This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
#Keep and rewrite tag. There's a few scattered good jokes in there, and frankly, about half of everything I've ever written on this site would suddenly have a red link in it if this gets deleted. pillow talk 04:12, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Per and for Hyperbole. And why only half? You could shoulder linking most of the rest of your pages. Aleister 12:05 28-3-'11
Sometimes, you just can't find a good opportunity to talk shit about Avril Lavigne in a hidden link. Usually you can :) pillow talk 15:04, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)
I was thinking of heeding the rewrite tag, but then I decided to just put it up here so that it can be wiped out. Anybody who actually has a sense of humor can write about her from scratch. --Scofield 18:56, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Smite. Basically, the general theme of the article is "Avril is a lesbian that has gas problems." Funny. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 21:26, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Shit, I was wrong about the few scattered good jokes. This is fucking horrible. We can temporarily redirect to Avril's_Butt_(Template_Family). I'll see if I can work something up that's worthy of being here.I maed a yuky rewrite. pillow talk 21:46, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Okay, this isn't my best work by a long shot, but I did a start-class rewrite that at least has something to do with Lavigne. Replace the page with mine? What do you think? pillow talk 22:55, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Replace it Hyperbole. This new beat is plenty rock-steady. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:59, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Replace it. But lose the initial template. Spıke¬ 23:02 28-Mar-11
Asking me to lose the initial template would be like asking Sarah Palin to lose Trig! Just because it's retarded doesn't mean it isn't family! pillow talk 23:08, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Suggests the subject is gay and a pedophile without any good humour. 18:03, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. And for similar instant laughs, involves rednecks (okay, perhaps, when discussing auto racing), Mexicans, and Jews, from the school of thought where hitting an Uncyclopedia home run is just a matter of stepping on all four meme bases. Also, he was named Gilles because he was born with gills! Get it? Spıke¬ 18:29 27-Mar-11
I would rather ram an eighteen-inch dagger through mmy forehead than let anyone else read that. It isn't funny at all; it's just random. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 21:01, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I would rather stab Gamma287 with an eighteen inch dagger than read that again. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:00, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. The Count agrees. Hey, wait!!! --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 00:32, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Instantly ironic--but not clever. Spıke¬ 20:21 27-Mar-11
Comments
Kept: 5 keep votes. pillow talk 15:05, March 28, 2011 (UTC) Since when has that been a policy? --ChiefjusticePS2 17:06, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
The idea gained pretty good traction (given the size of the active voting base at the time) at Forum:More VFD stuff. Also, I won't count on 7 more delete votes showing up within the next hour either, so a more traditional keep is imminent anyway. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:13, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Is there a policy that says that "5 keep votes = kept" is not our policy? I've read the deletion policy, and I don't think I saw anything that forbade me from closing this nomination, which is very obviously going to result in a keep anyway. pillow talk 17:18, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
You didn't read anything about leaving the nomination open 24 hours, despite how it may look the vote is going? Spıke¬ 17:20 28-Mar-11
All right, all right, I'll leave these kinds of things open. But we both know that the point of that rule is to make sure something doesn't get deleted before the author has a chance to show up and explain himself - not to ensure that we can't close nominations that don't have a bat's chance in hell of succeeding. pillow talk 17:23, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Besides, even if 11 more Uncyclopedians suddenly showed up and voted "Delete", there's still a prevailing sentiment that the result should be "Kept." pillow talk 17:24, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Okay, kept, yes, but it is possible that there may be more than 5 keeps on something that a majority of the community would still rather overrule. There are certain... things. Yes, these days there are established rules for administrators to delete most of such things on sight without them ever coming here, but... don't count on that covering all of them. Obviously that doesn't apply to this. That's not the point. 1234~04:50, 29 March 2011
Delete. This article doesn't deal with the cult leader in a funny way. It just calls him homosexual. -- 10:31, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Also a hefty dose of Nazism and even Scientology--saying very little about his eminently ready for ridicule real-life religious cult and mass suicide. The facts are funnier than this article. Spıke¬ 12:56 27-Mar-11
Huh, and the article gave me the impression he wasn't even a real person. Or wasn't he? Maybe there was an elaborate conspiracy... but I digress. 1234~19:50, 27 March 2011
