## Worst 100 Porn Movies of All Time

Score: 4
Keep (1)
1. First! This page is a chick, ah, IP, magnet, and gives them a playground so they don't bother us. The page doesn't mention The Beatles classic fourth movie, "Cum together, right now, over me". Aleister 13:48 17-2-'12
• Yeah, "IP flypaper". Still, why do we want that? ~ BB ~ (T) Fri, Feb 17 '12 13:57 (UTC)
• It's humorous at times, and if some good users go through it and add and subtract, this could be a very funny page. Colonization. If it's huffed imagine how many old versions and interesting titles will be lost forever. Childess at times, and stupid often, every once in awhile a gem will pop up. ("That's right," said Gem). Aleister 12:53 18-2-'12
Delete (5)
1. This will not get deleted. I guarantee this will not get deleted. However...it's an unfunny list which sucks ass. So I thought I'd give it a...shot. (Also, they left off Money Shot: The Movie, starring Donald and Ivana Hump. Best line: "It's gonna be HUUUUUGE!")

Seacrest Out.  ~ BB ~ (T) Fri, Feb 17 '12 13:43 (UTC)
2. I cleaned up Worst 100 Movies of All Time a while ago, but you can still see the crappiness go up towards the end. Just kill this one to even the balance. 09:02, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
3. nuns gone wild shouldn't be on this list. Pup 09:25 18 Feb '12
4. --Gamma 21:07, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
5. Delete mAttlobster. (hello) 16:51, February 19, 2012 (UTC)

## Template:Xeyes

Score: 5
Keep (0)

Delete (5)
1. This template is used on three pages, one of which is black, one of which is in userspace, and one of which is an archive of spam. May we delete this (and subst the userspace usage) so I can move my xeyes template to its proper title? 07:02, 19 February 2012
2. It has more usage than it's proposed replacement, but it has no real purpose. Pup 07:42 19 Feb '12
3. Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:36, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
4. Rape this template and leave it for dead in the desert. ~ BB ~ (T) Sun, Feb 19 '12 9:46 (UTC)
5. 16:52, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

## Alien vs Grue

Score: 6
Keep (0)

Delete (6)
2. There are very few places grues belong. This isn't one of them. Pup 03:01 18 Feb '12
3. -Vomits- --Gamma 20:39, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
4. gay ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:11, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
5. I will not be buying tickets or even pirating this movie. Sir Georgie Harangue Mediocracy 22:47, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
6. 16:52, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
• On first glance I read this "Aliens vs Glue". Now that's a page worth reading! Aleister 16:18 18-2-'12
• LOL!!! Ha, sticky! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:34, February 19, 2012 (UTC)

## Sheraton Wall Centre Hotel

Score: 4
Keep (0)

Delete (4)
1. Takin' out the trash...  ~ BB ~ (T) Fri, Feb 17 '12 14:23 (UTC)
2. Awful -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:37, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
3. I have cancelled my reservation.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:38, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
4. Horrible. Sir Georgie Harangue Mediocracy 22:42, February 19, 2012 (UTC)

## Central Korean Republic

Score: 6
Keep (0)

Delete (6)
1. Good God. Mine Eyes Have Seen the Blasphemy of the Cumming of the Devil.  ~ BB ~ (T) Fri, Feb 17 '12 14:07 (UTC)
2. Delete. It's not that bad. Still bad though.--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:30, February 17, 2012 (UTC)
3. In the words of everyone's favorite engineer, "nope..." --Gamma 03:12, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
4. Too bland. Sir Georgie Harangue Mediocracy 22:49, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
5. I can see the joins. Doesn't work. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:05, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
6. what the fuck is this?????? --fcukmanLOOS3R! 09:48, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

## G4-TechTV War

Score: 5
Keep (0)

Delete (5)
1. Nobody cares. Nobody cares. Nobody cares. Nobody cares. Nobody cares. Nobody cares.  ~ BB ~ (T) Thu, Feb 16 '12 10:01 (UTC)
2. NRV Pup 10:53 16 Feb '12
3. Per Above. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 16:06, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
4. This is Badness. This is SPARTA! -- 21:19, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
5. Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 13:07, February 18, 2012 (UTC)

## Game:Grueslayer Abridged

Score: 5
Keep (0)

Delete (5)
1. Per the dozen people voting to delete the, in comparison, significantly better original. 16:53, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
2. Seriously, that's it? -- 21:36, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
3. of course. Pup 11:06 16 Feb '12
4. Single lame, tired joke. Doesn't really offend me, but...eh. Doesn't make me laugh. Can't be improved. UN:N. ~ BB ~ (T) Sat, Feb 18 '12 7:46 (UTC)
5. Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:47, February 18, 2012 (UTC)

## Game:Grueslayer

Score: 5
Keep (3)
1. Keep Call me a loser, but I actually find these games enjoyable. Keep it and touch it up a bit.--  03:51, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
2. How do the newfags know how grues were born?--fcukmanLOOS3R! 04:56, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
3. I agree with IWKY333. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:31, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (8)
1. Pointless. Unlike Zork, which is a parody of a real-life computer game, this is just pure randomness. It represents everything wrong with the game namespace in it's current form. Now I know some moron is going to come in and say "DUHH BUT DIS GAEM IZ WELL MADE!!1", I'd like to say that just because it is large and expansive, a piece of shit is still a piece of shit.- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an
2. This game is on my list of Games to rewrite almost totally as it's predominantly an unfunny and annoyingly bad Zork clone, but the size actually meant that each time I've looked at it I've baulked. I'd prefer to scrap it instead. Pup 12:11 16 Feb '12
3. Oh <insert deity here>, not another one. Seriously, why doesn't someone make a new wiki for all of these games? --Ovidius IV 06:02, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
4. There is a god... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:20, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
5. Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! ~ BB ~ (T) Thu, Feb 16 '12 6:29 (UTC)
6. Delete. Whiskered meme. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:03, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
7. Here's [list of subpages.] I think there's like a million *swallows crack*. 08:26, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
8. It's basically the same concept as Zork, only it isn't funny. -- 11:28, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
• If this doesnt make the cut can it be moved to my user space? Pretty please? *puppy dog face*--  07:09, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
• Also we should get Game:Grueslayer Abridged. It combines the stupidity of Grueslayer with the pointlessness of stubs. 08:26, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
• The game, by judging from the talk page, is apparently unfinished. However, the two users who have spearheaded the project have long been inactive and it seems unlikely to face improvement. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 11:18, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

## HowTo:Survive a Horror Movie • H • T • Add Oldvfd • Deletion Survivor •

Score: -1
Keep (1)
1. It's not exactly a feature grade transformation (shut up, Mr Smug!) but I suppose it works as a place holder to stop the page being recreated as something similarly bad. It is a pretty IP-attracting topic, after all. 11:09, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
• [twirls mustache] Ha-ha! Made you touch an article covered with poo! Now your hands are all poo-ey! Ha-ha! [runs away into the night] ⇒Snidely P. Smug (t) 13:36, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (0)
1. Another crummy list. If anyone wants to revert it to this, knock yourself out. But even that's still lame.  ~ BB ~ (T) Fri, Feb 17 '12 13:52 (UTC)
• You know, I think the new version is kinda thin, but I'm willing to wait and see if Epic adds to it. ~ BB ~ (T) Sat, Feb 18 '12 14:38 (UTC)

## Owlient

Score: 4
Keep (0)

Delete (4)
1. This is-a bad.  ~ BB ~ (T) Thu, Feb 16 '12 3:34 (UTC)
2. Uhhhhhhhh I am at a lost of words right now. Just, delete right now.--  04:06, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
3. Ow, my head. --Ovidius IV 06:08, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
4. Polls, lists, lack of pictures, lack of humor. A perfect example of a bad article. -- 11:31, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
• Comment. So it's a real company involved in the game business and horse breeding(!} - very French. In this morass (another French word) there is possibly an article that can be extracted. Any volunteers? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:57, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
• No. Also, to be accurate, morass isn't directly from French, it's from the the Dutch moeras, which itself was derived from the Old French marais, which itself is of Frankish origins. Ah, Google. ~ BB ~ (T) Thu, Feb 16 '12 7:24 (UTC)

## Attack Attack!

Score: 6
Keep (0)

Delete (6)
1. THIS <insert_entity_here/> SUCKS! RAAAAAARGGGGGH!  ~ BB ~ (T) Thu, Feb 16 '12 3:29 (UTC)
2. Delete Delete I just read two sentences and I'm already hating this article, so I'm not even going to bother reading the rest of this crap.--  04:03, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
3. Delete. No further comment necessary. --Ovidius IV 06:06, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
4. Great. Now I got vomit all over my clean shirt. 08:18, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
5. NRV Pup 10:55 16 Feb '12
6. That gif is pretty funny though. -- 11:30, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

## Wumbo

Score: 7
Keep (0)

