This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFP.
To stand out or to be retarded? Tony blair is an unfashionable block head bling brain who makes mismatched politics a fashion. He has his visions set, as he happily cuts parts out of magazines, but will it be enough to save his political career? He'd better see his stylist - it's no good trying everything! Heil Hitler?
For. This is a great example to all. A true masterpiece, misunderstood for its time! I only just found this gem the other day. Would be sad to let it go to waste. --Reallybloodymental (talk) 15:24, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
For. currently being the funniest image on this page. --Imrealized...hmm? 11:35, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
Against Votes: 5
Against.Seems a bit fucking pointless. But it's still funny. Most things everywhere are pointless though including pictures that are funny and unpointless. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byReallybloodymental (talk • contribs)
Dexter used to be a kewl uzer here but then he left and when we asked him to come back this was his response and so "FU Dexter" and... um... yeah, explaining the joke never works. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 16 '12 12:50 (UTC)
Against. Because secretly, I think he'd want me to do this. --UU - natter21:33, Dec 21
Against. I'm scared of the dark. --Prätt Körp (talk) 04:21, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Against. bad inside joke. --Mn-z 18:44, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
15 And Wilde turned, and went down from the mount, and the two tables of the testimony were in his hand: the tables were written on both their sides; on the one side and on the other were they written.
16 And the tables were the work of God, and the writing was the writing of God, graven upon the tables.
For. Because flaming children are less offensive than naked children. --Mn-z 01:35, March 30, 2013 (UTC)
For. On a serious note, this pic is well chopped considering the black and white aspect and the difficulty factor of 9. The feature should go to both users - the one who added the realistic and proper-era plane and to Unununium for setting the exhibitionist on fire. Aleister 10:08 29-3-'13
Against. This pic is clearly not original, as indicated by the watermark in the lower right hand corner. Quit borrowing pictures and make your own Photoshops. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. 17:10, September 29, 2013 (UTC)
Against. Indeed; the instructions don't say, "Vote for the funniest thing you found somewhere." Spıke¬ 17:27 29-Sep-13
No need for words, featureworthy. Aleister 12:00 25-1-'13
For. Think of the possibilities. Lincoln Park, Lincoln/Elvis sing along, "Many Species of Tall Furry Politicians Gathered Together in a Cave and Groovin' with a Pict."--Uncycloperson (talk) 12:00, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
Comment. I think this nomination is invalid. Tom Mayfair's version has another site's watermark on the top left corner. The website's apparently down so we can't know for sure if it was used for hosting images or creating gifs but since Tom wasn't known for his potatochopping abilities, I'm going to go with the first one and call this unoriginal work. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 17:16, March 27, 2014 (UTC)
Conflicting pieces of information, either Tom was a reknown potatochopper and made this or he wasn't and stole off other websites. I think we ought to give him the benefit of the doubt and vote for. However I will wait a bit before doing so in case any new evidence arises. SirScottPat (converse) VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 18:17, March 30, 2014 (UTC)
This image has been nominated for highlighting on the front page—you can vote for it or nominate your favourite images at Uncyclopedia:VFP.
Romartus is the admin responsible but as he has a lot on his plate it usually requires a little reminder by me to make him check whether he needs to feature or remove VFP noms. I'll ask him about this now. SirScottPat (converse) VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 10:26, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
I am not sure this image (or this joke) comes originally from Uncyclopedia. I've seen plenty different versions of the same idea elsewhere on the Internet, and while I cannot find any which would precede this file, I am still in doubts. Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:05, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
For. Nice and thanks for fixing it! Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:26, March 8, 2014 (UTC)
As a fan of Scotland, I vote no. Aleister 17:59 28-3-14
Against Votes: 1
Slightly Against. The frames are uneven, the original image of the horse rider (which by the way is of low quality) is poorly chopped, and so is Charles' head (which overlaps the orange frame). The attempts to fix those bad 'shoops with MS Paint's brush tool only made 'em worse. Lastly, I'd prefer it if you didn't use MS Paint text on a movie poster. I'm going to come out and say it and please don't take this the wrong way but this shoop's kinda bad. However, you've obviously dedicated a lot of time into making this image, and I acknowledge that it's a good result, considering your limited resources on image editing software (I'm guessing you only have MS Paint?). These reasons would've made me vote a For for this, if I were to judge on the effort and not on the overall outcome. Word of advice, try out GIMP, it's a free graphics editor that's pretty much like Photoshop. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:43, March 8, 2014 (UTC)
Not MS paint, no. One below, Powerpoint. I understand what you say and appreciate your view. I'm afraid that to be able to change it (thanks to the nature that I saved it with) I would have to start again, something I'm not prepared to do on that. I can attempt to fix the areas where the frame is uneven. The hat is intentionally meant to break the frame. But what's more important is that you voted and are keeping this area of the site alive so thanks a lot! SirScottPat (converse) VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 15:02, March 8, 2014 (UTC)
There is a slight problem with the head, I think. Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:26, March 2, 2014 (UTC)
It's breaking the frame and there is a very small bit of the old head that did not get erased, I think. Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:13, March 8, 2014 (UTC)
Look closely at his right cheek. Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:14, March 8, 2014 (UTC)
I can erase the last bit of the head, sorry. However it is intended to break the frame as that is how DVD covers look too. The main thing is whether you get the joke or not! SirScottPat (converse) VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 12:19, March 8, 2014 (UTC)
I get the joke, so I'll vote! Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:26, March 8, 2014 (UTC)