Delete. "Delete Me!" is written all over this article. If this is really worth writing about, someone please start over and try again. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 21:17, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Failed to make me laugh. pillow talk 23:05, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Keep Only an hour old. Stop trying to game the system. I've no idea what gaming the system means - just my favourite ban comment. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:52, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Both of you are violating the system of VFD. It has only been around for a few hours. If you really don't like it, put it on QVFD. --Lollipop-CONTRIBS-WRITINGS-SHOP-Now adopting! 22:54, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Don't you lecture me lolliflop. We're at war here son! MAN UP! mAttlobster. (hello) 22:56, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
This has an ICU and is on QVFD. What in the fuck are we doing? (talk) 22:58, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Yup, invalid nom. Author is trying hard to be funny, but simply isn't. He isn't trying hard to make this look like an Uncyclopedia article; that's Lollipop doing that, also InB4 Olipro with {{ICU}}. Spıke¬ 22:59 28-Mar-11
I'm not sure Uncyclopedia will recover from this. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:00, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Invalid: nomination closed. It's nice not to be the admin fucking things up for a change. pillow talk 23:02, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
If it was an IP, I wouldn't be so nice. I noticed it was a new user, so I added formatting and an ICU tag. --Lollipop-CONTRIBS-WRITINGS-SHOP-Now adopting! 23:27, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. An established page, I believe. Linked History of Great Britain, which I call "The Epic", to the top, and removed a long stupid thing. Most of the rest is actual writing, seemingly coherent. Aleister 11:19 27-3-'11
Keep The joke is that it's called 'Long article' and it's a long article. I know this isn't groundbreaking but it should not be deleted. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:23, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete and redirect to History of Great Britain. Only the very beginning is actually about long articles, after which it immediately devolves into repetitive crap, and cutting it down to relevant content that has a hope of being funny after the novelty of the fact that it is long would remove the longness. Add to that that said relevant content is in fact rather boring and not particularly amusing, anyhow, why not redirect the entire thing to an actual long article that is worth reading? 1234~10:38, 27 March 2011
Redirect. Apart from the length of the page, there's nothing particularly funny in here. 17:50, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Can someone change the name back to "Long article" from "Zork", I can't find the code where that was done. Gotta be there somewhere. Aleister 11:21 27-3
I removed that as well as chunks of two books (one of which was in there twice; weren't even unique chunks of two books) and a some strings of digits and about ten sections of flat-out repetition and now it's not even long. 1234~11:30, 27 March 2011
Bad writing--including verbosity--comes so easily to some of us that a showcase of it is not notable. But if Lyrithya says this particular showcase is now under control, I'll abstain. Spıke¬ 12:51 27-Mar-11
Under control? It's not even long anymore. Now it's just a bad article that's kind of long, without even that joke going for it. Not that it was much of one. 1234~18:21, 27 March 2011
I can see the start of what you call a 'meme' here. Any long article will be redirected to the Romartus-Zarbag epic History of Great Britain. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:24, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Not so much a 'meme', as not so much a 'meme'. Do you see? mAttlobster. (hello) 21:42, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Of the five pages originally in this category, I removed one where the category was added as random noise, and one where Aleister simply wanted to write a page with a list of categories seven lines long. A third is on VFD, above. The other two are arguably about bearded women. Spıke¬ 05:08 27-Mar-11
Keep. SPIKE vandalized Poop throwing monkeys by removing this relevant category. Some of the chimps are woman, and they are undoubtedly bearded. And For. all the people who come to uncyclopedia and ask themselves "I wonder if there are any pages about bearded women? This is my interest, and I will check the categories section." We must think of our readers. Aleister 10:37 27-3-'11
On "Monkeys," of course, you are not thinking about your readers; you are patting yourself on the back. Spıke¬ 12:49 27-Mar-11
If we all had arms as long as a gibbons it would be much easier to pat ourselves on the back. Then again, what about turtles, who don't even know they have a back to pat.Aleister 15:43 27-3-'11
Keep Categories don't have to categorise, they just have to be amusing. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:18, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)
Delete. Another category which fails to categorize.--Count of Monkey Crisco 02:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Is there a point to random categories about nothing? --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 03:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
I was going to say keep until I saw what was in it. Shame. 1234~19:45, 27 March 2011
Comments
I've added quite a few pics, so the category does categorize now. Aleister 11:22 27-3-'11
Kept. Improved during VFD process. Renom later if necessary. pillow talk 15:06, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Lots of reasons to save it. The map sequence for one, interesting. It has sections, and a timeline which has minor coherence. Some of the words are real words, and they can be manipulated and moved to form concepts and whatnot. My thumb is sticking up (hey, get off of there buddy). Aleister 13:09 26-3-'11
Keep, if Aleister's volunteering. The intro is good; how indeed does anyone know a war is either "Last" or "First"? Needs a better link to the real-world "war to end all wars." The description of the actual progress of the war is tedious. Spıke¬ 14:10 26-Mar-11
Too many World War -insert here- jokes.Propane timeHAMMERZIET! --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 01:50, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. This was the very first article I ever edited (as an IP) so it'll be sad to let this one go. Not like anyone else cares. - LOLvandalz 10:20, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comment. If there's a chance that someone's willing to sort this out, I can't really justify voting delete on this one, although the current content is pretty terrible. -- 21:19, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comment. Since everyone is misreading my comment as an offer to work on the page, I'll just sit in back here, eat popcorn, and watch. Aleister 22:41 26-3-'11
Well, I did some edits, a few, and may go back. The page is pretty good just looking at the pics and reading a few lines here and there. There are paragraphs and everything. Aleister 22:30 26-3-'11
Kept. Apparently improved during VFD process. pillow talk 15:07, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I don't see how this has been here for almost a year... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 05:06, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Died...in a sleeping bag unrolling accident. That was a gem. There could be a couple others, but they are hidden in this long ramble about a TV character. Spıke¬ 05:14 27-Mar-11
Delete. Drug it with a tranquilizer, tie it up in plastic, slice it with a hand-saw, and throw it in the Bay Harbor, where some treasure hunters may find it. --Scofield 08:42, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Rambling nonsense. Why? Why? --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! That is all. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 04:00, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Articles like this are an author's demonstration of his ability to free-associate, not an attempt to do anything for the reader. 04:59 The intro is exceptionally bad at inducing the reader to finish the article. And, God damn it, don't use "infamous" when you mean "notorious" (and when there is no intrinsic reason even to use "notorious" except to puff up your writing). Nothing in this article suggests infamy. Spıke¬ 16:13 27-Mar-11
Not even well written, either. 1234~19:46, 27 March 2011
Delete. Here's the rundown: made up character does something random and wacky, nobody cares. Repeat until bored from writing. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Nuke this waffle. It's more random than what I wrote as a n00b. Good show... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 03:56, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! I haven't seen an article this bad for quite some time. -- 10:26, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Despite care taken on presentation and shooping, this article is bad writing about a character that the author dreamed up, and about whom he repeatedly emphasizes that nobody cares. Spıke¬ 16:20 27-Mar-11
Keep Invalid nom. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:15, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)
Sure, I can see why people might want to keep the Vandalism example on wheels (I guess), but why do we keep these? Not like there's anything to read, just browser-crashing madness. Also, they're cluttering up Special:LongPages. 1234~19:24, 27 March 2011
Delete, one of the few things i don't like on uncyclopedia! Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 20:07, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Go write a funny article. Spıke¬ 20:17 27-Mar-11
That was a month ago (okay, a day less than a month ago, but in this case...) - things can be renominated after a month. Except this isn't the same nomination, anyhow; that was the example and all of the archives. This is just the archives. 1234~19:41, 27 March 2011
Too soon. If Dexter wants to wikilawyer this nomination, let's go ahead and make his nigger ass wait a day or three before he casts his keep vote. pillow talk 20:16, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Keep.. Sadistic and funny! A two in one! However, the grammar and spelling could be improved... *goes into grammar rant* --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 01:41, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. This held my attention throughout. It kept getting better and better in terms of handling of time and space, concepts of "the one spirit" and matter and energy as one point shared by every life. And the concept of the all-in-one (I and I) collectively handing its negative emotional content and pain to one faultless individual actually not only summarizes many of the messiah legends but in some ways extends them. In that aspect of itself it may, indeed, be the best joke ever, even if it's no laughing matter. Aleister 2:02 27-3-'11
Keep Stupid nomination. mAttlobster. (hello) 02:17, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. i get it, he walked into a bar. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:06, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. This simply isn't a great concept: the joke tries to be as unfunny as possible. As a result, the whole page is just unfunny. 10:22, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Deliberate unfunny--although it does count as success at something--isn't funny. We sometimes showcase pages for their unfunniness, but they have something notable about them. Spıke¬ 14:14 26-Mar-11
Delete. Best joke ever indeed. (talk) 19:05, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Keep Short in no way means it's bad. You all need to back away from that way of thinking, else you'll never get invited to parties. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 20:15, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)
Delete. Relies too much on large numbers and random for humour. 21:32, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Begins promisingly: Use generic -stan suffix, confuse it with Satan, and take some slaps at Asian countries (in after Borat, but might still work). Then Section 1 abruptly changes to Wacky War, the Great Pie War against the right-thinking LEET people. Motivation for, conduct of, and resolution of the war, is all babble. Finishes up with listcruft, more leetcruft, and stick figures. Find a user's sandbox for it. Spıke¬ 22:30 25-Mar-11
Equally delete-worthy in its new life as a stub. Spıke¬ 16:23 27-Mar-11
Bloody hell, that's random. 1234~09:13, 26 March 2011
Propane! Random, listy, etc. Now, where's my RPG-7? --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 02:00, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
When's the last time anyone read undictionary. I've never even looked at it. Maybe people read it all the time. Above my paygrade. Aleister 12:10 27-3-'11
No, nobody does; it's fallen into disrepair. Alas! 1234~18:22, 27 March 2011
Keep I reverted the vandalism (I am great! [It did delete the VFD tag but one of you keeners will slip that back in]). Don't know what your definition of memes is Spiketron, but there don't seem to be any in here? Anyway, it's not brilliant, but neither's the letter "j" and nobody's recommending we delete that are they? mAttlobster. (hello) 16:21, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
As well as established memes, I include celebrity names thrown in for the sake of instant humor (just add humor). In the first paragraph of Section 1: Gore, Jim Henson, and Oprah; and perhaps Turing and Merlin. Spıke¬ 17:13 24-Mar-11
Delete. Author does not know how to spell, does not know that a "pickel" is a cucumber, and does not know how to create comedy except to link to Hitler-versus-Jews for instant laughs. Spıke¬ 14:19 26-Mar-11
Propane! That's how this should be burned. Hitler and fascism jokes are old and must be eradicated! --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 01:37, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
This has several ideas in it that could become articles, none of which go beyond a couple of words. The overall is much too decrepit to keep, however, unless someone wants to adopt it. 1234~08:54, 26 March 2011
This is one of those articles which can't be improved apart from by blanking and starting again. -- 09:46, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Propane gas explosion inside of a room. It's already a stub, so imagine how short it will be afterwards! --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 01:47, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Burn with propane. Porn joke, another porn joke, three more BDSM jokes, no images (shocker). I blame twelve year olds... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 02:08, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. A sales-pitch for a made-up porn character. You said the secret void. Spıke¬ 04:56 27-Mar-11
Comments
Please, check the histories before nominating articles - this is only two days old. Put it on ICU, not VFD. 1234~05:31, 27 March 2011
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 01:57, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Well, this is pretty embarrassing, but this should have been deleted many, many months ago. Its ICU expired and Chiefjustice deleted the main page, but didn't delete any of the subpages. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:33, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Here's the basis for the "jokes" 1) Tulips 2) Turnips 3) The band is gay. Never do we hit solid concept. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:57, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Satly orgasm. Intro tells you you don't care once; cites AC/DC twice. "Apparantly he is unable to get a hard on when looking at his wife, until he puts on scanty clothing and charges him $20 for a handjob." In other words, it doesn't get any better when you read on. Spıke¬ 02:20 25-Mar-11
Delete Because I'm 'zany'. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:31, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. For calling me a git and telling me to "use my head". --Scofield 11:07, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I, for one, will miss him. Aleister 22:34 26-3-'11
Comments
Lyrithya, as a poopsmith and a temp op, you really shouldn't be making nominations like this. I expected better behavior out of you. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 18:56, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Better behaviour? Love, from you, what does that even mean? At any rate, if poopsmithiness or adminniness can only involve seriousness, then I'd want nothing to do with any of it, and nothing to do with those who do, for what place do they have here? This is not a serious wiki, and this is not a serious response, and this is not a serious concern. Please consult your batmoose next time. 1234~22:19, 26 March 2011
I could stand all the joke bans, but this joke VFD nomination is a major fuckup. This experiment has failed. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:35, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, man. I remember when people didn't treat this wiki as one big fucking joke, you know? I'm sick of these motherfucking tempops on this motherfucking wiki. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 00:45 Mar 27, 2011
How? I wonder how this got away... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 01:32, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. There is a nonsense number in the title and, despite being well-written, nothing to grab onto in the randomness of the article's text. Spıke¬ 01:36 26-Mar-11
Not much there. Is there really a point? --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 00:22, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Amuses the author by pranking the reader. Spıke¬ 00:24 26-Mar-11
Technically, this is an invalid nom due to the lacking age, however the article is of such a nature that maintenance tags would serve no purpose, considering as the the whole point is the shortness, and they'd be just as contestable as outright deletion. Anyway, I'm really not amused. 1234~09:05, 26 March 2011
Delete. Lame in-joke. Very lame. --Scofield 11:13, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Though lyrithya also has a point about this being an invalid nom. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:17, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
Look at the mirror. This article is so very perverse, and is virtually about nothing. If It lives, someone edit protect it against IP's. God, I hate IP's; they're frigging annoying. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 21:48, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
fuuuuuuccccckkkkkkkk --Roman Dog Bird 22:09, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Built on a bad foundation in Uncyclopedia's childhood, this article could not escape it's rotten roots and has only expanded into badness. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:39, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Nominator is the only registered user who has worked on this all year. (Oddly, it got in its present state with no help from Bhind45.) If he is throwing in the towel, it should go. Spıke¬ 22:51 25-Mar-11
No to both of them, please. 1234~09:08, 26 March 2011
There is an alternate version that I did on the mirror. It could be longer with more images, but someone take a look and see if it is better (it isn't as bad and is, frankly, slightly factual). --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 23:44, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
The mainspace article is about to die. You will be free to roll in a better one (not another version of the same one in spite of the unanimous vote!)--and, in my opinion, an article that has something to do with facts cannot avoid being better. Spıke¬ 23:52 25-Mar-11
I'll post itif when the article is deleted. It's a rough start, but I think it will due. --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 23:57, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
This is substantially the same article, a bit better taken care of, minus most of the photos. I didn't dig in in detail. The problem with the current article is that it describes a funny TV show and its only basis of additional humor is to show us what the author thinks, such as cut-downs. Do you claim the mirror version has a better comedy concept? I don't see it. Spıke¬ 00:13 26-Mar-11
Then I think you should not roll it in after the delete without taking things in a significant new direction. Spıke¬ 00:23 26-Mar-11
Anyhow, I have bad luck with reposting things... --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 00:25, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I think posting here to get us all to read this, followed by restoring essentially the same thing, will quickly lead to a spate of bad luck. Spıke¬ 00:36 26-Mar-11
Delete. Imagine, a chav's guide to author's home town--a town that is kind of charming to him, and if reader can't figure out why--well, he makes the place seem totally unremarkable to me. Spıke¬ 22:47 25-Mar-11
ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY LIST!!! --Gamma287☭Tetяis? 00:00, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. A private role-playing club in southeastern Michigan wants its own Uncyclopedia article (which isn't even any good) to hump traffic to its own web site. Spıke¬ 22:33 25-Mar-11
Delete. I don't see overt vanity, just a collection of randomness, starting with the junk assertion that CSU is in New Mexico. Any of this that is a coded reference to something that actually happens at CSU doesn't make it notable to anyone on the outside. Spıke¬ 12:36 25-Mar-11
Delete. I always feel a bit wary when considering an article with the "overly British" template on it for deletion but if this thing is funny in Britain this shit is England's problem, not mine. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:39, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Tea is British. This article is dumb; of the genre: Create a character and ramble on about him. Again, no reason to use the first person and Q-and-A format. The {{British}} template, or any other that explains the alleged humor, coaches the reader, or protects itself from edit or deletion, breaks the encyclopedia canon without delivering benefit. Spıke¬ 12:40 25-Mar-11
Propane! It's short and unfunny, like an angry midget. Gamma287☭Tetяis? 02:10, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Propane! One of the rare occasions randomness has made me laugh. This must be deleted by propane explosion, courtesy of Hank Hill. Gamma287☭Tetяis? 02:13, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Previous versions are not too bad. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:19, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Keep, though crummy. The most notorious current case of a person destroying his own life in full public view requires an Uncyclopedia page. It is low-lying fruit for someone to give this article comedy value-added. Currently, the article is mostly cheap shots and randumbo. Spıke¬ 11:24 25-Mar-11
Really? This is my second vfd of the month. I know it's not feature-worthy or anything, but it's not that bad. Up to the random second half, which I didn't bother rewriting, it's little more than a regurgitation of his quotes and that's all I think it really needs to be. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 19:12, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. As Dexter would say: why is this here? (talk) 19:38, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Naaaaw. Also, you people are really weird. 1234~00:12, 26 March 2011
Keep.. Good, media-inspired concept. Everyone loves a winning warlock! Gamma287☭Tetяis? 01:40, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. What the hell is wrong with you? --Scofield 11:10, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. There's sort of a concept here, bad roommates who filch your food, but it's never really developed. Everything else in this article is substandard. From humor to grammar to the MSPaint illustration improperly framed this is a showcase of ineptitude. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:02, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Article is a vehicle for coded references to a housemate who doesn't clean up after himself. That's all it does. Spıke¬ 11:18 25-Mar-11
Delete. Thanks to Aleister, this is now a lame attempt to write a story around an animation. Before, it was a lame attempt to write a story around nothing. Spıke¬ 12:08 24-Mar-11
More at issue is the terrible formatting, than anything else. And we have... things... for that. 1234~07:39, 24 March 2011
Keep The best Lipsonia article on Uncyclopediarer. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:23, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
Strong keep. I suggest it. DJ Mixerr 02:10, March 25, 2011 (UTC) (talk)(contributions)
Delete (2)
Delete. Irritating fantasy Soviet state. 17:55, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Lipsonia "has more nuclear power plants than non-mutant people" and travelers get "a disease that hasn't even been discovered yet." Don't see a point or a payback from using the Q&A format instead of encyclopedic. Not even interesting in the wake of the Japanese mishap. Spıke¬ 19:09 23-Mar-11
Keep. This article is listy fancruft, but it has complete sentences and paragraphs, and its tone is to ridicule its subject with apparent objectivity rather than simply assert that I Think This Shit Is Shitty. Nominator Bhind45 could learn from it. Spıke¬ 12:20 22-Mar-11
Terrible, but perhaps not terrible enough. 1234~07:33, 24 March 2011
Keep Spike's hit the nail on the head. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:29, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Older versions were not funny, newer version are a dire mess of pop culture cruft and lists.--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:46, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. You can't develop a comedy concept if you can't carry a thought beyond one line of text. Spıke¬ 11:10 24-Mar-11
Delete. First, the article tries to frame the founders of the Breakfast Club as cereal killers, then as Reagan protesters. It successfully does neither, and goes from nowhere to listville. Simsilikesims 06:25, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Weak delete. Adequate concept; quotes and intro are okay but body of the article is mostly meme-cruft. Too short, only a token illustration. Not worked on since a userspacing tussle in 2007. Spıke¬ 11:08 24-Mar-11
Weak keep. Terrible article that contains some pretty funny stuff, like the "palindromedary" camel with two heads. I like this more than a blank page as a starting point. pillow talk 22:26, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Lots of good stuff in here, despite a horrible start. Spıke¬ 23:04 23-Mar-11
Cleanup, not delete. There be stuff there; may as well keep it on the off chance someone can use it. 1234~22:22, 24 March 2011
Delete (1)
EXTERMINATE! My animosity to this article has only grown since the edit filter prevented me adding a {{vfd}} tag. 21:18, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Done for you. The line starting with the number 4 was the culprit (I changed it to "four"). The spam filter is not always right, but it always tells you what it was it didn't like. Spıke¬ 23:12 23-Mar-11
Keep. Needs some touch up for sure, but you may need to read a synopsis of Wells' "Time Machine" or see the old movie from the 1960's. Aleister 19:55 23-3-'11
Keep. Per Aleister. This is actually quite a clever concept. 20:56, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. It should be kept. Made a few changes to correct literals/spellings and making better sense of what is otherwise a pretty good idea. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:52, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
A man, a plan, a canal, Romartus! Aleister 11:17 24-3-'11
Delete. Only real joke is that the company which makes Final Fantasy has ran out of natural numbers for their games...which is kind of meh. 17:53, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. The unfinished game article is replete with red-links and nonsense numbers; indeed, because a nonsense number is its reason to exist. Agreed, that's its only real joke. Spıke¬ 19:02 23-Mar-11
Keep. Per and for Hyperbole. And why only half? You could 
Delete. 
Smite. Basically, the general theme of the article is "Avril is a lesbian that has gas problems." Funny. --
I
Comment. The Count agrees. Hey, wait!!! --
UnPoetia:Couplet
Keep. This has gained my seal of approval. --
For. all the people who come to uncyclopedia and ask themselves "I wonder if there are any pages about bearded women? This is my interest, and I will check the categories section." We must think of our readers. 
Too many World War -insert here- jokes.
Nuke this waffle. It's more random than what I wrote as a n00b. Good show... --
Huh? Is it just me, or is this page nothing but vanity? It's unfunny, tedious and solely written by one person (who calls himself Csupomona). I'd QVFD this, but I'm not sure how notable the subject might be. -- 
