This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
I was walking down the street and people were pointing at me laughing. "He's the one who hasn't voted delete on 'Fly (insect)'" I heard one of them whisper. So here I am.[1]mAttlobster. (hello) 15:47, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Before I begin my eight months of hibernation, I just need to nominate this. Talk!Contribs! 17:19, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Opportunities to improve the wording--or just correct it--occurred as I read this article, but its only point is to document the lion's coming-out as a gay cartoon character: Trite. If anyone is thinking about saving this, first kill the list of "people he's slept with." Spıke¬ 17:31 26-Apr-11
Burninate! I had a cat once who was nicknamed "Snagglepuss." When I got him, they said he was a girl. It was a few months before the vet alerted me that he was actually a male. He acted so much like a girl though, I always thought of him as the world's first transgendered cat. Sadly, he passed away this year, and this article dishonors his memory. Also, it's dumb; I've wanted to VFD this for a long time. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 19:50, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
That's just ugly. And bad. And badly written. And stuff. But more importantly, it's ugly. 1234~01:34, 27 April 2011
Delete. Clark Gable and Snagglepuss. Yes..I saw no connection whatsoever. Crap random article of the month (so far). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:47, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
Obliterate. It's a made up place, based on a non-notable place and Bondo'd together with blatant nonsense filler. I dredged through the entire article (as well as its history) and found no evidence of funny. Looks like someone's got a vendetta against the actual place. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 01:47, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. It starts off OK but it has nowhere to go. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:12, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Dittoes to TheSlyFox, except "the actual place" is not the actual place. The suburban social-work building five miles south of the Michigan capital is not a police department. But it seems that people are working out their animus against their department by documenting it in a fictional encyclopedia about a fictional PD. Spıke¬ 02:28 26-Apr-11
Tedious... or so it strikes me. 1234~01:39, 27 April 2011
Delete. It's as if it's trying to get something off of its chest, but it's not quite succeeding. Maybe if it's put out of its misery, it can reflect on itself.--KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:59, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Aaaand you forgot the {{VFD}} tag, and nobody else noticed... whooohoo! Go us! Someone should, like, renominate it and do it right this time. 1234~05:48, 27 April 2011
Merge I get it, reversal humor is a classic style, dating at least back to 1968. But I say tack it onto the London Underground, or maybe Streetcar or something. I think its a cute idea. But what the heck is TFL? --KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 19:36, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Needs a tidy up but should be kept. TFL=Transport for London. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:08, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. I think it's sorta funny. I agree, needs work. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 20:25, 25 April 2011
Keep, not a bad little page as some sign says. And I know for two facts that SPIKE is a U.S.A.'er, and thus is biased against the Overground. Yankee clipper! Aleister 22:40 25-4-'11
Delete. I just don't think this deserves to live. You?--Talk!Contribs! 14:32, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. We have an adequate London Underground. What does this article do, except appeal to people who want page names to cater to a sort of Russian Reversal? What is TFL? What is the point, except that government construction projects are useless and finish late, which needs actual cleverness to not be trite? Spıke¬ 17:28 25-Apr-11
Comments
Comment. Added a couple of images. Not brilliant but I think it can be kept out of the furnace. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:39, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. The article's entertaining digression into Nuclear subs and Nuclear family is not done with skill--indeed, nothing is done with skill--but is a symptom of trying to throw the kitchen sink at this article, including quotes, templates, a section after the end, and an audio I'm not going to listen to to see if it's relevant. Should have stuck with its original theme: A revolutionary new cleaner that can eradicate any stains (by obliterating the thing they are on). If you want to save this, it won't suffice to just prune it. Spıke¬ 13:10 24-Apr-11
Keep. Despite using staples of triteness such as nonsense numbers, red-links, and bird poo, this is a real article about a real singer, and much of the humor is based on real ridiculousness, such as Welsh-ness. Do kill the Discography. Spıke¬ 02:51 23-Apr-11
Aw shucks - Despite going overboard on the multiple key repeats. Obviously a lot of work went into creating this wacky world of Duffy. I think with a little TLC to make it a bit more of the accepted style to which it aspires and we could have some first rate topics for slash fiction. --KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:58, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)
Delete. Thick with nonsense and musiciancruft but with very little actual humor. It feels like a drag to read, not a joy. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:01, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
No. Don't you get the feeling that it could have been so good?--Talk!Contribs! 14:13, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. The red-link suggests that this piece of 2005-cruft was to be the forerunner of a set of nonsense nations connected only by Wacky War pages. Spıke¬ 17:25 25-Apr-11
Delete. Ummmm....ok? It could have been good only...not. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 20:11 25 April 2011
Delete. Apart from greeting the reader with Russian Reversal and a blurry photo of two women wrassling on the lawn, the half-true bio must have been written with someone specific in mind. Apart from such cyber-bullying, it has no point. Spıke¬ 17:41 23-Apr-11
Right... this is... uh, lovely. 1234~17:49, 23 April 2011
Oh, the humanity... Talk!Contribs! 18:41, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! quickly before the subject of this article reads it and comes after us for not doing it quickly enough! --KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:46, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I don't think anything needs to be said. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:05, 23 April 2011
"he has high qualms for attempting to replace family members if they are raped with the person who raped them" Stub should have been QVFD'd. Spıke¬ 17:42 23-Apr-11
Yes, I do see it now--and I don't see a VFD. Invalid nom; but Frosty was too charitable in tagging (and protecting) a single paragraph typed by an Anon who has done nothing else here. Should have been taken straight to QVFD. Spıke¬ 13:04 24-Apr-11
Delete. Sub page to JNNN TV Anda, which was deleted in October because it was borderline vanity. This is the sdame, but uglier.--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:17, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Template: "This page was designed to offend." Worked! but I prefer pages that are designed to amuse. Spıke¬ 01:31 23-Apr-11
Yes. Although I was under the impression subpages of deleted pages were usually deleted outright upon being found, regardless of prior nominations... anyhow, what's this one doing on that template? 1234~01:41, 23 April 2011
EXTERMINATE!I read JNNN TV Anda/Homepage, and all I got was this lousy seizure. --KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:53, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
DESTRUCT!!!!personal attack DETECTED!!!!. --Fcukman 14:39, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I am tired of LOL as I am sure that no one is actually Laughing Out Loud or least of all Rolling On The Floor but is using these acronyms because she should be, she wants me to think she is, etc. So an article trying to develop an LOL culture is trite before it begins, even if it weren't preachy and didn't use Section 4 to pat itself on the back for being good enough to induce a "Lolgasm." Did I mention nonsense year number and psuedo-science? Spıke¬ 00:34 23-Apr-11
Delete. - Its like I know it wants to be funny, but misses that glistening drop of something. It pains me, but all in all, to me a gasm suggests something a bit more. --KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:50, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Contains no animated pictures of women squirting after profuse amounts of laughter. A waste of time. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:52, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
NOT GOOD ENOUGH! *cracks whip* --Scofield 16:04, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Agree with kevillips. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2011
Not even really an article, no concept and confusing to boot. (talk)04:31, 22 April 2011
Sorry man, but there really isn't any body of text here to establish concept, let alone humour. It's just just some rather unfunny and nonsensical dialogue. 1234~05:39, 22 April 2011
I agree with the person who wrote this article that Sid the Kid is a wimp, BUT this article (not even really an article) is not funny and doesn't even really make sense. -DeathBySnowman (talk)18:21, 22 April 2011
I like the title... but that's it. --BlackFlamingo 22:59, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Ice hockey is like European football not just in whining and crying but in performing "flops" to induce a penalty call. This is a fine subject for satire, but involving more than just scripts of two anecdotes. Spıke¬ 00:36 23-Apr-11
Delete. This poor article has been rescued by the shelter for unwanted articles, it doesn't need to be in any mean old main space. --KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 06:01, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Once again VFD faces one of its classic archrivals: ducks. There's just no concept on which to build anything.--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:17, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Dittos. Also: Nonsense year numbers (including 1337, of course), and "contrary to popular belief," an encyclopedia cliché. All of it having no point. Spıke¬ 01:29 22-Apr-11
While dry prose can make for wonderful funny reads, the content itself still needs to be funny. This... isn't. 1234~19:36, 18 April 2011
Delete. As the site's VP for Dry Prose, dry is not the problem with this prose. Juvenile is the problem. Spıke¬ 23:47 18-Apr-11
Delete. Has a few interesting flashes like Homework is the deadly enemy of Kid Power but the article looks half arsed at best. The writer of the article was only here for a couple of hours before vanishing so there is no likely hood it will get improved. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:02, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
It has a couple good bits and it could have been a great article, but it's not funny at all. -DeathBySnowman (talk)18:25, 22 April 2011
Delete. Who knew that "penai" was the irregular plural of penis? How many more random, dumb, penis articles do we need? Creator went away two years ago. Spıke¬ 19:37 20-Apr-11
Interesting... in my professional medical opinion, this is... stupid. 1234~02:34, 21 April 2011
Not funny When I was serving my third tour of duty in 'Nam I lost some good friends at Penai. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:33, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
Propane! Starts of with a rather crass concept, deviates towards randumbo, and then returns to call penai....parasites? Ew... --Scofield 09:40, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
From the review: "The humour is based off the article being written (deliberately?) as non-sensical gibberish. This can be funny, but possibly gets close to the line of 'don't be stupid.'" 1234~19:11, 20 April 2011
Delete. Okay, I get the pun; if you can "do" drugs, one must be able to "undo" them. Only, the page goes in an altogether different direction. It is HowTo:Do random self-destructive things. Spıke¬ 19:40 20-Apr-11
Worth a chuckle, and as far as categories go that's above and beyond the call of duty. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:28, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
Keep This is exactly the type of categories that should be on Uncyclopedia. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:04, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. I'm surprised this didn't become an in-joke or something. --Scofield 16:06, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
Keep this stupid category because it's so stupid. Even nomming it, or voting for or against it, is ultimately stupid. The category is just stupid. But maybe funny too, if you get this sort of humour. Only a little though. Aleister 1:33 19-4-'11
Keep. Per above. Not everything has to make sense to be funny. The whole point is that it doesn't make sense. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 01:53, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)
I kind of like this, except it's stupid and has nothing in it, so instead of disposing of it outright, I brought it here so y'all might see it too and do whatever you feel inclined to it. Or not. You may now proceed to lynch me. 1234~05:17, 18 April 2011
Delete. Category that doesn't categorize. All Uncyclopedia pages belong in it. Or not. Spıke¬ 10:53 18-Apr-11
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 23:12, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
You guys suck, voting keep and then not even putting anything more sensible in the category... 1234~16:04, 18 April 2011
You suck with this dumb-fuck nomination. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:15, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
But you suck because there are things to suck on, and you've found them. Aleister 16:22 18-4-'11
I'm sorry. I'll just qvfd the next one. 1234~17:02, 18 April 2011
I guess that'll solve the problem of your thoughtless nominations being held to account. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:07, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
We'll lose some good categories, though. 1234~17:08, 18 April 2011
You just do whatever you think will get you the most attention, I'm not wasting my time feeding your ego anymore. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:11, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
But it's very fragile! It needs your love, man... you're killing me. 1234~18:30, 18 April 2011
STOP VOTING TO KEEP STUPID CATEGORIES! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:51, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
THIS IS NOT A STUPID CATEGORY! --Scofield 19:55, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
Rewritten I removed the red links, rewrote the "Operations" section, and removed that confusing bit at the end. Any of you ready to flip now? --Scofield 16:29, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
It's empty. The entire article is just a bunch of different ways of pointing that out. 1234~04:46, 18 April 2011
Delete. That is not the article's problem, but that it is proudly hard to read. Spıke¬ 10:44 18-Apr-11
Comments
Comment. Just a comment while I deliberate: I read somewhere that Windows actually has an astronomical, but finite number of files it can hold in a drive's table of contents. So making infinite New Text Docs would eventually crash the machine, making the best part of this article complete nonsense. I'm sure Spike knows what I'm talking about. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 05:52, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
That the only real thing it is saying might be untrue is also not the article's problem. Spıke¬ 10:44 18-Apr-11
A few minutes ago sannse asked me to take a look at this article, because Wikia has been getting complaints that it is slander from the Yogen Fruz company. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 01:36, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Sadly, I created the article. I wasn't trying to be anti semetic, as I am a quarter Jewish myself. But delete it if you like. --Lollipop-CONTRIBS-WRITINGS-SHOP-Now adopting! - 01:54, 22 April 2011
I dunno about slander or any of that or whatnot, but I'll agree that is it is pretty offensive in how... well, how bad it is. Seriously, I'm offended. Can we delete it now? 1234~01:55, 22 April 2011
Delete. Playing word games on the name of an ethnic group doesn't mean you hate all its members. The company presumably objects to the use of its logo, the assertion in the caption that there is something evil about it, and the association with Hitler; this I consider closer to "fair use" than slander, but agree there is an issue. The story takes a single pun to gruesome extremes, not unfunny but not compelling. Given that the author assents, let's kill it. I did not run it on the Front Page; I did add it to {{RecentUnNews}}. Spıke¬ 02:20 22-Apr-11
Delete. Actually, it would become fairer use if it had been sufficiently modified to actually say "Frogen Yues" or however it's spelled. Then it would be a derivative parody, not exactly the original. Normally, I would say change or delete the logo instead of giving in to a corporation, but this article really isn't up to par. Since Lollipop has no objections, we should just get rid of it. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 03:24, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Just for the record, this is not something we are saying has to go, just asking you to look at... is it funny enough to justify keeping? pleaseandthankyou. -- sannse (talk) 01:39, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
Oh, and also "offensive and anti-semitic", not "slander" ... but my feeling is that it is much worse than that: "unfunny" -- sannse (talk) 01:41, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
FYI, the last time someone from the real world protested about his organization's treatment in UnNews (the Reverend Zim ulator presiding), a new Letters to the Editor feature was created, the protest was reprinted in full, and it was responded to by verbally severing the flack's testicles and shoving them in his mouth. Spıke¬ 02:41 22-Apr-11
And who can forget, especially those of us who weren't here at the time, the John Scherer episode. Feature. John Scherer, I mean, not Frozen Jews. Aleister Frogen Juden 3:12 22-4-'11
If random were funny, Lyrithya. But dealing with the British sports pundit with suggestions of beastiality [sic] and other sexual innuendo, isn't. Wikipedia shows that Atkinson is a repeat offender of the biggest crime in broadcasting: assuming the microphone is ever off; another case where reality is funnier than an Uncyclopedia article. Spıke¬ 19:47 20-Apr-11
Random is inherently plural? 1234~02:27, 21 April 2011
Delete. Not good enough to keep though the incident did kill Atkinson's career as a TV pundit and writing for the liberal/left leaning Guardian newspaper. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:10, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Strange article. Something meant for wikipedia but got on the wrong train and ended up here? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:21, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Tedium is its point. Finnish Air Force spends World War II proudly renaming squadrons and re-sewing uniform badges. It is only the line that the Squadron may or may not have been the inspiration for Top Gun that suggests that the author really can't do humor. Spıke¬ 11:01 18-Apr-11