This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy had some advice to offer on drunk: 'Get rid of it,' it said, 'and redirect to Inebriated'. " —The preceding unsigned comment was added byPuppyOnTheRadio (talk • contribs)
Restored the first section that was heavily vandalized by an IP. The rest of it still sucks though. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN)Talk here. 09:11, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
A vital article, works as a placeholder. Besides, its got lots of shiny bulleted points.-- Simsilikesims(♀GUN)Talk here. 02:02, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
Per Sisilikesims, word for word, word. Aleister 15:07 23-1-'12
Technically not a vital article, although Firearm, Machine gun and Gunpowder are. Having said that, it's a short article, but not a stub (ie more than two paragraphs and an image.) Listy, but as per that above, bullet points are somewhat relevant here. And I got a laugh out of it, so keep-worthy. Pup 08:50 24 Jan '12
To be honest, I want to see this on the front page. -- 06:29, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)
Quite possibly the most asinine stub ever. EpicAwesomeness(talk) 16:11, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
This has no redeeming qualities other than being a vital article. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 16:05, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
Strong delete Whats so vital about this article? I mean just redirect to handgun as a placeholder if thats such a big issue. Its just a bunch of dot points with nothing interesting about them and whats funny about *************************
Comments
Well, I made it a bit better. By no means is it a good article, but if it's vital, heh heh, why not. For example, London is an article with a fix tag, yes, but as it's vital, let's just say that I specified non-true. EpicAwesomeness(talk) 19:42, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
Kinda a two-trick pony: bullet-lists and bullet-puns. I wish it had Jimmy Cagney in it, shouting "Made it, Ma! Toppa the woild!" before exploding. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 12:56 (UTC)
Kept by people voting keep. 1234~07:14, 27 January 2012
A crappy cross between pick up the phone booth and VMCSE, but not as good as either. About half a dozen pages I gameplay. The funniest part is being eaten by a grue. Pup 01:33 25 Jan '12
Hey, I have "an iMac G3, running on Mac OS X 10.4". Fuck you die, article! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 13:39 (UTC)
Should be sent to the Moon - not funny, badly edited article with no pictures. nothing worth saving SirPtok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 13:33, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
Although a Vital article, saving this even as a placeholder for colonization or another major collab would do great damage to both uncyclopedia and wikia, and to the innernests in general. Aleister 13:43 26-1-'12
Comments
This is bad, but what's the point of VFDing an ICU'd article? --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 15:03, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
The point is you can't. Read our deletion policy a little more closely, Ptok. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:06, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
Not deletable, and actually a very good article, although it shouldn't have been on the main page (hardly understandable if you don't know the songs). A very good example of song titles and song words put together on a page is Maxwell Edison, which with a little editing can be featurable. It's got to tell a readable story to a non-fan to work well. Aleister 8:07 26-1-'12
Keep. I see nothing wrong with it. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 08:26, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. If you don't know that this is an attempt to create a story using the titles of They Might Be Giants songs this looks like a pile of random arglebargle. If you do recognize that it's a news article that inserts They Might Be Giants songs into sentences it's still pretty fucking retarded.--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:00, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
I'm sorry you feel that way. I did try to make it funny. -Tritefantastic 05:18, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
It reads like a school assignment where your teacher made you compose a story using a list of arbitrary vocabulary words. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:20, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Upon closer inspection, date of creation does not fit criteria for deletion. You oughta know better, Monkey. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:58, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
I wanna hate this, but I can't. The joke is, no matter what path you take, you die. It's like a Cohen brothers movie. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 13:06 (UTC)
Kept; apathy or something. 1234~15:39, 25 January 2012
I'm trying to think of what they call it when you have a yes/no question but answering either way could be misconstrued. You know what I mean, don't you? Pup 02:01 25 Jan '12
I was about to ICU this article, then I checked the revision history. The article was created by an IP (I think it was in 2010?), and revision history shows no good revisions. Formatting is sub-par; the photos are properly thumbnailed, sections divided (albeit some poorly) , et cetera..., However, the tone is, generally, unencyclopedic (and not the good kind...), and I'm assuming only twelve-year-olds would find this funny, based upon the sarcastic and profanity laced rant about "n00b guns..." --Gamma287 21:59, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
I stopped reading after "Chuck Norris". Then I started reading again a moment later, but I stopped again after "Fucking Noob-Ass Cheap Guns". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 12:16 (UTC)
It reads like it has been translated from somewhere else. I'm assuming it's english Bad just. Pup 12:20 22 Jan '12
Seriously, this does not sound like proper English. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 02:31, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
Do, doo, do do doo do huh? Um, yeah Delete.EpicAwesomeness(talk) 15:52, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
I get that some people like this, but I didn't laugh oncet, and ...uh... "funny" is paramount, right? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 13:19 (UTC)
Comments
If this hyena burns to death, can I have a Userspace copy? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 02:27, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
Invalid nom, no VFD template placed. This is obviously a miracle of Zim buddhism, and should be venerated as such And I just read the page four times, and after awhile the narrative took form and things emerged from the prose to form a pattern. Me scared, but me no pray to God no more, as that would be folly. Anyway, an interesting page. Aleister 13:30 25-1-'12
I actually rather like this one. Granted, I may have just gone in the wrong direction with it... 1234~04:56, 21 January 2012
I like this one alot, one of the only games I've ever played here. I added some of the pics, and each of the pages could have interesting pics on them. Pretty well written and nice clean boxes too, along with the pics. Made me laugh when I first came across it. Aleister 5:06 21-1-'12
This is Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens' masterpiece. It made me laugh. We need some of these types to stick around for the duration, so why not this one? Lord Fluffy! Aleister 00:31 20-1-'12
Okay then... --Gamma287 02:27, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
lakfhe eipanfieop aepfhaiofhif xvmieenvi euiehaiufa 99999999999999999999 eeakeaoeifa doody. Yay! I wrote an article! --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 22:34, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
I dunno, but I just looked at it again and starting lol immediately. Something about how the page is arranged, or maybe just that extra dimension of weirdness accidently captured just right to be funny. At least to me. And it seems to be the best article of a former user who put lots of work into it. But most of all, lol. Aleister 3:50 20-1-'12
Delete Style over substance in as much as there's no substance and the style made me punch a horse. Yes, a horse. Not a nice horse, but a horse.mAttlobster. (hello) 23:40, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
I had some of the credit of writing this game. Don't delete it. are you guys happy if all of uncyclopedia's articles get huffed?--fcukmanLOOS3R! 09:52, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
So every article in uncyclopedia is shit then. LOL--fcukmanLOOS3R! 13:07, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
C'mon, MrEx, there are 5,000 really shit articles on Uncyclopedia, just waiting to be deleted. Find them. And then nominate them! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jan 21 '12 14:03 (UTC)
Delete (5)
Though slightly better written, this one is, like its predecessor, another crufty, unfunny pile of subpages that don't go anywhere. 1234~04:12, 21 January 2012
Shite is still shite when it has a sequel. Pup 04:14 21 Jan '12
This was previously kept in the hopes that its creator would improve upon it, but a year later it is still unfunny cruft that goes nowhere. 1234~04:08, 21 January 2012
The creator expanded it. It's like the difference between a partially full and a burst colostomy bag Pup 04:14 21 Jan '12
It's a game for a start but yeah it sucks also. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 01:32, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
This, and it's sequel, is kind of like dandruff. I don't like it, it's just I can't really care enough to hate it. - ENTER CITADELT)alkC)untributionsB)an 10:09, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
Keep. I rewrote the intro, and I think its a little better now. It helps explain to new Uncyclopedians what we mean by listcruft. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN)Talk here. 07:23, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
per Simsilikesims. If I had more time I'd make a list of why this should be kept, But I've got four more episodes of "Big Love" and miles to go before I sleep. Aleister 13:07 17-1-'12
Fuckit hard. Super unoriginal and unfunny in its intentional unoriginality. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:03, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
Say whuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut!?! --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 22:52, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
Using the word "gay", "gays" or "gayness" 6 times in the first paragraph makes it hilarious right? Wrong! -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN)Talk here. 04:06, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
Badly executed, which is a shame. Concept could have been executed much better. Pup 06:57 20 Jan '12
Uhhh so Jesus first synthesized Bangladesh in the future and then went on more pointless shit. Cool story bro, fuck intentionally bad articles they aren't funny. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 03:03, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
If huffed, a sad state of affairs, it looks like a user page for Socky who has started to work this one into a masserpiece. A great start and the potential is potentiallucious. I almost used that god pic yesterday too. Aleister 22:31 17-1-'12
Because Frosty has no idea what an injoke actually is and VI needs to smack him upside the head. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 08:32, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
All Jack and no work makes dull a play boy. I dunno', but I'm voting keep. Twas' quite humorous, even if it was a bit short... --Gamma287 02:33, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)
Injoke, intensional bad, looking like whats about or not. I hate seeing bullshit like this being allowed to exist and people like me being told they aren't funny when they actually TRY and make an article. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 05:30, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
I presume all these "intentionally bad" jokes exist because people no longer know how to do good ones. - ENTER CITADELT)alkC)untributionsB)an 16:29, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
If we're gonna burn all the "intentionally bad" articles, we should keep this one. It's neat and works on so many levels. Well, two. --EpicAwesomeness(talk) 17:16, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
I'm with the "kill" voters, but I think this would make a funny article if it weren't so ...unimaginative. Did anybody other than me know that Shakespeare, Herman Melville and Martin Luther King Jr. had one thing in common? I'll tell you what it is, before you all go scrambling over to Wikipedia and spend the rest of your day drawing Venn diagrams: they were all tremendous plagiarists. What's plagiarism? It's the last refuge of the unoriginal mind. My point is, why did no one think of that angle? How 'bout an article that's a parody of Romeo and Juliet, Israel Potter and Moby-Dick, and the I Have a Dream speech? And maybe throw in some CSI:Crime Scene Investigation and Lady Gaga? You people astound me with your banality.
