This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
Against. I don't care who nominated it... I don't get it. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101113 - 18:39 (UTC)
Zombiebaron Text-based. Isn't there some rule about noobs nominating things on VFP? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:55, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
piiiiiiiiiissssssssssssssss --Roman Dog Bird 18:27, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
Against. I don't get it either. --Dame 14:09, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
Eggs. I hope I've made myself clear. --BlackFlamingo 14:35, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain. I liked the "Let's Do It Live" thingy, but I'm honestly not sure what fitness and video games have to do with Bill O'Reilly. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM21:04, 13 November 2010
For. Laying down on the job hippie? And a chimp too! Is the chimp's girlfriend singing an opera? She's got a pretty good voice! --Magical Man 01:32, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
For: I saw this picture on Image Request and I was like "Wow look at that it is funny." -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 04:37, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
There's always room for more gay necrophiliac ducks. ~ 12:28, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
Don't see why not. --BlackFlamingo 19:57, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
Look Like Gay Duck Well Just Have Moments In Time of n00b. Assalamualaikummy Talkneed work: 16:19, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
For. Not technically brilliant but funny. I think it's better that it is not the best quality cause somehow I think gay duck necrophila could only get worse with detail. --Dame 11:22, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
For. Feature, it should be on every page on Uncy. Aleister 23:35 23 10
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA --Roman Dog Bird 18:58, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
For. this is by far the funniest one ive seen today. love it :)--Ilovemyfiance18 04:55, November 26, 2010 (UTC)ilovemyfiance
Weak against. I kind of get what is going on here, but without the title I couldn't have a clue. The picture itself just isn't done as well as it could of. Because of that, it doesn't garner the laughs it could of, for me. And it kind of creeps me out, as well.-- (CUN) 05:36, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Aye, image itself just isn't good enough. Squashed-like and messed-up shadows and stuff, even, let alone the lack of subject clarity. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100924 - 06:04 (UTC)
Against. perspective is off, aa is the shadows. The ducks look way too large with respect to the background. The two on the right especially. The overall image size is also too small, especially for how busy it is. This image should probably be about 600x800 or so. If its too small, it will be unnecessarily blurry and look bad, if its too large, artifacts of the editing won't be smoothed out and it will look bad. --Mn-z 13:57, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
Against: The hand is kinda pixally, the whole image is very texty, and making fun of Grand Theft Auto hasn't been fashionable for like half a decade. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 05:00, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
Also, the top of his sleeve is black and white while the bottom is red. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 05:02, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
What the zombie guy said. That, and the colours that are there do not even match... ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100926 - 06:09 (UTC)
Against. per above. And the image feels "off" for some reason. --Mn-z 21:56, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
Against. The GTA thing has seriously been done to death. --Dame 11:17, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Oh good, a GTA-related image. Haven't seen one of those before - it's what the world has been crying out for. --UU - natter10:04, Nov 11
I've heard that John Lydon spent days in his Microsoft Paint laboratory working on this masterpiece. It also has to do with hijackings or guns or something.
Nom & for. Quite possibly one of the most outstanding pieces of artwork this site has ever seen! LeutnantHerrThatdamnedfollowspot 03:32 Thursday, October 7, 2010
For. Better than I could do, certainly. Outstanding work. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101007 - 03:37 (UTC)
For. Outstanding. He stands out, doesn't he? --StyleGuide 15:14, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
Hey guys am I cool enough to make a joke vote on a nom that's two months old? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 01:12, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
Against Votes: 9
Against. .jpg format. Everyone knows non-photographic images should be uploaded in a non-lossy format, such as .png. --Mn-z 16:57, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
Literary Against Clearly the expression on the face of the carjacker, in its quiet and perfect sadness, uncovers a deeply complex and conflicted character, a troubled human being who is deeply regretful of the traumatizing effect his actions have on the car's passengers, but tosses them on the pavement and beats them anyway,all the while wishing his career path had not come to involve leaving behind a trail of spurting bodies,mangled cop cars,unheeded stop lights, unconvincing prostitutes, and the fractured psyches that result from having annoying cousins call you every five minutes about going to see "big amerr-e-can titeez". But the emotion is far too well developed for a Grand Theft Auto game.KUNVFHPOTMVFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 18:12, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
Zombiebaron: This image was funny when I first saw it come up in Recent Changes and in the context that it was originally created for. I don't think that it is funny enough to be a featured image (mainly because it's not very funny outside of it's original context). For examples of featured images from 2005 that share a similar concept as this image please see: here and here. In fact, if you were to combine those two pictures you might get this picture. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 03:50, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
Against Per Zombiebaron & Meep. --Dame 11:16, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Oh good, a high-quality MS Paint image. What a novel idea for a VFP nom. Ha. Ha. --UU - natter10:15, Nov 11
Self Nom and For. It's been awhile since anything of mine was nominated on VFP (as far as I know). Since I don't seem to be able to think of any funny new image ideas, I've decided to self nominate an old image of mine from 2008. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 04:41, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
Fiore Gives me chills up my spine, of pleasure! Aleister 1:38 8 12
Against Votes: 8
Against. Jesii, LOL. --Mn-z 14:15, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
The shark's head is just not well-attached. It looks like a hollow thingy was just put on whatever's under the sharksuit... and if that's the intent, then this is an against vote out of sheer confusion. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101023 - 15:05 (UTC)
Fuckers. Go against eat shit! --Roman Dog Bird 22:10, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
Against. - If you improve the blending on the head though, I'd consider changing my vote. -- Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 11:09, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
Against. 1. Head is jarring against the rest of the pic. 2. Really struggling to see how this is, y'know, funny. --UU - natter10:32, Nov 11
against. --124.176.168.87 09:00, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
against. Why a shark? Why not a goldfish??--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:39, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
crapphotoshopfail--Poiz,Teh zork master!!! 01:21, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
You are not Christians! --95.41.209.84 16:31, December 12, 2010 (UTC)
Some are, some aren't. What? 1234~ 18:02, 12 December, 2010
Widely heralded as one of Michelangelo's greater masterpieces, the Creation of Jimbo graces the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to this day, reminding all those penitent enough to look up of where their wikis came from.
Self-nom and for. I couldn't think of anything better to nominate. ~*shifty eyes*(talk) • (stalk) -- 20101128 - 19:52 (UTC)
Against Votes: 4.5
Against. As part of the sitenotice this image is featured on every page of the site at the moment. Be that as it may I don't really find it funny although it is certainly well made. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 20:32, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
The banners are great, and really well made, but they don't really work without the context of the Wikia spoof. --BlackFlamingo 20:05, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
this is seriously the only image up at the moment, wowzers --Roman Dog Bird 22:34, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
Nom&For Nice image. Not so hard to create but very nice. --~ 16:25, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
Super for. There is nothing to get, it is a well made adburd image. It is really really reall great (would be even better in an article though no???) —The preceding unsigned comment was added byShabidoo (talk • contribs)
The Untato, ported to SVG format. I tried to duplicate the "coffee stained" effect, which wasn't very easy. See wikipedia:Vector graphics if you don't know why that's amazing.
Against. This is basically the same as the site's logo. The logo is already "featured" at the top of every article. Also, the letters on the top left piece are "rcm". Despite those facts and the fact this image doesn't even attempt to be humourous, it does look good. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 02:17, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
It's lacking even what texture the original has. And while that would be doable with patience and precision, it'd still just be a copy of the site logo. 1234~02:24, 6 February 2011
While it's beautifully done (in stark contrast to Wikipedia's new vectorized logo which looks ugly compared to their previous logo), VFP isn't really for this kind of pictures. Against per Zombiebaron, basically. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM02:25, 6 February 2011
No Damn. I don't remember the last time I voted against something :P SirPtok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 22:47, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
For. Made pretty well and has different angles of humour and it explains so many unanswered questions about the series... --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 16:58, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1
Against. So...ummm...it's basically just a bunch of text. I mean, if it was a picture of Dumbledore and his gay lover Gandalf...that would be a totally different thing. Also, I feel like the magazine should be called Muggles. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 05:28, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
Against.Honestly, I have no freaking idea what I'm looking at. pillow talk 20:24, March 5, 2011 (UTC) Okay, we have a weird problem where animated gifs don't always animate, and I don't know what's up with that. But - I am 100% sure this is not original; I've seen it before, years ago. pillow talk 20:26, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, I'll just put in an actual vote. Same reason. 1234~02:24, 6 March 2011
I'm laughing my balls off right now. --Roman Dog Bird 02:58, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Is this original? The guy doesn't include it in his list of things he did... 1234~20:20, 5 March 2011
Unoriginal for sure. Predated by a few weeks by this Youtube video, though the .gif was probably around before then as well. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:44, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
Not the best picture ever made. But hey, at least it's worth a chance. It was created on a program called paint on my computer, so that's why its not professional artwork.
For. Because everything Sonje does is brilliant but this captures the whole article spot on.Sog1970 12:46, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
Against Votes: 4
I guess I must be uneducated because I had to look up who Raymond Chandler was. Now that I've looked him up I don't really understand what is funny about changing Agatha Christie's name with his. If you explain it and I laugh I will change my vote. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 04:55, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
I, on the other hand, don't really give a damn. --Roman Dog Bird 04:57, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
For. Nice, and it already summerizes itself so maybe no caption is needed. And I think the cuts you see, Mimo, might be light shining from the ax handle and not a bad chop. Good pic! Aleister 23:49 4-3-'11
I had to look up the fellow, and I still don't get it. Also, the composition could use work. 1234~21:56, 12 March 2011
Oh shut up why don't you --Roman Dog Bird 03:37, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
Zombiebaron It is very texty. However, the text on the top of the box is obviously totally unrelated to Charlie Sheen (it seems to be in a foreign language). Also the text on the green part ("Side effects include..." et cetera) is very hard to read, even at full size. With a few tweaks this image could be improved greatly. But also Charlie Sheen jokes have already pretty old. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 22:14, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
Badge of Anullwarts School of Magic and Mystery for Spoilbitches and Wise-arses. Much of the action within the Hairy Porker tales revolve around Anullwarts.
I dunno about nudity or organs or what-have-you being cause for againstings in of themselves, but I'm not really seeing how it's funny, either. School of magical kinkiness? 1234~02:32, 6 February 2011
"George Bush is evil" jokes were never funny. Every president gets an undue amount of criticism while in office and is labeled "evil" by some group of people. It doesn't make it funny. It makes people easily manipulated.
That's another thing. Bush isn't in office anymore, so even if this were funny at some point, it certainly wouldn't be anymore. He's gone, and no one gives a shit about him.
This doesn't look "evil", it looks like somebody had fun with a clone brush. The result is an unrecognizable face, though certainly not anything I'd describe as evil. Maybe you're trying to make him look like a well-known evil character here, but I doubt it.
Even if this were somehow recognizable as "evil," it doesn't make any sense for this to be "George Bush before he puts his mask on" when he's obviously speaking in public.
Finally the photoshop job is exceptionally poor. The fact that I'm able to scream "clone brush" while having virtually no photoshop experience of my own should give some idea why. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 13:50 Mar 25, 2011
Against Not original. Plus, the animation is stiff and the women are poorly drawn. Oh, and it isn't funny. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 19:13, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
For. I really do love this. It is so funny, and such a twist on a theme, that yes, For. And I'd say the poorly cut paper isn't a mistake, but is what the paper would look like if a dolphin rips it out of a notebook on porpoise and fins away. Aleister 16:26 31-1-'11
Mega for!!! This was BY FAR the best image of the entire poo lit competition. Even outside of the article it is really great, the dolphins jutting out of the sea, their stupid smiles and the homework at the front. Its funny out of context and helarious in the article. --Shabidoo 15:50, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
Nom This is way too funny to not be featured! DJ Mixerr 22:24, February 5, 2011 (UTC) (talk)(contributions)
Against Votes: 10
Out of context, this just isn't that funny. Add the relatively poor cut-out of the paper and I have to say against. 1234~16:28, 30 January 2011
It's a great picture for the article, but without the context doesn't work. --BlackFlamingo 13:11, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
Against. Haven't read the article yet, it may well be hilarious. But without it, this is a picture of some dolphins, one of which has some paper in its mouth. Not funny of itself. --UU - natter15:08, Feb 8
Against is this supposed to be funny? - Another n00b 09:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
Against. per my hatred of dolphins and all things related to their general smugness --Dame 13:54, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
Yes, because you have a floppy dick. -- 00:49, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Neither I like the concept bit the quality of the chop is a little lacking. A little more cleaning up and I would vote for, but as is I'd rather not see it as front page. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009
The only thing I can see wrong is there is a blue line above the upper jaw of the dolphin, where it meets the paper. Everything else seems fine. The teeth are holding onto the paper, so that seems okay. Is it just the blue line needs erasing? Aleister 00:50 2-2-'11
I tried fixing it up a little here. Better? Worse? The same? Makes you want to stab yourself in the eyes it's so bad? You tell me. -- 01:02, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
It's just that it doesn't quite work. It looks like the are around the mouth has been cut out and then put back badly, and the homework itself I'd expect to be more on the same plane as the lower jaw of the dolphin, instead of the way it is looking line it's hanging there vertically. Maybe I'm being too picky, but it look's like a chopped image rather than a dolphin holding a piece of homework. I also have about 10 articles to vote on, and staying here and belaboring the poor dolphins isn't helping me get those done. That, and the 12 hour work days. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009 04:38, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
Aye, and you may want to use a smooth brush to cut-out the top - since that part would actually just be the paper behind the dolphin, not ripped like the bottom of the cut. Think about how it would look if the dolphin was actually holding it. 1234~05:04, 2 February 2011
I uploaded a better version of this file. It's better, right? --~ 14:07, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
Awe, but now it doesnt have a bad looking verticle lined upper lip anymore :(. Yes, it does look better Mimo. It still makes me smile seeing it right before the punchline of your article. --Shabidoo 23:19, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
p.s. I had a go at the lip and brushed it up and added a little tear in the corner of the sheet. Its under the file dolpha.jpg, look at it if you want and replace it if you like. Though, I dont know if people would make problems with you using an image in your article for the competition that someone touched up even though it a small one, its more a case of getting it featured, so you may not want to replace the file (if you like it) if anyone does have a problem with it (?), until after the competition voting --Shabidoo 00:11, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
Fisn't realize that this in in a PLS entry. If that's the case, then can I suggest that this entire nomination be removed until after PLS voting is complete. Given you aren't supposed to use pee, RadicalX's corner or VFH on an article until after PLS is done, the fact that this is up here is a twisting of the rules that makes me feel more than a little uncomfortable. SirCPTDrPuppyOnTheRadioGUNUmPWotMNotMFPVFPVFHCMPOTMUGM00:40, June 5, 2009 02:04, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
I love it when you feel a little uncomfortable, Uncle. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 05:07, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
Against. In what age was that picture taken? 
Chronarion because this was really nommed by Chronarion. --
Abstain. I liked the "Let's Do It Live" thingy, but I'm honestly not sure what fitness and video games have to do with Bill O'Reilly. 
What Not to be a buzzkill, but what? --
Um... no. --
*shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101128 - 19:52 (UTC)
16:25, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
Smite. Didn't really do it for me 
• 
• 
• WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 02:10, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 15:43, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
15:54, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
