This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
I see no difference between this and the crap I nommed on VFD all that time ago. Can it stay dead this time? ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 06:46, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
That's just like David Cameroon's policy of fighting to steal, as used in Libya with the oil reserves. Gabriel Turner (talk) 13:11, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (4)
Disambiguation page with only one functioning link, it should redirect to Conan O'Brien I guess. Mattsnow 09:48, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
Seriously, why delete it? Wouldn't it be better to just redirect it instead? Gabriel Turner (talk) 11:28, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
To remove the content of a page and change to a redirect is the same as a deletion, and needs a VFD vote to do. The "delete" votes here are asking to do exactly that. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM11:54 09 Apr
I assume this listing is a response to last night's vandalism by Anon, which I have reverted. Like all pages on NBA players, especially uniquely talent-challenged ones, the page attracts fancruft and deserves autoconfirmed protection. Spıke¬ 10:47 7-Apr-12
Actually, that brought it to my attention. I looked through the history and found nothing really redeemable. Autoconfirmed will stop it being vandalised, but as it is it's still sub-par. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM11:24 07 Apr
I can live with either result of the vote. However, if deleted, I think it will come back, and it will not be better. Spıke¬ 23:20 7-Apr-12
Bizzeebeever seems to have taken custody of it. Spıke¬ 22:06 8-Apr-12
Delete As a rule it's sometime possible to add {{fix|list}} to this kinda article, but I'm not sure it's possible to score with this one. MrNFork you! 19:03, Apr 5
0.1 Yugoslavia jokes, 0.2 football (go fuck yourselves) jokes, 0.5 random humour, the rest is a void of boredom and pointlessness. Talk!Contribs! 13:33, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
Delete Never really improved after the ICU was removed, and I'm probably huff this outright, but I figured I would bring it here instead. MrNFork you! 19:03, Apr 5
I just brought this up on Mr-ex777's talk page. I tried to be nice, but it's pretty awful. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 21:55, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
Isn't this some video game thing from the 1990's? mAttlobster. (hello) 10:39, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
It needs an editor badly, there's far too much rubbish in this one that distracts from what the article is supposed to be. I'd agree with POTR's suggestion. --ChiefjusticePSX 14:05, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
Delete the whole article then. The rendundant one is not really funny.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 14:06, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. I think what Mr-ex is trying to do has some potential, but he has to change his approach completely. A much better approach, in my opinion, would be to write the article from the point of view of the kind of weird, crazy Pokémon fan he's mocking in the current article. I think we did something similar for Michael Jackson. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM23:24, 3 April 2012
Why does this deserved to be huffed? at least it's better than the original one.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 10:43, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
I sort of think that the original one might have been better. It had an entertaining concept even if it wasn't executed perfectly. This, on the other hand, just sounds like a rant. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 13:02, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
The first block of text is just bad. The japanese thing stands for "Penis' hole". Ain't that funny? and rants are funnier than rendundancy. Also, the original version has been VFD' once.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 13:05, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
Look, I'm not saying that the original version is perfect, but pokemon is redundant, so being redundant is appropriate in this instance. That version was clever. Saying things like "TEH POKEMANS IS GHEY,GHEY,GHEY!!!111!1111!!!" isn't original and isn't funny. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 13:15, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
That was purposed to give sacrasm against those crazy fantards, in fact, they are really like that.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 13:40, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
I know, which is why it isn't funny. If lots of people say something, writing down the same thing to mock them doesn't work. Had an IP or a red link user/N00b done this, it would have been assumed to be vandalism and would be reverted immediately. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 13:50, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
I forgot this is the fifth gen. there is more than platinum.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 13:56, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
Reverted and Sysop Protected. This is not really what VFD is for, rant, random comments about procedure, etc, don't do it again (unless you do) MrNFork you! 19:43, Apr 5
Why this is not in QVFD? It's made in april 4 2012.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 05:34, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
? Shouldn't this be automatically have been erased on the spot already? -- UserTalkContributions 05:36, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
Yes. All very fair points. I'm going through a list of articles to possibly nominate and clearly messed up here by not noticing that this was new. My bad. MrNFork you! 05:49, Apr 5
Damn ye MrN, I vote save which means I have to work on it, although later, later. There's lots of good jokes here (and by here I mean on this VFD entry), and maybe Puppy can join in this save (actually, it shouldn't be too hard). Pics should be findable if the dumpster's not locked. MrN! Aleister 13:21 3-4-'12
Keep Aleister is doing this maliciously you understand. MrNFork you! 18:17, Apr 3
I dunno. For a town cruft it's not as badly written as some others. I'd give it a {{Fix}} and see if it gets any takers in the next 30 days. And then kill it if unimproved. If I'm outvoted though - which isn't wholly unlikely - then stick in it my space, as I may be able to use bits of it for a later project. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM01:10 03 Apr
I thought about fixing it myself, but figured there was not enough there for it to be worth it. MrNFork you! 15:49, Apr 3
To get the VFD que rolling again, here's an abysmal article found by mashing the random page button, a task easier said than done with the old skin. Talk!Contribs! 07:17, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
Against. Dali would have torn the site apart with his bare hands if he had seen this, and then he would have painted himself doing it. Aleister 1:48 3-4-'12
Delete Nice one Max, but I don't think this one stands on it's own, and we have the main article, but I can't see any of those quotes being good in that article. :) MrNFork you! 02:56, Apr 3
Comments
Comment. I created this page when I cleaned up the main Borat Sagdiyev article. All I did was move the overly long quotes section to the Unquotable namespace. I can delete it if it's that bad. MadMax (talk) 18:22, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
It's just that as far as I know all of these are from the movie. Given how people love to quote this movie it makes them stale jokes, and unoriginal. Somebody may decide this is funny, or worth saving, but I'm not a fan of articles that are based upon existing comedies with no new material. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM12:50 02 Apr
That's fine. I'm not contesting the nomination. I only meant you could have put it on QVFD or used {{fix}} (if someone were interested in rewriting it). MadMax (talk) 01:36, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
Hell no! Probably one of the most vital of vital vitals (even if Wikipedia haven't got it in the top 100). It has suffered a lot of article rot over time, but even just going back half a dozen edits it's much better. And being a vital it didn't show at UN:FIX. But this sucker still needs fixing, but definitely not deletion. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM07:59 01 Apr
Keep. Major topic. The fix tag has been altered which is giving rise to these nominations (I.E. They should be nominated for VFD as opposed to cleanup or re-write).--Sycamore(Talk) 10:17, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
Vital. The base of many articles.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 11:14, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
There's been a {{fix}} at the top of this for a good month now, and little has been done to improve it, so I guess it's fair game. ~jcm 20:18, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
Reverted back to a redirect. When the actual content of an article takes up less space than the two (or three) templates on it (i.e. it's only a couple lines long), feel free to use QVFD. Except if it's an in-joke, of course. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM12:16, 2 April 2012
Fuck all you guys. It's shit. Shitty-shit-shit. Shit-faced shit. Talk!Contribs! 07:43, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
This is truly terrible, and is vastly different from the seven-year-old featured version, which in itself is crap. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 1 '12 8:01 (UTC)
Smiths comment - The poopsmith lounge was made to discuss this kind of nomination - which is considerably more sensible than nominations that will be archived (like this one) by default. Perhaps in future discussions either at the lounge or on my talk page could resolve such confusions on VFD and prevent time wasted on such nominations.--Sycamore(Talk) 10:14, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps re-opening it would be an idea.--Sycamore(Talk) 11:58, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure. ZB would be the person to talk to on that score, but I seem to recall that it was opened primarily due to VFD having excessive entries. Not really the case now. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM12:10 01 Apr
Going through our NFL articles I don't think this one can be fixed. MrNFork you! 13:42, Mar 28
Will change my vote if Aleister fixes it up. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 18:52, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
Hey, it was fixed up. I'm losing what little talent I had, losing it man!!! Al 19:21 28-3
Sorry, I just don't understand what the joke is here. I think it could use a little more work, but it's definitely better than the way it was before. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 20:02, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
I don't understand the joke either! But he's Brian Urlacher, so he won't go down without a fight. Ok, I'll add some more, I'll just go crazy and add crazy stuff! hehehehehehehe here I come, get out of my way, I'm going to spread the crazy on the page like peanut on butter!!! Aleister 21:17 28-3-'12
This was at one time a disambiguation page. It is again. Please remove cyberbullying when you find it. Recommend protection level auto confirmed to reduce article rot. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM10:59 28 Mar
Cyberbullying is currently gone, it is now a disambiguation page. Per Puppy, protect and keep the article. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 07:28, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Per above.--Sycamore(Talk) 10:18, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Per Romartus. I would rather have a red link encouraging a new article. That's a pants pointless not that funny list. It's not a useful disambiguation page IMO. MrNFork you! 01:56, Apr 1
Comments
with a lot of work, this article could work... but for the most part of it, it seems like short lines that should be a trivia part of the article rather then a whole article. Delete it tho if it doesn't get ALOT added to it.---Maniac1075Complain Here 12:52, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
Use the {{VFD}} template, people. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Mar 30 '12 19:22 (UTC)
Er, when an IP removes the VFD template, make sure to REVERT, people. As you were. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Mar 30 '12 19:24 (UTC)
it's not that bad, but far from funny at the same time. If it took the piss out of something in a funny way, then ok, but it seems too much like a pissed off member flaming the place.. potential for a decent re-write, but i'm fucked if I'm doing it! ---Maniac1075Complain Here 13:07, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
If kept, this article is likely to eventually die anyway from a fix tag. Too many redlinks, and poor formatting. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 07:34, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
not the worst thing I have read, and could do with some inspirational story about Hollywood making a movie out of him for his bravery... but I can't be bothered writing it, and you can't be bothered writing, no one can be bothered writing it, so delete it.---Maniac1075Complain Here 12:56, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
Lol what the hell nfl even is lol i think its some made up thing omg nfl does not even exist and so should not this article OMG!!!It`s Cat the Colourful,Jesus Christ!!! 19:20 31 March 2012
Comments
Ok, the attempt at humor here...is playing "opposites." Ryan Leaf was a superlatively over-hyped American college football quarterback who went to the NFL...and bombed spectacularly, horrifically, in a manner that was laugh-out-loud hilarious to anyone but fans of the team that drafted him. True things that the article makes no attempt to exploit: Leaf was a type-A douchebag who tended to blame his teammates for his poor performances (wikipedia); got into physical altercations with reporters, fans, and his own teammates; and years after leaving the NFL, was arrested for committing a burglary involving controlled substances -- arrested by U.S. customs agents, while re-entering the U.S. after leaving a Vancouver drug rehab program. And then there's the brain tumor. I ask you: how could someone fail so miserably at parodying this? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 28 '12 19:12 (UTC)
Response It is kinda hard to make jokes about cancer tastefully. But having said that, what would it take for you to bulldoze and rebuild, given your knowledge of topic? SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM09:44 29 Mar
Oh, no, it wasn't cancer. Benign tumor. As for bulldozing it and rebuilding the article...I've tried that with a couple of articles on VFD recently (Fighter aircraft for one) and my sense of "funny" just isn't working right now. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Mar 29 '12 21:47 (UTC)
They're on VFD already, so nothing to lose, and best thing to do when hitting that block is keep going. I actually was at one of those blocks with HowTo:Be Happy (hence it's so much darker than most of my stuff) but polish and feedback helped me get it over the line. (I realised later that I'd recycled a few old jokes as well, but it worked as part of the new.) The alternative is to let the block beat you, which is a bad idea. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM11:02 29 Mar
It's been going on for about four months, here. I think it's already won. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Mar 30 '12 19:28 (UTC)
Basically, this is a list which takes some meme or celebrity and then says that they should be arrested for some reason that either makes no sense or is a joke that's been used about 500 million times. Either way, it's not funny. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 15:33, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
This might be a better version. MadMax (talk) 18:47, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
At least Chuck norris and oscar wilde aren't here.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 11:12, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
Kept Apparently UN:N, also RV back to version recommended by Max. If you still hate this maybe try nominating again sometime later. MrNFork you! 16:01, Mar 26
Seems OK at first glance. Redirect to "Cocaine". Then redirect "Coke" to "Coca-Cola. That should do it. I'll go over "Cocaine" and snort some life into it. Aleister 20:51 21-3-'12
Keep This should not really be here... it is a {{Merge}} job - after which it should either be a redirect to coca-cola or vice versa.--Sycamore(Talk) 21:36, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Either disambig or Frog Semen seems fine to me. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 21:33 (UTC)
Comments
Pup turned this article into a redirect to Frog Semen, but I'm told that's not proper, so I figured "let's have a vote!" Crummy article is crummy, but I'm abstaining for the moment. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 18:08 (UTC)
Merge or disperse the keepable content to the relevant article(s) and change this into a disambiguation page to whatever coke-related articles we have around here. Wasn't sure where to put this 'vote'. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM14:27, 23 March 2012
Not bad and well illustrated. I like anything that tells the Larry Sanger story. This could be improved, with maybe more cowbell, and I'll put in a few dozen months on it. Aleister 9:47 21-3-'12
Keep. Maybe you could help this new contributer with their first article - as opposed to nominating their first efforts on VFD. I hope this nomination is well remembered when anyone in the delete camp here brings or contributes to forums on user retention or site activity.--Sycamore(Talk) 21:34, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
The author of this will not come back as he was banned for stirring up a shit storm. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:45, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
Some potential I feel, not so keen to chuck it out. Needs a fix tag/userspacing though. --ChiefjusticePSX 22:22, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
Delete I don't see the funny. MrNFork you! 02:05, Mar 25
Comments
Invalid nomination. This article is only 3 days old, or some such? Should be on ICU, and deleted at the discretion of an admin. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 10:37 (UTC)
Invalid!! No validity!! What would be the reason for an ICU? Aleister 10:42 (ICU)
It's lame, and lacks Funny. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 10:51 (UTC)
It's a llama and Funnybony isn't working on it? Possibly true, but life isn't all llamas you know. Aleister 10:53 21-3-'12
The fat man walks alone at midnight. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 10:55 (UTC)
I this had gone on to ICU, then it would (99% chance) have gone through to an admin without change, as the original author is banned. Then it would have likely been deleted. Then the original author would never have come back - etc. Here is an opportunity to salvage the article (which I see little salvageable about it myself) rather than this vanishing before you have had a chance to read it. Putting this here means that the community has had the chance to decide it's fate. In short, it's a hell of a lot nicer for a n00b to have this happen then the alternative. While you are being critical of this having a chance to be saved via VFD, have a quick look at Uncyclopedia:Articles to fix, which seems to still be being ignored, or Category:ICU for the 500+ articles that are currently slated for demise. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM10:03 25 Mar
I didn't find anything here amusing at all. It seems to be a load of dribble and hard attempts at humor that do not work. It surprises me it has not been VFD since its original incarnation in 2005.---Maniac1075Complain Here 10:54, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Yes, quite terrible. However, I bet a Street Fighter fan votes "keep". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 11:03 (UTC)
Maniac is, among other things, our wrestling expert around here. I don't know who Zanfief is. Aleister 11:08 21-3-'12
I put the fix tag on it. Now that I think about it, I should have VFD'd it on the spot. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 20:21, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Per BB I want to vote for it as a keep, but also he's right. I might have another look at it though and see if clean-up is possible. So if it's deleted could a copy be added to my userspace? SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM12:02 21 Mar
@Aleister Analstar; Zangief is a character from the video game Street Fighter II, and the bazillion sequels that followed. About the only thing that was almost funny was the part about the Japanese (creators) making his moves so hard to do as a result of the cold war with Russia. Zangief is a Russian wrestler, who bares scars all over his body, because his back-story is he supposedly wrestled bears. To execute one of his moves, called the spinning pile-driver, where Zangief grabs an opponent in a pile driver, then spins 360/720/8whatever through the air, then drops them on their head. To do that move, you had to rotate the joystick/control pad directions in a 360 spin from left to left, or right to right, then hit a punch button. It was considered to be the hardest move to pull off in Street Fighter II. Therefor, Zangief was not a popular player to play as. Plus, he was pretty slow, and his chest hair reminded me of your moms bum that hasn't been shaved in years, so it's understandable his character probably should have had a leather cop suit on to let people know his character was pretty gay and you shouldn't bother to use him. So if someone is going to attempt to re-write it, that part is about the moves being so hard to do is about the only thing from the article that could remain and improved on... alot....a hell of a lot. It isn't funny the way it is, but someone could re-write it funnier I think.---Maniac1075Complain Here 04:40, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
Keep. It's supposed to have list, plus it's super duper great and funny. -- UserTalkContributions 16:30, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, I went at random and smiled several times. Looks like what it's about. Not a bad page, just listy, but hey, annoying. Aleister 16:32 (UTC)
Keep. It's not a very stellar page, but if you deleted 90% of the lists, the rest of it would still be an acceptable enough article in my not-so-honest opinion. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM16:39, 17 March 2012
Deleting the lead picture of a VFH candidate seems extremely weird to me. It seems like this would be better handled with a suggestion to the author to replace that picture, possibly by suggesting a suitable alternative. pillow talk 20:56, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
He wouldn't replace the original (same base image, but with just veins and some cum drawn on) when I suggested that. I'd find it to link it, but I'm at work. 1234~ 21:51, 16 March 2012
Wait, sorry; I mixed that up. Although I'm pretty sure someone already did on the nompage anyway, but I'll mention it again, I guess. 1234~ 22:25, 16 March 2012
I don't... really... understand what you're saying. pillow talk 23:33, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
Or that he put at least another pic on the page, a less penisy one, which can be used on the main page if it's featured. But it's perfect for the article itself. I can never play Playstation 3 again. Aleister 21:05 Ides of March Boxing Day '12
Cool delete reasons bro. This isn't porn, nor is it not funny. Bringing this to VFD is political and a waste of time. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:55, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
If it was an actual photo of a penis, I might reconsider, but it's just a crude drawing, and obviously nothing sexual. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 14:41, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (5)
Just too much, and isn't doing the article any favours either since with it the entire joke is very obviously out there even before one reads the thing. Also not a good lead image in general. 1234~ 19:46, 16 March 2012
If it were more like a penis, or less like a penis, I would say it stays. But somehow you've managed to hit the Uncanny Valley of dicks. I thought I could go my entire life without typing that sentence, but apparently not. Seriously, Reefer Desk this thing. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 21:53 Mar 16, 2012
Comment. I'm extremely biased against images with anything even resembling a penis in them. But if TKF and others consider it a vital part of the article, I guess I'll live. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM21:57, 16 March 2012
Hahahaha! Two admins enter, only one leaves! I'm-a sit back over here in the corner and not vote, and when a victor emerges with their opponent's severed head, I'm-a prostrate myself before them and vow undying fealty. See? Lookit me, Mr. I'm-So-Cool-and-Uninvolved-in-the-Current-Drama. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Mar 17 '12 12:48 (UTC)
Delete Well there is a player called Zinedine Zidane and another called Ronaldo. But I still don't know what this is all about. MrNFork you! 23:28, Mar 16
Conan
QVFD redundant. 
Fixed, apparently. 
Comment. I think what Mr-ex is trying to do has some potential, but he has to change his approach completely. A much better approach, in my opinion, would be to write the article from the point of view of the kind of weird, crazy Pokémon fan he's mocking in the current article. I think we did something similar for 
Against. Dali would have torn the site apart with his bare hands if he had seen this, and then he would have painted himself doing it. 
Obliterate. Jesus. This is bad. This is very, very bad. - 
At least Chuck norris and oscar wilde aren't here.--
Merge or disperse the keepable content to the relevant article(s) and change this into a disambiguation page to whatever coke-related articles we have around here. Wasn't sure where to put this 'vote'. 
Shit indeed.
1337CRUFT