You'd all make great plagiarists, though! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jan 19 '12 9:56 (UTC)
My god, a user who actually knows about the plagerized "I have a dream" speech. If only Prathia Hall were still alive to see this. Aleister 20:31 19-1-'12
Kept again. Also, I'm sure that if you rewrite it with a solid bit (sounds like you got a good angle) Bizzee, you should have no problem replacing what's already there. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 07:57, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
LFLHSLDOIHWLELWEMWOFNIWEBQPEMZXOIPHWEPIWelkehfpihiuobeaipeh9932u98498543h98h78w0qh0qjweq90ej90jq90etyu098e49q0ewjjoiajdsaoudhoiusopsdad///a;d,a//aoa,,>????pfaqoipewaj!!!!!!!!!!!... ...Sorry, I don't know what that was. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 20:10, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
Nobody cares. This is shitty vandalism that fails in every way possible. Fuck being intentionally bad, it will never take the place of ACTUAL humor. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 21:52, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
This page is hopeless imnho. I huffed large sections of it and it still lives with nothing to sustain it. Maybe redirect to the other MLK page, but that page is shit too, with the only good stuff being what remains from the wikipedia spork. Assassinate both pages and put up a placeholder might be the way to put this guy out of his misery. Aleister 00:44 16-1-'12
We shouldn't have two articles on the same guy, and Martin Luther King is the better of the two. Pup 12:51 16 Jan '12
It has some ideas that aren't too bad (Elvis killed Martin Luther King, Jayne Mansfield killed for her love of MLK etc) but marred by some ugyly stuff that isn't any good. Perhaps a combo of the good from this and the other MLK article? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:26, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
In joke from 2005 that it just plain bullshit ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 00:22, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
Dump. The discussion page says it was entirely moved over from another site, so it isn't original to here. We might as well copy and paste a Letterman monologue and feature it. Aleister 00:28 16-1-'12
An important topic, maybe even Vital. It's not that bad, esp. as a placeholder. I did some deletion, blah rewrite, but it's maybe now presentable. The dog gif is funny. And stubs are OK, wikipedia probably has a million of them (literally), esp. as placeholders, although this is kind of a non-stub now. Aleister 00:33 14-1-'12
The compilation has a link to this article, which most likely crosses the line between humor and horror. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN)Talk here. 08:46, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
This page reminds me of E.D's "offended" article. It gets worse as you scroll down, till you just want to puke.... - ENTER CITADELT)alkC)untributionsB)an 20:38, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
I have no idea what this is talking about, but even if I did the shoddy execution is inexcusable. This article can be summarized as: Incoherent nonsense, rant, list, list, rant and categories. - ENTER CITADELT)alkC)untributionsBan 16:11, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
<- This thing should be all over this article. I am disappoint. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:27, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. This was actually intended to be a parody of this manga, but given how awfully its written, I'm not surprised that nobody got it. --Scofield & Dudes 17:19, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
Remove the lists and randomness and there's no article left. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 22:30, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
I'm learning stuff from "reading" the page. Educational at least. Iz trimmed a tiny bit of the lede to fix red link and make it more of a lede. Aleister 00:47 14-1-'12
Athough it's certainly not featurable, I think my fixing-upping has made the page keepable at the least. EpicAwesomeness(talk) 08:43, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
You one sexy witch, Epic. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 15 '12 13:50 (UTC)
Good page. Honestly could be improved still with a bit of formatting and a few minor changes, but worth keeping. Also would have 1337 as a redirect to this as well. Pup 01:57 15 Jan '12
I'm here to ruin the party.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 15:04, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
2006 cruft that sucks in content and formatting ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 22:10, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol. --SirXamRalcothe Mediocre 22:56, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
Ehhhhhhhhh. Probably our best "leet" article but does that really mean anything at all. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 09:47, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Persons, I am fixing this article(s). Please pay close attention and make sure I do not step on your pet cat(s). EpicAwesomeness(talk) 09:38, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
To the ashbin of history Merge or redirect to Mohandas Gandhi, and let's build up that page. This one is blah to the blah extent, except one picture, which can be moved. Aleister 9:56 26-1-'12
Well, maybe it's no that bad, but it is bad and needs work. Teams of horses could work on it and just muddy it up, but a team of writers may be able to bring some sense into this guy's life history. He never did want to be called Mahatma though, and disliked anyone using that. Then again, he didn't want to be called "pious midget grabby-hands destitute asshole" either, but plenty of Indian women did call him that, which made him bitter and revengeful. Aleister 13:50 26-1-'12