This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Delete. Yeah, um, can we get rid of this already? We have date categories for this stuff, and besides, it's messing with special pages' results. Probably article count, too. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 02:49 Jun 11, 2011
Question since it's on-topic here. Are UnNews pages being counted into the overall article count? Thought this was one of the things people agreed on on one of the recent three dozen forums on changes to the wiki, but I can't keep track. Aleister 10:16 11-6-'11
Delete. Mistakes the use of recognizable pop culture figures in altered situations for actual humor, it's the Meet The Spartans/Family Guy syndrome. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:58, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Curiously, if you replace Larry King with George Clooney, this starts looking just a bit like an attempted mockery of Batman & Robin. --Sloublues 14:39, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
Blah. Insert actual reason from above here. Or something about randomness. Or a cake. I like cake. 1234~23:49, 10 June 2011
Delete. Clowns vs. Canadians vs. ???, overuse of Russian Reversal. It's just another wacky war story in the end. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:48, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. An article of nothing but tedious lists and filler. If you replace the word "kill" with "score" or "point" it's an exact replica of a normal sports score report. Also, count how many times the article TELLS you that what you're reading is boring.--Count of Monkey Crisco 17:00, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Looks like wikipedia -- -Big★Duck☭ 19:14, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
Pyromania ensues... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 00:40, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
I've never been a fan of these. 1234~00:48, 10 June 2011
Jarring your feces for a decade and meticulously sorting the jars by date, size and color also takes a ridiculous amount of time and effort, but no amount of effort will make you not a lunatic who stores his own poop. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:18, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
Bastards! I have been doing that for years. I was told there was a payback dammit. MrNFork you! 13:58, Jun 10
Look on the bright side, in case you need a specific type of poop you'll know exactly where to get it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:03, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
I abstain too, I agree with Sly Fox, I tend to be merciful myself for such an effort, + it made me laugh a bit even though I don't know shit about the teams and I think after some clean-up edits by someone who knows soccer, it could be good. Mattsnow 20:36, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. This one is actually quite smart. I'll add stuff later, and maybe polish it up a bit, but even now a lot of work has gone into it. Maybe Funnybony can take a look, he knows Thailand like the back of his back, and since it's set there it can include some more local jokets. Aleister 12:22 9-6-'11
p.s. I've expanded it, added pics and enlarged the storyline. It may not be feature worthy but iz maybe not VFD worthy anymore. 00:51 10-6-'11
Single use template, and it has deprecated tags apparently. Easy delete-copy-paste job. (talk)00:38, 8 June 2011
Doesn't even have the fucking Phoenix Wright picture seriously put in some damn effort. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:42, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. looks like an illogicopedia reject. --Mn-z 02:08, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
Keep It was very badly formatted so I cleaned it up a little and I actually think it has enough good ideas and I like the 'style' it's written in which work for what it is... MrNFork you! 19:37, Jun 7
Delete (1)
This appears to be missing an article. 1234~07:51, 7 June 2011
I kinda like it. It's a stub with some potential and it already has some wordplay going on. I have added more of the same, plus a section, and cleaned up the mechanics. --Sloublues 18:00, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
Keep Needs more attention, and pics but the concept is sound and it's not offensive enough to delete. MrNFork you! 19:28, Jun 7
Delete (1)
I have no idea what's going on here. 1234~07:46, 7 June 2011
Getting some fresh lupus jokes from kevillips to improve it. --Stilicho 22:48, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. see if a bit of coaching can turn this into something people will read aloud to their grandchildren. Perhaps slap a needs work tag on it. stilicho is motivated to improve it.--KevillipsэвилипсMUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:51, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
Delete.. It's good prose, but there are no jokes at all.Mattsnow 03:07, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
Ain't much to reccomend this for, except the dump. Dumpity dump for Lupus. Aleister 3:15 7-6-'11
Delete.MrNFork you! 19:26, Jun 7MrNFork you! 16:47, Jun 8
Comments
The last few edits made the article funnier, and Stilichio genuinely seems to want to improve it, so I change my vote to abstain. Mattsnow 23:49, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
Kept For now... Needs attention to meat it out a bit more still. MrNFork you! 16:47, Jun 8
Delete. Unfunny gamercruft that alternated between random, corny and about a dozen unnecessary quotes. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:10, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. This article is just really stupid. The closest thing to a joke is that the guy who played Cedric Diggory in one of the Harry Potter sequels went on to play Edward in Twilight a few years later and even that opening is handled really poorly. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:20, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
Considering the current size of UnPoetia (it's definitely its own project at this point), this is misleading at best. Not that anyone's likely to find it, considering what links to it. 1234~07:58, 5 June 2011
Per Lyrtithyia or however the name is spelled. Aleister 13:53 5-6-'11
#Just curious of the provenance of this as this work appears to be a single edit by a passing anon IP. Seems just a tad suspicious. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:19, June 5, 2011 (UTC) Should have checked the history more carefully. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:24, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
Delete Fails HTBFANJS with an unprecedented vengeance. "Prank call a known ex-child molester or ex-rapist and tell them to go rape their mother" is one example on how to 'Live Forever'. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:29, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
Forever Young! I want to be forever young... (talk)19:21, 4 June 2011
Yet again, We've got another example of a bad article I wrote a bad article as a n00b here. That's why I mooch from others and rewrite articles that are worse than this one. This was one of my worst attempts at getting an award template yet. I'm still trying to figure out why this hadn't been deleted yet... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 20:27, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. If you don't know about the subject matter of an article it's useful and educational to Google them. In this case it would not really improve the funniness of the article.--Count of Monkey Crisco 02:38, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Kind of interesting, but should be expanded and cleaned up (even the title is misspelled). And UnNews, which although not unhuffable some of them couldn be seen as the product of their time. Aleister 11:10 4-6-'11
Delete. If someone wants to "expand" or "clean up" this article - which they won't - the article doesn't need to keep on existing because there is nothing there. Jot down the title and you have the whole thing. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 22:45 Jun 05, 2011
I really like it actually. The concept itself is brilliant, because Ladysmith Black Mambazo sounds like it would be an African terrorist organization. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:45, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
Keep The idea is good... MrNFork you! 21:53, Jun 3
Per above and these three fine gents wanting it saved. Aleister 11:12 4-6-'11
Delete (6)
I ventured deep in the Uncy jungle and shot that fugly beast. It's bleeding heavily, but it's still breathing. Wat do? Reason=just totally unfunny stub. Mattsnow 22:43, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
Weak Delete. It was posted as a stub with promises of cleaning it up later. The only problem is that the user has been gone since 2007. I think it may have some vague potential as TKF says, but is anyone likely to come along and rewrite this? I am unqualified, since I have absolutely no clue what any of the content is referring to. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession).08:42 June 2, 2011 (UTC)
Not good execution, unlikely anyone with the understanding or will to do anything with it will come across it. If the idea is good, stick it on UN:REQ, perhaps? 1234~22:00, 3 June 2011
Delete. Category:Murdered people would be a valid category, a category about a valid but non-existent category is not needed. --Mn-z 12:52, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
Big brother is watching you.Template:Unperson never existed and was a fabrication perpetrated by Emmanuel Goldstein. Memories of Template:Unperson shall be corrected doubleplusgoodwise by Miniluv. -- 16:37, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. You can see that after the first sentence there's a desperate struggle for content nad a lack of decent content. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:28, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 03:26, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Title seems good, but the article is full of randomness, and is unrelated to do with the topic. -->>Hello, my name is SirLollipop, and I am Canadian! 19:01, 4 June 2011
UnNews: Autism Speaks, So Does VFD. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 20:31, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
Delete"Upon being found Bin Laden covered his manhood with his turban and tryed to escape by riding off on what appeared to be the missing horse Shergar."MrNFork you! 21:56, Jun 3
Keep Drink Up Thy Zider, Drink Up Thy Zider For Tonight We'll Merry Be We'll Knock The Milkmaids Over And Roll 'em In The Clover The Corns Half Cut And So Are We. MrNFork you! 10:49, Jun 3
Comment. Get rid of the parenthesis in the title. It looks like it was written by a jackass. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:16, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
That's part of the joke. It's called 'Broken' but with the context. Maybe then, it isn't the author who is a jackass. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:45, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
I guess this is kept, whatever it is. 1234~02:16, 5 June 2011
Keep"We must face this great new threat of ass raping monkeys by removing more rights from people in order to protect the interest of liberty, justice, and cocaine smuggling."MrNFork you! 11:52, Jun 3
Well, it does have a lot of random crap... 1234~08:16, 7 June 2011
Delete. Of all the random garbage I've seen on this site, this beyond doubt shits on them. --Frosty dah snowguycontribsKUNPLEB 07:05, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Never been any good. MrNFork you! 16:56, Jun 8
Keep. A great deal less ugly than {{AAP}}, plus it's designed to go on the talkpage of an article while still adding the article proper to the correct category. The way this template goes about doing things is a hell of a lot neater than most of the maintenance templates we have now. In fact, keep and redesign other maintenance templates to match. And then get rid of {{AAP}}, Fnoodle can do the replacements if you like. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 21:42 Jun 07, 2011
Reqimage is easier to remember than AAP? I agree about the Reqimage template looking better. Maybe use the code from this template for AAP, but keep the AAP name? Hang on. Wait. AAP is MEANT to look bad... MrNFork you! 21:57, Jun 7
I'm still supporting the merge, but I want the contents of this template kept and {{AAP}} deleted, not vice-versa. Obviously {{AAP}} would redirect to the template. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 22:04 Jun 07, 2011
Delete (4)
I suggest this be merged with {{AAP}} in some form, unless folks really want to keep it... 1234~08:10, 7 June 2011
AAP! That's the name of the template! I always forget the name of that template. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:39, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
It appears this template does not categorize the page itself, but that talk page it is placed on. While I see the reasoning behind moving maintenance templates to the talk pages, it might also result in their overuse. If, for example a {{rewrite}} is placed on 60% of the pages, it really wouldn't be helpful at that point. --Mn-z 23:59, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
Part of the point of these things is that people see them, not only so they know the articles in question could use whatever, but so they know the things exist, and that their categories exist. As folks tend not to look at the talkpages, putting them there isn't overly useful in that regard, either... 1234~06:33, 8 June 2011
Protect yourself from Bananas! Eric Idle: "And pointed sticks" John Cleese: SHUT UP! -->>Hello, my name is SirLollipop, and I am Canadian! 19:54, 7 June 2011