This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Weak Keep. It's got a concept and a few jokes, but it's a stub. I think it deserves a slight chance to expand (if anybody pays attention to it). --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 01:52, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
A pathetic little article, to be sure. pillow talk 18:55, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. foreigncruft. I know nothing whatever about Russian airlines, although one can guess that they probably suck my the standards of the developed world, and said fact isn't particularly funny. --Mn-z 16:48, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
Have never looked at this before, and I found it pretty clever, all the variations. A couple stupid quotes could be taken away, yet overall I enjoyed my visit to the page and will write about it in my diary. Aleister 14:35 15-5-'11
As a good solid reference to that film thing, it has a place here. Current article could use some massive cutting down, however. Although I forgot what the thing it's from is called... >.< 1234~19:59, 15 May 2011
Actually part of the joke is not cutting it down, but to have it long, as in the film. It goes on and on. Aleister 21:48 15-5-'11
In the film, it stays in the same languages and is amusingly formatted, getting more so as it goes. This, if anything, gets less so. 1234~22:04, 15 May 2011
WShat??? Of course in the film it stayed in the same language, that's why digressing into long sections of other languages adds satire. Def.keep the other languages, imnho. Maybe some minor pruning but not major pruning? Aleister 6:11 16-5-'11
Definitely keep! Of course anyone who didn't see the movie will think that sucks. Now, we should cut it after the English stops and other languages follow. Other languages are out of (English) Uncyclopedia's jurisdiction. Mattsnow 22:15, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
Could we NOW get a rid of this? I dont like this page. It stinks like AAAAAAAAA! Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz13:25, 15May, 2011(UTC)
What a pointless article. Anyone could take any phrase and copy it into a text box a bunch of times then use Google Translate to make it a bunch of different languages. Jack worked too hard on this article and as a result it is dull as all get out. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:19, 15 May 2011
I tried to delete some of the 128 Kb article, my PC sucks, I think the article is amazing but we can agree the other languages should be thrown out. (I tried to do it.) Mattsnow 00:05, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
Ohhhhhhhhh, ok. Didn't figure that one out. My apologies. I still definitely think it needs trimming though, especially the other languages part. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 00:36, 16 May 2011
Strangely enough, the article has been sharply pruned since before you posted that comment. Look at it again! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:38, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
It should be kept. Mattsnow 00:59, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
Abstain. Ughh... it's tedious, but it looks a lot nicer now... hell, I'll abstain. Even if I did vote delete I wouldn't have made a difference.Talk!Contribs! 15:53, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
Apparently this was written in half an hour, or so it says on the article itself. It does sort of look like it, and doesn't make much sense... 1234~08:28, 15 May 2011
It needs a lot of expanding but really it's not such a bad little idea... -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:14, 15 May 2011
I agree with snowman. Concept: 10 Current form: 0 Mattsnow 22:17, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
I actually really liked it; not only is it not deletion worthy, I think it's well above average in terms of its humor value. pillow talk 22:49, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
I suspect UN:REQ rather failed with this one. On the plus side, the links say it's still there, so... 1234~09:07, 15 May 2011
Comments
Uh, guys... it's still listed on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. That means the idea's not going anywhere; I'm just calling for the deletion of this particular attempt. Trying to play by the rules, as it were. That'll learn me. 1234~22:50, 15 May 2011
This one was apparently done in 20 minutes, although it's better than most things written the quickly would be... but it's still an unfunny list without any ideas that really follow through. 1234~08:31, 15 May 2011
why are we trolling (fishing term) archival unnews? --KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 21:54, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
The recently deleted Rectal Prolapse was linked through this. I took one look at it and decided it wasn't no good. --Roman Dog Bird 22:06, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
Also, the article sucks, and we should not keep stuff based on namespace. --Mn-z 22:07, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
My old man is a television repairman, he's got this ultimate set of tools. I can fix it. - Imrealized...hmm? 16:32, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. The bottom list is problematic. The rest has a few funny bits. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:56, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (0)
So... I'm confused, not that that's anything new. Unrelatedly, this article isn't very good. 1234~09:00, 15 May 2011
Comments
The guy in the fancy hat was correct. He could indeed fix it. O_o And since nobody else went for deletion, I'll just close this thing. 1234~23:52, 15 May 2011
With the Tennant's issue at the forefront of the issue and my double vision... the real question is whether you would want me to re-work at this time, and in my sensitive condition?--Sycamore(Talk) 19:36, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
You're pregnant?? Somebody get Mn-z! pillow talk 20:29, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Also, you might want to notify Meganew, Jupiterfox, and possibly Socky while you are at it. --Mn-z 23:38, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Many times has Mnbvcxz wanked over a pregnant Scotsman. I find both situations described troubling;)--Sycamore(Talk) 21:46, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Sycomore, you've got the Kate Bush to kick this puppy into article Nirvana. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:45, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. I think this is an amusing stub. There could be a nice staring point for a writer here.--Sycamore(Talk) 19:44, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Valid satire, competently written. Its flaws are that it's short and has no pictures, but that can be fixed. pillow talk 18:58, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. valid satire. --Mn-z 16:44, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. needs expanding but this is a good start -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:10, 15 May 2011
Comment. Looks like an attempt to parody the "Homosexual Agenda". If you don't know what that's about, look it up on conservapedia. They know all about it. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 21:44, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
I think most of this wound up in Dinosaur, at least at some point. Do we want this, too? No, seriously, do we? I'm asking. That's not rhetorical. 1234~20:09, 13 May 2011
Was all set to vote to save it, then opened the page and saw it, so now here I am, playing a banjo and voting to let my dinos go. Aleister 22:22 13-5-'11
I think it's supposed to be funny how bad it is. But really, it's just bad. And not funny. 1234~05:45, 14 May 2011
Burninate! It looks like it was written by someone who just learned swear words and can't quite figure out how to use them. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:52, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
I get the feeling someone doesn't like chicken nuggets. Or something. 1234~03:48, 14 May 2011
Delete. LOL. (Not because the article is funny; rather because I just read an Uncyclopedia article without anything even beginning to resemble funny). -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:15, 14 May 2011
Radioactive! This is worse than Chernobyl... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 18:41, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Useless people love fried highly processed chicken products LOL. --Mn-z 00:49, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
This is just bad, in so, so many ways. pillow talk 21:28, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Just not enough here... this has no future. Reckon the topic itself is just not a great place to start from.--Sycamore(Talk) 21:39, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
holy fucking shit are you kidding me --Roman Dog Bird 21:40, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
This isn't even worthy of a delete template because it's that bad. Yeah. I think I'll have some of those images QVFD'd too. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 02:30, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
It's a shame because someone obviously put a lot of time into this horrendous article...time that could have been better spent somewhere else. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:37, 14 May 2011
Just not funny or even coherent. pillow talk 21:26, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
This article is queer, and I don't just mean weird either. Can someone QVFD that badly photoshopped encyclopedia image when this gets deleted? Thank you... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 02:25, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
Blather. The hapless author asked MrN9000 if he could please take it out of the ICU, and that dirty limey didn't stand his ground. pillow talk 18:46, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. so you're okay with the concept but not the coding? It's good enough, if just barely. Better than some "looks like the thing that it's about" articles I've seen. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:23, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. As a "page that looks like its subject," it's... fine. I guess. pillow talk 18:56, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. per aboves. --Mn-z 23:40, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
It's three jpegs of what appears to be text copied from an old revision of the wikipedia page with ads over it. This could work if rendered in hypertext with an actual article behind some positioned ads, mind. 1234~19:20, 12 May 2011
Comments
It has a concept besides the ads? Damn, I deleted all those other wikipedia copypastas for nothing... 1234~01:10, 13 May 2011
I don't think it's really copied from Wikipedia. If it is, it's a heavily vandalized revision. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 00:31, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I have the oddest feeling we deleted this before. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:13, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
Radioactive! That article nearly caused my head to explode. Two lists with no content to go with it, and randomness running freely through the article made me vomit. -trap door opens- --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 18:32, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. I brighten it up with a nice picture and bam it goes of vfd. LOLLIPOP: fix this and give it sum kawk! --KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 21:40, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
Keep This is funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:41, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
Very Keep. very nice...--Sycamore(Talk) 19:42, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Thanks for pointing this out, very good page. Aleister 20:32 12-5-'11
Weak keep. I... don't entirely understand this, but nonetheless I don't entirely hate it either. pillow talk 19:00, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)
Some nutty theories are hilarious, but this just... what? 1234~19:06, 12 May 2011
Delete. Needs a lot of fixing and strengthening of the core concept. Should not get away without a fix tag. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:49, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
I dunno how much of the present stuff is savable, but Matt likes it, and since this is an article which should surely be on Uncy, maybe a few people should add to it. I'll do a few minutes, and maybe Romartus, and of course SPIKE, ah, wait, never mind. (hint, SPIKE used to live in Pakistan, had lots of free time and three wives!) Aleister 19:37 12-5-'11
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 23:45, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Please dismiss Mr. TM, Janice. I don't want him to ruin my carpet with his ignorance and stupidity. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 01:55, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. This is pretty good. Not nonsense for sure. It's a parody of the Muhammad Ali vs, "Smoking" Joe Frazier rivalry from the 1970's. Instead it replaces Joe Frazier with Frasier Crane, the self important psychologist from Cheers and the self titles spin-off show and Muhammad Ali with old Muhammad Ali and his years of compounded dementia pugilistica. It's not a strong concept at first appearance but it's developed as well as it can be with no fluff or randumbo. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:13, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (0)
This appears to be some sort of nonsense fight thingy. 1234~19:28, 12 May 2011
Comments
A great page. Only thing is it's so good I'm checking for plagerism (Playdoh put it up with one edit, complete, usually a bad sign if prior edits don't include user space edits), but can't find any by googling. Anyone else want to try to find a stolen page? The pic was taken from somewhere too, so wondering if an article is attached to the original pic. Am adding some edits to the present page, and he had a round two that I'll put back in. Aleister 20:00 12-5-'11
It had a copyright tag on it, but maybe. I've changed the telling of the fight to fit real-world data, and didn't retrieve round-two. Aleister 20:18 12-5-'11
Right, really not sure why I nominated this... 1234~01:13, 13 May 2011
Now listen up, here's the story about a little Serb who got pissed off at his ISP. So he came on Uncyclopedia and posted some porn along with an incoherent rant. pillow talk 12:30, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
In retrospect, sporking a Wikipedia article and adding as many references to anal penetration as possible was not a good strategy for writing an article. pillow talk 12:38, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
I admit I didn't read all of that. I really don't want to. 1234~23:25, 11 May 2011
Delete. gaymansex LOL!!!!11!one!11 --Mn-z 23:50, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
One time, I walked in on my roommate while he was masturbating. And that was pretty masturbatory. But it wasn't as masturbatory as Invasion of Uncyclopedia. pillow talk 12:35, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. any article that mentions uncyclopedia, or any wiki, or any website, waging war should be deleted immediately. --Mn-z 23:47, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
Better than a redlink, but should not discourage a rewrite. We should have a real article on Planned Parenthood. I'd vote "Delete" if there were something to replace it with. pillow talk 17:52, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
grrrrrrrrr *poop* --Roman Dog Bird 05:04, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
Weak keep A weak smile occured. Mattsnow 11:22, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
kiep when you want too take way this page you show you hate god n are bad person. Godd will cough on you when you dye so dont try to take cough midicene with you. Alstir 11:53 11-5-'11 loook theres tree levens
Keep Our 60 year old earth needs it. This is not saying Christians are stupid just that the more fundementalist stop using their brains when observation disagrees with their location based beliefs. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:36, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
By George, I think Matt's got it! Thanks for a good post and insight. Maybe I'll go back and work on it some more (started by the 92 vandal, then I and others added to it (the 92 vandal and I actually have a feature together!). Aleister 14:38
Delete. I'm a Christian, and I can still type. Yes, I get the purpose, but anything written this badly (even on purpose) should be deleted for lack of proper syntax and grammar. The Grammar Nazi hath spoken! --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 01:48, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
If you're going to go around trying to delete funny articles that people have spend a lot of effort on, don't cry the victim when someone tells you to fuck off! mAttlobster. (hello) 14:38, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
Will you kindly stop telling people to fuck off for voicing their opinions? If they don't find something funny, they don't find it funny, but if enough other people like it, it'll still get kept, anyhow. 1234~16:47, 11 May 2011
You're taking the morale high-ground on VFD? You're one of the worst. In fact if you look back through my history, I'm not exactly blameless either. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:33, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
What has morale got to do with this? Although I'll have you know I'm of particularly low morale; I'm a very unhappy person. 1234~18:48, 11 May 2011
That was such a bad spelling mistake, I concede defeat. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:54, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
It seems I overstepped a boundary. My apologies if my words were offensive; I didn't mean to give rise to any hard feelings. I never took your words as offensive (no one is supposed to take anything seriously here), I always think of this sort of thing as a kind of facetiously sporting jest. Kind of like a back and forth of "You suck." ... "No, you suck!" ... "No, you suck!" and then we all laugh about it and go for ice cream.
As for the article, I simply don't see the humor in it. Still, since a super-majority is required to have something deleted (and I'm clearly in the minority), my vote here won't affect anything; and rightfully so. I agree that if enough people find an article decent, it should be kept. I really wouldn't want it any other way.
Calling a game a torture device might work, but this is just boring. The image is probably the best thing it has, which has apparently nothing to do with the rest of it. 1234~03:05, 10 May 2011
Delete. Linked to the Richard Garfield article. Seems to have no connection to the mathematician of the same name. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:00, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
Have any of you actually played this game? I'm just wondering because I think it's great. No, seriously. Not the article, the actual game. The article isn't at all funny and doesn't even begin to do the game justice. The pictures are like movement cards from the game, but obviously they have different things photoshopped onto them. So yes, delete it, but delete it with a little bit of knowledge about the game and realizing that, if done correctly, an Uncyclopedia page about this game COULD be as good as the Stratego article. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2011
Delete. Apparently authored by someone who wanted to write an Uncyclopedia article but had literally nothing to write about. pillow talk 23:50, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. You know those articles where people write about some city and just clumsily say that it's a shithole? Well, this is one of them. pillow talk 23:47, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Could probably be done better, but meh - I can't be fucked, can anyone else? I'm surprised it wasn't huffed ages ago, really. Rabbi TechnokvetchContribsFOXES 17:17, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
I'm going to be sorely disappointed with Uncyclopedia is this actually gets deleted. Google "Jewish Problem" for some context, and if you want your search history to brand you as a neo-nazi. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 03:58, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
Okay, I'll change my vote to Abstain. I was thinking about this, and I figure it's actually quite well written. It just needs more... funny. And it needs to make sense to non-math majors. I'm not qualified, as I've studied far too much liberal arts to make sense of those equations. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession).04:14 May 10, 2011 (UTC)
Does it really need to make sense to non-math types? I don't find Geology funny but it gets a lot of traffic and appreciation from geologists. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:35, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
When I first found this from clicking the Random Page-thing, I tough that this is about a channel. But all I can see, is a small introduction about the channel, and the rest of it is pictures about fishes. Eh? Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz14:57, 9May, 2011(UTC)
Delete, but it makes me sad doing s...Order now for our crazy price of just $400,000,000,000 plus postage and handling.OK, kill that motherfucker.--Talk!Contribs! 17:01, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I read the first twenty words or so before thinking, "Ah. It's that sort of article." Kill. Rabbi TechnokvetchContribsFOXES 17:25, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
But don't you have to add the {{VFD}} tag or else the vote doesn't count?--Talk!Contribs! 17:01, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
Yes. I'm too lazy to close this thing, though, so I added it myself and reset the timer. *shifty eyes* 1234~18:18, 9 May 2011
Oh shit. So I forgot it again. Cat the Colourful is very sorry Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz04:56, 10May, 2011(UTC)
would it help to move it to a new page called Channel 31 Fish Cam? I wrote the article about the off-air program the channel used to show... like when some channels go off air they had a white dot, or some showed a test pattern, some even show a weather chart etc... well Channel 31 would show a fish tank, it was a live feed at first, till people complained, and they often just had a fish tank with no fish and other times dead fish would often be floating around for hours, and you'd see it again the next night when they replayed the exact same footage... they only seemed to update the footage to a new fish tank every 2 weeks or so [info here]. So thats more what this article was about... I could write more about C31 if given the chance, but if it really bothers you so much that deletion is a must, so be it.---Maniac1075Complain Here 02:48, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Another one of those X is the primal force of the universe things that's mostly random junk and memes. It's alos the power behing Hitler, Oscar Wilde AND Chuck Norris. Reminiscent of Weaselpudge and the like. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:37, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. All you need to know this is going to be a crap read is contained in the first paragraph. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:12, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
Weak keep It's kind of amusing if you look it as a brochure written by someone who doesn't know what they're talking about. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 01:25, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)
Baleete Not badly written, but not funny either. Mattsnow 07:30, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Just your everyday sort of unfunnystupidbad article. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:20, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
Maybe it's just me, but I don't see any jokes. It's not funny at all. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 19:32, May 9, 2011
Kill or {{fix}}, but that would probably kill it too. 1234~17:55, 10 May 2011
Keep. It's not too bad up to the nonsense about the Third Solar System War. I might be interested in attempting a revision. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 19:36, 9 May 2011
Keep. Per DeathBySnowman wanting to breath LifeBySnowman into the page. Aleister 00:05 10-5-'11
Keep Chuck Norris is awesome! mAttlobster. (hello) 16:16, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
I could write something better. I doubt I ever will, but I could, and that's saying something, considering how awful I tend to be at it. 1234~22:31, 8 May 2011
Radioactive! I only found one joke in that entire page. This is a pitiful disgrace... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 11:28, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. It's a hard subject to write about and it sort of works at first. That mini wacky war bit really drags it down though. I'm undecided. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:49, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
Aerošrot
Weak Keep. It's got a concept and a few jokes, but it's a stub. I think it deserves a slight chance to expand (if anybody pays attention to it). --
Delete. foreigncruft. I know nothing whatever about Russian airlines, although one can guess that they probably suck my the standards of the developed world, and said fact isn't particularly funny. --
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
Abstain. Ughh... it's tedious, but it looks a lot nicer now... hell, I'll abstain. Even if I did vote delete I wouldn't have made a difference.
Obliterate. What is this?? -- 
Burninate!
Irradiate.
Comment. What is this trying to parody? Some postwar law committee of some sort? HUAC? I don't get it. I could change my vote if someone can explain the joke here. -- 
WTF? BFD! -- 
Strong keep. Oh my God, this is great. I'll do some work on it. Thanks for finding it. 
That was easy.
Meh. It's in a rather sad state, and it's just begging to be killed off. Still, the quality of the writing itself makes me think it passes with a D-, so... -- 
