This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
This was kept in the beginning of 2006, mostly on account of being relatively well-written. It's still not funny as well as downright random. 1234~18:44, 18 April 2011
Yeesh Add a redlink tag if this is kept. (talk)19:05, 18 April 2011
Delete. An attempt to morph the Keebler elf of cookie manufacturing into--what? Elvish war, Lord-of-the-Rings style? Corporate intrigue? This guy is not a bad writer, but there is no theme here, just a manic attempt to refer to the most Great Ideas possible. Spıke¬ 20:13 18-Apr-11
Reptitive pages are odd. It was funny first time, but once the craziness wears off, they're all just more copies, and this is just another copy as well, not even an overly crazy one; one with Hs. Ironically, considering what the Hs are used for, it isn't funny at all. 1234~00:00, 18 April 2011
Notice how some of them are actually about something and justified in their existence. Notice how some of them aren't, and how they usually actually devalue the other ones. This isn't the first of such articles to be taken to VFD, however, and and will not be the last (several of these should at least be considered as well, and who knows about others not so easily findable), as such articles avoid both the need for any actual writing ability or content or even effort, as well as often the need for a concept at all. It's usually a way out of writing a real article, and when it's not, how does one tell amidst the slop of the others? 1234~16:42, 18 April 2011
The only grasp at humour here is a case of saying the opposite of what's so, which really doesn't work here. Not that there's much content in the first place. 1234~16:04, 18 April 2011
Delete. No so bad anymore. (talk)17:03, 18 April 2011
Comment. Removed some of the rubbish with a minor re-rewrite. It's still not very good but might be ok as a space filler until something a lot better comes along. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:19, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
I wish more minor rewrites were so... er... majorish. Ish. Anyhow, this is kept, then. 1234~02:21, 21 April 2011
Keep. What little content there is is not bad. Could benefit more from an expansion than a deletion. Trim the list, slap a stub and rewrite tag on it and throw it back into the lake. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:21, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
The Wikipedia article has so many hooks that are better than our article's mini-rant against American Manifest Destiny: The contest's concessions to political correctness, the attempt to avoid the term "beauty contest," the addition of scholarly contests at which the contestants are inept, much as Playboy has text articles (or so I am told). This could be fun. Spıke¬ 11:10 18-Apr-11
Keep per Socky. I enlarged the pic and find the code things funny as the text of the article. Aleister 23:20 18-4-'11
Keep. If we delete it, the terrorists win. --Mn-z 23:41, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
better than those pansy ass Christians. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:00, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
Weak keep The image is good, but the coded instructions, while having potential, are just indecipherable in their current form. Somebody should work on them. --Scofield 15:06, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)
It has a good title, but the execution is just a bunch of code snippets, which aren't even that funny, nor an article. 1234~16:50, 18 April 2011
Apparently Konami is a company that makes games and whatnot. I never would have figured that out from this, which is, quite frankly, just plain bad writing. 1234~18:51, 18 April 2011
Delete. Cryptic and un-English. Spıke¬ 20:15 18-Apr-11
Burninate! It's a play on Hideo Kojima, the game director at Konami who created the Metal Gear series. But this article makes no use of its potential as a game parody, choosing the randumbo road instead. The only mention of the game is an afterthought, and doesn't even get its facts right (Hideo is a first name, not a last name). -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 22:54, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Probably written in another language and then squirted through Google Translator. End product=Pants. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:30, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
The notion here has been implemented in the main article on that shooty thingy; the guy really doesn't need his own article, at least not when so poorly implemented as this. 1234~18:57, 18 April 2011
The original HAHAHA before Maniac Lollipop moved it, this... has an idea, one that lasts all of a sentence. The rest is just cruft. Lists... of cruft. 1234~00:00, 18 April 2011
Delete. The best joke is that the company is run by Hitler. Dreary, ugly little article. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:55, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. "Wizet is the company that created Maplestory!" And, apart from the South Korean game studio's acquisition (by Hitler), the rest of the article is totally random. Spıke¬ 19:07 17-Apr-11
Keep. Yes it is funny. I'll mince a few words. Spıke¬ 00:45 18-Apr-11
Keep Any article that gets the Spikester mincing has got to get a 'keep'. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:35, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
Keep on the 'some BS is better than no BS' policy. Give Spike a chance. I added a picture. It could use some current picture too.--Funnybony 09:24, Apr 18
