From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.

Rules and procedures:

Before doing anything else, make sure that you are well versed on Uncyclopedia's deletion policy.
1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
2. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
3. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
4. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so may invalidate the vote.
3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
1. Thank you.
2. No, really, thank you very much.
3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a *
  1. * - Creates a bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the *).
  2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
Do not revert edits of the administrators.
If you are neither an administrator nor a designated poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.

VFD: Where bad articles go to get recycled.

Pages for Deletion

Shortcut:; UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD; Votes for deletion; Intensive Care Unit
	del log

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nailbat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Uncyclopedia In jokes.

How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):

Check Special:DeadendPages, Special:LonelyPages and Special:UncategorizedPages. Often many articles can slip through the cracks of ICU or QVFD and remain on Uncyclopedia for very long periods before someone randomly stumbles upon them. Editors sometimes also keep useful lists on user subpages.

Notes for Administrators:

Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if nessessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.

Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

If VFD is full, or if you are an IP or a user of less than 4 days, and you want to report something as potential rubbish for us to vote on in the future, please proceed to the Poopsmith's Lounge. Just remember not to sit on the chairs.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.

Lil Wayne

Keep
Delete	Delete. Written like an ED article with no humor unless you hate him as much as the writer.---Pelargonium (Talk) Delete. "Not all cultures are the same, and they are not equally good at everything," and this author's culture cannot even poke fun at a rapper with creativity. Andorin, the Rabbi, and the Chief Justice have spent a lot of time reverting anonIP edits to this article, though the article would make it hard to call anything vandalism of it. Spıke ¬ 18:50 5-Dec-09
Comments

Gravitation

Keep
Delete	Delete. Crappy article written by yaoi fangirls. ---Pelargonium (Talk) Delete. Sex. Gays. AIDS. Masturbation. Rape. That's a total of one joke. Spıke ¬ 18:43 5-Dec-09
Comments

Rydia

Keep
Delete	Delete. FFIV hatecruft. ---Pelargonium (Talk) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:21, December 5, 2009 (UTC) Delete. Spıke ¬ 18:35 5-Dec-09
Comments

User talk:Spang

Keep
Delete	Delete Long, listy and unfunny. If a bunch of people continuously edit a page for years and it never gets any better, I'd think it's time to call it quits and start over. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 04:00, December 5, 2009 (UTC) Delete. I would suggest moving the current page to User talk:Spang/archive12 and starting over with a blank slate. The current page is way too long to prune down to a manageable size. --Mn-z; BUTT POOP!!!! 06:14, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I'm hoping this is a joke. --Andorin Kato 06:43, December 5, 2009 (UTC) We don't joke about serious stuff like this. Spang needs to be taught a lesson. We don't sit back and watch the deletion of BUTT POOP without giving the deleter his comeuppance. This is only the beginning. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 09:59, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

FUCKING SENTENCE

Keep

Keep For some fucking fuckity reason, I fucking liked it. ---Pelargonium (Talk)
Fucking Keep. Because Spike fucking predicted it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 00:09, 5 December 2009

Of course, I'd hoped that predicting it would keep you from fucking doing it!!! Spıke ¬ 00:22 5-Dec-09

Keep -RA HB 05:03, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
weak keep per above. --Mn-z; BUTT POOP!!!! 06:18, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. --Andorin Kato 06:41, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Delete

EXTERMINATE! Only contains the word "f***" and variations of specified word, and is basically 4 lines long. No worth whatsoever to Uncyclopedia, just random swearing for no point. Further, its marked as a dead end article. --TrekCaptain 22:02, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. This is when you use QVFD. Unfortunately, Socky has seen it, and has elected instead to boldface the first paragraph, so he'll be voting Keep.... Spıke ¬ 22:05 4-Dec-09

I DID put in under QVFD (yesterday). Nothing happened to it. (I BLAME THE ADMINS!!!) Ya think I should post it there again?--TrekCaptain 22:07, December 4, 2009 (UTC)

Not now that it's in VFD, that's sort of short-circuiting the voting process. Spıke ¬ 22:09 4-Dec-09

I see it in Uncyclopedia:QuickVFD/archive55 for 28-Nov, with no explanation why it wasn't huffed. Spıke ¬ 22:13 4-Dec-09

Perhaps bothering an admin about it might make them start monitoring the page more... --TrekCaptain 22:20, December 4, 2009 (UTC)

In the future, if an article repeatedly put on QVFD is not deleted, it means that it's not going to be deleted. So if this is kept, I expect to at least see a month period before it's relisted again. Continuously drawing attention to something isn't going to change what happens to it. -RA HB 05:03, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

People kept QVFDing it. I kept removing it. --Andorin Kato 06:41, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Fuck It.--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:22, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Completely redundant. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 05:05, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. and redirect per Syndrome. That other one is a better sentence and has commentary. The one is this article is too verbose. --Mn-z; BUTT POOP!!!! 06:28, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. This article was in no way funny to me, looked horrible, and made me have a miscarriage. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 06:44, Dec. 5, 2009

Comments

Recommendation: Lock and delete, should it be removed. --TrekCaptain 22:09, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Suggestion - Perhaps it could be moved to UnPoetia? -- Kip the DipTalk Works Treat ☃ 04:44, Dec. 5, 2009
TrekCaptain, it seems that you have unfortunately stumbled onto an inside joke, one of the articles that's "so bad it's good," an archetype of how not to write an article for a web site on how not to write encyclopedia articles. Let us hope that the Admins will tell us the difference, once and for all, between an article that's "so bad it's good" and an article that is simply bad. This one is simply bad. Ridicule me as an ex-Wikipedian, but some stuff needs to be written down. Spıke ¬ 12:44 5-Dec-09

Schnallball

Keep
Delete	Delete. Somewhat random '06 cruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:16, December 4, 2009 (UTC) Delete. Based on schnell? Or "small-ball" (West-coast style of excelling at fundamentals to advance runners from base to base, rather than simply hitting the ball out of the stadium)? Or is it naive to ask about its basis? Goofy but not quite funny. Spıke ¬ 21:34 4-Dec-09
Comments

Mrs. Millicent Uddersoe

Keep	Keep. It expertly does what it sets out to do. Sir Winston Pooh? The lady's ass "shaken, not stirred"? Fabulous! The section "Early life," however, does seem to exist just for completeness and needs to get funnier. Spıke ¬ 03:58 29-Nov-09 Keep. It shows some flashes of humour but needs expansion. --RomArtus (talk) 07:13, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Uncyclopeda is the top search on a very small number on google, so it's probably a totally fake person. The article is also flimsy and too short (though the committee to give Alan Moore and Bath and A Shave was sort of cute).--Count of Monkey Crisco 03:50, November 29, 2009 (UTC) Delete. I'm just not seeing the point. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 22:46, December 3, 2009 (UTC) Delete. Shouldn't have made it out of NRV way back in '06. --UU - natter 12:05, Dec 4
Comments

Married Women

Keep

Keep. It's funny in this random kind of way. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 02:17, 20 November 2009
Keep. Crap keep but a keep all the same. --RomArtus (talk) 18:35, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

Delete

Delete. An irredeemable shitfest of poop. pillow talk 19:54, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per Hyperbole. --Mn-z; BUTT POOP!!!! 23:24, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. No notable basis, inscrutable. PS--I'm biased toward Delete when any article breaks the encyclopedia canon with impossible year numbers just to display its zaniness. Spıke ¬ 20:50 23-Nov-09
soft delete Some workable random humor, but not enough to make it save worthy. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:23, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Am waiting for someone to tell us if there is a musical group by this name; that is, that this article has any basis, and that its inscrutability is an encoded reference to real facts. Spıke ¬ 22:48 19-Nov-09

So would you vote keep for real bandcruft and delete for fake bandcruft? Or the other way around? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

Mostly want to defer voting while I don't know what I don't know, which was a lot in the case of Suryavarman II. Yes, it would be more keep-able if it were clearly bandcruft. Spıke ¬ 23:26 19-Nov-09

A quick wikipedia and google search seems to say no, or at least they fail UN:CM. --Mn-z; BUTT POOP!!!! 23:49, November 22, 2009 (UTC)

Comment. I would like to see an article on Marital Arts that combines marriage and fighting. Actually, that's kind of depressing. I'm off to sulk now. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)