Need Constructive Critism, and this image would probally never be featured. --NXWave 14:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
I think some of the jaged edges on Mr. Potatohead need to be smoothed out. It also looks more like a poster from 1992 instead of 2002. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 11:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Ah, yes. From that template I deleted. UGH. -- T. (talk) 20:44, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
(Just reviewed all the entries) Christ. This is like the Hall of Horrors. Did I take a wrong turn and end up at the freakshow? At least it's behind a closed door. (shudder) -- T. (talk) 20:52, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I've got an idea - how about every time Kakun nominates one of these pictures, somebody copy in about 18 fake "For" votes from nonexistent ID's, only it's always the same bunch of fake votes? And then the picture just gets deleted the next day anyway? You have to figure after, say, 10 or 11 times, maybe he'd figure out what was going on? --Fred Larsen 10:10, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Against I don't want to sound negative, but to me this looks worse than the last Rubik's Sudoku submission. --—rc(t) 04:48, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
My gut tells me against even though this is clearly a masterpiece of biblical proportions. I'm sure RadX would agree.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 04:50, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Against. The other one wsan't great, but it was better. ---Rev. Isra(talk) 04:57, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Against. I get it: the Uzi is oozing. Not laugh out loud funny, though. ---Rev. Isra(talk) 04:17, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against A pun on the way it sounds, I love puns, but if the image was in a better place instead of a white background, then I'd give it a for--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 07:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Well, in Kakun's defence, it's one of his better images. The glasses are made of Euro's... Hence: Eurovision... So yeah AGAINST --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFUF@H|VFP|+S 02:29, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Thanx anyway. I think North Amerians don't realy know these concepts. Should the caption be shorter or what? Kakun 02:34, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC
Bob Dylan's debut album cover. As a single, he released his "Willy".
This is parody, but the original album is known enough, I think. -- Kakun 20:24, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
9 Sorry, but it's just not doing it Lord Karaluch | Talk 14:02, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
. This kiwi pie ad is an anagarm of the answer, "Wikipedia", witch is even worse than Wikipie, the official kiwi pies Wiki (and also than the unofficial kiwi pies Wiki, Wikiwi).
The original is too big so I nominate this detail. -- Kakun 23:44, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Against. I think you are really missing the point of VFP, Kakun. An image needs to be pretty immediately funny out of context, and usually has to display some technical skill. I suggest you hold back on the nominations for awhile and observe what sort of images get featured before adding more nominations.
Two thumbs down as it's quite clearly the work of a lazied individual. All three visible sides are the same image rotated, skewed, mirrored and/or "negatived". God knows what little work was done on the other three. --MoneySign 07:07, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Against (At least for the time being). I love the idea and I think that a well-made image could make it through a nomination. The only problems I have with this newer image is that it doesn't really scream "RUBOKU!" so much as "WTF?!". I could stand to include a few more references to the Rubiks Cube and Sudoku. The perspective is also a little odd... -JBob 20:05, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
The new version looks better, however against because it still does not look like front page material. --80.227.58.13 22:26, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Does not do anything special for me. --Isra1337 02:05, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
No, it still doesn't feel like a featured image. They're usually instantly funny, and at a minimum funny with their tags. This one isn't, it just seems like a link to an article. »BrigSirDawg | t | v | c» 02:47, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
For: The picture is kinda crap but the concept is not. Makes me laugh, but not a normal 'ha ha' laugh, more the crying despair laugh from too much sudoku at night. FireballX301 19:15, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)