Nominations for Sysops (2 required)
MrN9000
- Nom, we might be able to get MrN9000 back, and as an Admin, now that most unpleasant people are gone.--Funnybony
14:52, Jan 21
- Why did he stop? I reckon he was offended by some jerks. Does anyone know how to reach him? He might be interested in returning to a sanitized Uncyclopedia. Anyone have his email? Chief? Why don't we ask him?--Funnybony
16:18, Jan 21
- I have his email, and actually wrote him not long ago but haven't checked my emails (I don't do it religiously. Al 16:37
- Mr N remains an admin but he hasn't been here for sometime. --
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:25, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Mr N remains an admin but he hasn't been here for sometime. --
- I have his email, and actually wrote him not long ago but haven't checked my emails (I don't do it religiously. Al 16:37
- Why did he stop? I reckon he was offended by some jerks. Does anyone know how to reach him? He might be interested in returning to a sanitized Uncyclopedia. Anyone have his email? Chief? Why don't we ask him?--Funnybony
Mnbvcxz (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom. --ShabiDOO 08:00, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Double nom. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 19:23, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- For.--Funnybony
07:41, Jan 21
Simsilikesims (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom. --ShabiDOO 08:03, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- double nom --Mn-z 07:20, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
- For.--Funnybony
07:41, Jan 21
StupidBunny (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Admin Sandwich. --ChiefjusticePS2 08:11, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Nom nom. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 19:22, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- BIG For.--Funnybony
07:41, Jan 21
SPIKE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom--
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:15, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Double nom Aleister 12:53 17-1
- BIG For.--Funnybony
07:41, Jan 21
For - Nothing would please me more than for him to be a top Keebler elf in the decaying stump that is UncycloWikia. -- 21:50, Jan. 21, 2013
Funnybony (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom 01:04 17 Jan
- Double nom. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 19:24, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- YIKES. Funnybonny is too good at writing and so essential for unnews and non-confrontation I ummmm..... --ShabiDOO 21:04, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Funnybony has scratched his nom (see page log). --
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:41, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Funnybony has scratched his nom (see page log). --
Aimsplode (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- He deserves it. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:58, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Deserves what? --
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:49, January 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Deserves what? --
- To be an admin, of course. (Oh, also nom). ~ Sat, Jan 19 '13 22:27 (UTC)
- I have decided to acclaim Aimsplode as the admin for this fork. He is clearly the best contender and if anything...he should be crat for life. --ShabiDOO 21:08, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
Meganew (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- nom, because he likes preggo pics. --Mn-z 07:49, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
- For.--Funnybony
07:41, Jan 21
Nominations for Bureaucrat (1 required)
Romartus (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Thanks Shabidoo but I prefer not to stand against ChiefjusticeDS for bureaucrat. --
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:03, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
ChiefjusticeDS (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom. --ShabiDOO 08:05, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- This looks like chief is the only person who is qualified to be elected a 'crat and hasn't turned it down. Therefore, I propose 'cratting him now rather than going thru the farce of an uncontested election. --Mn-z 07:22, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
- HUGE For.--Funnybony
07:41, Jan 21
- Seconded per Mnbvcxz. --
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:00, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
Acclamation. There are no other reasonable nominees and no legitimate reason for further nominations in the final six hours; and everyone active on this side has had a chance to speak. Chief is demonstrably committed to the continuing vigor of the Mother Ship and is its most stabilizing influence. Spıke ¬ 18:08 21-Jan-13
- Actually, I beg to differ. I'm not adding my second nomination as expediency is important, however I'd like to add User:SPIKE as a second nomination on the condition that we have two new 'crats. With the loyalties of many with existing admin access leaning away from the site, we're now open to “Admin-only vandalism” much like HotAdmin4U's recent addition to MediaWiki:Sidebar. Given it's an unusual time the need for another 'crat to be able to remove admin rights is important for these cases (as neither of our precious 'crats are active here that much any more). Expecting one individual to be able to monitor this is likely to be problematic. While I agree with Chief's acclamation, I'd suggest a vote for Spike as 2nd 'crat should be held. 10:02 21 Jan
- If you show me a community vote to deop an admin I will happily do it. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
- The fact that you refer to the fork as the real site in your edit summary (making this a fake or pretender site) illustrates my point quite effectively. Your activity - or lack thereof - on this wiki is what I'm referring to. The issues with vandalism and off-site linkage disguised as “official” links to a splinter site by previously effective admins suggests that a 'crat focused on improving this wiki would be stepping in already, rather than having to have Wikia step in on our behalf. We need admins and 'crats who are focused here - not divided focus and muddled priorities. 11:48 21 Jan
- If you show me a community vote to deop an admin I will happily do it. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, I beg to differ. I'm not adding my second nomination as expediency is important, however I'd like to add User:SPIKE as a second nomination on the condition that we have two new 'crats. With the loyalties of many with existing admin access leaning away from the site, we're now open to “Admin-only vandalism” much like HotAdmin4U's recent addition to MediaWiki:Sidebar. Given it's an unusual time the need for another 'crat to be able to remove admin rights is important for these cases (as neither of our precious 'crats are active here that much any more). Expecting one individual to be able to monitor this is likely to be problematic. While I agree with Chief's acclamation, I'd suggest a vote for Spike as 2nd 'crat should be held. 10:02 21 Jan
Frosty (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups)
- Nom. --ShabiDOO 08:05, January 17, 2013 (UTC)</s>
- As Frosty now primarily edits the new site there seems to me very little point in having him run for bureaucrat here. If I am incorrect in this I am more than happy to re-instate the nomination, let me know on my talk page. --ChiefjusticePS2 08:09, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Vote for ChiefjusticeDS ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
20:33, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Vote for ChiefjusticeDS ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