Delete (7)
1. Delete What the hell is this?? MrN  Fork you! 23:45, Feb 15
2. It rubs me the wrong way. I don't know why, so I'm prej. Aleister 3:24 16-2-'12
3. This was so bad, I'm not even going to bother posting a wity comment. In other words: --  04:48, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
4. Crappy content, shitty formatting, overuse of lists, and going against the very spirit of Wumbo. Delete with extreme prejudice. --Ovidius IV 06:04, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
5. Worst article ever.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 06:05, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
6. Wuh? 08:17, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
7. Wumbo! -- 11:28, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
8. In math, wumbo is equal to the square root of Norris. Becuase Norris is a variable (you never know when he will strike), the proper equation to determine wumbo is (Norris^2-3X)/(The Value of the Canadian Dollar+60,000X). Once wumbo is determined, the user must strap down to their chair and prepare for lift off. If they keep their hands inside the vehicle at all times, they're actually allowed to solve the problem without the use of their hands or feet. Neato, eh? Also, Wumbo is the 809th digit of pi according to Pokémon. Wumbo is also a variable used to describe the angular velocity of an object in three dimensional space, or four dimensional space-time.
I believe that this is possibly the worst paragraph that has ever been in any article on Uncyclopedia. There is so much wrong with it I am having trouble wrapping my head around how horrifically bad this is. Mr-ex777 is right. This is the The Worst article ever. Pup 12:23 16 Feb '12

## Rape • H • T • Add Oldvfd • Deletion Survivor •

Score: -6
Keep (8)
1. Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:16, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
2. NO FUCK YOU--fcukmanLOOS3R! 09:57, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
3. "Also, apparently Wikia has gotten some complaints" is code for "Wikia asked me to nominate this for deletion." Satire is satire, censorship is not. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 10:27, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
No, I nominated it because it wasn't funny, nor was it satire; sannse won't even talk to me. But this still isn't funny, or satire; now it's just random, and there's nothing stopping us from redirecting it to one of the better articles Aleister linked pending colonisation. 17:49, 15 February 2012
For the record, sannse asked me to nominate this for deletion. She also suggested that we should start a community wide discussion on what is acceptable content on Uncyclopedia. I declined, but passed it along to Lyrithya. -- 17:59, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
4. Keep MrN  Fork you! 12:16, Feb 15
5. Keep. The current state of the article is the cleanest, and probably the least offensive, that it's ever been (look at diffs from 2010!). If we delete it and don't protect it, something worse will be there in a month. If we delete it and full-protect it, we're setting an ugly precedent of censorship. Improve it, yes; rewrite it, sure; but I can't see what purpose deletion would serve. 16:31, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
6. This was recently rewritten by some of our best writers. It is over the top to the point of being absurd. The article gives tips on how to get raped. I don't understand how people can take that seriously. -- 17:51, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
7. Maybe, maybe it could use a bit of cleaning up - there are a few segments I think are just padding - but overall I find this too clever to kerkill.  Sir Skullthumper, MD  18:51 Feb 15, 2012
8. It's mediocre, not deletion worthy, and personally, I don't believe it's anymore offensive than some of the other stuff on here. -- 22:01, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)
1. This is not funny. It has some comments that could become articles of their own if expanded, but the whole of this seems to be nothing more than an attempt to be as offensive as possible, and while offensiveness can work for an article, there needs to be more than just that, an actual angle to justify it. Being offensive for the sake of being offensive is about as funny as mentioning Chuck Norris as many times as possible for the sake of mentioning Chuck Norris as many times as possble, but unlike mentioning Chuck Norris, which is just dumb, offending people for no good reason serves to actively damage the site, in external reputation and internal atmosphere, which this article has already. 07:54, 15 February 2012
2. rape me, my friend --Roman Dog Bird 08:07, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
Pup 09:26 15 Feb '12
• Also, apparently Wikia has gotten some complaints about this article. Now I love giving Wikia grief more than... well, possibly anyone here who ain't banned, but this really isn't exactly the sort of grief that's at all productive in any direction, nor that's worth giving. It just makes us look bad, is what it does. 08:06, 15 February 2012
• Possibly a tone down or removal of some of the stupidier stuff might help. Like racism, rape is one of those subjects where getting the tone right and at least finding a humorous angle is fiendishly difficult to achieve. In this instance, I would prefer that there is something here as it is likely a far nastier article will be popped into the space. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:14, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
• Actually, I agree with Lyrithya in that there is no comedic concept here. Failing that it becomes a line of bad jokes and no comedic value. I couldn't come up with a concept any better though. Given the nature of it, I think if we do delete in the end, we should also protect the page against re-creation to avoid what Romartus is talking about. Pup 09:26 15 Feb '12
• A rape feature, Tittyfuck rape exists, and things like White van and the Bill Clinton-concept HowTo:Become A Rapist, but this one actually had a phone number in it which I edited out about a half hour ago, so it's not really been watched very well. Colonization (lol)? Aleister 11:13 15-2-'12
• Do you honestly believe that there's such a thing as bad press to a struggling, volunteer satire website? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:01, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
• Well, I saw an Argentine newspaper article that said we fuck children and eat babies, and sometimes fuck babies while eating children. The article included a video, purportedly showing an Uncyclopedia editor spinning a baby on his dick while playing basketball with a dog as the ball. It was all pixelated and censorized, so I couldn't tell if that was actually what was happening...but, I mean, that would be bad pub, right? ~ BB ~ (T) Thu, Feb 16 '12 1:30 (UTC)
• Reluctant Abstain. Sometimes humour is difficult to find in some areas - and often the glib tone to make up for this problem in such articles is more awkward than funny. Sadly the article is comparable to others of its type and we don't do censorship (especially at the behest of random people moaning at our host).--(Talk 11:48, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
• Reluctantly removing vote. If we remove the lede quote and the reference to surprise sex in the first paragraph it'd remove a fair bit of the sting from the article. Also swapping the sections on How to rape and How to be raped would improve it. Pup 11:56 16 Feb '12

• Pretty overwhelmingly kept -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:09, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

## The Really Big Button That Doesn't Do Anything • H • T • Add Oldvfd • Deletion Survivor •

Score: 1
Keep (1)
1. Dramatically changed, or was it? Still completely pointless. Does it need to have a point? Pup 11:39 15 Feb '12
Delete (2)
1. Rather pointless.--  06:21, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
2. What the hell? -- 20:26, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
1. Passable, even if not brilliant. Needs a little spring clean is all. Pup 09:17 15 Feb '12

• Kept PuppyOnTheRadio did a total overhaul so the page IWKY and Xam voted is totally changed now. Also apparently UN:N anyway. MrN  Fork you! 23:58, Feb 15

## The Phantom Fetus • H • T • Add Oldvfd • Deletion Survivor •

Score: -1
Keep (4)
1. Keep. Passable quality. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:24, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
2. Keep. I finally read it, and it's very good as to concept and the creative idea. Could be worked on, sure, but for now it's fine and I'm wondering if it's unique. Aleister 18:30 14-2-'12
3. God--fcukmanLOOS3R! 09:58, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
4. Keep MrN  Fork you! 12:26, Feb 15
Delete (3)

#Clever title, terrible article.--  06:06, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

1. Stupid and just overall... ...unfunny... --Gamma 14:03, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
2. What? -- 20:25, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
3. Yes, the opening is OK, but the rest isn't, and look at it logically -- who's gonna fix it? 08:10, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

Withdrawing Vote If someone's willing to fix this up, go right ahead. Otherwise, I'm just going to stay neutral for the time being.--  04:11, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

Kept MrN  Fork you! 04:32, Feb 16

## Serbian History • H • T • Add Oldvfd • Deletion Survivor •

Score: 0
Keep (2)
1. After a couple fixed redundancies, the article is slightly (if not adequately) humorous. Looks to be written a little more from the egotistical, Serb nationalist point of view now... --Gamma 01:45, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
2. weak keep.--  06:02, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)
1. Let's see, ooh, this is a good one. A badly written, stubby, Serbian version of Armenian Genocide which, in the entirety of the article, not once uses the word "Bosnia", and actually has Hitler jokes. 18:29, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
2. Not good. -- 19:56, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

Can this be worked into the History section in Serbia? Pup 07:32 12 Feb '12

I was hacking around with this until I saw the link! Yes, that is the best way but the article's tone is so pro-Serb that an outsider may find it hard to incorporate it without going for a rewrite. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:19, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
Unless anyone objects, I will make this a linked page via the main article on Serbia.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:12, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

• Kept Mostly per UN:N. MrN  Fork you! 23:51, Feb 15

## Richard Garfield

Score: 4
Keep (0)

Delete (4)
1. This article has no sense of humor or logic whatsoever. Has nothing to do with Richard Garfield.--  06:35, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
2. Another man who's God. Wow, I've never heard that "joke" before. -- 20:28, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
3. Not enough Chuck Norris. Pup 09:20 15 Feb '12
4. C'est...C'est...eh...(how do you say "garbage" in French?) ~ BB ~ (T) Wed, Feb 15 '12 12:09 (UTC)

## Pingu • H • T • Add Oldvfd • Deletion Survivor •

Score: -1
Keep (4)
1. Nothing special but I REWROTE IT!!1! Nothing special, tad predictable, but surely keepable? 08:58, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
2. Keep. Per above. 11:53, 13 February 2012
3. Rewrite is adequate, if not good. KEEP IT. --Gamma 04:31, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
4. A few shouting big letters want it, so why not. If people continue working on it they may have an interesting page emerge. If not, then it could be shot at dawn when nobody's awake. Aleister 18:32 Cupid Day '12
Delete (3)
1. It's had the Rewrite template for over a month now and it's still poorly written and unfunny, hence the nomination. Sir Georgie Harangue Mediocracy 19:49, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
2. Stupid. -- 19:56, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
3. Master Chief and Snakes on a Pl- KILL IT.--Gamma 05:51, February 13, 2012(UTC)

