From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The coveted golden sandwich.

Vote for Sandwiches

Welcome to Uncyclopedia's VFS, or Vote For Sandwiches to give it its full title.

This is the place where each month (or any other arbitrary length of time), Uncyclopedia users choose and vote for their favourite sandwich at any particular moment in time.

The winner shall be proclaimed Sandwich of the Month, and shall have the exclusive honour of being eaten by some, all, or no Uncyclopedia admins. Pictures may or may not be posted at their discretion.


  • Only sandwiches may be nominated.
  • All nominations must be edible by humans.
  • Votes are limited to 1 per household.
  • IPs may only nominate half a sandwich.
  • When nominating a sandwich, you must describe it in as much detail as you feel like.
†: Though "sandwich" could mean anything.
∆: Half sandwiches may be combined to form a full sandwich by two IPs.

Please note: anyone caught disobeying the rules will face either an instant ban, infinite decapitation, or both.

NB: The ops can change these rules at any time for any reason to help the fight against awesome sandwiches, such as - beans on toast


Past Winners

Schnitzel sandwichNigger Dogshit SandwichMénage à TroisDouble Cheeseburger?That sandwich my mom used to make me whenever there was a snow dayChicken ParmesanoKnuckle sandwichTHE GrinderBacon and Cheese Sandwich of 1905Bacon SandwichBUTT POOP!!!! SandwichFries with that SandwichBread & Butter SandwichSandvichThe sandwich that a kind black man shared with meZombiebaronTacoMy penis between two pieces of breadA sandwich which is certainly not a songA jesus sandwichMeAn allegorical sandwichSushiWait:What?Toasted Michael Jackson on white breadSand witchSandwich SandwichTomato and cucumber on whole wheat, with only mustard and bean sproutsAdmin sandwichPink TacoFile:Body sandwich.jpgAn open penis sandwich with maple syrupBoobs sandwich
Edit the winners

For full details, root through your stool

Nominations for June 2014

Are new administrators needed?

Score: 3
  1. Symbol for vote Yes Last time this question was raised, two people said yes and two - no. The situation has changed: out of six people on the active administrators list only three make edits regularly. VFH, VFD and several other pages need helping with. What else? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:41, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Sure. Probably because I'm one of the 3 that don't edit regularly (well I'll try to edit more, now that I'm on Uni break). Hasn't been any new sysops since February 2013 and here it is June 2014 so why not? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 23:51, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Yep. It has been long enough.                               Puppy's talk page08:27 am 23 Jun 2014

"Users as trial admins for a month" project

See previous vote and the previous discussion on the project
Score: 2
  1. Symbol for vote For the idea that Puppy proposed in April In my opinion, having 'trial' admins would be as helpful as beneficial for the site as having new admins. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:41, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
  2. I would prefer trial admins. --ShabiDOO 16:30, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools