Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit an article during a vote to delete it. You can flip your vote if the article improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read why we voted to keep it, the last time.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question, or else the moderator may invalidate the vote. If adding {{VFD}} to an article already under vote, reset the 24-hour clock.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Expert3222 • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

Cats Don't Dance H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 1642 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Made up film with a great slab of text I have no intention of improving.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:24, September 13, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The Great Slab of Text is indeed impressive. Too bad I don't have the time nor the patience to read the entire thing. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 02:37, October 3, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. It's like Plan 9 From Outer Space except not as unintentionally funny or coherent. --Nigel Scribbler (talk) 09:32, October 14, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Actually re:Romartus it's a real movie, not a made up one. I think that I can clean it up into something bearable.--HolUp (talk) 04:07, October 22, 2017 (UTC)
  1. One I obviously missed. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:43, November 20, 2017 (UTC)
Comments

That Guy H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 1422 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listy, random, and filled with red links, relying on gross out humor with no central theme. It's not someone else. Irritable of contents (talk) 17:50, September 22, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Delete I hate this article more than I hate angry swans. I want you to imagine how much I hate angry swans. Matt lobster (talk) 21:57, November 1, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I have seen angry swans, and they look and sound uuugly. Malseka Planko (talk) 21:38, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

List of People who Always Appear when you Least Want Them to H Archive

Score: 6 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 1340 hours
Delete (6)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A rubbish list.--HolUp (talk) 03:27, September 26, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe as a category, but not as a standalone article. Quite crufty. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 20:13, October 7, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nearly hopeless with more sections than smiles. The unshining example for not liking bulleted lists --Nigel Scribbler (talk) 08:44, October 14, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. No way to improve this. Dumpster time. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:47, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Delete I believe this to be no more than the rantings of a listy madman. We should confiscate his soul. Matt lobster (talk) 21:53, November 1, 2017 (UTC)
  6. Symbol delete vote Delete. Just a list, but would make a great category. Malseka Planko (talk) 21:37, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Green monkeys H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 901 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Unfunny repetitious padding, plus an external link to what looks like a dead tripod page with no funny. I thought of trying to upgrade this but there's nothing to work with here --Nigel Scribbler (talk) 10:17, October 14, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Monkey pants. Green or in any other colour. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:45, October 18, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. ...and unfunny contradicting padding. Just thinking if Pink Hitler was attacked by the Green Monkeys...hmmm. Malseka Planko (talk) 21:43, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Clown hunters H T D Survivor

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 715 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listy: emos, rape, memes, tentacle rape, George W. Bush, 007, piss and some more random celebrities and swearing. By the second paragraph of Australian commandos versus clowns it has already died. Irritable of contents (talk) 04:02, October 22, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Appears to be written by an 11yo Reddit hater by its crap content and tone. After all those editors, nothing better has resulted. --Nigel Scribbler sig2 (talk) 09:31, October 22, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Just annoying. Malseka Planko (talk) 21:51, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lot of randumbo mixed in the greasepaint with this entry. Bring off the clowns.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:19, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Taxi (TV series) H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 710 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Topic is needed, but what little there is here is mostly red links --Nigel Scribbler sig2 (talk) 09:20, October 22, 2017 (UTC)
  2. DeLEte The joke is it's a fly on the....nevermind. Matt lobster (talk) 21:55, November 1, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. or complete do-over...agree with comment (2). Malseka Planko (talk) 21:55, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  1. Romartus is a 70s dude isn't he? Maybe he could add more to the article, if he watched the show (which was fairly popular in its day).--HolUp (talk) 09:25, October 22, 2017 (UTC)
  1. This 'Romartus dude' speakin'. Never watched the show but you are right that I am of that age bracket! --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:16, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
  1. 3 sentences, no humor and no pictures is worthless and is enough to make visitors leave and not come back. I know the show quite well but this is not worth saving just because the topic happens to exist. --Nigel Scribbler sig2 (talk) 09:48, October 22, 2017 (UTC)

Love Triangle H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 498 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is a two paragraph long pitch for an article, followed by a list of cast members, I wouldn't even call this a compete trailer. If someone wants to flesh this out with a bunch of love triangle movie cliches than feel free, but I've got nothing and I've seen three Christian Bale movies with love triangles recently, granted two involved one woman and two dudes and the third involved like seven women. Irritable of contents (talk)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Weakest of the weak stuff here. This is not even trying to be funny, just canned blather. --Nigel Scribbler sig2 (talk) 00:49, November 9, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Made my eyes cross. Malseka Planko (talk) 22:01, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Shrek H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 305 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful picture, reads like an unfunny history lesson on the movie more than anything, no comedic subtlety in the writing, just very bad.--User:Slintzwinslow.1:48, November 8, 2017 (EST)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I like the picture, but it's almost entirely like a plain Wikipedia article. Needs to go back into the shop for perhaps a concept/viewpoint to riff on and needs more dashes of funny rather than sprinkles --Nigel Scribbler sig2 (talk) 01:10, November 9, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I think it's an alright article, though it might need tweaks. I'm of course saying this because I'm author of the article, but I honestly feel it's not that bad.--HolUp (talk) 22:26, November 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. The author has promised an improvement.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:21, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
Comments

Tourneyfag H D

Score: 5
Elapsed Time: 44 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Overly stringent rules in video game tournaments is a thing worth criticizing I guess, but this article is almost entirely about Super Smash Brothers and what humor it has should be put there instead, repetitive and reliant on cursing for shock efect. The list at the bottom is for speed running which is a loose definition of tournament that would include having the high score on Pac Man, Castlevania and Final Fantasy were one player last time I checked. ESports is a topic worth having a page for, but it might as well be built from scratch. Irritable of contents (talk)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A rather obscure 4chan/Dramatica term that nobody will look up.--HolUp (talk) 03:14, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Social drama queen rantings. Malseka Planko (talk) 22:06, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Endless ranting with a lot of slobbering --Nigel Scribbler sig2 (talk) 23:00, November 20, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Makes no sense to me but then I come from the analogue age. The writer Mr-ex777 was always getting his ass banned back in the day. So..yep, flush it. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:52, November 20, 2017 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects