Uncyclopedia:VFS

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m ({{user|ChiefjusticeDS}}: Clarification)
(FU FROSTY)
 
(338 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--{| class="messagebox nonwhite" align="center" width="100%" style="border: 2px solid #000099;background-color:#99ccff"
+
<!--Comment out whichever is inappropriate-->
|-
+
<!--{{VFSrules}}-->
|
+
{{VFSandwich}}
[[Image:GoldenSandwich.png|thumb|250px|The coveted golden sandwich.]]
 
__NOTOC__
 
=== Vote for Sandwiches ===
 
Welcome to Uncyclopedia's '''VFS''', or '''Vote For Sandwiches''' to give it its full title.
 
   
This is the place where each month (or any other arbitrary length of time), Uncyclopedia users choose and vote for their '''favourite sandwich''' at any particular moment in time.
+
===Do we need new administrators?===
  +
{{s|1}}
   
The winner shall be proclaimed '''''{{cl|red|Sandwich of the Month}}''''', and shall have the exclusive honour of being eaten by some, all, or no Uncyclopedia admins. Pictures may or may not be posted at their discretion.
+
#{{For}} We haven't had any new administrators since December 2013, apart from {{u|PuppyOnTheRadio|Puppy}}, who, as far as I know, has been opped for technical reasons (and therefore without a community vote). And, no matter how you look at it, a system needs a regular blood and energy flow not to stagnate. The 'old' admins can be doing a great job, but the site can't survive on them only. Look at how many active admins we have: if one or two leave, then for us this will be comparable to a catastrophe. I therefore am sure we need to hold a new VFS. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:15, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
+
#:{{Comment}} One of the possible concerns I can see is a difficulty in finding new candidates. I don't think we need any super-experienced people as administrators, who know every single in and out about the site. An interesting alternative will be to give the rights to new, but interested and active users (because they will be most likely to introduce great new initiatives). {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:15, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
=== Rules ===
+
#::Well if we do drop out, extended notice will be given. I have no plans to drop out or drop off.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:41, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
* Only '''sandwiches''' may be nominated.<sup></sup>
+
#{{Against}} The drop-off in administrative service has kept pace with the drop-off in the need for it. If we were to suddenly walk away, Wikia would surely use staff to keep the site going until a new crew emerged. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:11 9-Dec-14</small>
* All nominations must be edible by humans.
+
#{{For}} {{User:Meganew/sigb}} 08:04, December 10, 2014 (UTC)
* Votes are limited to '''1''' per household.
+
#'''Meh''' I don't see a great need for new administrators. Romartus and SPIKE are still around most of the time. Chief, Sims & myself are around some of the time to get things done. But then again, I've always thought more doesn't really hurt + there are at least a few rollbackers around that would do just a good job as the current admins. So for the record this is just me '''abstaining''' because there is no need, but it can't really hurt either. {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 22:09, December 10, 2014 (UTC)
* IPs may only nominate '''<u>half</u> a sandwich'''.<sup>∆</sup>
+
#'''What [[User:Frosty|fucknugget]] said.''' --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 15:07, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
* When nominating a sandwich, you must describe it in as much detail as you feel like.
 
 
:<small>†: Though "sandwich" could mean anything.</small>
 
:<small>∆: Half sandwiches may be combined to form a full sandwich by two IPs.</small>
 
 
Please note: anyone caught disobeying the rules will face either an '''instant ban''', '''infinite decapitation''', or '''both'''.
 
 
''NB: The ops can change these rules at any time for any reason to help the fight against awesome sandwiches, such as - beans on toast''
 
 
|}
 
 
=Past Winners=
 
'''Schnitzel sandwich''' &bull;
 
'''[[Nigger Dogshit Sandwich]]''' &bull;
 
'''[[Ménage à Trois]]''' &bull;
 
'''Double Cheeseburger?''' &bull;
 
'''That sandwich my mom used to make me whenever there was a snow day''' &bull;
 
'''[[Chicken]] [[Parmesan]][[User:CheddarBBQ|o]]''' &bull;
 
'''[[Knuckle sandwich]]''' &bull;
 
'''THE Grinder''' &bull;
 
'''[[Bacon and Cheese Sandwich of 1905]]''' &bull;
 
'''[[:File:Bacon sandwich.jpg|Bacon Sandwich]]''' &bull;
 
'''[[User:Mnbvcxz/UnRecipies:BUTT POOP!!!! Sandwich|BUTT POOP!!!! Sandwich]]''' &bull;
 
'''[[Fries with that]] Sandwich''' &bull;
 
'''[[Bread]] & [[Butter]] Sandwich''' &bull;
 
'''[[Wikipedia:Team Fortress|Sandvich]]''' &bull;
 
'''The sandwich that a kind black man shared with me''' &bull;
 
'''{{U|Zombiebaron}}''' &bull;
 
'''[[Taco]]''' &bull;
 
'''[[User:CheddarBBQ|My]] [[penis]] between two pieces of bread''' &bull;
 
'''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKRsMhb2pho&feature=related A sandwich which is certainly not a song]''' &bull;
 
'''[[:File:Bread jesus.jpg|A jesus sandwich]]''' &bull;
 
'''[[User:Lyrithya|Me]]''' &bull;
 
'''An allegorical sandwich''' &bull;
 
'''[[Sushi]]''' &bull;
 
'''[[Sheep shagging|Wait:What?]]''' &bull;
 
'''[[:File:Michael Jackson toast.jpg|Toasted Michael Jackson on white bread]]''' &bull;
 
'''[[:File:Sand witch.jpg|Sand witch]]''' &bull;
 
'''[[:File:Friendlys-Grilled-Cheese-BurgerMelt.jpg|Sandwich Sandwich]]''' &bull;
 
'''Tomato and cucumber on whole wheat, with only mustard and bean sprouts''' &bull;
 
'''Admin sandwich''' &bull;
 
'''Pink Taco''' &bull;
 
'''[[:File:Body sandwich.jpg]]''' &bull;
 
'''An open penis sandwich with maple syrup''' &bull;
 
'''Boobs sandwich'''
 
 
<div align="center">For full details, root through your stool</div>-->
 
{{VFSrules}}
 
<br>
 
'''<big><big><center>VFS is currently open for nominations only. You cannot nominate yourself. Do not vote yet. Voting begins on the 22nd of January. See [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:We_need_more_admins?t=20130116151640#VFS here] for further details.</center></big></big>'''
 
 
==Nominations for Sysops (2 required)==
 
===<s>{{u|MrN9000}}</s>===
 
*Nom, we might be able to get MrN9000 back, and as an Admin, now that most unpleasant people are gone.--{{User:Funnybony/sig}} <small><small>14:52, Jan 21</small></small>
 
**Wasn't he already an admin? I thought so, but I might be wrong (have to use up my quota for the year). [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 15:35 jan21
 
***He was an admin, and he hasn't been active in a while. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:59, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
::Why did he stop? I reckon he was offended by some jerks. Does anyone know how to reach him? He might be interested in returning to a sanitized Uncyclopedia. Anyone have his email? Chief? Why don't we ask him?--{{User:Funnybony/sig}} <small><small>16:18, Jan 21</small></small>
 
:::I have his email, and actually wrote him not long ago but haven't checked my emails (I don't do it [[UnNews:Scientology, true faith?|religiously.]] [[user:Aleister|'''Al''']] 16:37
 
::::Mr N remains an admin but he hasn't been here for sometime. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 17:25, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
==={{user|Mnbvcxz}}===
 
*Nom. --{{User:Shabidoo/sig}} 08:00, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*Double nom. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 19:23, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*For.--{{User:Funnybony/sig}} <small><small>07:41, Jan 21</small></small>
 
 
==={{user|Simsilikesims}}===
 
*Nom. --{{User:Shabidoo/sig}} 08:03, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
* double nom --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 07:20, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
*For.--{{User:Funnybony/sig}} <small><small>07:41, Jan 21</small></small>
 
 
==={{user|StupidBunny}}===
 
*Nom. --{{User:Shabidoo/sig}} 08:03, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*For.--{{User:Funnybony/sig}} <small><small>07:41, Jan 21</small></small>
 
 
==={{user|PuppyOnTheRadio}}===
 
*Admin Sandwich. --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 08:11, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*Nom nom. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 19:22, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*BIG For.--{{User:Funnybony/sig}} <small><small>07:41, Jan 21</small></small>
 
 
==={{user|SPIKE}}===
 
*Nom--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:15, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*Double nom [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 12:53 17-1
 
*BIG For.--{{User:Funnybony/sig}} <small><small>07:41, Jan 21</small></small>
 
*{{for|For}} - Nothing would please me more than for him to be a top Keebler elf in the decaying stump that is UncycloWikia. {{User:Kip the Dip/sig}} <small>21:50, Jan. 21, 2013</small>
 
 
===<s>{{user|Funnybony}}</s>===
 
*Nom {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:04 17 Jan}}
 
*Double nom. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 19:24, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*YIKES. Funnybonny is too good at writing and so essential for unnews and non-confrontation I ummmm..... --{{User:Shabidoo/sig}} 21:04, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
:*Funnybony has scratched his nom (see page log). --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 07:41, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
==={{user|Aimsplode}}===
 
*He deserves it. -- {{User:Zombiebaron/sig}} 22:58, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
:*Deserves what? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 11:49, January 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
*To be an admin, of course. (Oh, also nom).{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20130119222715}}
 
*I have decided to acclaim Aimsplode as the admin for this fork. He is clearly the best contender and if anything...he should be crat for life. --{{User:Shabidoo/sig}} 21:08, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
==={{user|Meganew}}===
 
*nom, because he likes preggo pics. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 07:49, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
*For.--{{User:Funnybony/sig}} <small><small>07:41, Jan 21</small></small>
 
 
==Nominations for Bureaucrat (1 required)==
 
===<s>{{user|Romartus}}===
 
*Nom. --{{User:Shabidoo/sig}} 08:05, January 17, 2013 (UTC)</s>
 
:Thanks Shabidoo but I prefer not to stand against ChiefjusticeDS for bureaucrat. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 10:03, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
==={{user|ChiefjusticeDS}}===
 
*Nom. --{{User:Shabidoo/sig}} 08:05, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*This looks like chief is the only person who is qualified to be elected a 'crat and hasn't turned it down. Therefore, I propose 'cratting him now rather than going thru the farce of an uncontested election. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 07:22, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
*HUGE For.--{{User:Funnybony/sig}} <small><small>07:41, Jan 21</small></small>
 
*Seconded per Mnbvcxz. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 18:00, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*{{For|Acclamation.}} There are no other reasonable nominees and no legitimate reason for further nominations in the final six hours; and everyone active on this side has had a chance to speak. Chief is demonstrably committed to the continuing vigor of the Mother Ship and is its most stabilizing influence. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:08 21-Jan-13</small>
 
*:Actually, I beg to differ. I'm not adding my second nomination as expediency is important, however I'd like to add [[User:SPIKE]] as a second nomination ''on the condition that we have two new 'crats''. With the loyalties of many with existing admin access leaning away from the site, we're now open to “Admin-only vandalism” much like HotAdmin4U's recent addition to [[MediaWiki:Sidebar]]. Given it's an unusual time the need for another 'crat to be able to remove admin rights is important for these cases (as neither of our precious 'crats are active here that much any more). Expecting one individual to be able to monitor this is likely to be problematic. While I agree with Chief's acclamation, I'd suggest a vote for Spike as '''2nd 'crat''' should be held. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:02 21 Jan}}
 
*::If you show me a community vote to deop an admin I will happily do it. -- {{User:Zombiebaron/sig}} 23:30, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:::The fact that you refer to the fork as the ''real site'' in your edit summary (making this a ''fake'' or ''pretender'' site) illustrates my point quite effectively. Your activity - or lack thereof - on ''this'' wiki is what I'm referring to. The issues with vandalism and off-site linkage disguised as “official” links to a splinter site by previously effective admins suggests that a 'crat focused on improving this wiki would be stepping in already, rather than having to have Wikia step in on our behalf. We need admins and 'crats who are focused here - not divided focus and muddled priorities. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:48 21 Jan}}
 
 
===<s>{{user|Frosty‎‎}}</s>===
 
*Nom. --{{User:Shabidoo/sig}} 08:05, January 17, 2013 (UTC)</s>
 
*As Frosty now primarily edits the new site there seems to me very little point in having him run for bureaucrat here. If I am incorrect in this I am more than happy to re-instate the nomination, let me know on my talk page. --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 08:09, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
**'''Vote for ChiefjusticeDS''' {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 20:33, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
===<s>{{user|Aleister in Chains}}</s>===
 
*{{boner}} Because he keep refusing to become an admin. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:03 17 Jan}}
 
*:Evidently declined by Aleister 16:19, 2013 January 17‎. I'll just strike it through. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:27 17-Jan-13</small>
 

Latest revision as of 15:07, December 11, 2014

GoldenSandwich

The coveted golden sandwich.

Vote for Sandwiches

Welcome to Uncyclopedia's VFS, or Vote For Sandwiches to give it its full title.

This is the place where each month (or any other arbitrary length of time), Uncyclopedia users choose and vote for their favourite sandwich at any particular moment in time.

The winner shall be proclaimed Sandwich of the Month, and shall have the exclusive honour of being eaten by some, all, or no Uncyclopedia admins. Pictures may or may not be posted at their discretion.

Rules

  • Only sandwiches may be nominated.
  • All nominations must be edible by humans.
  • Votes are limited to 1 per household.
  • IPs may only nominate half a sandwich.
  • When nominating a sandwich, you must describe it in as much detail as you feel like.
†: Though "sandwich" could mean anything.
∆: Half sandwiches may be combined to form a full sandwich by two IPs.

Please note: anyone caught disobeying the rules will face either an instant ban, infinite decapitation, or both.

NB: The ops can change these rules at any time for any reason to help the fight against awesome sandwiches, such as - beans on toast

Edit


Past Winners

Schnitzel sandwichNigger Dogshit SandwichMénage à TroisDouble Cheeseburger?That sandwich my mom used to make me whenever there was a snow dayChicken ParmesanoKnuckle sandwichTHE GrinderBacon and Cheese Sandwich of 1905Bacon SandwichBUTT POOP!!!! SandwichFries with that SandwichBread & Butter SandwichSandvichThe sandwich that a kind black man shared with meZombiebaronTacoMy penis between two pieces of breadA sandwich which is certainly not a songA jesus sandwichMeAn allegorical sandwichSushiWait:What?Toasted Michael Jackson on white breadSand witchSandwich SandwichTomato and cucumber on whole wheat, with only mustard and bean sproutsAdmin sandwichPink TacoFile:Body sandwich.jpgAn open penis sandwich with maple syrupBoobs sandwich
Edit the winners

For full details, root through your stool

edit Do we need new administrators?

Score: 1
  1. Symbol for vote For. We haven't had any new administrators since December 2013, apart from Puppy, who, as far as I know, has been opped for technical reasons (and therefore without a community vote). And, no matter how you look at it, a system needs a regular blood and energy flow not to stagnate. The 'old' admins can be doing a great job, but the site can't survive on them only. Look at how many active admins we have: if one or two leave, then for us this will be comparable to a catastrophe. I therefore am sure we need to hold a new VFS. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 20:15, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol comment vote Comment. One of the possible concerns I can see is a difficulty in finding new candidates. I don't think we need any super-experienced people as administrators, who know every single in and out about the site. An interesting alternative will be to give the rights to new, but interested and active users (because they will be most likely to introduce great new initiatives). Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 20:15, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
    Well if we do drop out, extended notice will be given. I have no plans to drop out or drop off.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:41, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol against vote Against. The drop-off in administrative service has kept pace with the drop-off in the need for it. If we were to suddenly walk away, Wikia would surely use staff to keep the site going until a new crew emerged. Spıke ¬ 22:11 9-Dec-14
  3. Symbol for vote For. Revolutionary, Anti-Bensonist, and TYATU Boss Uncyclopedian Meganew (Chat) (Care for a peek at my work?) (SUCK IT, FROGGY!) 08:04, December 10, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Meh I don't see a great need for new administrators. Romartus and SPIKE are still around most of the time. Chief, Sims & myself are around some of the time to get things done. But then again, I've always thought more doesn't really hurt + there are at least a few rollbackers around that would do just a good job as the current admins. So for the record this is just me abstaining because there is no need, but it can't really hurt either. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 22:09, December 10, 2014 (UTC)
  5. What fucknugget said. --ChiefjusticePSX 15:07, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects