who he is. Assuming he is notable then the article is okay with a little effort. If he's not notable then the effort is probably not worth it. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM01:20 29 Apr
If he's not so well known it may be better to just mension him a little in an other article. Änjelajs (talk) 18:10, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
I moved this to ASCII because the name is more appropriate. By the way, this rules. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 01:01, April 25, 2012 (UTC)
Oh yeah, this is good. Thanks for sharing this. Instead of deleting, why not add good ones to it? Long ago I enjoyed the See also list at Spider, which has simple but interesting looking spider designs. Aleister 1:04 25-4-'12
I remember that this has been once before on the dangerzone we simply know as VFD. But that version wasn't as good as this. And it features a cat, so it must be good enough. Meow. OMG!!!It`s Cat the Colourful,Jesus Christ!!! 17:55 27 April 2012
I'm not going to vote "delete", but I'm on frosty's side, especially when you read this. Oliphaunte's points were all pretty much right-on. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 27 '12 0:52 (UTC)
See, like I said to SlyFox...leave it up to the Krauts and the Japs to come up with words for weird concepts... ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 25 '12 9:18 (UTC)
I wish people could write well about their cities. On a completely unrelated note, I'm going to re-write Denver, Colorado some day. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 25 '12 9:12 (UTC)
Not that bad, and since its on a userpage only I have no problem with it. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 22:02, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
Here ya go, Al. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 20 '12 2:27 (UTC)
Love in bloom. If we have one photo of George Bush (either one, take your pick) it's worst than this. All we need is love, doo doo doo doodoo. Aleister 00:11 20-4-'12
This is the true definition of "what not to do". Bandcruft, hitler, gay, fag, nazi, it's all covered in the first paragraph. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 22 '12 10:42 (UTC)
FJGGDHFGBFJGGJFGG??????? AGDFFHFVFHFHGFGGG!!!!!--fcukmanLOOS3R! 10:47, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
If an article can contain the words "sex," "Jesus," "Gay," "Nazi," and "Nyan cat" in the introduction alone and yet have nothing to do with any of those things, you know it sucks. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 13:22, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
Had this not been a real game, I would say "keep," because the concept is genious. However, this is a real game and all the author did was basically describe it while adding nothing of his own. Thus, I say "delete." --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 13:20, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
delete them all, except a couple. Aleister 1:20s 22-4-'12
not invloving money and projectng a society that is ha-hap-, how do you read this word dagnabbit, I ain't ever heard of hap-pin-ess, that must mean it's a terrorist, bomb him boys eheheheheheSirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM07:13 22 Apr
J00 eat? J00? Not did you. J00. J00 eat? --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 23:48, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
Oh for fuck's sake. --BlackFlamingo 23:49, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
So bad it's almost good, but something is missing. Delete them all, except a couple. Aleister 1:20s 22-4-'12
Delete, but willing to be convinced otherwise. There may be something worth salvaging, but I'm not that excited by the concept that I think it's worthwhile. Redirect to You as one of our earlier IC triumphs. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM01:07 22 Apr
You know what? I did like this at first (sort of), but Psyché really is infinitely better, and since "mind" really is synonymous with "psyche", I can't defend having two of these around when one kicks the other's ass. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 22 '12 5:15 (UTC)
I'm putting this comment here, just to fuck with Frosty's email account. Forgetting to uncheck "Email me every time a page I'm watching is changed", for the loss. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Apr 21 '12 11:08 (UTC)
Steel Railcats had a stadium capacity of 65,000 people, including Smurfs, but, by 1977, attendance had fallen to 13 hooligans, with two of them being British yobs paid to show up and throw eggs at the teamSirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM01:28 20 Apr
See, Jean Reno is French, so his first name is pronounced "Zhean", not "Gene"...and when you disrespect Jean Reno, you get ...uh... jaundice? Jeandiss? See, it kinda sorta sounds like "jaundice" when you say it...um...I guess two stoners came up with it while playing mad-libs and getting...uh, stoned? That's what stoners do, right? They play Mad Libs™ and get stoned? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 20 '12 2:16 (UTC)
H A G G E R ???????????? FIND WALDO TO CURE THE HGDFHDFHJDFHJFDH!!!!! --fcukmanLOOS3R! 12:43, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
Rape? Shock? It's a nice picture of a bunch of friends showering together, smiling and happy. The one guy is drying off the neck of another guy with a towel, and the male bonding between them is obviously joyful. The world needs more joy and drying off necks of friends with towels. What kind of minds do you people have? You all sicken me, get a room. This could be hung up in a kindergarten room as an example of friendship and commaderie. Aleister 00:22 20-4-'12
I'm assuming that this is a picture of Leon Trotsky with two fluffy kittens in his lap, which Pup takes issue with because he's a Commie hater. I don't know this for sure, because after the last two images, there's no fucking way I'm clicking on a third link. You were counting on that, weren't you, you sly fox-hound, you. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Apr 19 '12 14:34 (UTC)
In case anyone is wondering, it is a B&W image of a naked man wearing a scarf seemingly being attacked in a shower by several tough-men with their cock out. Delete this file, remove all links to it and then re-upload it and then delete it again. - ENTER CITADELT)alkC)untributionsB)an 15:12, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
Actually, it's not that bad, though it does depict rape, which is bad. Since it's unused and isn't funny, I'd say delete. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 20:48, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
Not all that shocking, but unfunny and unused. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 22:00, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
I like it. One of the best pages in uncyclopedia history.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 09:00, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
The "on wheels" articles are a significant part of the Uncyc story, coming from Willy on wheels over at Wikipedia. Just for that reason, I'd say keep. Shock porn definitely should be deleted at the File: itself, and external links to it removed. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM09:35 18 Apr
Keep Stupid page for stupid historical sake. But to me the real shock porn is the pic of the smiling George Bush. There is no porn in sex, imnho, I reserve that word for pics of people like Bush and for specific war and food images. Aleister 12:38 18-4-'12
Undoubtedly this has been done before, but really no offence to the "writers" of this but this is like the worst stuff on the site period. Other than being a hotspot for posting shock porn, crashing my browser and simply distracting certain users from being constructive it's plain and simple not funny. Wasting precious kilobytes of spaces also. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 08:12, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
If FkucMan, also-know'd-as Mister Ex, votes to keep this page, I almost have to vote "delete", in solidarity with Frosty. Almost. However, without this page, where will the vandalfaggots go to post vanity? 4chan? Encyclopedia Britannica? Heavens, they might use the goddamned Sandbox talk page! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 18 '12 9:25 (UTC)
This page is a sandbox except instead of editing tests it's for editing... failures.. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 10:48, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
This is page is completely unnecessary, yet, it is in a way a part of Uncyc history. I'll abstain for that reason. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 21:46, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
What an idiot! He started the "War on Terror" all on his own and achieved only the theft of oil reserves. He didn't even have congress permission for Iraq Gabriel Turner (talk) 18:23, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
Don't mind me. I'm just hopin' on the bandwagon. -- 01:33, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure my first vote carried enough ...eh... let's say "heft". So I'm voting again. Let's call 'em "Chicago Rules." ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 18 '12 6:00 (UTC)
Comments
This is the first time in the 2012 history of uncyclopedia that more than 5 people are voting for delete. cool.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 04:52, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
This no longer works for vector skin. I've edited it to not have any effect at all for now, but we probably shouldn't have this as an option anyway except for reskins, which are done differently. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM03:17 14 Apr
There's nothing to transclude there. What kind of template is that? -- This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 23:42, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
