Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

🔒 The Last World War H T D Survivor Oldvfd Archive

Score: 2 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 468 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. In depth analysis, stage-by-stage using maps, of a made-up conflict that only the author cares about. Complete with made-up statistics like "123,456" as well. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:49, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote It is occasionally criticized for being slightly destructive. The intro--from which that sentence is taken--looked promising, but the descriptions of the conflict didn't do anything for me. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:27 11 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article about nothing keeps begging for editors' time to fix it up, while never inducing anyone to take control and make it funny. See also Comments. Spıke ¬ 12:05 13-Oct-14
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Sorry, but I found it funny, especially the maps. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:27, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I voted Symbol keep vote Keep last time based on Aleister doing work, a commitment that he says in the ballot he never made. I had been moved at the concept of the unknowability of a Last War; now I find the concept undeveloped and I think the bit about humanity going extinct and the author being a panda is dumb. Llwy is working on it, but the maps Anton199 likes suggest to me comic book, not encyclopedia; and the problem is the text, which needs a better comedy theme than "War so nutty!" Spıke ¬ 16:48 11-Oct-14
    All I did was fix some spelling and formatting, and I don't see myself doing any more; I wouldn't overestimate me. It's more readable now, but no funnier. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:56 11 Oct 2014

Good Electricity and Bad Electricity H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 440 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A tiny bit of pseudo-intellectualism. Might fit on Illogicopedia. Spıke ¬ 14:04 12-Oct-14
  2. Agreed. I'll stick it there right now. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:36 12 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. ConCass2 (talk) 10:13, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • It's well written. I'm inclined to leave it, so that it may pleasantly surprise those who stumble across it. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:19, October 22, 2014 (UTC)

Arsene Wenger H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 393 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I am nominating this to try to achieve improvements to, not deletion of, this article on the football manager by some editor Over There. I am not even sure whether getting thrown out of a cinema relates to anything. As it stands, the initial and recurring theme is Pedo/Anal/Rape/SexWithBlackMen Humor. Spıke ¬ 13:17 14-Oct-14
  2. Can't we just delete this? I don't see anyone stepping forward to help. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 21:32 18 Oct 2014
    We can and will, if we prevail in the vote. Spıke ¬ 01:27 19-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Something I could work on but this existing article is crap. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:58, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I'm not sure what's supposed to happen here, but you might be interested in this slightly more sanitary version. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:36 14 Oct 2014
    It is much cleaner, but it is also from 2007, and presumably omits comedy based on news in the last seven years — I assume there is some. Is there a Brit in the house who would like to do a merge? Spıke ¬ 18:11 14-Oct-14

Laptop H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 279 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Obnoxious teenagers who talk to their parents like shit were caused by laptops. This article begins with the premises that laptops are useful for viewing porn and are 'three dimensional magic box[es]', then goes on to discuss... essentially nothing. It has been almost the same since it was rewritten in 2007; prior to that, it wasn't much better (It is project with much effort, but it not marketable and usable. Then he exploded.). I have a replacement at User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Laptop. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 06:34 19 Oct 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Intro also has a list of memes and a junk acronym; pointless Section 2 is overwhelmed by illustrations; then nothing but listcruft until the trite finale: Laptops are actually alien lifeforms. Proposed replacement is not ready.... Spıke ¬  10:47, 19 October 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Detailed editing comments moved to replacement article's talk page. Spıke ¬ 17:04 19-Oct-14
  • Not sure if this is the right place to say this, but I've tried to follow your suggestions, Spike, and would appreciate it if you could have another look. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 20:08 23 Oct 2014

Igpay Atinlay H T D

Score: 3 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 275 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Replace. 1 gimmick, 0 jokes (may be more than 0 but it's too tedious to scan the article to see if there are jokes). Page title with gimmick applied to it ensures no one will search for it, or they will get exactly what they expected and will not laugh. Spıke ¬ 10:38 19-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. How the Hell did it not cross the author's mind that nobody can read this page? (Unless this is a prime example of the author trying to amuse himself out of confusing the readers) ConCass2 (talk) 20:32, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Replace with non-Pig Latin version, and probably move to Pig Latin (unless there's something there, in which case I'm not sure what we do). I am no scholar of Pig Latin and I find it about as bothersome to read as do Spike and ConCass, but I found the actual content somewhat amusing. I strongly encourage anyone whose main or sole criterion for voting delete was its unreadability to read the English version and reconsider. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 22:53 20 Oct 2014
    Changing above vote to Replace. That was a fun read. How can anyone on a humor wiki prefer a page that is merely a perfect encoding? Spıke ¬ 22:55 20-Oct-14
  4. Replace b Replace. or something. The actual content is pretty good and the main problem seems that the article is hard to read. It would be good if it was replaced by Llwy's "translated" version, but the original should probably be kept as a subpage and linked to in the See also section, because there are people who will actually find reading the page in Pig Latin more amusing than reading it in English. Also, the page doesn't have to be deleted at all: the original one could be kept where it is now, and Llwy's version can be pasted at Pig Latin... Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:19, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
    And you don't need a vote of VFD to replace a redirect that doesn't delete an Uncyclopedian's substantive work. But I won't flip my vote anyway; I don't want the gimmicky version to exist, because editors spend time polishing the codification that they could spend writing funny stuff. I recently tweaked HTBFANJS#Pages that look like the things they're about to be a little more disapproving; for instance, to cite only articles that have more than a gimmick, versus articles that pursue a gimmick unusually well. Spıke ¬ 16:31 21-Oct-14
    Have moved the plaintext article to Pig Latin, replacing the redirect. Spıke ¬ 23:49 23-Oct-14
    We could also have the Pig Latin and English versions side by side in the same article, with a table or something. That seems like enough of a compromise to satisfy everyone to some extent. In any case, I hope we preserve the history instead of just deleting the thing and moving 'mine' on top, because the real authors should be given credit. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 22:47 21 Oct 2014
    No, please! We ought not put fairness to previous authors on a par with having an article hang together and look good. A link is OK, for readers who really want Pig Latin in Pig Latin; but presenting him with multiple versions at once distracts him for the sake of someone's vanity. Spıke ¬ 13:55 23-Oct-14
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I think it's kind of cute. I got a laugh out of it. Granted, it's a little hard to read, but I think it should stay in Pig Latin -- it just seems totally appropriate. Snarglefoop (talk) 22:43, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

🔒 Igpay Atinlay H T D Oldvfd Archive bis

Score: 1 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 166 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Having moved the plaintext version to Pig Latin, replacing the redirect to Igpay Atinlay, do voters still want the article about Pig Latin in Pig Latin to go away? I do. Spıke ¬ 23:49 23-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If we have the article in English, having a duplicate in unreadable Pig Latin is stupid and unnecessary. ConCass2 (talk) 12:58, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
    As I said above, I think we should have one. I found reading the page on Pig Latin in Pig Latin quite amusing and very Uncyclopedia-like past-time. I know many people who will actually laugh when they see it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:09, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
    Does it imply that no future Uncyclopedian should edit Pig Latin without (groan!) keeping Igpay Atinlay in synch? Spıke ¬ 13:15 25-Oct-14
    I think that's going to be up to the editor who will want to make any changes to Pig Latin. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:30, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. OK, Symbol keep vote Keep. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:14, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Could it be a subpage maybe? (I have no opinion.) -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 02:13 24 Oct 2014
    In fact, it could stay right where it is, though I'd rather it not. Spıke ¬ 10:18 25-Oct-14
  • As per what I said in the first nomination, I think we should keep it somewhere. If it stays right where it is, it should have a link to the plain English version right at the beginning, however. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:25, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
    That would be a Symbol keep vote Keep. Spıke ¬ 10:40 25-Oct-14

That Guy You Hate H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 269 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Gay humour. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:51, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A non-encyclopedic chat about no one. The title plus the template ("This page...is completely worthless") plus the Intro ("let's do some quality bitching about that little fucker") should keep the reader from reading further. Spıke ¬ 17:07 19-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote I'm gonna tear off his Penis and use it as a toilet plunger. Yet more disgusting gay-bashing. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:47 20 Oct 2014
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Strangely, the profanity knocks back the humour and makes the article less funny. But the subject has potential for a good page and doesn't look like something thrown together by an anon in 5 minutes. ConCass2 (talk) 20:36, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
    You mean it has potential for a good page, but it isn't one right now? If it's not good now, it shouldn't remain in its current state. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:47 20 Oct 2014
    I mean it can be redeemed with editing, without having to rewrite the whole page. I just couldn't word it right. ConCass2 (talk) 20:29, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Short Circuit H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 261 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. No redeeming qualities. Spıke ¬ 00:21 20-Oct-14
  2. With an article like this, I can't imagine that seeing the movies would make me think any better of it. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:55 20 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nothing but sex. ConCass2 (talk) 20:12, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I'm not a fan of humour about sex but the immature part of my brain did make me laugh while reading this and I can't vote to delete something that made me laugh so I'll vote to keep. We ought to cater for all humour types as long as it is a parody. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:06, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Just wondering of you've even seen the movies, Spike? --ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 03:45, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
    I have not. I was not evaluating the movies. The Uncyclopedia page is a start-to-finish Anal Sex Joke. Spıke ¬ 12:12 20-Oct-14
  • Yeah, try watching them!--ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 23:45, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
    No offence but... you are saying that the content of the movies somehow justifies the article's consisting entirely of sex jokes (and no, Spike, it's not just anal sex)? I can't really see that. Perhaps you could summarise the plot points you were parodying, for the benefit of us lazy bums who can't be bothered to watch the movies? -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:53 20 Oct 2014
    Actually nevermind--I read Wikipedia's article, and I really can't see either the value of turning it into one long sex joke or the attributes of the movie that inspired you to do so. Sorry. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:58 20 Oct 2014
  • I still recommend watching the movie so you know what you're reading about. I can't see any reason someone who doesn't know what an article is about would find anything funny about it if they don't get it. If that's the case, I could spend the next week adding VFD to so many articles on this site.--ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 09:41, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
    I know perfectly well what I'm reading about, as I said above. I could guess what the movie was about from your article, actually. There is nothing that can justify turning it into what you turned it into. Nothing. Besides, the article shouldn't require intimate knowledge of the subject matter to be comprehensible; if it does, and if many readers haven't got that knowledge, it probably shouldn't exist. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 13:38 21 Oct 2014
    Yeah cause alot of people just read random articles they know nothing about. My point is, it's not funny to you few people, yet the ones I showed it to found it pretty funny indeed. I just don't agree that the small majority of voters against something is able to rule out an article as being unfunny, just because it's not the type of humor they enjoy. So what it comes down to, is if it doesn't please you couple of people who have time to vote for peoples work to be deleted because you don't personally like it, that means it should not exist for those who do. right? I dunno, maybe it's non Australians not getting Australian humor? Too bad there is no Uncylcopedia.com.au I guess.--ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 15:33, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
    Seems a large dollop of short pants to me but suggest you ask Frosty or PuppyOnTheRadio as they're from the Land of Oz for their views. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:15, October 27, 2014 (UTC)

Owl H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 238 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Wow, I just... don't even know where to begin. This article is almost entirely random nonsense; it barely has a concept--that of documenting and/or parodying the O RLY meme, which probably won't go over too well with some people here, and I'm not fond of it either--and that's only after I cut out a lot of it. Prior to my edits, it really was about nothing. A much more cut-down version may be found at User:Llwy-ar-lawr/scratchpad, which I'm still not too happy with (though you are welcome to say you want that as the replacement). I feel like we should have an article on owls, but I have no clue what it should consist of, and it's certainly not what we have now. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:30 20 Oct 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nominator cleaned it up a lot, but it's still a ramble. Spıke ¬ 13:27 21-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:27, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Nude figure-skating H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 202 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A dumb ramble. Spıke ¬ 11:41 22-Oct-14
  2. Fails to live up to the wonderfully silly premise of being naked in a situation that so clearly calls for warm clothing. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 02:24 24 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Doesn't deliver. Defrost. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:00, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

UnTunes:At First I Was Afraid H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 104 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The author is treating a tricky topic, because getting blocked on Uncyclopedia has been treated and re-treated by many different authors, successfully or not. (Consider UnBooks:The sad fate of the banned users who escaped into a Sock puppet or Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal, for instance) Unfortunately, this article adds no humour value to dozens of other pages and isn't particularly funny, all in all. But it has good rhyme. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:10, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. No, it is Gaynor's original that has a good rhyme. This article reminds us that Christmas is approaching and, with it, marketeers' belief that tweaking a carol into a jingle is the world's least-heavy-lifting method of gathering a commission. (To be picky, he was actually blocked from Wikipedia, but documenting one's reaction is navelism, not good comedy.) To boot, author signs his work, and apologizes in-line for not creating an audio. Spıke ¬ 14:23 26-Oct-14
  3. This poem is so straight. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 15:49 26 Oct 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote Nope. ConCass2 (talk) 10:41, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

George Foreman Lean Meat Fat Reducing Killing Machine H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 103 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Was linked to here from Alice in Chains, and as it turns out, lots of articles link to here as well. There may be some in-joke I'm not getting, but I'm not sure. ConCass2 (talk) 14:27, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
    The many links are because it is used in the template at the bottom of the article. If deleted, I'll fix that. Spıke ¬ 14:36 26-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Except for a goofy name no one will look for in any encyclopedia, the article offers little humor beyond the concept and a contrived acronym. Spıke ¬ 14:36 26-Oct-14
  3. This article is so bad, Uncyclopedia is going to take your name off it and toss it in the dustbin. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:24 26 Oct 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Finland (Facts) H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 55 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A themeless and endless list of "facts," vanity, and inside jokes (including Finnish-language jokes) beckoning Anon like a Sandbox beckoning a passing cat. UN:LIST says that pages that are "nothing but lists" can be deleted administratively. (My recent enhancements reworded this rule but did not create the rule.) However, Rangeley created this lump of listcruft in 2006, so we ought to vote. Spıke ¬ 14:21 28-Oct-14
  2. I'm sorry, was there a point here? I seem to have missed it. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 10:04 29 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Some of the "facts" were funny, but they should be written (in non-bulletpoint format) into the article on Finland. ConCass2 (talk) 10:18, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

The Who: My Re-Generation H D Featured Tag article

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 35 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Even though it's a featured article, it's an exact copy of much of the page on the Who. ConCass2 (talk) 10:38, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The FA is in better shape than The Who, which I would vote to delete and redirect to the FA. Spıke ¬ 10:46 29-Oct-14
    I think it would be a better idea to paste the contents of the FA into the Who, since it is unnecessary to have. ConCass2 (talk) 21:44, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Think fast, douche-fag! H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 31 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The reader is a douche-fag. Haha! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:29, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Rants at the reader. Spıke ¬ 14:47 29-Oct-14
  3. Think fast, douche-straight, or we'll delete your article! -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 01:18 30 Oct 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Nobel Peace Prize H T D

Score: -2
Elapsed Time: 31 hours
Delete (0)

#Symbol delete vote Delete. Listy, quoty and not funny. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:30, October 29, 2014 (UTC)

Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I rewrote the Intro and Anton199 and I have been slimming down the table. Already keepable. Spıke ¬ 17:42 29-Oct-14
  2. Symbol keep vote Nomination withdrawn I agree - it's keepable. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:51, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Having just written Malala Yousafzai (and had a hand in Barack Obama), it might be good if this page became a sort of Disambiguation Page to our articles on actual award-winners. Failing that, it should be deleted as it is a huge list whose entries are name + wisecrack. Spıke ¬ 14:55 29-Oct-14

A Midsummer Night's Dream H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 31 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The author was asked to fix this article, but he never did. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:38, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Currently a long list of characters with author's opinion about how crappy each is or how little anyone cares. Could Romartus attack this one? Spıke ¬ 14:57 29-Oct-14
    Could do.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:07, October 30, 2014 (UTC)

🔒 Jizzlam H D Oldvfd Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 25 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Did I already say masturbate? Indeed, this article consists almost entirely of masturbation, with a few references to religion around the edges that aren't clever enough to make it funny. User:Nikau/Jizzlam does it much better. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 20:32 29 Oct 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Replace. Nikau's version is far better; see its nomination at VFH for further discussion. Spıke ¬ 20:36 29-Oct-14
  3. Replace b Replace. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:24, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. An attack page that targets Christianity more than it does Islam. I could be wrong as far as "more than" is concerned, but the article is waaay too tedious to read through and judge entirely (which makes me doubt the VFH template at the top is genuine). ConCass2 (talk) 15:18, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Replace b Replace. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:06, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • This is probably the wrong place to say this, but Talk:Flying toasters isn't much better: The images on {{delete}} and {{VFDn}} are shot. The latter one especially bothers me because they have a practical use--as links for doing various things to the article. Since they're just letters, perhaps they should be replaced with regular links to avoid not only inconveniences like this one but potentially overzealous ad blockers. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 20:36 29 Oct 2014
  • Deleted and replaced. Spıke ¬ 22:14 30-Oct-14

That time I was nearly raped by an Oscar Wildebeest during my sojourn in wherever Oscar Wildebeests come from H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 11 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sorry, Mhaille, but I really think the My sojourn formula here spoils the humour more than it benefits it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:44, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another copycat article from our Era of Imitation. Spıke ¬ 11:23 30-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Considering how many "my sojourn" have ended up in VFD since I've joined (and all have retardedly long titles), can someone explain what they are? ConCass2 (talk) 15:20, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
    I answered on your talkpage. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:23, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. The sojourn series is almost as bad as TYATU. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:05, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Supergirl/classic/short H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 7 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't get the point of this page. We already have Supergirl and even Supergirl/classic. Also, not funny. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:36, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Cannibalism/mutilation Humor? Pages need subpages of subpages? Spıke ¬ 14:44 30-Oct-14
  3. We do not need to melt our readers' brains. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:02 30 Oct 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Flush away. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:03, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects