Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive-2014-08

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

🔒 UnNews:Upper Peninsula of Michigan Declares Independence H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. "It is also rumored that France has already sent the King of New Canada their white flag of surrender in case of a future invasion." Hahaha so funny. It's sooooo funny & no stupid I'm going to say Symbol keep vote Keep. Symbol delete vote Delete. TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 10:41, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. This 2008 UnNews is not excellent; it is not based on real news (though it does concede that with {{Original}}) and is mostly ridicule of Michiganders and a rant about former Rep. Stupak. But it is not delete-worthy. Spıke ¬ 17:43 25-Jul-14
Comments

🔒 William Wallace H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. At first glance, it appears to be a well-written article. But if you want an article on William Wallace, this isn't one of them. This has a few references to the Braveheart character, but mostly seems to be some random work of fiction that features references to various celebrities. ConCass2 (talk) 23:06, July 30, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Superficially resembles an encyclopedia article, even though its substance is ramble, the author patting himself on the back for his wisecracks, and ridiculing the Scots for wearing kilts. I've gotten rid of the worst of that, the page is a suitable placeholder on which to graft real comedy, and there are several Scots on-site who might rise to the challenge. Spıke ¬ 04:01 2-Aug-14
    I've started a rewrite. If we want to make this funny, we're going to have to ditch the Braveheart and go for fallacies about the real Wallace. ConCass2 (talk) 19:35, August 2, 2014 (UTC)
    Excellent! but keep in mind that some of your fellows here in the Colonies won't know what is a fallacy — so include hints so that even the ignorant can see exactly how you are writing humor. Spıke ¬ 19:47 2-Aug-14
Comments

Bumblefuck H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A short walk from 2009 through memes, trite themes like Nobody Cares, and a big dollop of Retard Humor. Spıke ¬ 11:07 23-Jul-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. "Hitler came in and decide send everyone" is enough to make me vote "delete". The pictures are also really bad. ConCass2 (talk) 09:56, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. As above TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 10:33, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Very bad short pants article. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:31, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Hitler holocaust irrelevant comment yay! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:16, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Sir Crap Alot H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Crappy writing, plus writing about crap. Spıke ¬ 14:24 23-Jul-14
  2. Symbol wtf vote WTF? TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 16:10, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lamer than the lamest llama going. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:30, July 25, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:46, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:31, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Corpse H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lists. No humor. Spıke ¬ 12:14 24-Jul-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. As above TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 14:29, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listing and sinking rapidly. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:31, July 25, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is a corpse of an article. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:44, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't agree with Spike. The picture of Thatcher was hilarious but apart from that the article has no reason to be here. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:31, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Movie Star Planet H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Google retrieves a website called MovieStarPlanet, but by either spelling, it is not big enough to have a Wikipedia page. Anons recently have taken our article further in the same direction: Using this website to rant about fools and unfairness at some other website. Spıke ¬ 17:39 25-Jul-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. This isn't important, ergo we don't need this article that is awful enough anyway, even if it were important. ConCass2 (talk) 09:12, July 26, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:42, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Haven't got a clue what this is all about but it's an irredeemable mess. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:44, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:31, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 That kid at the mall H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: 1 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is too stupid for me to waste my words on TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 19:48, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Author has someone in mind, but I guess you just had to be there. "That kid at the mall can usually be found in big name stores like Sears, JC Penney, Target and Wal-Mart." Get it? Get it? Spıke ¬ 20:03 21-Jul-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Mostly a rant about kids who misbehave in malls or big stores. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 16:17, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. 17:16, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (3)
  1. Good idea for an article, but could use a lot more editing. ConCass2 (talk) 18:27, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Not a bad addition to {{Neighbors}} series. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:30, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep. I don't think this is that bad --Steveyt0 (talk) 02:31, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • The subject is valid and has a few reasonable lines but doesn't really move along in any direction. Not sure it's that bad but neither is it a feature in waiting either. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:34, July 28, 2014 (UTC)

Woof

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. After cleaning up this gassy article from 2006, it still has nothing to say about an invented disease. Spıke ¬ 09:42 18-Jul-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Doggone, please. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:10, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 10:35, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. TO HELL! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:16, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I agree with the above comments --Steveyt0 (talk) 03:09, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Sith Lord

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An article that I created in 2013 that somehow managed to servive this long. Its terrible. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 14:02, July 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The overview of real and made-up Darths reads like a fanboy review of life on other websites. As for the English: "Your favourite cyborg everyknows who chokes people interogating spies choking people torturing rebel spies and lest us not forget choking people." Spıke ¬ 14:08 30-Jul-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. It survives no more. Recycle those electrons! --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:30, July 30, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not humourous. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:31, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I agree with the above comments --Steveyt0 (talk) 02:34, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Nominator finally applied {{VFD}} so I reset the clock, even though nominator is the only person who needs "notification." I followed the initial template to its other users, including Forum:Picture will noy shrink [sic], where Modusoperandi wrote, "Templates, in general, are you saying that you care about a page, but not enough to put any real thought into it." And Mnbvcxz added, "any template that is a "canned joke" or states obvious useless information sucks. Basically, the same joke told 50 times is no longer funny." Spıke ¬ 17:01 30-Jul-14

Messenger

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An unfunny wasteland of cruft. Spıke ¬ 17:58 2-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Dismally unfunny. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:42, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Shoot the messenger! -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 19:46, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't understand how its supposed to be humorous --Steveyt0 (talk) 20:28, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Byeeeeeeeeee HoratioMan64 (talk) 18:55, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 Philips CD-i H T D Survivor Oldvfd

Score: 2 • voting closed
Delete (2)
  1. This WINNER article features a factual look at the console with a few wisecracks about WINNERS and other consoles. There is some banter, but instead of complete bollocks and warped facts it's simple plain sarcasm. If voting Symbol delete vote Delete. on such a WINNER article makes me a LOSER then so be it. ConCass2 (talk) 09:24, July 26, 2014 (UTC)
  2. “I wonder what's for dinner.”
    ~ King Harkinian on the meaning of life

That & ConCass' comment is enough for me to say Symbol delete vote Delete.. TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 12:33, July 26, 2014 (UTC)

Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Author EpicWinner "signs" yet another article with his WINNER/LOSER trademark, which is either an extreme inside joke or his candidate for a new and unneeded website meme. The article palpably wants to inform the reader more than amuse him. However, it's from earlier this same year, and EpicWinner is almost an active Uncyclopedian, who takes recommendations from others. So there might be a way to improve this short of deleting it. Spıke ¬ 12:45 26-Jul-14
    Agreed. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:31, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  • Anton199 tagged it with {{VFD}} and reset the clock. Spıke ¬ 15:46 28-Jul-14
  • Vote closed. Spıke ¬ 14:54 9-Aug-14

🔒 United States of Earth/States of the USE H T D Survivor

Score: 2 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is simply a list of the world's countries, and I feel that it has literally no comedic value whatsoever. Also it has not been changed since 2011. --Steveyt0 (talk) 16:00, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
    We have 30,000 articles, and lack of editing in three years doesn't render them delete-worthy. Spıke ¬ 16:24 7-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Mostly a tedious list without even a wisecrack per entry; simply names of places. In fact, I find the conspiracy/apocalypse introduction just as tedious, likewise as used in the parent article, but the parent article was featured. Spıke ¬ 16:24 7-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Mother of All Lists! Begone!! --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:26, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Just because it has something to do with a featured article doesn't mean a giant list can just hang around here. That's like getting away with reckless driving just because you're rich. ConCass2 (talk) 10:57, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I was going to write a long phrase about how I found the introduction (which is this article's main part) very funny, especially the "Amero" part, but then I found out that it's a subpage of a featured article. This, plus the humour of the page - so, Symbol keep vote Keep., definitely! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:28, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
    Is it really necessary to have this as a subpage though, even if it is from a featured article. It doesn't change the fact that other than a short introduction it is merely an enormous list of countries. --Steveyt0 (talk) 20:37, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
    Well, I don't know. You can ask Funnybony, the author of the article. I presume that if you've read the feature and are wondering what states are actually part of the United States of Earth, then you'll be interested in visiting this page. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 08:59, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
    Directly comparable to Peruvian slang, my first article deleted by this forum. It was a glossary to "assist" the reading of another page. It was irreverent but not funny. Spıke ¬ 13:03 8-Aug-14
  2. Keeper, because of feature status (a subpage is still a page of the article, imnho), and we have a long history of long lists of lists, and need more lists. Aleister 15:19 8-8-14
Comments
  • {{VFD}} attached and clock reset. Spıke ¬ 16:30 7-Aug-14
  • I see it as a joke against American Imperialism. Humourous in that respect. I'm going to abstain for now. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:31, August 7, 2014 (UTC)

🔒 Preteen H T D Survivor

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (3)
  1. Okay, last article for today I shall nominate. This isn't an article about Preteens in general, it's just an article about preteen girls. There's also too many rape jokes and..well..maybe I'm just boring, but I don't see what's so funny about this article. This needs to go. That's all I can say. There is also a picture of a young teenage girl in a bikini and rather questionable pictures of young girls, You can tell there's a problem HoratioMan64 (talk) 16:31, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
  2. It looks like a 70s pop star wrote an article. Whatever it is, it must be Symbol delete vote gone. ConCass2 (talk) 16:58, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I agree that the images are inappropriate, as is the general theme of the article, for this reason im voting delete --Steveyt0 (talk) 00:48, August 9, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Not delete-worthy! It has many comedy strategies other than predation. These include: The vague and conflicting definition of the age range; manipulative marketing to children; and pre-teen girls' naive obsession with fashion and acceptance. Reference to Tolkien's Lord of the 'Tweens with an actual passage from the trilogy was clever. Any article with this title will attract prurient edits; the usual remedy is to clean up the article, not delete it entirely. I'm happy to see pre-teen sexuality de-emphasized (though Pedobear should continue to get a cameo appearance). The article points to Preteen slut, which is much worse and ready to be nominated. Spıke ¬ 17:23 8-Aug-14
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Not a feature but not too bad to get dumped in my view. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:52, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
  3. PurpleDickVote Boner. Keep for the sake of keeping uncy uncy. Aleister 23:34 9=8=14
Comments
  • I see your point, Spike, but the thing is, the article, like I said earlier, is just about preteen girls, not preteens in general. No matter how many edits or cleanups may be made, It still seems rather off. I am also very concerned about the crude images being used there. Like ConCass mentioned earlier, an article with the title "Preteens" would make the reader expect an article about children showing off their "swag" and "style" and getting on the #YOLO bandwagon. Whilst it mentions the references to Twilight and the jokes about "Lord of the tweens", an awful lot of the article has references to rape and the vast majority of the article talks about sexuality. I forgot to point all this out, but then again, a vote is a vote HoratioMan64 (talk) 18:31, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
    A vote is not a vote. Granted that I haven't convinced you; but if I had, you are free to strike out your remarks and flip your vote; see the top of the page. Spıke ¬ 18:35 8-Aug-14
    Thanks for the advice, well actually I meant "a Vote is a Vote" in regards to "You have the right to vote" not "I hate you please agree with me". Sorry If my response to your vote was rather harsh. By the way, You can also nominate that article you believed was ready for nomination, sounds awful enough.HoratioMan64 (talk) 18:39, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
    No, I didn't take it harshly, but "a vote is a vote" did and does seem to mean you can't flip your vote, whereas we do all the time. Spıke ¬ 19:17 8-Aug-14
  • Upon further inspection I see what you mean about preteen girls as opposed to preteens in general. Normally, I'd expect an article on little kids who like to show their swag and style. This is just fucking weird. ConCass2 (talk) 17:01, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • Renamed from Preteens (the plural will still work). I toned down the child-molestation humor but have not actually viewed any of the illustrations. 14:53 9-Aug-14 Now I have. Yikes. Have removed one from the site entirely as suggesting child sex, incompatible with our Terms of Use, and having no inherent comedy justification; and have rearranged the others. A photo of smokestacks with a really clever caption might be funnier. Spıke ¬ 03:44 10-Aug-14

Preteen slut H Archive

Score: 6 • voting closed
Delete (7)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I mentioned this during the balloting of Preteen. Incessant rambling obviously motivated not by the desire to amuse the reader but by an infatuation with sex with children. Spıke ¬ 03:21 9-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Good Heavens, what is the world coming to? This can leave HoratioMan64 (talk) 06:57, August 9, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Highly inappropriate --Steveyt0 (talk) 16:45, August 9, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Just bad. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:03, August 9, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. There are much worse articles out there, but this still isn't good enough to keep. ConCass2 (talk) 11:16, August 10, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Symbol delete vote Delete. (See my comment for the reasons.) Oh yes, I think we are talking about different articles. Aleister, maybe you were referring to Preteen which was written by Miley? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:23, August 10, 2014 (UTC)
  7. Symbol delete vote Delete. Compares Hollywood stardom at a young age to slutdom. Does not get much further than that, and didn't make me laugh. Useful as social commentary perhaps, but not humor. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 10:45, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Sigh. Has uncy become an unthinking and unreading nanny state??? This page is a feature worthy satire about all the films in which Hollywood and other perverts made films about young girls that other perverts would like to have sex with. It's a satire on an entre genre, is well written, and makes its intended case very well. For new users, this page was written by a woman, a very talented writer named Miley Spears. If we huff this, good heavens, what is the world of uncy coming to? Aleister 23:30 9=8=14
    Hi. Horatio, I apologize about my last comments, kind of harsh. I was just blowing off steam at what I see as a cultural shift here which hurts the purpose of the wiki. I'll comment about this nommed page as the case in point. The author of the piece is a user named User:Miley Spears. Please study her page and links. She is a young woman herself, not very far removed from the pre-teen years (at least it appears so), and she wrote a wonderful satire which is a "turn it on its head" satire. The page means the opposite of what it says. She shows us that Hollywood has had a long term run of presenting young girls as sexual objects. That's a history which Miley Spears (and her name itself should give us a clue as to her awareness of society's focus on youth sexuality) - finds reprehensible. That's the theme of the page. To push what they've done into the reader's face, to shove it in there so deep, to show them, from their own disgust, just how reprehensible the practice comes across to Miley. Being a good satire writer she, through the vehicle of satire, is able to make the reader aware of this reprehensible pattern which is seldom talked about in polite society. That's what uncy is for, regarding some aspects of writing, to offer a place for authors to play in which publishes articles like this which serve exactly the purpose that they were written for. That's my personal take on it, and the author, who no longer writes here (a loss to us) may or may not agree with me. I think she would. So could you please at least read the page again from that point-of-view, and see if it at least is as valid as your present point-of-view. Thanks man, and my apologies again. Aleister 3:14 10-8-14
Comments
  • I'm afraid I'll vote against it. The author of the article is not Miley Spears but another person and her contributions to the article were not very significant, so that she doesn't even mention it on her user page. I wouldn't have noticed the Hollywood criticism aspect without Aleister's explanation, and to be honest I still don't notice it. What I notice is that the author (not Miley Spears) has a strange obsession with sex positions, which include children and that he is trying to rewrite various movie scripts to include sex with children. I don't see how this makes fun of anything. I don't understand how this is feature-worthy material. Aleister, it seems like we're talking about different articles here. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:21, August 10, 2014 (UTC)
  • I will leave this open a little longer, as I've asked Simsie for her opinion, based on her knowledge of the website's history, of popular culture, and of how to offend and how not to. Spıke ¬ 01:26 11-Aug-14

🔒 Need For Speed H T D Survivor

Score: -2 • voting closed
Delete (0)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I Like the Need for Speed series, And I found this page and thought I could save it. However, After pouring a lot of time into it, I've realized a) I have other things to do and b) Nobody else wants to help the page. It hadn't been edited in a long time. It is massively better than it was before, but I am not funny enough so it is still an unexceptional article. I also think nobody has any interest in it and nobody would actually look at it. Instead of marking for maintenance I'm voting it for deletion, because the obvious solution for funnyness, Need for Weed, Is yet another drug joke and gets old. I don't think its worthy of being saved, and is just a black mark on the glory of uncyclopedia. Rant over. Rocketsled (talk) 02:48, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. As I say on nominator's talk page, I feel he is halfway through his first major article repair and opened this ballot out of frustration. He has improved the article, understands exactly why the repair is not complete, and is exactly the Uncyclopedian to complete it. "Massively better than it was before" is the usual definition of a successful day at VFD. Spıke ¬ 13:41 11-Aug-14
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. I have put enough time into the article that it is now not worthy of deletion. Rocketsled (talk) 20:54, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

🔒 HowTo:Write a Country Song H T D Survivor

Score: 1 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A ranty retelling of the same stereotypes of the Southern United States. It might be possible to write this with cleverness. Spıke ¬ 12:56 10-Aug-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The article can be redeemed, if we remove the excess insults (the first are funny, but there is far too much). ConCass2 (talk) 20:48, August 10, 2014 (UTC)
  • Agree with ConCass. It just needs a tidy up and removing the red links.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:04, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  • Vote closed. No second in five days. Spıke ¬ 00:07 16-Aug-14

Welsh Cinema

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete.Follow-up to Owain Glyndwr's Footy Manager (also on VFD), which seems to be much of the same thing; badly coded gibberish (and not to mention excessive red links). ConCass2 (talk) 10:07, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. "Here is a list of movies you've never heard of — There won't be an Uncyclopedia article on any of them until I finish my personal story arc — and here is how stupid I think each is." Spıke ¬ 11:26 13-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. There are 36 dead links, and 23 working links. That is not a reason for deletion in itself, but it shows the quality of the whole article. Rocketsled (talk) 15:56, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lot of childish dribble. The author seems to think repeating 'Dai' can fill up an article. Dai-ire! --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:11, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. The low-quality images got my attention for a while... Apart from that, not much to see. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:57, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Soggy crackers

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A ramble about a random subject; followed by listcruft. The work of an Anon who did not even know how to code his lists correctly. I already reverted this back to 2009 (then added the recent interwiki to the Chinese); this is before someone converted it to a springboard to several YouTube videos. Spıke ¬ 01:36 11-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I agree with the dog with the stick. The one liners aren't funny, and are glaring one liners. Not even hidden. Rocketsled (talk) 03:04, August 11, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Its pretty stupid --Steveyt0 (talk) 00:32, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Just a rambling mess and one liner hell. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:06, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Terrible. Captain gull (talk) 10:30, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Svelvik

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. I personally think this can go, maybe there is a joke I do not understand, maybe there isn't. All I can say is that not even the other Uncyclopedia wanted it and that's saying something. I don't know maybe I just do not understand the article. What do you guys think? HoratioMan64 (talk) 16:19, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Written to inform, not to amuse. Wikipedia says that Svelvik is in Vestfold County, Norway, not of urgent interest to our readership. Much of the humor is in Norse, and the part that is in English is not in good English. No one here will know enough about Svelvik to repair this article or even to know what jokes might be made about Svelvik. Spıke ¬ 17:27 8-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. An example (and there are many here) of articles that basically say 'this town/city/etc etc' is shit. End of story. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:50, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't understand it either --Steveyt0 (talk) 00:44, August 9, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Written mainly by an IP or two or three, which does not bode well. (Here's your fifth vote btw.) -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 03:56, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Eleven Commandments

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I've looked through most of the sections and I still don't get what this article's topic is or if it has any. (I also can't find any good humor.) Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:42, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A surplus article: Themeless ramble about anything, making no point, as long as it's in the form of a Biblical commandment, or even if it isn't, have the author disparage himself. It is everything that's wrong with lists. Spıke ¬ 13:06 21-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:18, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Twelfth commandment. Delete with Extreme Prejudice. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:36, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Eh, I rather like it, but that's just because I'm an Illogicopedian and I have a soft spot for randomness. It's definitely too random for Uncyclopedia and it is now safe over on Illogicopedia. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 15:53, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Saved in 2007; not much changed since then except to add numbers between the numbers. Spıke ¬ 13:06 21-Aug-14

Owain Glyndwr's Footy Manager

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I wouldn't mind an article on a non-existent film, just as long as it's funny. Also, the title even misspells "Glyndŵr". Believe me, they're two completely different sounds. This isn't a good omen, and it is accurate in that. ConCass2 (talk) 15:56, August 6, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Taking nominator's word that no comparable movie exists, the page title is something no one will look up unless he exactly guesses the author's joke. (On the other hand, lack of a mark from a foreign language is not a VFD offense.) So, someone made a movie about Glyndŵr, who according to the Intro is either a person or a movement; it had a lot of slapstick that plays out best in the author's mind; and the movie "is shit." Unchanged except for tweaking of lists since Picton created it in 2009. Spıke ¬ 17:00 6-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I withdraw my vote to keep it, it would be need a lot of re-writing and it would be easier just to write a new article on Owain Glyndŵr --Steveyt0 (talk) 20:35, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
    I would be able to help write an article on Glyndŵr if you need any help. By the way, don't delete your vote if you change your mind. Just strike it out. ConCass2 (talk) 20:39, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Agh my eyes -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 15:46, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 22:51, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)
  • Symbol keep vote Keep. I looked up Owain Glyndŵr a few days ago, and this article appears in the search box. You don't have to guess the exact name of the article to stumble across it. I think the concept is pretty funny, however it is clearly in need of editing. I feel that it can be turned into a reasonable article with a bit of tweaking. Also I believe the article is loosely based on a movie called "Mike Bassett: England Manager". The preceding unsigned comment was added by Steveyt0 (talk • contribs)
    All right, you have shown that someone might "stumble across it" — notably, someone who was trying to stumble across it; but answer the VFD question: Is it a good article? Is it funny in the least? Is it at the best name? Spıke ¬ 16:24 7-Aug-14
    I think the concept (of Owain Glyndŵr being transported into the 21st century to coach the Welsh national football team ) is reasonably funny, however I do not think it's a "good" article as it is, I think it would need substantial editing. There is very little funny about the article other than the concept, I would suggest that it should perhaps be completely re-written. I would move the article to "Owain Glyndŵr", he is well known inside Wales, he's the Welsh equivalent of William Wallace. I don't find it unlikely that Welsh people might search for him, I did --Steveyt0 (talk) 20:18, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Dropping the Soap

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pure Anal Rape Humor. Spıke ¬ 01:48 16-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. ConCass2 (talk) 07:40, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Well, it can be expected with such a title. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:53, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Drop the soap on it. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 18:09, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. --Steveyt0 (talk) 03:02, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Symbol comment vote Comment.I am reminded of a scene in the Naked Gun films when Leslie Nielsen's character goes into the shower with steel armoured underwear. Shame this article isn't there with that idea. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:27, August 19, 2014 (UTC)

  1. Deleted 5-0. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 03:56, August 26, 2014 (UTC)

Steven A. Smith

Score: 6 • voting closed
Delete (6)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Short, stubby, listy - if this were an ICU article being reviewed after 7 days I would delete or userspace it. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:36, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. This ranty article on an ESPN sportscaster doesn't begin to convince me that he is notable, either in real life or in the cracked version. Most of the article is cheap shots; I can find nothing the "Nation of Islam" stuff relates to, and Wikipedia says Smith is "known for...dour delivery," not indeed SHOUTING. Author uses numerous external links to evidence to help him make his point. But — what was it? Spıke ¬ 10:39 25-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I agree with above comments --Steveyt0 (talk) 03:06, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. There is nothing here and it doesn't work as an article anyone could make more of it. Go. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:40, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. No pictures, three short paragraphs, and a trivia section. No purpose of it being here. ConCass2 (talk) 13:10, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Time for this one to go to bed. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 22:04, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Dan Kwon

Score: 1 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An interesting and deeply philosophical tale about a guy named Dan Kwon. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:44, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The page is protected, so could anyone, please, add the VFD tag to it for me? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:44, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  • Administratively deleted. A page containing only "I don't know who Dan Kwon is but I have arbitrarily decided that he sucks balls" (hint: Wikipedia doesn't know either) is not an Uncyclopedia article. Declares itself an official Uncyclopedia In-Joke, but is not in the official list. Spıke ¬ 12:12 28-Aug-14
    This was by the same author as Fisher Price, which is what makes it a bit of Uncyc history. And honestly I think it's a funnier article than Fisher Price. It's an in-joke in as much as you need to be in on the joke to know why it's a joke. And this is not a vote for or against, but an explanation.                               Puppy's talk page02:31 pm 28 Aug 2014
    Anon created the first draft of this, whose text was identical to the last draft, and it is not the same IP that created the first draft of Fisher Price. The above serves to say "You have to be one of us (actually, to have been one of us five years ago) for it to be funny," which is a fine rationale for any Delete vote. Spıke ¬ 15:16 28-Aug-14
    For whatever it isn't worth, I endorse Spike's deletion. It's a somewhat funny one-liner (and definitely more so than Fisher Price), but a one-liner nonetheless. Sorry Puppy. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 21:49, August 28, 2014 (UTC)

Dan Kwanzaa H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. I don't know what this article talks about, but I have arbitrarily decided - Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:47, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A copycat article of Dan Kwon. Spıke ¬ 12:12 28-Aug-14
  3. Contrary to popular belief, repetition of such jokes does not make them better; they just get stale, and often mouldy. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 17:55, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Considering this article only consists of 19 words it would have to be 19 very good words to be worthy of keeping. Needless to say, it is not --Steveyt0 (talk) 00:43, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. A Wizard Did it. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:31, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 Cutters H D Oldvfd

Score: -1 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Disturbing, in a not-funny way. Also simply not funny sannse@Wikia (talk) 23:43, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Quickly! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 23:57, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is a difficult topic to make funny to begin with, and it is a clearly failed attempt. No surprise. Phrank Psinatra (Talk) 04:11, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Shit. ConCass2 (talk) 13:11, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. and redirect to Emo. Captain gull (talk) 00:59, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Symbol kill vote Kill. Not funny, put it in the landfill. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:08, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (5)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I don't think this is that bad, I would possible remove the slightly graphic picture, but other than that I think it's fine --Steveyt0 (talk) 03:05, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. The Intro and one of the illustrations is downright creepy — and previews some individual horror writing that has no comedy hook at all. The old version (see Comments) is better, but the current initial illustration is better. Will merge. Spıke ¬ 13:38 27-Aug-14
  3. Spike made it better. I like the line about Emo Hitler's dog ignoring him because usually it's the dog trying to get the human's attention. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 00:28, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol keep vote Keep. I admit it's keep-worthy now. Capt. Gull (talk) 05:10, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol keep vote Keep. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 20:51, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • This is the last version that was entirely the original author's work, and it may be better than the current one. Or it may not. I'm not that fond of either, but I thought I should drop this here anyway as I think the large number of mostly IP edits has not done any good. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 04:07, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
    • I think that one is better, but I still see it as a pretty straight write-up of what people think about cutting, rather than a humorous twist on it. Hav a look at the second paragraph of the section headed "A few simple ways to avoid cutting", maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see a single joke in there. Much of the rest is the same -- sannse@Wikia (talk) 21:43, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
      Again, I've merged the various versions; be sure you are evaluating the current ("our best" version). A piece of the text you highlight (now a separate bullet), about tension build-up in younger teens (linked to Emo) is too subtle and I just cut it out. But I do see jokes in there, mostly the "humor of repetition" — especially when the author repeats "compulsive behaviours." It does read like a spork of a serious treatise, with not our best comedy applied to it, but not deleteworthy. Ridiculing various neuroses is fair game. Spıke ¬ 21:59 27-Aug-14
      • I'll admit it's better, although I can't say I laughed (sorry Spike), and can't bring myself to change my vote -- sannse@Wikia (talk) 17:26, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  • I have no opinion, but I want to demonstrate that I am showing an interest.                               Puppy's talk page02:33 pm 28 Aug 2014
  • Well done, but the intro should still be rewritten in my opinion. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 20:50, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
    Gave the Intro another touch-up; not saying it couldn't use more. Anyone who thinks this is deletable after my illustration-and-template pass may simply want to have a wiki with taboo subjects. Spıke ¬ 22:15 28-Aug-14
    You mean "without", dear. And we (almost) all have our areas where the balance of humor to distaste goes steeply in one direction or the other. I say "almost" because I miss EMC, but that's another level of distaste. Either way, I accept it's staying (the article, not EMC) -- sannse@Wikia (talk) 23:33, August 28, 2014 (UTC)

The Only Emo Holiday: National Emo Day H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Where is the humor? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:51, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A pointless article about a nonexistent thing; possibly written to ridicule but not to amuse. Spıke ¬ 12:08 28-Aug-14
  3. The spelling leaves much to be desired, and the humour isn't much better. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 21:53, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. No sense in trying to improve this one. Capt. Gull (talk) 23:09, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ends with a paragraph header so looks incomplete. Bagged the image so the rest can go. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:10, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

UnPoetia:Peter Lorre is a Zombie H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anon tries to make an article about Peter Lorre, but creates a poem instead. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:54, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. King of the website memes. Spıke ¬ 12:10 28-Aug-14
  3. Has no concept except that Peter Lorre is a fearsome zombie, and does nothing remotely funny with it. Mentions Chuck Norris, Mr. T and Oscar Wilde in the same breath in a failed attempt to make up for the lack of humour -- and, to add insult to injury (or the other way round), doesn't even have a proper rhyming structure. Feed it to the zombies. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 21:33, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Scared face It's so bad it's scary. What Anton and Llwy both said above, and it is a very bad, tasteless article that has barely been edited since 2010. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:02, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I know poetry is meant to be subjective but the clincher is that this didn't start out as poetry. Capt. Gull (talk) 22:52, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Nunavut

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Deliberately stupid articles are, well, stupid. And not entertaining. Spıke ¬ 00:26 20-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. It's a pretty original idea for a theme (it's written like an essay) but it's executed awfully, and the end result is little humour. ConCass2 (talk) 08:15, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. First-person stream-of-consciousness unfunny drivel. Captain gull (talk) 01:09, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. To make it stay it needs to improve but do we have any contributors that know this place??--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:57, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  5. There have been several different versions of this article, but none of them are any good. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs muffins) 00:16 30 Aug 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • It actually improves near the end after the earlier nonsense. Don't know whether to see if go or not. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:37, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
    I gave it another re-read, to the end, and I don't see it. Less navelism there but still nothing but Beavis-and-Butthead "humor." Spıke ¬ 13:15 22-Aug-14
  • This is an older version that predates the current 'bored teenager essay'. See what you think? -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs dogs) 04:27 29 Aug 2014
    Listy and still content-free, in my opinion. Spıke ¬ 11:04 29-Aug-14

Personal tools
projects