This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
How many crappy articles are there? This one has almost no relevance to the actual movie. Given that its sequel just released, we should celebrate by taking out this trash. --Scofield 15:29, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Yes, what was happening was that an author hoped that moviegoers would type in the title and be taken to his bag of Wibble. Five years later, a sequel is out and moviegoers are once again stumbling onto it, not much different but with a couple extra illustrations. Relates to nothing in the movie and is better off restarted. Spıke¬ 15:12 20-Dec-10
I dunno, this looks like it was somewhat popular and well thought out. Granted, it hasn't been played in five months, it looked like the designer(s) actually put some work into it and that it could be a fun multiplayer game. Perhaps moved to the forum. I don't know for certain about that specifically, but I am still gonna vote a keep. → I am greatSoup? 01:44 18-Dec-10 ←
Delete (5)
Forum stuff, maybe, but this should certainly not be an article-game-thing. 1234~ 22:26, 17 December 2010
Delete. doesn't appear to be a game, but rather a "parody" of a game. Its basically listcruft that takes too effort to follow for the randumbo-cliche "humor". Even if I want to play correspondence chess, this is not how to go about doing it. --Mn-z 04:42, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
Flipping. I don't think it is supposed to be funny or a parody at all. It is a correspondence game, but not chess in particular. Someone just added the chess part at the top for no real reason. I'm flipping because, although I still stand by the statements in my previous vote, realizing that it isn't even trying to be funny or a parody of any kind points out how it isn't really appropriate for Uncyclopedia. → I am greatSoup? 05:17 18-Dec-10 ←
Keep. Honestly, I think it is an alright idea for a game. I've played several of the games on there, and a lot of them with only a few editors seem to die out pretty quickly, or have deadends where the authors haven't gotten to yet. Whereas, with this game, the players are invited to rectify that with their own additions. While there would be obvious flaws, such as discontinuous plots, randomness, and currently a lack of formatting, I think it is no worse than more than half the games that are hosted that suffer the same problems. → I am greatSoup? 20:48 17-Dec-10 ←
Oh, I'm working on doing something about that, mon. The other just as bad ones will be found and brought here, of this I assure you. You could help. 1234~ 21:03, 17 December 2010
Well, if we're gonna start a holocaust against bad games, then I'll go ahead and flip. I guess I was just basing my vote off of the pre-existing standard. → I am greatSoup? 21:20 17-Dec-10 ←
Aye, that's the problem here... bloody namespace is just so bad. 1234~ 22:35, 17 December 2010
Delete (6)
It is an actual game of which the entire purpose it to create itself, inviting in all the idiots around to continue it. Needless to say, it sucks, it is horribly formatted, and it isn't even funny, unless you find bored people being bored to be funny. 1234~ 20:39, 17 December 2010
Delete. A completely pointless game whose concept is best left to the actual "Create a Game" option in the namespace. --Scofield 16:39, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. The day the leaders of Uncyclopedia come to me and say, "Senator, we need to delete EHC," I will vote to do just that. But until then, I will filibuster this shit. -- John McCain 02:24, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (13)
Delete. It sucks. I have to go. Can't say anything else. --M&M(christmas mood) 17:09, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. "Everybody hates chris is about cop named chris who is apeshit and tried to rape a chick but failed." Thus author Fuck wikipedia (later assisted by likely sockpuppet Smellmyasshole) begins an article (which no one will ever find without guessing the punch line). Everyone would like to write an Uncyclopedia article; but the rest of us know how to spell, know what paragraphs are, and know how to make links link to something. This author knew about actual infoboxes, only didn't have the patience to get any of them to work. If we really need an article on "Chris," have faith that a better one will magically appear. Spıke¬ 17:23 20-Dec-10
Kerkill EHC is a good show. This article sucks; the bottom half is pretty much copied verbatim from Wikipedia. I'd say a redirect to Chris Rock is in order. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 17:40, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.This article is unfunny, badly written, and looks ugly. This should be on QVFD it's that crap. - Another n00b 18:02, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
Dexter111344 is correct. Everything from the Characters section and down is all directly copied off of Wikipedia's List of EHC Characters article[1], while it seems that large portions of the Plot section are copied off of Wikipedia's plot summary of the novel Rising Sun[2]. It would appear the only original writing in the entire article is the introduction, "Everybody hates chris is about cop named chris who is apeshit and tried to rape a chick but failed." Anyone with half a brain can tell that that is terrible for so many reasons. → I am greatSoup? 20:22 20-Dec-10 ←
ANNIHILATE! (ANNIHILATE!), ALL WEEK LONG!!!!! --Roman Dog Bird 00:44, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. If everybody hates chris was a sandwich, it would be left uneaten in the gutter, then picked up by a homeless guy, who would eat it. Aleister 1:27 Solstice MMX
Everybody Hates this Article --Dancing dude 02:18, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. This is probably the only game I'll vote keep on. Having played SimCity a bit, I know from experience that you can never win. If a volcano doesn't pop up out of nowhere, then there'll probably be an alien invasion to turn the place upside down. O_o —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM00:25, 18 December 2010
Keep Per Socky, despite this not having any UFOs or volcanoes in it. Maybe one of the options can have the aliens show up after you lose just to vaporize the player? MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 02:00, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
While I admit that you are to my senior on this site, something I have learned on VFD is that reasons that equate to "it could be good" are hardly good reasons to vote keep. If you think it could be good, then you ought to help out at making it better. The original author hasn't touched the game in three and a half years, and the only edits since then were very minor and not structural to help the game, I really doubt he's going to suddenly come back to make the game better. → I am greatSoup? 02:10 18-Dec-10 ←
Delete (3)
It is really short. Doesn't really do anything, besides play on the old "hurr text based games make you die a lot" joke. → I am greatSoup? 21:53 17-Dec-10 ←
Eh, I fenced with this - as games go, this is incredibly well written and shows a lot more promise than most of them, hinting at things that actually were in the game itself. So many things that could go wrong, so much that... but... eh. It doesn't actually go anywhere with it, doesn't take anything into truly funny, and the last bits just end on HAH you're a moron sort of note, so yeah... delete. 1234~ 22:26, 17 December 2010
It's a complete time-waster, which unlike Game:You are Dead, isn't funny. --Scofield 08:37, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
I remember this from last time it was nommed. Apartment it is taken directly from the Korean uncyclopedia where it was an FA or something. Don't know, don't care, don't like. deleteSirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009Monday, 08:57, Dec 20 2010 UTC
Comments
I've played SimCity quite a bit, too, and while it does attempt to capture the difficulty to not lose (by having every option lead to losing), it does so poorly. There is exactly ten subpages to the game, and none of them go anywhere. In terms of game design it is complete and utter garbage. Even the attempt to reference the original game is hardly captured, because the original game could go on for hours and generally you'd have somewhat more of a city before monsters started stampeding right as a tornado hits your nuclear plant. I'm not saying the idea is bad, it is just executed very poorly. → I am greatSoup? 01:39 18-Dec-10 ←
Everything I leared from SimCity came in handy when I was the Governor of Alaska, you betcha! --Kip > Talk•Works•• 06:33, Dec. 18, 2010
Keep. mildly entertaining. Its not overly appropriate for this wiki, but its not something that a 12 year old with ADHD could write either. --Mn-z 04:33, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
Move it, if you must. But don't delete. --Scofield 08:44, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)
Okay, so... why...? I just don't understand why this merits its own page on Uncyclopedia, a text-based humour thing. Site. Wiki. ...Thing. Could move all of these onto one page of texty flash games or something, though... 1234~ 21:22, 17 December 2010
Keep. Some very good bits in that one. Needs work, not deleting.--Sycamore(Talk) 06:48, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Seems very savable and a good template for a fuller page. Edited a bit, and got rid of the stupidest lead pic on the site, so a couple good pics will take the page up a notch. And the possibilities are. . .endless. I'll do more soon. Aleister 22:45 19 12
"sodomizing small children and circus animals" The Star Trek holodeck as a porn vehicle is promising. As a plot vehicle is promising. The promise is tragically unfulfilled. Start over. Spıke¬ 02:40 19-Dec-10
"Easier to remove than improve" - Of course its easier to just vote to delete stuff rather than improve it, sadly this is not really what made us come to this site, neither historically speaking has it substantially improved it as much as rolling your sleeves up. I do hope that 2011 will bring a different more positive attitude amongst the community.--Sycamore(Talk) 18:46, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
At most it has a couple of sentences that could be salvaged... thing needs a complete rewrite, not just improvement. 1234~ 01:51, 20 December 2010
Keep. Que? This is not really that bad.--Sycamore(Talk) 21:31, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
Keep I echo Sycamore. Except for the que. I say "Huh?" instead. And those lines after "bad" and before the signature. I won't echo those. But everything else. A rather good page if some more work was put into it. Zombiebaron, where is thou? Aleister 22:49 19 12
Zombiebaron. I'm too lazy/busy to expand this any time soon. If anybody else wants to they are more than welcome. I think it's really funny. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 01:47, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
I'ma go with a massive Eeeh? on this one, except older revisions aren't as bad... so may as well keep. Still, huh? 1234~ 01:58, 20 December 2010
Keep. *Grins* --Magic Snow man☃ 04:11, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)
Obliterate. This has nothing to do with the well known demonized diety whom is male and is known as the Lord of the Flies. This is just unfunny Christian drivel. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:10, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Non-winning entry by Zombiebaron in the 2006 PLS went for Blasphemy Yucks, never arrived. Consolation points for piss-drinking and nonsense numbers. Spıke¬ 20:50 18-Dec-10
Delete. Since this is an Admin's work I guess it has a secret layer of protection to prevent deletion. It's still randumbo pants though.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:25, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
Weak keep. It has a theme, but serious execution problems. A belief in one's own inferiority can lead to mousiness (the intro) or grumpy attempts to make up for inferiority by dominating others (Section 1), and can lead to insanity (Section 2). A first-person article--an offbeat essay--normally doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, though we love articles "written in the style of the things they're about." The problem is that the various sections pull in very different directions. Spıke¬ 02:50 18-Dec-10
Keep.. It just needs some work is all. --Zarbag 15:22, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
For an uncyclopedia game, it is Ok. At least it has a Template, there are many Stupid games that have not been nominated =/ - Another n00b 23:18, December 17, 2010 (UTC)
Not bad, for a brain-dead gaming experience. --Scofield 09:08, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)
Bad spelling and grammar, jumpy flow and generally being insulting and/or stupid do not good funnies make. 1234~ 22:35, 17 December 2010
Played through the game. You can "win" by clicking the top selection every time. There's no other alternate wins or even different ways to lose. The template that Another n00b pointed out is directly stolen, down to the exact same formatting of the code, from GrueSlayer, which isn't enough to make it be huffed in and of itself, as I'm sure that template stealing is fine, but it just further shows a lack of effort. The game's point is offensive shock humor (blow up the twin towers or something lol), which is as bad as fart jokes. → I am greatSoup? 01:27 18-Dec-10 ←
Delete. short and not funny, and can't hold the reader's attention. Grues, references to the uncyclopedia, and "YOU DIE!" are not substitutes for humor. --Mn-z 04:44, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
Fuck This Shit. I played it, and it was stupid. Seriously, whats the point of it's existence? Smite this piece of garbage off of the surface of earth and into the firey pits of hell.--If you're 555 then I'mTalk What's it like to be a heretic? 04:57, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
If there are worse stupid games that have not been nominated, then nominate them or fix them, please. Saying that 'there's worse' is hardly an excuse to keep crap, especially in a case like this. I've been going through the namespace trying to get rid of the really bad stuff, one thing at a time, in no particular order, as part of what may or may not be a larger attempt to clean up the place. Chances are I haven't even seen the worst of it yet, but that doesn't mean this is what we want to have around, either, and help would certainly be appreciated in any direction. If, however, you honestly believe this should be kept on quality and/or humour standards and/or whatnot in terms of the site as a whole, then please, say keep for that reason; killing the entire namespace would be silly. But we have to draw the line somewhere. 1234~ 00:16, 18 December 2010
It isn't funny, and It is, (apparently) not with the "quality standards" of this site, and I see that more fanatical users of the site have an extremely specific view of "Humor", but Pick up the phone Booth and Aisle is not what you call the "Height of Hilarity" and that was featured, even if it was entertaining for about 20 minutes. Im am not saying the sight is a shit wiki, that's Illogicopedia. Go ahead and delete it, there's always a mirror site anyway xD - Another n00b 00:40, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
That is why we have votes, mon. To some, those were quite funny. Is this funny to you, then? There are, after all, few things more subjective than humour. 1234~ 00:51, 18 December 2010
Delete and redirect. Yup, author acts as though he has exclusive information on raptors and is going to share it with us in drips and drabs if we cooperate--heavy into encyclopedia clichés like "the following facts have been confirmed as correct by the government" to puff up his writing. Spıke¬ 04:01 19-Dec-10
Delete. This article is almost entirely dependent on random humor. Though it has a few good one-liners, it isn't funny on the whole. --Scofield 09:26, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Wears a randumbo badge with pride. Needs a 100% rewrite. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:45, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Random nonsense with no apparent central idea... reckon Romartus is right. 1234~ 01:48, 20 December 2010
Two things - one, again, why is this even here? This isn't... I dunno, deviantArt, or something. Two, it seems to be broken, or something. 1234~ 21:22, 17 December 2010
Yeah, broken flash or bad coding or something. → I am greatSoup? 21:34 17-Dec-10 ←
Unencyclopedic. "It is frankly a stupid highway..." Talks in first person, self-references, some bad grammar. The second section just kind of rambles on about some dull points of the history of a road. The few attempts at humor are feeble. Overall it is pretty unnecessary. → I am greatSoup? 08:18 17-Dec-10 ←
Delete. Your points are well-taken; when he gets down to documenting local color, the tone is a rant rather than good comedy. Various Anons including creator 72.145.248.242 in the last month have assembled a panoply of articles on highways, towns, and a mall in northern Georgia. Two weeks ago, I commented to him on Talk:US Highway 76. Didn't work. Spıke¬ 08:39 17-Dec-10
Unless someone wants to actually take it somewhere, what it here is not well written, stubby, and hasn't really improved since the IP removed Chief's ICU right after he added it... 1234~ 18:13, 17 December 2010
Delete. It is frankly a stupid article. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 18:31, Dec. 17, 2010
As the template indicates, we had a bunch of articles on the Interstates (but never the complete set). They were supposed to make fun of the anal articles on Wikipedia that have tables of every single exit. But there's only so many ways you can go with that, and VFD voted many of them out of existence. Spıke¬ 08:39 17-Dec-10
Delete. A very poor article which is way too short. I'd prefer if somebody wrote another article on Donkey Kong from scratch. --Scofield 14:03, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. I am on twin jihads against categories that don't categorize, and on cracking wise with the navigational tools. This category, however, does categorize. It identifies listcruft, either for repair or for VFDing, and I don't mind the dash of wit in it. In fact, authors might add listcruft articles to this category, either to get some second opinions before VFDing them or to expedite their journey here. Spıke¬ 03:34 17-Dec-10
strong keep its a maintenance category, normally filled by the transclusion of a perfectly valid and official maintenance template. I would prefer giving it a less verbose title, as it does somewhat crack-wise at the expense of efficiently conveying information, but this is uncyclopedia. These maintenance categories are supposed to have limited and shifting content, as articles (ideally) should be constantly fixed and removed this type of category. --Mn-z 03:56, December 17, 2010 (UTC)
I agree. Lists may be an easier way to write several things into a specific group of info, but it doesn't convey that information as well as actually writing it into complete sentences and paragraphs. This category should be used to combat that (and it looks like it has in the past). → I am greatSoup? 04:45 17-Dec-10 ←
Maintenance in Uncyclopedia style... whoooo. 1234~ 18:05, 17 December 2010
Keep. ^ What they said. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 18:29, Dec. 17, 2010
Delete (1)
Delete. Only three articles here, self-self-referental, bad templates, the list goes on and on. --Magic Snow man☃ 03:30, December 17, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Magic man, what I've done to this section title shows an easier way to nominate categories for deletion: just precede them with a colon. This is the way to tell Mediawiki that you want to refer to something rather than make it take effect. Spıke¬ 03:36 17-Dec-10
Drive-by - Ideally there should not be a debate on categories, if it is just nonsense (not like this nomination) you will have to go round and do the work to empty the category and put it on QVFD. If you are unsure You could come to the lounge rather than fill up VFD with nominations like this:-)--Sycamore(Talk) 08:38, December 17, 2010 (UTC)
If anyone was wondering, this is a perfect example of why I have declared war on the Game namespace, or at least its contents. Horrifically bad, stupid, and unfunny, and such. Gyeah. 1234~ 21:09, 17 December 2010
Delete. Wow, just played through the entire arc. A meta-game about playing an MMO in which you can only start one quest and get banned for trying to complete it. Hacking results in getting banned, and attempting to use most of the options on the initial menu result in death. Besides the terrible spelling and grammar, none of the endings make any sense. While it could be salvageable from those problems, it really don't need to be. It is a pretty bad idea for a game in the first place. → I am greatSoup? 21:28 17-Dec-10 ←
Delete. UR BANNED &/OR eaten by a grue LOLOLOL!!!!!!!1!one--Mn-z 04:31, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. There is very little in the article about the "Manatee people", besides the fact that they started out by a manatee having sex with a human, and have since then declared war on humans by killing minorities in rural areas, both of which are stupid prospects and, further, are not funny. Beyond that small bit of info, there are some terrible puns, and then it just goes into several lists that are not at all funny. → I am greatSoup? 20:02, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
Look at me, Ma, I'm writing an Uncyclopedia article! Intro wobbles into self-reference twice; initial photo once. Section 1 explains what a pun is. Author totally kills the humor by putting on airs to explain it. Spıke¬ 20:15 16-Dec-10
"Not to be confused with Humatees or Manans, for those following names are not creative and sound fucking ridiculous" "Nuclear Holocaust. self explanitory; may include a side effect of destroying all life in a Holocausted region" Those two lines were kinda funny. But this article still deserves to die. --Magic Snow man☃ 03:03, December 17, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. - I promised I wouldn't vote on the article if it were nominated on VFD. I didn't say anything on the subject of its talk page. XD --Kip > Talk•Works•• 17:58, Dec. 17, 2010
I don't agree with the decision to delete the article in the first place. 1234~ 18:39, 17 December 2010
Delete.Just one giant list full of the most randomness crap and sprinkled with memes. If any one wants to rewrite this, make one in userspace and do so. Otherwise, burn this garbage.--If you're 555 then I'mTalk What's it like to be a heretic? 04:40, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. While I agree that it could be good with (a lot of) work, it isn't good right now. A huge wall of lists doesn't make for a very good article, and the sparse chuckles pretty much stop right after the initial list. → I am greatSoup? 08:38, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Too much unfunny for the amount of funny. Ghuh. 1234~ 02:40, 16 December 2010
Keep. This is a topic we should have, needs rewrite, not huffing.--Sycamore(Talk) 08:30, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. I will delete the quotes, which will improve the page 40%. The article is Brit-funny, and needs more Brit to be even more Brit-funny. Aleister 13:17 16 12
Fixed. (Formerly Delete.) I don't get the joke, but two Brits (above) do, and we've done a copy-edit on the problems noted below. Spıke¬ 22:01 16-Dec-10
Delete. Article was created almost 3 years ago and little done on it since. Intro raises hopes that the article is about something (despite "It must be noted") but Section 1 explains that the lawman was "originally devised as a method of harvesting corn." There is an actual joke at the end of that section--commercial pressures on the name of an airport--but it has nothing to do with the Sheriff. Then: Bring on the lists! Spıke¬ 04:22 15-Dec-10Rescinded. Al has done what he set out to do, and I've addressed some of my own complaints on the page. Spıke¬ 19:48 16-Dec-10
Delete. Perhaps an article on the 'Robin Hood' Sheriff of Nottingham etc but that would involve a complete re-rewrite so unless anyone feels inspired, I am happy to see this binned. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:26, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
I rather like what little is there... but Sycamore should do this rewrite he speaks of. *shifty eyes* 1234~ 02:30, 16 December 2010
Keep. The section Famous People who live in Cul-De-Sacs is irrelevant listcruft. The rest of the article is okay. Spıke¬ 00:48 16-Dec-10
Keep. I don't like how the pics are on the left, with the captions running all over the page, and this seems to be a format every user on the site is using now. Aside from that, not a bad page. Aleister 1:57 16 12
That's happening to me, too... is it just a glitch on the entire site right now? I've checked the formatting, and it all should work as regular thumbnails. → I am greatSoup?
Keep. Not good, but that it has a point and seems to stick to it for the most part is good enough for me. 1234~ 03:17, 16 December 2010
Keep. Won't win prizes but not a shredding candidate. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:35, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Kind of rambles at times, but I laughed. Not badly written either. → I am greatSoup? 19:33, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
Cul-de-sac is French, but in contrast to the article, it has nothing to do with "white people." It is literally, "butt-sack." Yes, we are talking colostomy. Spıke¬ 00:47 16-Dec-10
Crap A religion for golf balls who somehow are alive, a prophet named Tom who gets abducted by a seagull, and golf balls having great telekinetic powers that keeps them from falling into holes. It this was a book for the mentally retarded, I would approve of it, but since it's not, then it's not worth any humor here. But I have to admit people these days are creative, yet half of them lack a sense of humor.--If you're 555 then I'mTalk What's it like to be a heretic? 00:10, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. The article exposes a key problem with Randumbo: When author asserts that God's name is "The Køll," I am not laughing; I am wondering what I am missing. Perhaps this article is about something--nah.Spıke¬ 00:21 16-Dec-10
Golf balls in the sahara... ye-es... doesn't even have layers to it. 1234~ 03:23, 16 December 2010
Delete. A stream of piss unconsciousness. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:40, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. As previously stated, creative, not funny... as a side note, I know Køll is a German rapcore band, but I really hope they aren't just making a reference to that as the name of their god, as that would give even less credit to their creativity. → I am greatSoup? 19:25, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Nominator is not the first to use VFD to pass judgement on Uncyclopedians rather than articles. But let's not. Spıke¬ 00:21 16-Dec-10
I wasn't passing judgement (or at least not intentionally) on the author, I was saying people like the author have creativity yet don't use it well for humor. It may not look like it but you can tell I was at least being positive on creativity (even if what he/she wrote was a piece of crap). Plus I don't pass judgements on other people because 1)people who do that are total jackasses, and 2) it makes me feel like a jerk.--If you're 555 then I'mTalk What's it like to be a heretic? 00:31, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Yeah, I don't really care that it's Pokemon, but this simply isn't well written and is just people making up stupid stories about her raping Ash or pokemons → I am greatSoup? 19:20, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. As opposed to the number of photos, the article has loads of topics, and does nothing with any of them: An Indian name, a corrupt black mayor, white flight, economic decline, extreme opinions on talk radio, awful weather, and let me tell you about my neighborhood (either crime-ridden or snob-ridden) and my school. Some topics worth expansion (Marge Schott, Chad Ochocinco) are dropped on the page like memes. Developed by blacks with a chip on their shoulder, and by whites with a chip on their shoulder, none of whom can write or even alphabetize--perhaps the biggest Cincinnati joke of all. Spıke¬ 12:49 14-Dec-10
Delete. In an album of instrumental songs, there are always one or two with pompous, long names, and these are the cuts you don't rip to MP3 files. This article is the same way. Every sentence uses gassy passives to put on airs, and that is before the fart jokes begin. We never find out what the "reciprocating contrivance" is. But it doesn't matter. Spıke¬ 03:40 15-Dec-10
Delete. Even the title of "Reciprocating contrivance", doesn't actually have to do with anything, let alone the entire article, which is just a long story about nothing with a few names tossed in. → I am greatSoup? 03:49, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. The title and what follows are unrelated and, more importantly, unfunny in all languages. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:21, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Seems like someone trying to sounds smart and not really succeeding. Resort to randomness, eh? 1234~ 02:28, 16 December 2010
Delete. Perhaps based off of the Web 2.0 idea, but we already have that article. That one employs the correct term for the concept, anyways. Unnecessary. → I am greatSoup? 03:55, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. While I don't like all the lists starting around the Multiplayer section, there is a lot of fine content. I don't think it deserves to be deleted. I think it could be improved, but doesn't need to be entirely deleted and rewritten. I don't play, so I won't go deleting a ton of stuff (unsure of what might actually be important aspects to the game), but several sections of lists could easily be deleted. → I am greatSoup? 03:26, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Removing my vote because I went back over it and decided that what isn't lists seems to be bullshitting, which may or may not be relevent. Due to my lack of knowledge of the game, I don't think I can make an informed vote, and if people who have played are saying it is terrible, then perhaps it is all irrelevent, IDK. → I am greatSoup? 18:48, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (5)
It's so bad it's scary. Um... What is this about? Call of Duty: Black Ops? Carl on duty: Black cops? Call of Booty: Black Cocks? Or all three? It's just not consistent! And even if it was it's just not funny. --Magic Snow man☃ 02:50, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Fucking Delete I love this game! I love it show much that I think its offensive to make a shit parody article of it like this. Purge it and let a profession writer rewrite it.--If you're 555 then I'mTalk What's it like to be a heretic? 02:53, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
You guys make a good point... But no. I can't keep vote this. --Dancing dude 04:04, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. So little redeeming value, so much... stuff. 1234~ 02:25, 16 December 2010
Comments
The game is huge at the moment. The shoops in this article are neat. I don't mind that the article can't consistently state the name of the game. I do mind that it goes on and on, until it degenerates into lists of one-line put-downs of this-or-that weapon, but that's easily remedied by aggressive cutting, which I leave to someone who plays this game. Two-month-old article is begging for a real owner with an Uncyclopedia name. Spıke¬ 03:00 15-Dec-10
Delete. The article has exactly one joke: Confuse Paris, Texas with Paris, France. That's about as funny as making a pun of someone's surname. But save the "Jacquelope" illustration. Spıke¬ 04:14 15-Dec-10
Delete. SPIKE, you forgot that it also makes a pun of someone's name, specifically Paris Hilton. → I am greatSoup? 07:00, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Good point. But that too is about as funny as a surname pun. Spıke¬ 14:29 15-Dec-10
Delete. I remember the film with Harry Dean Stanton but that's all. This isn't that, in fact it isn't anything at all. Even the abuse you expect with town cruft is missing here with this version. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:28, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
Besides massively unfunny, I have no idea what this is. 1234~ 19:07, 15 December 2010
Delete. He never looked back at the article. He just ran. The film's really good. This article isn't. Myocardialinfarction 03:36, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Meh, could be better.--
Keep. Honestly, I think it is an alright idea for a game. I've played several of the games on there, and a lot of them with only a few editors seem to die out pretty quickly, or have deadends where the authors haven't gotten to yet. Whereas, with this game, the players are invited to rectify that with their own additions. While there would be obvious flaws, such as discontinuous plots, randomness, and currently a lack of formatting, I think it is no worse than more than half the games that are hosted that suffer the same problems. → 
EXTERMINATE!
Obliterate. 
Game:SimCity and subpages
Unencyclopedic. "It is frankly a stupid highway..." Talks in first person, self-references, some bad grammar. The second section just kind of rambles on about some dull points of the history of a road. The few attempts at humor are feeble. Overall it is pretty unnecessary. → 
I agree. Lists may be an easier way to write several things into a specific group of info, but it doesn't convey that information as well as actually writing it into complete sentences and paragraphs. This category should be used to combat that (and it looks like it has in the past). → 
Salvageable. --
It's so bad it's scary. Um... What is this about? Call of Duty: Black Ops? Carl on duty: Black cops? Call of Booty: Black Cocks? Or all three? It's just not consistent! And even if it was it's just not funny. --
