Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

Chyna H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 493 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Chyna is a transsexual stage wrestler who has done porn films. This article goes in a single, predictable direction (down). Spıke Ѧ 23:18 7-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I gave up after the first sentence. BrokenKnives (talk) 17:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:16, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 11:19, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm with BrokenKnives on this one. I maybe got a little further in, but quickly glazed over. I can understand the intent given a glance over the accompanying Wikipedia article, but perhaps a totally different approach would have been better. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:48, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol for vote For. A tad hard to delete this, though not a feature as such. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:25, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
    Why? Is the article internet famous? SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 19:00, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

A Day at the Barn with Hitler H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 443 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by Thetoastman in 2006. Spıke Ѧ 01:55 10-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it is not original work, it should go.--EStop (talk) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
    To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse — never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. Spıke Ѧ 10:40 10-May-15
    Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --EStop (talk) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
    If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. Spıke Ѧ 18:31 25-May-15

🔒 Labor Party H D Oldvfd Archive

Score: 0 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 431 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An attempt to highlight the link between the meanings of the word Labour in political parties and in childbirth. Ends up with an un-funny result. A re-write would be welcome, however having a page of Labour Parties seems odd when there is little connecting them but the name. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I am unaware of any "Labor Party" in a nation using the American dialect of English, and indeed this is by near-Admin Mnbvcxz (Creation Summary: "Just to clarify, this is parody, and I do NOT have a birth fetish....") He has a big one, but this article set out to do something funny (blur labour with childbearing) and succeeded. It is not the topical approach nominator, or I, would have taken to a political topic, but it is a valid, pun-based comedy approach. Spıke Ѧ 02:58 11-May-15
Comments

Al Qaeda Chicken H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 95 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This 2007 article about something made-up starts with generic quotation and "nobody gives a shit" and descends into horrible typography and listcruft. Clean it up and there would still be nothing there. Spıke Ѧ 13:37 24-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not going to lie, it had some moments that made me chuckle, like some of the chicken preparation steps and the Engrish advertisement. But it commits many small sins, including not only the aforementioned lists, but also the inappropriate use of first-person, capitalization errors, and some frankly stupid parts. Combined with the fact that many people would likely not think to search for this, and I can't justify keeping it. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • On a somewhat unrelated note, the actual KFC article is in an even worse state of disrepair, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house H T D Survivor

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 71 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A chatty article about nothing. Spıke Ѧ 13:41 25-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it was written better and actually contained humor, it might have been better located on HowTo. As it stands though, it doesn't really belong anywhere here. It actually comes across as really boring. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:33, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Hemorrhoid H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 62 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An extremely short (3-paragraph) article filled with nonsense. Only a handful of edits were made, the last dating back to 2013. AFAICT, it's garbage in its purest form and has no reason to exist. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Admin Zim ulator swings and misses in 2013. My god, it has nothing that even relates to hemorrhoids. Spıke Ѧ 23:04 25-May-15
    Sorry, I guess the final word does. Spıke Ѧ 23:10 25-May-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Ukrainian Nazi Party H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 41 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nothing comparable on Wikipedia. Twelve different external links. It feels as though author wants me to read all the available evidence to support his point, which still isn't funny. Spıke Ѧ 19:48 26-May-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Didarasq H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 14 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not used anywhere on Wikipedia; Google it and you get references to this article. A ton of Finnish-language humor and a "Test" that is a list telling the same joke over and over. Spıke Ѧ 23:02 27-May-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects