This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Delete. This poorly written, red-linky Wacky War is a wasteland. So is the other one. Yeah, redirect, and save the final illustration. Spıke¬ 15:13 23-Mar-11
Keep. Seems well enough written, although could use a clean up and a SPIKE through both hands and feet. And it may be based on something true, wasn't there a war with someone a few years ago or was that something else entirely? Aleister 18:17 22-3-'11
Keep If we delete and forget about it, it will only happen again. The logic...the logic... mAttlobster. (hello) 10:49, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)
Delete. What a load of old shite. Doesn't reference anything apart randomly selected Websites which are used as hate figures in this article. Completely lacks originality. - LOLvandalz 17:50, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Concept was OK, execution completely lacking. 21:02, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
I disagree on the lack of originality; the intro--making it increasingly evident that the narrator is a bitter old veteran of the "conflict" who cannot keep himself out of his article--is unique. But this approach is abandoned in the body of the article, which becomes just another fable of wiki editors heroically battling against other wikis. Spıke¬ 18:08 22-Mar-11
@Aleister: No, That was something else entirely. - LOLvandalz 18:20, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Ah, ok, I knew there was something. Did uncy fight with ED? Aleister 18:23 22-3-'11
@Aleister: If Uncyclopedia did fight ED, Uncyclopedia would have been DDoS'd. - LOLvandalz 18:27, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Fixed.though no humor added (except for the title of Section 1). Occasionally funny.Spıke¬ 23:31 21-Mar-11
Keep. This is better-written than the average article and has a decent concept, even if humour is lacking. -- 15:53, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Haven't we been through this before?� I thought we would agree to keep the article?! Come on. DJ Mixerr 02:36, March 23, 2011 (UTC) (talk)(contributions)
Keep It's not too bad. And I find the speculation about TKF and Zombiebaron being Jews to be hilarious. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 21:58, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)
This in a strange article, in that it somehow accomplishes the feat of being really Jewish and really unfunny. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:32, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Just not funny. Mixing two mostly unrelated things together with an absence of jokes, especially in a style like that, really doesn't work. 1234~23:19, 21 March 2011
Goes back and forth between being about the musical instrument and about Jewish scripture. Is not listed on any of the navigational templates (I've removed {{Italy}} from it and vice versa.) Several paragraphs begin with dithering. I found it quaint but not funny; Jews might conceivably like it. Spıke¬ 21:10 21-Mar-11
Apparently TKF's a Jew, but what of the others here? 1234~23:19, 21 March 2011
I'm not a Jew, but I got to second base with one once. pillow talk 21:53, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
I'm not Jewish and I cleaned it up. Evidently Accordion is a book of Scripture (modeled after the Psalms) that tells the story of two messengers of God (Bern and Moskowitz) who, through word and song, try to convert the people from idolatry to monotheism. Their flutes are shoved up their asses, leading them to invent a musical instrument that can't be. Apart from that, it's just irreverent pseudo-Biblical-scholarship. Of course, the fact that I have to explain the humor concept.... Spıke¬ 02:12 23-Mar-11
Famine, the guy who wrote it, isn't Jewish, either. But it strikes me as really quite odd that people are saying it could be good to Jews, considering evidence to the contrary sitting right here - TKF and Zombiebaron are Jewish, and they voted delete. 1234~02:56, 23 March 2011
Lyrithya, "people" aren't saying that, only I was saying that: that the original version was full of arcana that might be Judaica, that I didn't understand it but Jews might. Rather than call for an Uncyclopedia rabbinical council (though we have had one anyway), I changed the article's emphasis. Spıke¬ 11:19 24-Mar-11
Kept. Did I mention that the Jew I got to second base with was very attractive? pillow talk 11:29, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
I agree; utter shit. It's another one I've been thinking of rewriting, but won't vote keep until I get a few ideas. --BlackFlamingo 21:47, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
The problem with FF7 is that the concept has little potential for humor when in its purest form; it's all been done before. Someone needs to take this in a completely different direction. One about a highbrow piece of literature called Final Fantasy VII from the perspective of a stuffy nobleman would be unexpected. Then there could be an ending section on a possible video game adaptation (but because it will bring in all those fan conventions with all those costumed hooligans in drag, it will never happen!). -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 01:52, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
RENAMED from North Daquota, to which North Dakota redirected.
Fixed or something. Killed the lists, fixed the page title. Better than nothing. It was written in 2005, but it has been worked on since. Spıke¬ 19:54 21-Mar-11 post-edited
There's nothing spectacular about it, but it's an acceptable article now. 17:47, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Support material for certain better established Uncyclopedia in jokes that neither need its support nor link back to it. Subject matter has no real world or popular fiction counterpart and last, but certainly the opposite of least, the article is not actually funny. The entire article lacks a reason to exist. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:18, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. In other words, a meme-filled wasteland. It sounds as though author is writing coded references to his own hometown--or that this is a vestige of the Duck World we moved against last year. Spıke¬ 12:11 22-Mar-11
Delete.He changed the city's trolling industry over to the much more lucrative frotting industry, a move which upset the residents as they were born and bred trolls by this point. Han was later killed in a tragic cake-related accident, which was believed to have been orchestrated by the Chuckle Brothers. IT JUST GOES ON LIKE THAT. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:36, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. As "Ex-resident" says on the discussion page: "Surely these pages are supposed to be satirical? Most of this is simply random nonsense that could have been written about anywhere...." Spıke¬ 12:25 22-Mar-11
Delete a) It's not a fucking city. b) This article is hurts my soul. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:42, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
eat my balls --Roman Dog Bird 03:43, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Cyberbullying or the author of this is called Gordon. Either way it should be thrown out to sea.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:57, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Random and wacky-warrish. Kept in 2008 for some inexplicable reason. 16:58, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
The Soviets fought worser than the German. Author(s) were playing Call Of Duty in class, when they were supposed to be studying that his' doesn't take an apostrophe, and thought it would be funny to have Stalingrad fought by memes teleported to the scene. That is trite, and there is no other humor here. Spıke¬ 17:18 21-Mar-11
Delete. The introduction of Star Wars caused an internal concept collapse. There's no hope of saving this thing. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:37, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I was going to abstain, because there's a consistency and underlying logic to the thing and so it doesn't really deserve the hated label "random" but there's a tiresome and undeniably studenty sense of wackiness (Hitler teaming up with Ronald McDonald, just imagine that!) and it's a bit "random" in the set-up even if it manages to stick with it pretty well. So a delete vote it is. --Zarbag 08:53, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Can't believe it survived for 5 months without an ICU tag. --Scofield 11:46, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Article fits in a single screenful, exists to describe a single move in a video game, and does so by relating it to: Fucking and raping. What variety. Spıke¬ 12:28 21-Mar-11
Renamed--Ammo was a redirect to AMMO; now it's vice versa. Spıke¬ 21:26 19-Mar-11
Fixed.A mix of competent and incompetent writing. I'll say fixable. First, kill the all-capitals; AMMO is not an acronym and this article doesn't claim it is. Not amenable to redirection to Ammunition, which goes in a different direction (confusion with bulleted-lists). Kill the listcruft; kill the clit-craft. Kill, kill, kill. Then keep. Spıke¬ 20:33 19-Mar-11
Meh, pretty bad, but not bad enough to delete. That may be Spike's fault, but I can't be arsed to look. 1234~19:30, 20 March 2011
Delete (1)
Delete. Lists, vanity and the most desperate of puns, nothing more. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:24, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Meh. It's not great, but there's nothing too terrible about it either. The opening joke about the French made me smile =P 21:11, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Apparently it's been worked on. It's safe for a month. pillow talk 00:12, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I detect attempts at humor. Attempts being the key word. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:39, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Bah. Using actualities and utterly mutilating them would be better. The attempts are nigh unrelated. Like the thing thought that making stuff up is funny. 1234~19:26, 20 March 2011
Abstain. It's not terrible enough to delete it's just... well... as someone said before there's a bizarre lack of humour to the thing. --Zarbag 19:48, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Keep It's got the 'Fix' on it so what the fuck are you doing? mAttlobster. (hello) 14:21, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
The Fix tag is less formal than {{ICU}} (which the article also had, once). Fix was last added by JackOfSpades on 3-Mar. Any implicit promise that he had 30 days is outweighed by his tendency to remove tags rather than fix anything. Spıke¬ 14:43 20-Mar-11
I see no reason why this should be removed from mainspace, as it is. Yes, it's terrible, and yes, the guy has a tendency to remove tags, but the tag is there, so we may as well let it cover the thing. Give the bloke a chance to work on it. Give him a ban if he removes the tag again without fixing it. I can keep an eye on it, and suspect there be admins willing to do the actual banning if need be, but meantime... 1234~21:04, 20 March 2011
On second thought, he already did and already got banned. 1234~06:46, 21 March 2011
Keep. I wrote him on his talk page and he did lots of work on this page afterwards. He changed many of the "shit" "jokes" to "pimp and whore" jokes. This is progress. I would like to see him change "pimp and whore" jokes to "the progression of classical music from its inception in 2499990000000000 B.c. until six zillion years from now with Chuck Norris" jokes to show that he's further progressing. But he did try, and the format, length, and pics of the page aren't that bad. Aleister 11:07 21-3-'11
Delete (8)
I know this has a {Fix} tag on it, but honestly, I really think we're better off just killing it before Bhind45 tries to remove it, or something. --Scofield 13:19, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Userify This is the one he worked on the hardest. It doesn't belong in mainspace, but we can leave him this one in his userspace. (talk) 19:13, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
PS Author took off the {{fix}}. (talk) 06:23, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. This is one of the most embarrassingly horrible articles I've ever seen, it's a clear-cut case of tag abuse, and if Matt and TKF weren't voting keep I'd probably QVFD it right now for that tag abuse. pillow talk 07:29, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete Smells like the work of a 13 year old poopologist. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:42, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. - Complete unmitigated shit. Author is also a naughty little fucker with no regard for the lay of the land. -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 10:08, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Simply no redeeming value. 18:43, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Aleister, these copies are the problem; our reaction to them is not the problem. Spıke¬ 14:40 20-Mar-11
I'm proposing a hasty deletion, as Bhind45 is more likely to try to remove that tag without making any changes, hence setting the deadline back even further that it used to be. --Scofield 14:31, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
He's serving out a two-week ban. We can take our time. pillow talk 07:30, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
If you guys want to let it play out for a while, that doesn't bother me. But since the tag's been there a while, he technically has two weeks from today to fix it. If he just removes the tag, please ban him. As has already been said, he's now abusing the VFD system (speaking of which, if he doesn't put up a vote for them, when do we remove all those VFD tags he added to various articles?) -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 04:39, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Yet another article on a sit-com by Bhind45 that uses the same one-two comedy punch as Married... with Children (listed below): Shitcruft and Fuckcruft. Spıke¬ 11:57 20-Mar-11
Delete This is completely without merit. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:02, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I don't care if we have an UGLY template, I want to see this go NOW! --Scofield 13:07, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. If you guys insist. (talk) 19:09, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete.Doesn't seem to have an article. 1234~20:33, 20 March 2011
Man, you guys are giving Bhind451 some gut punches here, taking his total output one after another and huffing them. I left a note on his talk page trying to be friendly, what, should I invite him to the forum where we can all stab him? Okay, that could be fun, I'll sharpen my knife, which I call Ole Betsy. Aleister 12:37 20-3-'11
Yes, this latest was piling on, but it's just that his work is so...consistent. Spıke¬ 12:40 20-Mar-11
He hasn't tried - that's the important point. It's not as if he's doing the best he can and we're all cutting him down; he's come on here, been crude, then started vandalising pages. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:57, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Terrible article from the author of two recently deleted articles. Very similar to the other two, and had the ICU tag removed twice with no revisions. (talk) 05:56, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Unfunny ICU escapee. 08:59, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Maniac1075 has a much better version (and if you haven't read a maniac page yet and admired his chopping, it's probably a good example). I wanted to save this one, but then I made the mistake of reading it. Redirect. Aleister 11:08 20-3-'11
Redirect. If you really care about a person who types a space after an ellipsis; otherwise, just huff it. Spıke¬ 11:52 20-Mar-11
The space was used to separate it from Maniac's page, at least that's my guess. Aleister
Well, soon we won't have that need. Spıke¬ 12:34 20-Mar-11
Delete The kind of badness that leaves me.... mAttlobster. (hello) 12:03, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. SHIT, SHIT, SHIT! Don't you have anything better to say? --Scofield 13:04, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Not acceptable in its current state. 1234~20:31, 20 March 2011
