This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Weak keep - I don't think this is great, but as with so many nominations at the current time, it just does not feel bad enough to delete.--Sycamore(Talk) 10:26, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
As per Sycamore. Its not great, but its just not that bad, Aleister is right about the pic.There are moments of humour and I just don't see the point in deleting it. --Shabidoo 11:59, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (7)
Delete. I think the sole comment on this article's talk page says it all, this sucks. Mightily. --UU - natter09:53, Jan 27
The only thing of value on the page is the nice pic, seemingly made for the page. Maybe it can be saved somewhere. Maybe not. Aleister 10:01 27-1-'11
Delete.. Too stubby and mediocre to be allowed to live. Coronium 21:50, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
This article in a nutshell: Leetspeak, Army joke, rape, children, pedophilia, "some kind of moon", Pedophile assassins, pedophile gods, midgets, pedosassins, pedosassins, pedosassins, pedosassins, character is a pedophile, yellow afro. This is unfunny, childish, relies on pedophilia to supply the humor in its "jokes", and belongs on ED much more than here. The only redeeming passage in the article was the talk of some kind of alkali war, if that is indeed some kind of relevent joke that people might be able to get were it expanded upon. → I am greatSoup? 22:11 27-Jan-11 ←
Combine the fact that it seems to have nothing to do with anything with that it's just not funny, I think a deletion is in order. Perhaps then someone might write an article on the actual subject. 1234~16:56, 28 January 2011
Comments
That image is a logo that is on the League of Legends box. It wasn't made for the article.→ I am greatSoup? 22:16 27-Jan-11 ←
To further build upon a case against the article, it has literally nothing to do with the actual game. Lies can be funny, but probably the only thing mentioned in this article that has anything to do with the real game is mana. There isn't even assassins, and the game has nothing to do with escorting anything anywhere, which are the only other gameplay mechanics mentioned. Most articles here are parodies, and parodies tie into the real thing. That is the entire source of humor in a parody. → I am greatSoup? 22:31 27-Jan-11 ←
Delete. Little more than a hilarious re-wording of the Papa Roach song. Regardless of your feelings about the band, this "article" sucks. --UU - natter09:47, Jan 27
I was shocked to find out that this band is still around. --Roman Dog Bird 19:34, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
Not even that good of a re-wording of the real song. "Cut my life into pizza, this is my topping of choice" is a better version. → I am greatSoup? 22:38 27-Jan-11 ←
Huh? Also, if it's just a song, shouldn't it be an UnTune? How reworded is it? 1234~16:58, 28 January 2011
Keep. I'd like to see this one expanded - there's a lot of potential here.--Sycamore(Talk) 10:17, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
Keep Have to agree. As a one-pararaph article it has some very good lines, concepts, and unique twists. If it were just me deciding I'd slap a photo on it (I'll look for one) and leave it as is, and then link it to every page on wikipedia. Aleister 10:34 27-1-'11
p.s. Check out the wikipedia page, he's an actual guy and the page is a pretty good summary humorous summary of his history.
It'll do for a stub. Although if Aleister wrote the rest of it, I question his grammar. 1234~17:02, 28 January 2011
Delete (2)
Delete. Pointless little stub that should probably have been QVFD'd or at least ICU'd. As it wasn't, I invite you to cast your critical eyes over it. It won't take long. --UU - natter09:32, Jan 27
Delete. Since any re-write is going to change this beyond recognition, what's the point? Doesn't seem much here anyway. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:02, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
Actually the re-write kept the original first paragraph with minor tweeks, then added two paragraphs and a picture. Same story, just expanded to a savable size. Aleister 13:20 28-1-'11
Keep. I like this series, but the huge image on top detracted from it, so I am moving that one to the thumbnail and removing the edited one from the article. → I am greatSoup? 18:09 25-Jan-11 ←
Keep. One of the funniest ones. -- 18:24, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia is racist towards niggers. --Roman Dog Bird 18:33, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Nigger articles are almost always funny. There should be more cracker articles however, and a whole lot more gook, jap and chink ones while we are at it. --Shabidoo 18:55, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Seconded. --Roman Dog Bird 19:17, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
lol keep Just saw this up here. The page is actually anti-racist, did you read it? This was based on a fun night when we were all playing with the 92 vandal (I actually like the guy) who was pretending to be a white racist writing a page, and then a few people started to put Al Jolson all over his page, and he played along and wrote another page about "niggers" stealing his page (and that page should come back so the link on this one would work, and maybe an explanation too), when there were no blacks involved anywhere. It shows the stupidness of racism that someone would think Al Jolson was black, and that's the point. Sort of. And fun too. Aleister 19:37 25-1-'11
Keep. because I'm racist. --Mn-z 01:19, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I don't care if it was Aleister who wrote this. I find it to be stubby, racist, and rather unfunny. Also, it hasn't been edited for months (save for an attempt at vandalism which brought it to my notice). --Scofield 15:23, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I'm with Scofield in seeing this article as having little redeemable value. The My Sojourn series is fine, but this article is pretty weak as a member, documenting a virtual, not a physical sojourn, and being just plain unfunny. Coronium 16:35, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Being a virtual sojourn hardly qualifies it as a weak member, there are sojourns to AAAAAAA!, Wikia, Y, Uncyclopedia, Catagory:My sojourn, democracy, and several fictional places like Canada, there's even some to "BUTT POOP!", although they are in userspaces. And I don't find this one any less funny than any of the others. It is written with the correct formatting and wording, and makes just as much sense as the rest. → I am greatSoup? 18:16 25-Jan-11 ←
BUTT POOP!!!! has exactly 4 exclamation points, which makes it sparkle. --Mn-z 01:21, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
May the BUTT POOP!!!! forgive me for my blasphemy.→ I am greatSoup? 20:42 26-Jan-11 ←
Delete. It's still crap in my view but chances of deletion remain small. Still, only took about 100 years to abolish slavery..there is hope. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:52, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Hate to say it, but Delete unless it manages to link to anything that would explain the joke to someone who wasn't here (or paying attention) when the "Niggers stole my page" thing happened. pillow talk 23:39, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Tis a good point. The page was linked to the last line, then deleted, but it may not even be enough to bring it back. It may have to have a special template on the bottom, but that's considering the original page resurfaces. It was a fun night though, and this is one of the only remnants left from it. Like a hangover faintly reminds us of the fun we had the night before. Aleister 1:25 26-1-'11
Comments
Comment. - To be fair the reasons you've given only justify deleting the whole My Sojourn series - which would upset a lot of people who like them. If it's the race card then there are articles far worse than this should go. Do you have any other reasons?--Sycamore(Talk) 15:28, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
I don't mind racist humor as long as the joke turns the concept of racism on its head, and makes it sound ridiculous. However, this page just seems to be an angry, meaningless stub about some Internet invasion which, quite frankly, doesn't make any sense. The giant pictures of Al Jolson take up more space than all the text in the article. --Scofield 15:34, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
I'll leave the saying keep to the people who like this stuff, but these lot do have their place here... I guess. It's just one of the lot, unless folks actually want to trim down the lot or something. 1234~16:57, 25 January 2011
Because nobody could be bothered? I couldn't even be bothered to read this one... if I had, I might have actually voted. *emits aura of laziness* 1234~05:48, 26 January 2011
If this article is kept (which it will be), and the NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE isn't brought back, I will still find it unfunny and probably put up for deletion again. You guys have one month. --Scofield 14:06, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
I put language in the first paragraph to explain more clearly what's going on, and linked "Niggers" in a section-head to Al Jolson. Thanks for the push to improve this. Aleister 14:28 25-1-'11
Abstain I don't like this but I can't resist to that nigger picture. --~ 20:30, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
Author went and got himself banned for the time being, meanwhile this is still here, and not an improvement over what we have already... 1234~17:21, 26 January 2011
Keep. Has potential --Boatvan 19:41, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Wasn't that atrocious to start with. Added photo and some minor rewriting. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:18, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
Reads like an article, concerns a subject, I need a nap. Or coffee. Is there coffee around here anywhere? 1234~18:59, 24 January 2011
Keep. Save to Romartus. I got rid of the bickering quotes (leaving only the first). Would someone who knows these guys give the text a grammar check? Spıke¬ 19:17 24-Jan-11
Keep. Im not sure I get it, but fo sho not delete worthy --Shabidoo 18:55, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)
Delete. It doesn't really go anywhere. Unfunny. → I am greatSoup? 17:52 24-Jan-11 ←
Comments
Meh. It's got a long way to go, but it's not so damningly bad for me to support pressing the nuke eliminate button. Coronium 18:22, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
Actually, the nuke button is something else entirely. Well, I mean, it still deletes stuff, but it generally deletes a whole lot more than a single delete button could... 1234~18:59, 24 January 2011
Ok. I'll rephrase that. Coronium 22:14, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
"Not atrocious" and actually being a funny page are two different things. All it is is random lies and bullshit ending with a "discography". And I, for one, can't tell if the discography is even trying to be funny. → I am greatSoup? 19:01 24-Jan-11 ←
I am not saying it is the best at all and it is written by someone who is no fan either. However, the article wasn't gibberish and had enough structure to be worth editing/adding to. The discography is a bit weak and I have removed some stuff there. It won't be a feature either and whether it is 'funny' or not, well there's plenty of stuff I don't find remotely funny but it needs to be especially bad (i.e. randumbo indeed) or about something endemically useless (like the endless Pokemon and Grand Theft Auto stuff) for me to point an article towards the rotating blades...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:12, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. This game already has an ICU tag. Why pointlessly rush the deletion with an invalid nom when its gonna die on Jan 29th anyways? --Scofield 08:24, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
If you can, please check the history - it's more work for me of Cheif to archive stuff that are on ICU etc:-)--Sycamore(Talk) 19:35, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
He put the ICU there himself, mon. Probably VFDed it as well to get rid of it faster just to rid the clutter, or something; might as well. Anyhow, this shouldn't be an invalid nom for that. 1234~00:10, 24 January 2011
But it should - stuff less than a week old tagged is not for VFD. There was a whole (Pointless I add) drama before about this. Let's not simply be fractious for the sake of it.--Sycamore(Talk) 08:53, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, valid or otherwise, it is pretty pointless... wonder why he did that. I suppose I could ask, but that'd make too much sense. 1234~17:23, 24 January 2011
I first looked at it and said to myself "This is ICU - NRV" and then doubte myself as someone may have thought it was redeemable. I added to VFD and neglected to remove the ICU tag and then others starting voting keep because it has an ICU tag. I can't remove their votes even if I remove the reason as to why they voted, as no-one to date has said Keep because it has merit, just as a technicality. I still wanted to see if anyone was willing to try and make this a better game, and I don't want to remove the ICU tag just to wait until the vote dies to add it on there again. It would have been better if someone had said to me "You left the ICU tag on there" rather than voting to keep NRV, but shit happens. In short, withdrawing the nom for technical reasons. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009Monday, 21:18, Jan 24 2011 UTC
Keep. While it is stubby, and the intro is kinda unfunny, I like the lyrics they wrote... From what I can tell, after googling segments of the lyrics, both songs are original. → I am greatSoup? 23:40 21-Jan-11 ←
Keep Are you all really that desperate to delete articles so you nominate good ones? MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 15:49, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
Keepable am very much in agreement with killerfroggy --Shabidoo 18:55, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (5)
Delete.. Stubby and pathetically unfunny article about a band which never existed. Coronium 18:53, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Virtually unchanged since Toothpaste finished it and went away in September 2005. The poems have rhyme, but no rhythm. Intro is full of memes, including the entire membership of the band. Spıke¬ 01:03 22-Jan-11
Unless someone wants to turn this into something, it's currently essentially nothing - random and unloved, as it has been... for awhile. 1234~06:54, 22 January 2011
Delete. If anybody wants, they can make UnTunes pages out of the two songs, but as an article, this one is a goner. --Scofield 15:48, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. It's already clamped for being unfunny. Should be towed away.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:24, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Noooo, I edited this one a lot when I first started; it is really clean, has nice grammar, an infobox, and I slaved for like five minutes to make that map... or maybe I just stole it from the Massachusetts map on Wikipedia. → I am greatSoup? 17:15 25-Jan-11 ←
Keep. I dont see any reason to delete this. --Shabidoo 18:55, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Weak Keep Although a rather random article, I say this is at least plausible too some extent.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 23:41, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (1)
Delete. Too many Pokemon "jokes" and not enough real humour. Coronium 16:40, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Although, I will say that I didn't actually write it, I just cleaned it up from the steaming pile of shit it was before... I just think that it isn't worthy of VFD just because it is unoriginal and you don't find it funny. → I am greatSoup? 17:24 25-Jan-11 ←
Seriously ? What do you think of this gem: "Pikachu is not an individual but a species. And it can be made into a tasty snack food, a lot like Soylent Green but with less cannibalism. Also, it is known to hang around with the penguin species Uberpimpus Itllgetyadrunkus, at which time they get raging drunk and sacrifice zucchinis to Sauron, who happens to be Pikachu's old college roomate." Cruft, and unfunny nonsense to me, and that's pretty typical of the rest of the article. Coronium 18:13, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Most of the article isn't that bad, you chose what is probably the worst excerpt from it. As I said, it isn't some great shining star embodying the best comedic writing this site has to offer, but is that a reason to delete it? I agree that some parts are less funny, I already trimmed one section that I found particularly stupid. Is this really worse than about 90% of the site's unoriginal and over-repeated jokes?→ I am greatSoup? 18:30 25-Jan-11 ←
Yes, because it isn't funny. Coronium 21:26, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Neutral - Procedural comment: I don't see any {{vfd}} template on the article. (Looking in the history, it seems that it was never added.) May I add it, or is someone of more authority supposed to take some action? --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 08:53, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
Weak delete. Looked at it; can't say I read it. I can confirm both of the above observations, but will flip if someone convinces us there is hidden humor in it. Spıke¬ 00:19 23-Jan-11
Rather... crufty, to be sure. 1234~02:35, 23 January 2011
Delete. typical nonsense surrounding the game. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:10, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I really don't care about Aeris dying. Coronium 18:24, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
Boing? I didn't know the Chinese took over Egypt... oh, wait. 1234~18:06, 23 January 2011
Delete. Doesn't go anywhere. Performing quoticide would just make it more stark. This was Mr. Blood's swan song here, in April '07, except for fixing 1 typo in '10. Spıke¬ 00:49 24-Jan-11
Delete. A total failure. --Scofield 12:09, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. My criteria for VFD rests on whether or not there is a shred of redeeming value to an article. While not fantastic, this article is not VFD material. --SirSF13(Talk)GUNWotMRotMFBotMVFHSKMaj.ΥΣΣ2151 EST 20 JAN 2011
Keep. Usually I don't vote Keep for articles that insult the reader so much, because they tend to use insults in places they don't really belong. However, with this one, it is the point. The article ilustrates a specific archetype, describes what sets that person apart from everyone else, and stays on topic. I didn't find the bulk of the article very funny, but do find the concept humorous. → I am greatSoup? 20:49 21-Jan-11 ←
Keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep! --Shabidoo 23:17, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Daz funny! --Dancing dude 15:36, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. There is a concept here, hence this article merits a rewrite over deletion. --Scofield 15:44, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
Keep.. The concept is good, the execution is a bit lame, but not so terrible as to warrant deletion. It just needs love. Coronium 11:30, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Concept fails. The article continually nags and berates the reader. It's an amusing act for the author, but it surely doesn't amuse anyone else. Spıke¬ 03:38 21-Jan-11
pretty lame --Roman Dog Bird 06:06, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
I'm not seeing it. It's also just plain awkward to read, structurally. 1234~06:30, 22 January 2011
Delete. Can't see how this can be improved without a complete demolition. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:58, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
Comment. I read the wikipedia link. This story is lame but the concept of selling smelly Swedish fish that ferments in a can and is a banned food on many airlines is funny. I know in Iceland they piss on the fish and eat it later. Bjork admitted she liked the acquired taste. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:32, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
Incomplete for over a year. Has some potential but needs someone to take it over and complete it. Please only vote to keep if you are happy to redeem it. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009Sunday, 22:10, Jan 16 2011 UTC
Nom and kill Started to condense this and kept coming across red links and unfunny plot. Yet another text based adventure game that has no real humour to support it and belongs somewhere in the early 80's. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009Sunday, 01:24, Jan 23 2011 UTC
Yes. Also, the formatting is terrible. 1234~02:32, 23 January 2011
Delete. - incomplete, and the plot is pretty lame. Coronium 11:27, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
Save the template though! Coolest template ever. -- 18:02, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
For crying out loud, put the VFD tag on the page you've nominated! We already had an article kept just because somebody forgot to tag it! --Scofield 08:27, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
As for the game, it starts of pretty well, but is clearly incomplete. If anybody wants to come up and salvage it, I'll vote "Keep". --Scofield 08:37, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Major topic - needs a re-working. Just a hint to Hype and few others, the myth that putting deleted articles on UN:REQ means 50 plus writers will move in rewrite it is just that, a myth. What happens is a shrinking less well rounded wiki, and a bunch of red links. Topics such as this one should be kept, and if you are inclined to help around the wiki, please by all means, fire in there by clicking the edit tab at the top of your page.--Sycamore(Talk) 18:25, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
Keep I will rewrite this for PLS. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:40, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. This is horrible. Delete and list on UN:REQ. We deserve a better beard article. Hell, Guildy deserves a better beard article. pillow talk 17:53, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
Very random, no real unifying whatnot... where's the article, for that matter? 1234~18:23, 14 January 2011
Intro, while not good English, is promising and suggests several possible directions. Unfortunately, author shot his wad and had nothing left for the actual Sections. Spıke¬ 20:57 14-Jan-11
FYI--An article's title influences my vote. My presumption is that Uncyclopedia needs a page on Beard, or a Beard on Food, or something. On Bearcat cavalry, the page title is a punch line of a joke that Anon knows and the rest of us haven't heard yet, and might not want to, and the presumption--rebuttable as usual by good writing--is that the page should get the heave-ho. Spıke¬ 20:57 14-Jan-11
Obliterate. Like the article says, it isn't about anything. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:24, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
"It is nothing. Go away." Don't require the reader to type the punch line of your joke to read your article, and don't immediately blow the "encyclopedia" cover with trite self-deprecation. Second half is pure listcruft. Vague conspiracies are made fun of much better in many other places. Spıke¬ 18:12 21-Jan-11
poop poop poop pooop --Roman Dog Bird 19:53, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
Please vote on articles, not on people. Spıke¬ 16:25 21-Jan-11
Delete. In the author's own words: "Why anyone would compile such a list however, is a mystery." Spıke¬ 16:25 21-Jan-11
delete all of his articles yes --Roman Dog Bird 19:54, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. If someone is going to create a pokemon article he/she needs to actually be funny, because lots of people tend to be stupid with these concepts--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 02:45, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
Who wrote it aside, it's bad. Although some people are just bad, themselves... 1234~06:44, 22 January 2011
Delete. Just plain bad. --Scofield 16:20, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
Weak Keep I actually don't think this looks too bad. I'm going to wait around and see what happens to it. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:55, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (8)
Delete. Created in June last year and pretty well untouched since, this is short, listy, not funny, unloved and won't be missed. --UU - natter10:16, Jan 21
Delete. There is a lot to say about slot-car arcades, which paved the way for modern-day rip-offs like service contracts, 14-ounce pints, and laundromats; and I might say it, after youse get rid of this piece of trash. Spıke¬ 12:45 21-Jan-11
Change to delete. per Spike's replacement article. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:27, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
This is what happens when me and pikachu had the aftermath sex..... Filled with the usual Pokemon sex/gay jokes and unfunny bullshit. Pikachu is a much funnier and relevant article. → I am greatSoup? 23:31 21-Jan-11 ←
Insane Muslim rape.Pikachu is a one-of-a-kind, like AAAAAAAAA. This one is an article where the Pokémon world provides all the humor and charm and the author just weighs in with his cut-downs. Spıke¬ 01:14 22-Jan-11
We don't need two Pikachu articles I like the dragonballz pikachu image, but other than that nothing else is good--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 02:53, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
Weak keep - I don't think this is great, but as with so many nominations at the current time, it just does not feel bad enough to delete.--
Delete.. Too stubby and mediocre to be allowed to live. 
Heinz-Wolfgang Schnaufer
Good job, team!'→ 
Abstain I don't like this but I can't resist to that nigger picture. --~ 
Meh. It's got a long way to go, but it's not so damningly bad for me to support pressing the 
This aint just big poopy, its big shitty smelly poopy
Obliterate. Like the article says, it isn't about anything. --
