This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Made me laugh. And it seems like an interesting twist on a maths page, and references real world information I also found interesting. So gonna have to vote keep on this one (and then there's the duck). Aleister 12:49 27-5-'11
Keep What the fuck is the point in deleting this? How does this benefit the site? mAttlobster. (hello) 00:05, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
Strong keep. I once spent an enjoyable hour or so looking through these archives. Some of them are really fun, and I've found lots of interesting images in there. A trip thru chaos is a trip through new sections of the brain. And taking them away as a group (I notice Lyrithya, a.k.a. the sickle, didn't even suggest saving one or a few) seems like just another needless huffing. Aleister 20:37 25-5-'11
BUTT POOP!!!! keep. per 5+ established users voting to keep it and some attempt to clean up said articles. --Mn-z 11:46, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (8)
Maybe it was for lack of looking, but I really can't figure out why we actually keep these archives. I could, however, find a reason why not to... they have this tendency to accumulate categories and templates that they really shouldn't be in or have, ones, for instance, that mess up DPL such as the feature system... these should not be showing up as featured articles, and yet some of them do. Now, we could just removed those and all other offending templates and categories, but what, I ask of you, would be the point, when as a whole they have no redeeming value in the first place. Do they? 1234~08:32, 25 May 2011
Preserving the history of chaos implies order. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:57, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
Useless as all get-out (no archive page is any more amusing than looking at the current page; it's all vandalism taken to the extreme) and prone to cause technical errors. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 09:01 May 25, 2011
As per Lobster giving the best reason to delete I've ever heard. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 09:16, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. per being literally unloadable on low-end machines and messing up the rest of the site. --Mn-z 10:31, May 25, 2011 (UTC) vote change. --Mn-z 11:46, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
UUUUUGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH *lets loose a mammoth wave of a diarrhea* --Roman Dog Bird 23:48, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
When does the unwritten "five established users = keep" rule come in? Lots of people like these pages. Aleister 3:37 28-5-'11
If it's screwing stuff up get rid of it. (talk)08:24, 28 May 2011
Comments
Strong comment. Yo, keepers: got any suggestions to make these pages stop popping up in categories where they shouldn't be, such as Category:Featured? Kind of a big deal, and since you're voting to keep these piles of shit, figured you might have some suggestions. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 06:51 May 26, 2011
Couldn't someone remove the offending categories and category-adding templates? I volunteer someone who wants to keep these articles, since I don't feel like going through the mess of code. Hence my delete vote. --Mn-z 22:39, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
Fixed. Removed inappropriate "featured categorizations. I do have to admit we will need a maximum number of these things. Perhaps delete every archive above 10 is a good compromise.--Count of Monkey Crisco 16:32, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
What about the other categories? We use the things to sort stuff, you know. 1234~23:26, 27 May 2011
Most of the time the other categories are "not Safe For Work", which often applies. As for the odd random miscategorization, well if you think vandalism/example on wheels is a U.S. President or a type of candy and you click on the link in the category page you deserve what you get an learn a valuable lesson in not being stupid. If you're using categories to systematically check out every article in that category... why? If you still have problems with miscategorization on any particular page please tell me what the problem is and I will rectify it. For example if you see a page with the category "Nazis" and don't believe it's and appropriate categorization I WILL FUCKING ADD NAZIS UNTIL NAZI CONTENT IS ADEQUATE! --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:26, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comment. You could always nominate the pages for feature. That would solve the problem. In either case, just give me a few more weeks. By then I'll have cracked the code. It'sMrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 06:56, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
Abstain I really don't like voting for something dealing with 20 or so articles.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 03:32, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
Six established users want these keeped, two of us with strong keeps. It's my understanding that one of the new "rules" is a five established users rule, the five eu trump hundreds of "deletes". This looks like it's already a Keep.. And some of the problems have alredy been fixed, just tell us how to fix the rest. Aleister 11:02 28-5-'11
Kept I'm going to semi-protect them all also, which should cut down on the... Um. Vandalism. MrNFork you! 13:02, May 28
Delete. To quote a pair of people who randomly randomized the page "HEY YALL THIS AINT FUNNY I agree". Well said, vandalizing morons, well said. --Count of Monkey Crisco 05:42, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
I really, really, want to delete something right now. But I guess I'll just settle for putting a delete vote on a rather bad article. Bugger... *skulks off* 1234~08:21, 27 May 2011
When I first saw this page I thought it was one of those meta-ish pages that tries and fails to be funny. Well, this page just has a kind of echo of what tried to be funny but got swept under the rug. The closest thing to jokes now is the unfunny headings. The rest, well, it's serious but you can't take it seriously because it's so poorly written and formatted. Havig said that, put it out of its misery. --Talk!Contribs! 08:59, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 23:52, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. This article annoys the hell out of me. The first section is random. The second is incessantly grating faux Shakespearian dialougue. After that there's a lot of song parodies with word replacements that are either random or you basic adolescent genital based humor. If anyone finds a decent song parody in the list do us a favor and copy it the its own Untunes page the DELETE THIS CRAPSACK ARTICLE.--Count of Monkey Crisco 05:19, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. As much as I love Led Zeppelin, I couldn't stand reading this article. Delete it and maybe someone can make a better version of this.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 05:21, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
(Per the Count) Just WOW. I'll tell you what I mean. I looked at the page, didn't read much, read a line of two going down, schrooled onto the song lyrics which had some good ones and bad ones in a quick read, so I came to one I know the words to "Piano Man", and told myself "I'll judge the whole page on 'Piano Man'. Read it, and WOW. The lyrics are either amazing poetry metaphor and at some points genius, or I'm too high to know crap when I see it. I'm gonna copy those lyrics and put them on my catch-all page. Aleister 1:35-5-'11
Delete. A cocktail recipe with pathetic attempts at being awesome. Empty calories and no buzz. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:24, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. More like cocksucker recipe. Although that would have more humor than this article.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 03:30, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Sorry cat, I have to agree here. It'sMrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 06:50, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I was waiting for this. But yes, it`s pretty bad. Does this have nothing to do with my scele-thing? Muahahaha. And, dr., thank you from my block. Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz07:40, 26May, 2011(UTC)
Delete. Take it to Illogicopedia. --Scofield & Friends 10:12, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
The cat hates this. And her. And American Idol. And the people of American who didn`t vote for James Durbin. Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz05:06, 26May, 2011(UTC)
Delete. So... he's in a rock band? That's the joke? LAME. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:40, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. The joke is so more subtle CofMc, you didn't get it? Me neither. Mattsnow 05:09, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
I'm impressed. This is really terrible. 1234~00:00, 26 May 2011
Delete. Who came up with the idea of bunching the quotes at the top of an article? I think it was <insert name here> and I will be watching for more evidence, <insert name here>. -&---KevillipsэвилипсMUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:56, May 26, 2011 (UTC) P.S. the picture is cute even though makes no sense.
Delete. Terrible development, hardly describes the character. The entire article is an exercise in seeing how many variations the author could find on "He's ghey LOL!". Would have been better if the only content was "He's ghey LOL!" so I could QVFD it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 05:04, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. What the fuck is this? A I too old to know that character? (I am an old shit that was alive when FF7 came out) Anyways trash that shit for god's sake! Mattsnow 05:39, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. My small town is such a craphole chapter 598: Brazillian edition. Terrible grammar does not help. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:01, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Not seeing a joke here. I see more of a joke above. Not a terribly relevant one, but whatever. 1234~23:57, 25 May 2011
Delete Infinity. - LMAO but then again, I am from there, and know all the people, and boy it is spot on, but this is the English language U for the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, I am tired of those Brazilians pushing their southern humor on us. Burn it --KevillipsэвилипсMUN,CM,NS,3of7 02:34, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. The fuck does this have to do with anything? It's a full on ramble. It's also full of broken external links. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:55, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Weak Keep. Medium sized, not random two months is a very short time for an article to go idle. The joke overall is predictable clumsily executed but not quite VFD level. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:36, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)
Delete. Short, random, and hasnt been worked on since march this year. Plus its a disgrace to the delicious veggie.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 18:50, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Makes more sense after clicking on the links. It tells a story of a clown who wants to give the town an enema, then the town magicly is gone, and the clown is left wondering why the town is gone. A wonderful story, like a fairy tale. Profound logic intertwined with pathos. "Where did it go?" is man's lament through the centuries. Pity the poor fool. Huh? Aleister 13:54 24-5-'11
It's enema time! My butt hurts... -- 15:06, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)
Nil content based on an unfunny pun, yet still seems three times as long as it should be. Plus, the title is incredibly obscure, and if no one has the reason to look for it, then it should basically have no reason to exist. I would normally forgo that reason if the content was namespace or absolutely hilarious, but, y'know, "nil content based on an unfunny pun." --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 10:31, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
When this thing came here, I was thinking that does this have any secret jokes or something that I don`t just understand. I didn`t took it to QFVD. But now, here, I shall say gently and silent DIE!!!Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz06:12, 24May, 2011(UTC)
To be sure, this article is lacking in pedophilia. For that I apologize. Perhaps the subject of a good clown-on-clown colonic cleansing hits a little too close to home. I thought it was a timely subject, but if this is really the best use of your time, as a "professional", I say go for it. Just to quote someone whose comedic opinion I truly cherish, "small penis". With fiends like these, who needs, well, you've already had your fill of unfunny butt puns, so I'll leave it at that. - Imrealized...hmm? 00:26, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
I'll be blunt and just say I like your other stuff better. *shifty eyes* 1234~01:53, 23 May 2011
Taint no thing. I just thought it might be up someone's alley. It's all good in the end. - Imrealized...hmm? 02:57, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
weak keep Not a gem at all, but not that crappy, thinks I Mattsnow 03:32, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)
Delete. Almost as bad as Sheen Wars below but since it exists primarily as a support article to Sheen Wars they should meet their fate together. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:34, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. First Anti-Grue, now this? What's next, an article about Neehs? (Sheen spelled backwards, similiar to Eurg, which is grue spelled backwards). Plus, unlike Anti-Grue, this is not funny.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 15:18, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
Override, as per the recent "minimum of 24 hours for all nominations" rule. Wait for the letters to go red. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 10:30, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
I thought that was only when deleting an article. If it's clearly a keep what's the issue? MrNFork you! 10:33, May 24
0 isn't exactly a clear keep. It could only take 3 more users to put this into deletion territory. For balancedness, best to wait 24 hours for everything. Unless it's a clearly illegal nomination with -10. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 10:35, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Dude, I did read it myself. Just did not bother to vote before. I sometimes do that on VFD. It's -1 now. I would rather get stuff off VFD if it's not going to be deleted sooner rather than later. Maybe I should read the forum about this, though I can't find it right now. If anyone has a link to it, I would be grateful. I would assume that the 24 hour thing was more to stop articles getting deleted too fast, rather than this kinda thing, but it's all good... MrNFork you! 10:42, May 24
This. In there somewhere. Something about fairness and ensuring people get a chance to vote, and stuff. Patience, mon... sometimes a slew of whatevers come in later, less likely with an article like this, but general sense there are articles where that can be important, and consistency avoids double standards, which are so passé. Sa quibble. 1234~11:13, 24 May 2011
And the 24-hour rule gives people a chance to read pages which they may have missed, some of which are pretty interesting. Lyrithya noms some with VFH potential, and that's a valuable service. Aleister 13:47 24-5-'11
Delete. An airline with space shuttles and fighter jets, and has additional flights to Venus? Sounds like someone was smoking something heavy. And it's F-18 Hornets, not F-40! Sheesh.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 15:50, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete.Ahh... never though I would say something like that for a greek article but... this sucks. -- 16:14, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. The chances of this happening are about as close as Greece repaying its debts. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:17, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Losing.By late 2002 Ming the Merciless was assassinated as predicted, not by the followers of Jake and Elwood Blues, but by the followers of a secret religious cult. The sect of "Boogoodoogooloogoodoogoo" worship a giant pink rabbit, and hold midnight ceremonies according to the phases of the moon.Shit just goes on like that. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:28, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
I'd say I've cleaned out better things from between my toes, but I really haven't. At least, not that I can think of. But that's not the point. Not that it has much more of one... 1234~01:04, 24 May 2011
Delete.This money Elvis' parents used to make an operation on Elvis so he could sing nice. Because Elvis sung all the time and he sung like horsecock. The rich investor did experiments on Kjelsås, but the experiments went fatally wrong, and everyone in Kjelsås turned into cows. But he made it good again and sold Kjelsås to a computer company in 1976 called Blizzard.It just goes on like that. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:46, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I managed to read it all. Hardcore brains. Mattsnow 03:29, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Nul points..Harald Hardraada, Edvard Munch, Henrik Ibsen, Vidkun Quisling, Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, A-Ha, Anni-Frid "Frida" Lyngstad from Abba..this town took a hell of a beating...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:15, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. An article, short and bad, made in 2005 and showing its age. Don't feel worried that you might destroy some longstanding set of decade articles. There's only four entries in the decades category. --Count of Monkey Crisco 05:45, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
When you're assigned a title in the Happy Monkey competition, it's expected that your jokes are going to be a little forced. But this is just all force and no funny. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:30, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
Sad Delete This could have had so much potential.~~SirLjlego,GUN[talk] 16:35, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. The broken English is really not well done at all and the flow of the article is mostly "lol random", jumping from one place to another without even stopping to make a joke. By the time it's over you're just wondering what the hell you just read. It's really not any better than stuff that gets ICU'd every day. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 01:21 May 22, 2011
Comments
Being a featured Why? means almost as much as having Satan Approve the article. The presence of a template does not suddenly boost an article into redeemability. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 10:06, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. This is probably vanity. I can't find any analogous character on wikipedia or the web in general. It's also a long rambling epic of unfunny attempts to sound AVV3$UM!!! It just comes off as self indulgent and crufty. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:06, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. My guess this is some on-line game character adopted by the author. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:46, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
Red Links? I HATE RED LINKS *attempts to control anger*. Also, the writing of the plot was not well done, and there's a list.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 01:08, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
Poor attempt at a spork, apparently. 1234~23:52, 22 May 2011
Delete. Couldn't understand a God damn word here. Maybe if it was translated into English my vote may change as well (probaly not).--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 01:11, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
Since there is a French Uncyclopedia... well, not sure what purpose keeping this serves. For anyone who speaks french, telling them might be an option, but... eh. 1234~23:31, 22 May 2011
Comments
I went to the French Uncy and they already have an article on Quebec, better than this one. (I speak french btw) Mattsnow 01:09, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
If this gets deleted, I'll update the related template. Mattsnow 16:20, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
OK, this nom has a large back story. It all started a while ago when I came across this. It was an article about the Monster House film and, as you can see, it sucked. I took it upon myself to rewrite it immediately and soon turned it into this, the present day version. Later, I decided to check out the article history. Turns out that the article was made by a Mr Goodbar who's last edit is dated 17th August 2007 - just 12 days after his first. The only edit on his contributions list outside of Monster House was something called Never Talk to Strangers. Never Talk to Strangers was created two months before Monster House by someone named ?. ? stopped editing on the 30th of June, 2007. Putting aside the suspicious connection between ? and Mr Goodbar, it seems that the old Monster House is mainly a copycat of Never Talk to Strangers. Both the articles have Mr Bean as the movie producer, have a similar shitty MSPaint-made poster (ask Lyrithya, he/she deleted one of them!), etc. Since I don't have the time or money to fix up Never Talk to Strangers, I have realised that its true home is here.--Talk!Contribs! 13:20, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. It doesn't use its own images, but images from Meet the Robisons, too listy, and it's poorly written.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 16:00, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
I'd have settled for 'it's bad'. 1234~19:37, 21 May 2011
Delete. EpicA's investigation is worthy of an UnSherlock Holmes award. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:55, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
#Save. But for sure it should be taken out of main space by adding "Uncyclopedia:" in front of it, it's basically an inside uncy page. As for its merits, just historical, these are actual admins smackin' down in 2006 which has to be worth something on the side of historical merit.Aleister 21:15 Judgement Day. A few minutes later on Judgement Day: Never mind, I didn't look at the history. This page was written by one-eyed Jack, and not by all the admins mentioned.
Delete (7)
This is an unfunny, listy, poorly written article from 2006. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 19:11, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
IMMA STICK MAH DICK IN YO ASS! DON'T DO DAT AGAIN HONKY!!!!!!! i don't get it --Roman Dog Bird 19:47, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
As much as I'd like to smack a few admins... actually, why not? *wanders off to smack some admins* 1234~22:04, 21 May 2011
Move into OEJ's namespace. Seems just like a quote bin of his favorite banning messages. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:50, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete.Totally standard "my town is such a craphole article" with all the usual cookie cutter clichés. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:29, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete I really want to make it policy that articles of this nature are vanity, so it's OK to shoot them on sight.~~SirLjlego,GUN[talk] 06:21, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. A Pisspouri. Fails to mention Peckham Water or the Nelson Mandela Tower. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:45, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. It's one of those all too common crap articles here that plough straight into their spiel without bothering to provide any explanation or clue to what they are on about. This is just another sad example. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:41, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
KEEP Generally, old UnNews isn't deleted however bad it is. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:18, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
Lobster. Also, unlike the Ash's funeral one, this hasn't been inexplicably edited for four or so years. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:41, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)
This is just so terrible it's... er... I don't even know. 1234~08:03, 19 May 2011
Weak Delete Well, I just, it, um, er... I have no idea. I actually thought I was looking at something I should QVFD, but I figured it's not quite that bad, then I saw the date on it. I don't really get the time travel logic, but D- or F+; what's the difference? It still sucks. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession).10:49 May 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Terrible articles should be hidden in shame, not in UnNews. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:57, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
Dislike
-- 22:53, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete I don't know how you found this, exactly, and it does feel strange voting to delete an old UnNews, but I'ma do it anyway.~~SirLjlego,GUN[talk] 06:23, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
I reverted it back to the last edit by the original author. Maybe better, or at least removes the top twenty layers of random to find the core of random, which has some hope actually. Aleister 21:38 18-5-'11
It's a toilet surrounded by a whole lot of namedropping. 1234~19:26, 16 May 2011
Agreed, and the IP who wrote it in 2005 isn't coming back to improve it. pillow talk 21:01, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete I thought it might be fun and quirky. It wasn't fun and it wasn't quirky. So I leave disappointed. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:25, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Time to send this one to the shredder. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:44, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
I considered trying to remove all of the stupid, but there wasn't really anything left. Poor article, written by someone who just didn't like the game... 1234~19:33, 16 May 2011
Weak delete. It's bad, but it's arguably better than Boy Scouts of America, and part of me actually wants to delete that and redirect "Boy Scouts" to this... aw, fuck it, we don't have anything funny about boy scouts. pillow talk 20:59, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
The thing is, it's really hard to write any satire about a conservative organization that's existed since the dawn of time, and actually make it something we haven't heard a million times. The only thing I can think of is that the first Boy Scout handbooks used to say that masturbation was deadly, but I don't know if that would be original or not. Dare we include FACTS in Uncyclopedia??? Maybe truth really is stranger than fiction. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession).05:45 May 17, 2011 (UTC)
There are always ways to make things work. Some are just harder to find than others, and facts are often the hardest of all, simply because we do not think of using them. 1234~22:37, 17 May 2011
Full of unfunny, vanity, and it's certainly not an article. Don't know how this has existed for this long without being deleted, but better late than never. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK]02:35 May 16 2011
Contributes nothing, is terribly unfunny, leads to nothing but bitterness. Replace permanently with BHOP. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:37, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. I kind of like it. It needs some pictures and could maybe be a little more connected and less random with less red links. But overall I don't think it's worth dumping. I made a couple (very) minor edits. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:26, 14 May 2011
Keep. Same as above.--Talk!Contribs! 09:39, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Weaker stuff, sure. But not really deletion worthy (some good starting points etc.). Bet in half an hour you could easily make a feature of this...--Sycamore(Talk) 21:37, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
I agree. I don't think it's that bad. Needs expansion and I think maybe the end isn't quite done? But I like the pictures. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:34, 14 May 2011
Sycamore exaggerates, but it's not terrible enough for me, especially now. 1234~06:47, 15 May 2011
Too bad there are two articles about the same joke though.--Talk!Contribs! 09:56, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
The concept of this article is that explosions are cooler when you invert the colors in a picture of them. Enough said, I think. pillow talk 21:23, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Thanks for filling me in...I couldn't even figure out what the concept was. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:42, 14 May 2011
Keep. It wasn't that bad. I mean, it just needs to be cleaned up. It's either that, or this energy drink is going to my head!!! --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 21:17, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. I agree. Yes it is kind of factual but it just needs cleanup. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 14:32, 15 May 2011
Delete (3)
Actual facts about brain hemorrhages, told in an obnoxious way. Well, whoop-dee-fucking-doo. pillow talk 18:49, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. It's not the best, most original article ever, but it's not worth tossing in my opinion. Good for a few laughs. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:04, 15 May 2011
Maybe ?pedia wants it. pillow talk 18:42, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Delete."Brevity is the soul of wit." That what Shakespeare wrote once. He should have added "...so don't take a 30 second joke from Monty Python's Flying Circus and ream it our to 16 paragraphs, you tosser." --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:25, May 14, 2011 (UTC)