This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Delete. It's talking about a language but there are categories like food, music, clothing. I don't know if It's talking about a language or a country but none of it doesn't fit there. Also too many red links. --M&M(also known as Mimo&maxus)What do you want?Wanna see my balls? 13:43, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. You can see there have been many cooks in this soup, some wanting to teach more than amuse, which also applies to the material on the language itself. The article does not seem to have a named owner who could work on the red-links and shepherd this page toward a humor concept. Spıke¬ 01:02 17-Nov-10
Wait a minute. Why is the time set at 12'clock November 18? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:05, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
I guess because one of the service's new users, despite his cool hand with the Photo Shoop, can't follow instructions and instead copypasted this entry from one of the existing ones. Hope he didn't simply want to give his nomination an extra 48 hours in the green zone. I've reset the {{Votervfd}} time to the time of his Delete comment. Spıke¬ 00:59 17-Nov-10
Don't worry Mr.SPIKE. I won't bother you again. This is the last time I nominate something for deletion if I suck so much. --M&M(also known as Mimo&maxus)What do you want?Wanna see my balls? 11:40, November 17, 2010 I just needed some advice
Keep. Nice topic, a few amusing parts. A good starting point for a re-write.--Sycamore(Talk) 17:14, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
hey man fuck you --Roman Dog Bird 17:55, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (4)
Delete. He's the least famous member of 90's rock sensation Nirvana. By Uncyclopedia logic "least famous" = least known = unknown = nothing known about him = might as well make up some random factoids and stuff. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:24, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Concept fails. Even if he existed, declaring at the outset that he didn't breaks the encyclopedia canon and makes the reader uninterested. Doesn't matter, because the only ones who get this far are Nirvana fans. And they get listcruft bandcruft. Spıke¬ 02:36 16-Nov-10
Delete. A central idea of inexistance, which, of course, isn't even a word, is already rather lacking. And there isn't much beyond that. And I have no idea what any of it is, anyway. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101118 - 01:36 (UTC)
Delete. Combo delete from dildictionary. It's a ramblin' wizard story about a dildo/lightsaber. Also:Penis. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:10, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Agh! Comma splices! Although if it was decent, I'd be willing to overlook that. But it ain't enough so to overcome the comma splices... ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101118 - 02:02 (UTC)
Author is creating an Alternate Dildo Reality, with potentially infinite articles written from the dildo's unenlightened point of view. Though this one is essentially listcruft, if the two shorter ones are huffed, I don't have a burning need to see this one go, and the title is cute. Spıke¬ 02:32 16-Nov-10
The worst combination Short and stupid. -- 16:48, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.(per Sycamore) You say short and stupid, I say stupid and short. Tomato tomaato. Aleister 16:55 17 11
Delete. Three-sentence article,[citation needed] presumably on a journalist from India who is not in Wikipedia, is a vehicle for exactly one joke: Overuse of the "citation needed" template. Spıke¬ 17:09 17-Nov-10
Delete.. I did like She loves animals but doesn't mind eating birds. but that's not enough to save it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:52, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
Very recent, and the IP is still doing work. Maybe more of a {{Fix}} case.--Sycamore(Talk) 17:11, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
Good catch. I didn't even bother with the history. You're a better user than I am, Gunga Din. Aleister 17:17 17 11
See? Mahafreed hasn't got the vfd template neither but no one says anything to Magic Man. --M&M(also known as Mimo&maxus)What do you want?Wanna see my balls? 17:21, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
I know you are but what am I? Aleister 17:22 17 11 (template needed, but this page looks like it just needs a construction tag)
Er... Well, it has now been here over a week. Is that enough? Not sure a fix tag is right, anyhow, as those don't get checked in the maintenance, do they? Meh, I'm confused. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101118 - 01:41 (UTC)
A Fix tag is checked after thirty days. I tend to want to give a new contributer as much time as possible, we've all been noobs once:)--Sycamore(Talk) 10:02, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
delete crapball that steals nonexistient humor--Poiz, teh Zork mastar! 14:09, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Maybe we don't want to have this nomination, no VFD template or good reason. "Crapball" is a bit like saying why don't you fuck off back to Downs School. Not really a great reason, but pertinent nonetheless.--Sycamore(Talk) 14:15, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
We're not going to have the same article on VFH and VFD. If it fails VFH you can nominate it again, otherwise let it run its course for now. ~ 14:55, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Step 1: Dildo - Step 2: combine as many words as you can think of that start in "Do" with the word dildo. - Step 3: Teh Komedy!!!!! This is one of those things that got old in four or five sentences. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:48, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I blame Nightmare on Sesame Street.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:01, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Wow... that's a lot of stupid, pointless dildoness. Also, it's not even done. Eh? ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101118 - 01:59 (UTC)
Dildo -
Uncyclopedia:Votes for dildos
left
This is better fit for Illogicopedia. They do have a banana in the logo, after all. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 05:19, Nov. 18, 2010
Keep - Worked for me.--Sycamore(Talk) 09:18, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (5)
Delete. More dildocruft, a randomish stub followed by a long and disorganized list. Written by User:Aditya Kabir who's had a hand in all of today's dildo related articles.--Count of Monkey Crisco 23:29, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
Dildocruft. The stubbiest, so to speak, of this crop of dildo-themed articles. Spıke¬ 02:29 16-Nov-10
Keep. Biggest laugh I had this day. --Handy Smurf 11:42, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (5)
Delete. If you took a dildo and beat someone with it until they incurred a brain injury, then forced them to write an Uncyclopedia article they would eventually write something like this in between concussion induced blackouts. Can't stick to a theme or format. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:22, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Free-association on the topic of Dildo. Spıke¬ 02:28 16-Nov-10
Delete. Though the photo from the pottery class was surprising. What were they actually making there? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:36, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. I like how the Count put it. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101118 - 01:57 (UTC)
Dutch Mink Farmer with Laser Beam Eyes.The Extra Crispy Photojuice is very mouldy and has a slice of DVDmilk secreted inside its middle nostril which is covered in cabbagefaces. It lives on the complete opposite side of the universe from Norway because it is allergic to it. It eats slices of cheese nailed to pieces of toast.It just goes on like that. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:00, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Yes, it does. And on and on. Spıke¬ 12:25 16-Nov-10
What the Fuck is this brainless bullshit? --Count of Monkey Crisco 05:30, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete.Gibberish. Someone smoking their underpants..arggggh!--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:27, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. "However, it was a very rainy day, so several million warriors died on both sides." If only some of author's exclamation points had perished. But this page is not Wacky War but Madcap Malady. Der Kaiser, you see, is a disease that turns people--gay! Get the picture? No theme. Spıke¬ 12:24 16-Nov-10
Delete. A stubby, bandcruft random implosion of stupid. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:29, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Count, you must be a fan of, what is it, Polaquia? to see that this is bandcruft despite the intense randomness of the intro. The sections are listcruft, plus trite transformation of song titles into one-liners based on puns, plus trite repetition humor. Spıke¬ 02:38 16-Nov-10
Delete. The Gospel according to St.Bollocks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:29, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Ugh If Beevis and Butthead could write articles, this is what it might look like. Heh heh. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 00:51, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Not sure but I think the joke here is that his name is misspelled. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:20, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Frawley is the personification of frumpy and deserves an article. But the panoramic alternate history in this one neither relates to reality nor gets funny. Dittoes Syndrome: Misspelling the name enables the line, toward the end, that this article is not about William but someone similar. It also keeps anyone from finding the article--surely the reason it's survived this long. Spıke¬ 09:18 14-Nov-10
Agh! The nonsense! My brain... trying to read... pain? Urrrg. It's a C thing. Programming... crap... with poisonous tree frogs... ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101114 - 05:17 (UTC)
Delete. An article that dives straight into a subject of which, I haven't a clue what the writer was attempting to say. End result as a mess anyway.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:51, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
Undecided. Page is about something real (a common "header file" used when writing programs in C), it's a well-formed Uncyclopedia article, and it's trying real hard to be funny, in a geeky way. My discomfort is the same as on encountering a page totally written in a foreign language: that the humor will be lost on a general audience. But many of our pages, whether on gaming or on politicians, share this trait. Spıke¬ 19:58 13-Nov-10
Userfy? That sounds like possible grounds for userfication. (The original creator was an IP, though, so whom do we userfy this to?) --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 20:09, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
More Jhonen Vasquez/Invader Zim-related nonsense. Delete immediately. --Roman Dog Bird 23:20, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
Well, the way it presents isn't really a problem, as I assume that's how the thing itself presents... if it actually went somewhere, it could even be quite good, perhaps. Problem is, it doesn't; the entire thing's just a list of characters. And that ain't an article. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101113 - 02:09 (UTC)
I'm sitting out further attempts to eradicate the Invader Zim stuff, as I don't know the source. I tend to think the authors are celebrating their own little world rather than writing stuff that's amusing to a larger audience--that is, it's gamercruft. Spıke¬ 01:32 12-Nov-10
Weak keep. It's a disaster of an article, but I think there's quite a bit of babby in that bathwater. I'd prefer to hard-rewrite tag it; as bad as the article is, I think this is a better starting point than an empty page. pillow talk 21:24, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
Barely salvageable. If it wasn't for my occasional watching of the shows on G4, I probably wouldn't be voting. Seriously trim the list down by a lot, and it should be at least an article that should survive VFD. --High Gen.Meganew(Stuff I've Done)(Chat With Me)(Get an Award!)FORCESENLISTMUN 02:51, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. +rewrite tag i hope help comes soon,--Poiz, look in my info? 14:40, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Aggh! Do I need to give a reason? Nah. This is just one of the many, should I say, "Hitler-related" articles on Uncyclopedia. Must be deleted. --User:TheCharcoalInpachi 17:38, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Not quite competent grumblebitching that never addresses the many mockable problems of the channel eventually segways into 99% unfunny list of an estimated 450-plus items. This article has its roots in 2005 and has been hampered by new additions being minor improvements to the inferior 2005 foundation. Disintegrate it and start anew. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:11, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
"Damn, am I going to get banned for saying penis?" Thorougly bad writing throughout, though UN:HTBFANJS bears contributory negligence for giving them the idea that repetition might be humor. Spıke¬ 21:20 8-Nov-10
Delete. I was going to give a proper reason, but then I saw the giant list and ran away screaming. Good day. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101110 - 02:04 (UTC)
Delete. A good example of 'er..I've run out anything funny to add here...I know what..A DIRTY LONG LIST! Hahaha..'. I hope those who want to save this don't just put it away on a shelf again. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:51, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Looks like the work of someone who has partaken certain substances in the hope it would make him funny.No. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:38, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Did you know that <name> once <verb>ed a <noun> with a harmonica? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:35, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Now that's just stupid. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101114 - 06:25 (UTC)
Delete. Intro ("After it's blazing success, the harmonica became cataloged as a WMD") puts reader on notice that there is no comedy concept. {{ICU}} in Apr-07 didn't work. Spıke¬ 09:12 14-Nov-10
Delete. The Academy of Stupid submits another essay. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:42, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Here's the background. In 1998 The band Barenaked Ladies had a minor hit with One Week, a catchy pop rock tune with some pretty odd lyrics and imagery. 9 years later someone decides to attempt to rearrange the lyrics into a cohesive story. If you're not familiar with the song it looks like a ramblin' story. If you know the song it might produce a feeble "heh..." of bemused recognition at the very most. I chalk this up to another case of "Yeah, I see what you did there." --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:50, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
"Like a chorus of a strange, wacky and slightly annoying song." I appreciate the background, as I don't study BNL lyrics, except unfortunately, If I Had a Million Dollars. As we had occasion to notice last week, to the extent this is humor, it is someone else's humor--including specific rhymes, in some cases. Spıke¬ 13:02 11-Nov-10
Keep. A playful little article. A light copy-edit will solve some of the Count's complaints. Spıke¬ 00:25 10-Nov-10
Keep. It takes time to come here, look at the pages, and write these things. Why can't we stick to VFD'ing the hundreds or thousands of pages which are obviously huffable, no redeming value, totally worthless. I could probably click on 20 random pages and find two or three of those. VFD'ing is a very worthy aspect of Uncy, and it takes time for everyone to do what they do. Appreciated (except for Butt Poop!!!, bring back Butt Poop!!!!! !)Aleister 1:31 10 11
Calm down; you were looking at the post-light-copy-edit version. What the Count nominated was plenty crappy. Spıke¬ 01:34 10-Nov-10
I've drunken three stiff drinks and calmed down (taken out ten tabs of vicadin for good measure). No, I didn't know that it had been edited, and it looks good now. A heads up would help when a page has undergone a good edit. Thanks for pointing out the difference. Aleister 1:54 10 11
Delete. It keeps threatening to become funny with a potential good concept but it immediately retreats to the randumb well for more wibble by the end of each paragraph. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:20, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Won me over with the line about maintaining a healthy relationship with the canary islands. Does need more, but entirely savable. Aleister 22:16 9 11
The thing is a subject usually needs a "hook" to hang some jokes on. The Phoenix Islands have two defining features 1) almost nobody lives there 2) they're full of rare coral and fish. Maybe the name is special but this is like one of the dozens of small, unexceptional towns which get deletable articles written about them all the time. The problem stands: what do you save? What do you write about? --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:28, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
I put in a few minutes on the page. Hopefully enough to help it along. Aleister 20:09 10 11
Added quite a bit more to the article. Has a little bit of a theme now. Aleister 2:48 11 11
Keep. The Q-and-A format is unencyclopedic, but Aleister has put meat on the bones of this legendary bird. For extra credit, how about a South Pacific template with which anyone will ever return here? Spıke¬ 14:45 11-Nov-10
Delete. I have no idea what they're going for, and neither did the writer. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:28, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Doesn't seem to go anywhere... certainly not following any logical order. I say give it a direction or... move it to Illogicopedia. I'd do that, but I'll probably forget by the time my ban runs out. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101110 - 01:55 (UTC)
Delete. Barely a few seconds of reading, with little to no redeeming concept whasoever. It basically "repeats" itself; Almost as if I wasn't going to know that was the problem. T.C.I 16:55, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Stubby but attractive article about some real (Arizona Island isn't) but virtually uninhabited islands, from the author of World Cup 4013BC. He alighted here two weeks ago for the first time since last January, and saved the World Cup article from VFD, but did not work on this. Needs more jokes. Spıke¬ 05:54 9-Nov-10
The Count states the key problem in his response to Keep vote #1: If you had a concept to liven this article up, why wouldn't you instead apply it to a page about a place that was at all notable? Spıke¬ 02:11 10-Nov-10
Keep. My reaction is similar to Chocorb's nomination of Palm Springs: It reads like a rant, but it doesn't rise to the level of deletion. It has a very long list of localities, with the bill-of-particulars against each one, but if each place had a page of its own, we might well find each one non-notable. Spıke¬ 01:42 13-Nov-10; formerly tagged Delete
Keep. Needs work, but when else will something like this page represent a section of a state? Not a bad page, and many people will look up their town to see what has been said about it, lots of little bits of data in there. Aleister 1:12 14 11
Keep. Doesn't rise to the level of deletion. If the tone were more playful, it wouldn't seem like such a rant. And we really don't need a listing of the city's TV channels; whatever is wrong with them is not specific to Palm Springs. Spıke¬ 10:45 12-Nov-10
Keep. I actually watched a couple minutes of the YouTube thing, and now want to yell at Wilytank, but will go along with his keep idea instead. Aleister 1:28 12 11
Keep. Eh, seems to read like an article, has order, yadda yadda, good enough. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101113 - 02:11 (UTC)
This is inherently funny. Because it shows the extent to which the author lacks a life and how he was probably abused by his parents. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM04:32, 14 November 2010
Delete. It goes without saying that all 12-year-olds on the Internet are "the worst person in the world." Still, every bit of humor in this stub comes from somewhere else. Spıke¬ 23:10 13-Nov-10
Delete. I see no reason for this to exist. For that matter, what the crap is Unquotable even for? ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101113 - 02:14 (UTC)
Delete. Dingus McBadwriter saw these words being used on CNN and decided it would be funny to arrange them into a list, then into a recipe. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:07, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Dingus McBadwriter, also known as User:Mordillo? Deleting admins' pages is always problematic, especially since they can ignore the decision and ban us all, but if I were 'Dillo, I doubt I'd want this attached to my name. pillow talk 15:38, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
On the other hand, going through the history, I almost want to keep it just to spite this Dmitriy Tarasov character. pillow talk 15:40, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Hey, it's one of those only-used-on-one-person's-userpage templates. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:21, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. deleted game relic apparently. --Mn-z 12:58, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Used only by Anatheron, who hasn't contributed in 2010, to create a black background with Windows-like title bar, to be populated separately. Userfy. Spıke¬ 13:16 11-Nov-10
Delete. Some rant about a lego brand. The article consists of a stupid story/introduction, a list with only one item, and no pictures. -- 01:39, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Four edits on 6-Nov are the only work of author TheKingofHyrule. The burlesque supposedly playing out in the Lego boardroom is unfunny; that the list has only one item is not the problem; the problem is that the author clearly intends to write listcruft thumbnail bios on all these new gamepieces. However, if he could be adopted and taught to write actual humor, rather than have his only contribution huffed, it would be a plus. Spıke¬ 02:28 12-Nov-10
I'd adopt him if he was up for it. I'd even repeal my delete vote, if he's not an ass-hole. -- 03:03, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
That is a good plan--now to see if his absence since then means he realizes the article wasn't going anywhere, or if he simply only edits on weekends. Why don't you withdraw your nomination and put the article in Intensive Care, which will provide for its deletion if he takes another week off. Spıke¬ 10:49 12-Nov-10
Nominator withdrew entry (by deleting box, restored by Sycamore and with strikethrough added by me); Sycamore attached {{ICU}}, and all three of us left a note for author. Spıke¬ 16:02 12-Nov-10
Keep. I just don't hate it. A video game that consists of "random swimming" is kind of an amusing idea to me. pillow talk 15:56, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. I just read this one. Very creative, the people in the country aren't allowed to have swimming pools so someone invents a computer hand-held game called Pocket Pool. Lots of possibilities if anyone wants to work on it, but fine as is too. Aleister 22:14 9 11
Delete. Aye... it could have made for a commentary on all those pointless sports games, but it just comes across as made up silliness and devolves into a bit of list. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101107 - 19:31 (UTC)
Delete. Rubbish that doesn't even get to the level of objectionable.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:50, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Awful article on Pocket Pool is written without any double entendres regarding the real-life pastime, by an author obviously too young even to be acquainted with the game pieces. Spıke¬ 23:11 7-Nov-10
Keep. The guy put too much work into this to huff. Ain't fair, ain't fair I tells ya. But nobody will ever read it, so no harm no fowl. Aleister 1:25 5 11
Keep. Not as bad as the others; it'll do for now. I wouldn't be against someone rewriting it, of course, but... ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101106 - 06:26 (UTC)
Delete. Send Duke Nukem after these guys. They won't stand a chance. -- Hanyouman 22:29, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
I'm going to agree with these guys and vote on delete it. It's just not very funny at all. -- Samurai Joe II 02:45, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Author is trying to create an alternate universe, like Hajime Socialist Republic, which may or may not be based on someone else's fiction. But if we don't nip this--nip it in the bud--we will get uncountable follow-on pages. Spıke¬ 03:05 6-Nov-10
Delete.Junior Uncyclopedia. The open air class for the coming winter term.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:00, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Nicely illustrated, but just not funny at all. pillow talk 16:03, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
Delete This is really quite bad. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:37, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Ha. There is a day when a n00b (such as I) must put one foot down and prove that there is crap in the world. This is indeed an instance in which that is completely needed. T.C.I 16:49, November 10, 1010 (UTC)
Delete. Okay, let me put out something more unambiguously bad. I think you'll be gritting your teeth by the end of the first sentence. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:27, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Intro is misspellings and overlong sentences stringing together all the tritest memes. Section 1 is listcruft based on nonsense year numbers. Sodium Pentathol (at least he spells it right in the title) is real; it having its own Day is not. So who needs this article? Spıke¬ 05:28 10-Nov-10
Delete.What's there is crap basically. Beyond redemption. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:46, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. Per Socky, Belgium. And who knows if anyone else will ever write a page about Dr. Demento, including the section on roly-poly fish heads. This guy was an important part of bringing satire to radio, and is worth a page, maybe not this exact one, but a page, and this is as good as we've got now. Aleister 19:58 4 11
Delete. Yet another unfunny article about a funny person; also, largely about Bart Simpson for some inexplicable reason. pillow talk 06:41, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Author was participating in a scavenger hunt of memes--from Mentos to the Simpsons to Saturday Night Live--the object not being to load them into the Flexible Flyer and return to base, but weave them into real sentences in a pointless article. Spıke¬ 18:56 4-Nov-10
Delete. I found it boring at best. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101106 - 06:11 (UTC)
Delete. Where did it come from, where does it go? --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:06, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
Keep. In an intro with a nonsense year number and strong evidence that author doesn't know what he wants to talk about, we get an encyclopedia cliché--and author saves the sentence: "Scientists still don't know why, much the same way as a duck's quack has no echo." Likewise throughout the article: One of the cooks in this soup is a good writer. "1939-1945--Some say these years weren't the best for humanity." But typoes and formatting abound, and the inventions is throw-away listcruft. Spıke¬ 12:53 4-Nov-10
Call me crazy but I'm gonna say keep on this one. Articles like these with their unadulterated insanity make me laugh.--PhlegmLeoispotter* (garble! jank!) 04:23, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Another article that is infinitely less funny than its subject matter; those just make us all look like assholes. pillow talk 06:26, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
Delete I couldn't even figure out what it was talking about until three or four sections in. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101105 - 03:57 (UTC)
Delete. articles about inherently funny topics are generally rather difficult to pull off, and the subject matter is not very notable. --Mn-z 13:06, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
Afrikaans
Delete. It's talking about a language but there are categories like food, music, clothing. I don't know if It's talking about a language or a country but none of it doesn't fit there. Also too many red links. --
Krist Novoselic
Comment.Umm...what am I? --
Feature! 
delete crapball that steals nonexistient humor--
Keep. Biggest laugh I had this day. --
Barely salvageable. If it wasn't for my occasional watching of the shows on G4, I probably wouldn't be voting. Seriously trim the list down by a lot, and it should be at least an article that should survive VFD. --
Meh. --
Obliterate. What? --