Comments
And author spent last evening tagging six other pages with {{VFD}}, perhaps in retaliation for the VFD loss of Malcolm in Heaven and its equally ugly twin. If he should figure out where this page is, entire days of ours will be wasted. Spıke¬ 11:52 20-Mar-11
Keep. Will only be recreated, in worse form. Slap a hard rewrite tag on it. Simsilikesims 02:47, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
That's not a great argument. We could QVFD anything worse than this created. 08:58, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
It would be *constantly* recreated, plus the subject is notable. Some randomness is not an excuse to delete the whole thing. The images should certainly be kept. Simsilikesims 19:10, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
per simsilikesims. --~ 09:10, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Some edits for format. The page is very savable with some time, just have to delete some of the stupid and change bonana to banana, with other tweeks. The pics do it justice, and I like the random throwing on the page of the pics which somehow seems to work. I dedicate my vote for this page to Romartus. Aleister 11:23 20-3-'11
Idea How about we replace the entire page with that dancing banana from Peanut Butter Jelly Time? --Lollipop-CONTRIBS-WRITINGS-SHOP-Now adopting! 14:44, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)
Obliterate. Too much random, too little humour. 21:41, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
"A Bonana...is the bowel movement of a gorilla." Truly an article into which you can (and author did) dump anything; including, in two cases, two copies of the same illustration. Spıke¬ 22:08 19-Mar-11
Delete.. If we put a hard rewrite on it, it'll just encourage the idea that it can be rewritten piecemeal, whereas it needs obliterated utterly and then rebuilt from scratch. --Zarbag 10:30, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but that's just disappointing. 1234~19:38, 20 March 2011
Keep Comedy genius. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:00, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (6)
Not used in mainspace. Only two transclusions in userspace, both which seem to be abandoned drafts. 21:38, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. A sidebar sporked from Wikipedia, to which all its links still point. This is not even a joke template; it just doesn't belong on this site. Spıke¬ 22:09 19-Mar-11
Delete.All of the above, plus the wikipedia links are broken, too.Simsilikesims 02:58, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. This article is about some sort of class in Dungeons and Dragons. I can't see any really obvious humour or structure. 21:22, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Soax your head, Berk! Not quite English, encyclopedic, or funny. Spıke¬ 00:27 20-Mar-11
Not the place for that... er... whatever it is. 1234~19:33, 20 March 2011
Delete. The fact that it's written in coherent English and isn't smutty sort of chased people off this nom, I think, but... it's not funny, and it smells strongly of some kind of vanity. pillow talk 07:34, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Ok, I've thrown together an intro and a first section, and will rewrite more over the coming days. So I'm going to go ahead and vote keep (oh wait, I just did). --BlackFlamingo 02:59, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. If that Flamingo guy wants it, I think I've seen some of his work now and then and he may be able to pull it back from the dead. Aleister 11:47 20-3-'11
Keep The flamingo really wants this kept. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:35, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Guys, there is articles that are there and aren't of a good subject. But you don't put pages that have encyclopediac value and VFD them. Stamp a rewrite template on them. You wouldn't put Barack Obama on VFD. You wouldn't put God on VFD (he'd kill you and close this website down if you did). I have a good point, unless if the article actually really sucks. --Lollipop-CONTRIBS-WRITINGS-SHOP-Now adopting! 14:46, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Have you been drinking? mAttlobster. (hello) 15:30, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
May have hit his head. It wasn't me, though. The mallet is a coincidence. 1234~19:28, 20 March 2011
Delete and list on Requested Articles. Listy and poorly conceived. 11:45, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete.. We need a Mars entry but this isn't it by a long shot, listy and full of awful random humour. Best to trash it and start again. --Zarbag 19:39, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Or, maybe better yet, it could become a colonization candidate if kept, a frat candidate if huffed. Aleister 11:52 18-3-'11
Abstain. We don't need an article on MegaTexas; we ought to have one on Mars. This is equally disjointed but I don't mind it remaining in mainspace until someone can do better. (As a crap article inhibits some people from writing non-crap, I don't mind if it dies either.) Spıke¬ 12:52 18-Mar-11
Comment - I really didn't want to see this go so have revised the intro. Anyone want to run with it? --BlackFlamingo 18:04, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
It's too broad to mean anything useful. We could put just about every article on the site in this cat. (talk) 23:57, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
That's the point; congratulations, you have just deconstructed the joke. Seriously.... mAttlobster. (hello) 12:37, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. In my wanderings around the site I seem to have felt a pattern of special love for 1927. Either things that happened in 1927 or didn't happen in 1927. It was a very important year and a turning point in many forms of artistic expression and other fields of endeavor. Not to mention the 1927Yankees. So a category of things which did not happen in 1927 once again focuses attention on the importance of 1927 on the site. Mike Gazella would appove. Aleister 2:55 18-3-'11
This is silly, but it's a rather funny category to have on the articles with a year in their name (like the presidential elections). -- 08:45, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Keep One of my particular interests is things that didn't happen in 1927, so I use this one often. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:10, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. It's a sacred cow that's past milking.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:17, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
I've trimmed the category of some of its nonsense links. Aleister 12:18 18-3-'11
This category is genuinely hilarious. The text at the top is brilliant. The delete voting here is particually ignorant. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:48, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
I'm with the Lobster on this one. You have an incredibly interesting definition of "abuse," Spike. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:15, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Unfunny, private joke for an audience of one, currently squatting in the mainspace. To improve it would mean setting aside a good few hours..don't see it as worth it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:55, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I didn't even bother to read it past the first paragraph. --Scofield 10:47, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
You should look at the entire article, as one of our jobs here is to see if there's anything in it to salvage. Spıke¬ 12:50 18-Mar-11
A wholly-owned subsidiary of the planet Mars. Reader is informed early on that there is no comedy theme, nor indeed reason for a page on MegaTexas. Though not one-liners, the article is entirely unconnected Fun Facts. Spıke¬ 12:50 18-Mar-11
Obliterate. Random fantasy nonsense. 21:03, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. This is not quite English and not quite funny. Author Chrematorious successfully evaded the ICU police in November 2006, and then never contributed again. Spıke¬ 21:26 17-Mar-11
Both of these have ugly tags on them and should be deleted today anyway. (talk) 21:12, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
An ugly tag isn't, as far as my brain can tell, an automatic huff. It just says that the page may become a candidate for deletion, meaning it may go on VFD. Aleister 11:11 18-3-'11
Chief and ZB routinely with huff articles with expired maintenance tags. (talk) 15:12, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comment. I admit I did laugh at the title..shame the article gets no where near that promising header. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:41, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Incoherent babble. 20:56, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Looks a lot like the other one. We nominated this before, and I informed editor Bhind45 on 11-Feb of what was said on VFD, and of my separate problems with the article. He tends to erase comments from his talk page, and repair tags from his articles. Spıke¬ 21:35 17-Mar-11
Delete. Shit. --Scofield 11:08, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Bizarre. The author managed to write an even worse version of his other article. The only way is er..down..--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:43, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Not even close to bad enough. (talk) 20:55, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. If J wants it, keep. I'm really up to my face with things being huffed around here. If someone doesn't like a section or if that section doesn't fit, why not just take the time to delete it and improve the article instead of voting to destroy the entire thing? Aleister 8:47 16-3-'11
I do whenever the author points me in a direction, as of course you do too. An article with no evidence that the concept is funny, such as this, doesn't even deserve your exasperation. Spıke¬ 21:41 16-Mar-11
Bandwagon keep And yeah, this does have potential. --Scofield 11:13, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Bandwagon Keep Per above. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:28, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. --~ 15:09, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)
Delete. Article's concept is to treat the subject (a brand of birth control pills) as if it is a planet. The problem is basically that the contents and the effects of the drug are not well known, so none of the jokes are funny unless you painstakingly look them up...so it reads like any other fantasy planet article. 20:07, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Knowing that brand now, I can say that it relates to something, though not well. Except for a mention of hormones and "heat flashes," however, it is essentially ramble about a made-up place. The final section, on the religion of Yaz, was really pulled out of a bodily orifice. Spıke¬ 21:45 15-Mar-11
Test the power of this fully armed and operational battle station!! Fire at will!! Seriously, it's yet another made up place, one in which the most recognizable feature is a pimple (of all possible things in the Universe, WHY THAT!?) and the most important people are Dr. Phil and Oprah. Strongest Delete Vote Possible. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 11:06, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
GOD THIS IS FUCKING BAD!! -- 21:40, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Wait, the article is actually about something? O_o 1234~00:33, 18 March 2011
Kept and Spike can archive it. Or he could if he was... er... oh, shut up. 1234~18:43, 18 March 2011
Delete. Nonsense year numbers, nonsense history, and a weak theme. Never answers the important question: Why raisins? --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:12, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. This is very nearly Wacky War; and how many flavoured condoms were sacrificed to make Mister Potato Head wink in that illustration? Spıke¬ 03:13 17-Mar-11
Delete. Nonsense year numbers, nonsense history, lists and a weak theme. Never answers the important question: Why raisins? --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:12, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. 1st sentence isn't bad, but goes downhill from there (talk) 22:45, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. The topic is raisins. How many dumb and unrelated things can you write in two minutes? Spıke¬ 03:11 17-Mar-11
Delete. A sliver of an idea, filled out with nonsense and bloody lists. Crap. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:00, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! OMG, RAISIN LOVERS ARE A BUNCH OF PRETENTIOUS FAGOTS WHO BUM FOXES AND MUST BE DESTROYED. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:20, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
#Keep. I kinda like this one. It's know it's super-random, but since I devoted myself to the creedo of randomness, I actually find this type of thing funny in a juvenile sort of way. Although I admit it does need some photos and an excision of the T-Rex section. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.Rap sheet.His greatest achievement (and bizarre obsession). 01:46, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Paring down the list and deleting Sexual Tyrannosaurus is an unambiguous improvement. But I see you have adopted the creedo [sic] of crappy articles and have been drawn to the Dark Side of the Force. Teach you, I thought I had. Spıke¬ 03:08 17-Mar-11
Delete. Random, imageless and ugly stub. 21:09, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
A God Damn Sexual Tyrannosaurus. Just like me. I was preparing to explain "ugly" photos of Ventura by explaining that Ventura is ugly. But there are no photos here. Another thing there is none of is explanations of why the title refers to Ventura as a Cardinal, except once in the inexplicable final paragraph of the intro. Spıke¬ 21:37 16-Mar-11
Delete. Urgghh, too random for words. 20:13, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Weak Delete. I've seen random...er, but most of this is pretty bad. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:37, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Some of the quotes at the end have potential, but on the whole, this is terrifyingly atrocious. --Scofield 19:50, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Er... give it a new theme and it'd probably become an entirely different article. One with a theme. 1234~18:21, 17 March 2011
Comments
Someone who cares, please give this a better theme than animated GIFs. Suggest perhaps that he was the ex-Governor of California. Spıke¬ 23:07 15-Mar-11
Delete. It seems the author mapped monks into a role-playing game because he has no knowledge of anything outside the game. I reined in a few of the most flagrant deviations from the encyclopedia canon, but there is nothing much here but Fun Facts. Spıke¬ 23:14 15-Mar-11
Keep. This is actually a decent start for the Steroids article. It's a better start than what's there right now. We should delete Steroids and move On Steroids over to that space. pillow talk 19:28, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. per Hyperbole. --~ 16:04, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Too many weak reasons not too keep it, and to err on the side of the angels. Aleister 11:48 17-3-'11
Delete. I was having a really hard time deciding whether I should nom this article or Steroids, but this article's got a stupid name and possibly slightly worse humour, so I'll slap a rewrite tag on the other one. 18:19, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. The other one's better, and this one is almost empty. Merge what you can. Spıke¬ 20:17 14-Mar-11
And then the scary man eats it... the scary man should, anyhow. There's so little, and he's so big. But where's the abuse? 1234~15:06, 15 March 2011
Comment. I see what they're trying to accomplish. If done properly this article would be a dissection of a overused comedic simile X is like Y ON STEROIDS (example: a cello is like a violin ON STEROIDS). That joke, if you can call it such, wore out its welcome a while ago and is still a standby for lame comedy writers. If done right we could get a deconstruction of a joke that's past its prime, like The Aristocrats, unfortunately this is just a halfhearted, badly planned stab in the right direction.--Count of Monkey Crisco 09:26, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Surely not original humor, but it's funny enough. Spıke¬ 04:36 14-Mar-11
Keep. Rams bottom. Someone made a joke. hahahahahahahaha heeheeheeheeha haha huh? Aleister 18:03 14-3-'11
Keep. I don't hate any part of it. It's sort of OK. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:27, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)
...okay, I honestly forgot why I added the VFD tag, and looking at the article would take effort, but I'm sure I had a reason. o_O 1234~03:59, 14 March 2011
Probably the apostrophe at the start of the second paragraph. Spıke¬ 04:36 14-Mar-11
Delete. Stubby and not particularly promising. 17:25, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Kept. 72 hours and -1. pillow talk 04:20, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Weak keep. This is utterly juvenile and I don't like it very much. But it has a consistent concept, the prose is good, the comedic timing feels right... I feel like I'd be voting to delete this because it's not to my taste rather than because it's low-quality. pillow talk 22:19, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
In the gutter on an even keel, as it were? Spıke¬ 23:05 15-Mar-11
Delete (6)
General nonsense. Product having not read that thing. (talk) 21:04, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Unless someone wants to write an actual article here, I say we snuff this. 1234~01:30, 14 March 2011
Delete. There could be a concept along these lines: force-fit government to the iPod/iPad. (In fact, UnNews (notably Funnybony) toyed with this when it came out.) This author knows little of the workings of government and his instant humor of preceding everything with "i" (or "u" in Arabia) is trite the second time he turns to it. Spıke¬ 01:41 14-Mar-11
iDelete. So much iPod based humor on Uncyclopedia, so little good iPod based humor on Uncyclopedia. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:29, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Strangely enough, I don't find this deletion worthy at all. --Scofield 14:40, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Not bad enough, there are probably thousands of pages worse than this one to aim at. Aleister 21:15 13-3-'11
Delete (3)
Groan-worthy nonsense about a hypothetical weapon. 14:04, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
I laughed at "but now it can have three and the recoil can break your shoulder and paralyze you!" but everything else is so, so unfunny. This page isn't worth keeping. pillow talk 17:54, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Fixable. The concept is inherently good, but the current article provides virtually no humor beyond the concept. Some of the illustrations don't help either. Spıke¬ 14:59 13-Mar-11
I once called PuppyOnTheRadio the Simon Cowell of this website. I must now say that I was thoroughly mistaken. The title belongs to you, Coronium. --Scofield 19:21, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Who's Simon Cowell ? If he's someone who makes impulsive and stubborn judgements about things you're probably right. 21:39, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Cowell is the guy who tells American Idol contestants they suck. I claimed the title a year ago on my user page. Spıke¬ 22:07 13-Mar-11
Kept. Not enough interest in deletion to justify deletion. pillow talk 17:34, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. This is an acceptable stub. 14:00, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Could be brilliant. Stumbles out of the gate with overlong quotes. His theories of causation are dumb and less funny than the real thing. An article that broaches the theme of Class Warfare has to stay playful and not preachy. Spıke¬ 11:20 13-Mar-11
Keep. lol at the two pics and captions. Again, an intelligent page, well written in parts, and not nearly bad enough to huff. Could be worked on further, although not bad as is, imnho. Aleister 4:00 14-3-'11
Delete (2)
This could be brilliant, but the presentation of whatever it is is so poor I'm not even sure what it is. 1234~11:05, 13 March 2011
Delete. (Formerly Keep.) I gave a sardonic treatment to labor-management relations in Work (FA). I can't do anything with this, especially after an afternoon reading real people in my local newspaper make some of the same gripes about wealth disparity. This author just doesn't know why the boss should make more than he does--the boss can't know more, after all. Author couldn't make it funny--not with Bible quotes, not with <math>--and neither can I. Spıke¬ 01:53 14-Mar-11
Comments
Kept. After three days, it is clear that no one cares about deleting this article. pillow talk 17:33, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Some strange conflation of The Usual Suspects and stuff a third grader thinks is funny. Mostly ramble from 2006. Exactly as good as you might expect and article called Shithead Mcfuck would be.--Count of Monkey Crisco 09:19, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Delete the living crap out of this. Thankies. ---Ihave atalkingzombie 14:08, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
It tastes like squicken. It's not supposed to taste like squicken... did someone get noodles in the playdoh? 1234~14:59, 15 March 2011
Delete. And the intro dithers about whether the article's subject exists or not. Spıke¬ 16:18 15-Mar-11
Delete. The real Wrestlecrap.com is a modestly funny showcase of bad storylines and gimmicks in pro wrestling and it's still thousands of times funnier than this. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:44, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
It's so boring. Mummy, where are the scissors? I could make things more interesting. Bloody is interesting, isn't it? Good blood. Not the bad blood. 1234~15:12, 15 March 2011
Meh, I feel a bit irritated that you closed the nom. only just after 24 hours when there were more than twice the number of deletes than keeps, and you were in the keep minority. Can't we give this discussion some more time ? 20:09, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
Concur; it wasn't consensus by our rules, but it was moving in that direction. Let it play out. Spıke¬ 23:16 15-Mar-11
I don't make the rules, you guys. Granted, I might abuse 'em once in a while. But really, the rules shouldn't dress so slutty. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM00:12, 16 March 2011
As far as I can see he did nothing wrong. The rules clearly state
"Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
Typically a +5 vote is needed to delete an article." -- 00:37, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. That's actually pretty fucking funny. This is closer to an embryonic feature than to being delete-worthy. pillow talk 18:03, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (2)
A crazy and potentially amusing notion, it unfortunately doesn't do anything with it. It's just sort of there. And there's some stuff. Okay. 1234~09:36, 13 March 2011
A dud. The concept--kill the Pope with a cannon--fails. The execution fails too: Intro states the author's deliciously creative plan, and everything else is lists. Any repair would have to be a complete rewrite, and any time would be better spent anywhere else. Spıke¬ 11:02 13-Mar-11
The concept isn't "Kill the Pope with a cannon." The concept is "Since the Pope has to travel so often, just build a cannon at the Vatican so you can fire him to various other cities." pillow talk 18:04, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Misses the obvious pun in canon v cannon. The Vatican has plenty of canons in their legal department. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:24, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
I added a red-link for New Mexico's Pope Canyon. If our expert on armaments and Papism is on this one, I'll retract my opposition. Spıke¬ 10:34 14-Mar-11
Reworked. Vector calculus is a notable, real subject. I condensed the quotes; the intro is random and awful. But the sections, Grad, Div, and Curl--they should be comic-book heroes, and you've got an article. Spıke¬ 01:33 13-Mar-11
I'm confused. Are you saying this would be a good article if it was completely rewritten? Cuz that's kind of the point in deleting it. (talk) 01:37, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
I'm saying I'm working on it...that's all I'm saying.... Spıke¬ 01:48 13-Mar-11
Delete. Ugly and unfunny. -- 08:53, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Tell me when you're done. Meantime, keep working, Spikey-poo. 1234~09:09, 13 March 2011
I'm done. I claim it is keepable--and, regrettably, I don't remember enough vector calculus to contribute more double entendres, which would help. I let stand two regions of the original goofiness; they aren't side-splitting but have a little charm. Spıke¬ 10:54 13-Mar-11
Delete. Vector calculus and soup? Those douchebags even ripped off Hyperbole's avatar image! This calls for a huff! --Scofield 12:09, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
I am the douchebag who did that. If you can find a better avatar for the "Curl," feel free to substitute. Spıke¬ 13:11 13-Mar-11
Not that one, Aleister! Something with curls Spıke¬ 13:30 13-Mar-11
Delete. Per use of Hyperbole's avatar image. Why?:Why? Aleister 13:43 13-3-'11
Just not funny, sorry. I was hoping for a good Maths article.--Sog1970 17:54, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
I changed my mind again. 1234~18:34, 14 March 2011
Keepable/better if I cut out the goofy stuff in the vicinity of the two bulleted lists? Spıke¬ 20:51 14-Mar-11
It's more just the entire notion of the thing doesn't work. 1234~10:13, 15 March 2011
Kept. This whole nomination is a mess, so we'll err on the side of keeping it. If anyone feels strongly about it in a month, feel free to re-nom. pillow talk 19:31, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate that; went back and re-began the intro in a new direction based on misreading Wikipedia. Spıke¬ 23:18 15-Mar-11
Delete. We already have 
The Great Logic War
Keep. Seems well enough written, although could use a clean up and a SPIKE through both hands and feet. And it may be based on something true, wasn't there a war with someone a few years ago or was that something else entirely? 
Abstain. Apparently, this is one of those articles that cater to a specific audience. I'm not Jewish and I don't get it, so I can't vote either way. -- 
Burninate!
Umm... For! 
Goodbye. 
Smite. Do we really need Another Zork game? - 
Meh. It's not great, but there's nothing too terrible about it either. The opening joke about the French made me smile =P 
Ew... Very unfunny and just plain crass. NSFW, by the way. -- 
??? Umm, what? Is this a TV show or something? -- 
Comment. I admit I did laugh at the title..shame the article gets no where near that promising header. --
Test the power
