Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive256

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Whut? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 12:40 (UTC) Oh shit, that first quote is so funny! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:07, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Nix -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:00, December 14, 2011 (UTC) Nix is Latin for snow. The more you know! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:57, 14 December 2011 And unix, of course, is the Geek form of eunuchs. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 14 '11 9:47 (UTC) That first quote is the only redeeming quality of this article. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 03:35, December 14, 2011 (UTC) I agree Bangkok sucks --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 15:23, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	More from the Americruft series. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 12:19 (UTC) "Americans are just plain stupid..." From that line alone, you know this article is going to suck. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:06, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Removed the above line (which was added by an IP) but the article still sucks. It hasn't changed much in a year at all. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:05, December 13, 2011 (UTC) This can take a hike. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 03:41, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Australian user sees nothing wrong with this. 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:51, December 14, 2011 (UTC) Well, I joined Uncyclopedia specifically to make fun of America, and I can tell you this article has nothing new to say. Also, I suspect everything after the intro and the first paragraph was written by a 13-year-old. Feel free to fix the "jokes" so they're actually funny. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 14 '11 0:59 (UTC)

Score: -6
Keep (7)	ha.--fcukman~~LOOS3R!~~ 11:46, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Not that bad... -- 13:51, December 13, 2011 (UTC) It's only used on one mainspace article but it is funny in the context of said article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:58, December 13, 2011 (UTC) I think I could use this somewhere... --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 22:48, December 13, 2011 (UTC) The FBI told me to vote keep, or else I'd be in BIG BIG TROUBLE. 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:57, December 14, 2011 (UTC) Nothing wrong with this. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 03:44, December 14, 2011 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:11, 14 December 2011
Delete (1)	BFM ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
Comments	This one made me laugh, so I won't vote. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 9:06 (UTC) Just making sure you're aware of this, but if something makes you laugh, you can also vote to keep it. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:47, 13 December 2011 Well, yeah, but an IP completely changed it, and I still dunno if it's really that useful. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 22:45 (UTC) Comment. Could be useful to have for Category:Federal Bureau of Investigation. MadMax 21:59, December 13, 2011 (UTC) Kept -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 05:53, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	BFM. DO NOT WANT ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 07:21, December 12, 2011 (UTC) yuk yuk --Roman Dog Bird 08:08, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 08:09, December 12, 2011 (UTC) UN:N ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 10:06 (UTC) Suck. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:54, December 12, 2011 (UTC) OMG he iz so f@t! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre** 21:33, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Cool story from. BFM ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 07:23, December 12, 2011 (UTC) haw haw --Roman Dog Bird 08:03, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 08:10, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Yawn. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 10:25 (UTC) This is soooooooo original. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre** 21:32, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Some very bizarre 2005cruft, which is a good reason to keep it. Enjoyable and creative, imnho. Aleister 15:28 12-12-'11
Delete (5)	Some very bizarre 2005cruft. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:30, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. 22:01, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Shite. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:28, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. well that's 12 seconds of my life i'm never getting back. - $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 01:38, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete.--Pudong 03:11, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep. An alright little stub. Granted it's silly but still amusing for those interested in obscure leftist politicians.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:34, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)	This is a bad. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:24, December 11, 2011 (UTC) All those references to Hitler and gay sex with Satan really lack originality. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:38, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Agree with Zombiebaron's opinion. 22:03, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Terrible -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 01:40, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Delete. It's bad. --Pudong 03:14, December 12, 2011 (UTC) Short, no pictures, GAY JOKES, stole a joke from South Park. You are the weakest link. Good-bye. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 9:56 (UTC) Wasn't there a South Park episode on how jokes aren't necessarily stolen just because The Simpsons did it already? I guess that could apply to South Park too. Well, unless it's really obviously stolen from South Park. I actually have no idea what joke you're referring to. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:00, 12 December 2011 The episode was about how stealing jokes from The Simpsons was OK, because The Simpsons stole all their ideas from old episodes of The Twilight Zone and The Outer Limits. Or something. (You and I just lost any of our remaining Kewl Points for remembering that episode.) Anyway, I was referring to the joke about "Hitler moving in with his gay boyfriend, Satan." (Dictator enamored with Satan? That's, like, the longest-running South Park joke. LAZY. LAZY LAZY LAME.) ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 11:06 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 8
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (8)	unfunny, poorly formatted, from 2007 and did I mention unfunny? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) I really can't see any use for this. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:50, December 11, 2011 (UTC) ghey. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 13:53, December 11, 2011 (UTC) lolwtf -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:41, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, subst it in the userpages it's used in and then get rid of it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:49, 11 December 2011 Great image, but I couldn't see this on a userpage. -- 17:52, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. 22:23, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Die stupid article DIE ...I mean, template! Wait, what article is this, again? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 8:49 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 3 + 6 BFMs
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Ban from mainspace (6)	Ban this from mainspace but don't delete it since many users use it on their userpage. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:48, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, ban it from mainspace but keep it in templatespace. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:19, 11 December 2011 Good idea, old chaps! strokes oversized mustache Talk! Contribs! 17:13, December 11, 2011 (UTC) What them folks. For some reason users love this shit. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:21, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Points up -- 20:26, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Uncyc was built on this template, damn it! Where's your respect for the veterans? goes into seizure 2K12_DAN.VRS 22:02, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	This is still not funny ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:41, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Now with 6 BFMs. 22:15, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Removed from mainspace. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:55, 12 December 2011

Score: 2
Keep (2)	It is dumb but I say keep-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 03:42, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Keeperit. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:55, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Horrible. Mattsnow 18:25, December 6, 2011 (UTC) That's a pretty lame excuse for an UnNews article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:18, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:15, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Obliterate. The horror! The horror!! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 22:17 December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. This was nommed on VFH back in 2007. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:04, 6 December 2011 And Zombiebaron voted for...-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 03:40, December 7, 2011 (UTC) I'm torn. Yes it's short, and crappy. But it also has the phrase "cock-juggling thunder cunt." Anyway, UnNews stories are just as transitory in nature as their legitimate brethren. Should all UnNews stories be deleted when they're no longer topical? I'm not asking rhetorically; I really want to know. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 7 '11 3:57 (UTC) Sat long enough. Cat. 1 2 3 4 ~ 17:42, 11 December 2011

Score: 3
Keep (4)	Keep. Quite accurate if you live in the same country. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 22:24, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I'll trust Romartus on this one.-- Phlegm Leoispotter** * (garble! jank!) 01:13, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Keep Nowhere near deletion. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:13, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Though it is a bit listy I think this is very funny although some of it is only humourous to the brithish who are a minority on this website. Cool I Get A Signature 18:41, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	This isn't good. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:47, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Short and listy. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:39, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I'd say 'listicide' but that would leave a whopping one paragraph. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 00:37, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Remarkably contentless -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:46, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Wikipedia has "Tykes", but it's just a redirect. Featured User 04:49, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Listy list is listy. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 22:21 December 10, 2011 (UTC) --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:12, December 11, 2011 (UTC) Not for Black flamingo. --Black Flamingo 17:25, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Sat too long. Kept. 1 2 3 4 ~ 17:41, 11 December 2011

Score: 2
Keep (6)	It has a rather... interesting approach. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:03, 4 December 2011 Its funny so keep it ^_^ OH NO NOT MORE DELETE WE NEED SUPPORTERS!!! ]] --Yuki 23:32, December 5, 2011 (UTC) More funny pokemon articles, i will make.--~~Fcukman~~LOOS3R!!! 03:23, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Needs cleanup and images, but not delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:30, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I think it's a unique approach (at least from what I've seen) and it should be kept. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 05:57, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Good people want to keep it. Fuck them all, but hey, why not? Aleister 15:55 7-12-'11
Delete (8)	It's a bunch of annoying, dumb fandom. "Ashy-kins! I love him so much~! ♥♥♥" Fuck you. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:41, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 20:12, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Fandom? On Uncyc? That's a paddlin'. 2K12_DAN.VRS 03:07, December 5, 2011 (UTC) The only reason one would vote keep is because of the unique approach, but it has been done (to a better extent) in Fruits. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 03:27, December 5, 2011 (UTC) not funny at all -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:35, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Its awful so delete it insert retarded a n i m e face here OH NO MORE KEEP WE NEED SUPPORTERS!!! ]] --Roman Dog Bird 18:50, December 8, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Fuck this article, no laughs found. Featured User 04:54, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I've actually been working on a full rewrite of this for some time now. I'm ramping up production on it, so I don't really care what happens to this mess. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 22:12 December 10, 2011 (UTC) There's been more than plenty of time for people to come to a clear consensus on this. A majority of 2 is way too low to delete this. Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:17, 11 December 2011

Score: -4
Keep (7)	Keep. Added a few lines and illustrations. I think this can be kept now. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 09:30, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:53, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Keep Don't know what it was like before. But it's SPOON! mAttlobster. (hello) 23:12, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Ya sure -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:27, December 9, 2011 (UTC) No longer short and shitty. —Sir Socky** (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:37, 9 December 2011 Someone please close this nomination. Someone else may vote "delete" as a joke, and I shall be forced to maim them in a very original and piquant fashion. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Dec 10 '11 1:37 (UTC) Keep. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK]19:55 Dec 10 2011
Delete (3)	Short and shitty. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:43, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete. This article has no redeeming qualities. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 03:11, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 11:33, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Does have a few good ideas here and this joke Hotdogs With Mustard Gas. Agree though it's underdeveloped.--*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 08:11, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Kept. —Sir Socky** (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:49, 10 December 2011

Score: -4
Keep (5)	A little more could help it. Like a much better conclusion. But other than that, it's just fine. Like, alright. Maybe okay. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:22, December 9, 2011 (UTC) SelfKeep. If you'd like to know what this article is about, just click the Wikipedia link. Also, I have no objection to the creation of a "Captain Understatement" article, though I don't think the hypothetical creation of one would make Understatement redundant. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:34, 9 December 2011 Keep. It's not that bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:05, December 9, 2011 (UTC) Keep. it requires a little work is all... not deletion material -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 05:25, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK]19:31 Dec 10 2011
Delete (1)	Always disliked this article. Could be much better, maybe as Captain Understatement. --AmericanBastard 12:39, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Yeah kept. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:54, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Score: -2
Keep (5)	Keep. Weaker stuff, but not really deletion worthy. I think notable topics should preferably be kept.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:18, December 8, 2011 (UTC) mario is currently in a terrist organisation with britriny spears --Roman Dog Bird 18:39, December 8, 2011 (UTC) Keep in accordance with Bizzeebeever's bet. We must reach FIVE! 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:36, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep. This article isn't bad enough to be deleted, as sycamore puts it. Featured User 04:47, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:50, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	I find this article terrible, but I bet five people vote "keep". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 8 '11 6:43 (UTC) That would be correct :D ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:51, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Another example of a bad gaming article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:27, December 8, 2011 (UTC) Fixed the first third or so, but the rest is utter unsalvegable garbage. Talk! Contribs! 08:40, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Again... Remember your {{VFD}} tags so authors can come to stick up for their work etc.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:18, December 8, 2011 (UTC) Sure this is kept too. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:53, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Score: -6
Keep (6)	Keep, but chop half off It's great up until about Adolf's Hitler's Death. Then it's stupid from thereon. 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:34, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep. requires a bit of clean up but it's okay -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 05:19, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep.This anon did some really nice work. -- 08:00, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Dat bastard better join. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:29, December 10, 2011 (UTC) IPs that save an article? I always knew they existed. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:24, December 10, 2011 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:26, 10 December 2011
Delete (0)	Delete.Big and stupid. -- 13:30, December 9, 2011 (UTC) ~~Dem crumpets is sexy! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:06, December 9, 2011 (UTC)</s>~~ tl;dr ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:25, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:27, 10 December 2011

Score: 4
Keep (2)	Not terrible enough.--<strike>Fcukman LOOS3R!!! 02:40, December 7, 2011 (UTC) The discussion board section made me grin. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:46, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, that would be the only thing funny in that article. And that's a "barely". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 7 '11 21:11 (UTC)
Delete (6)	What's good about this article? The Osama bin Laden jokes don't work anymore (got him!), the sexual comments are just weird, and everything else (and there isn't much else) is crap. I think it's time to give up on the fix tag and just delete this one. Themanfromscene24 17:52, December 6, 2011 (UTC) lol, neopets -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:06, December 6, 2011 (UTC) omg, it sux. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:17, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:15, December 7, 2011 (UTC) George Bush, Osama bin Laden, huffing kittens, masturbating. And that's the first section. Another sad example of a parody article being longer than the subject being parodied. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 7 '11 21:11 (UTC) Delete --2K12_DAN.VRS 00:39, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	If someone were willing to do a gut job on it to remove the crap, then it would be salvageable.-- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 06:08, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Congratulations, you've been nominated. [hands Ferric_AlFerrous a shovel and a machete] ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 7 '11 21:11 (UTC)

Score: -1
Keep (7)	Keep. Weaker stuff sure, needs re-work... not really deletion worthy.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:16, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep. if the crap were edited out of this so it's not as long as a freakin' book it would be all right. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 01:38, December 4, 2011 (UTC) It's got enough keepable stuff to save it from the guillotine. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:37, 4 December 2011 Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:24, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep Some good ideas in here.mAttlobster. (hello) 20:30, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep! See above. Also, because some clever banana helped the opening. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 06 Dec 2011 ~ 07:16 (UTC) Keep. All of the above, and Panda is my cup of tea. And good people want to keep it. Fuck them all, but hey, why not? Aleister 15:57 7-12-'11
Delete (6)	Delete. See my theory on the snowball effect, located here. -- Talk! Contribs! 08:17, December 3, 2011 (UTC) EpicAwesomeness has a good point. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:11, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Xamralco has a good point. -- 17:11, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete. I must destroy ALL the pandas! 2K12_DAN.VRS 03:10, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Introduces dozens of unrelated concepts, all of which are uniformly awful. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:49, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	EpicAwesomeness - Please remember your {{VFD}} tags:0)--Sycamore (Talk) 10:16, December 3, 2011 (UTC) 155 hours of consensuslessness = Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:39, 9 December 2011

Score: 3
Keep (4)	How about editing it slightly so that it labels the user/author of page as a n00b? It has some potential. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 05:30, December 3, 2011 (UTC) I like it. Feel free to ban it from mainspace, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:15, 3 December 2011 Keep. Better than Weaksauce. Should be used more often. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 06 Dec 2011 ~ 08:20 (UTC) Decent. -- 01:46, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	What the fuck is this shit? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 05:35, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Ban from mainspace. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:06, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Ew. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:24, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete. Used in a single userspace. Can be subst'd. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:22, December 6, 2011 (UTC) This template does everything wrong. There is not one single redeeming value about this template. It is not amusing. It is not correctly formatted. It takes up far too much space with its bloated ugliness. It uses {{USERNAME}}. And it is not funny. Then again, that was a given with the {{USERNAME}} thing. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 08:21 Dec 07, 2011 Well, Skullthumper and SPIKE are ...sorta... back. Them Mayan calender makers musta been right. 2012 is the End. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 7 '11 21:18 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 2
Keep (7)	no.--~~Fcukman~~LOOS3R!!! 02:37, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Very Keep. Some funny is there... Also I think major "Real Life " topics should be kept, and rewritten. I think IC is coming back, maybe we could put this on there?--Sycamore (Talk) 10:11, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Not bad enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:00, 3 December 2011 Keep Could do with losing about 60%. But there's some nice sexy action in this whore house. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:33, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep Not terrible.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 21:08, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Keep! Brake angrily Kenny! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 06 Dec 2011 ~ 08:26 (UTC) Keep. All of the above, and South Park is my cup of tea. Keep working on it though. Some good people want to keep it. Fuck them all, but hey, why not? Aleister 15:57 7-12-'11
Delete (9)	Delete. I love the show but this page is far too informative for Uncyclopedia. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 01:53, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Weak Delete. It's not that bad but there really aren't any funny jokes. I'd say it's mediocre at best. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:28, December 3, 2011 (UTC) This is one of those 2005/2006 pages that starts of small but becomes like a snowball rolling down a hill as it gathers more vandalism and cruft until it's one big forty kilobyte shit heap. Talk! Contribs! 08:15, December 3, 2011 (UTC) yes. --Roman Dog Bird 08:34, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Oui. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:51, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Kill -- 2K12_DAN.VRS 05:12, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Start anew. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:44, December 6, 2011 (UTC) What TKF said. ~jcm 23:19, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	IC is coming back? ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 06 Dec 2011 ~ 08:26 (UTC) Why did we not wait for the {{fix}} to expire before going to VFD? At least, why did someone not remove the {{fix}} and drop a note on the talk page explaining the situation? --Pentium5dot1 t ~^_^~c 00:00, December 9, 2011 (UTC) Damnit Pentium, quit pointin out that we're all fools. (just kidding, keep doing it, we gotta stay on our toes.) -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:27, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive256

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Contents

Score: -2
Keep (6)	Keep. Looks alright enough...--Sycamore (Talk) 10:17, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Funny and playful from start to finish `.and.` written in the style of the thing it is about `.and.` full of inside jokes (Bacchus?). Even the digression to Super Mario is based on something real--read the talk page. Compare to the aimless drivel that nominator recently injected into North Dakota. Spıke ¬ 14:53 4-Dec-11 Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 15:13, December 4, 2011 (UTC) .Keep. .Because. . ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 06 Dec 2011 ~ 08:16 (UTC). Keep. I generally think it's a bad idea to delete articles by established users. Plus this ain't bad.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 04:40, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Keep. SPIKE????? Spike is back????? There is a Santa Claus! And All of the above, and FORTRAN is my cup of tea. And good people want to keep it. Fuck them all, but hey, why not? Aleister 15:59 7-12-'11
Delete (4)	Delete. the page just isn't funny -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 06:02, December 3, 2011 (UTC) This page is just boring. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:07, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) I believe that this page should be deleted because it is boring and isn't funny. It is incredibly dry and seemingly jokeless for long stretches; every joke the author does make is cliche and easy. Also, puns are not "inside jokes." -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:44, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Terms like "Boring" or "Isn't Funny" are pretty subjective (especially on their own). Are there more legitimate reasons why you think this contributers work should be deleted?--Sycamore (Talk) 11:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Ooh, it's 3 Keep vs 3 Delete! This is exciting! 2K12_DAN.VRS 05:11, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Aww, now it's not. Bah. 2K12_DAN.VRS 05:33, December 7, 2011 (UTC) Kept, apparently. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:07, 7 December 2011

Score: 4
Keep (3)	Keep. sure it's stupid but it could easily be posted on a page that's all over the place. -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 05:36, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Good enough for the page with the same name. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:44, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Kee... ke... kee... ah fuck it... hic -- 01:48, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Delete. Useless ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Ban from mainspace. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:01, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Delete. -- 13:03, December 3, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:42, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Delete The execution of this reasonable idea broke my heart. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:32, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Per Lobster. Could be appropriate if the template itself weren't so bad. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:24, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Jesus fucking christ no. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • formspring) 08:23 Dec 07, 2011
Comments	Comment. You know, almost every time I see a template nommed here and someone says it should be banned from mainspace, I wonder if the exact same point can't be made as the one I made when Template:Bat Fuck Insane was nommed. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:23, 3 December 2011 Meh. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* (talk) (stalk) Π ~ ~ 06 Dec 2011 ~ 08:23 (UTC)

Score: 2
Keep (3)	Keep. Weaker material here... looks like a good starting point for a rewrite though.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:15, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep. I like this page, and am a lifelong pedo myself, so yeah, keep this cute kitten. Aleister 19:07 1-12-'11 Keep. Doesn't seem too bad. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:40, 4 December 2011
Delete (5)	Why the fuck this was kept in the first place I have no clue. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:55, November 30, 2011 (UTC) I don't know what the heck this is. If it's legitimately funny to somebody, could we at least give it a more descriptive title, so folks don't confuse it with the Nabokov book? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 16:30 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:26, December 1, 2011 (UTC) What is this? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:24, December 2, 2011 (UTC) This isn't a good article. Being a good starting point for a different article warrants this, at best, preservation in a namespace. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:51, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	143 hours without a clear majority either way? Kept it is. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:29, 6 December 2011

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Keep. This ain't bad at all-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:03, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Not deletion worthy.--Sycamore (Talk) 22:53, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:17, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Naturally, I came across quite a few awful articles while purging {{Grue}}. This is one of them. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:40, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:42, December 1, 2011 (UTC) It's not funny and that constitutes a delete in my mind. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:27, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	I will abstain for now, but I think this article is lame, at best. I despise the Raiders, and I despised Al Davis before he died (God rest his poor ragged, hated soul), but I would've liked to have seen a better article about the old bastard. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 15:25 (UTC) No consensus means no deletion. I think we can all agree on that. Or not. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:50, 5 December 2011

Score: 5
Keep (4)	Keep. I think this is a bit shitty, but I suspect that quite a few people like this.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:18, November 30, 2011 (UTC) I like this very much. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:36, 30 November 2011 I will make more funny pokemon articles.--~~Fcukman~~LOOS3R!!! 12:01, December 1, 2011 (UTC) As silly and dumb as it is, it does have what it takes to make people laugh and that's what we want right?? -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 02:04, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (9)	h8 u, stupid meme-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 14:13, November 30, 2011 (UTC) It doesn't matter what others think, you think it's stupid, so vote delete. That's how I ended up naked on a train to Ukraine. Talk! Contribs! 16:47, November 30, 2011 (UTC) DEATH TO AME- mudkipz... --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 21:28, November 30, 2011 (UTC) So I heard you like deletion -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:24, December 1, 2011 (UTC) You heard wrong! : / —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:15, 1 December 2011 As stupid as the other deleted Pokemon articles. This shouldn't get spared. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:33, December 4, 2011 (UTC) Torchic is better than Mudkip anyhow. 2K12_DAN.VRS 03:40, December 5, 2011 (UTC) Delete Unforgivably bad. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:35, December 5, 2011 (UTC) On second thought, after reading this a second time, I realized that only laughed at the meme itself and the article really is just the meme written over and over again, so Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:30, December 5, 2011 (UTC) ATTENTION: I hate to be Captain Obvious, but this article, as I'm sure EVERYBODY BUT ME knew, is nothing but a cut-and-paste of the original meme. See here. Therefore, I give my "kill" vote reason as "Unoriginal material." ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 6 '11 0:06 (UTC)
Comments	Also Leoispotter remember to tag articles you nominate with {{VFD}}, cheers:0)--Sycamore (Talk) 15:18, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Oh, whoops. I'm a bit rusty at this whole wiki thing.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:10, November 30, 2011 (UTC) This article is so incredibly stupid and retarded that I was laughing hysterically. This doesn't constitute for a keep though but considering that I laughed, I'm abstaining. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:22, December 2, 2011 (UTC)

Score: -1
Keep (5)	Keep. With the list gone, this is fine. Listicide should be the first question before bringing articles to vfd.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:07, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep Sycamore's list perversion has rescued this. Deviant! mAttlobster. (hello) 18:16, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Keep. Looks fine. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:38, 30 November 2011 Keep. could do with a little improvement, but this is in no way fit for deletion. Imnotanewb 16:02, December 1, 2011 (UTC) Keep. it has the potential to be funny if it were fixed up a bit -- $Fe^{+3} AlFe^{+2}$ 02:09, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	As the baron would say, "this is bad". Here here. --Black Flamingo 01:15, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Das ist nicht gut! Töten Sie es!!! -- Lt. Gam ma 287 02:21, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Shit list ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:18, November 30, 2011 (UTC) Not funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:16, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:42, 4 December 2011