--  06:00, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

• Now I dunno whether to say "WTF?" or SHOUT IT AT THE TOP OF MY LUNGS! ~ BB ~ (T) Mon, Feb 13 '12 11:48 (UTC)

• Kept Epic. MrN  Fork you! 12:23, Feb 15

## Star Gate episodes and movies • H • T • Add Oldvfd •

Score: -2
Keep (5)
1. Some parts are funny, with good edits it could work--Drunkenshark 15:58, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
2. Per Drunkenshark (Drunkenshark! Hello!). This is an entire history which covers each episode of a popular series, popular enough that it has it's own template. Why in drunken (shark) hell would we want to huff a good summary of an entire popular television series? What has infected this place with the huff fever? If it seems bad at first, spend five minutes tearing into the lede and make it worth reading. Aleister 20:10 11-2-'12
3. Keep. 20:18, 11 February 2012
4. Keep. As a fan of the Stargate franchise, I can say that these summaries are actually pretty good... especially if you've seen some of the episodes. Also Aleister has a point. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 05:15, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
5. Keep--  20:06, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)
1. What the hell is this? -- 15:50, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
2. Umm... tablecruft? 18:30, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
3. Per above. --Gamma 19:54, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
• Kept; sat long enough and negative. 08:19, 15 February 2012

## Big Brother (UK television series) • H • T • Add Oldvfd • Deletion Survivor •

Score: -1
Keep (4)
1. I like the stupid chav thing. Might need a little work, but actually not a bad article for the most part. Pup 08:50 11 Feb '12
2. I'd like to plough Davina's ass, if that's not a reason to keep then I don't know what is. (Per POTR)--(Talk 18:13, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
3. Keep. 20:21, 11 February 2012
4. Vital Aleister 3:04 12-2-'12
Delete (3)
2. The whole "stupid chav" think would be funny if the article was any good. 07:36, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
3. The unnecessary textspeak seals the deal. -- 13:56, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
• Kept; sat long enough. 08:18, 15 February 2012

## Jimmy Carr

Score: 4
Keep (0)

Delete (4)
1. A crufty, listy article about a comedian who I assume is quite obscure in places outside of the UK. 07:54, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
2. I kinda like Jimmy Carr. Shit article though. Pup 08:43 11 Feb '12
3. Nah. -- 13:59, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
4. Nope. --  08:05, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

## Evegeni Malkin

Score: 4
Keep (0)

Delete (4)
1. .....--  07:06, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
2. FUCK DIS ARTICLE! -- 20:29, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
3. I'm not sure if this article is libel or not. Is it libel? 'Cuz I don't want to be sued by a Russian who hits people for a living. It's my understanding that "lawsuit" and "murder" are almost indistinguishable in their language. Oh, God! ~ BB ~ (T) Tue, Feb 14 '12 0:34 (UTC)
4. I don't think any self respecting communist or Russian would love Stalin, unless they were Stalinist or an ultranationalist. The little things can point out an article's inner gears, cogs and tiny springs. This one has been slathered in a metaphorical layer of mustard. --Gamma 04:27, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

## Pet Grues

Score: 5
Keep (0)

Delete (5)
1. Parts of this don't even make sense. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:09, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
2. Wow. -- 00:25, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
3. haw haw yuk yuk --Roman Dog Bird 05:14, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
4. Obliterate! 09:07, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
5. Phew. For a minute there I thought it was just going to be made up of memes and in-jokes. Pup 05:40 11 Feb '12

Score: -3
Keep (7)
1. "Lol dumb" is not a reason.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 13:11, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
2. Keep It actually amused me. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:22, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
3. Lol dumbfunny -- 23:09, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
4. Blargh. 02:28, 11 February 2012
5. Lol smart --JebusCryst 02:46, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
6. Lol smart 06:32, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
7. Lol smart? -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 05:24, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (4)
1. Lol dumb ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:46, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
2. Lol dumb 16:32, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
3. Lol dumb -- 16:37, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
4.  ~ BB ~ (T) Thu, Feb 9 '12 22:16 (UTC).nosaer a si "bmud loL"
1. Lol kept. 21:30, 12 February 2012

## UnScripts:Angry German Kid

Score: 2
Keep (0)

Delete (2)
1. I think it would be best if this page, back from my "what does that button do" days, falls at my own hand. 07:54, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
2. Author request. -- 13:57, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
• Take author requests to QVFD in the future -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:25, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