I should make this clear - the way this is set up works on monobook, but not very well (the size is wrong) and it doesn't work on Vector at all (except that it can put an ugly background behind part of the nav menu). This could probably be worked on to be able to change the background on vector skin with no major issue. To get this to work properly on both vector and monobook would take a lot more effort including screwing with the current skin (css and js files) - more than it's worth for the handful of pages currently using it. That, and the fact that we probably shouldn't have people able to play with the nav menu to the point where you could create a nav menu that looks fine but takes you to Conservapedia. Or the short version - It's ugly, doesn't work, and we probably shouldn't have it. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM06:04 15 Apr
Pure shit. And possible vanity... and this is after I removed a gigantic meme-filled list and the pictures of George Bush and Osama bin Ladin. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 22:25, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
Keep Not Garbage. "Step 5: Enter 'Roman Dog Bird is a nigger' into the edit box. Then insert the name of one of your sexier classmates and/or your most hated enemy.". Other parts are also worthy of salvation, and we need an article on this. MrNFork you! 15:18, Apr 14
Oh, Frosty, c'mon, it's not one of the world's greatest articles, but it's not just "buck buck buck". Read the links. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Apr 14 '12 14:33 (UTC)
Aint that bad.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 06:47, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
I just put Miley Spears into the Hall of Shame (kicking and screaming. on my part.) and was going to look at her "Preteen Slut" to see if it was feature worthy, and saw the VFD tag instead! Why not just revert it to Miley's last edit? I haven't looked at the history, and don't know if the IP's ravaged it or not. I hope they did, I would have. Aleister 10:57 13-4-'12
I was hoping "slut" had left the general vocabulary. Talk!Contribs! 07:44, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
Considering the stuff that is in my browser history and google searches over the past week ("hitler", "nazis", "doggy-style screenshots", "cockfighting", "nuclear bomb")...I'm pretty sure that if I visit this page, I'm-a get flagged by the Department of Homeland Security. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 13 '12 9:19 (UTC)
Comments
You did not make a good enough effort to find the best version in the page history before nomination, and people have voted based on what was not the best version so... Kept. If you still hate this article wait a while and try nominating it again. MrNFork you! 16:44, Apr 13
I think this is pretty bad but what do you guys think. --BlackFlamingo 13:48, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
That's not what I thought a cornhole was... --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 13:51, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
Blackie, I think it was written of fucktards, by fucktards, for fucktards. And we aren't fucktards here, are we? We're more...eh...unitards. We're equal-opportunity idiots. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Apr 9 '12 13:52 (UTC)
I started to remove the templates and fix the infobox, and then I realized that there was no content in this tissue of ineptitude. I wouldn't wipe my ass with this article. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Apr 9 '12 14:06 (UTC)
I'm honestly a li'l "meh" about it, myself, so I shall register my disapprobation, the votes shall be far short of a "delete", and the article shall be kept. Next! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Apr 9 '12 8:46 (UTC)
It's not great, but it's not that bad. Cut out the Mexican jokes, the 2nd image (unrelated), the 3rd image (UN:CM), and you have an okay stub. Add in MrN's welding puns, slap on a {{fix}}, and it'll fuse into an okay stub. Ore have I got that wrong? After all, this site is in a constant state of flux, so some bright spark should be able to fix this. Stopping now SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM06:55 07 Apr
This is okay. --BlackFlamingo 13:54, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
This article looks like my welds: a bunch of bird shit. No seriously. That's what my welds look like. Of course, it's not really my fault; I just don't have a MIG welder. MAN I wish I had a MIG welder. Or a TIG welder. Jesus, I'd take a wire-feed welder. Arc welders suck. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Apr 9 '12 4:38 (UTC)
Wouldn't you rather have people read an article and say to themselves, "Wow that was funny!" rather than, "Well that wasn't that bad." However, on a related note, I really can't see anyone looking at this and saying, "Well that wasn't that bad." much less "Wow that was funny!" -- 01:10, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
Sheena Easton
The Window
Abstain. Ugly but redeemable. 
Delete. --
Keep. 
Odd one. I am trying to determine if this, or 
Fork you! 17:34, Apr 14
For.--