Keep I found some funny! And when I pulled on its tail it turned out to be Funnybony and SPIKE! Aleister 15:15 18-4-'11
My copy-edit has been entirely overtaken by FB's rewrite; give credit where due. Spıke¬ 15:35 18-Apr-11
Sink in the deep part of the ocean No funny found. I looked for it, and saw it not. Aleister 1:04 18-4-'11
Comments
Although originally not my page I did a load of work to try and salvage and improve. I think it's okay now. Perhaps Aleister can fluff it out.--Funnybony 14:20, Apr 18
It's a... decorated search inputbox with nothing else about it. It also had a the main page div close inside of a table inside of said div. 1234~07:20, 18 April 2011
Delete. Even giving it points for novelty, it doesn't even try to be funny except that certain buttons send the user to a random page or to a page with a "funny" title. Spıke¬ 10:59 18-Apr-11
This has a notion, but I'm afraid it never really made it into the article. Save for a small hint at the end... alas, UU's review was never put to use, ironically. 1234~16:08, 18 April 2011
Very Keep This is a great and funny page, I laughed several times first time thru. Then I've edited and added, scrubbed and polished, with tweaks mostly, and will enlarge the story later using the same language structure and beat, which I find really well done in its own simple way. Does anyone know why the caption in the first pic isn't showing up? A mystery. As for the page, please have three other looks. Thanks. Aleister 10:47 17-4-'11
Keep Rapped in chains. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:07, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. If the almost nonexistent development of the premise doesn't get to you the not-quite-English grammar and MS paint will. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:52, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Aleister has been here? Little evidence; the page remains a pre-teen fable that serves as a vehicle for a list containing "Rape, Sleeping, Rioting, Eating." Spıke¬ 12:24 17-Apr-11
Hello, Mr. Crabby Appleton, I'z'd said I'll get to it later, and even later than that. Things to do, people to see. And what's wrong with rape, sleeping, rioting and eating? Don't knock it till you've tried it. And as a short page it still isn't bad. Aleister 14:35 17-4-'11 p.s. Did a little more stuff. It seems a good length, with just some tweaks and plinks to sail the boat towards the waterfall. 18:27 17-4-'11
Comments
It is a Rule of Thumb both for Uncyclopedia articles and instrumental jazz pieces, that the longer the title, the crappier the piece. Spıke¬ 12:26 17-Apr-11
Granted, Aleister's version is much better than the original, but the concept itself seems to have crawled out of a rock that sat at the foot of Mt. Doom... The only thing that can save this is a complete rewrite. The MS Paint pictures really need to go, too. Until then, we should probably userspace it. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 22:26, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. And I thought the point of saving a VFD page was to improve it, and if it is much better now, maybe it shouldn't be VFD worthy any longer, which is the point, no? I dunno. Aleister 00:53 18-4-'11
I just examined it closely and I think it actually could be made into something worthwhile. It's certainly on the right track. I have an idea: instead of 2015 or some future year, how about we make it into a parody of the second Terminator film? "In 1995, the Sun left our galaxy, leaving behind a dead shell of the planet that only Satan would want..." but it didn't really happen because Johnny Conman managed to reverse the course of history. Or something. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 01:58, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
"Although to be Honest, I Doubt the ESRB would bother to examine more than 15% of the game." And you'll forgive me for not reading more than 15% of this article. Spıke¬ 11:40 17-Apr-11
Delete. Another gem by "Brown Windsor". As soon as something that looks like relevant content rears its head words disintegrate into chaos. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:09, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
just stick penuses and carrot up each other buttock And that's about it. Bonus points for using the same image three times. Spıke¬ 15:26 16-Apr-11
Delete.An almost totally undeveloped stub about a movie which does not exist. There was a film called The Fireman with Charlie Chaplain but this has nothing to do with it. Can ANYONE explain this? --Count of Monkey Crisco 14:55, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I see no point and don't get the "humor." Huffing it is easier than editing it to remove the Category:Brown Windsor. Spıke¬ 15:32 16-Apr-11
Brad is a random list of things Brad is. 1234~06:49, 17 April 2011
Delete. Even my very low bar does not understand this stream of consciousness set of in jokes, so in they are inside the writer's own head, such that they never got out. This stream is a torrent worthy of Sweden shutting it down. --KevilLipsMUN,CM,NS,3of7 07:31, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete.To make a funny article about The Powerpuff Girls all you have to do is add semen, rape and more semen.:FALSE --Count of Monkey Crisco 14:29, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Has a definite comedy theme: Cum. Spıke¬ 14:45 16-Apr-11
Delete. What do these unrelated subjects have in common so that they deserve a shared category? They're all have contributions by user:Brown Windsor. This is neither something to be proud of nor is it the right way to use categories. Categories are not for vanity tagging your articles.--Count of Monkey Crisco 14:59, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Hear hear. Mhaille also warned him about our vanity policy on his talk page. Spıke¬ 15:25 16-Apr-11
Don't be fooled by its even shorter length; I can assure you that my rewrite is much, much better. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 08:49, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
The rewrite makes it an acceptable stub. --Scofield 10:51, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
Weak keep. Froggy improved it; I added other changes to relate the joke to No Child Left Behind. Am still not sure we need a stub on an 11-year-old U.S. law. Spıke¬ 13:18 15-Apr-11
Delete.: Short, unfunny, outdated and left alone since 2008. Time it got deleted. - Frosty dah snowguycontribsKUNPLEB 03:46, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
Advocacy. The comedy concept is to take No Child Left Behind, the slogany name of George W. Bush's Y2K education law, and fit it to the wave of illegal Mexicans. To make this funny, you'd have to take the specifics of Bush's law, such as mandated testing and declaring entire local school systems deficient, and invent equivalents on the immigration question. It could be done, but this writer simply has a list of gripes against illegals (who often avoid the costs that citizens pay) and against Bush (who was not conservative enough for some people). The gripes are real but the article is a fanciful but angry manifesto using the fantasy that the unfairness was deliberate. If submitted to UnNews, it would get an immediate "mercy-move" to userspace. Spıke¬ 04:32 15-Apr-11
Comments
Meh, the re-write is better than the original shit. But I still am not moved on the over all feel of the article. - Frosty dah snowguycontribsKUNPLEB 08:59, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. The listcruft needs to go, now; don't we have consensus on lame one-line puns of song/album titles? The rest of the article is real humor on a real subject. It would be improved by poking fun at the actual career of the Beatles rather than saying random things, but there are several people here who can make that happen. Aleister, Funnybony, VFH is calling! Spıke¬ 13:25 15-Apr-11
Keep. The entire textual content needs to be rewritten, but the pictures are hilarious (except that "Beatless" one, WTF?). If someone doesn't step forward to rewrite it, I say we either slap a hard rewrite tag on it, or cut it down to a stub. It wouldn't be too hard to make it feature-worthy. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 21:35, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
Keep Stupid nomination: Hopefully your last. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:47, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
I dare you to read this and not vote "delete". Pathetically unfunny and random. --Scofield 09:34, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Matt lobster what do you mean by "hopefully my last"? For, as I remember, my last nom was for Avril Lavigne, which was successful even. Please vote on articles, not on people. --Scofield 11:36, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
Stop making stupid nominations. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:52, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. This one seems fine (and has no VFD tag either 6 hours in), as it's a fully developed concept with some creative pics and lines. The Led Balloon took a page left by someone and came up with a full article here. Papercup be praised. Aleister 2:52 15-4-'11
Actually... it does much more properly use the paper cups. 1234~03:43, 15 April 2011
Delete. While better developed than Laundry Detergentism or Kiwianism it suffers from the same predictable formula of taking Christianity, replacing god with a random noun and rambling on about it for a few paragraphs. The concept is utterly feeble and the humor almost nonexistent. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:11, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
What's that you say, you hate all the religions today? And that is the tone it takes throughout. Spıke¬ 02:49 15-Apr-11
Comments
Eh, I added a {{VFD}} and reset the timer, but it really would be better if folks could remember in the first place. Not that I'm one to talk. 1234~03:43, 15 April 2011
I find it interesting how deleting things is usually considered hostile, when in fact most of the hostility on VFD comes from the keep voters. Dexter, what is wrong with this nomination and why would it merit a ban? 1234~16:26, 15 April 2011
Delete. A cut and paste fake religion article: (Noun)ists worship (noun). They have (number) commandments about how to treat (noun) and a (noun) related festival. They are the sworn enemies of (other noun). --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:36, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
Not much is known about them. Ranty and listy and about nothing. Spıke¬ 02:43 15-Apr-11
No real concept... and by real, I mean real. 1234~03:27, 15 April 2011
Delete. A dull retread that lacks the grip of the funny. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:23, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete I read this wanting to vote keep because there was something I was sure was amusing about the idea, it never got anywhere though. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:54, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
This shows the difference between a good and bad writer. Papercupism works, this falls on its face and then tries to eat the sidewalk. Aleister 2:58 15-4-'11
Delete. If the letter Z was inherently funny this would be article of the year. In the real world this fails like a burlap thong.--Count of Monkey Crisco 18:15, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. It does have a concept, but is essentially just another bio of a made-up character. Don't crack wise with the navigational tools! An article isn't funny if no one can reach it. Spıke¬ 18:38 14-Apr-11
Delete. This was originally composed in coloured crayons by the boy at the back of the class. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:25, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
Are you on Crack? mAttlobster. (hello) 22:51, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (8)
Delete. You know how just about everything on Uncyclopedia that's based on South Park is stiflingly unfunny (Crab People, Randy Marsh, Butters) and ends up on VFD? Check this out: A list of unconnected celebrities/popular characters who are, usually, fat. Some of them are rude and a very tiny minority are fat and rude. On a list of barely related characters each one gets an unfunny one liner, the worst of which try feebly to reference a joke in Southpark. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byCount of Monkey Crisco (talk • contribs)
It's so bad it's scary. Wow... -- 17:12, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Given that a "Cartman wannabee" is essentially just someone or something the author thinks is ridiculous (or Jewish, I guess), it is amazing that the author can only enumerate 44 of them, this after counting The Klumps as six. It is not so amazing that most of the 44 are not funny. Spıke¬ 17:46 14-Apr-11
I cannot support the keeping of this off what it is and how it's done, but may as well userspace it if it does get voted enough to delete, yeah... 1234~01:51, 15 April 2011
Delete. I guess the next 56 wannabes will be a lot funnier than the first 44 or is that putting the cartman before the horse? Terrible puns aside, eject into random electron space. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:29, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
Weak delete. The humor theme is mostly the author's own indecision, which breaks the "encyclopedia" canon without the excuse of a large payback of laughs. Explaining "lol" and "wtf" and making sport of "See also" make me think this is author's first page. And some jokes are simply trite!!!oneone!!! Spıke¬ 12:04 14-Apr-11
Okay, I actually loved this and think it could go on to greatness with a little bit of work. Could you move it to my userspace instead of deleting it? --Scofield 19:29, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)
Delete.Heavy in redlinks, barely completed, not funny at all and doesn't make a lot of sence... - Frosty dah snowguycontribsKUNPLEB 00:37, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Authors (one of which is now permabanned) abandon the higher calling of telling an amusing story in favor of the lesser task of making 1334-craft form complete sentences. A Wacky War and a creation myth for the 1334 community using meme-dropping. Spıke¬ 00:42 14-Apr-11
Interesting as a case study of an intriguing internet phenomenon, but not really... ah, funny, or satire, or well-written or anything that really has much use. 1234~01:43, 15 April 2011
Comments
SPIKE were you talking about Another n00b when you said one of the authors was permabanned. Because Olipro reduced his ban settings to a month. --Scofield 19:34, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I see no point in a page that purports to be about a guy from a Serbian Wikipedia. I see even less point in one that isn't funny. --UU - natter14:45, Apr 13
Delete. A typical biography of a made-up character using randumbo. Possible allusions to Wikipedia or to Milosevič are not topical enough to be anything else than memes-in-place-of-funny. Spıke¬ 14:52 13-Apr-11
Delete. Nope, I've read it three times, and it still makes zero sense to me, and I can find zero laughs and zero point. --UU - natter14:37, Apr 13
The Prime Minister is so eager to have sodomy with him. Wikipedia says this is the nickname of Wee Meng Chee, a Malaysian singer notorious for singing a politicized version of the national anthem. I see some attempted laughs, mostly toilet humor; and all sorts of listcruft. Spıke¬ 14:57 13-Apr-11
not weird, lame. also, see the top of my talk page (not the video. not the thing underneath it either. the thing underneath that.). --Roman Dog Bird 06:31, April 13, 2011 (UTC)
Delete Is it funny? mAttlobster. (hello) 18:18, April 13, 2011 (UTC)
I'm noticing a distinct lack of article. Granted, that foxy bloke removed a fair bit of random, but... there really isn't much of anything left. Not that there was much of anything before. 1234~18:28, 13 April 2011
Comments
Weirdness is not a vice, but this article needs pruning. The fact that you can produce soft-porn graphics using only a typewriter doesn't need to be retold so many times; the page seems to be an assembly of such art, which is probably not even our own. The text of the article is a nice start. Spıke¬ 13:29 12-Apr-11
I see potential here, so I did a bit of work on it. I think the page could use another paragraph (maybe one in 4chan style--ever heard of Train Man?), but since the article's subject is texty art, I can't imagine it needing much more than a couple paragraphs. Though it would be nice if we could downsize those "images" so someone can avoid zooming in and out as the page scrolls. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 06:10, April 13, 2011 (UTC)
I took a look at that ASCII art page referenced and this article is actually just a duplicate, anyway. I agree that it's not really worth keeping in its current state--I just don't have the time to committ to a full rewrite at the moment. Could we send it to my userspace so I can use it for target practice? -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 19:29, April 13, 2011 (UTC)
Nom I am ashamed to have an article that shares a name with me not to be funny. It's all just gibberish talk about Blue Elmo and killing live lollipops. Very little satire, very little humour. --Lollipop-CONTRIBS-WRITINGS-SHOP-Now adopting! 23:43, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
That's what your hunting. This is just dumb. I should think nominator would take it upon himself to overhaul it. Spıke¬ 23:48 11-Apr-11
If there is one, there shouldn't be. 1234~01:22, 12 April 2011
It was huffed by Zombiebaron on March 12 of this year. I think that was the same day it was made too. (talk)01:28, 12 April 2011
I asked Chief, and he said as long as there is no article on Lollipop, then I can have the redirect. --Lollipop-CONTRIBS-WRITINGS-SHOP-Now adopting! 01:47, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
He says no such thing, You may NOT make it redirect to your userpage, and if you do, I assure you that I will delete it and give you a 7 day ban for it. I would tolerate you writing a funny article and sneaking a link to your page in there somewhere, but that's about it. -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 08:52, April 13, 2011 (UTC)
That the Chief Justice denied your request, and gave you the reason why, does not mean that if the reason is Overtaken by VFD, the Chief Justice has approved your request! Spıke¬ 00:20 13-Apr-11
Keep. A tidy up would help, not bad enough to go. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:50, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Keep The title of this article is plain hilarious. I love it. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:00, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Improved. The template (one of the 12 is Chucky Cheese? Delightful!) and "periodic table" are elements of any rewrite. The body of the article is written by a kid who doesn't know enough about science or religious dogma to mock it (as happens in the Wacky War genre) but that's easily fixed. Spıke¬ 13:06 11-Apr-11
This was on my rewrite list. I must have had a reason. 1234~01:04, 12 April 2011
I hate cheese. It tastes terrible. But I haven`t yet tried this one... KEEP! Cat the Colourful(Feed me!)Zzz05:44, 12April, 2011(UTC)
Keep. I beg to disagree. But if it does get deleted I pity the person with the task of removing all the red linked templates from all the pages its used on - Frosty dah snowguycontribsKUNPLEB 02:58, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Strong keep. I think this has a real purpose for people who are viewing Uncyc at school, a library, a public computer or any other public place where viewing such a page may have repercussions; it's not just for people at work. I don't consider this a joke, I consider it essential. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 05:15, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Are you....um...OUT OF YOUR FREAKING MINDS???!!! --Scofield 12:45, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. It is useful to flag articles with images that could be a problem in some places. Should be used more sparingly but also a strong keep too. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:53, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Dittos; useful though overused, as are most of the templates that try to set the stage for the article that follows. Dexter, the entire site is not NSFW, as taking a break from work to view Uncyclopedia is a much more minor transgression than viewing Bare Tit on the boss's machine. Spıke¬ 13:09 11-Apr-11
HERP DERP We have had this since 2005, if you dislike it, either present an alternative to make it "funny" or go fuck a corpse in the ass -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 01:23, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
Eh I mean templates suck shit and all that, but this is sometimes kind of helpful. Still, no one should be on Uncyclopedia ever. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:51, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. If the acronym meant Nationalist Socialist Female Warriors, then it would be useless. But we NEED this. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:13, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
Strong keep. I can't believe this was even being considered for deletion. This is one of the only useful templates we have on this site. -- 01:33, April 13, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)
Kerkill Unnecessary template; has no humor value or parody function. This entire site is "NSFW", while this template only serves to categorize masturbatory material. {{NSFWimage}} may also require deletion. A bot could remove these with no issue. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 02:56, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Eternal vigilance against censorship. Tie a brick around it and sink it. Aleister 3:15 11-4-'11
It's hardly censorship, is it? The pretty pictures are still there, you're just warned about them... --UU - natter10:09, Apr 12
If people are worried about keeping their jobs, they shouldn't be on Uncyclopedia at work. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 03:50, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
This template is not funny so it should be deleted or sold to a template enthusiast at a hugely inflated price. If we want to keep it we should make the template itself deliberately unsuitable for work. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:49, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Its misuse overbears its redeeming qualities. Unless someone wants to fix that? 1234~01:01, 12 April 2011
Cat on a fence, here. Most of the places it's used are just plain stupid, but it does actually add to perhaps some single-digit number of articles, which is more than can be said for some templates. The image one, however, is completely pointless. Also, Dexter, if you're going to reply to someone's comment, adding another comment is usually more effective than putting the reply in the original whatever they're commenting about. More likely they'll see it that way. 1234~04:01, 11 April 2011
It's kind of humorous, I guess. Not particularly, and even that is completely ruined by its complete overuse, though. 1234~23:21, 11 April 2011
If you guys actually want this nuked, I will do so by replacing it with a space, so as not to cause a metric fuckton of redlinks -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 01:23, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
A bot or I could remove the redlinks in a matter of an hour. That's a non-issue. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 01:25, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
If anyone redoes it, please keep the flashing girl on the site, I used it on Sideboob as a stand alone without the template. Thanks. Aleister 2:55 12-4-'11
Delete. IP took NRV tag off without fixing the article. Almost 4 years later and it still needs to be fixed. (talk)05:52, 11 April 2011
Delete. Some obscure mathematical unfunny at work here, with Swedish knobs on. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:45, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Based primarily on the Principle of Illogical Continuity. This article delights in its own overcomplication. I.P. fleshed out the article in 2006 and nothing has happened to it since (except addition of a category by MadMax). Romartus, I am partial to certain Swedish knobs. Spıke¬ 13:00 11-Apr-11
Delete. Mainly unfunny with little work or redeeming value. NERVUN 23:02, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Short and photo-less. Concept is okay, style does indeed tend toward the random, author Area never finished the job and has been gone from the site for a full six years. Spıke¬ 01:09 11-Apr-11
Nothing but unfunny dick jokes. This hurts to read. YleerFPI 18:34, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I had to go to the Wikipedia article to learn that the Cartoon Network had yet another show about young losers. But our article adds nothing to theirs except obscenities. Spıke¬ 18:42 10-Apr-11
Delete This fucker is fucking fucked. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:46, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
Keep, thanks for pointing this out. This is really clever, and with a little cleanup and a few pics can be a feature (I'm being serious-ly). Had a few quick laughs without reading every line. Aleister 19:38 8-4-'11
Keep. If it were really vanity, I wouldn't excuse it, but the obscure philosophers are not necessarily self-references. A pleasant little tour-de-force, but parts, including the intro, need to be written better. Spıke¬ 23:26 8-Apr-11
I'm slightly vain. mAttlobster. (hello) 07:31, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)
Fantasy/vanity nonsense. -- 18:07, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Not sure if the mistakes in it are deliberate or accidental but who really knows except Carly Simon? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:41, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
Keep.Booster Gold is an actual superhero from DC Comics. This article is childish but serves as a helpful repository of photos of people wearing gold armor and sport jackets. A tie-in to Midas would be the theme it lacks. Spıke¬ 11:53 8-Apr-11
Keep "Memes and cruft"? None here. You know nothing of Booster Gold. Spike knows. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 19:04, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
Do not! I had to look it up on Wikipedia. Only the Shadow "knows." Spıke¬ 19:21 10-Apr-11
Okay then. Maybe I'm the only one who truly gets it, but this is pretty funny for a significant segment of society though it could be funnier, I assure all. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 03:27, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
Keep I know nothing of either Booster Gold or this guy SPIKE. But Dexter knows. Aleister 19:42 8-4-'11
Keep. Although it really should have an ugly or fix tag.
Delete. Makes no sense. That, and the author can't decide how he wants to spell 
HAHAHA
Keep. - 
Comment. Removed some of the rubbish with a minor re-rewrite. It's still not very good but might be ok as a space filler until something a lot better comes along. --
Bleah!
Obliterate. WHAT IS THIS??? - 
Eh? Objection, Your Honor! Relevance? -- 
It's so bad it's scary. This reminds of a certain article about a certain "Malcom" that was nuked recently... -- 
KERKILL!!!!
Smite. More babbling about fake physics. I like the template at the top, though. Can we adopt it and use it for something else? -- 
Strong keep. I think this has a real purpose for people who are viewing Uncyc at school, a library, a public computer or any other public place where viewing such a page may have repercussions; it's not just for people at work. I don't consider this a joke, I consider it essential. -- 