## HowTo:Write a Wikipedia article

Score: 2
Keep (0)

Delete (2)
1. I think it would be best if this page, back from my "what does that button do" days, falls at my own hand. 07:54, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
2. Author request. -- 13:57, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
• Pop them both on QVFD as author request. Pup 08:46 11 Feb '12

## Worst Article ever

Score: 5
Keep (2)
1. WTF?--fcukmanLOOS3R! 04:15, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
2. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA --Roman Dog Bird 16:15, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (7)
1. No way near bad enough to be worst. This needs some major fucking up to be worthy of the title. So either userspace, or everyone trash it back to the 2005 cruft on steroids. Pup 11:57 09 Feb '12
2. Being intentionally bad is only funny if the article is funny. -- 00:05, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
3. Delete -- 04:57, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
4. Delete, enoguh with the intensionally bad cruft. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:19, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
5. Bitch Penis. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 02:18, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
6. Delete. Just bad is not good enough to keep. It has to be funny and this isn't. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 03:41, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
7. Didn't we delete an article called Worst Article Ever recently? Damned capitalisation. 08:54, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
• No, I will not vote. ~ BB ~ (T) Fri, Feb 10 '12 5:11 (UTC)

## Political Humour

Score: 5
Keep (0)

Delete (5)
1. I fix tagged this page about a month ago, but I've decided to VFD it instead. -- 17:02, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
2. The level of fanboyism here fills me with disgust and revulsion. 17:09, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
3. GEORGE BUSH! -- 23:12, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
4. Not worth fixing. Needs to be written from scratch. ~ BB ~ (T) Fri, Feb 10 '12 5:08 (UTC)
5. Bugger it. I'm not volunteering to save it yet. Send to my userspace. Pup 02:42 11 Feb '12
• Very American-centric, but actually redeemable with a little work, assuming someone is willing to put in the time. Has minor potential, assuming you remove what is supposed to be the examples of political humour. Pup 11:49 09 Feb '12

## The pen is mightier than the sword

Score: 6
Keep (0)

Delete (6)
1. This is bad. -- 16:55, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
2. That is a mess. 17:08, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
3. An effort of a member of the Local Meme-Writers 409. ~ BB ~ (T) Thu, Feb 9 '12 23:06 (UTC)
4. The penis is mightier than the sword. -- 23:11, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
5. I'm voting to delete, and then getting ready for work, and then voting to delete, and then walking to the bus stop, and then voting to delete, and then...Pup 11:44 09 Feb '12
6. The penis is migh- Aw, fuck you, Xamralco. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:48, February 10, 2012 (UTC)

## Subliminal

Score: 6
Keep (0)

Delete (6)
1. 2005cruft. -- 16:43, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
2. It's not entirely without wit, but it's close enough. 16:51, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
3. Delete I killed my parents years ago anyway. MrN  Fork you! 22:32, Feb 9
4. Redirect to the far superior Subliminal stimuli -- 23:10, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
5. For some reason, I have the sudden urge to kill Hyperbole. ~ BB ~ (T) Thu, Feb 9 '12 23:29 (UTC)
6. The green thingy is running backwards. Pup 05:43 11 Feb '12
• Plus side - I now have an idea for an article called Subliminal Pup 05:43 11 Feb '12

## Bikini Bottom

Score: 7
Keep (0)

Delete (7)
1. Delete I started trying to fix it, but I can't MrN  Fork you! 18:07, Feb 9
2. Redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants -- 23:13, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
3. Northern Bikini Bottom, now known as Bikinigakure after Spongebob thought Nazis is allergic of Ninjas. Pup 11:51 09 Feb '12
4. Delete -- 04:57, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
5. Meccch....hecccch....mleeeecccccccccchsplt...hoccchchhhhhhhh....

Sorry, got a hairball. ~ BB ~ (T) Fri, Feb 10 '12 5:07 (UTC)
6. Suck. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:55, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
7. The true worst article ever. Why delete my article when there is this?--fcukmanLOOS3R! 13:06, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
Valid point. Let's delete both. Pup 11:16 10 Feb '12

## Freedom of Expression • H • T • Add Oldvfd • Deletion Survivor •

Score: -2
Keep (4)
1. Epic.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 09:30, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
2. Keep per Xamralco. Pup 10:13 08 Feb '12
3. Makes a good visual satirical point. We are a satire site, and this is a missle right up the blowhole of the censorship crowd. Long live stuff. Aleister 17:12 8-2-'12
4. Per above. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 01:56, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)
1. Ugly, poorly formatted, unfunny mess of censor buttons and just plain annoying coding. -- 02:23, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
2. Were it intelligent, it would pass._______________Go figure. 17:06, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
• Kept MrN  Fork you! 22:26, Feb 9

## Wheeling Jesuit University/Groups/Parkhurst • H • T • Add Oldvfd • Deletion Survivor •

Score: -2
Keep (5)
1. No, in-joke. An actual in-joke. Not some shitty meta article but an actual in-joke. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:02, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
2. TKF knows the stuff. Aleister 00:03 8-2-'12
3. Keep. Per it being an in-joke. -- 02:23, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
4. Keep This joke is out. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:48, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
5. I don't know what the fuck this is, but if TKF wants it, I don't see what it's hurting. 16:33, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)
1. Delete Part of a bigger project, but this one jumped out at me. MrN  Fork you! 18:53, Feb 7
Yikes! -- 20:11, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
3. I don't give a flying fuck if an article is an in-joke, if its shit it gets deleted. If only 3 or 4 users get it and everyone else thinks its an ugly eyesore it should get deleted and this fits the bill of being shit and an eyesore. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:50, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
• Kept MrN  Fork you! 17:29, Feb 9

## File:Lmaowutt.jpg

Score: 1
Keep (1)
1. Keep Can't see her fanny well enough. MrN  Fork you! 07:16, Feb 9
Delete (2)
1. Strong delete I don't know if I'm allowed to add images to VFD, but I am. Anyway, this violates the image policy, as it's pornography that serves no satirical purposes (and I'm sorry, but anyone who says it does is an idiot). It's only used on three pages, one of which is a userspace article and another is an archive for Vandalism/example on wheels! (and I'm sure the other can still exist without this lovely little gem). This image really offends me, and this is coming from a guy that enjoys watching all sorts of porn and violence and rape and shit. Just knowing it's here pisses me off. -- 05:24, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
2. i don't gettit. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:47, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
• You can nominate images for VFD. Tricky one this. I don't think it's a violation of our image policy, and I was the guy complaining about a few images myself a while back. It's not porn IMO because it does not make me want to masturbate. You can see her fanny lips (kinda) which we don't normally allow (normally), but considering that it's used well in one of our articles... Also, she does not look like she is safely strapped into that chair so it might be against health and safety. MrN  Fork you! 07:16, Feb 9
• Full genital nudity, penetration, porno. Autodelete. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 07:19, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
You need to get better porn. MrN  Fork you! 07:23, Feb 9

## Deerfield

Score: 4
Keep (0)

Delete (4)
1. Delete. Dear sir, your town is not interesting. Attempting to make it seem interesting by randomly scattering humor all over the map without regard to concept or theme will not make it seem interesting.--Count of Monkey Crisco 00:31, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
2. Where? -- 00:31, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
3.  ~ BB ~ (T) Tue, Feb 7 '12 11:05 (UTC)
4. Delete Per the Count. MrN  Fork you! 21:14, Feb 8

## Total Drama Island

Score: 6
Keep (1)
1. nope.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 06:32, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
• (nah, changed vote) This satirizes "Paradise Island" a stupid reality show, and looking at the history the lists were not added into late in the game. So.....why not delete the lists, look for the funny in the page, and look through the history for a better version. Aleister 11:19 7-2-'12
• Actually, the article doesn't seem to be a parody...it's about an actual Canadian cartoon spoof of reality TV shows. (And it's only about the first season, at that!) How can you parody a parody? It's all hat and no cattle. ~ BB ~ (T) Tue, Feb 7 '12 11:37 (UTC)
• If you consider the quality of "Paradise Island" it itself is a parody of "Survivor", so this page is apparantly a parody of a parody of a parody, and this VFD nomination takes it to a whole other level. It is a pretty bad page though, so maybe I Kept too soon. I like neutral, where the buffalo roam safely without dart guns or poisoned hay. Aleister 11:45 7-2-'12
Delete (7)
1. Long, listy piece of shit. No one will make it very far in this novel of an article as there is no humor whatsoever. Not to mention that no one cares about this show anyway. -- 00:33, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
2. Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 02:40, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
3. yup. --Roman Dog Bird 07:26, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
4.  ~ BB ~ (T) Tue, Feb 7 '12 11:37 (UTC)
5. Cruft of some sort 16:25, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
6. Burn it with fire. -- 18:27, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
7. What the hell did I just read? Sir Georgie Harangue Mediocracy 18:43, February 8, 2012 (UTC)

## HowTo:Cope with Being Tang'd

Score: 4
Keep (0)

Delete (4)
1. Delete. Hope you saw End of Evangelion and the original Neon Genesis Evangelion series or this article will look like a pile of crap and nonsense. Wait a sec... I love End of Evangelion and this article is still crap and nonsense. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:04, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
2. Bad. -- 03:07, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
4. Aleister 11:57 7-2-'12

## Mr. Gandhi

Score: 4
Keep (0)

Delete (4)
1. Delete. Apparently this guy has no neck. That's the joke. No neck. That's the entire joke. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:15, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
2.  ~ BB ~ (T) Tue, Feb 7 '12 0:22 (UTC)
3. I tried to think of a redeeming quality but there is none. -- 00:30, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
4. He has no neck. There used to be a baseball player Walter "No Neck" Williams. He had no neck. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha huh? Aleister 1:15 7-2-'12

## Template:Resident Evil series

Score: 5
Keep (1)
1. Maybe someone can check the red link pages to see if they were really that bad or if they got caught up in a forest fire before joining the other animals and escaping into the river. Or maybe someone can take the movie pages and combine them into a coherent page. Or maybe....nah. Aleister 13:19 5-2-'12
Delete (6)
1. I love resident evil games, but unfortunately, it seems this template was made before a raging storm of deletion passed by. Mattsnow 12:01, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
2. If you remove all the redlinks, there's really nothing there. -- 13:07, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
3. Without even looking at it, I say "kill it". ~ BB ~ (T) Sun, Feb 5 '12 21:06 (UTC)
HEY, THAT'S NOT RIGHT YOU DUMBASS! NEXT TIME YOU NOMINATE ONE OF YOUR FILTHY ARTICLES ON VFH, I'M GOING TO VOTE AGAINST IT WITHOUT EVEN LOOKING AT IT! How about that? I'm scary in all caps, eh? :D Mattsnow 04:15, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
I...I was kinda joking. It takes all of two seconds to look at it and see all the red links, right? ~ BB ~ (T) Mon, Feb 6 '12 4:23 (UTC)
4. Delete. Upon looking at the red links I noticed they don't link to anything. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:33, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
5. Simplify into See Alsos. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 04:36, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
6. Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:28, February 7, 2012 (UTC)

## Guitar Duel

Score: 4
Keep (0)

Delete (4)
1. Stupid. -- 22:54, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
2. Delte -- 21:18, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
3. This page totally doesn't fucking need to exist. --Roman Dog Bird 07:18, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
4. This page causes an inexplicable vacuum in the presence of spherical or ovoidal objects. And it sucks balls. Pup 09:21 06 Feb '12
5. Delete MrN  Fork you! 16:52, Feb 6

## The Hulk (film)

Score: 5
Keep (0)

Delete (5)
1. So shitty, it's unbelievable. -- 21:12, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
2. Delete -- 21:16, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
3. Too many red links. Aleister 21:25 4-1-'12
4. Terrible and needs to be killed with fire. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 20:18, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
5. HULK SMASH ~ BB ~ (T) Sun, Feb 5 '12 20:22 (UTC)

## Skrillex

Score: 6
Keep (0)

Delete (6)
1. There's like nothing here. No content, no jokes, nothing. How this survived ICU/QVFD is beyond me. -- 21:06, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
2. Delete -- 21:16, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
3. Reads like an ad, and then it has an outside link which I am not going to click on. Aleister 21:27 4-2-'12
4. Almost QVFD-worthy, if not already... --Gamma 07:27, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
5. this guy's a faggot anyways --PENIS 08:33, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
6. It's like Steve-O from Jackass: stubby trash. ~ BB ~ (T) Sun, Feb 5 '12 20:23 (UTC)

## Constitution (Games) • H • T • Add Oldvfd •

Score: 3
Keep (0)
1. I like it. Pup 10:31 28 Jan '12
Delete (3)
1. Wow, not good. -- 16:04, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
2. Book of Erotic Delete. -- 02:52, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
3. I dunno, man. One or two funny things amongst a mass of nonsense. Also, nobody gives a fuck about Dungeons and Drag Queens.  ~ BB ~ (T) Wed, Feb 1 '12 9:39 (UTC)
• On second thought, meh. Pup 12:14 28 Jan '12
• Kept; apathy. 07:04, 6 February 2012
• Boo, unlock it, and I'll get someone else to vote "kill". Then you can huff it. ~ BB ~ (T) Mon, Feb 6 '12 7:10 (UTC)

## Macon, Georgia • H • T • Add Oldvfd • Deletion Survivor •

Score: -1
Keep (3)
1. Nothing special, buts its not that bad... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:31, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
2. Per Frosty, then I edited it and fixed it, but still per Frosty. Aleister 13:36 5-2-'12
3. 42% per Frosty, 35% per Aleister and 23% Scottish. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:25, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)
1. Towncruft. -- 15:56, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
2. Bad, think its young enough for an ICU, though. -- 02:51, January 28, 2012 (UTC)